usaid/honduras school-based violence prevention …
TRANSCRIPT
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 1
USAID/HONDURAS SCHOOL-BASED VIOLENCE PREVENTION ACTIVITY
Quarterly Report
Quarter 4 – October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017
Submission Date: February 22, 2018
Contract Number: AID-522-C-17-00001 Activity Start Date and End Date: February 23,2017 to February 22, 2022
COR Name: Mariella Ruiz-Rodriguez Submitted by: DAI Global LLC
This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International
Development Mission (USAID/Honduras)
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 2
PROJECT OVERVIEW/SUMMARY
Program Name: School-based Violence Prevention Activity/
Asegurando la Educación
Activity Start Date and End Date:
February 23, 2017 – February 22, 2022
Name of Prime Implementing Partner:
DAI Global LLC
[Contract/Agreement] Number: AID-522-C-17-00001
Name of Subcontractors/Subawardees:
Partners of America
Major Counterpart Organizations
Geographic Coverage
(cities and or countries)
Tegucigalpa, San Pedro Sula, La Ceiba, Choloma, Tela
Reporting Period: October 1 – December 31, 2017
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 3
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ASJ Association for a More Just Society
CARSI Central America Regional Security Initiative CDCS Country Development Cooperation Strategy
CED Council for School Development CLA Collaboration, Learning, and Adaptation COMDE municipal education council
CINDE International Center for Education and Human Development CPTED Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
CREOH Comunidades con Riquezas, Educación y Oportunidades en Honduras DINAF Directorate for Children, Adolescents, and Families DO development objective
EMMP Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan EPREVACEH Strategy for Prevention, Protection, Reduction, and Control of Violence in
Schools GIS geographic information systems GOH Government of Honduras
IR intermediate result KM knowledge management M&E monitoring and evaluation
MEL monitoring, evaluation, and learning MIDEH Mejorando el Impacto al Desempeño Estudiantil de Honduras
MOE Ministry of Education NGO non-governmental organization PEC School Education Projects
POA annual operating plans PPP public-private partnerships
SBV school-based violence SBVP school-based violence prevention SBVPA School-based Violence Prevention Activity
SPS secondary prevention services STTA short-term technical assistance
TAMIS Technical and Administrative Management Information System USAID United States Agency for International Development
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 1
INTRODUCTION
USAID/Honduras’s School-based Violence Prevention Activity (SBVPA - known locally as
Asegurando la Educación, or Asegurando) is a five-year activity that launched in February 2017, which is designed to achieve a two-part goal:
1) Address school-based violence (SBV) that impedes the delivery of education and its
goals of access, retention, and learning; and
2) Use education and school processes to contribute to violence prevention in target communities.
Asegurando is implemented by DAI Global LLC (DAI), with support from subcontractor Partners of the Americas. The activity works from a central project office in Tegucigalpa, and
two field offices in San Pedro Sula (covering San Pedro and Choloma) and La Ceiba (covering Ceiba and Tela). Together, these locations are the focus of the USAID/Honduras Country
Development Strategy (CDCS) Development Objective 1 (DO1) to increase citizen security for vulnerable populations, and its Intermediate Result (IR) 1.1.2 through “quality services that protect against violence.” This is part of the US State Department’s Central American Regional
Security Initiative (CARSI) and the 2014 Alliance for Prosperity, a regional initiative aimed at reducing the incentives for migration. In addition, the project aligns with the Government of
Honduras (GOH) 2010 Visión del País on non-violence and security, and Ley Fundamental de Educación, which highlights prevention and rehabilitation as a crosscutting issue in the national curriculum.
The project has the following four objectives:
(i) Improve school ability to reduce school-based violence through creation of safe learning environments;
(ii) Strengthen local networks that increase school safety;
(iii) Increase the capacity of the Ministry of Education (MOE) and social protection actors to prevent and respond to SBV; and
(iv) Lower risk factors and enhance protective factors for students who qualify for secondary prevention services (SPS).
ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS
Progress Overview
This section covers key achievements and status of work plan targets for the October through
December 2017 reporting period. Major highlights are included under each of the four Activity objectives.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 2
Under Objective #1, Asegurando supported the development of integrated school-based violence prevention (SBVP) and reduction strategies, individually tailored using diagnostic
results for each of 14 schools where the project is working during Year I. In addition, the project designed a menu of solutions for common crime challenges in school, through a
comprehensive study of evidence-based practices in SBVP. Using progress made in each individual school, peer-to-peer workshops were held amongst teachers and administrators to share lessons learned across each of the five municipalities of intervention. Finally,
extracurricular activities, such as jornadas de convivencia, were completed in each of the 14 education centers. In preparation for next year, the project completed a comprehensive study
of potentially qualifying schools for intervention, using criteria previously established with USAID to determine which schools are of priority for MOE, and have significant drops in attendance and/or matriculation rates, and increases in violence during the last year.
Objective #2 accomplishments included initial launch meetings with network leaders from the
municipal-level education councils (COMDEs) in each city. The project took steps to strengthen the networks, including relationship building with social network actors that form part of the Mesa Tecnica de Educacion, the Interamerican Development Bank (IDB), police, and
others who will form part of the project’s leverage system. Asegurando la Educacion worked with schools to develop communications strategies to support SBVP at school events and
activities, incorporating lessons learned from other USAID DO1 and Education programs such as Convive!, Proponte Mas, and Mejorando el Impacto del Desempeño Estudiante de Honduras (MIDE). The project collaborated with Unidos por la Justicia to engage police on school
communication strategies under Activity 2.4. Within
Objective #3, the project
helped enhance the capacity of
the MOE to create
institutional guidelines for school based
violence. Specifically,
Asegurando assisted the Ministry’s Directorate of Prevention and Social Rehabilitation in the development of a national strategy for prevention of and response to SBV. This strategy will be finalized and
launched during Q5, and rolled out by the three national violence prevention commissions that the MOE and Sub-Secretary of Prevention (under Ministry of Security) oversee.
As per discussions with USAID, Objective #4 capacity building for Asegurando staff in the Youth Service Eligibility Tool (YSET) by Proponte Mas was put on hold to focus on further definition of
Activity 24. Police Support School Campaign on School Desertion in the Fidelina
Cerros School in San Pedro Sula
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 3
the project’s approach to secondary prevention. The content of Objective #4 will be finalized in collaboration with USAID, and presented to the entire DO1 team early on in Q5.
Country Situation
Throughout the quarter, Asegurando continued to develop the project’s working relationship on SBVP with key Government of Honduras (GOH) agencies such as the MOE and Sub-Secretary
of Prevention, civil society groups, and donors like the IDB. Leveraging these contacts, the project took steps to consolidate the Mesa Técnica in education, consisting of organizations
such as Plan International, World Vision, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), IDB, and other groups that have developed unique approaches to SBVP in Honduras. This Mesa had originally been created a few years back with legal backing as an advisory group to the MOE,
but had not been assembled since. During the coming year, Asegurando will play a leading role in convening the Mesa to ensure best practices in violence prevention are integrated into the
MOE’s wider institutional policies and procedures for preventing and responding to violence. To support Asegurando’s leadership on SBVP, the IDB has agreed to align its methodological approach for funding SBVP in Honduras with the overall technical strategy developed and
introduced by the project. This will help ensure greater sustainability and “one voice” for SBVP across civil society organizations (CSOs), within the GOH, and under the MOE’s direction.
Beyond the Mesa Técnica, the project worked on targeted relationships within the MOE. A USAID field visit to an Asegurando school in the Tegucigalpa neighborhood of Villa Franca by the
Minister of Education, her three Vice Minsters, and the Vice Minister for Security on October 16 helped solidify these relationships. During this visit, senior government officials and USAID
had the opportunity to observe a presentation on the diagnostic results and school prevention strategy led by the school’s Comite de Convivencia, a committee which has been launched in each of the Asegurando intervened schools with legal support from the Ley Fundamental de Educación.
After the visit, Asegurando was invited by the MOE to strengthen the MOE’s national SBVP
strategy (Estrategia de Prevención, Protección, Reducción y Control de Violencia en Centros Educativos de Honduras or EPREVACEH) by working through the three newly created commissions co-led by the MOE and Sub-Secretary of Prevention: (i) Prevention, (ii) Laws, and (iii) Reduction and
Control. Capacity building on this strategy and to the commissions was ongoing throughout the quarter, resulting in an official written request from Minister Rutilla Calderon for technical
assistance to work in-house with MOE staff on finalizing the strategy and defining the roles and responsibilities of the three commissions. The technical assistance will focus in part on responding to comments made on EPREVACEH by the Mesa Rodondo de Cooperantes en
Educacion (MERECE). The strategy will be finalized and disseminated at the start of Year II with support from Asegurando. This is a significant step for both the project and the MOE, as it is
the first comprehensive policy-level document on SBVP in the country.
Implementation Status
While the project made significant progress in new areas during Q4, it is important to note that
the politically polarized violence and uncertainty resulting from the national presidential elections held on November 26 did substantially restrict project mobility. Because the security
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 4
situation often changed daily, the project had some difficulty in scheduling and maintaining regular field activities, meetings, trainings and larger events, due to threats of political violence.
Specifically, travel was limited both within and across cities from November through the end of 2017. In addition, there were concerns that teachers and other government officials were
politically polarized in their views toward the election results, thereby forcing the project to cancel some scheduled meetings with large groups of officials for fear it would become a politically charged event. For this reason, and as per the project’s December 15 th Crisis Plan
(attached in Annex A), several modifications were made to the project calendar during this reporting period.
Notwithstanding, project staff were able to take advantage of this additional time in the office to work in close collaboration with the USAID/Education team on the “co-creation” and
consolidation of its overall technical strategy and methodological approach. This technical approach was laid out in a concept note (attached in Annex B) submitted in December outlining
the CORE approach to SBVP developed by the project. It involves six key areas identified by the team during a November strategy session as the focus areas of school diagnostics and lessons learned from Year I implementation: (i) school management, (ii) norms, (iii) curriculum,
(iv) school safety, (v) relationships, and (vi) case referrals, with an emphasis on gender and inclusion, as well as other SPECIALIZED areas. While the overall project strategy will continue
to be refined in the annual Strategy Review Session to be held in collaboration with USAID at the start of Year 2, this initial foundation has provided a strong technical vision moving forward.
