up pollution control board, lucknow - inspection report of stps … · 2016-04-13 · • to...

Inspection report

of STPs in Agra with reference to Hon'ble NGT Court Order dated 09.12.2015 in the matter of 0.A. No. 145 of 2015, D.K. Joshi Vs Union of India & Others

The Hon'ble National Green Tribunal passed the order in Original Application No. 145 of

2015, D.K . Joshi Vs Union of India & Others on dated 09.12.2015 that " ... We direct the Joint

inspection team of CPCB and representative of MoEF&CC and UPPCB to inspect the STPs and

submit a complete and comprehensive report on the operation and maintenance of the plant. They

shall collect effluent of the input as well as the output, analysis the same and submit the report

both in comparison to earlier standards as well as current standards. We make it clear that it will

be stated whether STPs have capacity to treat the Coliform Fecal or otherwise.

Report be categorically deal with the situat ion whether sewer connection when provided,

whether the plants would be in a position to handle the quantum of sewage and waste ... "

In compliance of above said Hon'ble NGT order; joint inspection team comprises of CPCB,

MoEF&CC & UPPCB has been formed with following Officers:

1. Dr. A.K. Gupta, Scientist-D, MoEF&CC, Regional Office Lucknow

2. Shri Kamal Kumar, Scientist-C, CPCB, Project Oftiee, Agra

3. Sbri Niranjan Sharma, Regional Officer (fie), UPPCB. Agra

The alwve joint committee visited the Buri Ka Nagla, Mau Road and Jaganpur, dayalbagh ,

agra STPs sites and collected the samples on dated 14.01.2016. During inspection following

observations has been made: -

L 2.2~MLD STP, Buri Ka Nagla, Mau Road, Agra:

TP working on oxidation pond/waste stablisation pond technology and found operational

during site visit. The STP is consist of uni ts as sump, screen, gr it chamber and three nos. of

setlling tank in two series (06 nos.) of setlling tanks (photo-A). There are following di crepancies

has been not.iced:

• lt has been found that there is no measuring device (flow meter, V-shaped Notch etc.), at

inlet and outlet to measure the quantity of effluent passes, was installed. The inlet screen

was found partially functional.

• The ~rcated effluent from oxidation/ waste stabl isation pond is being discharge directly to

river Y<1muna (photo-8).

Inspection report ofSTP's in ABra (0.A. No. 145 of2015) Page I of3

I

• It has been found that few quantity of overflow untreated sewage is being also discharge

directly to river Yamuna (photo-C).

• It has been found that installed enclosed type DG set (62.5KVA) is not 111 working

condition.

• It has been found that there is no fecal coliform treatment facility avaialble at Buri ka

Nagla STP.

• UPPCB, Lucknow has also rejected their application for consent to operate (CTO) under

the Water (pollution prevention & control) Act 1974, on dated 15.01.2016. (copy

enclosed as annexure-[)

• During the inspection samples of inlet and outlet discharged were also collected as per

the norms of CPCB and sealed in presence of Project Manager, Yamuna Pollution

Control Unit, UP Jal Nigam, Agra (photo-D). The collected samples were analysed in

laboratory of CPCB, Zonal Office, Lucknow.

• The analysis reports of outlet of Budhi ka Nagla STP effluent is enclosed as table- I. (as

annexure-II). Analysis results were also comapred with the General Standard for

discharge of Environmental Pollution Part-A (Exiting standrad, copy enclosed as

annexure-III) and new Standard (draft Notification dated: 24.11.2015, time frame for

implementation, copy enclosed as annexure-[V) for STPs. Analysis reports depcited that

values of parameters including pH, TS , NH4-N, N-total and P04-P are well within the

exiting standard limit, however, values of BOD and COD are above the prescribed limit.

• However, in comparision with new stanadrd, only values of pH is within the limit,

whereas, parameeters including TSS, NH4-N, N-total, P04-P, BOD, COD and Fecal

coliform are above the new standard limit.

2. 14.0MLD Jaganpur STP, Dayalbagh, Agra:

The above STP working on UASB (Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket) technology

and found operational. The STP having primary treatment (inlet chamber, mannual screen,

grit chamber), two UASB reactor (07MLD each), distribution box (04 nos.), s ludge sump,

filtrete sump, sludge drying bets (14 nos.), gas holder etc. (photo-E). There are following

discrepancies has been noticed:

• It has been found that there is no measuring device (flow meter, V-shaped Notch etc.), at

inlet and outlet to measure the quantity of effluent pasess, was installed.

• It has been found that treated effluent is also going direclty to river Yamuna (photo-F).

• ft has been found that installed enclosed type DG set (62.5KVA) is in working condition.

lnspecuon report of STP's in Agra (0.A. No. 145of2015)

Page2of3

• To minimize the fecal coliform population in the waste water, chlorine dosing has been

in practiced. It was noticed that the chlorine dosing system was not working at the time

of inspection (photo-G).

• UPPCB, Lucknow also rejected their consent to operate (CTO) under the Water

(pollution prevention & control) Act 1974, on dated 18.12.2015. (copy enclosed as

annexure-V)

• During the inspection samples of inlet and outlet discharged was also collected as per the

norms of CPCB and sealed in presence of Project Manager, Yamuna Pollution Control

Unit, UP Jal Nigarn, Agra (photo-H). The collected samples were analysed in laboratory

of CPCB, Zonal Office, Lucknow.

• The analysis reports of outlet of Jaganpur STP effluent is enclosed as table-2. (as

annexure-II). Analysis results were also comapred with the General Standard for

discharge of Environmental Pollution Part-A (Exiting standrad, copy enclosed as

annexure-lII) and new Standard (draft otification dated: 24.11.2015, time frame for

implementation, copy enclosed as annexure-JV) for STPs. Analysis reports depcited that

values of parameters including pH, TSS, H4-N, N-total and P04-P are well within the

exiting standard limit, however, values of BOD and COD are above the prescribed limit.

• However, in. comparision with new stanadrd, only values of pH is within the limit,

whereas, parameeters including TSS, NH4-N, N-total, P04-P, BOD, COD and Fecal

coliform (MPN/lOOml) are above the new standard limit.

3. Hon ' ble NGT also directed to joint team to submit "report on situation wheather sewage

connection when provided, whether the plants would be in a position to handle the quantum of

sewage and waste". In this connection In-charge, UPPCB, RO, Agra requested to Municipal

Commissioner, Agra Nagar Nigam, Agra and Project Manager, Yamuna Pollution Control

Unit, UP Jal Nigam, Agra to provide related information to the joint inspection committee.

(Copy of letter enclosed as annexure-Vl)

11;~

(D K. Gupta) Scien D, MoEF&CC

Regional Office, Lucla1ow

(Nira~ma) Regional Officer (lie)

U.P. Pollution Control Board, Agra

Inspection report ofSTP's in Agra (0.A. No. 145 of2015)

°""' °""' ~ (Kamal Kumar) Scientist-C

Central Pollution Control Board, Project Office, Agra

Page3 of3

I

PHOTO-A

PHOTO-B

Page 1 of 4

PHOTO-C

PHOT0-0

Page 2 of4

PHOTO-E

PHOTO-F

Page 3 of 4

I

PHOTO-G

PHOTO-H

Page 4 of 4

~:

• I

· I

BO -qo q crq o I ~?fUf ~~, trm-12 m, fcrrfcr ~ .

1'rr=rffi ~. c1,@ 10i

I _ 1 ·,_ ':1 1 l/) «. -"'.:> ,, L. /tIT-4 / 'isl'c, ~0-263 / 2016

-FR 3Trp.'n, ~ f;:,-:.r,, 31--rrfxT

~ :~xttf ,r~ coT ~ fti1ffl· ~oito<fto (2.25 -c;~~). ,31·rrm cf iJlcl' (~ ~ TI~ ~) ~Rl~.~_4 ~ l';rRf-~ 26 i) 31'Wrcl ~0ffr.r ~ 7.fi ~t:1 it I

~ ~ ~ W q-JT -;:rrffi f{~ ~oitolTfo (2.2s q11(!&1,:;,~), 3fl1M <i) ~

;3-Tf<R1 ~-22.07.2015 \iTI ~ ~ <l"i\iQk·P.I ·1~ a'r-;fur c.'>r~. 3fFRT cfi -qc;r fc;41¢-

25.07.2015 ci, '+1W.:zr:f -~} ~ - o4.oe.201s c,'51' ~ t 4'i"T ~t -w-ir ~~ cm ~ <R I

~ cf51~, ~ Bf'{f ~ W!.'rrl' cpf ffilE.'fTIT ~l"G?-27 10.2015 c15f f¢1.JT TPXf I

~a=rur ·ct 'flinr qroc "{~· ~~ (fl t:rfflfr'! ~ffi ~ ~~clrq" ci;' f21~~T.fl'ITT~

l;l'R'f ~uyp:if cf. 3Tj·HR <11031TO~O 59 TT.lOi:rr-i / -&iu. m~.£'1-- 290 fr.lovro / c-ITT;~ 10l"{

'9-1.-q.,,;,§ ~ 84 tB0111.:r ,.1~ -q·rm ,rm '3Tt 'F$ -mt ~' Frrcitf-«r >1F1c;,'1 ~ 3im t I

~ 'q'RW}tf "1 ~ct 'C[X'roitoi:fto c51· ~ ~c:Fr f47:i:rr \JJT1T xti,q ~ f! 1 3IB: -:i-1,::-+:J~i

::~ 3rt41~<i ~ WctT t I 11'6 u ~<Wf .cfiffi cr>'1 3Tj'f.ffu x-1 r,, 1 f \i fcnm Tfm ~ I

r ~

I '1, J. ,J . I ( ~o 3f~ §,,9':;· )

1§~ '1mOWfcITT~, -qrn-4

~ : ~ 31'~1. "Boi;ro~ f.i~ mi., 3Trm cJ?r ~f ~ 31NV<l<f> c.~ ~~rm1 J

I :i,'/..,4 -qzjo3!f€!.:;;\~1, ~-4

I

I

Annexure-lI

Table-1; Results of analysis report of inlet & Outlet Effluent of Budhi ka Nagla STP, Agra

s 0. Parameters Inlet Outlet General Standard New Standard for Effluent Effluent for discharge of STPs (draft

Environmental Notification dated: Pollution Part-A: 24.11.2015) Effluent, For Inland surface water

I pH 7.5 8.5 5.5 - 9.0 6.5-9.0 2 BOD, mg/1 154 56.5 30 10 3 COD, mg/1 436 298 250 50 4 TSS, mg/1 228 99.5 100 20 5 NJ-I4-N, mg/I 59.2 42.5 50 5.0 6 N-Total, mg/1 71.5 71.8 100 10 7 Fecal Coliform 2.lxlO<'.S 3.3x10:, -- <100

(MPN/lOOml) 8 P04-P, mg/1 3.82 3.74 5.0 2.0*

*as per directions under section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 regarding treatment and Utilization of sewage for restoration of water quality of river, Letter no.: A-14011/1/2015-MON, dated 09.10.2015, issued by CPCB, Delhi to The Commissioner, Agra Municipal Corporation, Agra. ( copy enclosed as annexure-VII)

Table-2: Results of analysis report of inlet & Outlet Effluent of Jaganpur STP, Agra

Sr. Parameters Inlet Outlet General Standard Standard for new No. Effluent Effluent for discharge of STPs (draft

Environmental Notification dated: Pollution Part-A: 24.11.2015) Effluent, For Inland surface water

I pH 7.2 8.0 5.5 - 9.0 6.5 - 9.0 2 BOD, mg/1 186 95.2 30 10 ,.,

COD, mg/I 623 265 250 50 .)

4 TSS, mg/1 538 57.6 100 20

5 NH4-N, mg/1 49.7 43.2 50 5.0 6 N-T otal, mg/1 67.9 59.4 100 10

7 Fecal Coliform 3.4 x 10 1 4.9 x 10° -- <100 (MPN/1 OOml)

8 P04-P, mg/1 2.15 1.14 5.0 2.0*

*as per directions under section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 regarding treatment and Utilization of sewage for restoration of water quality of river, Letter no.: A-14011/1/2015-MON, dated 09.10.2015, issued by CPCB, Delhi to The Commissioner, Agra Municipal Corporation, Agra

Cent ml Pollution Control Boar<.! Zonal Lnboraiu r i , Dt of Issue : 2?. . I I .?.015 I Page No. : I of I ; P. rovtd bv : TM Issued b : QM

0522 4087600

PICU P 8hawan, Vi hhuti Khand, Gomtinngar, Lucknow Phone : 0522-· 408i600

0522 4087602

S.No \\1/2016/15 WASTEWATlcR TEST REPORT

Date oftest re art: 01102!'.!016 G'f~ ,ProjcCIITest Programme

i ~ ---- ---?;1f! 'i:T W. /''F<'i /"ITTnT /:>l""'f/Samrle Source ((STP.'ETP 'Drain an~ other)J

3 "¥ 'liT 'T<f.TT /u,r~1{£'1ifrsh !r< uf~ompte 1Gi:1o 'l"1l111r,"11< )

.j ~ ~ 'oT.'t ~ ~ 'liT ~ I Sample Collcct~d 'Dcposited hy rz

'!'flT 1('!·~·1"''·"1 ;f.r firf<T/Dnic of Sample collection

6 ~mm if 'l'J'"11 •.rrfi'pf.r ratll'/Da1e of sample receipt in laborato~ 7

,'):IT 115,a.01 ~/Sampling procedure .... ..... . . . ... . Pll•ase Refer ....... .. ..

Fax: 0522 • 4087602

Date/ eriod of testing: 16-20/1/2016 NGT STP · Agra

i Gmb i Sh. Kalicharan ' 14/0 I /2016

16/0 I /2016

!:,1![LJ...~.Q£.','.]Q ~ C'll.'Zl.NiOR ' ) ?ii ISjUC NQ. o I ! ~(:;,:rir ~ :;,~'Analysis indented by !

--------+-Sh. V.K. Shukln. Sc.D & lnchargc. Projec1 Ofiicc, ! CPC8, Aera

Par:rmrlrr l ni1 [lKl\- 1

7.~

- - ---~-i ~/ Tcmpcmtun; • "it .. ··c 10.0

228 l\k~l. /1"~1;-; . m~·l.

