urban design brief - waterloo, ontario · an urban design brief is required as part of a complete...
TRANSCRIPT
Urban Design Brief
40 Blue Springs Drive
Club Willowells
City of Waterloo Official Plan Amendment Zoning By-law Amendment December 2017
Contents
1. Background ............................................................................1
Proposal ...................................................................................1
Application ...............................................................................1
Purpose and Outline ................................................................1
Supporting Studies & Materials ...............................................1
2. Proposed Development Details ...........................................2
3. Existing Site Conditions .......................................................7
Location and Description .........................................................7
Existing Topography ................................................................8
Existing Buildings ....................................................................8
Existing Access and Parking ...................................................8
Existing Vegetation ..................................................................8
4. Surrounding Context ...........................................................10
Broader Area Context ............................................................10
Abutting Property Context .....................................................11
5. Policy & Guideline Framework .......................................... 12
Waterloo Official Plan ............................................................ 12
Waterloo Urban Design Manual ............................................ 13
6. Design Basis & Response .................................................. 14
Existing Vegetation and Grading .......................................... 14
Character ............................................................................... 15
Building Massing ................................................................... 16
Building Articulation & Materials............................................ 19
Building Base ........................................................................ 19
Circulation, Connectivity and Transit-Oriented Design ......... 24
Parking .................................................................................. 25
Landscape Design, Amenities and Open Space .................. 26
Sustainable Design ............................................................... 27
7. Conclusions ......................................................................... 28
APPENDIX A Shadow Impact Graphics
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 1 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
1. Background
Proposal
Club Willowells is proposing a mixed, higher intensity residential
building on a site within the existing “Willowells” neighbourhood in
Waterloo. The proposed building is a 15-storey hybrid form of
building containing 179 residential units, comprised of a base with
townhouse units lining the edge of an apartment form and a tower
that extends from this base. The proposed development would see
the demolition of the existing recreation building and outdoor facilities
on the site and the construction of the residential building.
Application
The site is designated “Open Space” in the Waterloo Official Plan
and “Green Zone” in the Waterloo Zoning By-law, neither of which
permit the proposed residential development. The proposed Official
Plan Amendment seeks to redesignate the site to a “Mixed Use
Residential” designation while the proposed Zoning By-law
Amendment seeks to rezone the site to a “Multiple Residential
(MR25) Zone” with site-specific regulations tailored to the site and
the proposed development concept.
Purpose and Outline
An Urban Design Brief is required as part of a complete application
for the proposed Amendments, per the June 2017 pre-application
consultation meeting for the site. The Urban Design Report is
specifically meant to include “a review of the City’s Urban Design
Manual as well as provide design direction for the development of
the lands”. Accordingly, this Urban Design Report:
o Outlines the key development details of the proposed
development (Section 2)
o Describes the site’s existing physical conditions (Section 3);
o Describes the site’s surrounding context (Section 4);
o Summarizes the principal City policy and guideline documents
applicable to the subject site and the relevant sections as they
relate to the proposed development (Section 5);
o Overviews how the proposed design incorporates and
responds to the applicable design-related policies and
guidelines (Section 6); and,
o Summarizes the design merits of the proposed development
(Section 7).
Supporting Studies & Materials
This Urban Design Report has considered the following plans and
reports supporting the proposed application as well as relevant City
policy and guidelines documents:
o Conceptual Site Plan drawings prepared by ABA Architects;
o Building elevation and renderings by ABA Architects;
o Shadow impact graphics prepared by ABA Architects;
o General Vegetative Overview and Tree Management Plan
prepared by GSP Group;
o Planning Justification Report prepared by GSP Group;
o The City of Waterloo Official Plan;
o The City of Waterloo Zoning By-law No. 1418; and,
o The City of Waterloo Urban Design Manual.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 2 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
2. Proposed Development Details
The proposed development contains a 15-storey
multiple residential building containing 179 units
in total. The building includes a 5-storey base that
incorporates including 2-storey townhouse units
that line the edges of the building base (and line
internally the parking garage) and apartment
units above making up the remainder of the base.
