UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Switching during commercial breaks

van Meurs, A

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):van Meurs, A. (1999). Switching during commercial breaks.

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Download date: 04 May 2020

References

Abernethy, A.M. (1990). Television exposure: Programs vs. advertising. Current Issues and

Research in Advertising, 1/2, 61-77. AGB. (1985). Channel switching by homes with three seconds persistence meters. London:

Author. AGF. (1997). Reichweiten während der Werbung: Eine Studie der GfK Fernsehforschung

im Auftrag der AGF [Changes in ratings during commercial breaks: A study by GfK Television Research for AGF1. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Author.

Aitchison, D. (1985). Channel Switching. London: Institute of Practitioners in Advertising,

London: AGB. Alders, P. (1997). Zap .... weg reclamebereik: Een studie naar reclamevermijding [Zap ....

away with commercial reach: A study of commercial avoidancel. Unpublished mas­ter's thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Alwin, L.F., & Prabhaker, P.R. (1992). Functional and belief dimensions of attitude to television advertising: Implications for copytesting. Journal of Advertising Research, 5, 30-42.

Analyse: SPOT onderzoekt samen met adverteerders gedrag van TV-kijker [Analysis: SPOT

and advertisers investigate TV viewer behaviour]. (1995). Focus, 2, 4-5. Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London:

Methuen. Asociación Espanola de Anunciantes. (1995). Nota de prensa [Press release]. Madrid,

Spain: Author. Bakker, S. (1995). "Zap-onderzoek" Weekbladpers is pleidooi voor multimedia-planning

[The Weekbladpers "zap research" is an argument for multimedia planning]. Adfor-

matie 25, p. 85. Barwise, P. & Ehrenberg, A. (1988). Television and its audience. London: Sage. Bauer, R.A. (1964). The obstinate audience: The influence process from the point of view of

social communication. American Psychologist, 19, 319-328 Behaviour and Attitudes Ltd. (1987). Zipping and zapping: Barometer check. Report pre­

pared for The Association of Advertisers in Ireland. Dublin, Ireland: Author. Bekkers, W. (1992). Experiments in the measurement of TV audience reactions. In World­

wide broadcast audience research symposium, 539-552. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF

Berg, H. Van den, & Rüster, R. (1992). Zapp en weg waren ze. Een onderzoek naar

het vermijden van televisiereclame [Zapp and then they were gone. A study of the avoidance of television ads]. Unpublished master's thesis, Catholic University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Billet Consultancy Ltd. (1992). The zapper and the advertiser: A study of ITV viewers.

London: Author. Blikken Braakbal naar Vizir-reclame ["Tin-plate pellet" award for Vizir commercial].

(1997). Algemeen Dagblad, December 22, page number unknown. Boelé, F., & Niekerk, P. Van (1995). Effectiviteit TV-reclame, aanzet voor een TV-

2 2 5

Switching during commercial breaks

reclamebeleid [Effectiveness of TV advertising, the basis for a TV advertising policy,]. Amsterdam: VEA Nederlandse Vereniging van Erkende ReclameAdviesbureaus.

Boon, A.K. Den. (1994). The reliability of television audience ratings. In Worldwide elec­tronic and broadcast audience research symposium, 181-202. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF.

Boon, A.K. Den. & Wedel, M. (1997). Validiteit en betrouwbaarheid van kijkcijfers:

Onderzoek naar de kijkdichtheidsgegevens van het Continu Kijkonderzoek van

Intomart [The validity and reliability of ratings: An examination of the audience rat­ings data from Intomart 's continuous television audience research]. Amsterdam: Mediacommissie van de BVA Associatie van Nederlandse Adverteerders.

Bozell. (1992). The dimensions of TV clutter and its impact on viewers. New York: Bozell. Breemhaar, M. (1992). Goede tijden, slechte tijden . . . ? Een onderzoek naar veranderingen

in het televisiekijkgedrag in Nederland en de invloed op de effectiviteit van televisie

reclame [Good times, bad times . . . ? A study of changes in television viewing behav­iour in the Netherlands and its impact on the efficacy of television advertising]. Un­published master's thesis, Catholic University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Brounts, B. (1996). Ruim eenderde van bevolking staat negatief tegenover TV-reclame [More than a third of the population has a negative attitude towards TV advertising], Adformatie, 19, p. 44.