3.82 f.ll~/fin . .. ,1

0.943 l f.t. .:;n .,f~ . m~·l ' I lfil ~/Free Ammonia

:;iJ,j f.niJTJ ,h,. o•,:1

m:::-: f\ .q. ···~ 1s~ t.i. :v1-1~ .

11:i;;L

-lJ6 1').;Jl'l ,f?. , I l!l!,1-:. - - ,,·;fi.oIT.fr. I i..' •JD

MPN1i0(1111l I

n-,m~ .. ~W ~ ~.tF.::r.1Test metJ,ods toflowed are eppende::J overtear

CODE I I Bl'N-1 i Inlet ofSTP. Budhi Ka Nag.la, Agra ! Bl~N-2 I Outlet of STP. Budhi Ka Nagla, Ap.ra J' JNP-1 l lnlet of' STP Jaganpur. /\grn

13KN-?. i JNP-1 j

8.5 I 7.2

20.0 I 19.5

99.5 I 538

3.7-1 I

?..15

-~~ 0.386

-125 .jCl .7

I Sb.5 186

~98 i 623 ;

I I

0(:scrip tion

JNl'-2

8.0

20.0

57.6

I 1-l

2.12

43.:!

95.2

:!65

BKN-1 (TKN)

7U

i3KN-2 {TKNJ

"1.8

- --------·-i - --, r JN-l-'--2--...;j-O-ut-k-·t-o_f_S_T_P __ -li-1g~a.._n_p_ur-_~A~g-r_a ________ _ I 13 K:'\--1 -C-fK_'_N_) ....;.l _!t-11-ct_o_f __ S_T_P ___ B_t...,,id'-h-i ,_K_a_N-1a""'g-la-.-A-g-r,-, -------·-------~--- ··--··--·

I BKN-2 (TKN) j Outlet ofSTP. Budhi Ka NM.la. Agra Tcxt~R-cp_o.,,n~t.-,.,~tiri-,u-,o-,->n-~-,.-,c-·~,~----------

'Nul anal~:1.t·d in 1he lab. Values given by r~qui,tioner in the l~,l rcqui~iliun slip .

I

l

Ccntrnl Pollution Control Board Zonal Labornlory ,.. Doc No. CBJZLN/QR/5.10/2 l Issue No. : 02 Dt of Issue : 22.11.2015 Paoc No.: I of I

Amendment no.: 00 I Amendmcm Dt: 00 Approved bv. TM i Issued by: QM m,cr 'lfq,f • ~ w.~. 'ff\l,m ;;.;-{, ~

if.fii , 0522 4087600

PICUP Bhawun, Vibhuti Khan<l, Gomtinagar, Lucknow ~6' Phone: 0522- 4087600

~ , 0522 , 4087602 :;;::;-::"": fax: 0522 - 4087602

WASTEWATER

S.No \V/2016115 TEST REPOR1

~j Date of test report: 20/0I /2016 ··------+-=D:..:a:..:t.::e/-=er=iod of testing: 16-20/1/2016 ___ _ . i I i:rfhi'r;;rrr 1Projccv1'~s1 l'ro[,(rn11!rne NGT ----~-~~---------1~:=:-:---~----~---~--

2 I ~ 'f.T <-fu'f /''f-Wi Afu-r /ZRr/Sampk Sourer ((STPIETP'Dr.iin· ~ny other)) STP - Agra

'~4 __ _1 ' '1;'f.>Pr.f.i <fri:r ~ 'w ~ / Sample Colkc1cd 'Depo~i led t-~

' '1lflT ~ ~ fcin't/Dmc of Sample collec1ion

~. ~!ITT"IT ir rilj!lT llTfu if.T mft'Du1~ of sampk recei1~~-

1- ~ C~<r.,•I ~/Sampli1tg procedure .................. J>l"ase Rcfrr ......... ..

I Sh. Kalicharan 14/0I12016

16/0 1 COi 6

· s ~~~'Analysis indented b) I

Sh. V.K. Shulda. Sc.D & lnchargc, Prc~ect Office. CPCB, Agra

:rirn 1f.r ITTt'Ji,nm ~ Desrriptinn or s.implelC:odc ttc.

~. ,,. Pnrametu

---1- itjr '(,-;if pH

Jl\P- ! iTKN,

JNP-2 1TKN1

rlKN-1 (Fe)

I

BKN-2 (Fe)

JNP-1 tFc)

JNP-2 (Fci

---,~/ Tempcrawr~

-----n 1'3.iz;i-.1 s~. -~~·r..r~-~----_--1 _-_·-_ !,li·~----hfl;Jr.'. :ifi.

<Ui,;,L

. 1·---,-----------+-~1~~~~,~.A~~- ' I ~! l'h,isphuteas_P------4----,=··•:"'.,

1..-:-_;.----+l----' I.

·- f,;• . .:m.A';,.-1 ~1 i---fT .,, ,i,lrl-..1/Free Ammonia "''' I ---

fa. ,n ,fiii. · I "li,:'L

---.--:~:-:~~,"..,:-'-,-:c-:·_:_:------..-.-:=:-:.~=-~:-=·=-•-..--c._i._

9

_+ ;;; I ~ - ! T--l-----rc ~~/F-Colilbrni, MPN:ioo1111 l 2.lxlO'Y·JxlO j 3.4xl0' 4.9xi06

~--~--~--------'-----'----m,cr ·,,,. fofi; *sf ~ a.:uTest melliods followed are apponded overleaf

- -CODE Description I JNP-1 (TKN) Inlet ofSTP Jaganour, A'-!ra I JNP-2 (TKN) Outlel ofSTP Jaganpur. A!'mi ----·--I BK:~- 1 (Fe) lnlel ofSTP. Uudhi Ka Na!!.la, A!.!.r:.i I BKN-2 (Fe) Outlet orSTP. Budhi Ka Nagl:i. Agra

--·---·---:

; JNF-1 (Fe) Inlet of STP Jaganpur. Agra JNP-2 (Fe) Outlet of STP .laganour. Agra

Cnd of 1 c~r R,:pori

(M~nju Sriv:is1avaJ =:r-': ~ m P-nT./:171 Prepared by (Name & Sign) f - n,:. r,:-s.ult:i in the Te:-l R·~r,Mt ~1GIC' fllll~ hi lht: IIL.:m~ lC~h;d 2

I Parameters j Test Method

I -- --·-·-----------------

I

I Detection Range

j I Temeerature APHA 2550 A~B. 2-69 to 2-70. 22~• Ed. 2012 o-5o ·c I Colour APHA 212.0-B, 2·6 lo 2-7. 22"" Ed. 2012 5 - 30000 Hazen

Conductivilv APHA 2510·8, 2-54 to 2·55. 22"''--Ed 2012 0.1 uS/cm -12mSicm cH APHA 4500 H'·B. 4-92 to 4-96. 22"0 Ed. 2012 1 12 I Suscended solids.. APHA 2540 D, 2-66 to 2·67. 22"' Ed. 2012 2.5 moll-10, OOOmoll I Total solids I APHA 2540 B. 2-64. 22'" Ed. 2012 2.5 mgil - 125 g/L Total Dissolved Solids , APHA 2540 C, 2·65. 22'" Ed. 2012 2.5 mail - 100 ail I Volatile Solids APHA 2540 E. 2-67, 22'".Ed. 2012 I 2.S·moll-10, 000'!'~ I urbidily APHA 2130 B. 2-13 to 2-15, 22"' Ed. 2012 0.05 • 1000 NTU Chemical Oxygen APHA 5220 B. 5-17 lo 5-is. 22'"' Ea 2012 ----

J 5m=~-800~~ Demand ICOD) Biochemical Oxygen APHA 5210 B. 5-5 to 5-10, 22 '· Ed 2012 ' 1.0 mglL - 6 mgll demand (80Di 4500 OC. 4-139 lo 4-140. 22"' Ed. 2012 I

I IS-3025 oart 44. 1993 Biochemical_ gxy9en Demand

I Dissolved Oxyaen APHA 4500-0C. 4-139 to 4-140 . 22 • Ed. 2012 l 025-14 m~---Nitrate Nitrogen APHA 4500-NO,·E, 4-125 to 4-127 22'0 Ed 2012 I 0.01-10 mg/L

I (Cadmium Reduction rr.ethoci) : APHA 4500- NO, - B. 4-12210 '1-'123, 22"" Ed 2012 0 05 -200mg/L

' (Ultraviolet Spectrophotomelnc r,1e1nod1 I APHA 4500 NOJ D, 4-124 lo 4-125,n'' Ed 2012 ! 0 14-1400 mfJ/L I (Nitrate Electrode Method)

I Nitrite Nitroger Ammomcal nitrogen

i APHA 4500-NO,-B. 4-120 to 121 22"Ed' 2012

1

1 APHA 4500-NH3·C ~:i-,2- 22"' Ed 2012 (Titrimetnc Me!hod)

0.01 mgll- 1 0 mQIL i 5. 0 rng/L - 100 mgll

APHA 4500-r~H;·". 4-115 to 116. 22"< Ed 2012 1 (Phenate Method )

APHA4500NH, D 4-113104-1 14.22""' Ed2012

O.D2 - 1.0 mg/L

o 03-1 400 mgh. 1-------~mmornum Electro-de Method) i -O~il_a_n~d~Qre_a_se___ · APHA 5520-8. 5-40. 22'" Ed. 2012 _ ----·-- ! 5 mgiL -10,000 mgll !

Phosohate APHA 4500-PD, 4· 154 to 4· 155. 22""Eif"2012 ID.02 moll,2.5 mo/L ' Sulohale I APHA 4500-SO,· E, 4·190 to 4-191 . 22°0 Ed. 2012 \ 2.0 mg/L - 40 mg/l j Alkalinitv APHA 2320-8. 2-34 to 2-36. 2?~d 20fa____ ! 0.1 mg/L - 5000m!Jll:....:

~C""hlcc.o:.ccrioc.:·e:...,,,... _____ i APHA4500-Cl8.4·72to4-73 22"Ed. 2012 , 3.0mq/L-10.000mglL I Chlorine Res,ch,ial I APHA 4500-CI B. d-60 lo 4-62. 22"'.Ed. 2012 l >1 moll I

i-::C.=a:::tc:::iu::.:m!..... ____ __,_1...:.A...:.P...:.H...:.A~3500-Ca B. 3-67 to 3-68. 22'~ Ed. 2012 ; 2.0 mg/L ·4000:ncitL-· I Sodium I APHA 3500-Na S, 3·97 to 3-98. 22'" Ed. 2012 ---'1.o mg/L- 100 mg/L I Potassium I APHA 3500-K B. 3-87 to 3-88. 2t'• Ed. 2012 I 1.0 mg/L - 20 ng/L Maonesium •• I APHA 3500-Ma 8. 3·84 . 2:i''~12 I · _ j

~I -H-a-rd_n_e-ss~T-o-,a-,---- i APHA 2340-C 2·44 to z::"47 2?°" Ed 2012 ; 5 O moll- 10 OOOmg!Lj

I Fluoride APHA 4500-F D 4-87 to ~-88~ 22 ,rEd 2012 --..-0 0-10 mg/L

(SPAONS r..tethod) APHA 4500-F C. 4-85 lo ~-87, 22" ' Ed 2012 O i ·200 mg/L (Ion Selective Electrode Method)

I Sulphide APHA 4500 $' F·:4-1'1-'s'-=2""2"'"-"'E""d-,~20_1_2 ________ >_1 _-0_m_lA-ll----·--I

i Phenoi APHA 5530-B. 5-46 lo 5-47 22r. Ed. 201 . .::.2 _______ ...:i...:Oe.:..1.:...:.:m"'o,;..:IL:..·.::::5.:::.0:..:m.:..:10"',l.::::L_--1 TKN APHA 4500-N,.0 B. 4-131 to 4-133. 22'_"-=E-=d'-. 2"-'0'--1-=2 ____ , -=Occ.2:..rcc.cn""a.1-=L---'8"'0'--m-"10"'1/L-=c----1

l-'-B'-'or'-'-o-n------·--i APHA 4500-6 C, 4-27. 22'" Ed. 261:f" I 0.5 moll -10.0 mg{b._

i--~~~c°-kDl_:_r - -- ~~~~ ;; ; ~ ~::: ;: ~: :~ ~~~: i,-' ~=~~:~;~g-; ;~----'-g~:~-=~~-:~-~-'=ClQ:-~--___,I Lead APHA 3111 A+B, 3:14 10 3.20,22""-=E:.:cd'-. 2::.:o:..:1-=2-----+--=-oc=.sc..-...:5=_.::.o"'_ m""gc.:l:..L __ _

~1ro""n""---------+,A~P:'-H-:':A:'--3::-1c-:1-c1·':Ac-:.,.9_ 3· 14 lo 3-20, 22"' Ed. 2012 0 .2 - 5.0 mgll Cadmium APHA 3111 A+B, 3-14 to 3-20. 22"JEd.201 :r------+-o'"'.1'-.2-.""'5-=m-'m~.l~L~--~!

Zinc I APHA 3111 A+B. 3-14 lo 3·2=0~22:..·"=--=E-=d...:. 2=0'--1-=2-----+--=o._2_-_2_.o_mgll --· j i-,::C.:..:h:.;:ro::..:m.;;;iu::.:m"------ I APHA 3111 A+B. 3-14 to 3-iO 22"· Ed. 2012 O.? • 5.0 mgll

Manganese __ ___::i APHA3111 A+B 3-14 !03-20, 22~-.Ed 2012 ------·- 01 • 2.5moil Coball i APHA 3111 MB. 3-14 lo 3-20, 22. Ed. 2012 0.2 • 3 0 moll 1 Mercurv APHA 3112-6. 3-23 lo 3-25. 22"' Ed 2012 10 • 50 H.9!'.I...__._ 1

1..!!A!.::rs~e~ni:!.lce-____ -4.!A:o,P...:H.:cA,:...:::.31'-'1c.::4c.,·B"',""3"'.3:=4-to3·38,22""Ed.2012 10 -50 uan --i Chromium. VI APHA 3500-Cr B, 3-69 lo 3-70. 22'" Ed. 2012 0.1 mgll -1.0 mg/L I Total Coliform APHA 22"0 Ed. 2012, 9221·.t. B &C pages 9-65 to 9-73. 1.8 MPN/100ml & - ·,

above I recal Coliform APHA 22'"' Ed. 2012. 9221-C (2) pages 9·69 to 9-73. 1 S MPN1100ml &. I

LI _________ ...J...:9=2~2~1-=E~o=a'-o~es~9~·~7~,·~~to,_.~9...:.·7~5- -----------'-=a:.:cb~o·~·e"------

1. 1SC - l ntenocicty Commitlcc 2. USE PA - United States Envin,nmcntnl I'rot<>ction Agency 3. ISO - lntcrnatioui1l Organisation for St:rnd:1rdi2u1ion 4. IS - lndian Standard 5. APHA - American Public Health .-\ssociati,rn

I

S. No.

1.

