v.file/asap+tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · scope of consent final judgment and stipulated permanent...

18
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2015 CA002751XXXXMB OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA Plaintiff, v. ASAP TECH HELP, LLC, and MICHAEL MCARDLE, an Individual, and DUSTIN PILLONATO, an Individual Defendants, and ASAP TOTAL HOME, LLC, and KESILS MARKETING, LLC, and ASAP HOME ENTERTAINMENT, LLC Relief Defendants. CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION This Consent Final Judgment and Stipulated Permanent Injunction was entered upon agreement between Plaintiff, The Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, . S!ate of Florida (The "Department"), and ASAP Tech Help, LLC ("ASAP"), Michael McArdle, an individual, and Dustin Pillonato, an individual (collectively referred to as the "Parties"). JURISDICTION AND VENUE The Parties hereby agr:ee and stipulate that this Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter pursuant to the provisions of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Chapter 501, Part II, Florida Statutes, and that venue is proper in this Court in that the actions at issue took place in or affected more than one judicial circuit in the State of Florida. The Parties, having stipulated that this Court has jurisdiction to enter a final judgment and D? 111'1 Initials

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jun-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2015 CA002751XXXXMB

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA

Plaintiff, v.

ASAP TECH HELP, LLC, and MICHAEL MCARDLE, an Individual, and DUSTIN PILLONA TO, an Individual

Defendants, and

ASAP TOTAL HOME, LLC, and KESILS MARKETING, LLC, and ASAP HOME ENTERTAINMENT, LLC

Relief Defendants.

--------------------------~/

CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION

This Consent Final Judgment and Stipulated Permanent Injunction was entered upon

agreement between Plaintiff, The Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs,

. S!ate of Florida (The "Department"), and Defendant~, ASAP Tech Help, LLC ("ASAP"),

Michael McArdle, an individual, and Dustin Pillonato, an individual (collectively referred to as

the "Parties").

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

The Parties hereby agr:ee and stipulate that this Court has jurisdiction over the parties and

the subject matter pursuant to the provisions of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices

Act, Chapter 501, Part II, Florida Statutes, and that venue is proper in this Court in that the

actions at issue took place in or affected more than one judicial circuit in the State of Florida.

The Parties, having stipulated that this Court has jurisdiction to enter a final judgment and

D? 111'1 Initials

Page 2: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

permanent injunction in this matter, agree to the entry of the Consent Final Judgment and

Stipulated Permanent Injunction and to the findings of fact set forth below to resolve all matters

in dispute in this action between them. The Court, having reviewed the file and necessary

papers, makes the following findings:

FINDINGS OF FACT

I. The Parties

A. The Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, State of Florida

(the "Department" or "Plaintiff') is an agency of the State of Florida and the enforcing authority

under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ("FDUTPA"), Florida Statutes

Section 501.20 1 et seq.

B. ASAP Tech Help, LLC ("ASAP"), is a Florida limited liability company

organized under the laws of Florida on or about September 20, 20 13, and maintains a principal

place of business registered as 430 S. Congress A venue, Suite 1 D, Delray Beach, Florida 33445.

Since its inception, ASAP has marketed, advet1ised, and sold products and services to consumers

relating to technical support services for personal computers.

C. Michael McArdle is an individual over the age of 18 and is the Manager and

registered agent of ASAP. Since ASAP's inception on September 20, 2013, Michael McArdle

has actively controlled and directed the business and operations of ASAP.

D. Dustin Pillonato is an individual over the age of 18 and is a Manager of ASAP.

Since ASAP's inception on September 20, 2013, Dustin Pillonato has actively controlled and

directed the business and operations of ASAP.