Most of the activities not implemented this quarter due to security concerns were under Objective #1, as they involved engagement with MOE and school representatives, and significant transportation to field sites. They include Activity 1.3 Quick Wins, Activities 1.4 and
1.5 Curriculum Development and Capacity Building, some extracurricular efforts under Activity 1.6, and key infrastructure under Activity 1.7. They also include efforts to formalize
partnerships between schools and network providers through MOUs under Activity 2.3. Finally, as mentioned previously, capacity building on YSET under Objective 4 was postponed until finalization of the project’s secondary prevention model. These have been integrated into
the Year 2 reporting period, under the newly finalized holistic approach. Any resulting modifications to the project calendar are reflected in the implementation progress under each
individual objective below.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE I: IMPROVE SCHOOL ABILITY TO REDUCE SBV
Under Objective 1, program highlights included the following activities and their respective
tasks, as laid out in the Year I Work Plan.
Objective I October November December
Activity 1.2. Conduct participatory school diagnostics and develop integrated SBV prevention strategies.
Task 1.2.2. Using diagnostic results, support each partner school to develop an integrated SBV prevention and reduction strategy.
XX
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 5
Task 1.2.3. Design a portfolio of solutions to common crime challenges.
XX
Activity 1.3 Generate buy-in through quick wins.
Task 1.3.1 Help schools identify immediate win-win opportunities to be funded through grants and local
subcontracts.
XX XX
Activity 1.4 Help schools integrate violence and
gender-based violence (GBV) prevention into existing curriculum
Task 1.4.1 Conduct cascading training-of-trainer (TOT) program for select administrators and teachers.
XX XX
Activity 1.5 Strengthen teachers’ capacity to identify at-risk students
Task 1.5.2 Host peer-to-peer workshops to share knowledge and lessons learned.
XX XX XX
Activity 1.6 Improve extracurricular activities offered
by schools
Task 1.6.1 Work with school administrators, teachers,
mentors, students and community stakeholders to design and implement a variety of extracurricular
activity programs.
XX XX XX
Task 1.6.2 Help existing clubs integrate key SBV lessons into their activities.
XX XX XX
Task 1.6.3 Ensure extracurricular activities include preventing SRGBV and promoting gender equality.
XX XX XX
Task 1.6.4 Use PPPs to improve extracurricular programs.
XX XX
Task 1.6.5 Support partner schools to use the “open schools” model to make public school spaces available
on weekends.
XX XX
Activity 1.7 Provide key infrastructure improvements.
Task 1.7.1 Work with partner schools to define priority infrastructure to support critical safety and security improvements.
XX XX
Task 1.7.2 Support initial quick-win infrastructure improvements.
XX XX XX
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 6
Task 1.7.3 Provide small infrastructure grants through SBVPA and/or help schools secure greater funding for CPTED from donors.
XX XX XX
Activity 1.2 Conduct participatory school diagnostics and develop integrated SBVP strategies. In two separate one-day workshops held by the project in collaboration with
schools across the five cities of implementation, Asegurando supported teachers, students, and parents who are part of the Comites de Convivencia in the development of tailored SBVP strategies. These strategies respond to common violence challenges identified by members of
the school community and
project staff during the diagnostics completed and
reported on in Q3. The strategies focus
on addressing challenges related to GBV, school
discipline, and the need for greater
parent involvement. The strategies work to integrate other network partners into schools’ prevention and response mechanisms, including activating the local police network, CSOs, and support from DINAF. The project also started to work with schools on targeted referrals,
including for issues of sexual harassment, such as those raised in a school (not named for privacy) in Tegucigalpa where female students required treatment for trauma, and teachers
involved needed to be reported to the MOE district office for follow-up with the Fiscalia.
While each school developed their own individual strategy with technical assistance from
Asegurando, based on the results of the diagnostics, certain themes are common across them, and have contributed to the project’s understanding of the key SBV challenges in schools . In
early November, Asegurando held a two-day technical workshop to review the data collected during school diagnostics, as well as initial perceptions of school challenges after working closely with the first 14 schools of intervention. In addition, Violence Prevention Specialist
Lainie Reisman presented the results of a comprehensive desk study on promising practices in SBVP. Using the combination of these diagnostics, initial school efforts, and the desk study,
Students, Teachers, Administrators, and Asegurando Staff in a Tegucigalpa
Workshop to Design SBVP Strategies
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 7
Asegurando identified the following core areas of emphasis (see Exhibit 1) for Year 2 implementation: (i) school management, (ii) norms, (iii) curriculum, (iv) school safety, (v) relationships, and (vi) case referrals, with an emphasis on gender and inclusion, as well as other
SPECIALIZED areas. These became the foundation of discussions on the project’s technical approach in the process of co-creation with USAID.
Activity 1.3 Generate buy-in through quick wins. Due to security concerns, quick win activities have been integrated into the upcoming Q5 efforts, and are part of a wider holistic
approach to grant-making for next year expected to include $800,000 of in-kind and other grants for implementation. The project’s quick wins will focus on equipment for the MOE’s
regional training centers and COMDEs, targeted assistance to strengthen schools, and support to the Ministry’s Prevention and Rehabilitation Unit to produce SBVP training materials. In addition, per the Minister of Education’s request, targeted technical assistance will also be
provided for the development of school education plans (PECs), and to strengthen the Comites de Convivencia in each school. These quick-wins are being expedited under next quarter’s
efforts to ensure compliance and maintain project momentum under its newly consolidated technical strategy.
Activity 1.4 Help schools integrate violence and gender-based violence (GBV) prevention into existing curriculum. As per the section on the project’s implementation status, capacity
building activities were postponed until Q5 next year, due to polarized political violence. This includes the training-of-trainers (TOTs) for a cadre of SBVP teachers and administrators across schools, the MOE, and regional training centers; as well as the project’s ongoing
accompaniment for the MOE in the application of best practices in day-to-day school activities. However, project staff did engage with the MOE remotely on continuing to define profiles for
the cadre of leaders expected to participate in this activity next quarter. This activity will be expedited and rolled out in Q5 under the newly consolidated technical strategy in Year 2.
Exhibit 1: Year 2 Focus Areas
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 8
Activity 1.5 Strengthen teachers’ capacity to identify at-risk students. Similarly, capacity building on student referrals and peer-to-peer workshops were put on hold until early 2018
due to political violence. These efforts will be an integral part of Year 2 implementation once the security situation stabilizes.
Activity 1.6 Improve extracurricular activities offered by schools. Efforts to promote extracurricular clubs were also put on-hold for similar reasons; however, engagement of the
private sector did successfully move forward as planned. Specifically, approximately $20,000 USD in equipment was donated to Asegurando schools by Fundacion Lady Lee to support SBV,
including desks, kitchen equipment and other materials used for learning and work with teachers and students through the Escuela para Padres and student government.
Activity 1.7 Provide key infrastructure improvements. Likewise, Activity 1.7 was detained to security concerns; however, will be highlighted under Q5 efforts, and strongly linked with
the previously mentioned quick wins.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE II: STRENGTHEN LOCAL
NETWORKS THAT INCREASE SCHOOL SAFETY
Under Objective II, the project continued to consolidate relationships supportive of strengthening the school networks as described below.
Objective II October November December
Activity 2.2. Strengthen COMDEs and CEDs to serve as network leaders.
Task 2.2.1. Provide technical assistance to COMDE members and CED directors to hold quarterly systems
exercises.
XX XX XX
Task 2.2.2 Train and assist COMDEs and CEDs to
serve as network weavers by connecting relevant partners and helping launch new ones.
XX XX
Activity 2.3 Support schools to develop partnerships to increase safety and prevent violence.
Task 2.3.1 Support school administrators to negotiate and sign MOUs with key social asset network partners to provide services complementary to schools’
mandate.
XX XX XX
Task 2.3.2 Provide schools with quick-reference guides
(QRGs on how to manage MOUs.
XX XX XX
Task 2.3.5 Coordinate with USAID’s Unidos por la
Justicia activity to help partner schools implement place-based community policing needs and activities.
XX XX XX
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 9
Task 2.3.6 Support partnerships with business, women’s CSOs, Oficinas de la Mujer (OM), and other relevant stakeholders to improve consideration for
girls’ safety.
XX XX XX
Activity 2.4 Create communications strategies.
Task 2.4.1 Help schools communicate the vision statement (as defined in the integrated SBV prevention
strategy) with the broader network and community members.
XX XX XX
Task 2.4.3 Through grants, support schools to create banners, shirts, handouts and hold festivals to increase community participation in SBVP prevention activities.
XX XX XX
Activity 2.5 Host community events.
Task 2.5.1 Collaboration with NGOs, churches,
community outreach centers and school clubs to identify and implement community service projects in
at-risk neighborhoods.
XX XX
Activity 2.2 Strengthen COMDEs and CEDs to serve as network leads. Asegurando worked with the MOE to launch regular monthly meetings of the COMDEs in each of the five cities of
intervention. The COMDEs have been inactive in almost all cities except Choloma up until now; however, through project staff engagement, Asegurando has successfully motivated MOE
leadership to convene regular COMDE meetings. Asegurando’s Network Lead Lorena Reyes completed initial capacity building field visits this quarter, in collaboration with COMDE members and representatives from the MOE central office, wherein she visited the La Paz and
Santa Barbara departments to understand lessons learned in other successful network / COMDE efforts. The models used in these departments will be adapted by the project during
the coming quarter for replication in an urban, high-risk context. The project will organize a workshop in January for COMDE members across all five cities focused on strategic planning to ensure COMDE’s effective oversight of SBVP activities.
