uv_filtration decision ppt final (5) 09-08-06
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
1/14
1
Water TreatmentDecision
Stakeholders Panel
August 6, 2009
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
2/14
2
Stakeholders Panel
Your role Understand Tacoma Waters treatment decision
Why we must act
Options
Benefits & risks
Impacts
Help shape communication messages Provide feedback to the Public Utility Board
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
3/14
3
Why Additional Treatment?
Tacom as G re en Ri ver wat er sup ply i sunfiltered Failing to me et an y o f 1 2 leg al requirem ents
(crit er ia t o remain unf il tered) trig gers f iltratio nFed er al la w r equi re s: Treatment o f Cryptosporidium in unf il teredsur face w at er sup pli es t o:
Reduce incidents of cryptosporidiosis agastrointestinal illness caused by ingestion ofCryptosporidium
Reduce exposure to other pathogens like Giardia thatcan co-occur with Cryptosporidium
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
4/14
4
Green River Treatment Plant Location
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
5/14
5
Treatment Option 1 UV Light
How ul tr avio let li gh t works
Ultraviolet (UV) light treatment exposesdisease-causing organisms to high levels ofphoton energy at particular wavelengthssterilizing organisms reproductive DNA,making them unable to replicate and cause
disease in humans.
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
6/14
6
Utility Impacts - UV Treatment
Benefits Regulatory compliance
Lowest initial capital &
operational costs If clearwells are constructed,
associated water storagewould improve reliability &
emergency response
Ri sks Filtration might be required
later
Can create significantoperational challenges
Future water supply mayhave increased organic
material with higherdisinfection byproducts UV will not be beneficial.
Provides no response tochanging water quality
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
7/14
7
How UV Light Impacts You
Cost Approximately
$70 million
(-30% /+50%)
System-wide rate
increase between
5-10%
Ri sks No reduction in
disinfection byproducts
No benefits for taste,
smell, or appearance
Filtration may be
required later causing
even higher rates
Yellow water willcontinue to seasonallyoccur, be visible to youand impact privatefiltration systems.
Benefits Protects public
health through
additional
disinfection
Legal
compliance
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
8/14
8
Treatment Option 2 - Filtration
How fi ltr ati on works Adding specific chemicals to the water supply
causes particles and harmful organisms likeCryptosporidium to stick together into largerparticles that are captured in a six-foot filter of sandand sand-like material. After filtering chemicals,contaminants and sediments, we would disinfect,
then serve clean water to you.
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
9/14
9
Utility Impacts - Filtration
Benefits Legal compliance
Broad protection ofpublic health
Positions utility to meetfuture regulations
Handle a wider-range ofwater quality issues
Increase reliable supplyfrom the Green Rive
Ability to respond toproblematic water quality
Ri sks Rate increase to customers
Waste removal = more $
Some operationalcomplexity
Increases competition for$ among other watersystem needs
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
10/14
10
How Filtration Impacts YouCo sts Approx. $140
million(-30%/+50%)
System-widerate increaseapprox. 15-20%
Ri sks Higher impact
on rates thanUV
Benefits Broad public health
protection
Reduces sand/silt insystem & cost forflushing
Reduces yellow water
Increases available
water during fall &early winter
Legal compliance
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
11/14
11
Schedule
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Conclusion ofCryptosporidium
Advertiseconsulting
services RFP for
Installation deadlinew/2-year extension
Public
Public Utility Board& RWSS Partner
Anticipatedoperation ofFish Passage
Environmentalreview, WaterTreatment Plant
WaterTreatment
Treatmentplant
RWSS Partners = CovingtonWater District, City of Kent &
CityCouncilbudget &
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
12/14
12
Schedule2008
Conclusion of Cryptomonitoring
2009
Water treatment pilot testingbegins
Hire consultant to help examineoptions
Public outreach/education
2010
Public Utility Board & RWSSPartner decision
City Council budget & ratesapproval
Water treatment pilot testing
ends
Treatment plant design &
permitting begins
2011
Environmental review begins
2012 Treatment plant design &
permitting ends
2013
Construction begins
2014 Environmental review ends
Installation deadline w/2yr ext.
2015
Anticipated operation of FishPassage at Howard Hanson
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
13/14
13
Summary
Tacoma Water must build additional treatmentfacilities to meet new federal requirements. The
Public Utility Board will decide betweenfiltration and ultraviolet light treatment. Either
option will significantly impact rates.
The Stakeholder panel plays a key role inproviding feedback to help the Utility Board
make its decision.
-
8/14/2019 UV_Filtration Decision PPT FINAL (5) 09-08-06
14/14
14
Whats Next?
Next Stakeholders Panel Meeting
Monday, August 31, 2009
11:30 a.m. to 1 p .m.
Agenda
Public Outreach Plan
Messaging/sample print collateral