utran radio resource managementutran radio resource · pdf fileutran radio resource...
TRANSCRIPT
UTRAN Radio Resource ManagementUTRAN Radio Resource Management
IntroductionHandover Control
Soft/Softer HandoverInter Frequency HandoverBTS 3 Inter Frequency HandoverCell Selection/Re-selection
Power Control
BTS 3
Closed Loop Power ControlOpen Loop Power Control
Load ControlBTS 2UE
Load Control
Call Admission ControlCongestion ControlBTS 1
Packet Data Transmission
Packet Data ControlDynamic SchedulingDynamic Scheduling
References
H Holma A Toskala (Ed ) “WCDMA for UMTS” Wiley 4th edition Wiley 2007H. Holma, A. Toskala (Ed.), WCDMA for UMTS , Wiley, 4th edition, Wiley, 2007Walke, Althoff, Seidenberg: UMTS – Ein Kurs. J. Schlembach Fachverlag, 2001
H. Kaaranen, et.al., “UMTS Networks: Architecture, Mobility and Services”, Wiley, 2001. (see chapter 4)
A. Viterbi: “CDMA: Principles of Spread Spectrum Communications,” Addison Wesley, 1995.y,
J. Laiho, A. Wacker, T. Novosad (ed.): “Radio Network Planning and Optimisation for UMTS,“ Wiley, 2001
T Ojanperä R Prasad “Wideband CDMA for Third Generation MobileT. Ojanperä, R. Prasad, Wideband CDMA for Third Generation Mobile Communication”, Artech House, 1998.
R. Prasad, W. Mohr, W. Konhäuser, “Third Generation Mobile Communications S t ” A t h H M h 2000Systems”, Artech House, March 2000.
3GPP standards:3GPP standards:
TS 25.214: “Physical Layer Procedures“ (esp. power control)TR 25.922: “Radio Resource Management Strategies“
UMTS Networks 2Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
TR 25.942: “RF System Scenarios“
UMTS – Context of Radio Resource Management
System evaluation and standardisation activities on three levels:
• Access Network (Architecture)• Mobility Management
UTRANInterfaces Architecture y gArchitecture
• Cellular Network Aspects (Layer 2&3) • Radio Resource Management
Cellular Network Protocols
R di Li k (Ph i l L )• Radio Link (Physical Layer)
UMTS Networks 3Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
RRM – High-Level Requirements
Efficient use of limited radio resources (spectrum, power, code space)Minimizing interference Flexibility regarding services (Quality of Service, user behaviour)Simple algorithms requiring small signalling overhead onlyStability and overload protectionStability and overload protectionSelf adaptive in varying environmentsAllow interoperability in multi-vendor environments
Radio Resource Management algorithms control thealgorithms control the efficient use of resources with respect to interdependent objectives:interdependent objectives:-- cell coverage-- cell capacity-- quality of service
UMTS Networks 4Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
q y
RRM – Components
R di R M t
non-accessstratum
Radio Resource Management
Packet DataC t l
LoadC t l
HandoverC t l
typically in RNC
ControlControlControl
MediumAccess
PowerC t l typically in Access
ControlControl yp y
NodeB
Physical layer
UMTS Networks 5Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Example of Coverage and Best Server Map
p ap
rage
ma
erve
r m
a
cove
r
best
se
Application: RF engineering (cell layout) Application: HO decision
UMTS Networks 6Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Legend: red indicates high signal level, yellow indicates low level
Legend: color indicates cell with best CPICH in area
Interference in CDMA Networks
UMTS Networks 7Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Interference in CDMA - Uplink
UMTS Networks 8Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Interference in CDMA - Downlink
UMTS Networks 9Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Cell Breathing
UMTS Networks 10Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Cell Breathing
UMTS Networks 11Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Cell Breathing
coverage coverage coverage
Coverage depending on load: load causes interference which reduces the area where a SIR sufficient for communication can be provided
coverage low load
coverage medium load
coverage high load
UMTS Networks 12Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
yellow area: connection may drop or blocked
Coverage vs. Capacity
Capacity depends on:QoS of the users (data rate error performance (bit-error-rate))QoS of the users (data rate, error performance (bit error rate))User behaviour (activity)Interference (intra- & inter-/noise)Number of carriers/ sectors