II. Background

2

f>'P tYt;VJ In itials

Page 3: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

E. The Department initiated an investigation into allegations that ASAP engaged in

acts or practices in the State of Florida and elsewhere that were misleading, unfair, deceptive or

unconscionable in the marketing, advertising, and performance of providing technological

support services and software products. The allegations include: engaging in deceptive

advertising to lure consumers under false pretenses to contact ASAP through misleading pop-up

advertisements directing consumers to contact a toll-free telephone number; engaging consumers

to allow ASAP to gain remote access to consumers' personal computers in order to conduct a

misleading diagnosis of computer and software issues; convincing consumers that the diagnostic

revealed damage and/or malware on consumers' personal computers, when it did not; and

persuading consumers to purchase unnecessary and costly software support services and

products to remedy non-existent computer issues.

F. The alleged unfair and deceptive acts, if proven at trial, would violate the Florida

Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act Section 501.20 1 et seq as well as, potentially other

state or federal regulations.

G. In lieu of litigation and trial, and without expressly admitting any of the

allegations of the Complaint, the parties stipulate to the entry of this consent final judgment and

permanent injunction. ASAP, Michael McArdle, and Dustin Pillonato waive any and all rights

and defenses that might preclude entry and the full force and effect of this consent final judgment

and permanent injunction.

WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing factual findings, it is hereby ORDERED AND

ADJUDGED:

3

f9 dA Initials

Page 4: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION

1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney General,

Department of Legal Affairs, State of Florida (the "Department"), 110 SE 61h Street, 1oth Floor,

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 , and against ASAP Tech Help, LLC, at 430 S. Congress Avenue,

Suite lD, Delray Beach, Florida 33445, Michael McArdle, at 269 NE 13th Street, Delray Beach,

Florida 33444, and Dustin Pillonato, at 1843 16th Avenue Nmih, Lake Worth, Florida 33460.

2. The court finds that the purpose of FDUTPA is to "protect the consuming public

and legitimate business enterprises from those who engage in unfair methods of competition, or

unconscionable, deceptive, or unfair acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce."

Section 50 1.202(2). To that end, "reasonable restrictions upon the future activities of any

defendant to impede her or him [sic] from engaging in or establishing the same type of

endeavor" are permitted by the Act, and courts may "order any defendant to divest herself or

himself of any interest in any enterprise." Section 50 1.207(3). Prohibiting business activities is

constitutional when the limitation is rationally related to the State's objective of preventing

deceptive practices. Fraternal Order of Police v. Dept. of State, 392 So. 2d 1296, 1302 (Fla.

1980) (upholding regulations in the Law Enforcement Funds Act even though they were not "the

best possible means to eradicate the evils perceived" because they were not "wholly unrelated"

to the legislature's purpose). In such cases, a permanent injunction may be entered by the Court.

The parties have agreed to the entry of the Permanent Injunction.

I. Injunctive Terms

4

DP t11fr7 Initials

Page 5: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

3. The Court hereby permanently enjoins ASAP, Michael McArdle, Dustin

Pillonato, as well as their officers, agents, servants, employees, and those persons in active

concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting

directly or indirectly, from the following:

a. Any acts or practices that violate the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade

Practices Act, Chapter 50 I. Part II, Florida Statutes; as alleged in the complaint,

including without limitation:

1. internet advertising or marketing meant to direct consumer traffic to

any website, webpage. or secondary advertisement, related to any

technical and/or software support entity where ASAP, Michael

McArdle, or Dustin Pillonato conduct business;

11. engaging in any business that markets or sells computer security or

performance software or support services or products;

111. receiving payment or any other benefit through any partnership,

alliance, joint venture, or agreement with any business that offers

consumers computer security or performance/technical support

services and/or software products which engages m any of the

deceptive acts or practices set forth in the complaint;

IV. using any false or misleading statement to induce any person to pay for

goods or services;

v. From the date of this Judgment forward, Defendants are prohibited

from selling, renting, leasing, transferring, using, disclosing, or

5

uP ;Jt(tt} Initials

Page 6: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

intentionally obtaining any pecuniary benefit from the priYate (i.e. not

public) consumer information, including name, address, telephone

number, e-mail address, social security number, credit card number,

bank account information, or other identifying information of any

person, that ASAP. Michael McArdle, or Dustin Pillonato obtained

prior to the entry of this Judgment in connection with any activity that

pertains to the subject matter of the Attorney General's investigation

v1. failing to disclose m inbound telephone calls from consumers,

promptly and in a clear and conspicuous manner, the nature of the

goods or services and/or any other fact material to consumers

concerning any good or service.