Activity 2.3 Support schools to develop strategies to increase partnerships to increase
safety and prevent violence. Relationship building through MOU development with schools was put on hold due to increased violence in schools and surrounding neighborhoods as result of the political polarization that came out of the elections. Notwithstanding, the project did
take the necessary steps to initiate linkages between schools and other social asset network actors prior to the violence. This included a comprehensive effort to connect police with
schools, carried out in collaboration with the Unidos por la Justicia project, drawing on lessons learned from Convive!, and under the supervision of National Police Sub-Commissioner Gernaan Sanchez Veasquez, Director of Interinstitutional Coordination and Support. Interventions
included overall accompaniment of project activities during jornadas de convivencia or other regular patrols and outreach efforts at schools, from each of the corresponding municipal police
units (UMEPs) across all five cities, in order to be responsive to teachers’ and students’
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 10
prevention needs. In addition to police engagement, Asegurando also created systematic connections between CSOs such as ASJ and others to provide targeted secondary service
provision. The project also took steps to more effectively integrate services provided by the Sub-Secretariat of Prevention into schools, through introduction of recreovias as part of SBVP
activities. A map of all available services for schools will be completed next quarter.
Activity 2.4 Create communications strategies. Asegurando worked with schools across the
five cities to host public campaigns at the end of the school year entitled “We’ll be Back!” to encourage students to continue
their studies in the coming school year starting February 2018. A total of approximately
7,000 students attend the events (500 per school), in
addition to participation from the church, police, the mayor’s office, and other network
actors such as the Honduran Institute for the Prevention of
Alcoholism, Drug Addiction, and Dependence (IHADFA).
Activity 2.5 Host community events. Jornadas de convivencia were held in each of the 14 schools where Asegurando intervened this year. These jornadas included the participation of
school administrators, teachers, Escuelas para Padres, and other community actors to improve overall safety through amplified visibility of violence prevention efforts. Across the 14 schools, they involved community festivals and neighborhood clean-ups led by students to increase
overall engagement in SBVP.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE III: INCREASE CAPACITY OF MOE AND SOCIAL PROTECTION ACTORS TO RESPOND TO SBV
Under Objective III, the project worked to enhance the MOE and other social network actors’ capacity in SBVP. Progress in key areas is outlined in detail within the activities listed below.
Objective III October November December
Activity 3.1 MOE has improved capacity to create
guidelines and standards to help schools anticipate, mitigate and respond to violence.
Task 3.1.1 Assist MOE’s general Directorate of
Prevention and Social Rehabilitation and education directors to develop, pilot and roll-out regulations to
help school staff address and mitigate violence within their core functions.
XX XX XX
Campaign on School Dropouts held in Choloma
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 11
Task 3.1.2 Create a guideline for preventing and responding to SBVP.
XX XX
Activity 3.1 MOE has improved
capacity to create guidelines and standards to help schools
anticipate, mitigate, and respond to violence. Asegurando supported the MOE on the drafting of the first
national strategy for school-based violence prevention, EPREVACEH.
This strategy is being developed by the MOE in collaboration with the Sub-Secretariat of Prevention and
other supporting agencies including Fiscalia, targeted CSOs such as Plan
International and ASJ, as well as through targeted technical assistance
from project staff. Moving into next quarter, at the request of MOE, Asegurando will assign a
short-term local consultant to work directly with the MOE’s three SBVP commissions on ensuring the national strategy provides comprehensive but clear guidance on SBVP and
response protocols, as well as next steps in implementing them. As part of this, Asegurando is working with the MOE to address any concerns raised during initial comments provided by the donor community on a previous version of this policy, providing for a unified and holistic vision
for SBVP. The policy will be ready for review and dissemination, and will be put forth as a presidential decree from the MOE’s central office in Q5 next year.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE IV: LOWER RISK FACTORS AND ENHANCE PROTECTIVE FACTORS FOR STUDENTS THROUGH SPS
Under Objective IV, Asegurando worked in collaboration with USAID to further refine its
strategy for secondary violence prevention. As such, capacity building activities in YSET (listed in the table below) under Objective 4 have been put on hold until next quarter.
Objective IV October November December
Activity 4.1 Support schools and education centers to apply screening model to identify high-risk youth.
Task 4.1.1 Provide training to school administrators and teachers on how to use existing screening
processes (such as YSET) to measure each student’s exact level of exposure to risk factors, protection factors and other socio-economic dynamics.
XX
Task 4.1.2 Support administrators, teachers and other community leaders in the network to match students
XX XX
COP with MOE SBVP Commissions during review of
EPREVACEH
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 12
with appropriate services based on the needs identified in each screening tool.
Activity 4.2 Identify and improve secondary prevention service packages.
Task 4.2.1 Help schools and network partners
understand the various existing secondary prevention services available and which students (based on
screening results) are most relevant for each service.
XX
Task 4.2.2 Assist schools and network partners to
create a menu of options describing each type and level of service so that teachers, school administrators and community leaders can make appropriate student
referrals.
XX
IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES
As discussed in previous sections, the project faced significant implementation challenges this quarter due to violence that broke out in the aftermath of the presidential elections. This
limited project staff and beneficiaries’ ability to mobilize on the streets for meetings or significant events, as well as resulted in significant polarization amongst students, teachers and communities. As a result, many activities were cancelled or postponed; however, they have
been folded into next year’s newly consolidated technical approach to SBVP.
MEL PLAN UPDATE
The project completed an additional round of edits on the MEL Plan, addressing feedback and comments raised by USAID on the previous draft. In addition, draft survey instruments for collecting data for Indicators 1 and 1.1 were developed for USAID review in preparation for
the baseline study implementation process. The draft MEL Plan has been disseminated by the MEL team to Asegurando staff in the three field offices in preparation for launch of baseline
study efforts, linking the technical approach with clear indicators, and establishing overall targets for Year 2 implementation.
This section to be completed in greater detail in future versions of quarterly reports upon
USAID approval of the project MEL Plan.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 13
COLLABORATING, LEARNING, AND ADAPTATION
(CLA)
In addition to the MEL Plan, a draft Learning Plan was developed by the project and submitted to USAID for review and feedback. As mentioned above, future quarterly reports will contain
greater detail on CLA upon USAID approval of the MEL Plan.
INTEGRATION OF CROSSCUTTING ISSUES AND
USAID FORWARD PRIORITIES
Gender and Social Inclusion
USAID provided feedback on the gender analysis submitted as part of initial project deliverables in June 2017. Based on suggestions provided, Gender and Social Inclusion Specialist Mary Ellen
Duke was hired to support the revision of the project’s analysis, laying the foundation for development of a comprehensive gender strategy. Recommendations coming out of the
analysis look at targeted ways in which gender and inclusion can be integrated as a crosscutting issue across the project’s overall approach, with a focus on ensuring these topics are part of pre- and in-service teacher development programs, referral services, and school protocols and
norms for prevention and response. To respond to the holistic vision for gender and inclusion, Asegurando will assign a staff person to oversee project activities in this area next quarter.
Sustainability Mechanism
Significant steps have been taken to ensure sustainability of Asegurando’s results early on in the program. Specifically, the project works to introduce SBV interventions that are transferrable
to the MOE, Sub-Secretariat of Prevention, and other local GOH agencies and CSOs by being (i) relatively simple to implement, (ii) low budget, and (iii) resource-effective. Activities are designed as part of a larger holistic vision for SBVP that comes from the central level within
MOE, and is functionally implementable by schools and their supporting network actors, with limited technical assistance from the project. As needed, these approaches are being adapted
based on lessons learned from implementation in the field, such as in the case of school diagnostics, which the project is modifying to become a “rapid assessment” for application by schools across MOE during the first part of Year 2. In addition, the project is supporting the
development of a national level policy making structure through the creation of EPREVACEH, which will help ensure effective institutional support for school-level implementation.
Environmental Compliance
Activities under environmental compliance to be included in future quarterly reports upon launch of grants component.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 14
Policy and Governance Support / Local Capacity Development
Beyond activity progress reported above under Objectives 1 – 3, no additional information to
report at this time.
Public Private Partnership (PPP) Reports
Asegurando has launched initial relationship with several private sector actors that have come forward to provide targeted support to individual schools. For instance, approximately $20,000 USD of targeted assistance was provided by the Lady Lee Foundation through in-kind grants to the Desarrollo Juvenil school in the form of stoves, refrigerators, microwaves and desks. In addition to these targeted materials, Asegurando la Educacion intervention schools participated in the Fundacion Tigo’s anti-bullying campaign by entering a contest to create activities that prevent bullying. Once Asegurando la Educacion’s strategic vision is consolidated in the annual Strategic Review with USAID, we will launch an event for representatives from key private sector organizations to present the overall SBVPA approach. As part of this, we will create a plan for integrating private sector efforts across the project, through assistance in targeted areas that support our overall objective.
STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION AND
INVOLVEMENT
See activity information reported under objectives sections above.
MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES
This quarter DAI completed the hiring and onboarding of a new Finance and Operations Director, including training in DAI systems, processes, policies, and procedures. The Director
will be charged with reviewing and optimizing all project financial and operational practices to ensure compliance and effective financial stewardship.
In November, Home Office Project Manager Ailea Sneller traveled to the project office Tegucigalpa to work with the team to review management practices, needs, and areas for
improvement, and helped project leadership identify ways to better define team roles and responsibilities, streamline processes, and address operational constraints to prepare for
increased project activity volume going into Year 2. Specific resulting recommendations included refinements to the project staffing structure to better support the grants and operations teams; more clearly defining a common and unified project vision for all staff; and
decentralization of certain financial processes to project regional offices to improve operations. The home office provided follow-up support to the project operations teams to realize these
improvements and continue defining ways to improve project administration. The redefinition of the project’s technical strategy also provided a platform to communicate and solidify the project vision for staff and stakeholders. The team will continue to present and reinforce this
vision as part of the new project strategy.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 15
The Finance team continued to work closely with USAID to process the project’s ISV exoneration through relevant GOH channels, which will result in more efficient and cost-
effective project operations once the exoneration is in place and resources tied up in ISV payments can be re-programmed.
In project human resources, the team began to review staffing needs and team structure
changes to support the new project strategy and increased volume of activities going into project Year 2. The team worked on initial cost impact analyses and worked to prioritize new
positions as needed and make a plan to appropriately staff all project objectives. The project also began a salary equity analysis, now that the team is nearly fully staffed, to ensure appropriate and equitable salaries across the team, and will develop and review any necessary
adjustments as a result.