2.

3.

5.

I71e Enl'iro11me11t I Proti!cri,mi Rules. I 986

1[SCHEDULE - VI] (See rule 3A)

545

GENERAL STANDARDS FOR DISCHARGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS PART-A: EFFLUENTS

Parameter

2

Colour and odour

Suspended solids mg/I, Max.

Particulate size of suspended solids

pH Value

Inland surface water

(a)

See 6 of Annexure-1

100

Shall pass 850 micron IS Sieve

5.5 to 9.0

Public Sev,ers

(b)

600

Standards

Land for irrigation

3

(c)

See 6 of Annexure

-I

200

Marine coastal areas

(d)

See 6 of Annexure-l

(a) For process waste water-100

(b) For cooling water effluent 10 percent above total suspended matter of influent.

(a)Floatable solids, max. 3 mm.

(b) Settleable solids, max.

850 microns.

5.5 to 9.0 5.5 to 9 .0 5.5 to 9.0

6. Temperature shall not exceed 5°C above the receiving water temperature

shall not exceed 5°C above the receiving water temperature

sc:1edule V[ inserted by Ruk 2(d) of the Environment (Protection) Second Amc"ndment Rules. 1993 nnlitied

vide G.S.R. 422(E) dated I 9.05.1993. published in the Gazette No. 17-1 dated l 9.05.1993.

Omitted by Rule 2(d)li ) of th<: Environment (Protedion) Third Amcmlmcnl Rules. 1993 vi,k Notilicatiun

;'ic.G.S.R.801(£). dated 3!.12.1993.

I

5-l(i I7!e Em·ir o 11 111<!11t (Pro rl!ctio11 l Rules, 1986

S. Parameter Standards No.

Inland Public Land for Marine coastal surface Sewers irrigation areas water

2 3

(a) (b) (c) (d)

7. Oil and grease 10 20 10 20 mg/I Max.

8. Total residual 1.0 1 0 chlorin mg/I Max.

9. Ammonical 50 50 50 nitrogen (as N), mg/I Max.

10. Total Kjeldahl 100 . 100 Nitrogen (as NH3) mg/I , Max.

H Free ammonia (as 5.0 5.0 NH3 ) mg/I , Max.

12. Biochemical 30 350 100 100 Oxygen demand 1 [3 days at 27°C] mg/I max.

13. Chemical Oxygen 250 250 Demand, mg/I, max.

14. Arsenic (as Asj. 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 mg/I, max.

15. Mercury (as Hg). 0.01 0.01 0.01 mg/I, Max.

16. Lead (as Pb) mg/I, 0.1 1.0 2.0 Max.

17. Cadmium (as Cd) 2.0 1.0 2.0 mg/I, Max.

18. Hexavalent 0.1 2.0 1.0 Chromium (as Cr+6), mg/I max.

Substituted by R,dd of the Environment (Protection) ,\mendmcnt Rules, 1996 notified by G.S.R.176. dated 2.-!.1996 muy be rend as BOD (3 duyq :1t 1i"C) wherever BOD 5 days 20''( occurred. .

'I

The 1.i"m"iron111~11f I l'ro1.:crion 1 1111/es. 1986 547

s Parameter Standards No.

Inland Public Land for Marine coastal surface Sewers · irrigation areas water

2 3

(a) (b) (c) (d)

19. Total chromium (as 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cr.) mg/I, Max.

20 . Copper (as Cu) 3.0 3.0 3 .0 mg/I, Max.

21 . Zinc (As Zn.) mg/I, 5.0 15 15 Max.

22 . Selenium (as Se.) 0.05 0.05 0.05 mg/I, Max.

23 Nickel (as Ni) mg/I, 3.0 3.0 5.0 Max.

1 24 * * * *

125 * "' *

126. ·l- :'r * ..

27. Cyanide (as CN) 0.2 2 .0 • 0.2 0.2 mg/I Max.

128.

29. Fluoride (as F) mg/I 2.0 15 15 Max.

30. Dissolved 5.0 Phosphates (as P), mg/I Max.

231 .

32 . Sulphide (as S) 2.0 5.0 mg/I Max.

33. Phenoile 1.0 5.0 5.0 compounds (as CsH50H) mg/I, Max.

Omitted by Ruh: 2(tl)(i) or lhe E1wiromnenl 1_Prolccl1011J Thi.rd Amendment Ruks. 1993 vi,k No1ilication

~o.G.S .R.80i(E). dated 3 l.12.1993.

.54i' ll1e Eni·iron111.111t rJ>mr.1crio11• Rules. /986

S. Parameter Standards No.

Inland Public Land for Marine coastal surface Sewers irrigation areas water

2 3

(a) (b) (c) (d)

34. Radioactive materials :

(a) Alpha emitter 10·1• 10-i 10-8 10-7

micro curie/ml.

(b) Beta emitter ·10.(j 10-6 10-' 10-6 micro curie/ml.

35. Bio-assay test 90% survival of 90% 90% 90% survival o" fish after 96 survival of survival of fish after 96

hours in ·100% fish after fish after hours in 100% effluent 9611ours 96 hours effluent

In 100% in 100% effluent effluent

36. Manganese (as 2mg/l 2 mg/I 2 mg/I Mn)

37. Iron (as Fe) 3 mg/I 3 mg/I 3 mg/I

38. Vanadium (as V) 0.2 mg/I 0.2 mg/I 0.2 mg/I

39. Nitrate Nitrogen 10 mg/I 20 mg/I 140 . * ••

Omitted by Rule 2(d1(i) of the Environment ( Prmcction) 1''1ird Amcndm"1.lt Ruks. J 99.J ,·ide Notification Ko. (i.S.I'. 80 l(E) ua!~d 3 I. I ~.1993

f11e Em"iro11111.:;11 r l'ror,::crfo111 /111/es. ! 986 5-J.')

WASTE WATER GENERATION STANDARDS - PART-B

S.No. Industry

1. Integrated Iron & Steel

2. Sugar

3. Pulp & Paper industries

4.

5.

(a) Larger pulp & paper

(i) Pulp & Paper

(ii)Viscose Staple Fibre

(iii)Viscose Filament Yarn

(b) Small Pulp & Paper :

(i) Agro residue based

(ii) Waste paper based

Fermentation Industries :

(a) Maltry

(b) Brewery

(c) Distillery

Caustic Soda

(a) Membrane cell process

(b) Mercury cell process

6. Textile Industries :

7.

8.

9.

Man-made Fibre

(i) Nylon & Polyster

(ii) Vixcose rayon Tanneries

Starch. Glucose and related products

Dairy

Quantum

16 m3/tonne of finished steel

0.4 m3/tonne of cane crushed

175 m3/tonne of paper produced

150 m3/tonne of product

500 m3/tonne of product



3.5 m3/tonne of grain procluced

0,.25 m3/KL of beer produced

12 m3/KL of alcohol produced

1 m3/tonne of caustic soda produced excluding cooling tower blowdown

4 m3/tonne of caustic soda produced (mercury bearing)

10% blowclown permitted for cooling tower

120 m3/tonne offibre produced

150 m3/tonne of product 28 m3/tonne of raw hide

8 m3/tonne of maize crushed

3 m3/KL of Milk

,

55ll The Ei11-iro11111c·11t f /Jmiec·1io11 i Rules. 1986

1 O. Natural rubber processing industry

4 m3/tonne of rubber

11. Fertilizer

(a) Straight nitrogenous ·fertilizer

(b) Straight phosphatic fertilizer (SSP & TSP) excluding manufacture of any acid

(c) Complex fertilizer

5 m3/tonne of urea or equ ivalent produced

0.5 m3/tonne of SSP/TSP

Standards of nitrogenous and phosphatic fertilizers are applicable depending on the primary product

LOAD BASED STANDARDS - PART-C

1(1. Petroleum Oil Refinery:

Parameter Standard 1 2

Quantum limit in Kg/I 1,000 tonne of crude orocessed

1. Oil & Grease 2.0 2. BOD 3dal/s. 2/c 6.0 3. COD 50 4. Suspended Solids I 8.0 5. Phenols 0.14 6. Sulphides 0.2 7. CN 0.08 8. Ammonia as N 6.0 9. TKN 16 10. P i .2 11. Cr (Hexavalent ) 0.04 12. Cr( 1 otal) 0.8 13. Pb 0.04 14. Hg I 0.004 15.Zn 2.0 16. Ni 0.4 17. Cu 0.4 18. V 0.8 19. Benzene 0.04 20. Benzo (a) - Pvrene 0.08

Substinned by Rule 2(ii)(a) of the Environment tProiection) Amendment Rules, 2008 notified by G.S.R. I 86(E), dated IS.3.2008

Notes: (i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

l11e 1;nriro111Jli!III, Pmic"C'iim1i 1?11 /c~<. 1986 55 1

Quantum limit shall be applicable for discl1arge of total effluent (process effluent, cooling water blow down including sea cooling water blow down, washings, etc.) to receiving environment ( excluding direct application on land for irrigation/horticulture purposes within the premises of refinery) . In orcler to measure the quantity of effluent (separately for discharge to receiving environment, application for irrigation/horticulture purposes within the premises of refinery & blow-down of cooling systems), appropriate flow measuring devices (e.g. V-notch. flow meters) shall be provided with. Quantum of pollutants shall be calculated on the basis of daily average of concentration values (one 24-hourly composite sample or average of three grab samples, as the case may be), average flow of effluent during the day and crude throughput capacity of the refinery. Limit for quantity of effluent discharged (excluding blow-down from seawater cooling) shall be 400 m3/1000 tonne of crude processed. However, for refineries located in high rain fall area, limit of quantity of effluent only during rainy days shall be 700 m3!1000 tonne of crude processed1.

Large Pulp & Paper, News Print! Rayon grade Plants of capacity above 24000 tonne/ Annum

Parameter Quantum

Total Organic Chloride (TOCI) 2 kg/tonne of product.

GEi\.ERAL EMISSION STANDARDS - PART-D

I. Concentration Based Standards

SI. Parameter Standard No.

1. Particulate Matter (PM)

2. Total Fluoride

3. Asbestos

Concentration not to exceed (in mg/Nm3

)

150

25

4 Fibres/cc and dust should not be more than 2 mg/Nm3

55.2

4.

5.

6.

17_

8.

9. 110.

11. 112.

!l.

Th e l:'1ll'irom11c·11t r l'mk·crion' Rules. ! 98/'i

Mercury

Chlrine

Hydrochioric acid vapour and mist

* * *

Sulphuric acid mist

Carbon monoxide

* * *

Lead

* * *

Equipment based Standards

0.2

15

35

50

1 % max. (v/v)

*

10 mg/Nm3

*

2[For dispersal of sulphur dioxide, in minimum stack height limit is accordingly prescribed as below]

SI. No. Parameter Standard

1. Sulphur dioxide Stack-height limit in metre

(i) Power generation capacity :

- 500 MW and more 275

- 200/21 O MW and above to 220 less than 500 MW

- less than 200/21 O MW H=-14(0) 0·3

(ii) Steam generation capacity

- Less than 2 tonne/h Less than 8.5 MT 9

- 2 to 5 tonne/h 8.5 to 21 MT 12

- 5 to 10 tonne/h 21 to 42 MT ·15

- 10 to 15 tonne/h 42 to 64 MT 18

- 15 to 20 tonne/11 64 to 104 MT 21

- 20 to 25 tonne/h 104 to 105 MT 24

- 25 to 30 tonne/h 105 to 126 MT 27

- More than 30 tonne/11 More tl,an 126 MT 30

or using the formula H=14(Q)0 3

Omitted by Rule 2 (g) (iY) of the Eov,ronm~m ! Protecti,,n I ·n1ird Amendment Rules. I 993 \'ide G.S.R. SO JI LJ dated 3].]2.1993.

Substit11te<l by Ruh., 2(h)(i). ib,d.

"f11e f i'11viro11111rnt f l'mr.!cifom R11/t?s. l 986

Not~ : H - Physical height of the stack in metre Q - Emission rate of S02 in kg/hr.

Ill. l oad/Mass based Standards

SL Industry Parameter

553

Standard

No.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ l.

3.

Fertiliser (Urea) Commissioned Prior Lo 1.1.8::?.

Commissioned after 1.1.82

Copper, Lead and Zinc Smctcr/convertcr

Nit.lie Acid

Sulphuric Acid Plant

Particulate Maller (PM) Particulate Matter (PM) Sulphur dioxide

Oxides of Nitrogen

Sulphmic Acid (tonne/dav) ·

Sulphur dioxide Upto 300 tS02)

Above 100

5 Coke Oven C::irbon Monoxide

'l6. PctToleum Oil Refinery (Sulphur R.ecovery)

Sulphur Dioxide

* SRU - Sulphur Recovery Unitl

Installed Capacity of SRU* ( tonneidny)

Above 20

5 to 20 Upto 5

2 kg/tonne of product

0.5 kg/tonne of product

4 kg/tonne of conccn ttated ( J 00% acid produced 3 kg/tonne of ·weak acid (before concentration) produced Quantum Limit in kg/tonne Plant capacity for 100'}~ Existing Unit New Unit

concentration of

2.5 2.0

2.0 1.51

3 kg/tonne of coke produced .