Bunn, D.W. (1982). Audience presence during breaks in television programs. Journal of

Advertising Research, 5, 35-39. Capocasa, A., Denon, L., & Lucchi, R. (1985). Understanding audiences of TV commercial

breaks, what people do, how they react, how much they recall. In Seminar on broad­

casting and research, 81-109. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF.

Cobb-Walgren, C.J. (1990). The changing commercial climate. Current issues and research

in advertising, 1/2, 343-368. Cronin, J.J. & Menelly, N.E. (1992). Discrimination vs. avoidance: "Zipping" of television

commercials. Journal of Advertising, 2, 1-7 (reprint). Cuilenburg, J.J. Van. (1998a). Het spel der krachten en machten [The balance of power]. In

MediaWerkGroep (Ed.), De kracht van de (on)macht, 17-28. Amsterdam: Author.

Cuilenburg, J.J. Van. (1998b). In search of new knowledge for communications design and policy. Trends in communication, 5, 7-16.

Cunningham, F. (1992). Channel switching: Together or alone? In Nielsen Media Research (Ed.), Television Audience 1991, 50-60. New York: Author.

Danaher, P.J. (1995). What happens to television ratings during commercial breaks? Jour­

nal of Advertising Research, 2, 37-47.

Danaher, P.J., & Bead, T.W. (1994). Unobtrusive measures of television audiences during commercial breaks: People-meter second by second ratings. In Worldwide electronic

and broadcast audience research symposium, 439-452.Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF.

Dronkers, G. (1993). De programmering: Over de invloed van televisieprogramma's op het

kijkgedrag tijdens reclameblokken [Programming: The influence of television pro­grammes on viewing behaviour during commercial breaks]. Unpublished master's the­sis, University of Amsterdam.

DuPlessis, E. (1994). Understanding and using likeability. Journal of Advertising Research,

5, RC3-RC10.

Elliot, Ph. (1973). Uses and Gratifications research: A critique and a sociological alterna­tive. In Sveriges Radio, Audience and Programme Research Department (Ed.), Uses

and gratifications studies: Theory and methods, 145-179. Stockholm: Sveriges Radio.

2 2 6

Contents

Faasse, J.H. (1994). Measuring the Effectiveness of Twin Commercials as a Way of Stand­ing Out Amidst the Clutter. In Worldwide electronic and broadcast audience research

symposium, 149-162. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF.

Feinberg, B.M. (1989). Zapping is just a new zip to an old flip. Marketing news, 7, p. 17. Ferguson, D.A. & Perse, E.M. (1993). Media and Audience Influences on Channel Reper­

toire, journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 1, 31-47. Frank, B. (1984). Television. And now a word from our ... Zap (revisited). Marketing &

Media Decisions, 9, 162-166.

Franzen, G. (1994). Advertising effectiveness: Findings from empirical research. Henley on Thames, United Kingdom: N.T.C. Publications.

Franzen, G. (1995). TV-irritatie veroorzaakt door overmaat en kijkdwang [Irritation with TV due to excessive and forced exposure]. Adformatie, 5, p. 14.

Frissen, V. (1992). Veelkijken als sociaal handelen [Heavy viewing as a social act]. Unpub­lished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Gehner, W. (1993). Kijkdichtheid van spotposities: Een onderzoek naar de verschillen in

kijkdichtheid van spotposities binnen reclameblokken op televisie [Spot position rat­ings: A study of differences in ratings for spot positions during commercial breaks on television!. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Gerbner, G. (1979). Television's influence on values and behaviour. Massacommunicatie, 6,

215-222. Gilmore, R.F. & Secunda, E. (1993). Zipped TV commercials boost prior learning. Journal

of Advertising Research, 6, 28-38.

Greene, W.F. (1988). Maybe the valley of the shadow is not so dark after all. Journal of

Advertising Research, 5, 11-15. Gullen, P. (1994). Who is really watching the commercials? In Worldwide electronic and

broadcast audience research symposium Vol. 2, 109-118. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF.

Goodhardt, G.J., Ehrenberg, A.S.C. & Collins, M.A. (1975). The Television Audience: Pat­

terns of Viewing. Westmead, United Kingdom: Saxon House. Haak, K. Van der & Snippenburg, L. Van. (1998). The Dutch broadcasting system. In L.

