urban area mosquito control: results of two experiments dr. grayson c. brown public health...
DESCRIPTION
Most homeowners are skeptical that PMPs can provide real mosquito control at the spatial scale of an individual back yard Performance data with modern pyrethroids has been lacking in actual suburban environments.TRANSCRIPT
Urban Area Mosquito Control: Results of Two Experiments
Dr. Grayson C. BrownPublic Health Entomology Laboratory
Department of EntomologyUniversity of KentuckyLexington, KY 40546
Residual Adulticides for Residential Mosquito Suppression
Most homeowners are skeptical that PMPs can provide real mosquito control at the spatial scale of an
individual back yard
Performance data with modern pyrethroids has been lacking in actual suburban
environments.
We studied this technique
Study involved two principal experiments
Will summarize results here
More detail in the May, 2005 and August, 2006 issues of PCT magazine.
Study conducted at 24 residences in Lexington, KY
Median assessed value: $185,750
2004 Lexington, KY median value: $143,100
Average age: 43.4 years
Average lot size: 0.31 A
Treatments applied with a backpack mist blower
Applications made by a certified PMP (Charlie Asbury or Scott Quinton both from All-Rite Pest Control, Lexington)
Objective is to treat mosquito adults’ daytime resting sites
Treat vegetation near home perimeter
Treat vegetation in the yard
Treat vegetation on the perimeter
First Experiment Treatment Specifications
Treatment Water Placebo
Demand®CSSyngenta
TalstarOne™FMC
A. I. Water Lambda-cyhalothrin Bifenthrin
App. Rate --- 0.8 fl. Oz/ gallon 1.0 fl. Oz/gallon
Flow Rate: 14 oz/min (“3”)
Droplet size: 50µ VMD
Avg of 21 minutes a Home
Avg of 6.5 Gallons/Home, or ca. 3.3 gal/1,000 sq. ft treated
Mosquito Monitoring
• Sampled mosquitoes in backyards weekly for 10 weeks (-2…8)
• All sampling after 6 pm
• Mosquito Surveillance– CDC Traps– Human Landing Rate– Gravid Traps– Ovitrap– Sweepnet
Two Mosquito Genera Dominate in Most Kentucky SuburbsAedes Culex
Cause majority of bites to humans
Hide in bushes during day
Many species are primarily nuisance
Mainly bites birds
Hide in tree canopies during day
Primary vectors of WNV, et al.
Human Landing Rate
0
2
4
6
8
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Weeks Post Treatment
Mos
quito
Bite
s/10
min
Demand CS TalstarOne Water Placebo
85% reduction after 1 week
73% reduction over 6 weeks
98% Aedes
98% Aedes species
Homeowner experienceHomeowners kept a “diary”
• 1 = We did not notice any mosquitoes.
• 2 = We noticed or were bitten by mosquitoes, but not enough to use repellents or avoid being outdoors.
• 3 = At least some of us were bothered enough by mosquitoes to use repellents or avoid being outdoors.
• 4 = Mosquitoes were very noticeable and were a definite annoyance for most of the week.
• 5 = Mosquitoes were very bad the entire week.
• NA = I was out of town.”
Homeowner ExperienceAverage Homeowner diary rating
1
2
3
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Weeks Post Treatment
Ave
rage
Dia
ry R
atin
g
Demand CS TalstarOne Water Placebo
Avoided outdoors
Did NOT avoid outdoors
Gravid Traps
0
15
30
45
60
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Weeks Post Treatment
Mos
quito
es/T
rap/
Nig
ht
Demand CS TalstarOne Water Placebo
No Effect
96% Culex (A Principal WNV vector)
96% Culex
Conclusions from this Expt• Mosquito bites were
reduced by 75 – 85% for 6 weeks.
• Degree of control was noticeable by homeowners.
• Nuisance species were controlled but some primary disease vectors were not.
Why the difference between Aedes & Culex?
Insecticide layer & Aedes resting sites
Culex resting sites
8 – 10 feet
Next Questions
• If product could get into the tree canopy, could the Culex disease vectors be controlled in the spatial scale of the residential backyard?
• How sensitive is the method with respect to thoroughness of the coverage?
Launching insecticide into the trees will create chemical trespass problems
Would the treatment be effective against Culex if we could get it up there?
Treated tree lines with Demand
Eight Blocks, each had 100’ lengths with 100’ untreated borders
Used Demand at max label rate and compared to a water control
Height maxed at 25 – 30’
Sampled mosquitoes near ground and at 25’ above ground
Lifted the trap into the tree canopy
Putting it in the canopy locates it close to the Culex mosquitoes
In addition, another CDC trap was mounted at the standard height near the ground
Finally, a Gravid Trap (not shown) was also placed on the ground – These trap females that have already had a blood meal and are looking for a place to lay eggs.
20 –
25
feet
Results?
Canopy: 89% Reduction,
98% Culex
Ground: 58% Reduction,
94% Aedes
Then tried this technique at 24 residential properties in Lexington
Tested 2 techniques against water: Quick/Fast vs. Thorough (including tree canopies).
Treatment Specs Compared Application Technique With Demand CS
Treatment Rate Product Cost Time
Water 0 0 10 min
Quick/Cheap 3.2 g/home $5 - 10 10 min
Slow/Thorough 6.5 g/home $10 – 20 20 min
Results – Mosquito reduction compared with control (2wk post treatment)
Quick Thorough, includes tree spraying
Aedes (Responsible for most bites)
33% 82%
Culex (Primary WNV vector) 0% 85%
Method
Mosquito
CDC Ground Trap Catch
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4
Weeks Post Treatment
% S
upre
ssio
n
Thorough Quick
Culex were suppressed in both tree traps and gravid traps
0
100
200
300
400
Cul
ex/tr
ap/n
iight
Tree GravidTrap Type
ControlQuickThorough
Homeowner Opinion After One Month
0
20
40
60
80
100
% S
atis
fact
ion
Throrough Quick Water
Do you believe that the treatment reduced mosquito populations to your satisfaction?
Homeowners spent more time in their backyards
0
20
40
60
80
100
% m
ore
time
spen
t in
back
yard
Thorough Quick WaterPlacebo
75%
27%
Survey taken 4 weeks post treatment
75%
Conclusions
• Culex can be suppressed if the product can get into the tree canopy.
• Thorough coverage with significant volume is critical to suppression of all mosquito species.
• In this study, homeowner satisfaction was NOT a good indicator of mosquito suppression.
Lessons
• Understanding vector behavior is crucial to the success of barrier applications.
• In many situations, “mosquitoes” are a mixture of many species, each with its own behavioral characteristics.
• A treatment that reduces mosquito bites will not necessarily reduce disease risk.