An 10-storey tower extends from the 5-storey
base at the southwest corner of the site. A
parking garage incorporated as one underground
level and two above-grade levels provides a total
of 200 parking spaces. Building amenity features
include an indoor amenity room, a rooftop
communal amenity terrace, individual unit
terraces or balconies, and an at-grade communal
open space.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 3 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 4 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
The plan of the building’s ground floor shows the active ground floor uses (lobby and townhouse units)
lining Blue Springs Drive.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 5 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
The plan of the building’s 3rd floor shows the stepped-back upper storeys and walkout individual terraces.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 6 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
The plan of the building’s 6th floor shows the tower footprint and the communal amenity terraces and
green roofs sitting atop the building base.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 7 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
3. Existing Site Conditions
Location and Description
The subject site is a 1-hectare parcel forming part
of the property known municipally as 40 Blue
Springs Drive in Waterloo. This parcel is
intended to be severed from the remainder of the
5-hectare property that is not subject to the
proposed development and applications (“subject
site” or “site” throughout this Urban Design Brief
refers to this 1-hecare parcel that is subject to the
proposed redevelopment). The site is located on
the north side of Blue Springs Drive between King
Street North and Tealby Crescent. It has
approximately 64 metres of frontage along Blue
Springs Drive and a depth that varies owing to its
irregular shape.
Subject site’s location as part of the broader 40 Blue Springs Drive property shown in yellow (red emphasis added to Waterloo City Map base).
Site
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 8 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Existing Topography
The site is generally flat with grades that gradually drop from
southwest-to-northeast across the site towards Four Wells Lake.
Grade changes are more pronounced near the water’s edge with
retaining walls and the lakeside boardwalk.
Existing Buildings
The site currently contains the Club Willowells recreation centre with
associated outdoor recreational facilities serving the condominium
owners in the residential buildings. The 2-storey recreation centre
building contains indoor recreation and amenity space. Supporting
the internal space, the outdoors area of the site contains four outdoor
tennis courts, two shuffleboard courts, an outdoor patio and
associated parking.
Existing Access and Parking
There are two vehicular accesses to the site to the east and west of
the building respectively. There is a drop-off lane on the east side of
the building, and there is a 11-space surface parking lot on the west
side of the building. There are concrete walkways lining the building
edge and leading throughout the ground, but no defined connection
to the public sidewalk along the site’s Blue Springs Drive frontage.
Existing Vegetation
Existing vegetation on the site is generally characterized as a series
of ornamental plantings of deciduous and coniferous trees and
shrubs as well as open lawn throughout the general grounds. Most
trees and shrubs are situated near the water’s edge and building
edges.
View of subject site looking to the club house from the southeast (top) and to the clubhouse and outdoor courts from the west
(bottom).
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 9 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Approximate site boundaries for proposed development (red-line emphasis added to base from ACI Surveying)
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 10 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
4. Surrounding Context
Broader Area Context
The Willowells neighbourhood forms part of a broader mixed-use
area generally bounded by Weber Street North, Lexington
Road/Columbia Road East, and the Conestoga Parkway, and which
is bisected by the King Street corridor. Separated by the Forwell
Creek natural corridor, there is a low-rise residential neighbourhood
comprised principally of detached dwellings to the east. The King
Street corridor to the west contains a mixture of automobile-related
commercial and employment uses and forms. The larger retail node
surrounding the King Street and Weber Street intersection is situated
to the south of Blue Springs Drive.
The Willowells neighbourhood is situated at the northwestern end of
a broader greenspace corridor that stretches generally from the
Conestoga Parkway and King Street down to University Avenue and
across to Bechtel Park and ultimately the Grand River. The
neighbourhood incorporates “Four Wells Lake” which runs through
the central portion and is key element of the neighbourhood’s
amenity sitting alongside Blue Spring Park.
The Willowells neighbourhood benefits from proximity to the broader
transportation network. The neighbourhood is within 800 metres of
the Conestoga Parkway to the north and is connected to King Street
North as a north/south corridor within Waterloo, connecting to
Uptown Waterloo and Downtown Kitchener to the south and
Conestoga Mall and St. Jacobs to the north. Two GRT bus stops are
located within 200 metres of the neighbourhood just north of the
intersection of King Street North and Blue Springs Drive, providing
connections to larger hub of Conestoga Mall and the ION station.
There are sidewalks on both sides of Blue Springs Drive and King
Street North, with the nearest signalized crossing is at Blue Springs
Drive and King Street North. The Forwell Trail provides pedestrian
connections through the greenspace corridor to the north/east of the
neighbourhood.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 11 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Abutting Property Context
Northeast/East: the northern and eastern sides of the subject site
abut the edges of the central, largest portion of the Four Well Lake
which stretches throughout the Willowells neighbourhood. Across
the waterbody, three 6-storey residential buildings (50, 52 and 54
Blue Springs Drive) face the east side of the subject site.