D'Haenens & F. Saeys (Eds.), Media dynamics & regulatory concerns in the digital

age, 157-179. Berlin: Quintessens.

Harderwijk, R. Van. (1993). Spotposities binnen reclameblokken op de televisie [Spot posi­tions in commercial breaks on television]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Hasebrink, U. Von & Krotz, F. (1993). Wie nutzen die Zuschauer das Fernsehen? [How do viewers use television?]. Media Perspectiven, 11/12, 515-528.

Hawkins, R.P., Reynolds, N . & Pingree, S. (1991). In search of television viewing styles. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 3, 375-383.

Heeter, C , & Greenberg, B.S. (1985). Profiling the zappers. Journal of Advertising Re­

search, 2, 15-19. Hendriksen, P.M. (1979). Omroepen in de woestijn [Broadcasting in the wilderness].

Massacommunicatie, 2, 55-66. Hendriksen, P.M. (1993). De omroep-woestijn herbezocht [The broadcasting wilderness re­

visited]. Massacommunicatie, 4, 254-261.

Hendriksen, P.M. (1998). The square circle of Dutch public service broadcasting. In EBV

diffusion summer 1998, 31-33.

227

Switching during commercial breaks

Horsley, C. (1986). A quantified study on what people do during commercial breaks. In Seminar on new developments in media research, 23-34. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF.

Hörzu Funkuhr (1992). Seherqualität II: Eine Studie zur Wirkungsbilanz des Werbefernse­

hens [Viewer quality II: A study of the effects of television advertising]. Hamburg, Germany: Author.

Initiatief Vea tegen "overkill" TV-reclame [Vea initiative against TV advertising overkill]. (1994). Adformatic, 44, p. 1, 4.

Interview. (1998). Levensstijlonderzoek 1998: In opdracht van Weekbladpers Tijdschriften

[Life style survey 1998: Commissioned by Weekbladpers Tijdschriften]. Amsterdam: Author.

Intomart. (1994). Basisondervraging radio 1994-1995 [Radio establishment survey 1994-1995]. Hilversum, the Netherlands: Author.

Intomart. (1995a). Kwaliteit van televisiekijkgedrag: In opdracht van The Media Partner­

ship [The quality of television viewing behaviour: Commissioned by The Media Part­nership]. Hilversum, the Netherlands: Author.

Intomart. (1995b). Onderzoek naar schakelgedrag: Literatuuronderzoek [Research on switching behaviour: Literature search]. Hilversum, the Netherlands: Author.

Intomart. (1996a). Schakelonderzoek: In opdracht van SPOT [Research on switching be­haviour: Commissioned by SPOT]. Hilversum, the Netherlands: Author.

Intomart. (1996b). Schakelonderzoek: Tabelrapport [Research on switching behaviour: Book of tables[. Hilversum, the Netherlands: Author.

Intomart. (1998a). Basisondervraging radio 1998-1999 [Radio establishment survey 1998-1999]. Hilversum, the Netherlands: Author.

Intomart. (1998b). Continuous TV audience survey in the Netherlands: A methodological description. Hilversum, the Netherlands: Author.

IP. (1996). Key facts Television 1996. Peaktime: Neuilly sur Seine Cedex, France. ITV Network Centre. (1993). I can't believe it's clutter: A major study into the effects non-

programme editorial items on the audience to commercial breaks. London: Author. Jongeren zeggen dat ze reclame zappen, maar ze doen het niet [Young people say they zap

ads, but they do not do it]. (1997). Adformatie, 39, p. 1, 4. Jongeren '97: Jeugd vermijdt reclame [Youth '97: Youth avoids advertising]. (1997).

Nieuwstribune, 14, p. 6.

Kaplan, B.M. (1985). Zapping: the real issue is communication, journal of Advertising Re­

search, 2, 9-12.

Katz, E. & Lazersfeld, P.F. (1955). Personal influence. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Kent, R.J. (1995). Competitive Clutter in Network Advertising: Current Levels and Adver­

tiser Responses. Journal of Advertising research, 1/2, 49-57.

Kitchen, P.J. (1985). The effects of VCRs and remote control on behaviour during commer­cial breaks. Admap, 1, 28-33.

Kitchen, P.J., & Yorke, D.A. (1986). Commercial television breaks, consumer behaviour, and new technology: An initial analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 20, 40-53.