Kg/tonne of sulphur in the feed to SRU

Existing New SRU SRU 26 10

80 4·0 120 80

3ubstitutcd by Ruh: 2(ii) of the Envir,;nmcnl (Prntccii.in) T11ird .\mcndment Rules, 2003 notified by G.S.R.3-W(E).

d .. ·1cd 7.5 .2008. S11bsritured by Rule 2 of the Em·iromnent (Protection) Fifth Amendment Rules. 2009 notified by G.S .R.595(E), Jated

2 . . S.2009.

1

55-!- l11e Hnviron1;;cnt t P;·oriJciio111 Rules. !986

7. Aluminium Plants :

(i) Anode Bake Oven Total Fluoride 0.3 Kg/~;lT of Aluminium

(ii) Pot room

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

vss HSS

PBSW

PBCW

-do-

-do-

-do-

-do-

4.7 Kg/MT of Aluminium

6 Kg/MT of Aluminium



Note: vss = HSS = PBSW= PBCW=

Vertical Stud Soderberg Horizontal Stud Soderberg Pre Backed Side Work Pre B::icked Centre Work

8. Glass Industry:

(a) Furnace Capacity

(i) Up in the product draw Pa1iiculate matter 2 Kg/hr ca capacity of 60 MTD/Day

(ii) Product draw capacity -do- 0.8 Kg/MT of Product drawn more than 60 MT/Day

"NOISE STANDARDS - PART-E

A. Noise Limits for Automobiles (Free Field Distance at 7.5 Metre in dB(A) at the manufacturing Stage

(a) Motorcycle, Scooters & Three Wheelers

(b) Passenger Cars

(c) Passenger or Comme.rcial vehicles upto 4 iVIT

(d) Passenger or Commercial vehicles above 4 MT

and upto 12 MT

(e) Passenger or Commercial vehicles exceeding

12MT

, Standards notified al S. No. 46 may also b~ rdetTcd.

80

82

85

89

91

1 _ -oi e limits for vehicles applicable ar manufacturing stage from the .'ear 2003

~ial Type of vehicle ~oise Date of

1 · u~~e,

limi ts implementation dB(A}

(2) (3) (4) Two wheeler Displacement upto 80 cm' 75 D-isplaccrncnt more than 80 cm\ but uplo 175 77 1 '1 January,2U03 cm3

Displacement more than 17 5 cnl 80 2. Three wheeler

Displacement upto 175 cm' 77 l 'r January,2003 Displacement more than l 7 5 cm3 80

3. Passenger Car 75 l" Januarv. 2003 --l. Passenger or Commercial Vehicles

Gross vehicle weight upto 4 to1rncs 80 Gross vehicle weight more than 4 to1mes but 83 l" July. 2003 uoto 12 tonnes.

t---

-- Gross vehicle weight more than 12 tonnes. 85

(2)1 1frsc limits for vehicle· at manufacturing stage applicable on and from l '1Ap1·i!, 200~

Serial Type of vehicles Noise 1 'umb(~r limits

dB(A) 1.0 Two wheelers -1.1 Displacement upto 80 cc 75 1.2 Displacement more than 80 cc but upto l 75 cc 77

I 1.3 Displacement more than 175 cc 80 I 2.0 Three wheelers I '.:.i Displacement upto 175 cc 77 I 2.2 , Displacement more Lhan 175 cc 80

13.0 Vehicle· u 'Cd for the carriage of passengers and capable of 7-1-h,n"ing not more than nine seats, including the driver's seat

S1bst1tutcd · v R., • .: 2 ol ~ Eu,·ironms"lll {Pro1cc1ion) Fout1h ,\mcn<lmcnt Rules, 2002 nolilictl ·1<lc Notilicat6ion

li S.R.. :J9(E)~ d:i:.:c JO. I :.2002 (Earlier · AA - 'oi,e !units for veh1cb 'Y.e.f. I" January 2003 · mserted by R.uk 2 (2) ol th<! Envi..,,mm~n: l?:ok.;·,onJ .\rncndmc::il Ruks. 2000 nolilicd ,·1,k. ·..,1ilicat10n G.S.R. 7-l2(E). cb1c<l 25.9.2tl0U.)

The /:'r:\·ironntr:ur, Frot._'ciiorn 1?11/es. 1986

..J..O Vehicles used for the carriage of passengers having more than nine seats, including tile driver's scat, and a maximum Gross Vehicle Weight (G\F\..V) of more than 3.5 tonnes

I J

-U With an engine power less than 150 KW 78 4.2 Wilh an engine -power of I 50 K\.V or above. ~o ~ 5.0 Vehicles used for the carriage of passengers having more

than nine seats, including the driver's seat : vehicles used for the carriage of goods.

5.1 With a maximum GVW hot exceedmg 2 L01mes 5.2 With a maximum GVW greater than 3 Lonnes but not exceeding

I •6 I

77

I

I

I 3.5 tonnes 6.0 Vehicles used for the transport of good.

maximum GVW c:xcectling 3.5 tonnes. 6.1 With an engine power less than 75 KW 6.2 With an engi:nc power of 75 K\V or above but

with a

less than I SO I ,7

78

-i J ~ I

KW. 6.3 With ruJ engine power of 150 KW or above. 80] j

1[Provided that for vehicles mentioned at serial numbers 3.0 to· 6.3 , the nois3 limits for the following States shall be applicable on and from the date specifiej against that State,-

(i) Himachal Pradesh with effect from 1st October, 2005 (ii) Jammu and Kashmir with effect from ·1st October, 2006 (iii) Madhya Pradesh with effect from 1st September, 2005 (iv) Punjab with effect from 1st October, 2005 (v) Rajasthan witl1 effect from 1st June, 2005 (vi) Uttar Pradesh (Mathura, KannauJ, Muzaffarnagar, Aliga i,. Faru kabac ,

3aharanpur, Badaun, Barreily, Moradabad, Hathras, Rampur, Bijnor, Agra, Pilibhit, J.P. Nagar, Mainpuri, Lalitpur, Hardio, Ferozabad, Jhansi, Shahjahanpur, Etawah, Jalon, Lakh impur, Kheri, Etar. Mahoba, anc!

(vii)

8.

Sitapur) with effect from 1st June, 2005. Uttranchal 11>1ith effect from 1st Ju!y, 2005.

Domestic appliances and construe ion equiprriems at [' e -nanufactunng stage to be achieved by 31 51 December. 1993

(a) Window Air Conditioners of 1 ton to 1.5 tor (b) Air Coolers ~ c) Refrigerators [(d) * * * ..... .

(e) Compactors (rollers),Front Loaders,Concrete mixers,Cranes(moveable),Vibrators and Saws

68 60 46

. .. ]

75

!nscrt<:d by the Environment (Protection) Amendment Rules. 2005 notili-.:d vidc No1i[ication G.S.R.27:2 (E). <laid 5.5.1005.

Entry (d) relating to 'Diesel (ienerator of Domestic Prn11o;cs ...... 85 - <JO' omitted by Rule 3 of the Enl"ironmem (Protection) Second Amendment. Ruks. 2002 nolilicd vi,k Nutilicalion G.S.R.371 (E). cbt~d l 7.5.2002.

A \JNEXUR E-'

(=o, t e ourposes of Parts - A, 8 a d C)

- ,...e Siate Boa-ds si al' followirg guide-lines in enforcing the standards ~ps_;fied under he schedule VI:

('1) the waste waters and gases are to be treated with the best available technology (BAT) in order to achieve the prescribed standards.

(2) the industries need to be encouraged for recycling and reuse, of waste materials as far as practicable in order to minimize the discharge of wastes into the environments.

(3) the industries are to be encouraged for recovery of biogas, energy and reusable materials.

(4) while permitting the discharge of effluent and emission into the environment, State Boards have to take into account the assimilative capacities of the receiving bodies, especially water bodies so that quality of the intended use of the receiving waters is not affected . Where such quality is likely to be effected discharges should not be allowed into water bodies.

(5) the Central and State Boards shall put emphasis on the implementation of clean technologies by the industries in orcler to increase fuel efficiency and reduce the generation of environmental pollutants

(6) All efforts should be made to remove colour and unpleasant odour as far as practicable.

(7) The standards mentioned in the Schedule shall also apply to all other effluents discharged such as industrial mining , and mineral processing activities and sewage.

(8) the limit given for the total concentration of mercury in the final effluent of caustic soda industry, is for the combined effluent from (a) Cell house, (b) Brine Plant, (c) Chlorine handling, (d) hydrogen handling and (e) hydro choleric acid plant.

(9) 1[(a) .... (f)]

(1 O) All effluents discharge including from the industries such as cotton textile, composite woolen mills. synthetic rubber, small pulp & p~per, natural rubber, petro-chemicals, tanneries, point dyes,

O mned by Rule .J of the Enviroumcnt (Protection"! Rub. 1')961101itied by notific:itinn Ci.S.R 176(E). dated 2.-1.19%.

I

slaughter nouses, fooa & fru,t processing arid diary ;nausl!"ies 1ntc surface 1,vaters sl1a!I confo,m to be BOD limit specified ;;1bo'tG. namely 30 mg/L For discharge an effluen t r,2 iing a SCS rncra than 30 mg.II, the ·standards shall confor.m to ti1ose given :0 :':Jc1e for other receiving bodies, namely, sewers, coastal waters, an..i land for irrigation.

( 12) Ir case of fertilizer industry the lirrii{s .in res::ie~t ,f cl:rorr:ium arid fluoride shall be compiied with at the outlet of ct1rorr1iurr; · and fluoride removal uni1.s respectively.

( 13) !n case of pesticides :

(a) The lrm1ts shou.ld oe complied with at the. enc of t:,e trea:ment plant be:ore dilution.

tb) B10-2ssay ,est s:1ou1d c0 carried out With rre c:\ .: :~,:. 1-e si:ec:es of fish in the rece1vi:ig water, t!lc c:oo li,:··1~. : ... - :.;e si:;ecif:ed in the consent co,,ditions shculc! .•:-,;, c:m-,i:a~:::c: ·. i•

trit BOD lirrnts.

In case rncnabolites anc' isomers of th•:.- Pe2ticicl~~ ,.., f·,,:. given list are fauna in s1gr1ificani concentrarnn. :::,anch::;:,:::; shcLild ::,e prescribeo fo1 these a;~r:· in th-2 $~,..,',?

concentre.~,on as tr& inc!ividual pesticides

(d'1 Industries a~c reo...i1re':l to analyze pest odes ;n .•\.2s.-~ at~.· by advancec 2r;al:/1ca1 ·11ethods sucn as GLC1HPLC

(214) T1le chemical oxygsn aemand- (C001 conc:e .... ec.:c101 1 ,. a i,r::a'ed effluent. if observea w be persistently graato::r :han 250 mg/! before clispcsa! to any rece iv ing body lpubiic sev.ts,, lane.: fr)r

irrigation, inland S1jr.ace water ar.d mai"ine coasral araosJ, _;uc11 industrial units are reGuired to identify crernic21s ca....:sin[ ihe same. !n case t:-,ese are "ound to bE: toxic 33 aerineC: El i1e Schedule I of the Hazardous Rules 1989 the S a~e Soar:: ·n st..,:,,. cases snail direct 1he i:idustries ,o ir·stal! 'erti~ry ,reatr,1e:·i stipulating time limit.

(15) Standards specified in Par: A of Schedule - /i -: r disc~argc 1/ effluent into Hie public sewer shall be applicable or!y ;f SL!c:1 se\11 &r leads to a secondary treatment including b1oic9ic2: ~r.:,2tn1e,·,t system, otherwise the discharge l:iio sewers sh2ii be tre2t~d as dischaige into inland surface waters].

Ornitr.:cl by Rule. 2(k) (Vll) 0f the Env1roume11t (Protecnon) ·1 hird mucnJmcnt Rules. 1993 vice 1 ,.S.f! 80 I 1.:). J~rtd 3l.11 .1993.

lnserteJ by ruk .!(k) (i:1-). ihicl.

II

..

Ai 'NEXURE-1;

(For the purpose of Part-D)

The State Boards shall follow the following guidelines in enforcing the standards specified under Schedule VI:

("' \ ~,

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

In case of cement plants, the total dust (from all sections) shall be within 400 mg/Nm3 and 250 mg/Nm3 for the plants upto 200 t/d and more than 200 t/d capacities respectively.

In respect of calcinations process (e.g. Aluminum Plants) Kilns. and step Grate Bagasse fired-Boilers. Particulate Matter (PM) emissions shall be within 250 mg/Nm3

.

In case of thermal power plants commissioned prior to 01.01.1982 and having generation capacity less than 62.5 MW, the PM emission shall be within 350 mg/Nm3

.

In case of Lime Kilns of capacity more than 5 t/day and upto 40 t/day, the PM emission shall be within 500 mg/Nm3

.

In case of horse shoe/pulsating Grate and Spreader Stroker Bagassefired-Boilders, the PM emission shall be within 500 (12% C02) and 800 (12% C02) mg/Nm3 respectively. In respect of these boilers, if more than attached to a single stack, the emission standards shall be fixed, based on added capacity of all the boilers connected with the stack.

In case of asbestos dust, the same shall not exceed 2mg/Nm3.

In case of the urea plants commissioned after 01.01.92, coke ovens and lead glass units. the PM emission sha!! be within 50 mg/Nm3

.

In case of small boilers of capacity less than 2 tons/hour and between 2 to 5 tons/ hour, the PM emissions shall be within 1000 and 1200 mg/Nm3

.

In case of integrated Iron and Steel Plants. PM emission upto 400 mg/Nm3 shall be allowed during oxygen lancing .

I

560

U)

1he E111·iro11111ei11 ,Prorection i Ru/2s. i 986

In case of stone crushing units , the suspended PM contribution value at o distance of 40 meters from a controlled, isolated as well as from a unii located in cluster should be less than 600 micrograms/Nm3

. 1(-" '' *) These. units must also adopt the following pollution control measures :

(i) Oust containment cum suppression system for the equipment;

(ii) Construction of wind breaking walls;

(iii) Construction of the metalled roads within the premises;

(iv) Regular cleaning and wetting of the ground within the premises;

(v) Growing of a green belt along with periphery.

(k) In case ot Ceramic industry, from the other sources of pollution, such as. basic raw materials and processing operations, heat recovery dryers mechanical finishing operation, all possible preventive measures shou lcl be taken to control PM emis~ion as far as practicable.