LESSONS LEARNED
Crucial to Year I success has been the project’s ability to successfully position itself among key actors
within the government and CSOs. In particular, the project’s
growing relationship with the MOE senior officials has helped to strengthen overall efforts and
ensure “one vision” for SBVP, both within the Ministry, as well
as across other supporting agencies that engage on prevention. As part of this, the
visit to project field sites by the Minister of Education and the
Sub-Secretariat of Prevention provided unique insight into strengthening SBVP. Specifically, one of the lessons learned is the importance of employing
methodologies that can demonstrate success, replication, and potential for scale-up by the broader MOE staff. This will be especially important with regard to the modification of school diagnostics, or “rapid assessments” moving forward next year. Asegurando is working closely
with the MOE on the design of those assessments to ensure they are adapted to the needs of the school system and its wider network of supporting actors.
PLANNED ACTIVITIES FOR NEXT QUARTER
INCLUDING UPCOMING EVENTS
Planned activities for next quarter will include a number of internal planning sessions, such as
the annual Strategic Review, as well as finalization discussions on the MEL Plan and instruments,
Mrs. Rutilia Calderón - Head of the Ministry of Education, Alejandra Hernández – Vice-
Minister of Security, USAID and school representatives, and Asegurando la Educación staff
during the visit to the Desarrollo Juvenil School. (Oct. 2017)
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 16
the Gender Analysis and Strategy, and the overall approach to grants. In addition, the project expects to participate in several senior-level GOH meetings with the new Minister of Education
and Vice Ministers, as well as the Sub-Secretariat of Prevention, to promote its newly consolidated technical strategy within the new political administration. In addition, we foresee
a potential launch event for the EPREVACEH and MOE’s overall SBVP activities moving into the upcoming school year in February. Asegurando COP will work in close collaboration with the COR to ensure the events are aligned with USAID Mission protocol and upcoming calendar of
activities.
HOW IMPLEMENTING PARTNER HAS ADDRESSED
A/COR COMMENTS FROM THE LAST
QUARTERLY OR SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
Asegurando la Educacion has taken several steps to address COR comments on the last quarterly report. As part of this, the project has developed the current structure for development and submission of quarterly materials, laid out as per the key areas required within the Asegurando
contract. Each objective and its core tasks and objectives are clearly laid out and addressed in each section of the report. In addition, concerns about clarity of technical vision has been
clarified through refinement of the overall project strategy. The project’s consolidated approach is reflected in this and forthcoming quarterly report .
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 17
ANNEX A: CRISIS PLAN
As per USAID’s request in response to the current security crisis post-national elections in Honduras, Asegurando la Educacion has developed the following modifications to our operational calendar during the months of December and January. The table below states
per objective the activities originally planned for these months, how they’ve been impacted and changes that have been proposed responding to the project and beneficiary needs, while still maintaining adherence to security standards set by DAI’s policy. In addition
to the security situation, it takes into account the realignment of the project activities under a consolidated strategic vision. Please note this is a live document in the sense that, as the security situation changes, modifications will continue to be made as needed.
Activity Place of
Implementation
Status Impact Proposed Change Responsible
OBJECTIVE #1: TO IMPROVE SCHOOLS’ ABILITY TO REDUCE VIOLENCE THROUGH SAFE LEARNING SPACES
1.3.1. Help schools
identify immediate quick-win opportunities to be
funded through grants and local subcontracts
3 Regions Program
description designed, grants developed with 14
implementation schools
On-hold Transition from focus
on quick-wins to integrate grants across Year II Work Plan
efforts
Technical Director,
supported by Director of Finance and Ops
1.4.1 Conduct
cascading TOT for select administrators and teachers
3 Regions Draft initial
concept for training materials defined
On-hold.
Teachers were only available in Dec, not again
until Feb
Integration into
proposed SBV Advisor’s SOW and portfolio of activities to rollout in
February
SBV Advisor
1.4.2 Support administrators to train
other school staff
3 Regions Dependent on advances in Activity
1.4.1
On-hold Integration into Year II Work Plan activities as
part of teacher-to-
SBV Advisor
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 18
teacher exchanges
across schools
1.5.1 Conduct basic orientation in and develop directories
for teachers and administrators to
identify and refer at-risk students
3 Regions Development of directories incorporated into
social network actors mapping.
Proposed subcontractor identified
No impact No change. Subcontract to be signed next week.
Completion of activity in Jan and Feb with
regular reviews of subcontractor efforts by Asegurando / USAID to
assure co-creation
Network Lead
1.6.1 - 5 Improve extracurricular
activities offered by schools
3 Regions Initial efforts rolled out as part of the
jornadas de convivencia; however, follow-up
not able to be completed
Delayed This activity will be integrated in our Year II
Work Plan
Technical Director
1.7.3 Provide small
infrastructure grants through SBVPA and/or help schools
secure greater funding from CPTED from donors
3 Regions As per Oct / Nov
discussion with USAID, awaiting final designation of
FHIS field sites to perform walkabouts.
Training to be integrated in
SBVPA capacity building plan
No impact No change Technical Officer
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 19
OBJECTIVE #2: TO STRENGTHEN THE LOCAL NETWORKS THAT INCREASE SCHOOL
SAFETY
2.2.2 Train and assist COMDEs and CEDs to serve as network
facilitators
SPS / Ceiba Initial meetings held with all COMDE leaders
No impact No change Network Lead
2.3.3 Jornadas de Convivencia
3 Regions All jornadas completed in the
weeks before security situation, minus 2 in Teguc
and Ceiba which were held the first
day of the protests.
No impact No change Regional Directors / School
Coordinators
OBJECTIVE #3: TO INCREASE THE CAPACITY OF MOE AND SOCIAL PROTECTION ACTORS ON SBV
3.1.2 Create Guide to Preventing and
Responding to SBVP.
Tegucigalpa 1-day workshop for launch and
review of SBV Prevention
Strategy postponed
On-hold SEDUC agreed to hold in Feb once political
change takes place
Technical Director / Network Lead
3.5.5 Work with the Ministry of Security to integrate SBV into
overall vision
Tegucigalpa Monthly meetings continued until Nov
Ongoing conversations, no impact
No change. Conversations continued over phone /
email.
Technical Director / Regional Director Teguc
OBJECTIVE #4: TO LOWER RISK FACTORS AND ENHANCE PROTECTIVE FACTORS FOR STUDENTS
Activity 4.1.1 Provide
training to school
3 Regions Planning for this
modified under
Not impacted No change (due to
security).
COP / SBV Advisor
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 20
administrators and
teachers on how to use existing screening processes such as
YSET
new consolidates
technical identity
Activity 4.1.2 Support administrators,
teachers and other leaders to match students with
appropriate services
3 Regions Same Same Same COP / SBV Advisor
Activity 4.2 Assist schools and network
partners to create a menu of options describing each type
of service
3 Regions Same Same Same COP / SBV Advisor
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 21
ANNEX B: CONCEPT NOTE
USAID/HONDURAS ASEGURANDO LA EDUCACIÓN Project Strategy Concept Note December 2017
Contents
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... 22
STRATEGIC OVERVIEW ............................................................................... 22
APPROACH...................................................................................................... 25
Approach Parameters...........................................................................................................................26
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES ............................................................... 26
Differentiated interventions (CORE and SPECIALIZED) ......................................................26
Intervention Phases ...............................................................................................................................27
Cross-cutting implementation...........................................................................................................28
Direct and indirect interventions ....................................................................................................29
Cohort phasing........................................................................................................................................29
Strategic school selection process ..................................................................................................30
Coordination............................................................................................................................................31
Sustainability .............................................................................................................................................33
NEXT STEPS..................................................................................................... 34
ANNEX A: ASEGURANDO LA EDUCACIÓN LOGICAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................... 36
ANNEX B: GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT-SENSITIVE EDUCATION........................................................................................... 46
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 22
INTRODUCTION
This concept note outlines Asegurando La Educación’s vision, strategic overview, approach, and implementation strategies. These set the groundwork for the project to achieve its four main objectives, considering USAID’s feedback and lessons learned during the first nine months of project implementation. The objective of the concept note is to generate consensus between USAID and DAI regarding shifts in the direction of the project, critical next steps, and a related timeframe. The Strategic Overview section sets out the project’s guiding principles within the Honduran context. The Approach section lays out the project vision for strengthening education systems in Honduras, related roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders, and key system leverage points. The Implementation Strategies section outlines the strategies that the team will use to achieve project objectives. The section on Next Steps lays out a process for the operationalization of the vision and strategy defined in concept note, including major milestones and dates for the next 12 months. These four sections taken together aim to provide a roadmap for the project moving forward. Once validated by USAID, the concept note will serve as the blueprint for a more detailed project planning process that will focus on specific methodologies and models of intervention. The output of this planning process will be an integrated Year 2 Work Plan, delivered to USAID within 21 working days of approval of the concept note by USAID. To guarantee a clear roadmap between the vision and results, we are also providing a revised logical framework in Annex A that will connect the overall vision of the project with specific goals, the four main project objectives, key activities, indicators, and key assumptions.
STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Honduras has been facing a security crisis over the past decade that has affected all realms of society, including historically safe spaces such as educational and religious institutions. To respond, USAID/Honduras has designed and is implementing a wide range of programs as part of its 2015-2019 Country Development Cooperation Strategy (CDCS) Development Objective One (DO1): Citizen Security Increased for Vulnerable Populations in Urban, High-Crime Areas. In addition to its long-standing community-based violence prevention programming, USAID/Honduras is pioneering new approaches through the School-Based Violence Prevention Activity (SBVPA), locally named Asegurando La Educación (“Asegurando”). The education system in Honduras lags behind others in the region as shown by several key education-related indicators, such as attainment and performance on learning assessments. The high levels of school-based violence (SBV) have severely affected education, as schools and other actors in the system lack the capacity and resources to tackle challenges such as school safety, gender-based violence (GBV), substance abuse, gang activity, bullying, or other challenging classroom dynamics. Thus, while contributing to the achievement of DO1 objectives, Asegurando responds to the equally important USAID Education Strategy Goal 3: Increased Equitable Access to Education in Crisis and Conflict Environments. Integrating both DO1 and Education Strategy Goal three, the project goal is:
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 23
Citizen security increased for vulnerable populations while expanding equitable access to education for children and youth in urban, high-crime areas.