Northwest/West: an 8/9-storey residential building sits on the
property (30 Blue Springs Drive) abutting the northwest and west
sides of the subject site. The building’s position is separated from
the subject site by the entrance driveway from Blue Springs Drive
and this building’s surface parking area to the front. Beyond the
entrance driveway, there is a one-storey commercial building (450
King Street) with surface parking to the front along King Street North
and with access from Blue Springs Drive.
South: across Blue Springs Drive, the subject site is faced by a 2-
storey parking structure lining the Blue Springs Drive that is
associated with the commercial building at the corner of Blue Springs
Drive and King Street (1 Blue Springs Drive), as well as the rear area
of a large format commercial building (24 Forwell Creek Road). To
the east of these properties the subject site is faced by a 3-storey
residential building at its southeast corner.
View of surrounding properties to the east, northwest/west and south of the subject site.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 12 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
5. Policy & Guideline Framework
Waterloo Official Plan
The subject site is designated “Open Space” in the Waterloo Official
Plan, however, the proposed Official Plan Amendment would
redesignate the site to “Mixed-Use High Density Residential” to
accommodate the proposed residential development. The Mixed-
Use High Density Residential designation is intended to provide
opportunities for significant levels of residential intensification, while
allowing for complementary and ancillary uses, to support major
nodes and corridors of Waterloo. The maximum height in the
designation is 81 metres (25-27 storeys generally).
The general urban design policies of Section 3.11.1 and the
additional design guidelines for nodes in Section 3.11.2 provide
direction for the development of the site. Generally, these policies
provide design direction on the follow topics for the subject site:
o Existing Features;
o Character;
o Compatibility of Form;
o Circulation and Connectivity;
o Building Massing;
o Building Design and Articulation;
o Parking;
o Landscape Design and Open Space;
o Transit-Oriented Design;
o Sustainable Design; and,
o Safety and Security.
Excerpt of land use plan (Schedule A) from the Waterloo Official Plan.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 13 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Waterloo Urban Design Manual
The Urban Design Manual implements the general policy direction of
the Official Plan. Portions of the general urban design guidelines of
Part 2 of the Waterloo Urban Design Manual and the supplemental
design guidelines of Part 3 are relevant to the subject site. The
following sections of these guidelines are particularly relevant to the
development form proposed for the subject site, recognizing the
preliminary design relates to the approvals process for an Official
Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment and that detailed
design has not been undertaken at this time:
o 2.1.1 Pedestrian-Friendly Design;
o 2.1.2 Human-Scale Development;
o 2.1.3 Compatible Development;
o 2.1.4 Safety and Security;
o 2.1.5 Transit-Oriented Design;
o 2.1.6 Building Design;
o 2.1.7 Amenity Areas;
o 2.1.8 Landscape Design;
o 2.2.1 Respect Existing Features + Conditions;
o 2.2.2 Views and Vistas;
o 2.3 Character;
o 2.3.2 Site Circulation;
o 2.5 Sustainable Design;
o 3.1.4 Tall Buildings; and,
o 3.2.1 Nodes and Corridors.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 14 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
6. Design Basis & Response
Existing Vegetation and Grading
The general vegetation overview for the site characterized the site
vegetation as mainly consisting of “low to intermediate quality,
primarily successional softwood and some hardwood species”.
Redevelopment of the site would be outside of the floodline of Four
Wells Lake, where much of the site’s existing vegetation is contained.
The landscape design at the time of detailed design presents
opportunities to provide complementary plantings near the water’s
edge to further naturalize this space, while adding plantings along
the site’s frontage and internal amenity areas to further the tree
canopy, while compensating for trees removed as part of the
development.
The proposed development mimics the overland flow patterns that
exists on the site, which either flows to Blue Springs Drive or Four
Wells Lake. Existing grades are matched at either the property line
or the limit of development to ensure that overall drainage patterns
are not impacted, and no disruption is caused to adjacent properties.
The proposed design reduces the imperviousness from that of the
current development, increasing the infiltration potential and
reducing the runoff volumes.
Most of existing vegetation and trees on the site surrounds the Four Wells Lake and boardwalk and will be maintained and enhanced where possible.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 15 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Character
The proposed design uses both site layout and
building design considerations to integrate with the
surrounding Willowells neigbourhood. The site is
laid out to pull the building towards the street and
strengthen the public street edge of Blue Springs
Drive, while providing for contributing open spaces
and plantings to building’s rear closest to the Four
Wells Lake edge, a defining character element of the
Willowells neighbourhood. The “hybrid” taller
building form allows for a meaningful intensification
of the site while provide a purposeful placement of
the building tower to maintain a sensitivity to the
surrounding built fabric. There is little in the
surrounding immediate context that provides a
cohesive and unifying architecture given the
diversity of form, nature, and construction age
surrounding the subject site, so the proposed design
seeks an urban, contemporary aesthetic for the
development through both form and materiality.