II. Restitution and Fees

4. The court finds that FDUTP A authorizes reimbursement to consumers who have

been damaged by deceptive trade practices. §501.207(3), Fla. Stat. All consumers who paid

money in response to a deceptive trade practice are entitled to their money back, and there is no

need for an individualized inquiry into how each consumer reacted to the practice. F. T. C. v.

Wilcox, 926 F. Supp. 1091 , 11 05 (S.D. Fla. 1995); F. T. C. v. People 's Credit First, No. 8:03-CV-

2353-T, 2005 WL 3468588 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 18. 2005).

It is understood that other persons or parties may have access to this information . The prohibition in th is provision is limited strictly to actions undertaken speci fically by Defendants, after the date of the entry of th is final judgment.

6

o? rt/1 Initials

Page 7: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

5. The Court further finds that while restitution serves the purpose of restoring an

injured person to the financial position held before a defendant received an unlawful benefit,

with a civil penalty "the Jaw exacts payment by way of punishment for doing some act which is

prohibited . .. " Sun Coast Intern. Inc. v. Dept. of Business Regulation, 596 So. 2d 1118, 1121

(Fla. 151 DCA 1992) (internal citations omitted). Anyone who has used a trade practice found to

be unlawful under the Act is liable for a civil penalty of up to $10,000.00 per violation.

§501.2075, Fla. Stat. Each instance in which a deceptive representation is disseminated

constitutes a violation. US. v. Reader's Digest Ass 'n, Inc. , 662 F. 2d 955, 966 (3d Cir. 1981 ).

6. Judgment, which shall be suspended as set forth below, in the amount of Seven

Million Seven Hundred Sixty Thousand and Three Hundred and One Dollars ($7,760,301.00) is

entered in favor of Plaintiffs against Defendants, (for which let execution shall issue forthwith if

the suspension of the judgment set forth herein is lifted), apportioned as follows:

a. Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable for Four Million Dollars Seven

Hundred and Sixty Thousand and Three Hundred and One dollars ($4,760,301.00) in

consumer restitution.

1. Defendants are ordered to pay One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1 00,000.00),

payment being made by wire transfer, ce1tified funds or cashier's check, payable

to the Department of Legal Affairs Escrow Fund as set forth in subsection (ii)

infra. Payment shall be sent to Michelle Pardoll, Assistant Attorney General,

Office of the Attorney General, Consumer Protection Division, 110 SE 6111 Street,

10111 Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 3330 1.

7

DP ;V/;17 In itials

Page 8: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

u. Defendants shall pay Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and 00/100 Dollars

($9,800.00) simultaneously with Defendant's provision of the partially executed

Judgment, and the remainder shall paid in equal monthly installments of Eight

Thousand Two Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($8,200.00) over a period of 11

months, the first payment beginning the first day of the month following the

Court' s execution of this Judgment. Upon receipt, each check shall be deposited

into the Department of Legal Affairs Escrow Fund, in accordance with Section

501.2101(1), Florida Statutes for distribution to consumers according to the sole

business judgment of the Department. In the event actual restitution for future

complainants exceeds the Restitution Amount, then the Restitution Amount will

be distributed pro-rata to the complainants determined by the Department to be

eligible for restitution. In no event shall any individual consumer receive more

than the amount they are actually owed. If any restitution monies remain after the

distribution of the Restitution Amount, the Department will deposit the remaining

monies into the Department of Legal Affairs Revolving Trust Fund and it shall be

used to defray the costs of restitution distribution and any attorneys' fees and

costs incurred in this matter.