By providing key contributions to goal, successes in Honduras − a country facing one of the most severe violence crises in the region − can be applied to a variety of USAID contexts worldwide. Asegurando is first and foremost an education system1 strengthening project, incorporating relevant school and community resilience methodologies to reduce violence by addressing risk factors and enhancing protective factors. By strengthening Honduras’ education system, Asegurando will increase the system’s resilience to violence in order to improve education access, retention, and learning. Borrowing from USAID’s definition, resilience enables the ability of schools to mitigate, adapt to, and recover from the shocks and stresses created by violence in the environment in a manner that reduces chronic vulnerability and promotes development. Asegurando puts the school system at the core of its interventions. Using a bottom-up approach, the project will support evidence-based interventions at the school level, guided by technical models, to achieve improved school safety (Project Objective 1).2 The school system-level interventions will be rigorously documented and widely shared, and ultimately strengthen the capacity of key stakeholders (including the Honduran Secretária de Eduacion - SEDUC) to prevent, respond, report, and monitor SBV. Given the critical role of SEDUC in institutionalizing reforms and contributing to sustainability over time, parallel to the school-level work is a more traditional top-down approach to support SEDUC at all levels.3 This will deepen SEDUC’s leadership in providing the necessary support to schools and other social protection and social network actors to achieve the project’s expected outcomes and to ensure institutionalization and sustainability over time (Objective 3). Asegurando will also help schools to identify and respond to students struggling with the highest risk factors and/or displaying initial violent behaviors (Project Objective 4). Underpinning all three objectives is the critical role of school systems and networks (Project Objective 2). Asegurando will facilitate collaboration between local, regional, and national level actors to strengthen school safely (See Box). Network members include social actors such as schools, government entities (SEDUC and others), and non-government entities (e.g., service providers, NGOs, CSOs, FBOs, academia, businesses, etc.). Asegurando will strengthen collaboration between members to address SBV and support them to
1 Asegurando defines the education system as the complex and changing set of actors that intersect, interact and influence each
other, continuously reshaping how schools work at the individual, family, community, and societal levels . These actors include but are not limited to schools (learners, teachers, administrators, parents), relevant GOH actors (e.g., SEDUC), community
actors (e.g., community leaders and service providers), and other donor agencies. 2 Asegurando recognizes the school system as a collection of relevant stakeholders within the schools (students, teachers,
administrators, parents) and those outside of the school structure that influence education processes and/or serve the school community. 3 The term “SEDUC at all levels” encompasses the Sub-Secretariat for Prevention and Rehabilitation at the central level; the
Prevention, Reduction, and Norms Inter-Agency Commissions; supporting areas including Student Services and Curriculum;
decentralized departmental, municipal, and district offices of SEDUC; and related in-service teacher training centers.
Key network members already
identified include DINAF, the Instituto Hondureño para la Prevención
del Alcoholismo, and NGOS providing targeted SBV services, including ASJ
on sexual abuse and trauma, Plan International on school norms,
CEPREV on gender-based violence, and COIPRODEN on youth
protection.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 24
implement the models developed by the project. Whether by implementing interventions, providing care and treatment services, documenting evidence, or generating policy proposals and methodologies, the role of networks will be critical to ensure success and sustainability of Asegurando’s work over time. Asegurando will implement all activities with a conflict-sensitive lens, adhering to key principles of the Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE)4; namely to Do No Harm, Prioritize Prevention, and Promote Equity and Holistic Development. We provide more details on these key INEE principles in Annex B. In addition to the INEE principles, Asegurando will also follow a set of project principles that will guide all activities:
● School systems as the center of interventions. We will focus on building the capacity of schools and educational systems to prevent, respond, report and monitor SBV, and regenerate safe learning spaces within schools.
● Incentivize participation and facilitate collaboration. We will engage a wide spectrum of community members to participate in education processes and to identify and mobilize community resources to prevent SBV. We will facilitate the collaboration and coordination required between diverse government and non-government entities, with leadership provided by SEDUC, to support school-based interventions as well as treatment, victim support, and referral systems by strengthening and facilitating collaboration of key social network actors.
● Document, develop evidence, and adapt. We will develop and apply evidence-based interventions, document successes and areas for improvement, and collaborate and adapt to improved educational policies based on experiences at the school-level. This principle recognizes the importance of USAID’s first flagship school-based violence initiative and its potential impacts in Honduras and beyond.
Based on the strategic considerations, approach, and principles above, Asegurando’s strategy is summarized as follows:
Project Vision. By executing this strategy, Asegurando will leave behind a strong legacy in Honduras. By the end of the five-year project period, it will have contributed to an evidence-based, institutionalized SBV prevention system; co-created, implemented, adapted, and documented specific SBV prevention models; and supported local actors to filter and apply these models throughout the Honduran education system. By strengthening government and non-government actors (CSOs, FBOs, businesses, etc.) within the education system, Asegurando will have laid the groundwork for models to be institutionalized and sustainable over time. By bringing together a consolidated network of social assets in the target communities and municipalities, Asegurando will have structured referral mechanisms for schools to refer cases that require specific direct attention. Asegurando will have introduced unique and innovative approaches to SBV prevention. It will have created social support networks that integrate community leaders, leading to shifts in
4http://toolkit.ineesite.org/toolkit/INEEcms/uploads/1150/INEE_Guiding_principles_A3_English[1].pdf
Strategy Statement Asegurando la Educación will improve the resilience of educational systems in Honduras by strengthening the capacity of system actors to prevent, respond,
report, and monitor SBV, in order to improve access, retention, and learning.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 25
values regarding the importance of and need for a quality education system. Taken together, these achievements will improve the resilience of the educational system and contribute to a reduction in violence in targeted communities.
APPROACH
Figure 1 summarizes Asegurando’s strategic approach and will be explained in more detail throughout the concept note. At the core of the approach is the school community, consisting of students, teachers, administrators, and parents. Envisioned as a three-legged stool, the school community will be supported by: (1) SEDUC at all levels; (2) Government and non-government social asset networks, including national, regional, and local stakeholders; and (3) Secondary prevention service providers. Further details on the approach parameters are provided below. Figure 1: Asegurando Strategic Approach
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 26
Approach Parameters
1. Systemic: With an overall goal of increasing the resilience of the education system, Asegurando will identify and influence leverage points to affect systemic change through interventions carried out in its four objective areas.
2. Multi-level: Asegurando will work both from the bottom up and the top down, and tailor interventions according to roles, responsibilities, and opportunities of key stakeholders at the national, municipal, and community levels. Borrowing from the public health model, the project will work at the individual, relationship, community, and societal level.
3. Multi-sectoral: Asegurando will build the capacity of education-sector actors and collaborate with other sectors (e.g., security, social protection) to ensure the provision of services to address specific needs of students.
4. Population-specific: Interventions will fit the needs of the populations that they are meant to serve. For example, interventions with students will be youth-friendly and focus on prosocial activities and actions within the school environment.
5. Tailored: Given the diversity of Asegurando communities and schools, we will offer tailor-made solutions to specific issues (specialized services). This is particularly the case for secondary and tertiary prevention services, incorporating treatment, care, and prevention of reincidence.
6. Locally oriented: By building the capacity of local structures to prevent, respond, report, and monitor SBV, the program will be nested within sustainable and strengthened local structures.
7. Evidence-based: Applying technical standards based on national and international promising practices, the program will emphasize interventions that have promise or demonstrated results. It will gather and use data to drive adaptation, ensuring maximum project impact.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
Having laid out Asegurando’s strategic overview and approach, this section of the concept note describes our implementation strategies, i.e., how we will execute the strategy and approach to achieve results. We will further develop these strategies and provide more details on methodologies in the Year 2 Work Plan.
Differentiated interventions (CORE and SPECIALIZED)
Asegurando conducted 14 school diagnostics earlier this year, with data provided by field teams with an ongoing presence in the first cohort of schools. The results allowed us to prioritize interventions based on common findings. As a result of this process, Asegurando has defined a package of semi-standardized interventions, referred to as the CORE intervention package, that will be delivered to all Asegurando schools. The CORE package focuses largely on enhancing the school environment and will include elements targeting:
1. School management; 2. Norms; 3. Curriculum; 4. School Safety; 5. Relationships and interactions (individual, family, school, community); and 6. Referral and treatment systems.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 27
The CORE package will help to strengthen schools (Project Objective1) by building on methodologies developed by SEDUC and other local and regional actors, but which have not yet been implemented or rigorously evaluated. The project will support SEDUC to take the necessary actions to enshrine the interventions in holistic policy reforms to ensure sustainability and systemic change (Project Objective 3). The role of strengthened social asset networks (Project Objective 2) is key to the development, implementation, and monitoring of the CORE package. The project will therefore facilitate the participation of diverse community actors and local resource mobilization to support implementation of the CORE package.
Asegurando will also develop SPECIALIZED interventions to address certain key issues identified in the diagnostics and prioritized by the schools themselves. These may include gender-based violence, substance abuse, trauma, mental health or other issues affecting schools (e.g., bullying, discrimination, self-inflicted violence, partner violence, or sexual abuse). Contributing to Project Objectives 1, 2, and 4, the SPECIALIZED interventions will be delivered on a rolling basis based on prioritized demand from schools. In terms of the levels of prevention, CORE interventions will comprise mostly primary prevention applied to whole-of-school issues and populations (teachers, students, and/or parents), but they will also incorporate elements of secondary prevention. For example, they may focus on improving relationships or creating and promoting referral and treatment systems. SPECIALIZED interventions will be largely secondary in nature, with elements of primary and tertiary prevention as well. SPECIALIZED interventions will be delivered to specific populations based on relevance and demand.5 In sum, Asegurando will be working with both universal interventions (primary) as well as targeted interventions for high-risk school individuals (secondary and tertiary), forming a comprehensive, whole-school approach, which demonstrates the highest degree of evidence worldwide in achieving results and impact. (For more information, please see Asegurando’s Promising Practices and Menu of Solutions document).