The proposed design employs a contemporary aesthetic borrowing solid, more traditional materials in a form that balances intensity with ground floor activation along
Blue Springs Drive.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 16 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
View of proposed building looking from the east side of Four Wells Lake.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 17 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Building Massing
The proposed design uses a defined 5-storey building base upon
which a 10-storey tower extends as the building middle and top to
establish a pedestrian scale along the public street frontage while
minimizing the visual mass of the upper storeys.
Building Base
The building base is comprised of both lower and upper portions in a
manner that is oriented to the southwest corner of the subject site to
achieve objectives of a pedestrian-scaled Blue Springs Drive
interface and an open relationship with the Four Well Lake.
The lower base consists of the 1st and 2nd floors. At-grade, the east-
west leg of the lower base along Blue Springs Drive is positioned with
generally between 5 to 7.5 metres from the right-of-way edge to
frame the public street, provide transition space to ground floor
townhouse units, and provide opportunities of porch projections (5.5
metres) and apartment entrance recession (7.5 metres). The north-
south leg of the lower base along the existing internal driveway varies
in setback owing to the angle of the proposed site boundary,
providing more space at the Blue Spring Drive corner (11 to 12
metres) and reducing moving northwards. To the rear of the building,
the building setbacks vary between 5 to 40 metres given the
proposed irregular property boundary and the proposed open
courtyard in this space.
The upper base consists of the 3rd through 5th floors, which is
comprised of two “wings” extending to the east and north from the
corner. The upper base storeys step back from the lower base with
generally between 7.5 to 8.7 metres in depth to provide a distinction
from the lower base, to reinforce that pedestrian-scale, and to
accommodate a transition into the tower.
Building Tower
The building tower rises through the 6th through 15th floors of the
building at the southwest corner to reinforce the public street and
maximize separation to surrounding buildings in the Willowells
neighbourhood. The tower features a slender floor plate
(approximately 775 square metres) that is square in shape to
minimize the tower’s visual mass and shadow impacts on
surrounding properties (see Appendix A for shadow impact
graphics). It sits atop on the upper base footprint with the stepbacks
established by that footprint as compared to the lower base that
reduce any impacts of wind down-washing at the ground.
A defined building composition is achieved through scaling of height for the lower base and significant stepbacks of the upper base and tower.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 18 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
The proposed design uses a building base that relates to the
height of surrounding buildings and purposeful tower positioning on the site to create a context-appropriate taller
building form to ensure compatibility.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 19 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Building Articulation & Materials
Building Base
The lower base contains three sections that taken together are
meant to provide a uniform aesthetic to the pedestrian priority zone
of the building elevations. The design of the east-west wing of the
building base containing townhouse units uses colour and material
changes with lighter concrete and darker brick; significant
proportions of glazed windows; recession of the front door entrances;
and, projections of stairs and balconies to establish a vertical rhythm
of articulation on individual units facing the street and internal areas
of the site. The apartment lobby at the corner of Blue Springs Drive
and the internal driveway to the west use a concrete base material
and a large bay of windows that extend to the height of the top of the
second storey to emphasize the entrance, together with a recession
of the building entrance from the principal wall plane to provide depth
and weather protection. A vertical line of brick materials ties in the
height of this entrance area with the height of the townhouse units to
the east. The exterior of the parking garage where it is not lined along
the north-south wing of the building base follows the general pattern
set by the townhouse elevations with a similar rhythm of bays,
material use, and fenestration (although not transparent) to provide
a visual continuity of the lower base aesthetic.
The wings of the upper base use a similar proportion and
composition to that of the lower base. Using a similar pattern of
windows, the upper base incorporates lighter yellow brick as a
distinction to the lower base, and a flatter, more uniform wall plane
as compared to the townhouse unit projections. Projecting balconies
for each individual unit provide depth and variety along the wall
elevations and glazed balcony railings provide a lightness to the
upper base.
