urs scott wilson associate director [email protected] daru widyatmoko pavement...

32
URS Scott Wilson Associate Director [email protected] m Daru Widyatmoko PAVEMENT SUSTAINABILITY AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT: CASE STUDIES

Upload: nehemiah-cornett

Post on 14-Dec-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

• URS Scott Wilson

• Associate Director

[email protected]

Daru Widyatmoko

PAVEMENT SUSTAINABILITY AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT:

CASE STUDIES

Co-Authors

URS Scott Wilson

Technical Director

[email protected]

Bachar Hakim

Colas Ltd

Operations Director

[email protected]

Carl Fergusson

Introduction

• From Grooved Marshall Asphalt to Ungrooved Airfield Asphalt Concrete

• Progress to date – case studies• Friction characteristics• Sustainable pavement solutions• Benefits• Conclusions

Reasons for using improved materials

• Pressure to maximise runway availability• Low maintenance• Better whole life cost• Sustainability• Requirements to demonstrate best value

UK airfield asphalt materials

• Grooved Marshall Asphalt surfacing• Marshall Asphalt binder course• Dense Macadam binder course/base

French airfield asphalts• Ungrooved Airfield Asphalt Surfacings

– BBA (Bétons Bitumineux pour chausées Aeronautiques) surface/binder course

• High Modulus Asphalts– BBME (Bétons Bitumineux à Module Elévé)

surface course, – EME (Enrobé à Module Elévé) binder

course/base

BBA classification• Four types

Type Average Thickness (mm) Minimum thickness at any point (mm)

Continuously graded – 0/10(AC 10-BBA C) 60 - 70 40

Continuously graded – 0/14(AC 14-BBA C) 70 – 90 50

Gap-graded 0/10(AC 10-BBA D) 40 – 50 30

Gap-graded 0/14(AC 14-BBA D) 50 - 70 40

• Three classes: 1, 2 and 3 depending upon the Performance Levels

French Airfield Materials• BBA surface and binder course• French National Standards• Track records > 25 years• Performance based designfor surface and binder or base

courses that will be subjected to high traffic of heavy aircraft and includes a verification of the resistance to rutting with the wheel-tracking rut tester

mandatory in every case

applies to base, binder and surface course mixes when the determination of the stiffness of the mix is required for pavement design purposes

carried out for heavily trafficked pavements, for mixes used in base layers of new pavements or of overlays in relation to pavement design

recipe mix for non-traffic area only

Source: LPC Bituminous Mixtures Design Guide

BBA vs MA Surfacing

BBA has better stiffness, fatigue, deformation, durability and stability to receive grooving than MA

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

Performance Ratio between the AC10-BBA over AC14-MA

Stiffness

DeformationResistance

Fatigue Resistance

Resistance toMoisture Damage

Reduced thickness

Lower risk of rutting (t/w)

Better crack resistance

Durable

Grooved “BBA”

• All surfaced with grooved 0/10mm BBA (AC 10-BBA)

• The use of 0/14mm BBA (AC 10-BBA) as enhanced binder course

• Use of local and RAP materials

Ungrooved BBA

• July 2011: ungrooved 0/14mm BBA (AC 14-BBA D) surface course at Manchester International Airport

• March 2011: ungrooved 0/14mm BBA (AC 14-BBA D) surface course and binder course at London Southend Airport

Class and type of BBA materialsMaterial ID MAT-01 MAT-02 MAT-03 MAT-04 MAT-05

Mix AC10-BBA D AC10-BBA D AC10-BBA C AC14-BBA D AC10-BBA C

Nominal Aggregate Size

0/10mm 0/10mm 0/10mm 0/14mm 0/10mm

Type of Grading Discontinuous Discontinuous Continuous Discontinuous Continuous

Layer Surface Course Surface Course Surface Course Binder Course Surface Course

Binder Pen 40/60+ Pen 40/60+ Colflex N Pen 35/50+ Colflex N

Class 3 3 3 2 2

Design Level 3 2 3 3 3

Coarse Aggregate PSV

66 58 55 – 60 48 60

Fine Aggregate PSV (parent rock)

66 65 55 – 60 53 48

Surface Characteristics• Texture depth

– Minimum average texture depth of 1mm (ICAO and CAP168 of CAA)

– Minimum texture depth of 0.6mm on runways for 90% of the zones tested (AFNOR, 1999)

• Wet friction characteristics – Using Continuous Friction Measurement Equipment (CFME), such

as Mu-Meter, Grip Tester and IMAG.

Continuous Friction

Measuring Equipment

Minimum Design Objective Level

(DOL)

Maintenance Planning Level

(MPL)Minimum Friction

Level (MFL)

CAA ICAO CAA ICAO CAA ICAO

Mu-meter 0.72 0.72 0.57 0.52 0.50 0.42

Grip Tester 0.80 0.74 0.63 0.53 0.55 0.43Note: CAA specifies water depth of 0.5mm and 0.25mm for the wet friction assessment using Mu-meter and Grip Tester respectively, whilst ICAO specifies water depth of 1mm for these tests.

European Friction Measurement

• Skid resistance – ICAO Annex 14, Vol1, Supplement A, Chapter7

Measuring apparatus Speed of test in km/h Nominal level for new runway surfaces

Skidometre BV 11 65 0.8295 0.74

IMAG 65 0.5395 0.44

ADHERA 65 0.4595 0.34

TTURL [CAP 781]

Classification • According to JAR OPS 1, paved runways which have been specially prepared

with grooves or porous pavement may be considered as having “effectively dry” braking action even when moisture is present, but provided that it is not contaminated (i.e. no WATER PATCHES or FLOODED).

But:

• How Many Grooves?

• What Size?

• What Spacing?