Intervention Phases
One implementation strategy that the project will use to achieve results is the logical phasing of interventions. As the project enters Year 2, it will move from an initial diagnostic and design (Phase 1) into implementation and application. In its first year, Asegurando has identified relevant models that could be adapted to the Honduran context (or that have been piloted in the Honduran context), and has mobilized technical expertise that can support the adaptation process. Having completed the diagnostics, developed a Promising Practices paper, undertaken school-based strategy sessions, and engaged technical experts, Asegurando has laid the groundwork for Phase 2 of the process: the rapid design of the initial CORE intervention package and rollout to schools by February 2018. Phase 3, to be completed by August 2018, will focus on the development of additional CORE interventions as well as the SPECIALIZED interventions. Phase 4, from 2018 to the end of intervention delivery in 2021, will be delivery of interventions, evaluation, ongoing adaptation, and transfer to the Honduran education system. (See Figure 2).
5 It is critical to note that the lines between primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention are often blurred,
particularly in highly volatile and violent community settings.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 28
Figure 2: Intervention Phases
Cross-cutting implementation
Underpinning the packages of interventions and specific project objectives are several cross-cutting elements that will be embedded into project implementation:
● Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL)/ Collaboration, Learning, and Adapting (CLA). Building on the work done in Year 1, Asegurando will continue to develop a robust MEL agenda linked to its knowledge management cycle and informed by its CLA approach. Our MEL strategy goes beyond collecting data to report on indicators, promoting products, and sharing results; in addition, Asegurando will develop local capacity to produce and share knowledge management deliverables (e.g., case studies, observation studies, surveys, etc.), to continuously improve its program interventions, and contribute to the SBV prevention field’s body of knowledge.
● Behavior Change Communication (BCC). Asegurando also will develop a robust communication strategy that incorporates core elements of BCC. Asegurando will support SEDUC and other social protection actors to use communication strategies to promote positive behavior targeted at the school community and actors that support it. Asegurando will also develop and nurture learning communities of key actors (particularly at the school level) to ensure peer-to-peer support, exchange of best practices, and increased accountability.
● Gender and Social Inclusion. The project will prioritize broad-based inclusion of students, parents, and community members. In addition, many of the CORE and SPECIALIZED interventions will address issues such as school-based gender-based violence, positive masculinity, gender relationships, and discrimination.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 29
Direct and indirect interventions
The original design of Asegurando was based on a “deep dive” pilot approach in a limited number of schools. As such, the project carried out an intensive diagnostic and relationship-building process in Year 1 with 14 selected schools. Adapting to changing USAID Mission priorities, Asegurando will significantly increase the number of DO1 schools served. Using the targeted USG place-based strategy (PBS) in Honduras as a foundational starting point, the project will gradually shift over time from direct implementation (by the project team and implementing partners) to indirect implementation (working with strengthened educational actors) based on system engagement, ultimately working with a significantly larger subset of the PBS intervention schools. Asegurando will complete the social network asset mapping exercise to identify and enable leverage points in the system to support the shift from direct to indirect implementation. Within SEDUC in particular, we will focus on enhancing the support for a national mandate for SBV, provided by the three sub-secretariats of education (Asuntos Tecnicos Pedagogicos, Modalidades Educativas, Asuntos Administrativos y Financieros). We will engage the Prevention Commissions that oversee the implementation of the National Strategy for Prevention (EPREVACEH), and other areas such as the Sistema Nacional de Informacion Educativa in knowledge management and communication. Furthermore, we will look to the Direccion General de Servicicios Educativos (DGDP) to roll out efforts to build the capacity of teachers and administrators in standardized curricular and extracurricular SBVP. At the departmental level, this will be supported by Technology and Educational Modality and other units, as well as the Regional Training Centers strategically located for in-service courses in San Pedro Sula, Tela and Tegucigalpa. Within the districts, the project will work with COMDEs and CEDs to ensure best practices are applied across the education system and its wider social asset networks to support access to learning in classrooms. In sum, the project will provide a package of capacity building services that support school administration, teachers, and the overall institution at a central and regional level. In particular, in-service training will allow the project to have a targeted impact in the way teachers integrate school-based violence prevention (SBVP) into classroom approaches. In addition, support to the three interagency commissions (Prevention, Reduction, and Norms) will help strengthen the overall Secretariat’s vision for prevention through the National Strategy for Prevention, Reduction and Control that the SEDUC is currently developing.
Cohort phasing
Asegurando will broaden its reach by expanding the size of its school cohorts over time in line with a shift from direct to indirect implementation. As education system actors take on additional roles in SBVP initiatives, Asegurando will expand its reach to a broader number of schools by working with and through these actors. This will sustainably institutionalize interventions while also scaling the operation of the project. Asegurando has engaged with education system actors in Year 1 to begin building relationships, and will continue working with them to build their capacity, gradually transferring responsibilities as their level of capacity increases and they can implement interventions to schools directly (e.g. technical assistance, training, grants, etc.). Figure 3 provides an overview of the four school cohorts the project will expand to over the life of the contract and defines the implementation strategy for each cohort.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 30
Figure 3: Cohort Overview6
COHORT SELECTION
DATES
DESCRIPTION IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
1 Sept 2017
14 selected schools
Primarily direct
2 Feb 2018 TBD newly selected schools Primarily direct
3 Sept 2018 TBD newly selected schools Direct and indirect with education
system synergies
4 Sept 2019 TBD newly selected schools Direct and indirect in collaboration
with SEDUC
Each cohort will receive two years of direct intervention, after which time and based on results and performance, each school will be evaluated to determine one of three outcomes: Graduation (criteria: SBV reduced, effective programs in place, committed leadership); Continuation (criteria: significant progress but continued support required to ensure sustainability); Withdrawal (criteria: no significant progress, no committed leadership).
Strategic school selection process
Figure 6 summarizes the proposed school selection process from Year 2 onwards. At the center of the graphic is technical support to SEDUC to help it design and apply a simple SBV survey and categorize schools accordingly. Once SEDUC has established a list of categorized and prioritized schools, the universe of schools will be narrowed down to PBS communities selected under the five DO1 municipalities. Within that group, we will apply an agreed-upon set of measurable selection criteria, including: their presence in PBS communities, recent decreases in matriculation and attendance rates, demonstrated willingness of school leadership to participate in the program, local resources, and strength of the social asset network. After schools are selected, a relationship-building process will commence prior to the application of a simplified project diagnostic that will serve to gather detailed information on the school system, undertake baseline data collection, and determine priorities for specialized interventions.
6 Final numbers of schools will be determined by January 2018 in consultation with USAID.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 31
Figure 4: School selection process
Coordination
A key element of success of Asegurando’s work and therefore directly built into the four
project objectives is the importance of cross-sectoral collaboration and coordination. The graphic below provides an overview of the approach to coordination and ways in which Asegurando will engage with key actors and related processes. Figure 5 illustrates the relationships and mechanisms of our coordination strategy.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 32
Figure 5: Coordination Model
,2,4
The four major collaboration counterparts for the project include Schools (Project Objectives 1,2,3 and 4), Networks (Project Objectives 1, 2 and 4), SEDUC and decentralized agencies (Project Objectives 1, 2, and 3), and with USAID and other donors. The section below summarizes how the project will coordinate with each counterpart.
● School Community. Asegurando will work with schools and major stakeholders to improve their capacity to prevent, respond, report, and monitor SBV, improving access, retention, and learning, as well as overall school safety. School interventions will be both direct and indirect and include diverse tasks such as the provision of technical assistance to increase SBVP technical know-how, training of teachers and management staff, prosocial activities with students (e.g., rallies, workshops, extra-curricular clubs), provision of technical assistance to increase school capacity for referrals (e.g., protocols and systems), secondary prevention activities with students selected by a screening process, and provision of in-kind grants to improve school safety. Over time, the project will shift from implementing direct interventions to supporting indirect interventions undertaken by educational system partners and networks, with whom Asegurando will cultivate solid relationships over time, thus linking all project objectives.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 33
● Networks. Asegurando will directly support the formation of social asset networks, expand participation and deepen engagement in existing networks, and facilitate network processes to better support school systems to prevent and respond to SBV. One subset of the networks are service providers that can support care and treatment needs. Service providers will join other actors, including governmental and non-governmental education actors, NGOs, CSOs, FBOs, businesses, and academia to form broad support networks at the local, regional, and national levels. These networks will be supported to participate in effective responses to SBV, mobilize resources, provide leadership and mentorship services, and advocate for school system improvements. Collaboration between and within the networks and educational system actors, particularly schools, will be especially critical to achieve Project Objectives 1, 2 and 4.
● SEDUC and decentralized agencies. Asegurando’s primary government counterpart is SEDUC. Going beyond coordination and collaboration, the project will provide direct interventions to strengthen capacity of SEDUC to address SBV issues, institutionalize models, undertake policy reform, and ensure sustainability. The project will map the competencies of other key national government social protection agencies and undertake a gap analysis to identify areas where the project should focus support for SEDUC institutions to execute their roles in school safety. The facilitated relationships between SEDUC and a wide variety of government and non-government actors will link Project Objectives 1,2, and 3.
● USAID, DO1 projects, and other donors. Asegurando will work to ensure that the project meets USAID’s needs and expectations under both its DO1 and Education Strategy goals. It will provide inputs for Mission relationships and negotiations with the Honduran government. Working with other USAID partners and projects, Asegurando will seek to build partnerships, identify synergies, and coordinate interventions, particularly at the local school level, respecting and articulating the roles of distinct USAID projects. When appropriate, Asegurando will represent USAID in technical meetings with other donor agencies working on SBV to improve coordination and avoid duplication of effort. Asegurando will take a lead role in coordinating with other DO1 projects, for example the Reading Project at the school level. We will also coordinate with broader community violence prevention projects, particularly on secondary prevention and screening tools, safe schools, extra-curricular activities, and other collective actions.
