using s-npp viirs as a transfer radiometer to inter ......using s-npp viirs as a transfer radiometer...
TRANSCRIPT
Using S-NPP VIIRS as a Transfer Radiometer to Inter-compare GOES-R ABI and Himawari-8 AHI
Francis Padula & Changyong Cao NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
1
AMS 2014
Heritage Environmental Satellites
2
5 Band Imager Channels Spatial Res.
1 Visible 1.25 km
4 Infrared 5 km
5 Band Imager Channels Spatial Res.
1 Visible 1 km
4 Infrared 4 km
6 Band Imager Channels Spatial Res.
1 Visible 1 km
2 NIR/SWIR 1 km
3 Infrared 1 km
NOAA: GOES JMA: MTSAT
POES AVHRR LOGO
NOAA: POES
Heritage instruments did not have on-board calibration sources in the Reflective Solar Bands (RSB)
Next Generation of Environmental Satellites
3
16 Band Imager Spectral Region
Spatial Resolution
6 VNIR/SWIR 0.5,1 & 2 km
10 Infrared 2 km
22 Band Imager Spectral Region
Spatial Resolution
6 Visible 0.375/0.75 km
8 NIR/SWIR 0.375/0.75 km
DNB 0.75 km
7 Infrared 0.375/0.75 km
NPP VIIRS LOGO
JMA Himawar
i LOGO
GOES-R LOGO
16 Band Imager Spectral Region
Spatial Resolution
6 VNIR/SWIR 0.5,1 & 2 km
10 Infrared 2 km
POES AVHRR LOGO
JMA: Himawari 8 AHI NOAA: NPP VIIRS NOAA: GOES-R ABI
Significant enhancements in the Reflective Solar Bands (RSB) region, each instrument will have an on-board
calibration source in the RSB
System Field of View IR Data from (www.goes.noaa.gov): November 6, 2013 ~17:30 UTC
4
MTSAT
GOES-E
GOES-W
MTSAT GOES-E GOES-W
Overview of System Coverage IR Data from (www.goes.noaa.gov): November 6, 2013 ~17:30 UTC
5
MTSAT
GOES-E
GOES-W
GOES-E GOES-W MTSAT
6
Bridging the Gap
MTSAT
GOES-E
GOES-W
JPSS
MTSAT
Using Suomi NPP VIIRS as a Transfer Radiometer
7
GOES-E GOES-W
• Suomi NPP VIIRS has demonstrated to be a well calibrated radiometer: » Achieved Calibrated/Validated maturity status » Absolute Radiometric Accuracy Requirements:
RSB: 2% absolute radiometric accuracy TEB: 0.13 K to 1.5 K (dependent upon channel)
• Suomi NPP VIIRS will be used as transfer radiometer to inter-compare GOES-R ABI and Himawari-8 AHI using Land, Ocean, and Cloud scenes
GOES-R: 3-5 %
GOES-R: 1 K GOES-R: 1 K
1. Conduct a spectral comparison of GOES-R ABI and JMA Himawari 8 AHI:
» Identify suitable channels for radiometric comparison between the two instruments (Qualitative and Quantitative)
» Characterize radiometric differences in identified channels
1. Conduct a spectral comparison of Suomi NPP VIIRS, GOES-R ABI and JMA Himawari 8 AHI:
» Identify suitable channels for radiometric comparison between each instrument (Qualitative and Quantitative)
» Identify bands best suited for on-orbit inter-comparisons with VIIRS to be used as a transfer radiometer
1. Provide recommendations for post-launch Cal/Val risk mitigation and readiness using Suomi NPP as a transfer radiometer for the Geostationary missions 8
Objectives
1
2
3
Methodology Typical Earth Target Hyperspectral Observations:
» RSB: Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) – http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/alt_locator/ – Data converted to “Top Of Atmosphere” Reflectance
» TEB: Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) – http://www.class.ngdc.noaa.gov/saa/products/welcome
9 AVIRIS Targets
Identified
System SRFs: » ABI version 2
– https://cs.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOESRCWG/ABISRF
» AHI (released June 2012) – http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/himawari89/sp
ace_segment/spsg_ahi.html » VIIRS (IDPS version)
– https://cs.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/NCC/SpectralResponseVIIRS
9
7 IASI Targets
Identified
Data Processing: • Simulated channel effective spectral radiance (Leff )