b. In this case, the Department has also alleged that more than 300 transactions of unfair

or deceptive conduct occurred. Given the nature of the violations and the consumer

harm, the appropriate penalty sought and agreed to by the parties could be $10,000.00

per violation, for a total penalty of Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000.00). The

Defendants have agreed to the penalty set forth in this suspended Judgment and ifthe

8

12? ;t]~ Initials

Page 9: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

suspension of the Judgment is lifted. the Defendants agree and the Court finds that the

Defendants are and will be jointly and severally liable therefor.

7. As long as there is compliance with the payment obligations of the $100,000.00,

as referenced in paragraph 6(a)(i), the remainder of the judgment shall remain suspended, subject

to the provisions below.

8. The Plaintiffs agreement to the suspension of the monetary portion of the

Judgment IS expressly premised upon the Defendants ' compliance with the terms of this

Judgment. The suspension of the monetary portion of this Judgment will be lifted if, upon

motion by Plaintiff and hearing, the Court finds that Defendants violated the terms of this

Judgment.

9. The Plaintiffs agreement to the suspension of part of the Judgment is also

expressly premised upon the truthfulness, accuracy, and completeness of ASAP Tech. LLC,

Michael McArdle, and Dustin Pillonato' s financial disclosures provided to the Attorney

General' s Office during the week of May 27, 2015. The suspension of the Judgment will be

lifted if, upon motion by Plaintiff, the Court finds that ASAP Tech Help, LLC, Michael

McArdle, or Dustin Pillonato made any material misstatement or omission in these financial

disclosures.

10. If the suspension of the Judgment is lifted, the judgment becomes immediately

due in the amount specified in Paragraph 6 above, less any payment previously made pursuant to

Paragraph 6(a)(i), plus interest computed from the date of entry of this Order.

11. The Department also reserves the right to seek attorneys' fees and costs incurred

as a result of any future noncompliance by any party.

9

D? !11!1 Initials

Page 10: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

12. Acceptance by the Office of the Attorney General of the terms of this Judgment

shall be established by the signature of the Deputy Attorney General. The receipt by the Office

of the Attorney General of any monies pursuant to the Judgment does not constitute acceptance

by the Office of the Attorney General, and any monies received shall be returned to Defendants

if this Settlement Agreement is not accepted and executed by the Deputy Attorney General.

III. Additional Terms

13. ASAP, Michael McArdle, and Dustin Pillonato shall not destroy, mutilate,

conceal, alter, or dispose of ASAP's books, records, contracts, financial records, consumer files

and financial information, regardless of the manner in which it is stored, for a period of two (2)

years from the date of this consent final judgment and stipulated permanent injunction. At any

point during the two (2) year retention period set forth herein, Michael McArdle shall make any

and all books and records available to the Department within three (3) business days upon

request.

14. Michael McArdle and Dustin Pillonato shall each complete and sign a Credit

Report Authorization and Release Form provided by the Office of the Attorney General and shall

return the aforementioned Form with this signed and notarized consent final judgment and

stipulated permanent injunction. This Credit Report Authorization shall be considered additional

disclosure of information in furtherance of the disclosures provided.

15. In the event of failure to make payments in accordance herewith, and the lifting of

the suspension of this Final Judgment, Michael McArdle and Dustin Pillonato shall each

complete under oath Florida Rule of Civil Procedure Form 1.977 (Fact Information Sheet),

including all required attachments, and serve it on the Attorney General, within 30 days from the

10

D~ M/t1 Initials

Page 11: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

date the Court enters an Order on this consent final judgment and stipulated permanent

injunction, unless the judgment is satisfied. Failure to comply with this section shall constitute a

violation of this consent final judgment and stipulated permanent injunction and may subject

ASAP, Michael McArdle, and Dustin Pillonato to any and all penalties set forth herein.