Coverage (service area) depends on:Interference (intra- & inter-cell) + noisePathloss (propagation conditions)QoS of the users (data rate error performance (bit error rate))QoS of the users (data rate, error performance (bit-error-rate))
Thus, trade-off between capacity and coverage
UMTS Networks 13Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Coverage vs. Capacity
3
3.513kbps circuit switched service capacity versus maximum cell radius
2
2.5
dius
(km
)
1
1.5←Downlink
Max
imum
cel
l rad
0.5
1
Uplink→
M
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2000
Erlangs (2% GOS)
Downlink limits capacity while uplink limits coverageDownlink depends more on the load (user share total transmit BS power)
UMTS Networks 14Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Handover Control: Basics
General: mechanism of changing a cell or base station during a call or sessionGeneral: mechanism of changing a cell or base station during a call or session
Handover in UMTS:UE may have active radio links to more than one Node BUE may have active radio links to more than one Node BMobile-assisted & network-based handover in UMTS:
UE reports measurements to UTRAN if reporting criteria (which are set by the UTRAN) are metthe UTRAN) are metUTRAN then decides to dynamically add or delete radio links depending on the measurement results
Types of Handover:Soft/Softer Handover (dedicated channels)H d H d ( h d h l )Hard Handover (shared channels)Inter Frequency (Hard) HandoverInter System Handover (e.g. UMTS-GSM)Cell selection/re-selection (inactive or idle)
All handover types require heavy support from the UMTS network infrastructure!
UMTS Networks 15Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Macro Diversity & Soft Handover (Wrap-Up)
NodeB 1NodeB 1NodeB 2NodeB 2
UEUE
Downlink: combining in the mobile station Uplink: combining in the base station and/or radio network controller
UMTS Networks 16Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Uplink: combining in the base station and/or radio network controller
Soft/Softer Handover
In soft/softer handover the UE maintains active radio links to more than one Node BCombination of the signals from multiple active radio links is necessary
Soft HandoverThe mobile is connected to (at least) two cells belonging to different NodeBsI li k th i l bi d i th RNCIn uplink, the signals are combined in the RNC, e.g. by means of selection combining using CRC
Softer HandoverThe mobile is connected to two sectors within one NodeBThe mobile is connected to two sectors within one NodeBMore efficient combining in the uplink is possible like maximum ratio combining (MRC) in the NodeB instead of RNC
Note:In uplink no additional signal is transmitted, while in downlink each new link causes interference to other users, therefore:
Uplink: HO general increase performanceUplink: HO general increase performanceDownlink: Trade-off
UMTS Networks 17Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Soft and Softer Handover in Practice
UMTS Networks 18Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Soft Handover Control
NodeB 1NodeB 1 NodeB 2NodeB 2UEUE
soft handoversoft handoverareaarea
• Measurement quantity, e.g. EC/I0 on CPICHR l ti th h ld δ &
MeasurementMeasurement
NodeB 1NodeB 1 UEUE
• Relative thresholds δadd & δdrop for adding & dropping
• Preservation time Tlink to a oid “ping pong” effects
QuantityQuantityCPICH 1CPICH 1
δδdropdrop avoid “ping-pong” effects• Event triggered measurement
reporting to decrease signalling loadCPICH 2CPICH 2
δδdropdrop
δδaddadd TTlinklink
signalling load
Link to 1Link to 1 Link to 1 & 2Link to 1 & 2 Link to 2Link to 2 timetime
UMTS Networks 19Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Soft Handover – Simulation Results
25%
20%
ility
oppi
ng)
1 link
10%
15%
ge P
roba
bg
and
Dro 1 link
max 2 SHO linksmax 4 SHO links
6 SHO li k
5%
10%
Out
ag(B
lock
in max 6 SHO links
0%5 15 25 35 45 55
Offered Traffic [Erlang per site]
UMTS Networks 20Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Soft handover significantly improves the performance, but …
Soft Handover – Simulation Results II
2
1,5
ve L
inks
1
er o
f Act
iv
0,5
ean
Num
b
01 2 4 6
Me
1 2 4 6
Max. Active Set Size
UMTS Networks 21Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
… the overhead due to simultaneous connections becomes higher!