was produced for each system: » Using the SRF data for each system and the
corresponding typical earth targets [Eq 1]
• Simulated radiance for each system was analyzed: » RSB: percent difference in TOA Reflectance [%] used
as metric of comparison » TEB: difference in effective temperature [K] used as
metric of comparison 10
Methodology
∫∫
=2
1
2
1
'
'
λ
λ λ
λ
λ λ
λ
λ
dR
dRLLeff
Typical Earth Target Hyperspectral Observations: » RSB: Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer
(AVIRIS) – http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/alt_locator/ – Data converted to “Top Of Atmosphere” Reflectance
» TEB: Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) – http://www.class.ngdc.noaa.gov/saa/products/welcome
System SRFs: » ABI version 2
– https://cs.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOESRCWG/ABISRF
» AHI (released June 2012) – http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/himawari89/sp
ace_segment/spsg_ahi.html » VIIRS (provided by Northrop Grumman)
– https://cs.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/NCC/SpectralResponseVIIRS
peak normalized SRF for a given band
sensor reaching radiance
Typical Earth Targets L
'λR
Eq. 1
11
Reflective Solar Band Hyperspectral Observations
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.3 0.55 0.8 1.05 1.3 1.55 1.8 2.05 2.3
TOA
Ref
lect
ance
[%]
Wavelength [µm]
Open Ocean Coastal Turbid Low-Level Cloud Marine Layer Mid-Level Cloud Cumulus Upper-Level Cirrus Desert Snow Healthy Vegetation Stressed Vegetation
9 AVIRIS Targets
Identified
Cirrus
12
Thermal Emissive Band Hyperspectral Observations
0.00E+00
2.00E+01
4.00E+01
6.00E+01
8.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.20E+02
1.40E+02
1.60E+02
1.80E+02
600 1100 1600 2100 2600
Rad
ianc
e [m
W/m
2 sr
cm
-1]
Wavenumber [cm-1]
MOBY Ocean Site (Clear) MOBY Ocean Site (Cloudy) Desert (Libya) Hurricane Sandy Snow/Ice (Dome C) Arm Site (OK, USA) Pacific Open Ocean (Clear)
7 IASI Targets
Identified
SPECTRAL COMPARISON GOES-R ABI and Himarwari-8 AHI
13
JMA Himawar
i LOGO
GOES-R LOGO
JMA: Himawari 8 AHI NOAA: GOES-R ABI
14 14
ABI: Daytime Cirrus Band
ABI and AHI: Reflective Solar Band Comparison
AHI: Green Band
15
Reflective Solar Band: ABI & AHI Comparison
Percent Difference of TOA Reflectance [%]
-6.000
-5.000
-4.000
-3.000
-2.000
-1.000
0.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
1 2 3 4 5
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
of T
OA
Ref
lect
ance
[%]
Instrument Channel [μm]
Open Ocean Coastal Low-Level Marine Layer Mid-Level Cumulus Upper-Level Cirrius Desert Snow/Ice Healthy Stressed
0.47 0.64 0.865 1.61 2.25
% Diff. = (AHI – ABI)/ABI *100
Comparison Not applicable for: ABI - 1.38 µm and AHI - 0.51 µm
Large differences: Atmospheric & Vegetation
Largest differences: Vegetation
16
Reflective Solar Band: ABI & AHI Comparison
Percent Difference of TOA Reflectance [%]
• Small differences >0.5% for channel’s: 0.47 µm, 0.64 µm &1.61 µm • Largest differences in 0.865 µm and 2.25 µm channels:
» 0.865 µm - impacts vegetation, aerosol over water, winds products » 2.25 µm - impacts daytime land/cloud properties, participle size, snow products
Comparison Not applicable for: ABI - 1.38 µm and AHI - 0.51 µm
% Difference = (AHI – ABI)/ABI *100
17
Close Agreement Found
Reflective Solar Band: ABI & AHI Comparison 0.47 µm
Coastal: 0.34 % Diff.
Marine Layer: 0.02 % Diff.
Reflective Solar Band: ABI & AHI Comparison 0.865 µm
18
Largest Bias: Difference in Shift & Shape + Located on
Spectral Feature
Stressed Veg.: 5.1 % Diff.
Cumulus: 5.4 % Diff.
Reflective Solar Band: ABI & AHI Comparison 2.25 µm
19
Bands Differ in Shift & Shape
Healthy Veg.: 2.6 % Diff.
Desert: 2.1 % Diff.