16. Pursuant to Section 222.11, Florida Statutes, and the executed Waiver of

Garnishment Exemption attached hereto as Exhibit A, Michael McArdle waives any claim of

exemption from garnishment in any garnishment proceeding initiated to collect monies due

under this consent final judgment and stipulated permanent injunction.

17. Pursuant to Section 222.11 , Florida Statutes, and the executed Waiver of

Garnishment Exemption attached hereto as Exhibit B, Dustin Pillonato waives any claim of

exemption from garnishment in any garnishment proceeding initiated to collect monies due

under this consent final judgment and stipulated permanent injunction.

18. ASAP, Michael McArdle, and Dustin Pillonato shall not affect any change in the

form of doing business or the organizational identity of any of the existing business entities or

create any new business entities as a method of avoiding the terms and conditions set forth in this

consent final judgment and stipulated permanent injunction.

19. This Judgment is continuing in nature and shall be binding on any and all

successors or assigns of ASAP, Michael McArdle, and Dustin Pillonato.

20. This Judgment is not a waiver of any private rights of any person or release of any

private rights, causes of action, or remedies of any person against ASAP, Michael McArdle,

Dustin Pillonato, or any other person or entity. Notwithstanding any other provision of this

consent final judgment and stipulated permanent injunction, nothing herein shall be construed to

11

:W? ;fliJ In itials

Page 12: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

impair, compromise or affect any right of any government agency other than the Office of the

Attorney General for the State of Florida relating to the operative facts at issue.

21. Nothing herein shall affect ASAP, Michael McArdle, or Dustin Pillonato's (a)

testimonial obligations, or (b) right to take legal or factual positions in defense of litigation or

other legal proceedings to which the Department is not a party.

22. The Parties jointly participated in the negotiation of the terms articulated in this

consent final judgment and stipulated permanent injunction.

IV. Penalties For Noncompliance

23. Any failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this consent final

judgment and stipulated permanent injunction is by statute prima facie evidence of a violation of

Chapter 501 , Part II, Florida Statutes, and upon failure to comply with the terms and conditions

of this consent final judgment and permanent injunction, the suspension of the judgment will be

lifted, and Defendants will be subject to attorneys ' fees and costs in lifting the judgment and the

collection thereof. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction makes a determination that

a violation of any provision of this consent final judgment and stipulated permanent injunction

has occurred, then the violating Defendant(s) shall be jointly and severally liable for the full

judgment, as well as any additional attorneys' fees and costs, and other relief as may be allowed

by law.

24. This Court retains jurisdiction of this case to enforce the terms of this consent

final judgment and stipulated permanent injunction and enter any further Orders as may be

necessary to ensure compliance, including by contempt proceedings, civil and/or criminal.

V. Waiver By Parties Of Hearing

12

j)Y MAI1 Initials

Page 13: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

25. This document is signed in anticipation of this consent final judgment and

stipulated pennanent injunction being submitted to the Court for approval, without necessity of

hearing, which is hereby waived by all parties. The signatures below indicate the parties' consent

and agreement to this consent final judgment and stipulated petmanent injunction.

13

d)p tvtt Initials

Page 14: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

AGREED TO:

By: ~,~ ¥211? Michael McArdle, (Date Signed) Authorized agent of ASAP Tech Help, LLC

STATE OF FLORIDA )

COUNTY OF BROW ARD )

BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized to take acknowledgments in the State of Florida, Michael McArdle as authorized agent of ASAP Tech Help, LLC. He acknowledged before me that he executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein stated on the a~'-' day of (Y\~ , 20 I 5.