( CS) H
Inter-Frequency Handover
Hierarchical cell structure (HCS) Hot-spot
Macro Micro Macrof2
f2
Hot spot
Handover f1 ⇔ f2 always needed
f1
f2
f1
Handover f1 ⇔ f2 needed
f1
2f1 f1
1 2 ybetween layers
1 2sometimes at hot spot
Hard handoverInter-frequency measurements of target cell needed in both scenariosq y gMobile-assisted handover (MAHO)
slotted (compressed) mode for inter-frequency measurements to find suitable target cellgalso supports GSM system measurements
Database assisted handover (DAHO)no measurements performed on other frequencies or systems
UMTS Networks 22Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
no measurements performed on other frequencies or systemsuse cell mapping information stored in data base to identify the target cell
Power Control: Basics
C t l th tti f th t it i d tControls the setting of the transmit power in order to:Keep the QoS within the required limits, e.g. data rate, delay and BERMinimise interference, i.e. the overall power consumption
Power control handles:Path Loss (Near-Far-Problem), Shadowing (Log-Normal-Fading) and Fast Fading (Rayleigh- Ricean-Fading)Fast Fading (Rayleigh , Ricean Fading) Environment (delay spread, UE speed, …) which implies different performance of the de-interleaver and decoder
Uplink: per mobileDownlink: per physical channel
Three types of power control:Inner loop power controlOuter loop power control (SIR-target adjustment)O l t l ( ll ti )Open loop power control (power allocation)
Downlink power overload control to protect amplifierGain Clipping (GC)
UMTS Networks 23Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Gain Clipping (GC)Aggregated Overload Control (AOC)
Near-Far Problem
Near-Far Problem:Near Far Problem:• Spreading sequences are not orthogonal
(multi-user interference)• Near mobile dominates
UE 1UE 1
• Near mobile dominates• Signal to interference ratio (SIR) is lower for far
mobiles and performance degradesN d BN d B
The problem can be resolved through dynamic power control to equalize all received power levels
NodeBNodeB
AND/OR: by means of joint multi-user detection (MUD)
UE 2UE 2( )
UMTS Networks 24Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Impact of Power Control
UMTS Networks 25Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Source: H. Holma, A. Toskala (Ed.), “WCDMA for UMTS”,
Closed Loop Power Control
Closed loop power control is used on channels which are established in both directions, such as DCHThe receiver generates transmit power commands (TPC) based on the
i d i d li h C d b k h i i hestimated received quality; the TPC are send back to the transmitter in the opposite directionThe transmit power is adjusted according to the received TPC
ReceiverReceiver DecoderDecoderPAPAUser dataUser dataUser dataUser data
ReceiverReceiver DecoderDecoder
BLERBLER--estimateestimate
PAPA
OuterOuterlooploop
SIRSIR--estimateestimate
BLERBLER estimateestimateTPCTPC
commandscommands
TPCTPCAdjust SIRAdjust SIRtargettarget
Inner loopInner loop
MUXMUXDeMUXDeMUX
TPCTPCcommandscommands
UMTS Networks 26Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Inner/Outer Loop Power Control
Inner Loop Power Control (1500 Hz)objective: adjust transmit power to keep the received SIR at a given SIR targetrealisation using the SIR-estimate after RAKE combining:
if SIRest > SIRtarget, then generate TPC “DOWN”if SIR ≤ SIR then generate TPC “UP”if SIRest ≤ SIRtarget, then generate TPC UP
realisation in base station (nodeB)similar mechanisms for up- and downlink
Outer Loop Power Control (100 Hz max)objective: meet the required reception quality, e.g. average BLERj q p q y, g grealisation using the CRC attachment
if CRC ok, then decrease SIRtarget = SIRtarget – Δdown
if CRC fails then increase SIR SIR + Δif CRC fails, then increase SIRtarget = SIRtarget + Δup
Δdown = Δup × BLERtarget / (1–BLERtarget)realisation in radio network controller (RNC)
UMTS Networks 27Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Power Control Results
7.5
6.5
7IR
[dB]
6
6.5
quire
d UL
S
5.5
Req
PedAVehA
50 20 40 60 80 100 120
Velocity [km/h]
SIR requirement strongly depends on the environment (due to different fast fading conditions – Jakes models)
UMTS Networks 28Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
⇒ outer loop power control needed to adapt SIR
Open Loop Power Control
Open loop power control is used on channels that cannot apply closed loop power control, e.g. RACH, FACHThe transmitter power is determined on the basis of a path loss estimate p pfrom the received power measure of the opposite directionTo avoid excessive interference, probes with incremental power steps until a response is obtained: “power ramping”p p p g
R iR iReceiverReceiver
Measure Rx powerMeasure Rx power
Adjust Tx powerAdjust Tx power
PAPAUser dataUser data
UMTS Networks 29Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Power Ramping during Random Access