ABI and AHI: Emissive Band Comparison
20
-1.25
-1.00
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Diff
eren
ce in
Effe
ctiv
e Te
mpe
ratu
re [K
]
Instrument Channel [µm]
Moby Ocean Site (Clear) Pacific Open Ocean (Clear) Moby Ocean Site (Cloudy) Hurricane Sandy Desert (Libya) Snow/Ice (Dome C) Arm Site (OK, USA)
8.5 9.61
Emissive Band Comparison: ABI & AHI Comparison
Effective Temperature Difference [K]
3.9 6.19 6.95 7.34 10.35 11.2 12.3 13.3 21
Eff. Temperature Difference = (AHI – ABI)
Smallest Differences: Hurricane Sandy
Largest Differences: Desert
22
All differences in Eff. Temperature within 1 K • Best Agreement (> ~0.1 K) in channels: 7.34 µm &11.2 µm • Largest differences(> ~0.5 K) in channels: 6.19 µm & 8.5 µm
» 6.19 µm - impacts high-level atmospheric water vapor, winds, rainfall » 8.5 µm - impacts total water for stability, cloud phase, dust, SO2, rainfall
Emissive Band Comparison: ABI & AHI Comparison
Effective Temperature Difference [K]
23
Thermal Emissive Band: ABI & AHI Comparison 11.2 µm
MOBY (Clear): ~0 K Diff.
MOBY (Cloudy): ~0.07 K Diff.
Close Agreement
24
Thermal Emissive Band: ABI & AHI Comparison 8.5 µm
Eff. Temp. ~230 K
Desert: ~0.99 K Diff.
Hurricane: ~0 K Diff.
Eff. Temp. ~307 K
SPECTRAL COMPARISON GOES-R ABI, Himarwari-8 AHI and NPP VIIRS
25
NPP VIIRS LOGO
JMA Himawar
i LOGO
GOES-R LOGO
POES AVHRR LOGO
JMA: Himawari 8 AHI NOAA: NPP VIIRS NOAA: GOES-R ABI
ABI, AHI & VIIRS: Reflective Solar Band Comparison
26
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0.47, M2 0.47,M3 0.64, M5 0.64, I1 0.865, M7 0.865, I2 1.38, M9 1.61, M10 1.61, I3 2.25, M11
Prec
ent D
iffer
ence
TO
A R
efel
ecta
nce
[%]
(AB
I-VIIR
S)/V
IIRS*
100
Instrument Channel [µm]
Open Ocean Coastal Low-Level Marine Layer Mid-Level Cumulus Upper-Level Cirrius Desert Snow/Ice Healthy Stressed
M3 0.47
M2 M5 0.865 1.61
M7 I2 M10 I3 1.38 M9
0.64 I1
ABI VIIRS 27
Reflective Solar Band: ABI & VIIRS Comparison
Percent Difference of TOA Reflectance [%]
2.25 M11
Qualitative Comparison: 0.47 μm & M3 0.64 μm & I1
0.86 μm & M7, I2 1.38 μm & M9
1.61 μm & M10, I3 2.26 μm & M11
% Diff = (ABI – VIIRS)/VIIRS *100
Low-Level & Mid-Level Clouds
Barren
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0.47, M2 0.47,M3 0.5, M3 0.64, M5 0.64, I1 0.865, M7 0.865, I2 1.61, M10 1.61, I3 2.25, M11
Prec
ent D
iffer
ence
TO
A R
efel
ecta
nce
[%]
(AB
I-VIIR
S)/V
IIRS*
100
Instrument Channel [µm]
Open Ocean Coastal Low-Level Marine Layer Mid-Level Cumulus Upper-Level Cirrius Desert Snow/Ice Healthy Stressed
28
Reflective Solar Band: AHI & VIIRS Comparison
Percent Difference of TOA Reflectance [%]
ABI VIIRS M3
0.47 M2 M5
0.865 1.61 M7 I2 M10 I3
0.64 I1
2.25 M11
0.51 M3
Qualitative Comparison: 0.47 μm & M3 0.5 μm & n/a 0.64 μm & I1
0.86 μm & M7, I2 1.61 μm & M10, I3
2.26 μm & M11
% Diff = (AHI – VIIRS)/VIIRS *100
Water Targets & Healthy Veg.