2. The total fluoride emission in respect of Glass and Phosphatic Fertilize~ shall not exceed 5 mg/Nm3 and 25 mg/Nm3 respectively

23. [!n case of copper, lead and zinc smelting, the off-gases may. as far a~. i:;ossibie, be utilized for manufacturing sulphuric acid]

34. [ln case of cupolas (Foundries) having capacity (mel ing rmeJ less than z tonne/hour, the particulate matter emission shall be ·within 450 mg/Nm3.

In these cases it is essential that stack is constructed over the cupolas beyond the charging door and tne emissions are directed through the stack, which should be at least six times the diameter of cupola. ir, respect of Arc Furnaces and Induction Furnaces, provision has to bEmade 'for collecting the fumes before discharging the erniss:ons througr, the stack].

[No. Q-15017/24/89-CP\/\{ MUKUL SANWAL, Jt. Secy:

Omilled by Ruic 2(i)1_i1i) of the 1:nv1roarnen1 1 Protection I Third Amendment Rnle,. l 993, vide G ... R. SOI (D d.it :·J 3i.!2.l993 . .

Substitul<:d by Ruk '.!([ )(i); fo1<L

Added by Rule'.!( l)(1i). Ibid.

I I

DR! e Cen- '-'-I G · ":Tl ·n: ,opo_es En ir"n'l:e":

·e : formation of publi likely to be affcci:ed thereby: .e .:-"id _ra"- no i:"ic:uio . ~hall be taken into consideration on or after the expirv

1e dite n \··hicn thi · craft has be' n made available to public through this \Vebsit~

~ - n: to Dr. .. 8.Akolk2r. _ 1 . CPCB anci fr. R. ·.Pankaj, DD (CP): adaba .. pcb'@nic.in and

To be putl 1 ·hed in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part H, Section 3, Sub-section (i)J GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

\1INISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE NOTIFICA Tl OK

New Delhi, ----------November, 2015

G .. . R. {E).- ln exercise of the powers conferred by sections 6 and 25 of the Em,iror ment (Protection) Act, [ 986 (29 of 1986), the Central Government hereby makes the foll wing rules further to amend the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, narndy

(I) These rules may be cailed the Environment (Protection) Amendment Rules, 2015. ('.21 They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. in the Environment (Protection) Ruies. I 986. in Schedule - l ( i) in 1'. ·isting serial number ---------------------------(to be assigned la1er) for the existing cmrie, and entries relating thereto . the following ~erial number and entries shall be ne\\ . narncl~ :-

ST.-.\NDJ,RDS FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS ALONG 'WITH TIME FR.A 1E FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Efi1uem discharged standards for Se\vage Treatment Plant are mentioned below:

SI. Industry Parameters Standards for New STPs (Design after No. notificati'on date)*

I Sev,raoe Treat;ent Plant

pH 6.5-9.0

I BOD 10 I

COD 50

TSS 20

'\1l ·I4-N 5

I . '-total I

IO I

I Fecal Coliform <100 l

I

I I I

I ( tv1 p 1/1001111) _l_

I 1'oh.:: . ~ I

(i) Ail values in mg/I exc~pt for pH an.:! Coli.arm. (ii) These standards will be applic::ble for discharge in water re~ources ~ well as

for land di posa!. The standards for Fe-cal Coliform ma. · nol be applied for use

I

,.,f tre3.icd SC\ age in industrial purposes. Achievements of Standard for existing STPs within 05 years from date of noLi fication.

[F.No. - Q-150 l 7/2/2008-CPW]

(Dr. Rashid Hasan) Advisor

'.'\oli:: - Th"' principal rules ·were published in the Gazell~ or India. Extraordinary. Part II, :-.ection ~ .sub-section {.i) vide notification number S.0. 844 (E). J 9th 1ovember. 1986 and subsequently amended vide notifications numbers S.O. 433 (E), dated 18th April 1917; S.O. 8(E) dated 3ru January. 1989; G.S.R. 176(E) dated 2"d April, 1996; G.S.R. 97 (['. dated the 18111 February, 2009: G.S.R. 14lJ ([). dated the 4th :vtarch. 2009: G.S.R. 54J(E). dated 2211d July,2009: G.S.R. 739 (E)_ dated the 9th September. 20 I 0: C.S.R. 809(E). dated, the 4th October. 2010. G.S.R. 2 15 (E). dated the 15

111 March. 2011:

Ci.'.l.R. 221 (E), dated the ! gth March. 2(J l l: G.S.R. 354 (E), da1ed the 211d Ma). 20 l l:

(i.S.R. 424 (E). dated the 1s1 June. 2011: G.S.R. 446 (E) dated the 13111

June, 201 L G.S.R. l52 (E), dated the 16111 March, :?.Oi 2; G.S.R. :266(E). dated the 30th March, 2012; Wi( G.S.R. 277 (£). dated the .31st \farch. 2012: and G.S.R. 820(E). dated the 9[h

1'nvember, 2012; G.S.R. 176 (E). dated th~ 1811' f\forch. 2013: G.S.R. 535(E). dated the

7:h .\ugust. 2013~ G.S.R. 771([). dated the l Ith December, 20i3: Ci.S.R. 2(E). dated the 2··,: January~ 2014: G.S.R. 229 {E), d::ncd rhe 28 111 1arch. '.W14; G.S.R. 232(£), dated the

3 i" M:arch, 2014; G.S.R. 325tE). dated the 07'11 May, 2014, G.S.R. 612 (E}, dated th 25 11• August 2014 and lastly amended vide notification G.S.R. 789(E), dated 11th

1 0·1 rnher 2014.

I

--·- -........

ircrr if. ~~' ~~. 3il1'"T"xT

/xfr-4 / vrcq "fi50-2s4 I 2015 ~

/~/~~~

fcrcm : ~ \J"J•H9,-< c;lJ1&1~ii1 ~oi'rolfro (14 ~J..J~ci,s1), 3WRT cB" \J1C1 (~ RcITTuT crm

A4-51°1) ~, 1974 cm- tITTT-25 /26 ~ -~-~ ~ cB" ~'cf if I

~ -3q,?1cro ~o \J"J 11.-i9,;;;: c;lil&1~1·1 10,oi'rolfro cB" ~ ~ ~-22.07.2015

"l:n1" fco" ~ cf>llltcili B ~ cf51lit&1<.1, 3Wm cii L[?f ~-25.07.2015 c5 .:nm ~

~-04.08.2015 "cf>l" ~ t cB"T *'4 m ¢'<~ cf5T ~ ~ I ~ cfil<-llcill, 3WRT &RT

!,J.'flllci ~x-1e'ILJ01 cB"T frlita,ur ~-27.10.2015 q5T "fcnm Tf"Y-!T I R:mfiluf cB" '[-f1,lf ~ T-f

~fZ&cF>;;;:01 cfi ~ A«11Ra ~fcs<Jta '30lc\1¢ cf) Rl~&1tioi1q -~1 ~ ~ qR 0 11'1'i cfJ 3fjffR

~03110~0 55 Pi"O"lJTB / ~, xfr~- 310 PiOlJTO / ~ ~ -.(-1'{-'-J~-s-s '{ilft-s 81

fiio"lJTB/~ -qim ~ "l:n1" fctJ ~ m Asiffm ~ "ff ~ % 1 '3q;;;:'1crt1 -crmr~ if

!,l !fl' I a 10,oi'rolfro cm ~ "!,lGFf ~ \J1T.-J1 WTcr ~ "6 I 3ffi: ~ ~ ~<'f

fcp-m \JlTill ! I

"lffi" Lf?f °'{=faFf ~ cffl-~ 11" R1m ~ "lTllT 6 I

./

( ~o 31-@cilcf> ~ ) ~ qmo3J~, c[ffi-4

•

To,

~ ¢1~TdlJ, '3"0"!:iO~~t:10] At!.r:Qa. ~, ~ ~o 14, flcfc'< 3~, 3ITcfIB ~cblfl fficprG. ~I -ll'1'-','i1, <i1l"TRT I

I. General Manager, Yarnuna Pollution Control Unit (YPCB) lf ttar Pradesh, Agra

' t 1unicipal Commissioner, p gra

~.-J jq-, - I'-/ I CJ I ) I b

Subject: 1 nformation required in the Ho:n'ble NGT Court order dated 09.12.2015, Original application no.145 of 2015 in the matter of i) K.Joshi Vs Union Of India & Ors regarding.

Ir.

t .= bring to your kind noticed on the above referred Ho.:-:.~b le :N"GT court

·:!e r-..::>.:-;:-· 9.11.2015 on the subject-mentioned above.

Ir d c process of above order compliance, Joinr inspe ,.io:- team of offi ers

-- ,iOEF&CC CBCB and UPPCB has been conciucted the

--- "'-~ction/sampling of the effluent (inJ.et/outler ) of two TPs of distric~

--=-::- namely, Budbi Ka agla (2 .'.2Stv,ILD) & Jaganpur (14J\1LD) on

- I ~016.

- . c :- · m~pection team required information on the following point "\Vb.ether

::: · "r _cnnection when provided, whether thi:! plant would be in position to

_ ~ !e the quantum of sewage and waste" ( cop_ of I GT order enclosed).

:,. - _ .·.erefore. requested you to kindly provide detail$ information from

e-pective department on the above point at earliest, so that the joint

_ _...,~-·on -eam will submit their report before Hon'ble NGT on time i.e.,

Thanking you.

Your's faithfully,

~ . ( -· .\...J.... h~ C: 1ranJa-nS arma) ,1 Regional Officer(I/C) J .

•

Compliance report of the Order of

Hon'ble NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL dated 08.06.2015

passed in Original Application Number 145/2015

D.K. Joshi vs. Union of India and Others.

It is submitted that Hon'ble NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL was pleased to

announce an order on original application Number 145/2015 DK Joshi V/s Union of

India and Others on 08.06.15 which reads as follows:

"Report has been filed in furtherance to the order of this Tribunal dated

6.5.2015 from the report particularly the photographs filed on record it is evidently

clear that these projects would be clearly covered under the Schedule-I of the

Notification 2006. Furthermore, they are located in the flood plain area if it is taken

once in 25 years. Learned Counsel submits that demarcation of the flood plain are

is primarily duty of the Irrigation Department. However, upon instructions from the

Executive Engineer who is present before the Tribunal, Learned Counsel submits

that npne of these projects have obtained environmental clearance in terms of the

l\lotification 2006.

Let Notice be issued to all the builders specified in the report.

In the meanwhile , we restrain any further construction, occupancy or transfer

of possession of the built-up structure by the builders to any parties. They would not

further create third party interest. We direct SEIM, Agm Development Authority

and the UP Pollution Control Board to conduct a joint inspection of these buildings

in addition to the buildings which are otherwise located in the flood plain area and

submit a report before the next date of hearing.

The order of injunction shall be communicated by the Agra Development

Authority to all the builders. The Pollution Control Board shall ensure that the order

is fully implemented along with Agra Development Authority.

The 111speclion team shall also report as to the status of installation of STPs,

where the sewage is proposed to be discharged and whether the complete sewage

system has been installed. It will also be brought on record if there is any common

Page 1 of 25

STP and if any domestic or other discharge is likely to be thrown directly into the

river Yamuna in that area.

The UP Jal Nigam shall also be made party to this inspection and would

inform the Tribunal on the next date of hearing as to whether the connected

chambers have been covered and sewage system has been provided to the

complex. In the meanwhile, Irrigation Department and the UP Jal Nigam shall

together determine the flood plain and start physical demarcation by fixation of

pillars.

List this matter for hearing on 281h July, 2015."

The operative instructions given by Hon'ble NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL

which were to be complied with at various levels are underlined as follows:-

(1) Restraining any further construction, occupancy and transfer of

possession of the built-up structure by the builders to any parties and they

would not create further 3 rd party interest. The order of injunction shall be

communicated by Agra Development Authority to all builders.

(2) The UP Pollution Control Board shall ensure that the order is fully

implemented alongwith Agra Development Authority .

(3) UP Jal Nigam shall also be made party to this inspection and will inform

the Hon'ble NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL on the next date of hearing

as to whether the connecting chambers have been made and sewage

system have been provided to the complex.

(4) Irrigation dept. and UP Jal Nigam shall together determine flood plain and

start physical demarcation by fixation of pillars.

(5) The SEIM, Agra Development Authority and UP Pollution Control Board

to conduct a join inspection of these buildings, in addition to the buildings

which are otherwise located in flood plain area and submit a report by the

next date of hearing. For the joint inspection team the terms of reference

as envisaged in the order under reference is as follows:-

(i) Status of installation of sewage treatment plant.

Page 2 of 25

(ii) Where the sewage is proposed to be discharged.

(iii) Whether the complete sewerage system has been installed ?

(iv) Is there any common STP in existence ?

(v) If any domestic or other discharge is being thrown directly into the river

Yamuna?

Hereinafter the action taken report on the instructions of Hon'ble NATIONAL

GREEN TRIBUNAL is enumerated below :-

Page 3 of 25

(i) Restraining any further construction, occupancy and transfer of

possession of the built-up structure by the builders to any parties

they would not create further 3rd party interest. The order of

injunction shall be communicated by Agra Development Authority

to all builders.

In compliance with the order of Hon'ble NATIONAL GREEN

TRIBUNAL dated 8.6.2015 the order of injunction restraining any

further construction , occupancy and transfer of possession of the built

up structure by the builders to any parties as well as further prohibition

of creating third party interest has been communicated in the form of a

notice which has been served to following , by special messenger :-

1. Manglam Estate

2. Pushpanjali Seasons

3. Aparna River View

4. Manglam Shila

5. Pusphanjali Height

6. Kalyani Height

7. Rajshree Garden (Mauja-Jaganpur)

8. Vibhav Vatika

9. Radha Ballabh Public School

10. Taj View (Yamuna Kinara Road)

11 . Hotel Taj Way Inn

I

12. PG College, Village Naraich

13. Jawahar Bagh-2

14. Manglam Estate Extension

15.Ganpati Wonder City

16. Ram Mohan Vihar

17. Tanishq Rajshree Estate

18. Astha City Center

19. Indra Estate (Indra Mill Compound)

Barring 24 constructions, which have been demolished similar notices,

have been issued to remaining constructions, identified by the joint inspection

team of Irrigation dept. and Agra Development Authority in year 2013 , as to

have been built in the said flood plain area. The 34 person on whom the

notices has been served is appended below :-

SI. No. Name & Address of Building Owner

1. Mr.Rajeev Sharma Sia Mr. Damodar Upadhyay & Mr. Anand Sharma (Pandit Ji), In Deepak Chandi Wale back of Deepak Chandi Wale Farm House, Poia Ghat to Balkeshwar Road, Mauza Khaspur, Agra.