Kneale, D. (1988). Zapping of TV ads appears pervasive. Wall Street Journal, April 25,

page number unknown. Kubey, R.W. (1986). Television Use in Everyday Life: Coping with Unstructured Time.

Journal of Communication, 2, 108-123.

228

Contents

Laar, A. Van der, & Breemhaar, M. (1991). Het gebruik van televisie en attitudes t.a.v. televisie-reclame [The use of television and attitudes towards television advertising]. In VNU Tijdschriftengroep/Admedia (Ed.), Blad/Dossier, 1. Amstelveen, the Netherlands: Author.

Lee, S., & Lumpkin, J.R. (1992). Differences in attitude toward TV advertising: VCR usage as a moderator. International Journal of Advertising, 4, 333-342.

Levy, M.R., & Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clari­fication and exploration. Communication research, 1, 51-78.

Levy, M.R., & Windahl, S. (1985). The concept of audience activity. In K.E. Rosengren, L.A. Wenner & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research, 109-122. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Ligthart, J. (1998). Programmering vergroot bereik televisiereclame [Programming in­creases television advertising reach]. Adformatie, 8, p. 58.

Ligthart, J., & Meurs, A. Van. (1997). Achter de schermen van de kijkcijfers [Behind the scenes of television ratings]. Amsterdam: SPOT.

Mane, LS. (1993). The dynamics of TV viewing behaviour: A framework for analysis of grazing. In Nielsen Media Research (Ed.), Television Audience 1992, 50-60. New York: Author.

McNeill, P. & Sterrenburg, D. (1995). 1995 Wordt wel een goed TV-jaar [1995 Is going to be a great TV year]. Adformatie 4, p. 15.

McQuail, D. (1997). Audience analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

McSherry, J. (1985). The current scope of channel switching. Marketing and Media Deci­

sions, 8, 144-146. Media data: Internationaal onderzoek naar reclamevermijdend televisie-kijkgedrag [Media

data: International research on the avoidance of television advertising]. (1995). Adfo-

medianieuws, 8, 1-4. Metzger, G. (1986). Contam's VCR research. Journal of Advertising Research, 6, rc8-rcl2. Meurs, A. Van. (1994). The future at your fingertips: Towards an automated forecasting

model for television ratings. In Worldwide electronic and broadcast audience research

symposium, 497-512. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF.

Meurs, A. Van. (1995). Mind the gap: Forecasting audience retainment during commercial breaks. In Global Media Research Workshop, 353-375. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF.

Meurs, A. Van. (1998a). Televisie: Continu Kijkonderzoek [Television: Continuous Audi­ence Research]. In A.K. Den Boon & P.C. Neijens (Eds.), Media & reclame: Editie

1998-1999, 273-295. Groningen, the Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff. Meurs, A. Van. (1998b). When every second counts: Looking into the effects of a 15 second

persistence threshold on audience ratings. In Worldwide electronic and broadcast

audience research symposium, 239-246. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF. Meurs, A. Van. (1998c). De wispelturige kijker: Veranderingen in het kijk- en

schakelgedrag [The fickle viewer: Changes in viewing and switching behaviour]. In V. Frissen & H. te Molder (Eds.), Van forum tot supermarkt? Consumenten en burgers in

de informatiesamenleving, 47-59. Leuven, Belgium: ACCO.

Meurs, A. Van. (1998d). Zapp! A study on switching behaviour during commercial breaks. Journal of Advertising Research, 1, 43-53.

Meurs, A. Van. (1998e). Zapp! - oder das unstete Publikum: Fakten zum Umschaltverhalten während Werbeblöcken [Zapp! - or the restless public: Facts about switching behav­iour during commercial breaks]. In: Media Trend Journal, 9, 28-33.

Meurs, A. Van, & Ligthart, J. (1996). Zapp! A study on switching behaviour during com-

2 2 9

Switching during commercial breaks

mercial breaks. In Worldwide electronic and broadcast audience research symposium,

329-348. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF. Meurs, A. Van, & Sijtsma, P. (1994). Aandacht voor televisie [Paying attention to televi­

sion]. Onderzoek, 10, 24-27.

Meyer, G. De, Hendriks, A., & Fauconnier, G. (1989). Zappen. Een onderzoek naar het veranderd televisiekijkgedrag tengevolge van het gebruik van afstandsbediening [Zap­ping. A study of changes in television viewing behaviour resulting from the use of the remote control]. Communicatie, 2, 1-5.