Good Agreement
Good Agreement
ABI, AHI & VIIRS: Emissive Band Comparison
29
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3.9, M12 3.9, M13 3.9, I4 8.5, M14 10.35, M15 11.2, M16 11.2, I5 12.2.I5
Diff
eren
ce in
Effe
ctiv
e Te
mpe
ratu
re [K
]
Instrument Channel
Moby Ocean Site (Clear) Pacific Open Ocean (Clear) Moby Ocean Site (Cloudy) Hurricane Sandy
Desert (Libya) Snow/Ice (Dome C) Arm Site (OK, USA)
Thermal Emissive Band: ABI & VIIRS Comparison
Effective Temperature Difference [K]
ABI M14 8.5 12.3
I5 3.9 M13 30 M12 M15
10.35 M16 I4
Qualitative Comparison: 3.9 μm & M13 8.5 μm & M14 11.2 μm & I5
11.2 I5 VIIRS
Water (Clear)
Hurricane Sandy
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3.9, M12 3.9, M13 3.9, I4 8.5, M14 10.35, M15 11.2, M16 11.2, I5 12.2.I5
Diff
eren
ce in
Effe
ctiv
e Te
mpe
ratu
re [K
]
Instrument Channel
Moby Ocean Site (Clear) Pacific Open Ocean (Clear) Moby Ocean Site (Cloudy) Hurricane Sandy
Desert (Libya) Snow/Ice (Dome C) Arm Site (OK, USA)
Thermal Emissive Band: AHI & VIIRS Comparison
Effective Temperature Difference [K]
Qualitative Comparison: 3.9 μm & M13 8.5 μm & M14 11.2 μm & I5
ABI M14 8.5 12.3
I5 3.9 M13 M12 M15
10.35 M16 I4
11.2 I5 VIIRS 31
Good Agreement
Water (Clear)
Hurricane Sandy
32
Recommendations: Post-Launch Cal/Val Risk Mitigation &
Readiness
Spectral Region Center Wavelength [µm] ABI AHI VIIRS Recommended
Target Reflective Solar 0.47 Ch 1 Ch 1 M3 Clouds Reflective Solar 0.51 Ch 2 M3 Barren & Clouds
Reflective Solar 0.64 Ch 2 Ch 3 I1, M5 All Reflective Solar 0.86 Ch 3 Ch 4 M7, I2 All Reflective Solar 1.38 Ch 4 M9 Clouds (DCC) Reflective Solar 1.61 Ch 5 Ch 5 M10, I3 All Reflective Solar 2.26 Ch 6 Ch 6 M11 All
Thermal Emissive 3.9 Ch 7 Ch 7 I4, M12* Ocean
Thermal Emissive 8.6 Ch 11 Ch 11 M14 Clouds Thermal Emissive 10.35 Ch 13 Ch 13 M15 Ocean, DCC, Snow Thermal Emissive 11.2 Ch 14 Ch 14 I5 Ocean, Clouds
Thermal Emissive 12.3 Ch 15 Ch 15 I5 -
*IASI spectral range did not completely cover M12, and I4 spectral range
Using Suomi NPP VIIRS as a transfer radiometer for the next generation of geostationary operational environmental satellites
• Leverage early Himawari-8 AHI on-orbit data for GOES-R Cal/Val risk mitigation and post-launch readiness » AHI and VIIRS are assets to be utilized during
Post Launch Tests and throughout mission life – Himawari-8 scheduled to launch Fall of
2014 – GOES-R scheduled to launch in Fall
2015/early 2016
• NOAA MOU between NESDIS and JMA: » NOAA will host JMA visiting scientist (see
Steve Goodman, GOES-R Program Scientist)
33
JMA Collaboration
• ABI & AHI Comparison: » RSB: Overall good agreement in most channels (>0.5% Diff.)
– Largest differences in 0.865 µm & 2.25 µm channels » TEB: All differences in Eff. Temperature within 1 K
– Largest differences in 6.19 µm & 8.5 µm channels • S-NPP VIIRS as a Transfer Radiometer:
» All ABI & AHI RSB channels are suitable for inter-comparisons » Only ABI & AHI TEB channels: 7, 11, 13, & 14 are suitable for
inter-comparisons • This effort supports GOES-R post-launch Cal/Val risk mitigation &
readiness, as well as an opportunity to collaborate with the JMA • Establishes a baseline for future comparisons between these systems
34
Summary
Using Suomi NPP VIIRS as a transfer radiometer for the next generation of geostationary operational environmental satellites