Preamble #1 Message
RACH
Preamble #N
AICH/FACH
AcquisitionIndicator
MessageAcknowledgement
Random access on RACH used forInitial accessShort packets: user data, signalling (e.g. measurement reports)S o t pac ets use data, s g a g (e g easu e e t epo ts)
Power RampingMS starts with relatively low transmit powerR t ith i t l t til i iti i di tRepeats with incremental power steps until acquisition indicator receivedMessage sent with constant power offset
UMTS Networks 30Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Load Control: Basics
General limitations in 3rd generation mobile systems:
Li it d t ( d )Limited resources: spectrum, power, (code space)
Not all service requests can be granted
Different types of services in the same cellular environmentDifferent types of services in the same cellular environmentService parameters (user behaviour and QoS) and environmental conditions (propagation) vary over time
CDMA-specific impacts:Coverage in CDMA systems depends on the cell loading:Coverage in CDMA systems depends on the cell loading:“cell breathing”CDMA systems may become unstable in highly loaded situationsdue to fast inner-loop power controldue to fast inner loop power control
UMTS Networks 31Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Load Control
Main objective:Main objective:Avoid overload situations by controlling system loadMonitor and controls radio resources of usersMonitor and controls radio resources of users
Call Admission Control (CAC)Admit or deny new users, new radio access bearers or new radio li klinksAvoid overload situations, e.g. by means of blocking a new callDecisions are based on interference and resource measurementsDecisions are based on interference and resource measurements
Congestion Control (ConC)Monitor, detect and handle overload situations with the already connected usersBring the system back to a stable state, e.g. by means of dropping an existing calldropping an existing call
UMTS Networks 32Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Basic Resource Equations (CDMA)Rbi: data rate of user i hi: channel coefficient of user iRbi: data rate of user i hi: channel coefficient of user iPpilot: Pilot power Fi: Orthogonality factor of user i (multipath)Ith: thermal noise
DownlinkDownlinkQuality (RAKE):
thinterpilotj jii
iibi
t
bi
IIPPhFPhRW
NE
+++⋅⋅⋅⋅
=∑ )(
Resource of user i:
U li k
Power dTransmitte Total:Poo
ii P
P=α
UplinkQuality (RAKE):
thinterij j
ibi
t
bi
IIPPRW
NE
++⋅
=∑ ≠
ˆˆ
Resource of user i: ceInterferen Total:Iˆ
otbb
tb
o
ii NERW
NEIP
+==α
Resource Consumption strongly depends on: data rate, quality (Eb/Nt), receiver structure (RAKE etc., channel estimation, path tracking, …)N li l ti b t d t t d i d E /N
UMTS Networks 33Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Non-linear relation between resource, data rate and required Eb/Nt
Resource Consumption
• Service/BLER-dependent resource consumption9
10resource consumption
• Uplink example:– Service I: Voice
R 12 2kb E /N 5dB6789
B]
Rb = 12.2kbps, Eb/Nt = 5dBαI = 0.99%
– Service II: DataR 144kbps E /N 3 1dB
345
Eb/N
t [d
Voice (12.2 kbps)BLER = 1% Rb = 144kbps, Eb/Nt = 3.1dB
αII = 7.11%
with012
10 100 1000
BLER 1%Data (144 kbps)
BLER = 10%
t10 100 1000
Data Rate Rb [kbps]
0,5% 1% 2% 5%α)(
)(
tbb
tb
NERWNE
+=α
where W is the channel bandwidth
and Rb is the data rate
10% 20% 35% 50%α
UMTS Networks 34Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
UL/DL Load Measures
• UL Measurement
∑ ˆ
16
18
20
[dB
] • Load Estimate
thintercelli i IIPI ++=∑∈0
10
12
14
Pow
er R
ise
thr_CAC = 75%
thr_ConC = 90%
th
thcurrent
IINRNRI
II
0
0
0 11
=
−=−
=η
2
4
6
8
Noi
se R
ise/
P
• DL Measurement
th0
Pi PPP +=∑0
0
2
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
N
• Load Estimate
Pcelli i∑∈0
PP 1System Load
p
Pcurrent
PPPRPRP
PP
0
0
0 11
=
−=−
=η
UMTS Networks 35Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
p
Call Admission Control
• Admitting new call alwaysAdmitting new call always increases the cell loading
• CAC avoids overload by limiting this increase16
18
20
[dB
]
thr CAC
• CAC load check:
?CACnewcurrent thr≤α+η10
12
14
Pow
er R
ise
t
_
• Threshold setting thrCACtrade-off between
2
4
6
8
Noi
se R
ise/
P η_current + α_new
– Maximize capacity: prevent excessive blocking
– Avoid overload: thrCAC < thrConC
0
2
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
N
η_current
System Load
UMTS Networks 36Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Call Admission Control (CAC)
Admitting a new call always increases the cell loadAdmitting a new call always increases the cell loadIn order to avoid overload situations, the admission control will limit this load increaseThe principle is to check the current system load plus the expected resource consumption of the new call against the call admission threshold:
l d ti ≤ th ?load + consumption ≤ thrCAC ?