MGM. (1994). Wie häufig schalten die Zuschauer um? [How much do viewers switch channels?]. Munich, Germany: Author.

Mittal, B. (1994). Public assessment of TV advertising: Faint praise and harsh criticism. Journal of Advertising Research, 1, 35-53.

Nakra, P. (1991). Zapping nonsense: Should television media planners lose sleep over it? International Journal of Advertising, 3, 217-222.

Neijens, P.C., & Smit, E.G. (1998). Onderzoek naar bereikskwaliteit [A study of reach qualityl. In A.K. Den Boon & P.C. Neijens (Eds.), Media & reclame: Editie 1998-

1999, 413-438. Groningen, the Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.

Neuman, W.R., & Pool, I. De Sola. (1986). The flow of communication into the home. In S. Ball-Rokeach Sc M. Cantor (Eds.), Media, audience and social structure, 71-86. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Norusis, M.J. (1990). SPSS/PC+ Statistics 4.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc. NOS KLO. (1998). Bezit A\'-apparatuur en ontvangst zenders 1997 [Ownership of audio

visual equipment and channels received 1997]. Hilversum, the Netherlands: Author. Olney, T.J., Holbrook, M.B., & Batra, R. (1991). Consumer responses to advertising: The

effects of ad content, emotions, and attitude toward the ad on viewing time. Journal of

Consumer Research, 4, 440-453. Oomens, W.J., Roest, H.C.A., & Vaessen, M.A. (1993). Schakelgedrag op de Nederlandse

televisie [Switching behaviour and Dutch television]. Tijdschrift voor Marketing, 12,

51-57. Os, M. Van. (1995a). Zappen en HMG: Mediabureaus kritisch [Zapping and the HMG:

Media agencies are critical]. Adformatie, 20, p. 12-14. Os, M. Van. (1995b). IAA's pro-reclamecampagne staat los van debat over TV-irritatie

[IAA's pro-advertising campaign is not linked to the debate on TV irritation]. Adfor­

matie, 21, p. 22.

Ottler, S. (1998). Zapping. Zum selektiven Umgang mit Fernsehwerbung und dessen Be­

deutung für die Vermarktung von Fernsehwerbezeit [Zapping. Selective exposure of television advertising and the implications for the marketing of commercial breaks]. Munich, Germany: Verlag Reinhard Fisher.

Ottler, S. & Baldauf, S. (1997). Das Märchen von der Zapp-Manie [The zap mania fairy

tale]. Tele Images, 1, 18-21. Ottler, S. & Schenk, M. (1998). Und der Werbekiller geht doch nicht um [The ad killer is

not on the loose after all]. Tele Images, 1/2, 26-30. Palmgreen, P. & Rayburn, J.D. (1985). An expectancy-value approach to media gratifica­

tions. In K.E. Rosengren, L.A. Wenner & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications re­

search, 61-72. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Perse, E.M. (1990). Audience Selectivity and Involvement in the Newer Media Environ­

ment. Communication Research, 5, 675-697.

Platform '95. (1998). Themadossier mediabeleving [Special dossier media experience]. Am­sterdam: Author.

230

Contents

Potter, W.J., Forrest, E., Sapolsky, B.S. & Ware, W. (1988). Segmenting VCR Owners. Journal of Advertising Research, 2, 29-39.

Price, V. & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 133-164.

Rakshit, P. (1990). Measurement of audience for TV commercials in India. Journal of the

Market Research Society, 2, 197-206. Read, S. (1993). The bits between the programmes. Paper presented at the MRG Confer­

ence, Amsterdam. Reclame-vermijdend gedrag bestaat [Advertising avoidance behaviour does exist]. (1995).

Nieuwstribune, 25, p. 6.

Research International (1994). Het zappen van TV reklame in 1994 [The zapping of televi­sion commercials in 1994]. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Author.

Rich, T., Owens, D. & Ellenboge, J. (1978). What Canadians disliked about TV commer­cials. Journal of Advertising Research, 6, 37-44.

Saris, W.E. (1988). Variation in response functions: A source of measurement error in atti­

tude research. Amsterdam: Sociometrie research foundation. Saris, W.E. & Stronkhorst, L.H. (1984). Causal modelling in nonexperimental research: An

introduction to the L1SREL approach. Amsterdam: Sociometrie research foundation. Sat.l SatellitenFernsehen GmbH. (1997). Sehbeteiligungen bei Unterbreckerwerbung

[Viewing behaviour during commercial breaks]. Mainz, Germany: Author.

