updated experience of a needle-syringe exchange program neps in malmö, sweden
DESCRIPTION
Updated Experience of a Needle-Syringe Exchange Program NEPs in Malmö, Sweden. Marianne Alanko, Vilma Molnegren, Per Björkman, Anders Widell Departments of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases University Hospital of Malmö, Sweden. The NEPs in Sweden. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Updated Experience of a Needle-Syringe Exchange Program NEPs in Malmö,
Sweden
Marianne Alanko, Vilma Molnegren, Per Björkman,
Anders WidellDepartments of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious
Diseases University Hospital of Malmö, Sweden
The NEPs in SwedenNEP = Needle (and syringe) Exchange
ProgrammeFree exchange of used injection gear against
similar number of CLEAN needles /syringes) to reduce circulation time of infected gear
IVDU = Intravenous Drug User
Lund NEP started in 1986, local initiative to prevent HIV spread
Malmö started 1987, 6 mo later, also local initiative
Other projects started, but discontinued by 1989
The NEPs in Sweden Major criticism and concern from “official
Sweden” Both Malmö and Lund projects were
reluctantly allowed on a trial evaluation project basis
In the outside World NEPs rapidly became one cornerstone in HIV prevention
In 2007 Swedish government decided to transfer NEP permissions to local counties – so far limited response, except Helsingborg 2010, Kristianstad 2011?
Probably Stockholm will follow, in a limited way
Physical features of NEPs
Offer free needles and syringes, under exchange format – leading to less reuse, shorter circulation
Offer regular testing Provide a non criminalizing environment
which the IVDU can and will return to A platform for vaccination against HAV, HBV
First, HIV prevention but also against blood borne viruses – and bacteria
And sexually transmitted diseases/ free condoms
Build Mental barriers against infection risks
Provide Correct and updated knowledge of the IVDU´s own infection status
Health education Close contacts Leaflets, Films Interviews for new trends and habits
Prevention against Overdose - the ultimate harm – and its management
Motivate for Methadone and Sobutex mainenance therapy participation
So what are the potentials of NEPs?
Beyond direct prevention – be prospective sampling platforms for unique, biological materials covering both incident and chronic infections.
Independent on clinical disease Understanding transmission patterns -
phylogeny Test for “new” infections in high risk groups This should lead to improved NEPs The ultimate goals remain
long term drug freedom after detoxification if impossible, maintenance methadone therapy treatment of acquired infections Return to more normal life
The Malmö NEP
Malmö280000 inhabitants, presumably 1000-1500
IVDUs
Malmö NEPRequirements: participants > 20years and signs
of ongoing injection >6000 participants since start in 1987
Goal: Blood sampling every 3 months, sera tested for anti-HIV, HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti HCV
Sere then biobanked, traceable by Swedish 10-digit personal numbers
Next visits, retest on sero-negative markers
First Malmö NEP study 1990-1993 (Månsson, Widell, SCJID, 2000) The whole cohort was studied by
serological markers (anti-HIV, HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HCV
Number of patients= 515 Results
Low baseline prev of HIV, high of HBV and highest of HCV
No new HIV cases in cohort spanning 4 years
High incidences of HBV (11.7/100 /pyr) High incidence of HCV (26.3/100 pyr)
Conclusions of first NEP study 1990-1993 (Månsson, Widell, SCJID, 2000)
HIV did not spread – like in Stockholm But background prevalence was low
HBV incidence was high – but could subsequently be influenced by vaccination
HCV incidence even higher – with no vaccine available – HCV incidence reflects “leakage” in NEP
HCV good surrogate marker in non exposed, but 60 % already exposed
NEPs can be improved
Second study, 1997-2005, focusing on the freshly recruited IVDUs (Alanko, JVH, 2010)Serology supported by Nucleic Acid Testing on HCV
New participants 1997-2005
N=1661
Without ID-numberN=454
With ID-number1207
Cohort for follow-upN=832
One blood sample only
N=351
No blood samples within
NEPN=24
1997-2005 study, baseline virus prevalence in subset providing one blood sample only (MA)
One blood sample only
N=351
HIV2 (0.6%) A-HIV+
HBV144 (41.0%) A-HBc
+
HCV258 (73.7%) A-
HCV+
1997-2005 study, baseline virus prevalence in IVDU cohort providing >2 blood samples (MA)
Cohort for follow-upN=832
HIV1 (0.12%) A-
HIV+
HBV236 (28.4%) A-
HBc +
HCV500 (60.1%) A-
HCV+
Incidence – normalized to new suceptible cases per 100 person years
Number of
susceptibles
Number of
seroconversions
Years at
risk
Seroconversions
/100 pyr
Compared to
1990–1993**
HIV 830 2 2433 0.08 0.00
HBV 588 39 1160 3.4 11.7
HCV 332 186 486 38.3 (31.5*) 26.3
*) Månsson et al, Scand J Infect Dis 32: 253-258, 2000
HBV and vaccination in 1997-2005 In the longitudinal cohort, 588 persons were
susceptible to HBV at entry. 351 (60%) received at least three doses of vaccine,
and protective levels of anti-HBs were achieved in 321 (91%).
