uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

13

Upload: alen-sogolj

Post on 23-Dec-2014

163 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13
Page 2: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Traditional notional definitions of parts of speechDefinitions based on the meaning of the

expressions being classified, not on their grammatical properties.

E.g., the notional definition of the noun and verb = nouns name persons, places and things; verbs are concerned with describing the action or state, i.e. with ‘doing things’.

E.g., to determine whether a word is a noun, one asks what it means or denotes; to determine the tense of a verb, one asks in what time period it locates the action or state expressed by the verb, etc.

Page 3: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Traditional notional definitions of parts of speechTraditional definitions – criticised by linguistsEx., traditionally, preterite is defined as a

tense expressing past action or state:1. (a) The finals started yesterday.(b) You said the finals started tomorrow.2. (a) I gave them his address.(b) I regret giving them his address.The notional definition gives the wrong

results in both the (b) examples.

Page 4: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Traditional notional definitions of parts of speechDefinitions are supposed to give necessary and

sufficient conditions for belonging to some category, and the notional definitions for the preterite given above fails completely.

(1b) shows that past time reference is not necessary for a word to be a preterite verb form, and (2b) shows that it is not sufficient either.

The problem is that the relation between the grammatical category of tense (form) and the semantic category of time (meaning) is highly complex, and the notional definition assumes that the form can be defined directly in terms of meaning.

Page 5: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Traditional notional definitions of parts of speechThe traditional definition of noun – also

unsatisfactory.The problem – the concept of ‘thing’, or

‘name’, is too vague to provide a workable criterion.

E.g. there are many abstract nouns such as absence, fact, flaw, idea, indeterminacy, lack, necessity, etc., so ‘thing’ cannot be intended as equivalent to ‘physical object’.

Page 6: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Traditional notional definitions of parts of speech3. (a) I was annoyed at their rejection of my

proposals.(b) I was annoyed that they rejected my proposals.These sentences have essentially the same

meaning, but rejection is a noun, and rejected a verb.

These two words figure in quite different grammatical constructions.

E.g. rejection vs. rejectionsE.g. rejected vs. rejectE.g., transitive verbs like reject take a direct

object, while nouns do not.E.g., rejected takes a nominative subject (they),

rejection takes a determiner like possessive their.

Page 7: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Grammatical criteria for defining parts of speech (word classes)A satisfactory definition or explanation of

concepts like noun or preterite must identify grammatical properties that distinguish them from the concepts with which they contrast.

The discussion of rejection and rejected illustrated some of the major ways in which nouns differ from verbs.

We assign words to their various classes on grammatical grounds, i.e. according to their properties in entering phrasal and clausal structure.

Page 8: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Grammatical criteria for defining parts of speech (word classes)E.g., determiners (the, a , that, etc.) link up

with nouns to form noun phrases as in a girl; Pronouns can replace noun phrases as in “I

saw a girl and I asked her the time.”

Page 9: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Closed and open word classesWords fall into two broad categories: closed

and open.The category of closed word classes comprises

classes that are finite (and often small) with a relatively stable and unchanging membership.

Words that belong to closed classes play a major part in English grammar, and often correspond to inflections in some other languages. They are sometimes referred to as ‘grammatical words’, ‘structure words’, or ‘function words’.

Page 10: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Closed and open word classesThe open classes of words are constantly

changing their membership as old words drop out of the language and new ones are coined or adopted to reflect cultural changes in society. They are often called ‘lexical words’.

Page 11: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Closed classesPronoun: she, they, anybody, etc.Determiner: the, a , some, those, etc.Primary verb: be, have, doModal auxiliary verb: can, may, shall, will,

must, etc.Preposition: in, during, round, etc.Conjunction: and, or, while, yet, etc.

Page 12: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Open classesNoun: girl, idea, table, Gloria, etc.Adjective: sufficient, happy, round, etc.Full lexical verbs: grow, play, interrogate,

etc.Adverb: sufficiently, really, afterwards, yet,

etc.

Page 13: Uvod u morfosintaksu, lecture 01, 12 13

Other categories of wordsNumerals: three, sixty-five, etc.Interjections: oh, wow, etc.A word may belong to more than class, like

for example roundE.g. Drive round the corner. round =

preposition