Active at-grade uses and building articulation along the lower base together contribute to a pedestrian-focused ground floor walking environment.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 20 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
View of proposed building’s Blue Springs Drive face looking from the southeast.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 21 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Building Tower
The tower design carries upwards the general treatment of the upper
base elevations to unify the base and tower design. The lighter
yellow brick materials of the upper base are extended vertically in
sections as solid accents with a larger proportion of transparent glass
to emphasize a visual lightness to the tower mass. Glazed balcony
railings for balconies recessed within vertical extensions assist in
maintaining this lightness. At the rooftop, the mechanicals are
enclosed within a fully enclosed mechanical penthouse. A lighter line
of concrete material projects beyond the spandrel glazed walls of the
mechanical penthouse and runs vertically to the lower storeys to
provide a refined cap to the tower, in turn breaking up the length of
balconies along the building elevations.
The building tower articulation and detailing pulls from the upper base of the building.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 22 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Above: South building elevation facing Blue Springs Drive.
Above: North building elevation facing Four Wells Lake and/or internal courtyard open space.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 23 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Above: East building elevation facing Four Wells Lake and/or internal courtyard open space.
Above: West building elevation internal driveway and direction of King Street North.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 24 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Circulation, Connectivity and Transit-Oriented Design
Vehicle
The proposed site layout eliminates the existing two driveway
accesses from Blue Springs Drive, and consolidates vehicular
access to the site with the existing driveway access for 30 Blue
Springs Drive abutting the west side of the subject site. From this
driveway, entrances to the building are spaced as much as possible
with a vehicular entrance located close to the southwest corner of
the building providing access to a dedicated internal loading area,
and a second entrance close to the north side of the building
providing access to the parking garage for residents and visitors.
This access pattern limits any potential conflicts between drivers and
pedestrians, particularly with the removal of existing conflicts along
Blue Springs Drive.
Pedestrian
The proposed site layout positions and orients the building to frame
the Blue Springs Drive street edge and provide convenient and direct
connections to the public sidewalk, which leads directly to transit
services along King Street to the west and the trailway system to the
east. A wide walkway connection from the public sidewalk provides
a visually prominent access to the main apartment lobby entrance
near the southwest corner of the building. West of this entrance, each
of the townhouse units facing onto Blue Springs Drive have individual
walkways leading directly from their entrance to the public sidewalk.
The townhouse units on the non-facing east and north sides of the
building are connected to the public sidewalk by way of a walkway
lining the building edge with each townhouse unit having an
individual walkway access to this route. At the time of detailed
design, this more functional circulation can be complemented by
additional recreational circulation through the open courtyard space
to the north of the building and connecting to the existing boardwalk.
Multiple direct connections to the Blue Springs Drive public sidewalk with no driveway interruptions along the site’s frontage assist in creating a comfortable walking area.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 25 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Parking
The proposed design incorporates a total of 200 parking spaces
contained entirely within an integrated parking garage that includes
one underground level and three above-grade levels. The garage
includes a total of 5 barrier-free spaces in locations surrounding the
elevators on the underground level and the second floor.
Designated visitor parking could easily be located close to the
elevator shaft and stairwells as well. Most of the parking garage is
lined with active uses along its edges, most particularly where it
faces Blue Springs Drive and the internal courtyard open space.
`
An entirely integrated parking garage with active liner uses along its most publicly visible frontages (left for underground level, right for ground level)
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 26 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Landscape Design, Amenities and Open Space
The proposed site layout accommodates three key focal points for
landscaping efforts and usable open space to create a series of
engaging and inviting spaces for building residents and visitors.
An at-grade outdoor courtyard space is bounded generally by the two
wings of the building and provides the opportunities to create an
engaging space that ties the building edge to the water’s edge. This
courtyard provides a substantial consolidated space, lined by active
residential space for natural surveillance purposes, that would allow
for a diversity of landscape elements. A more formalized hardscaped
sitting area extending from the building can be complemented by a
combination of tree plantings (deciduous and coniferous), mass
planting beds and planters to accentuate and break up the space.
Walkways permeating the space could lead between the building
entrances and the existing boardwalk, the latter near the water’s
edge which could be complemented enhancement and naturalization
plantings.
Rooftop amenity areas in the building base provide opportunities for
communal amenity space as well as private, individual amenity
spaces for some units. On the 6th floor, a sizable communal terrace
presents an opportunity to create formal and informal sitting and
dining areas principally with a hard surface treatment but
complemented with soft landscape treatments through raised
massed planted beds or planters including deciduous canopy trees.
An indoor amenity area on the 6th floor leads into this space and
provides a seam between indoor and outdoor amenities.
