u.s. department of energy’s initiatives for proliferation prevention in russia: results of...
TRANSCRIPT
U.S. Department of Energy’s Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention in Russia:
Results of Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Project, Year 2
Y. Pokhitonov, V. KamachevV.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, Russia
D. KelleyPacific Nuclear Solutions, USA
Purpose of Project
• IPP sponsored by DOE to engage Russian weapons scientists in peaceful use of existing and newly developed technologies (17 projects underway)
• DOE’s IPP program is a mechanism for U.S. private sector companies to enter Russian market: radwaste treatment
• Introduce USA environmental technology to weapons sector and seek joint technologies – first foreign firm
• Investigate solutions for Russia & USA liquid radwaste problems resulting from Cold War
• DOE compensates scientists to participate in program
• Long-term, commercialize project, employ scientists
Project Participants
• Russia– Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation (ROSATOM)– VG Khlopin Radium Institute (project manager)– Seversk (SCC ), Zheleznogorsk (MCC), Ozersk (MAYAK), Gatchyna– 90+ participants, 68 weapons scientists
• USA– Department of Energy (GIPP)– Argonne National Lab– Pacific Nuclear Solutions (project manager)
• International Science & Technology Center (ISTC)– Project administrator, Moscow
Polymer Technology
• Variety of polymers for all organic, oil and aqueous streams• Solidification of LLW, ILW & HLW• Packaging:
– Standard drums / B-25 box– Encapsulation in cement
• Disposal options:– Short term, intermediate term – Final storage– Incineration
• Advantages:– No special equipment, low cost to process / treat– High performance, long term stability, no degradation– Waste minimization: oil 2:1 or 3:1 bonding ratio (liquid : polymer)– Safe to use, safe for transport
Solidification Process
Experiments
• Stability (Differential Thermal Analysis)• Irradiation• Gas generation• Polymer solidification /capacity / evaporation• Encapsulation in cement
Differential Thermal AnalysisPolymers: N910, N930, N960Solidified samples with nitric acid and sodium nitrate possess high thermal stability
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
fact
um
wei
gh
t ch
ang
e (%
/°C
)
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
wei
gh
t ch
ang
e (%
)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Temperature (°C)
910.002 ––––––– 930.001 – – – – 960.001 ––––– ·
Universal V4.4A TA Instruments
Irradiation Tests / Results
• Extensive irradiation testing conducted, required for ROSATOM certification
– Over 25 irradiation tests– All similar outcomes with China, USA tests
• All high dose rates• Cobalt 60 gamma irradiator• One example: nitric / organic solution, solidified
30 rad per second30 days = 77 M Rad+ 73 days = 270 M Rad
• Brittle, size reduction, no degradation / leaching• Conducted for gas generation tests
Irradiation Tests
Stability and IrradiationCobalt 60, gamma installation, dose rate 3.9·10⁶ grayN960 polymer, HNO₃, 1M, after irradiationN910 polymer, oil + TBP, after irradiation
Gas Generation Tests
• Tests required to determine fire and explosion safety conditions
• Tests carried out under static conditions in sealed glass ampoules
• N960 polymer + nitric solution: no changes in the solidification and no gas release
• N910 polymer + TBP / oil: variable results • Preliminary judgment: polymers are not gas
generators
Rate of gas release during irradiation of sample: N910 polymer + 50%-TBP / 50%-oil
-0,02
0,00
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,10
0,12
0,14
0,16
0,18
0,20
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Dose, Grx103
W, m
l/h
Characteristic (composition)
of wastesConditions of solidification
Results
Volume of waste used, ml
Amount of # 960 used, g
Amount of # 910 used, g
4232Sludge residue from the bottom of the apparatus (aqueous phase). U-80g., NaNO₃~ 200g, HNO₃-0,8 M/I
6 8 0,5Successfully
solidified
4231
Sludge residue from the top of the apparatus (occurrence of organic
phase is probable). U-80g., NaNO₃~ 200g, HNO₃-0,8 M/I. Very thick black
liquid.
6 8 0,5Successfully
solidified
4237
LL decontaminationg solution with low amounts of organic substances, U-153 g/l, NaNO₃~ 100-150g, HNO₃
2,5 M/I
12 8 0,5Successfully
solidified
4238
LL decontaminating solution with low amounts of organic substances. U-153 g/l, NaNO₃~ 100-150g, HNO₃
2,5 M/I
20 4 2Successfully
solidified
4125U-20 g, NaNO₃ 40g, HNO₃ 1,2 M/I.
There was a precipitate in the solution.
15 16 0,5Successfully
solidified
4283Uranium re-extracts. U-70g, HNO₃
0,07 M/I. 20 4 1Successfully
solidified
No
Relationship between the
mass of polymer and the mass of
liquid phase, Mp:Mj
Loss of weight after
aging samples,
during 21 days, %
Amount of water absorbed by samples after solidification during 21 days. (weight of water/1
gram solidified sample)
H₂O
1 2:1 33,7 All water has been absorbed by the sample
2 1:2 66,47 All water has been absorbed by the sample
3 1:5 83,26 All water has been absorbed by the sample
NaOH, 0,1M
4 1:1 53,91 All water has been absorbed by the sample
5 1:2 66,25 All water has been absorbed by the sample
6 1:5 82,76 All water has been absorbed by the sample
HNO₃, 1,0M
7 1:1 49,73 All water has been absorbed by the sample
8 1:2 66,34 All water has been absorbed by the sample
9 1:5 82,88 All water has been absorbed by the sample
Solidified sample after addition of waterSolution: HNO₃ 1,0MNo volumetric increase
Polymer Solidification/ Capacity / Evaporation: Conclusions
• Polymer technology is irreversible, liquid permanently immobilized in polymer matrix
• Advantage: direct application of polymer to waste without conditioning / additives
• Little or no volumetric increase in the process• Appreciable volume reduction through evaporation; no
measurement of water vapor• Polymers slow the evaporation process• Polymers are versatile, solidify aqueous / organic waste
of varying acidities, specific activities, suspensions and sludge types & salts
Encapsulation of Polymer Solidification
• Cementation tests at AREVA & Sellafield successfully completed, with 90% organic / 10% aqueous streams
• When aqueous is above 10%, new technique for encapsulation is required
• Encapsulation research underway:– additives to solidification– additives to cement– tests with inorganic materials encouraging
Conclusions
• Experiments conducted thus far provide greater understanding of polymer’s capabilities
• Validates the polymer’s application with ILW / HLW waste
• First actual project planned for 1st Q, 2011– ILW aqueous waste with some organic material
• Results of work 3 sub-sites will be presented in 2011