111 AIPLA

Firm Logo

American Intellectual Property Law Association

U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs

John (Jack) J. Penny, VEvent Name

Location

XX March 2014

222 AIPLA

Firm Logo

U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs

• BACKGROUND– In December 2012, U.S. President Barack Obama

enacted the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012 (PLTIA)

– Title I of PLTIA amends the U.S. patent laws (35 U.S.C.) to implement the provisions of 1999 Geneva Act of the “Hague Agreement Concerning International Registrations of Industrial Designs” (Hague Agreement)

– The Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement (administered by the WIPO) establishes a centralized procedure by which global examination of design applications can be conducted

333 AIPLA

Firm Logo

U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs

• BACKGROUND (cont’d)– The Hague Agreement creates a new single,

standardized international design application by which an applicant can apply for design protection in all member countries

– Allows U.S. applicants to request design protection in the European Union and 44 contracting parties of the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement

– Non-U.S. applicants can file a Hague design application designating the U.S. for examination by the U.S. PTO

444 AIPLA

Firm Logo

U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs

• STATUS– 29 November 2013, U.S. PTO published proposed

rules to implement the Hague Agreement– Written comments on the proposed rule changes

were due by 28 January 2014– Changes will take effect upon “the entry into force

of the Hague Agreement with respect to the United States”

555 AIPLA

Firm Logo

U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs

• MAJOR CHANGES– Term of design patents increases to 15 years (from

14 years) from issuance (35 U.S.C. §173)– Provides U.S. domestic priority (35 U.S.C. §386(c))– Provides foreign priority (35 U.S.C. § §386(a), (b),

see also Geneva Act Art. 6(1)(a)-(2) – Paris Convention priority must be recognized)

– International design applications that designate the US have the same effective filing date as a U.S. national design app. (Geneva Act, Art. 14(1), 35 U.S.C. § 385)

666 AIPLA

Firm Logo

U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs

• MAJOR CHANGES (cont’d)– Provide provisional patent rights for published

international applications that designate the U.S.• If issued U.S. design patent is substantially similar to

published international application, patent owner is entitled to a reasonable royalty between publication and U.S. issue date (see 35 U.S.C. §154(d)(1))

– Establishes U.S. PTO as office through which international design applications can be filed

777 AIPLA

Firm Logo

U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs

• SUBSTANTIVE EXAMINATION OF DESIGN IN U.S.– Under Article 12 of the Geneva Act provides that any

Contracting Party may reject the industrial designs “where the conditions for grant of protection under the law of the Contracting Party are not met”

– PLTAI provides that “[t]he Director shall cause an examination to be made … of an international design application” (see 35 U.S.C. §389(a))

– Therefore, the examination in the U.S. of any design patent application designating the U.S. shall be conducted according to U.S. patent laws (see 35 U.S.C. §389(b)), which includes a substantive examination process (some countries don’t have)

888 AIPLA

Firm Logo

U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs

• SINGLE DESIGN INVENTIONS IN THE U.S.– The Hague system allows for applicants to include

up to 100 designs in a single registration if all of the designs are in the same Locarno class

– But, in the U.S., a design patent must be directed to a single invention (see MPEP § 1502.01(D))

– U.S. PTO will issue a restriction requirement(s) if more than one patentably distinct design is shown in the drawings

– Therefore, while the international application may contain many designs (up to 100), divisional applications may be required in the U.S.

999 AIPLA

Firm Logo

U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs

• SINGLE DESIGN INVENTIONS IN THE U.S. (cont’d)– Recent U.S. Federal Circuit case1 held that

prosecution history estoppel does apply to U.S. design patents when figures are cancelled due to a restriction requirement

– In order to avoid prosecution estoppel, and to secure protection for the cancelled figures, divisional applications must be filed directed to the non-elected embodiments

1 Pacific Coast Marine Windshields, Ltd, v. Malibu Boats, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2014)

101010 AIPLA

Firm Logo

U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs

• PRACTICE HINTS– Consider all options when applying for international

design protection– While Hague Agreement offers a simplified

procedure for filing in all member countries, there are some disadvantages• Single set of drawings is used in all designated countries• Drawing requirements may be different in some countries• Local examination process and legal standard remains

unchanged– When selecting countries, consider strength of

enforcement, where product will be sold/copied, prosecution costs, etc.

111111 AIPLA

Firm Logo

Thanks for your attention! Questions?

John (Jack) J. Penny VPartner, Chair Intellectual

Property GroupNutter McClennen & Fish, LLP

155 Seaport Blvd.Boston, MA 02110

+1-617-439-2566

jpenny@nutter.com