Sustainability
A primary goal of all Asegurando activities is to institutionalize capacities and system improvements so that they are sustainable beyond the life of the project. To ensure sustainability, the project will strategically focus on key factors in the system most likely to respond to and institutionalize change, including:
● Leadership of SEDUC at all levels to institutionalize educational system strengthening interventions. Working towards the institutionalization of models, Asegurando will support SEDUC and other key actors in the education system by providing direct assistance and promoting local ownership. The role of SEDUC is particularly important to enshrine advances in policy, plan for ongoing implementation, and elicit the support of key stakeholders. As such, Asegurando will enhance SEDUC’s institutional capacity and promote its leadership development in
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 34
designing and rolling out new policies, always looking for ways to put SEDUC in the lead. One example includes working with the Ministry on the design of school diagnostics and putting in place a categorization system. Asegurando will provide key technical support to strengthen the three Violence Prevention Commissions and consider providing the services of a Technical Secretary for the Commissions.
● Provision of implicit positive incentives. Asegurando recognizes that schools in Honduras are already severely overburdened dealing with their day-to-day activities, and thus the project will seek to affect sustainable change by creating demand from the schools, supply from SEDUC, and putting the correct positive incentives in place for both stakeholders. For example, Asegurando will encourage recognition of model schools by both SEDUC and the USG.
● Levels of community mobilization and engagement. Equitable community participation is of utmost importance in education, especially in highly volatile environments. By actively engaging community members and ensuring their ownership of project objectives, the project will leverage additional resources to support project interventions. Local engagement offers existing assets and know-how, human capital, and resilience strategies to mitigate the effects of violence. Once the improvements in the school and community settings are seen and valued, with greater educational opportunities and activities for youth, the community itself will become the greatest advocate for continuation over time.
● Formation of teacher and peer support groups and systems. Achievements can quickly evaporate over time if efficient support systems are not consolidated. By working with school cohorts, Asegurando will set up peer support systems, particularly for teachers and school administrators, and work to ensure they are
self-sustainable. Students particularly those targeted for secondary prevention
services and/or treatment and care services will benefit from both a mentorship program as well as peer-to-peer support groups to extend the positive impact of the interventions and institutionalize ongoing support.
NEXT STEPS
This concept note has laid out a revised approach and strategic overview for Asegurando la Educación based on discussions with USAID and SEDUC, as well as the lessons learned during the first nine months of implementation. Concurrent to this process, and taking into account initial feedback on the concept note, the team is working on the operationalization of the strategy, to be presented as part of the Year 2 work plan. Once USAID has provided feedback on the concept note and the new strategic focus of the project is validated, the Work Plan will be submitted for review. A key element of the Year 2 Work Plan will be further details on the methodology for Phase 2 to implement select CORE interventions7 at the school level by February 2018. As part of this process, Asegurando will undertake a detailed budget review and propose the number of target schools in each cohort that the current contract budget can accommodate. Concurrent to the implementation of the select CORE interventions starting in February 2018, design of additional CORE interventions as well as SPECIALIZED interventions will be undertaken in Phase 3, with full delivery in Phase
7 Interventions could be components of a model or standalone activities.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 35
4 and adaption/institutionalization in Phase 5. Figure 6 below summarizes the major next steps to implement the project strategy and a timeframe for delivery of each.
Figure 6: Summary of next steps
ACTION ACTIVITIES TIMEFRAME
Finish planning
processes
1. Finalize methodology
2. Undertake budget review
3. Determine numbers of schools for each cohort.
4. Develop Y2 work plan and present to USAID for
approval
Dec 2017
Phase 2: Rapid
design of elements
of CORE
interventions
5. Prepare and present Phase 2 plan to USAID
6. Complete identification of intervention areas,
models, and methodologies and prioritize for
Phase 2
7. Design CORE package (first version)
Dec 2017 – Jan 2018
Cohort 2 selection
8. Review and apply selection criteria
9. Select second cohort of schools (USAID
approval)
10. Undertake relationship building processes
Jan – Feb 2018
Phase 2: Roll out
CORE intervention
package for Cohorts
1 and 2
11. Finalize implementation strategies (direct or
indirect) and mechanisms (staff, contracts,
consultancies, etc.)
12. Deliver select CORE intervention package to
Cohorts 1 and 2
Feb – Nov 2018
Phase 3: Adapt and
design new CORE
intervention package
13. Gather feedback on implementation
14. Review successes and challenges
15. Expand menu of interventions
16. Adjust and adapt as needed
Mar – Oct 2018
Phase 3: Design
SPECIALIZED
interventions
17. Identification and planning of specialized models
18. Identification of priorities of participating schools May – Oct 2018
Phase 4: Deliver full
packages of CORE
and SPECIALIZED
interventions
18. Select Cohort 3 and 4 schools
19. Undertake relationship building activities with
selected schools
20. Deliver CORE and specialized intervention models Nov 2018 – Nov 2021
Phase 5: Adaptation
and refinement of
CORE and
SPECIALIZED
interventions and
transfer to education
systems
21. Collect implementation data
22. Implement collaborative and adaptive learning
strategy
23. Adjust interventions
24. Transfer models to education system actors
Ongoing
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 36
ANNEX A: ASEGURANDO LA EDUCACIÓN LOGICAL FRAMEWORK
PROJECT GOAL: CITIZEN SECURITY INCREASED FOR VULNERABLE POPULATIONS WHILE EXPANDING EQUITABLE
ACCESS TO EDUCATION FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH IN URBAN, HIGH-CRIME AREAS
Narrative Summary Indicators Data Sources Assumptions Risk Mitigation Strategies
Project Purpose:
Improve the resilience of educational systems in Honduras by strengthening the
capacity of system actors to prevent, respond, report and monitor SBV in order to improve access, retention, and learning.
1. Percentage of students, teachers and
administrators who feel safe in the school environment;
2. Percentage of students
achieving satisfactory or advanced ratings on
standardized tests in Spanish or Math in
Grades 4-9 in selected schools;
3. Percentage of change in attendance of the
enrolled students in selected schools;
4. Change in school abandonment due to
SBV
Surveys; school records and information
provided by MOE and selected partner schools.
Political will from the GOH to invest in the education
sector prioritizing SBV
Continuity of policies during political transition
Security conditions at the
community level do not severely impede project
activities
USAID negotiations with GOH
Thorough security protocols by the project
Design of effective implicit incentives and partnership
building
Sub-purposes, Outputs and Inputs
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 37
SUB-PURPOSE 1: Improved ability of
schools to reduce SBV through the creation of safe learning environments
5. Decrease in rate of
violence reported by teachers and students
6. Reduction in tolerance toward GBV
Surveys School actors are willing
and able to participate in interventions
Schools' management prioritizes involvement in
the project and facilitate teachers' participation
Design of effective implicit
incentives
Partnerships with and commitments from schools
Output 1.1: CORE and SPECIALIZED packages of interventions developed/refined
and delivered to schools Inputs:
Identify and map existing programs that meet the demands of the Core and Specialized packages
Develop new/adapt existing training materials
Provide training to school actors (teachers, administrators, parents) directly or through education system leverages, based on Core and
Specialized packages Provide technical assistance to schools
to implement new learning
7. Number of teachers and administrators
who successfully complete CORE and SPECIALIZED package interventions;
8. Percentage of
teachers who apply key SBV prevention
concepts in the classroom and other school settings
Training participation records; Annual Action
Plans/Observation Checklist
Teachers have the availability and time to be
part of the training programs comprised in the Core and Specialized packages
Education system actors have clear competencies
and implicit incentives to engage in the delivery of
these interventions (training, technical assistance, services)
Students attendance to
schools and their willingness to participate and engage in
project related activities
Design of implicit incentives
Negotiations with schools to enable participation
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 38
Output 1.2: Referral system in schools
(including teachers' ability to identify risk behaviors) developed and implemented Inputs:
Training and support schools in strengthening and/or developing referral
protocols and procedures Facilitate partnerships between schools
and social asset networks and their
members
9. Percentage of
students, teachers and administrators who are aware of how to prevent, avoid and respond to SBV, including SGBV,
thanks to support from the network
Surveys and Tools Schools have the minimum
conditions to develop and implement referral systems
Social asset actors’ services can be made available to all
project schools Social asset actors have the
capacity to respond to referrals and provide timely and quality services
Temporary support to
external actors and/or schools to provide technical services (e.g. psycho-social support) to participating schools.
Output 1.3: Capacity of education system actors improved to deliver Core and
Specialized packages to schools.