2. Mr. Mahendra Singhani , lnfront of Nagwani Farm House, Balkeshwar to Poia Ghat Road, Mauja Khaspur.

3. Mr. GP Satsangi , Secretary Housing & Neetu Saxena Radha Swami Satsang Sabha, Poia Ghat Road to Balkeshwar Ghat, Mauja Khaspur to Balkeshwar Road, Agra .

4. Mr. Raju Agarwal Sia Mr. Sukhvir Agarwal , Khushbu Namkin Factory, Old Narmedashwar Mahadev Tample, Anurag Nagar, Balkeshwar to Poia Ghat Road, Agra.

5. Mr. Sitaram Sia Mr. Nekram, Nai Basti Jaswant Vihar, Jaswant Singh Ki Chatri , lnfront of Guiab Singh Sia Nekram Home, Agra.

6. Mr. Hari & Mr. Sunil Sia Mr. Hari , Jaswant Vihar, Inside of Jaswant Singh Ki Chatri , 33117 N40111 Agra.

7. Mr. Narain Singh Sia Mr. Ghunnaram near Mevaram Sia Mr. Mangal Das, Jaswant Vihar near Jaswant Singh ki Chatri , Agra .

8. Mr. Kedar Singh Sia Mr. Nekram near Mr. Vijendra Sia Shriram Bharosi house, Jaswant Vihar near Jaswant Singh ki Chatri , Agra.

9. Mr. Ashok near Kamal Singh Sia Subedar house, Jaswant Vihar near Jaswant Singh ki Chatri , Agra.

10. Mr. Jagdish Sia Mr. Pooran Singh near Kamal Singh Sia Subedar house, Jaswant Vihar near Jaswant Singh ki Chatri , Agra.

Page 4 of 25


11 . Mr. Pappu Gupta S/o Mr. Ramprakash Gupta near Raju S/o Satyaprakash house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior School wali gali lohia nagar, balkeshwar, Agra.

12. Mr. Banwari & Mr. Tara Chand S/o Birbal , Jaswant Vihar, Jaswant Singh Ki Chatri infront of Guiab Singh S/o Nekram house, Yamuna Kinara, Agra.

13. Mr. Shivshankar S/o Munna Lal inside of Santosh Pathak S/o Shanti Swaroop Pathak house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali , Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra.

14. Mr. Santosh Pathak S/o Shanti Swaroop Pathak inside of Pappu Gupta S/o Ramprasad Gupta house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali, Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra.

15. Mr. Raju S/o Satyaprakash inside of Pappu Gupta S/o Ramprasad Gupta house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali , Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra.

16. Mr. Deepak S/o Mr. Rajkumar, H.No. 9/110 DP Enterprises, Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar area near Yamuna kinara near Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali , Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra .

17. Mr. Sanjeev Agarwal house number 121 New Radha Nagar infront of Mother Land Junior High School near Yamuna Kinara, Agra.

18. Mr. Mukhtyar & Mr. Rajendra Netaji near S/o Mr. Vishnu Dev Sharma Bachhu house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali , Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra.

19. Mr. Kalicharan S/o Mr. Ganpat infront of DP Enterprises, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali , Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra .

20. Mrs. Shashi Mittal W/o Mr. Omprakash Mittal , 332/22 New Radha Nagar, Agra.

21 . Mr. Jagdish S/o Mr. Duiaram, Radha Nagar Ki Bagichi , Ram Chand Sawre Jamindar Old Shiv Mandir, Shakya Samaj, Radha Nagar, Agra.

22. Mr. Satish S/o Mr. Jugal Kishor, 9/218 Moti Bagh , Yamuna Bridge, Agra .

23. Mr. Sevanand Ji Maharaj, Moti Bagh, Yamuna Kinara , Etmadud-daula, Agra.

24. Mr. Amir Chand & Mr. Subhash Chand Ken , Prathvi Mandir, Sabji Mandi , Yamuna Kinara, Etmad-ud-daula, Agra.

25. Mr. Nityanand Prakash, Sachhidanand , Yamuna Kinara, Yamuna Bridge, Agra.

26. Mr. Bachhu Singh S/o Mr. Dhanpal Singh, Yamuna Kinara , Moti Bagh , Agra.

27. Manager, Madyanand Anathalaya Ashram evam Dular Shishu Sadan, Moti Bagh , Yamuna Kinara, Agra.

28. Mr. Manoj Chandra, Village Nagla Talfi, Agra.

29. Mr. Swaroop Chand Jain, Village Nagla Talfi , Agra.

30. Mr. Prakhar Garg, Village Nagla Talfi , Agra.

31 . Mr. Sunil Agarwal , Village Nagla Talfi , Agra.

Page 5 of 25

1


32. Director, Rajshree Estate, Dayal Bagh, Agra.

33. Manager, Radha Ballabh Inter College Play Ground, Agra.

34. Dr. Vaibhav Sharma Tapan Farm House near Tapan Enclave, Amar Vihar, Agra.

A specimen copy of notice sent is being annexed herewith as

Annexure-1 .

(ii) The UP Pollution Control Board shall ensure that the order is

fully implemented alongwith Agra Development Authority.

It is submitted that Agra Development Authority is ensuring that the

order of Hon 'ble NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL dated 8.6.2015 is fully

implemented and no violation takes place and instructions to this

regard have been given to UP Pollution Control Board.

(iii)UP Jal Nigam shall also be made party to this inspection and will

inform the Hon'ble NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL on the next date

of hearing as to whether the connecting chambers have been

made and sewage system have been provided to the complex.

As per the orders of Hon'ble National Green Tribunal UP Jal Nigam was

made party to the joint team formed for inspection. Regarding the

information sought by Hon'ble Tribunal about connecting chambers and

provision of sewerage treatment plant, the department has informed that

it has constructed three common sewerage treatment plant in this general

area. The details are as follows :-

S. No. Name ofSTP Capacity

1. Jaganpur 14 MLD

2. Dhandhupura 78 MLD

3. Pilakhar 10 MLD

As per the report of UP Jal Nigam in the maximum area under reference,

Jal Nigam has laid sewer line which is connected to STPs but their are

certain colonies who have not connected their sewer line laid by UP Jal

Page 6 of 25

Nigam. Yamuna Pollution Control Unit, UP Jal Nigam has intimated that

to facilitate the connection of sewer line and for the efficiency, ease and

maximum participation of public, a project for the construction of house

connecting chambers has been sanctioned by Uttar Pradesh Government

wide their letter no. 175/2015-1179/9-5-15-189budget 2014/nagar vikas

anubhag-5 date 12.06.15 and they have started construction of house

connecting chambers.

(iv)lrrigation dept. and UP Jal Nigam shall together determine flood

plain and start physical demarcation by fixation of pillars.

It is submitted that as per the instructions of Hon'ble National Green

Tribunal dated 08.06.15 Irrigation department and UP Jal Nigam have

completed the determination of flood plain zone as per 1 :25 years norms

and have started the work of fixation of pillars for physical demarcation of

the same on ground.

(v) SEIAA, Agra Development Authority and UP Pollution Control

Board to conduct a joint inspection of these buildings, in addition

to buildings which are otherwise located in flood plain area and

submit a report by the next date of hearing.

Pursuant to the instruction enumerated above a joint inspection team

was formed on 16.06.15 by the order of Vice-Chairperson, Agra

Development Authority which consisted of following officials/

department.

A) Agra Development Authority , Agra

B) Nominee of Member-Secretary SEIM, UP Lucknow.

C) Chief Engineer, UP Jal Nigam, Agra .

D) Regional Officer, UP Pollution Control Board, Agra.

E) Executive Engineer, Lower Division, Agra Canal, Agra.

It was also decided that, whether the construction sites which were to be

inspected were in the flood plain zone is an important determination to be made,

Page 7 of 25

I

therefore , Irrigation department should also be included in the team. Similarly Jal

Sansthan, Nagar Nigam, Agra were also included in the joint inspection team for the

ease and efficiency of the task involved. UP Jal Nigam was also made party to this

inspection team as per the instructions of the Hon'ble NATIONAL GREEN

TRIBUNAL.

Though broad terms of reference were already illustrated in the order of the

Hon'ble NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL. For the ease of task, certain additional

terms were added and the total terms of reference of the joint inspection team were

finalized in the meeting chaired by Vice-Chairperson, Agra Development Authority

on 25.06.15 and these terms of reference are as follows:

1. Whether the project is affected by the flood plain zone of river Yamuna in

1 :25 years if yes then specify the total area affected

2. Whether the Internal sewer line has been laid?

3. Whether the Internal Sewer Line is connected to main trunk sewer line

through connecting chambers?

4. Whether sewerage treatment plant has been constructed?

5. Whether trunk sewer line is connected to STP?

6. Whether sewage is directly being discharged into Yamuna river?

7. How the solid waste is being disposed off?

8. Type of Construction whether it is a Group Housing or a Colony?

9. If it is Group Housing then whether the total covered area of building is more

than 20,000 sqm.? (Yes or No.)

10. If it is a Colony then total plot area of colony is more than 1,50,000 sqm. or

not (Yes or No.)

11 . Whether environmental clearance is needed? (Yes/No)

12. If so whether EIA clearance obtained (Yes or No.)

13. Photographs if needed?

It is pertinent to put on record that this report is regarding three categories of

constructions.

Category - A : Consist of 19 constructions as enlisted in Annexure-A of

original application and they are :

Page 8 of 25

1. Manglam Estate



4. Manglam Shila

5. Pusphanjali Height

6. Kalyani Height

7. Rajshree Garden (Mauja-Jaganpur)

8. Vibhav Vatika


10. Taj View (Yamuna Kinara Road)

11. Hotel Taj Way Inn


13. Jawahar Bagh-2

14. Manglam Estate Extension

15. Ganpati Wonder City

16. Ram Mohan Vihar

17.Tanishq Rajshree Estate

18. Astha City Center (Banjara Mall)

19. Indra Estate (Indra Mill Compound)

Category - B : Consists of 58 constructions said to be in flood plain zone as

per the survey conducted by the joint team of Irrigation Department and Agra

Development Authority in year 2013. This list is given on page no. 04 to 06 and to

avoid repetition is not being reproduced here.

Category - C : The Hon'ble NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL had also

instructed to "inspect these buildings (the listed 19 constructions covered in

Category-A), in addition to the buildings otherwise located in flood plain area". The

joint team also found following 9 constructfons nearly to the above 19 constructions

in addition to 19 constructions covered under Category-A and these are :-

Page 9 of 25

I

S.No. Name of Colony Date of Sanction

1. Vaibhav Kunj 27.03.2004

2. Sharda Vihar Phase-I 15.08.1989

3. Pushpanjali Garden 21 .09.2001

4. Nav Bharat Apartment 07.09.2002

5. Shivam Vihar 07.10.1998

6. Maitri Bagh 25.04.1 984

7. Rahul Vihar 20.10.2000

8. Krishna Colony Developed in 1947 as Refugee Colony

9. Krishna Vihar Colony Illegally Developed

It is again submitted that for the ease of assimilation and to avoid

unnecessary repetition hereinafter these construction shall be dealt under Category

A, Category-B and Category-C as defined above.

It is further submitted that individual inspection report of each construction

site/project is being annexed to this report as Annexure No.-2.

It is further submitted that during the joint inspection , all the illegally

developed colonies which were found during site visits , have been issued with

notices under relevant sections of UP Urban Planning and Development Act-1973.

The summary of the factual field/site visit status as per the questionnaire of

terms of reference given to the joint team for inspection as directed by Hon 'ble

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL in the order dated 08.06.2015, inclusive of

additional questions framed to give clarity to the issues involved is as follows :-

1. Whether The Project is affected by flood plain zone of River Yamuna

1 :25 years frequency criteria? If yes. specify the total area affected?

Category-A : Out of 19 projects only one is partially affected by flood

plain zone of once in twenty five years frequency criteria . This project is

Tanishq Rajshree .Estate. The project's total land area is 13825.75 sqm.

Page 10 of 25

I

Out of this about 2500 sqm. area is affected by flood plain zone. No other

project in Category-A is affected by flood plain zone of once in twenty five

years frequency criteria as reported by Irrigation department. It shall be

appropriate at this stage to underline and clarify that the map of Radha

Ballabh Public School was sanctioned by Agra Development Authority on

09.11 .2001 under reference no. 544/BFH/9/2001 . In the previous report

submitted before Hon'ble NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL on 8.6.2015. It

was erroneously stated that the map of this school had not been

sanctioned. This was a factual error which humbly needs rectification .

Category - B : Out of 58 constructions, the Irrigation department

intimated that 24 numbers of constructions are affected by flood plain

zone of once in twenty five years frequency criteria. These are illegal

constructions and action is being taken against them by Agra

Development Authority under relevant sections of U.P. Urban Planning &

Development Act-1973 . The constructions which have been found to be

fully/partially in flood plain zone are as under :-

SI. Name Status No. (Partially or Fully

affected)

1. Tanishq Rajshree Estate Partly Affected

2. Maa Gauri Town Partly Affected

3. Mr. Amir Chand & Mr. Subhash Chand Partly Affected Ken, Prathvi Mandir, Sabji Mandi, Yamuna Kinara, Etmad-ud-daula, Agra.

4. Mr. Bachhu Singh S/o Mr. Dhanpal Singh, Partly Affected Yamuna Kinara, Moti Bagh, Agra .

5. Manager, Madyanand Anathalaya Ashram Partly Affected evam Dular Shishu Sadan, Moti Bagh, Yamuna Kinara, Agra.

6. Mr. GP Satsangi , Secretary Housing & Fully Nee tu Saxena Rad ha Swami Satsang Sabha, Poia Ghat Road to Balkeshwar Ghat, Mauja Khaspur to Balkeshwar Road , Agra.