In case the admission check fails, the basic strategy is to protect ongoing calls by denying the new user access to the system since dropping is assumed to be more annoying than blockingAdmission control is required for uplink and downlinkq pArrivals of high-data-rate users that require a large amount of resources (especially in the downlink) may demand global information
UMTS Networks 37Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Congestion Control
• Even with efficient CAC overload
16
18
20
[dB
]
η current
Even with efficient CAC overload situations still occur due to
– Mobility (esp. downlink)
– Activity
10
12
14
Pow
er R
ise
η_
NR/PR_max
y
• During overload quality of allusers is deteriorated !
• Triggered by measurement
2
4
6
8
Noi
se R
ise/
P
η_reducedthr_ConC
Triggered by measurement
• Action: reduce offered traffic by
ConCcurrent thr≥η
0
2
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
N • Action: reduce offered traffic by downgrading one user
• Threshold setting thrConC to preserve the coverage:
System Loadp g
– NRmax: limitation of MS single transmit power Pimax
– PRmax: limitation of BTS total t it P
UMTS Networks 38Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
transmit power P0max
Congestion Control (ConC)
Due to the mobility (especially of high data rate users) overload situationsDue to the mobility (especially of high data rate users) overload situations occur even if an efficient admission control algorithm is used!The congestion control is activated once the system load exceeds the congestion threshold:congestion threshold:
load ≥ thrConC
In order to overcome the overload situation the load must be lowered until load < thrConC
This is done by reducing the offered trafficLowering the data rate of one or several services that are insensitive to increased delays – this might be the most preferred methody g pPerforming inter-frequency (inter-system) handoverRemoving one or several connections
Global information may be required to minimize the number of alteredGlobal information may be required to minimize the number of altered connections
UMTS Networks 39Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
T adeoff bet een blocking and d opping
Call Admission Control: Simulation Results I
Tradeoff between blocking and droppingExample: 64k per user, urban
45%
50%thr_CAC = 50%thr_CAC = 75%thr_CAC = 90%
16%
18%
20%thr_CAC = 50%thr_CAC = 75%thr_CAC = 90%
30%
35%
40%
abili
ty
12%
14%
16%
abili
ty
20%
25%
ocki
ng P
roba
8%
10%
oppi
ng P
rob
5%
10%
15%Blo
2%
4%
6%Dro
0%
5%
5 15 25 35 45 55
Offered Traffic [Erlang per s ite ]
0%
%
5 15 25 35 45 55
Offered Traffic [Erlang per s ite ]
UMTS Networks 40Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Offered Traffic [Erlang per s ite ] Offered Traffic [Erlang per s ite ]
Cell load depending on CAC threshold
Call Admission Control: Simulation Results II
Cell load depending on CAC thresholdExample: 64k per user, urban
80%
90%
50%
60%
70%
adin
g
20%
30%
40%
Cell
Loa
0%
10%
20% thr_CAC = 50%thr_CAC = 75%thr_CAC = 90%
5 15 25 35 45 55
Offered Traffic [Erlang per site]
UMTS Networks 41Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Packet Data Control: Channel Switching
FlexibilityAsymmetrical data ratesVery low to very high data ratesVery low to very high data ratesControl information/user information
Efficient transmission making good use of CDMA characteristicsDedicated channel (DCH)
Minimise transmission power by closed-loop power controlp y p pIndependence between uplink and downlink capacity
Common channelRandom access in the uplink (RACH)Random access in the uplink (RACH)Dynamic scheduling in the downlink (FACH)
Adaptive channel usage depending on traffic characteristicsInfrequent or short packets ⇒ Common channel (Cell_FACH)Frequent or large packets ⇒ Dedicated channel (Cell_DCH)