I

Subscribed to before me this aqt--\ day of (Y\~1 , 2015. J

'

~ ....... ~~~~'~(:~,,, f~m·· <t-\_ BERNARD M CASSIDY •

~ ~ • : • ~ Notary Public - State of Florida ~ ~~"' ~~f My Comm. Expires Sep 2& 2016 • ,,~.OF f\.o: ,,, Com I •

, '''"""''' m sslon # EE 838459

(print, type, or stamp commissioned Notary Public) -

Personally known / or Produced Identification ___ (check one)

Type of Identification Produced: ____ _____ _

By: ~~~~----------------------------------------~---+----~arshall Adams, Esq. (Date Signed)

/ lorida Bar No. 712426

14

DP J1fri Initials

Page 15: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

By ;~ ~fCAnJie,lndividually

-'YZV/z (Date Signed)

STATE OF FLORIDA )

COUNTY OF BROW ARD )

BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized to take acknowledgments in the State of Florida, Michael McArdle, personally appeared. He acktWwledged bx.~re me that he executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein stated on the ~"1h.day of \ l lC<.t. , , 20 15.

Subscribed to before me this ~jL"-1 day of «\""-' I , 20 It '

(print, type, or stamp commissioned Notary Public)

Personally known / or Produced Identification ___ (check one)

Type of Identification Produced: ___ _ ____ _ _

15

,,,uu.,,, ''':\~y Pu.'t,_

/~m~<i'\ BERNARD M CASSlDV • ~ ; • • : • i Notary Public - State ot Florid ~

-:.~ "~ M a , ~ ,,.,.,.f" r~>"' .. l Y Comm. Expires Sep 26 2016 , '' OF f\.0 ,, C • ,,,,,.,,.,,, ommlsslon * EE 838459

D? IJ;t'] Initials

Page 16: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

By:_~~~~~·~~~----------------------~~~lz~s~l ~r~-Dustin Pillonato, Individually (Date Sign'ed)

STATE OF FLORIDA )

COUNTY OF BROW ARD )

BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized to take acknowledgments in the State of Florida, Dustin Pi llonato personally appeared. He acknowledged before me that he executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein stated on the l9±.1.day of (fl ~ , 20 15.

Subscribed to before me this ll_ ~ i.-\, day of (Yl~ , 2015.

NOTARY PUBLIC

Cb<tl1~i M c.>~.~"" }

(print, type, or stamp commissioned Notary Public)

~'~~!/~~,,, . $"J3m~{:~ BERNARD M CASSIDY

• ~ • : • ~ Notary Public - State of Aorida , ~~~ ijf My Com~. Expires Sep 26, 2016 , ''••?f.f.~··•' Comm•sslon # EE 838459

-- - --Personally known / or Produced Identification _ __ (check one)

Type of Identification Produced:. _________ _

16

v? ;41p1 Initials

Page 17: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA:

By: p wh-t_ ... _ A -~ fA'R-''-'' A ~A. Conners Associate Deputy Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs Office Of The Attorney General The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32399-1 050 Telephone: (850) 245-0140

Dated: #t¥/.t r_.

By:~ Michelle Pardoll Assistant Attorney General Florida Bar No. 0073915 Office Of The Attorney General Consumer Protection Division 11 0 S.E. 6'h Street, 1 01h Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 712-4600

Dated: ...(I). c. /1? 7 'I I

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

SO ORDERED. Approved and Entered in Chambers in Palm Beach County. Florida this

By:

17

D? /lf1 Initials

Page 18: v.file/ASAP+Tech.pdf · 2018-07-19 · SCOPE OF CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Office of the Attorney

cc:

Michelle Pardoll, Esquire [email protected] Assistant Attorney General Florida Bar No. 0073915 • Office of the Attorney General Consumer Protection Division II 0 S.E. 6111 Street, I 0111 Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 712-4665

Marshall A. Adams, Esquire [email protected] Florida Bar No. 712426 Bernard M. Cassidy, Esquire [email protected] Florida Bar No.: ooq<(3<)" I 200 South Andrews A venue Suite 900 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-880-9500

18

\??)1;11} Initials