7. Mrs. Shashi Mittal W/o Mr. Omprakash Partly Affected Mittal, 332/22 New Radha Nagar, Agra.

8. Mr. Jagdish S/o Mr. Duiaram, Rad ha Fully

Page 11 of 25


affected)

Nagar Ki Bagichi , Ram Chand Saw re Jamindar Old Shiv Mandir, Shakya Samaj, Radha Nagar, Agra.

9. Mr. Mukhtyar & Mr. Rajendra Netaji near Partly Affected S/o Mr. Vishnu Dev Sharma Bachhu house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wal i gali, Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra.

10. Mr. Banwari & Mr. Tara Chand S/o Birbal , Partly Affected Jaswant Vihar, Jaswant Singh Ki Chatri infront of Guiab Singh S/o Nekram house, Yamuna Kinara, Agra.

11. Mr. Ashok near Kamal Singh S/o Subedar Fully house, Jaswant Vihar near Jaswant Singh ki Chatri, Agra.

12. Mr. Sitaram S/o Mr. Nekram, Nai Basti Partly Affected Jaswant Vihar, Jaswant Singh Ki Chatri, lnfront of Guiab Singh S/o Nekram Home, Agra .

13. Mrs.Kamla Paliwal W/o Mr. Vijaypal Partly Affected Paliwal , Shri Devi Trust, lnfront of Balkeshwar Mahadev Tample, Agra.

14. Mr.Babula! S/o Mr. Har Prasad, Anurag Fully Nagar, Balkeshwar to Poia Ghat Road, lnfront of Rajesh-Brijesh Bhuse ki Taal , Agra .

15. Mr. Raju Agarwal S/o Mr. Sukhvir Partly Affected Agarwal , Khushbu Namkin Factory, Old Narmedashwar Mahadev Tample, Anurag Nagar, Balkeshwar to Poia Ghat Road , Agra.

16. Mr.Loka S/o Gopali, Anurag Nagar, Partly Affected Balkeshwar to Poia Ghat Road, lnftont of Rajesh Bhuse ki Taal , Agra.

17. Dr.Kusum Gupta W/o Mr. Anupam Gupta Fully near Kusumlata Nursing Home, Akansha Test Tube Baby Center, Ram Nagar Colony, Church Road, Agra.

18. Mr. Ravi Mahajan , lnfront of Katyal Farm Fully House, Poia Ghat to Balkesh Road, Mauja Khaspur, Agra.

19. Mr.Mukul S/o Mr . . Akhilesh , Inside of Partly Affected Nagwani Farm House, Poi a Ghat to Balkeshwar Road , Mauza Khaspur, Agra.

20. Mr.Mahendra Singhani, lnfront of Nagwani Partly Affected Farm House, Balkeshwar to Poia Ghat Road, Mauja Khaspu r.

I

Page 12 of 25


affected)

21 . Mr. Kamal Chabaria, Bahadurpur to Poia Partly Affected Ghat Road, Khaspu r, Agra.

22. Mr.Alok Parik Sia Mr.R.S.Parik, Poi a Partly Affected Ghat, lnfront of Qlasi, Mokshdham, Agra

23. Mr.Rajesh Chaturvedi , Chau be Farm Partly Affected House, Khaspur, Bahadurpur, Agra.

24. Mr.Deepak Chandi Wale & Mr. Manish Partly Affected Chandi Wale, Khaspur, Bahadurpur, Agra.

Category - C : The other 9 construction sites inspected under th is

category are not affected by flood plain zone as per Irrigation Department.

2. Whether the internal sewer line has been laid ?

Category-A : Out of the 19 projects, 9 projects have complete internal

sewer lines. In the following 6 projects, there is no internal sewer line in

existence :-

S.No. Name of Colony

1. Ram Mohan Vihar

2. Jawahar Bagh Phase-2

3. Rajshree Garden

4. Astha City Center (Banjara Mall)


6. Radha Ballabh Publ ic School

It is again submitted that the developers of above 6 projects have been

issued notices to lay internal sewer line and get it connected with main

trunk sewer line, in the absence of which , to construct sewage treatment

plant within their complex in next 2 months. In the location of PG College

there is no external sewer line therefore PG College has been issued

notice to establish sewage treatment plant within their premises in next 2

months. Ram Mohan Vihar colony has been transferred to Nagar Nigam,

Agra, therefore, Nagar Nigam, Agra has been instructed to get sewerage Page 13 of 25

-1

treatment plant constructed for this colony by its own resources or by the

developer.

Two projects namely Pushpanjali Seasons and Ganpati Wonder City are

under construction. In Indra Estate colony, construction has not started.

Manglam Estate Extension has neither been sanctioned nor being

constructed. It shall be pertinent to reiterate here at the cost of repetition

that the developer of Manglam Estate Extension had constructed

boundary wall in flood plain zone of river Yamuna which was demolished

by Agra Development Authority, some remnants of which are still present

on the site.

Category - B : Out of 58 construction under this category 24

constructions have been demolished. The list of which is as follows :-

S.No. Name & Address

1. Mr.Alok Parik S/o Mr.R.S.Parik, Poia Ghat, lnfront of Qlasi , Mokshdham, Agra

2. Mr.N.N.Bajaj, Vil lage Nagla Talfi , Agra.

3. Mr.Mahajan, Village Nagla Talfi , Agra.

4 . Mr.Praveen Mohan Goyal Cement Agency, Near Rajshri Estate, Dayal Bagh, Agra.

5. Mr.Ramcharan Pandey, Near Rajshri Estate, Dayal Bagh , Agra.

6. Mr.Deepak Chandi Wale & Mr. Manish Chandi Wale, Khaspur, Bahadurpur, Agra.

7. Mr.Prakash Bhagwani , Poia Ghat to Balkeshwar Road , lnfront of Nagwani Farm House, Mauza Khaspur, Agra .

8. Mr.Rajeev Sharma S/o Mr. Damodar Prasad, back of Deepak Chandi Wale Farm House, Poia Ghat to Balkeshwar Road, Mauza Khaspur, Agra.

9. Mr.Mukul S/o Mr. Akhilesh , Inside of Nagwani Farm House, Poia Ghat to Ball<eshwar Road, Mauza Khaspur, Agra .

10. Mr.Tara Chand S/o Mr. Prem Singh, Anurag Nagar, Balkeshwar to Poia Ghat Road, Inside of Shamshan Ghat, Agra.

11 . Mr.Loka S/o Gopali, Anurag Nagar, Balkeshwar to Poia Ghat Road, lnftont of Rajesh Bhuse ki Taal, Agra.

12. Mr.Babula! S/o Mr. Har Prasad, Anurag Nagar, Balkeshwar to

Page 14 of 25

I


Poia Ghat Road, lnfront of Rajesh-Brijesh Bhuse ki Taal , Agra.

13. Mr.Rajesh Chaturvedi, Chau be Farm House, Khaspur, Bahadurpur, Agra.

14. Mr.Lakhan Singh, Guiab Nursery, Harihar Baghichi , Yamuna Kinara, Agra.

15. Mr.Tikaram Kushwah near Ganesh Nursery Etmad-ud-daula, Agra.

16. Mr. Dayaram Prajapati near Jagdamba Degree College, Shobha Nagar, Agra.

17. Mr. Shyam Prakash Bodhi near Jagdamba Degree College, Shobha Nagar. Agra.

18. Mr.Munna Lal Etawa wale near Dhar wale Sayyed back of Nandlalpur, Agra.

19. Mr. Manish Sharma near Jagdamba Degree College, Shobha Nagar, Agra.

20. Mr. Ravi Mahajan, lnfront of Katya! Farm House, Poia Ghat to Balkesh Road, Mauja Khaspur, Agra.

21. Mr. Kamal Chabaria, Bahadurpur to Poia Ghat Road, Khaspur, Agra .

22. Dr.Kusum Gupta W/o Mr. Anupam Gupta near Kusumlata Nursing Home, Akansha Test Tube Baby Center, Ram Nagar Colony, Church Road, Agra.

23. Mrs.Kamla Paliwal W/o Mr. Vijaypal Paliwal , Shri Devi Trust, lnfront of Balkeshwar Mahadev Tample, Agra .

24. Mr.Gyasiram S/o Mr. Gangaram, Anurag Nagar, Balkeshwar Poia Ghat Road, Agra.

Out of remaining 34, one site , namely Maa Gauri Town is a project of

row-housing in which internal sewer line is mandatory but at site internal

sewer line was not found. The se.wage was found being disposed off in a

septic tank whose over-flow is being discharged into river Yamuna via

drain by the side of road. Maa Gauri Town colony has been developed

illegally. Against this illegal construction action under relevant sections of

UP Urban Planning and Development Act-1973 is being taken and

demolition order has been passed by competent authority . Action against

this illegal colony is proposed to be carried out shortly as per rules.

Pa ge 15 of 25

Out of remaining 3.3 constructions six constructions have been raised

before the establishment of Agra Development Authority and they are as

follows :-

S.No. Name and Address

1. Mr. Satish S/o Mr. Jugal Kishor, 9/218 Moti Bagh, Yamuna

Bridge, Agra.

2. Mr. Sevanand Ji Maharaj, Moti Bagh, Yamuna Kinara, Etmad-

ud-daula, Agra.

3. Mr. Amir Chand & Mr. Subhash Chand Ken, Prathvi Mandir,

Sabji Mandi , Yamuna Kinara, Etmad-ud-daula, Agra.

4. Mr. Nityanand Prakash, Sachhidanand, Yamuna Kinara,

Yamuna Bridge, Agra.

5. Mr. Bachhu Singh S/o Mr. Dhanpal Singh , Yamuna Kinara , Moti

Bagh, Agra .

6. Manager, Madyanand Anathalaya Ashram evam Dular Shishu

Sadan , Moti Bagh, Yamuna Kinara, Agra.

For above mentioned six constructions , the Irrigation Department, Agra

has been requested to take action as per Canal and Drainage Act-1873.

The remaining 27 constructions are either in the form of farm houses or

they consist of one or two rooms as single dwelling unit and the rest of

the area is open. In such constructions, internal sewer line is not required .

All these 27 constructions are illegal whose map has not been sanctioned

by Agra Development Authority and they have been issued notices under

relevant sections of UP Urban Planning and Development Act-1973 and

demolition order has also been passed. Proceedings will be completed as

per rules shortly. The list of such constructions in respect of which

demolition order has been passed by competent authority and which are

likely to be proceeded against very shortly are us under:-


1. Mr. Rajeev Sharma S/o Mr. Damodar Upadhyay & Mr. Anand Sharma (Pandit Ji), In Deepak Chandi Wale back of Deepak Chandi Wale Farm House, Poia Ghat to Balkeshwar Road, Mauza Khaspur, Agra.

2. Mr. GP Satsangi, Secretary Housing & Neetu Saxena Radha Swami Satsang Sabha, Poia Ghat Road to Balkeshwar Ghat, Mauja Khaspur to Balkeshwar Road, Agra.

Page 16 of 25

I


3. Mr. Raju Agarwal S/o Mr. Sukhvir Agarwal , Khushbu Namkin Factory, Old Narmedashwar Mahadev Tample, Anurag Nagar, Balkeshwar to Poia Ghat Road, Agra.

4. Mr. Sitaram S/o Mr. Nekram, Nai Basti Jaswant Vihar, Jaswant Singh Ki Chatri , lnfront of Guiab Singh S/o Nekram Home, Agra.

5. Mr. Hari & Mr. Sunil S/o Mr. Hari , Jaswant Vihar, Inside of Jaswant Singh Ki Chatri, 33/17 A/40/11 Agra.

6. Mr. Narain Singh S/o Mr. Ghunnaram near Mevaram S/o Mr. Mangal Das, Jaswant Vihar near Jaswant Singh ki Chatri , Agra.

7. Mr. Kedar Singh S/o Mr. Nekram near Mr. Vijendra S/o Shriram Bharosi house, Jaswant Vihar near Jaswant Singh ki Chatri , Agra .

8. Mr. Ashok near Kamal Singh S/o Subedar house, Jaswant Vihar near Jaswant Singh ki Chatri, Agra.

9. Mr. Jagdish S/o Mr. Pooran Singh near Kamal Singh S/o Subedar house, Jaswant Vihar near Jaswant Singh ki Chatri , Agra.

10. Mr. Pappu Gupta S/o Mr. Ramprakash Gupta near Raju S/o Satyaprakash house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior School wali gali lohia nagar, balkeshwar. Agra.

11 . Mr. Banwari & Mr. Tara Chand S/o Birbal , Jaswant Vihar, Jaswant Singh Ki Chatri infront of Guiab Singh S/o Nekram house, Yamuna Kinara, Agra.

12. Mr. Shivshankar S/o Munna Lal inside of Santosh Pathak S/o Shanti Swaroop Pathak house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali , Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra.

13. Mr. Santosh Pathak S/o Shanti Swaroop Pathak inside of Pappu Gupta S/o Ramprasad Gupta house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wal i gali , Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra.

14. Mr. Raju S/o Satyaprakash inside of Pappu Gupta S/o Ramprasad Gupta house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali, Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra.

15. Mr. Deepak S/o Mr. Rajkumar, H.No. 9/110 DP Enterprises, Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar area near Yamuna kinara near Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali , Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra.

16. Mr. Sanjeev Agarwal house number 121 New Radha Nagar infront of Mother Land Junior High School near Yamuna Kinara , Agra .

17. Mr. Mukhtyar & Mr. Rajendra Netaji near S/o Mr. Vishnu Dev Sharma Bachhu house, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali , Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra.

18. Mr. Kalicharan S/o Mr. Ganpat infront of DP Enterprises, Shri Chunni Lal Junior High School wali gali , Lohia Nagar, Balkeshwar, Agra .

Page 17 of 25


19. Mrs. Shashi Mittal W/o Mr. Omprakash Mittal, 332/22 New Radha Nagar, Agra.

20. Mr. Jagdish S/o Mr. Duiaram, R3dha Nagar Ki Bagichi, Ram Chand Sawre Jamindar Old Shiv Mandir, Shakya Samaj, Radha Nagar, Agra.