Individual unit terraces for units on the 3rd floor would be expected to
be principally hardscaped with added subtle planting accents,
together with privacy screens to provide a boundary between the
individual private terraces. The balance of the rooftop is identified are
planted green roofs, the specifics of which are subject to detailed
design.
The space created between the building edge and street edge by the
building positioning along Blue Springs Drive will serve two
purposes. It provides spaces for a regular rhythm of deciduous tree
plantings (on either public or private side of the sidewalk) spaced to
create a canopy over the sidewalk to formalize the streetscape edge
of the site’s frontage. It also provides sufficient space for plantings
and landscape elements for landscaped “forecourts” or “front yards”
to the townhouse units lining the building edge, contributing to the
streetscape aesthetic while delineating and defining the public and
private boundaries.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 27 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
Sustainable Design
The proposed development inherently incorporates elements of
sustainability owing to its location and context. The proposed
development represents a compact and efficient mixed-residential
building that forms part of a broader mixed-use community
containing mix of residential, commercial, employment, and
recreation uses. The site is well-served by existing local transit routes
on King Street North and is a short distance to the ION Conestoga
Station. There is a connected system of sidewalks and trails
surrounding the site that support active transportation options for
residents and visitors. All of this provides opportunities for car-free
and car-reduced living opportunities for residents.
Many sustainability elements can be achieved through the detailed
design stage for the proposed development. The following
sustainability elements are demonstrated in the preliminary design
or are reasonably possible:
o Building orientation: the building is positioned with a
significant amount of southerly exposure to allow for passive
solar gain, with generous amounts of transparent glazing to
accommodate solar gain.
o Green roofs: the preliminary design shows significant portions
of the 6th floor rooftop as green roofs, providing a positive
contribution to reducing heat island effects.
o Infiltration: the proposed redevelopment and design has the
potential of decreasing the amount of existing non-permeable
surfaces and reducing run-off volumes from the site.
o Garbage/Recycling: internal garbage area typically include a
system of collection and sorting for garbage, recyclables, and
organic waste. Furthermore, opportunities for waste
management at the time of construction planning can be
considered and optimized wherever possible.
o Materials: the use of local manufacturers or suppliers for
durable construction materials, particularly renewable
materials and recycled materials, and those that eliminate or
minimize effects on indoor air quality through emissions (low
VOC-emitting materials) should be preferred.
o Indoor water conservation measures: indoor water design
measures will satisfy the Ontario Building Code in terms of
water efficiency and the use of water efficient fixtures for the
building, such as low-flush and/or dual-flush toilets.
o Outdoor water conservation measures: planting plans can
emphasize the use of native and drought-tolerant species to
ensure minimal irrigation requirements for the open areas
provided through the site.
o Energy efficiency and conservation measures: the building
design will satisfy the Ontario Building Code in terms of energy
efficiency and conservation, with such elements as effective
thermal resistance of doors and windows; centralized HVAC
system with programmable thermostats; and, programmable
and/or censored lighting controls.
o Transportation demand management (TDM) measures:
implementation of a TDM program can be implemented for the
development to reduce the reliance on the automobile for
travel, including such measures as designated carshare or
electric vehicle spaces or secure bicycle parking facilities.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 28 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
7. Conclusions
The proposed development provides a design that appropriately
responds to the surrounding neighbourhood context and the
applicable design policy and guidelines direction from the City of
Waterloo. Particularly, the design:
o Establishes a context-appropriate, hybrid building form that
uses heights and stepbacks on the lower floors to establish a
defined building base that references the surrounding building
fabric in the area;
o Positions the building on the site to provide a strong building
edge to Blue Springs Drive, with active at-grade uses on the
facing ground floor, complementary streetscape plantings in
front of the building, and an architectural approach that
provides interaction between the building and public sidewalk;
o Provides an appropriate interface to the surrounding low and
mid-rise buildings to the northwest, east, and southeast with
the tower portion strategically positioned to maximize spacing;
o Uses a slender tower portion that minimizes potential impacts
related to shadow, wind, and building mass on surrounding
properties and the public streetscape;
o Provides an attractive, varied, and distinct contemporary
architectural finish that takes material cues from the
surrounding area and provides a positive image for
redevelopment of the site; and,
o Complements the built form with an at-grade open space that
blends the building with the edge of Four Wells Lake, and that
is complemented by a series of rooftop amenity areas for
resident enjoyment of the surrounding natural interface.
Urban Design Brief | 40 Blue Springs Drive 29 GSP Group with ABA Architects | December 2017
APPENDIX A
Shadow Impact Graphics