using professional judgment vapor intrusion mitigation design

25
Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design Presented by: Thomas Hatton Clean Vapor, LLC President

Upload: kamin

Post on 11-Jan-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design. Presented by: Thomas Hatton Clean Vapor, LLC President. What We Will Be Discussing. Vapor Intrusion Basics Delineating the Plume Mapping Permeability Efficient Design Inherent Inefficiencies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Using Professional JudgmentVapor Intrusion Mitigation

Design

Presented by: Thomas Hatton

Clean Vapor, LLC President

Page 2: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

What We Will Be Discussing• Vapor Intrusion Basics

• Delineating the Plume

• Mapping Permeability

• Efficient Design

• Inherent Inefficiencies

• Overcoming Inherent Inefficiencies

• Monitoring , Management and Reporting

Page 3: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

VI Mitigation Basics

• Create negative pressure below slab• Designed to function under max load conditions• Achieve mandated vacuum requirements• Routine onsite inspections• Run continually

Page 4: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Delineating the PlumeUsing the mobile lab…

Page 5: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Delineating the Plume

Page 6: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Delineating the Plume

Page 7: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Permeability Mapping

Page 8: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Permeability Mapping

Page 9: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5000

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Regenerative

GBR HO 40 (Brushless Radial)

Cincinnati HP-8D19 (Radial)

GBR SOE 16 (Brushless Radial)

AMG Force (Centrifugal)

GBR 89-HA (Brushless Radial)

airflow (cfm)

Vac

uu

m (

''w.c

.)Selecting an Efficient Blower

Page 10: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

…Conditions Change

The problem with current systems…

Page 11: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Inherent Inefficiencies

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Soil ConditionsSeasonal Changes

Onsite InspectionsBuilding Pressures

Page 12: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Power Consumption vs. Outdoor TemperatureTo maintain 0.0048'' wc sub slab vac.

Temperature (F)

Blow

er C

urre

nt (A

mps

)

Inherent Inefficiencies

Page 13: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Overcoming Inefficiencies

• Apply dynamic controls to dynamic conditions• Perform based on predefined parameters– Sub slab vacuum– Air exchange ratios

• Remotely:– Monitor system performance– Make system adjustments

• Immediate alert of system faults

Page 14: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

• Monitor up to 4 blower systems• Mobile fault notifications• Automated reporting• Ideal for:– Individual residences– Multi-family housing – Small buildings

Vapor Guardian 400

Page 15: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

-0.004-0.003

-0.005

Vapor Guardian 5500

• Dynamically control 10 blower systems• Control of sub slab vacuum• Assign functional priority– Sub Slab Pressure– Static Pressure– Airflow

• Monitor up to 55 inputs• Mobile fault notifications• Automated reporting

Page 16: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Excess Vacuum, Excessive Cost

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.0450

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Total System Static Vac.

Power ConsumptionSub Slab Control Reference Point Vac. ('' w.c.)

Syst

em S

tatic

Vac

(''w

.c.)

Pow

er C

onsu

mpti

on (W

atts)

.004 .032

Page 17: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Case Study – Industrial Building

Page 18: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

11 barrels 4 tons

Conserving Resources

Page 19: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Social Responsibility

24,000 lbs. CO2

139 lbs. SO2

Page 20: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

$6,000

Fiscal Responsibility

Page 21: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Care, Custody, and Control

• Long Term Stewardship• Delineating Responsibility• Project Handoff• Continual Monitoring• Liability Ownership• Inspections• State Reports

Page 22: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Remote Monitoring

Page 23: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Automatically generated quarterly

Operations and Maintenance report

from remote monitoring and

management system.

Automated Reports

Page 24: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Conclusions

• Apply professional judgment in design• Current systems are inefficient• Dynamic conditions require dynamic

controls• Dynamic controls and remote monitoring

save:– Resources– Environment– Money– Liability

• Peace of mind• Healthier living

Page 25: Using Professional Judgment Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design

Thank You For Listening

Visit Our Booth For More Info

Tom [email protected]

www.cleanvapor.comwww.vapordynamics.com

The technology described herein may be subject to one or more U.S. Patent Applications.