UMTS Networks 42Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Channel Switching – Example
CELL_DCH CELL_FACH CELL_DCH
DCH Active Time
Page Download Time Reading Time
DCH Active Time“Chatty Applications”
Example: Web serviceChatty apps : keep alive message stock tickers etcChatty apps.: keep alive message, stock tickers, etc.(e.g. 100 bytes every 15 sec)Second stage: when no activity in CELL_FACH then switch to URA_PCH
UMTS Networks 43Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Packet Data Control
Burst Admission Controlk dDecision on starting packet data transmission
Similar principle like call admission control, i.e. check the system load against a threshold that is usually different from thrCAC
Time horizon: 100msec … 10sec
Rate AdaptationRate AdaptationChoose data rate according to transmit power
UE nearby NodeB ⇒ high data rateUE at cell edges ⇒ low data rate
Decrease data rate in case of overload, cf. congestion control
UMTS Networks 44Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Power Control vs. Rate Adaptation
•• Power Control:Power Control:–– Balances user received quality (BLER, SIR)Balances user received quality (BLER, SIR)–– Users at cell center get less share of BTS Users at cell center get less share of BTS
transmit power assigned than at cell edgetransmit power assigned than at cell edgetransmit power assigned than at cell edgetransmit power assigned than at cell edge–– Occurrence of power overloadOccurrence of power overload
•• Rate Adaptation:Rate Adaptation:
UE 1UE 1
–– Transmit power ~ data rateTransmit power ~ data rate–– Users at cell edge get lower data rate Users at cell edge get lower data rate
assigned than at cell centerassigned than at cell center–– Reduces also power overloadReduces also power overloadReduces also power overloadReduces also power overload
•• In UMTS combination of power control and In UMTS combination of power control and rate adaptation on DCHrate adaptation on DCH
NodeBNodeB
high data ratehigh data rateareaarea
UE 2UE 2low data ratelow data rate
areaarea
areaarea
UMTS Networks 45Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Rate Adaptation Performance
UMTS_urban, 50 kByte UMTS_urban, 50 kByte
30%
35%
40%384k64kadaptive
6
7
8
384k
20%
25%
30%
Prob
abili
ty
4
5
6
elay
[sec
]
384k64kadaptive
10%
15%
Out
age
P
2
3
Mea
n D
e
0%
5%
200 300 400 500 6000
1
200 300 400 500 600
Rate adaptation significantly improves the RRM performance.
Cell Throughput [kBit/sec] Cell Throughput [kBit/sec]
UMTS Networks 46Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
p g y p p
Dynamic Scheduling
• “Statistical multiplexing” of data packets from different data
Sample Flow
packets from different data flows over one shared medium, e.g. on DSCH or HSDPAS h d li ith ti h i f
Flow #1
• Scheduling with time-horizon of 2msec … 1sec
• Optimised usage of radio
UE 1
Fl #2 resources• Exploitation of the short-term
variations on the radio NodeB
Flow #2
channels (opportunistic scheduling)
• Provides certain degree of
Flow #3 UE 2
o des ce a deg ee oQoS
UE 3
UMTS Networks 47Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
UE 3
Conclusions
Basic RRM algorithms presented here:Basic RRM algorithms presented here:Handover ControlPower ControlLoad ControlPacket Data Control
RRM procedures not discussed here:Spreading code managementRRM f TDD d ti l t tRRM for TDD mode: time-slot management
Related issue: RF engineering
Enhanced RRM algorithms in order to:Support advanced packet data transmission techniques such as HSDPASupport advanced packet data transmission techniques such as HSDPA (High-Speed Downlink Packet Access)Support intelligent transmitter/receiver structures like adaptive antenna or MIMO techniques
UMTS Networks 48Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
or MIMO techniques