HBV infection occurred in 39 participants (21 with documented HBsAg and anti-HBc, 18 with anti-HBc only) in a median interval between NEP enrolment and anti-HBc seroconversion was 17
HBV incidence and vaccination
Nineteen (48%) of the 39 incident HBV cases had begun vaccination; 11 had obtained only one dose and two had received two.
Six of the subjects with incident HBV were fully vaccinated (3 doses) but had never achieved anti-HBs > 10mIU/mL.
No incident case of HBV occurred in vaccine responders.
Five of the incident HBV cases developed chronic HBV infection.
The rest of this presentation will focus on HCV, as mentioned our best surrogate marker for NEP ”leakage”
Starting with baseline risk factors….
Confounder of HCV incidence in the NEP – IVDUs in HCV window phase when enrolling?
HCV RNA PCR (Roche Taqman) revealed viremia in 67 of the last anti-HCV negative blood samples.
37 participants had registered in the window phase (> women).
Adjusted incidence 31.5/100 pyr (compared to 38/100 pyr by antibody detection)
Tid till HCV smitta - år - spss6,004,002,000,00
Fre
qu
en
cy
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Inte v iremi
Viremi i A-HCV negativt prov senare
Viremi vid inträdet
Viremi
Time in NEP (years)
Viremia in anti-HCV negative sample at NEP enrolmentViremia in anti-HCV negative sample within NEPNo detectable viremia in anti-HCV negative sample
Number ofpersons
Figure 1. Detectable HCVviremia in last anti-HCV negative sample in 186 incident HCV infections
Tid i sprb eller tid till smitta - upp till 12 månader12,0010,008,006,004,002,000,00
Cu
m S
urv
iva
l
1,0
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,0
03-05-censored00-02-censored97-99-censored
03-0500-0297-99
Årsgrupp
Survival Functions
Time to HCV or time in NEP
Survival functions
Year of registration in NEP
Cum
Surv
ival
Fra
ctio
n of
ant
i-HC
V n
egat
ive
IDU
s
Months
No improvement in HCV incidence from 1997-2005
Quantitative retrospective HCV RNA testing in 198 seroconverters Roche Ampliprep/Taqman quantitative RNA assay Dynamic range: 15 IU/ml - 69 million IU/mlNormal test volume: 1 ml of plasma.We used 100 µl of biobanked IVDU serum diluted with 900 µl anti-HCV neg serumThus a lower linear detection limit < 150 IU/ml
The last anti-HCV negative serum,The first anti-HCV positive serum,
Span between samples normally 3-6 months,
A serum drawn approximately 1 year later
Ongoing specifically biobank related work This prospectively collected serum
biobank of silently seroconverting IVDUs is valuable for further studies, like Viral genotype, NS5B phylogenetics including
Baysian Mixed HCV genotype infection - Luminex Neutralization (HCVpp, HCVcc) Other viruses HTLV, Parv4, XMRV, HEV?? Bringing the NEP biobank studies from
retrospective risk analysis into truly PROSPECTIVE
And remember – we have patients PIN
Crash plan for incident HCV
Prospective, early identification of incident HCV HCV Ag on anti-HCV negative NEP participants HCV RNA and phylogenetic analysis Questionnaire at each sampling Deep interview early in each incident case “Recover Black
Box” Deepen our understanding how much paraphernalia
(utensils beyond needles and syringes) contribute to transmission.
Optimal needle/syringe coverage – opening times If noting is done, vulnerability for HIV remains
Summary – our overall NEP goals for NEP partipants
Survival Stop further transmission of HIV and
other viruses Initiate long term drug freedom after
detoxification If impossible, transfer to maintenance
methadone therapy Offer treatment of acquired infectionsMake a return to more normal
life/family/work possible
And for HCV specifically
Study the natural course of infection in our NEP participants acquiring HCV since 90% of incident HCV infections are subclinical and acute “icteric, clinical hepatitis C may not be representative for the overall pattern in hepatitis C
Whatever pattern that leads to chronic viremia – these are the patients who will be the bulk of our patients
Thank You