update on multi-pollutant legislation richard long, region 8 wrap meeting nov. 14, 2001
TRANSCRIPT
Update on Multi-pollutant Legislation
Richard Long, Region 8
Wrap Meeting Nov. 14, 2001
Testimony on S.556 Jeffords Bill
Nov. 1 testimony by Jeff Holmstead before senate environment and public works committee
S.556 – Jeffords bill S.5656 addresses power plant emissions of SO2, Nox,
mercury, and CO2 Requires cap and trade program while also requiring
controls on specific power plants more than 30 years old
Administration Reaction
Supports developing new approach to controlling emissions from power sector
CO2 should be addresses by Cabinet level working group rather than in CAA CO2 controls – big shift to natural gas
Controls on specific plants problematic for trading program
Administration Reaction (con’t)
Short lead time for 90% mercury reduction Potential increases in electricity rates Lacks integration with CAA programs
(including Nox SIP call and WRAP strategy) Lacks allocation scheme
EPA supports a 3-Pollutant Approach
Administration developing 3-pollutant proposal (excluding CO2)
Guiding Principles Increase energy supplies Protect environment Preserve energy diversity (including use of clean
coal) and energy reliability Improve efficiency of power industry
Benefits of 3-pollutant Approach
Provide significant emission reductions using cost effective market cap and trade system
Reduce numerous effects on health and environment Fine PM Ground level ozone Mercury deposition to water Regional haze Acid deposition Nitrogen deposition to water bodies
Benefits (con’t)
Ensure accountability for reductions Coordinate utility compliance with multiple
clean air programs Provide certainty and flexibility for industry Ease burden on States
Summary
Support for new approach for power sector emissions
Concerns on provisions of existing proposals Administration still developing 3P bill Look forward to future hearings to discuss details Continue working with Congress and stakeholders
on this important issue