update on dual antiplatelet therapy cme/brochure… · dual antiplatelet therapy...
TRANSCRIPT
Update on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
Brian J. Corbett DO Assistant Professor of Medicine Cooper
Medical School of Rowan University
Disclosures
• None
Questions????????
• Which combination of DAPT?
• Optimal Duration of DAPT?
• Warfarin/NOAC Therapy?
Platelet inhibition represents the cornerstone of cardiovascular therapy…
CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE – KARDIOVASKULÄRE MEDIZIN – MÉDECINE CARDIOVASCULAIRE 2017;20(7–8):169–175
DAPT: Oral Agents Acetylsalicy
lic acid (ASA)
Ticlopidine hydrochloride
Clopidogrel bisulfate
Prasugrel hydrochloride
Ticagrelor
Trade Name Aspirin1-3 Ticlid®4 Plavix®5 Effient®6 Brilinta®7
Class Salicylate P2Y12 Receptor
Antagonist
P2Y12 Receptor
Antagonist
P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist
P2Y12 Receptor
Antagonist
Formulation Active Drug Active Drug Pro-Drug Pro-Drug Active Drug
Maintenance Dose
75-325 mg daily*
250 mg BID 75 mg daily 10 mg daily 90 mg BID
Reversible No No No No Yes
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2008;10(suppl_I):I8-I13. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/sun041
Clopidogrel
Less Bleeding Less Cost
Ischemia
Why is DAPT so important ?
• Protect the stented vascular segment from the development of stent thrombosis while vascular healing and progressive strut endotheliazation – in-hospital mortality rate of 5% to 10% – 30-day mortality rate of 10% to 25%
JAMA. 2005;293:2126-2130
Stent Implantation
Endothelial Denudation Medial Dissection Exposure of sub-intimal components Thrombogenecity of metal
Activation of platelets
Thrombosis
Reaction to stent struts (Macrophages and Giant Cells)
Production of: Cytokines Mitogens Chemotaxic factors
Activation of vascular smooth muscle cells
Proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells
Restenosis
Stent thrombosis rates reduced with better technique and DAPT…
1. Schatz et al.Circulation. 1991;83:148;2. Fischman et al. N Engl J Med. 1994;331496; 3. Colombo et al. Circulation.1995;91:1676 4. Schomig et al. Circulation. 1994,90:2716; 5. Leon et al. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1665; 6. Joner et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:193.
Independent Risk Factors for ST
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009;53;1399-1409
DAPT
Interindividual variability in platelet response to clopidogrel after stenting
Michelle O’Donoghue, and Stephen D. Wiviott Circulation. 2006;114:e600-e606
Source: Wiviott SD et al. NEJM 2007;357:2001-2015
Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel (TRITON-TIMI 38)
0
5
9
60 90 180 270 360 450
HR 0.81, P=0.0004
Prasugrel
Clopidogrel
HR 0.80 P=.001
HR 0.77 P=.001
Days
CV
deat
h, M
I, or
str
oke
% 12.1
9.9 Bleeding Events
C (%) P (%) P-value TIMI major 1.8 2.4 .03 Life threatening 0.9 1.4 .01 Nonfatal 0.9 1.1 .23 Fatal 0.1 0.4 .002 ICH 0.3 0.3 .74
13,608 patients with high-risk ACS scheduled for PCI randomized to clopidogrel (300 mg LD and 75 mg MD) or prasugrel (60 mg LD and 10 mg
MD) for a median of 12 months
7
11
ACS=Acute coronary syndrome, ICH=Intracranial hemorrhage, LD=Loading dose, MD=Maintenance dose
0 30
Prasugrel reduces ischemic events with a higher rate of bleeding
Net Clinical Benefit Bleeding Risk Subgroups
0.5 1 2
Prior Stroke / TIA
Age > 75
Wgt < 60 kg
Rel Risk
+37%
-1%
+3%
Prasugrell Better Clopidogrell Better
HR
Pint = 0.006
Pint = 0.18
Pint = 0.36
PLATO: Primary Efficacy Endpoint
Days
9.8% 11.7%
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
%
No. at risk
Clopidogrel Ticagrelor
9,291 9,333
8,521 8,628
8,362 8,460
8,124 6,743 6,743
5,096 5,161
4,047 4,147 8,219
HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.77–0.92)
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor
p=0.0003
Wallentin L: NEJM 2009; 361:1045-57
CV death, MI or stroke
N=18,624
Time to major bleeding – primary safety event
No. at risk
Clopidogrel Ticagrelor
9,186 9,235
7,305 7,246
6,930 6,826
6,670
Days from first IP dose
5,209 5,129
3,841 3,783
3,479 3,433
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
10
5
0
15
Clopidogrel
Ticagrelor 11.20 11.58
6,545
HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.95–1.13), p=0.434
K-M
est
imat
ed ra
te (%
per
yea
r)
Wallentin L: NEJM 2009; 361:1045-57
All patients Ticagrelor (n=6,732)
Clopidogrel (n=6,676) p value*
Dyspnea, %
Any dyspneaç event
Requiring discontinuation of study-
treatment
15.4 0.9
10.4 0.3
<0.0001 < 0.0001
Dyspnea
Specific P2Y12 Inhibitors: Recommendations
Clopidogrel Prasugrel Ticagrelor Cangrelor
Route Oral Oral Oral IV
Onest 120 – 360 min 60 min 30 min 2 min
Offset 5 days 7 days 5 days 60 min
Reversible No No Yes Yes
Platelet Inhibition
20 – 60% 60 – 80% 70 – 95% 95%
Dosing for PCI LD: 600 mg MD 75 mg
LD 60 mg MD 10 mg
LD 180 mg MD 90 mg BID
LD 3 mcg/kg MD 4 mcg/kg/min
Dosing for Bridging
LD none MD 0.75 mcg/kg/min
Duration of therapy still unclear?
Eliano Pio Navarese et al. BMJ 2015;350:bmj.h1618
No significant differences in all cause mortality between short term and 12 month dual antiplatelet therapy
Longer Duration: DAPT Trial
• 9961 patients • international, multicenter, randomized, placebo-
controlled trial
Mauri LM, et al. NEJM 2014;371:2155-66.
Myocardial infarction that was not related to stent thrombosis (P<0.001) accounted for 55% of the treatment benefit.
Long DAPT after drug-eluting stent reduced the risks of stent thrombosis and MACE and cerebrovascular events but…
Mauri LM et al NEJM 2014;371:2155-66
Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary
Intervention.
JAMA. 2016;315(16):1735-1749
Q1 = Score -2 to 0 Q3 = Score Q2 = Score 1 Q4 = Score > 2
JAMA. 2016;315(16):1735-1749
Optimal DAPT duration after PCI differs according to clinical presentation
GW Stone et al. European Heart Journal (2017) 0, 1–10
So how do we decide?
Circulation. 2016;133:000–000
So how do we decide?
Circulation. 2016;133:000–000
What has really changed?
European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (2015) 1, 191–197