Siddarth, S. & Chattopadhyay, A. (1998). To zap or not to zap: A study of the determi­nants of channel switching during commercials. Marketing Science, 2, 124-138.

Smit, E. (1999). Mass media advertising: Information or wallpaper? Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.

SPOT. (1996a). Onderzoek naar schakelgedrag [A study of switching behaviour]. Amster­dam: Author.

SPOT. (1996b). TV-plannen met productdoelgroepen: Verslagen van de bijeenkomst

gehouden op 25 maart 1996 in Artis Partycentrum, Amsterdam [Television planning with product target groups: Report of the meeting held on March 25, 1996 at Artis Partycentre, Amsterdam]. Amsterdam: Author.

Stappers, J.G. (1983). Massacommunicatie. Een inleiding [Mass communication. An intro­duction]. Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers.

Stockmann, L. (1991). Het TV-publiek is er niet altijd met de gedachten bij [The TV audi­ence is not always paying attention]. Nieuwstribune, 3, p. 39.

Stockmann, L. (1993). Reclame minder populair onder Nederlandse jeugd [Advertising is loosing popularity among Dutch youth]. Nieuwstribune, 36, p. 26.

SUMMO. (1995). Uitkomsten van het doelgroepen onderzoek (DGO) [Results of the target groups research]. Amsterdam: SUMMO.

Sylvester, A.K. (1990). Controlling remote. Marketing & Media Decisions, 2, p. 54. TV-irritatie stijgt dramatisch [Irritation with TV increases dramatically]. (1995). Adfor-

matie, 29/30, p. 1, 4.

Twyman, T. & Wilcox, S. (1996). The Variability of Audience Measurement Data and How to Live with It. In Worldwide electronic and broadcast audience research sympo­

sium, 139-168. Amsterdam: ESOMAR, New York: ARF. Verwey, M. (1986). Verklaring kijkfrequentie TV-actualiteitenrubrieken: Een causale

analyse [Accounting for the viewing frequency of television news and current affairs programmes: A causal analysis]. Massacommunicatie, 2-3, 144-155.

Vierkant, P. (1987). Televisiekijkers in Nederland. Een onderzoek naar het televisie

kijkgedrag van de Nederlandse bevolking [Television viewers in the Netherlands. A

2 3 1

Switching during commercial breaks

study of Dutch television viewing behaviour]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uni­versity of Groningen, the Netherlands.

Vioen, M. (1995). A.B. Het televisie-alfabet van de zapper: Een onderzoek naar de

gemiddelde proporties die van reclameblokken en programma's worden gezien [A.B. The television alphabet of the zapper: A study of the average proportions seen of pro­grammes and commercial breaks]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Webster, J.G. (1985). Program Audience Duplication: A Study of Television Inheritance Ef­fects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2, 121-133.

Webster, J.G. & Wakshlag, J.J. (1983). A theory of television program choice. Communica­

tion Research, 4, 430-446. Weekbladpers. (1996). 3 996 Rankingboek: Een publicatie uit de Summoscanner 1995

[1996 Ranking book: A publication from the SUMMO scanner 1995]. Amsterdam, Author.

Weibul, L. (1985). Structural factors in gratifications research. In K.E. Rosengren, L.A. Wenner & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research, 123-148. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Weimann, G. (1995). Zapping in the Holy land: Coping with multi-channel TV in Israel. Journal of Communication, 1, 96-102.

Wichers, L. (1996). Publieksonderzoek zap-gedrag Nederlandse bevolking, 2'' kwartaal

1996 [Audience research on the zapping behaviour in the Dutch population, 2nJ quar­ter 1996]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Department of Communication Studies.

Yorke, D.A., & Kitchen, P.J. (1985). Channel flickers and video speeders. Journal of Adver­

tising Research, 2, 21-25. Zal reclame overleven? [Will advertising survive?]. (1994). Nieuwstribune Special, Novem­

ber 24, 1-27. Zufryden, F.S., Pedrick, B.M., & Sankaralingam, A. (1993). Zapping and its impact on

brand purchase behaviour. Journal of Advertising Research, 1, 58-66.

232