Inputs:
Map out key education system leverages/actors
Asses competency and capacity level
Provide training to improve capacity in specific areas
Transfer methodologies
Provide assistance to deliver packages to schools (indirect
intervention)
10. Number of education system actors
delivering intervention packages
to schools
Pre/post Assessment Education system actors have clear competencies to
engage in the delivery of these interventions (training, technical assistance, services) and have the minimum level of capacity to engage
Targeted support to education system actors
who require additional competencies
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 39
SUB-PURPOSE 2: Strengthened school
networks that increase school safety
11. Percentage of
network actors with improved capacity to support SBV prevention
Surveys / tool Social asset network
members have the minimal necessary capacity to receive project support and provide services required by schools
Conditions of security in
communities are permissible for direct engagement with network members
Effective selection
protocols of asset network members
Targeted support to education system actors to
identify and address gaps
Output 2.1: Establishment of social asset networks
Inputs:
Map network partners
Support key actors in the development of the network
Technical support to selected organizations to lead networks
12. Network actor collaboration index
13. Number of network actors who successfully complete SBV awareness and
engagement training and are able to lead
the network
Vignettes; surveys / tool Social asset actors are willing to be part of a network
Selected organizations confirm their commitment to leading the networks
Government participants receive a clear mandate
from central structures to participate
Implicit incentives structures
USAID negotiations
Output 2.2: Capacity of network and network members to respond to school needs increased
Inputs:
Conduct needs assessment of network members
Develop protocols for coordination and collaboration as a network and with the schools
Coordinate with MOE and other
relevant entities to provide assistance to network actors
14. Number of network actors who successfully complete
SBV awareness and engagement training
15. Number of social asset network actors who engage with intervention schools on violence prevention activities
MOU, Grants, Teachers’ Annual Action Plans; Survey / tools
Schools can articulate clear
needs that can be met by network members
Targeted support to
education system actors who require additional
competencies Identify alternative logistics
options
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 40
Conduct demonstration projects
(small grants) to promote best practices
Output 2.3: Relationship between schools and communities strengthened Inputs:
Organize and host community /
school events Develop service learning /
community service opportunities for students
16. Number of community engagement projects implemented in intervention schools
related to SBV
MOU; reports on events and service learning projects
Conditions of security are permissible for the organization of community
events Network members and
other community actors can create meaningful and safe
service-learning opportunities for students
Community actors perceive positive shifts in the school
setting to stimulate engagement
Use of technology for non-essential activities
Strong communication
strategies
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 41
SUB-PURPOSE 3: Increased capacity of
MOE and social protection actors to prevent and respond to SBV
17. Capacity index of
MOE to prevent, respond to, monitor and report SBV
18. Capacity index of key social protection actors to prevent,
respond to, monitor and report SBV
Surveys / tool Political conditions in
Honduras permit direct work with the MOE and other social protection actors
MOE and social protection actors are politically willing
and administratively capable to work with the project
USAID collaboration and
negotiation with MOE and other actors (when appropriate)
Continued project
engagement and communication with MOE
Output 3.1: Capacity of the MOE to develop, implement and monitor guidelines
and protocols for SBV increased
Inputs:
Assess existing guidelines and protocols in the MOE focused on SBV
Provide technical assistance and support to MOE to develop and
implement guidelines and protocols Monitor implementation of
guidelines and protocols
19. Number of new SBV-related guidelines
created or old guidelines adapted by
MOE 20. Percent of
intervention schools implementing MOE SBV and SRGBV guidelines;
Records from MOE; Record guidelines and
tools
MOE is willing and available to work with the project
There is continuity in the MOE staff engaged with the
project
MOE and other donors are willing to review and modify existing technical
methodologies
USAID collaboration and negotiation with MOE and
other donors
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 42
Output 3.2: Collaboration and cooperation
between the MOE and key social protection actors increased that support targeted schools Inputs:
Generate database of key social
protection actors Map out social protection
actors’ legal competencies and
service gaps Facilitate agreements between MOE
and social protection actors
Technical assistance to MOE to coordinate and support social protection actors
21. Number of key social
protection actors supporting schools to address SBV
22. Number of agreements between MOE and social
protection actors
MOU, school records
and reports MOE is willing to
collaborate and cooperate with identified social protection actors
Social protection actors
have the political will to engage with the project
MOE is able to take on a leadership role and assign adequate staffing to this
effort
Facilitation of partnership
and trust-building exercises
Output 3.3: Programs and policies that strengthen the education system's resilience institutionalized
Input: Provide technical support to MOE
to identify and formulate policies and norms based on the projects
partners' best practices
Assist in the implementation of the norms, guidelines and policies
Technical support to MOE to
document and disseminate interventions
23. Number of modified or new SBV-related guidelines, protocols and policies adopted
by MOE and relevant entities in the
education system
Policies and official guidelines
MOE is politically willing and administratively capable to move forward with the institutionalization of
specific programs and policies derived from the
project
Political changes in the
government do not affect processes of institutionalization
Clear design of action steps for institutionalization and technical support
Advocacy campaigns with stakeholders
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 43
SUB-PURPOSE 4: Strengthened capacity
of schools and network actors to lower risk factors and enhance protective factors for students who qualified for secondary prevention services (SPS)
24. Percentage of SPS
students who maintain or lower their risk level
Surveys / tool Education system and social
protection actors have clear competencies to engage in the delivery of specialized interventions (training, technical assistance, services)
Caregivers and families are willing to have their children engage in secondary
prevention activities
Contingency plans to
support gaps in the delivery of secondary prevention services
Direct engagement and
effective communication with parents / caregivers
Output 4.1: Package of secondary prevention models (largely based on SPECIALIZED package) adapted, refined and implemented in schools
Inputs:
Models of secondary prevention adapted to local context
Increase coverage through coordination with other actors/projects for the provision of secondary prevention services
25. Number of SPS providers trained in SBV prevention and response
26. Number of SPS providers that define
service packages that are responsive to the
unique needs of each school and community
Attendance sheets, training records; SPS reports
Teachers and other school actors have the availability and interest to engage in secondary prevention
strategies Students and their families
that require secondary services can be clearly
identified and willing to receive services
Schools are willing to extend hours to facilitate
certain services.
Temporary support to external actors and/or schools to provide technical services (e.g.
psychological counselling) to students
Technical assistance to put in place quality screening
systems
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 44
Output 4.2: Secondary prevention
interventions aligned with school referral systems Inputs:
Establish feed-back reporting systems between service providers
and schools Develop data base to track cases
27. Number of at-risk
youth identified through customized screening model
28. Number of referred at-risk students receiving the
appropriate level of support from SPS
actors
Tools applied; SPS
reports, Referral Forms, Parent or tutor letter authorization
Parents / caregivers provide
consent for their children to receive secondary prevention interventions
Schools and network actors
maintain strict safety policies and procedures that
protect the participants of secondary prevention interventions
Communication strategies
and effective monitoring plan
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 45
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 46
ANNEX B: GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF
CONFLICT-SENSITIVE EDUCATION
The following principles are adapted from the set of Guiding Principles of Conflict-Sensitive Education developed by the Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE).8 These principles are important because they govern the interaction between the project and the communities where it operates. They set a foundation for the project to build on and give guidance when there are questions on strategies and approaches.
1. Do No Harm. Education interventions in conflict-affected environments are not neutral. They may reduce or increase the risk of conflict. The project will work to ensure that: (1) program strategies incorporate considerations of the context; (2) staff and partners apply conflict-sensitive programming; (3) programs do not intentionally favor one group over another; (4) education does not reflect and/or perpetuate gender and social inequities.
2. Prioritize Prevention. This principle refers to strategies to prevent violence and protect beneficiaries. Through its implementation, the project will: (1) protect teachers and learners from attack and being recruited by criminal groups; (2) protect learning environments from attacks; (3) focus on safety for students and teachers; and (4) educate on risks such as gangs, substance abuse, and other risk factors.
3. Promote Equity and Holistic Development. This principle refers to treating all project beneficiaries and stakeholders fairly and equitably. Under this principle, the project will: (1) avoid exclusion and marginalization; (2) provide psycho-social protection for learners; and (3) involve parents, communities, civil society, and local leadership.
4. Assess. The project will thoughtfully carry out these strategies informed by an education and conflict analysis to understand: (1) the relationship between conflict and education; (2) how conflict affects education; (3) how education may fuel conflict; and (4) how education can mitigate conflict.
8 See INEE Guiding Principles on Integrating Conflict Sensitivity in Education Policy and Programming in Conflict-
affected and Fragile Contexts
http://toolkit.ineesite.org/toolkit/INEEcms/uploads/1150/INEE_Guiding_principles_A3_English[1].pdf
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 47
Table 1(a): MELP Indicator progress - USAID Standard Indicators and Project Custom Indicators
[Strategic Objective]
Indicator Data
Source
Baseline data FY 2016 Quarterly Status – FY 2012 Annual Performance Achieved to Date (in %)
Comment(s)
Year Value Annual
Cumulative Planned target
Annual Cumulative
Actual Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Intermediate Result (IR):
Sub-IR:
Sub-IR:
Intermediate Result (IR):
Sub-IR:
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #3 48
ANNEX C: PROGRESS SUMMARY
This annex will be completed in future reports upon USAID approval of the project MEL Plan.
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 49
ANNEX E: GEOGRAPHIC DATA AND
CARTOGRAPHIC PRODUCT REPORTING
USAID has been geo-referencing all project activity location data via ArcGIS at this link: http://arcg.is/LXzjy. The information there includes GPS information for all
project sites, including both implementing organization offices and locations of all sites benefitting from project resources (communities, schools, clinics, etc.).
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 50
ANNEX D: SUCCESS STORIES
CREATING SCHOOLS THAT CONQUER FEAR "Being a teacher," she says, "is
not easy, especially when you are assigned to poor, marginalized communities, in
environments where there is no security, and the street is
dominated by violent groups." As Deputy Director of the Mexico Institute in a
neighborhood of Tegucigalpa, Sandra Trejo has lived with
these circumstances for the last ten years. Working together with several
generations of children and teachers, Sandra’s community
has made a great effort to improve these circumstances. Fear exists and thrives daily in the corners of many schools in Honduras. This fear
causes children to leave schools, forces families to hide their children (or try to), and prevents teachers from happily teaching lessons to their students about life, nature,
and the future. With fear, there is no future. Sandra has seen everything in her years of work as an educator: children who leave
school and do not return; girls held back by poverty and subjected to abuse and harassment for being girls; teen pregnancies; vulnerable children who are lured by
the promise of easy money to sell drugs in schools; obvious injuries to children’s bodies and souls from dangerous homes. These conditions create an atmosphere of constant fear and uncertainty in schools.
How can we ensure that schools are zones of support and protection? How do we
ensure that every classroom is a healing, motivating, and encouraging gateway to a bright future? How do we provide effective support for teachers, parents, and students? How do we overcome fear?
"As Deputy Director of the Mexico Institute, we are getting involved in improving and creating the change that the community needs. The USAID Asegurando la
Educacion project is strengthening our training capacity by supporting teachers on violence prevention. We are developing basic tools to plan extracurricular activities
and special initiatives with students, parents, and the community. We are going to
Sandra Trejo, Deputy Director of the Mexico
Institute, a counterpart school of the USAID Securing
Education project in Tegucigalpa, Honduras
USAID/Honduras School-Based Violence Prevention Activity
Quarterly Report #4 51
organize a team of teachers to be able to respond to the situations that our students experience. WE ARE GOING TO OVERCOME FEAR!"