Early Life Surface characteristicsMaterial ID MAT-01 MAT-02 MAT-03 MAT-04 MAT-05

Mix AC10-BBA D AC10-BBA D AC10-BBA C AC14-BBA D AC10-BBA C

Layer Surface Course Surface Course Surface Course Binder Course Surface Course

Mean Texture Depth as Laid

0.8mm 0.6mm 0.5mm 1.0mm 0.5mm

Mean Texture depth after grooving

1.0mm 1.0mm 0.9mm *see Note 1.0mm

Groove Dimension (mm x mm x mm)

4x4x25 4x4x25 3x3x25 *see Note 4x4x25

Continuous Friction Measurement Equipment

Mu-meter at 0.5mm water depth Grip Tester at 0.25mm water depth

Average friction results prior to grooving

Not available 0.63 0.68 0.73 0.72

Average friction results after grooving

0.63 0.66 0.69 *see Note 0.72

CAA CAP 683 Requirements

MFL = 0.50,MPL = 0.57,DOL > 0.72

MFL = 0.55,MPL = 0.63,DOL > 0.80

Ungrooved Asphalt Early Life

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

0.70

0.75

0.80

AC14-BBA D [MAT-04]Ungrooved; MTD = 1.0mm

AC10-BBA C [MAT-05] BeforeGrooving; MTD = 0.5mm

AC14-MA [MAT-06] BeforeGrooving; MTD = 0.3mm

Fri

ctio

n V

alu

e (G

rip

Tes

ter

at 6

5 km

/h) mean value

minimum value

MFL

MPL

BBA BBA MA

Maintenance Planning Level

Minimum Friction Level

Ungrooved and Grooved Asphalts Early Life

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

0.70

0.75

0.80

AC14-BBA D [MAT-04]Ungrooved; MTD = 1.0mm

AC10-BBA C [MAT-05] AfterGrooving; MTD = 1.0mm

AC14-MA [MAT-06] AfterGrooving; MTD = 1.1mm

Fri

ctio

n V

alu

e (G

rip

Tes

ter

at 6

5 km

/h)

mean valueminimum value

MFL

MPL

BBA BBA MA

Maintenance Planning Level

Minimum Friction Level

Groove Retention

Changes in Friction Value with time

0.66

0.66

0.63

0.66

0.81

0.66

0.74

0.77

0.83 0.

85

0.74

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1 6 14 20 180 14 122 180 440 810 1200

Days after Laying

Fri

cti

on

Va

lue

(M

u-m

ete

r a

t 6

5 k

m/h

)

Before Grooving After Grooving

MAT-02 MAT-01

MFL

MPL

DOL

Changes in Friction Value with time, measured by Mu-Meter at water depth of 0.5mm, for MAT-01 and MAT-02 surfacings

Changes in Friction Value with time

0.55

0.60

0.65

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

Distance from Centre Line (m)(The minus sign denotes the distance to left side of the runway centre)

GT

Fri

cti

on

Va

lue

Day 770,Winter

Day 592,Summer

Day 441,Winter

Day 326,Winter

Day 201,Summer

Day 94,Winter

Day 1,Winter

DOL = 0.80

MPL = 0.63

MFL = 0.55

Changes in Friction Value with time, measured by Grip Tester, at 0.25mm water depth, MAT-05 surfacing

Sustainable Pavement Solutions

• Hot Ex Situ Recycling incorporating Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)– RAP incorporated in BBA binder course and

surface course at Jersey Airport• Repave Hot In Situ Recycling

– Repave process on taxiways at Isle of Man Airport• Full Depth Cold In Situ Recycling

– Deep recycling options adopted at Isle of Man Airport taxiways

Options and Actual TreatmentsTaxiway Conventional Design Recycling Design Actual Treatment Performed on

Taxiway

Bravo South No structural treatment required. Repave 30mm BBA.

Charlie South Remove 160mm existing pavement materials and replace with 50mm surface course on 110mm HDM binder/base.

Remove 365mm existing pavement materials and replace with 100mm surfacing on 265mm cold recycled H1 HBM material.

Remove 365mm existing pavement materials and replace with 100mm surfacing (comprising 40mm BBA surface course on 60mm HDM binder course) on 265mm cold recycled H1 HBM material.

Delta East

Delta West

Echo East Overlay with 40mm BBA surface course after repairing cracks and defects.

N/A Repave 30mm BBA.

Echo West

Foxtrot North No structural treatment required. Overlay 45mm BBA.

Foxtrot South Remove 160mm existing pavement materials and replace with 50mm surface course on 110mm HDM binder/base.

Remove 350mm existing pavement materials and replace with 100mm surfacing on 250mm cold recycled H1 HBM material.

Remove 365mm existing pavement materials and replace with 100mm surfacing (comprising 40mm BBA surface course on 60mm HDM binder course) on 265mm cold recycled H1 HBM material.

Benefits from Sustainable Pavement

• Substantial saving in cost (40%); • Energy consumption (44%), and; • Carbon dioxide emissions (32%).

Hakim, B. and Fergusson, C. Sustainable Pavement Construction at the Isle of Man Airport. Asphalt Professional No. 46, November 2010

Conclusions (1)• Use of BBA for binder course when runways are in

temporary condition is advantageous;

• Greater length of Temporary Total Ungrooved Runway Length (TTURL) can be considered when BBA is used;

• Rapid achievement of Design Objective Level (DOL) friction;

Conclusions (2)• BBA groove stability is not an issue;• A good comparison can be made between the

ungrooved AC 14-BBA D, grooved AC 10-BBA, and grooved AC 14-MA in terms of friction;

• AC 14-BBA D have now been used in surface course;

• Sustainable pavement solutions can be incorporated and were regarded cost effective

Thank You