21. Mr. Manoj Chandra, Village Nagla Talfi , Agra .

22. Mr. Swaroop Chand Jain, Village Nagla Talfi , Agra.

23. Mr. Prakhar Garg, Village Nagla Talfi, Agra .

24. Mr. Sunil Agarwal , Village Nagla Talfi, Agra.

25. Director, Rajshree Estate, Dayal Bagh, Agra.

26. Manager, Radha Ballabh Inter College Play Ground, Agra.

27. Dr. Vaibhav Sharma Tapan Farm House near Tapan Enclave, Amar Vihar, Agra.

Category - C : Of the 9 projects covered under this category , 3 projects

have internal sewer lines. The remaining 6 colonies/projects where

internal sewer line is missing are as follows :-

S.No. Name Date of Action Taken Sanction

1. Vaibhav Kunj 27.03.2004 Notice to make STP issued.

2. Shivam Vihar 07.10.1998 Transferred to Nagar Nigam, Agra .

3. Maitri Bagh 25.04.1984 Notice to make STP issued.

4. Rahul Vihar 20.10.2000 Transferred to Nagar Nigam, Agra.

5. Krishna Colony Develop as UP Pollution Control refugee Board has been colony instructed to take

before the suitable action. ADA came

in existence.

6. Krishna Vihar Colony Illegal Notice under relevant co lony sections of UP Urban

Planning and Development Act-1973

issued.

Among 6 colonies enumerated above, 2 colonies, namely Shivam Vihar

and Rahul Vihar have been transferred to Nagar Nigam, Agra for

maintenance. As such Nagar Nigam, Agra has been instructed to put

Page 18 of 25

sewage treatment plant in place, for these colonies either by their own

resources or by the developers. Two colonies namely Krishna Colony and

Krishna Vihar Colony have been found discharging their sewage directly

into river Yamuna. Out of these 2 colonies one Krishna Vihar colony is

illegally developed and Krishna colony was developed for Refugee before

existence of Agra Development Authority. Action against Krishna Vihar

colony under section 27 of UP Urban Planning and Development Act-

1973 has been initiated. UP Pollution Control Board has been directed to

take action against Krishna Colony. The developer of balance 2 colonies,

namely Vaibhav Kunj and Maitri Bagh who have not laid internal sewer

line, have been given notice to construct sewage treatment plant in next

two months.

3. Has sewer line been connected to trunk sewer line through

connecting chambers?

Category - A : Out of 19 projects following 6 are connected with trunk

sewer line :-

S.No. Name of Colony

1. Manglam Shila

2. Pushpanjali Height

3. Kalyani Height


5. Manglam Estate

6. Hotel Taj Way Inn

Two projects, namely, Vibhav Vatika and Taj View Apartment on the

Yamuna Kinara Road have laid internal sewer line but are not connected

to the trunk sewer line. They have been given notices to get their internal

sewer line, connected to the trunk sewer line. Two projects namely

Pushpanjali Seasons and Ganpati Wonder City are under construction . In

Indra Estate colony construction has not started. Manglam Estate

Extension has neither been sanctioned nor is being constructed. Tanishq

Raj Shree Estate has internal sewer line but is not connected to main

trunk sewer line. They have a 'sub-standard sewerage treatment plant

Page 19 of 25

I

which is not as per norms. UP Pollution Control Board has issued notice

to the promoters of Tanishq Rajshree Estate for installation of sewerage

treatment plant as per standards and connect it to main trunk sewer line.

Remaining 6 projects have no internal sewer line. They have been issued

notices to get internal sewer line laid and get it connected to trunk sewer

line, in the absence of which, they have been instructed to construct

sewage treatment plant in next 2 month.

Category - B : Out of 58 constructions 24 have been demolished the list

of which already been mentioned on page no. 17-19 and to avoid

repetition it is not being reproduced here. Remaining 34 construction sites

do not have sewer line and they have not been connected to trunk sewer

line. These are illegal constructions and action shall be taken against

them under relevant provision of the UP Urban Planning and

Development Act-1973. They are also scheduled to be demolished

shortly as per rules .

Category - C : The 9 projects under this category have no internal sewer

line and as such they are not connected to trunk sewer line through

connecting chambers. Out of 9 colonies, 7 colonies are sanctioned

colonies of Agra Development Authority and 1 colony was develop8d

before the existence of Agra Development Authority and 1 has been

developed illegally. The 1 colony , Krishna Vihar colony , developed

illegally has been dealt with under section 2'7 of UP Urban Planning and

Development Act-1973. Krishna colony is old refugee colony developed in

1947 and UP Pollution Control Board has been instructed to take action

to ensure that pollution does not take place. Colonisers of 3 colonies

namely Sharda Vihar Phase-I, Pushpanjali Garden and Nav Bharat

Apartment, where internal sewer lines exist, but the same has not been

connected to the trunk sewer line, have been issued notices to get the

connections in the main trunk sewer line by the Agra Development

Authority. Two colonies namely Shivam Vihar and Rahul Vihar have

Page 20 of 25

already been transferred to Nagar Nigam, Agra for maintenance.

Therefore Nagar Nigam, Agra has been instructed to get sewage

treatment plant in these colonies in place either by their own resources or

by the developers. Colonisers of Vaibhav Kunj has been issued notice to

lay internal sewer line and get it connected to trunk sewer line, in absence

of which , they have been instructed to construct sewage treatment plant

in next two months. Remaining , Maitri Bagh colony has the facility of

septic tank for individual buildings. This colony was developed in the year

1984 when there was no provision of internal sewer line and sewage

treatment plant in the agreement made between Agra Development

Authority, Agra and developer. Therefore Yamuna Pollution Control Unit

of UP Jal Nigam has been requested to ensure laying of internal sewer

line in the colony.

4. Is sewage being discharged directly in River Yamuna?

Category - A : As stated before, barring 6 projects which have internal

sewer line, and are connected to trunk sewer line, the following projects

are using septic tank whose overflow is being discharge directly in River.

Yamuna.

1. Rajshree Garden (Mauja Jagaripur)


3. PG College (Mauza Naraich)

4. Jawahar Bagh-2

Projects mentioned at s.no.1 and 2 have been issued notices to connect

their inter sewer lines to trunk sewer lines and projects mentioned at s.no.

3 and 4 have been issued notices to get sewerage treatment plant made

within two months.

The Septic tank overflow of 3 projects namely Taj View on Yamuna

Kinara Road, Ram Mohan Vihar and Astha City Centre is being

discharged in the drain (nala) which is connected to sewerage treatment

plant. Ram Mohan Vihar colony was sanctioned in 1990 when there was

no provision of sewer line and sewerage treatment plant in the agreement

Page 21 of 25

between Agra Development Authority and developer. therefore for laying

of internal sewer line Yauma Pollution Control Unit of UP Jal Nigam has

been requested for the same. Taj View developer has been issued notice

to ensure connection to main trunk sewer line. Astha City Center is bEiing

given notice to make sewerage treatment plant within two months. During

inspection it was found out that in Vibhav Vatika complex there is

common septic tank for each buildings and the overflow of the septic tank

is being utilized for maintenance of park. Same is the case in Tanishq Raj

Shree Estate, where sewerage treatment plant is constructed and its

overflow is used for park. For both these projects UP Pollution Control

Board has intimated that the sewerage treatment plant constructed is not

as per standards. Accordingly UP Pollution Control Board has been

directed that they should initiate action against the promoter of these

projects under relevant provisions of Water (Pollution , Prevention &

Control) Act-1974. Pushpanjali Seasons, Ganpati Wonder City are under

construction and work has not started in Indra _Estate, whereas Manglam

Estate Extension has not been sanctioned by Agra Development

Authority, Agra .

Category - B : Barring 24 sites out of 58 which have been demolished ,

the outflow of septic tank of remaining sites is being discharged directly in

River Yamuna as enumerated before. These illegal constructions have

been dealt with under relevant section of U.P. Planning & Development

Act-1973 and demolition orders in respect of all these constructions have

been passed by competent authority. These illegal constructions shall be

proceeded against as per rules shortly. The list of all these constructions

has already been appended on page no. 20 to 22.

Category - C : The 9 sites covered in this category were inspected and

their drainage and sewerage is been disposed off by septic tank whose

overflow is being discharged in River Yamuna through S.W. Drain . The

inspection team also found out certain residential colonies where there is

Page 22 of 25

neither internal sewer line nor septic tank and their sewerage is being

disposed off in River Yamuna directly these colonies are:

1. Krishna Colony

2. Krishna Vihar Colony

Out of these colonies Krishna Colony has been developed in year 1947

as a refugee colony, whereas Krishna Vihar Colony has been illegally

developed and procedure under relevant section of U.P. Urban Planning

& Development Act-1973 has been started against it. UP Pollution Control

Board has been instructed to take action against Krishna colony .

Remaining 7 colonies are sanctioned colonies of Agra Development

Authority. Out of these 7, 3 colonies namely Sharda Vihar Phase-I ,

Pushpanjali Garden, Nav Bharat Apartment have internal sewer line laid

but have not been connected to trunk sewer line. The developers of these

three projects have been issued ,notices by Agra Development Authority

to build their internal sewer line and get it connected to trunk sewer line.

Remaining 2 colonies namely Shivam vihar and Rahul Vihar have been

handed over to Nagar Nigam, Agra , as such Nagar Nigam, Agra has

been directed to get sewerage treatment plant constructed for these

colonies by their own resources or by the developers. Maitri Bagh colony

was sanctioned in 1984 when there was no provision of internal sewer

line and sewerage treatment plant in the agreement between Agra

Development Authority and Developer. Therefore Yamuna Pollution

Control Unit of UP Jal Nigam has been requested to ensure internal

sewer line in this colony. Vaibhav Kunj has been issued notice by Agra

Development Authority to build sewerage treatment plant within two

months.

5. How is the solid waste being disposed off?

Category - A : The residents of these projects deposit the solid waste of

their colonies/apartments in dustbins provided by Nagar Nigam, Agra. The

Page 23 of 25

Nagar Nigam, Agra empties these dustbins in their tipper trucks and

disposes their solid waste on its landfill site at Kuberpur.

Category - B : The solid waste of these sites is disposed of on the nearest

vacant land which is collected by Nagar Nigam, Agra. The solid waste of

'Maa Gauri Town' colony is disposed off in the dustbins of Nagar Nigam,

Agra.

Category - C : The solid waste of colonies under these categories is

disposed off in the dustbins provided by Nagar Nigam, Agra . From time to

time Nagar Nigam Agra empties these dustbins in their tipper trucks and

disposes it at their landfill site at Kuberpur.

6. Whether environmental clearance/sanction is required ?

Category - A : Under this category there are 05 projects, whose 1.otal

covered area is more than 20,000 sqm. As per the notification of September

2006 of the Government of India, any project having total area more than

20,000 sqm. environmental clearance/sanction from SEIM in the form of EIA

is essential. Only one developer of the project namely 'Astha City Centre' has

got the environmental clearance. Rest 04 developers who need to have

environmental clearances/sanction but have not got it are as follows :--

S.No. Name Status of Environmental Clearance

1 Aparna Rrver vrew Apartment App!ied for. --

2 Pushpanjali Seasons Applied for .

3 Pushpanjali Heights Applied for.

4 Mangalam Shila Not applied so for. __J

All the above construction site have been completely/partially sealed

under the relevant provision of U.P. Urban Planning & Development Act-

1973. During the inspection of joint team it was found that the four projects

were sealed and there was no construction activity going on.

Page 24 of 25

-(b) Out of 58 constructions which were said to be in Flood Plain Zone, 22

constructions have been demolished. Out of 36 remaining constrnctions , the covered area is not exceeding the limit of 20,000 sqm. area. !herefore, no environmental clearance 1s required.

(c) Other colonies/residential area which were inspected by the joint team , there 1s no requirement of EIA clearance

7- Has Environmental Clearance J sanction obtained?

(a} Out of 5 projects where EIA clearance was required only one project namely 'Ashtha City Centre' has been given environmental clearance. The developer of Manglam Shila has not yet app lied for Environmental Clearance in SEIM. Remaining 3 developers who have app lied For environmental clearance, are as follows-

-1. Aparna River View

2 . Pushpanjali Height


{b) The remaining 36 constructions do not require environmental clearance

(c) The other colonies/ residential areas inspected by the joint team do not

require environmental clearance as per the norms.

~ 1-( V.P. Singh)

Junior Engineer AD.A. , Agra

~ { Satish Rajput) Junior Engineer

A.D.A. , Agra

~ ( N.K.Chaudhary ) Executive Engineer

AD.A. , Agra --, ( Raj~thi)

Environmental Engineer Nagar Nigam , Agra

(Sharad Kfa!Qr Singh) Executiv~ij~~ineer

Lower Division, Agra Canal, Agra

~ ( Uctaiver s'fiigh ) Junior Engineer

A.DA , Agra

\ ['\_ (:\'f._; ~

( K.P. Singh) Junior Engineer

A.D.A. , Agra

(_~--( Rajeev Dixit )

Executive Engineer A.DA . Agra

~. \ ___-tvv~~

( Chandrashekhar) Asst. Project Engineer

Yarnuna Pollution Control Unit,

UP Jal)N,.i ~111 , A~1-·~

rt . ___ _ ( Niranj:fr:Sharma ) Asst. Env. Engineer UP Pollution Control'

Board, Agra

~ -7

(Soni) Junior Engineer

A.DA , Agra

{ Jagdi~adav) Dy. Secretary(First)

A.D.A. , f\CJra ::.ll~ C1n¥

( Shivraj Singh ) Chief Engineer A.DA, Agra

(v-( P.K. Shrivastava)

Project Engineer Yarnuna Pollution

Control Unit, UP Jal Nigam. Agra

~-\~ a,,....,. /h.. · ·1· 1.'i

C. S( Vidyottma tsnarti ) Asst. Director Directorate of

Environment, UP .Mee rut

( Brijendra Singh ) Junior Engineer

A.DA, Agra

Cvw( ( La Singl1J

Asst. Engineer:! Lower Division, Agra

Canal , Agra

.L /,,. n

''---- .J (Vijay Bahadur Sin£th)

Executive Engineer Jall<al Vibhag, Agra

1

up pollution control board, lucknow - inspection report of stps … · 2016-04-13 · • to...

Documents