universiti putra malaysia a study of perceived...

25
UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA A STUDY OF PERCEIVED MANAGERIAL COMPETENCIES IN THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE AMY YEO CHU MAY GSM 1999 43

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  •  

    UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA

    A STUDY OF PERCEIVED MANAGERIAL COMPETENCIES IN THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE

    AMY YEO CHU MAY

    GSM 1999 43

  • A STUDY OF PERCEIVED MANAGERIAL COMPETENCIES IN THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE

    By

    AMY YEO CHU MAY

    Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the

    Malaysian Graduate School of Management

    Universiti Putra Malaysia

    May 1999

  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    In completing this thesis, I have been greatly aided by many individuals to

    whom I own a debt of gratitude. First and foremost, many thanks due to my

    Supervisor, Dr. Nurol'ain Mustapha. She has been exceptionally understanding

    especially towards the way I managed my thesis. She was particularly patient during

    the times when I was "silent" about the progress of my thesis. But above all, I knew

    she would be there when I needed her advice. And indeed, I am very grateful that she

    did not give up on me as her student.

    I am also especially grateful to Associate Professor Dr. Md. Zabid Abdul

    Rashid and Associate Professor Dr. Samsinar Md. Sidin for their invaluable advice,

    comments and for being so caring and thoughtful throughout.

    I deeply appreciate the wonderful support that I have received from managers

    in the five participating companies. This thesis certainly would not be complete

    without acknowledging the sponsorship of Tunku Abdul Rahman College. All others

    whom I may not have mentioned but who have helped me in one way or another. I

    hope they will forgive me if I do not attempt to mention them by name.

    11

  • Last but not the least, I wish to express my deepest appreciation to my

    husband and my two children for their tolerance and valuable support throughout my

    study especially during the preparation of this thesis.

    III

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Page

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

    LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . , ... ... ... . , . ... ...... ... ... . ,. '" .. , ... ... ... ... . , . .. , ... ... . Vll

    LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . ......... ...... ... ......... ... ... ........ , ... IX

    LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . , . .. , .. , ... ... ... ... .. , ... . . . ...... . ,. ... ... ... ... X

    ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Xl

    ABSTRAK .. . . . . . . . . , . ... ... ... ... ... . , . ... .. , ... '" '" '" ... .. , ... ... '" ... ... .. , ....... XlV

    CHAPTER

    I INTRODUCTION Background .. . . .. '" ... ... ... ... .. , ... ... ... ... ... .. , ...... ... . , . ..... , ... .. . .. . ... 1 Problem Statement. . . . . . . . . . . , ......... '" ... ......... .... , . ................ , ... .. 3

    The Scenario of the World Telecommunications Industry .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . ...... ... ....... , . . , . .. , '" ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ....... 3 The Scenario of the Malaysian Telecommunications Industry . . . . . . .. . . , . ... ... ... '" ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . ,. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... 6

    Objectives of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . ... .. , ... ... ... . , . . , . .. , ...... '" . .. ... . . . . 11 Conceptual Framework ........ . ... ... '" .. , ... . .. ..... ... . .. . ... ... . . .. ... . .. ... 11 Hypotheses of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . , ... '" ...... ..... , ... ... '" ... . .. ... 19 The Importance of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '" ....... , . ... ... ... '" ........ ,. ... 23 Assumptions of the Study . . . . . . '" ......... ........... , ....... .......... , . .. , .. , . 24 Organisation of the Thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ...... '" .... ,. ... . . . . 24

    n LITERATURE REVIEW Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ...... .............. , ... ... .... , . .. , .. , ... '" .. . . .. .. 26 Defining Competencies . .. .. . . . . . , ... , ... ... ... . , . . ,. ... ... ....... ... ... ... ... ... 26

    Concept of 'Soft Competence' and Threshold Competence . . . . . . . , ....... ... ............ ... ............. ... ..... , 32

    IV

  • PfRPVSTAKAAN SULTAN ABDUL SAMAt UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA

    Managerial Skills and Competency ...... ... . .. ....... . . , ...... ... . ,. '" ... . . . . 34 Managerial Roles and Competency... ... ... ....... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 39 Personal Qualities, Attitude and Value Position ... ......... ... ... '" ... ..... 40 Organisational Climate and Culture... ............... ......... ...... ...... .... 42 Generic Competence versus Specific Competence...... ... ... ...... ... ..... 43

    Proponents of Generic Competencies...... ... ... ......... ............ ... 43 Proponents of Specific Competencies...... ... ..... . ...... ... . .. . .. ..... 44 Proponents of Generic Competencies and Specific Competencies... ............ ...... ...... ......... ... .............. 46

    Competency Groupings... ...... ......... ... ...... ... ... ......... ....... ... ... ... 47 Summary... ... ......... ..................... ...... ...... ...... ......... ... ...... ... 53

    m RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

    Introduction ......... '" ... ... .............. , ... ... ... . ,. ... ... ... ... ... .... ... .... 56 Quantitative Research Methodology.. . . . . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . .. . .. ... 56 Selection of Companies... .... .. ... ...... ......... ... ...... ...... ....... ... ...... 57

    Location of the Companies......... ............... ......... ... ... ...... .... 58 Research Questionnaire ... ................ ... ........ , ...... ... . ,. ... ... ... ... ... 59 Sampling Procedure... .. . .. . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . .. . .. ... ... .. . ... ... . .. . .. ... .. 60

    Telekom Malaysia Berhad ... ........ , ... ... ... . , . ... . ,. ... ... .... ... ... .... 61 DiGi Telecommunications Sdn Bhd.. . .. . ... .. . ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... .. 62 Celcom (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd ...... ... ..... ' ...... ...... .... , . .. .. ... ... .. . .. 62 Binariang Berhad...... ......... ... ............... ......... ....... ...... ..... 63 Time Telecommuncations Sdn Bhd... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... .. . . .. .. 63

    Procedure for Data Collection ........... , ... .. , ... ... ... . , ........ ........ , . .. . 65 Statistical Analysis Procedure ... ...... .. . ..... , ... ... ... . ,. ... ... ... ... ... ..... 66 The Reliability of the Instrument... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . 69

    Pre-reliability Measures... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. 69 Post-reliability Measures... ............ ...... ... ... ... ...... ...... ... ...... 70 Reliability Test for Ninety-One Competency Elements... ... ... . . . . .. . 70 Reliability Test for Twenty-Three Variables and the Five Factors ... ... ...... ... ...... ... ........... . '" . ... . . . . ... . . " . . . . . . . . . 71

    Validity of the Instrument. .. ............. .. ...... '" ., . ....... ... ..... , ..... , ... 72 Validity Test for Twenty-Three Elements and the Five Factors... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . 73

    IV DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION Introduction ... ........ , ... ... .... , .......... ... '" ... ...... .. , ... .. , ...... ... ..... . Profile of the Respondents ... ............... ............ .......... ... ... . , . .... .. Organisation's Characteristics ... ...... ... '" ......... ................. , ... ... ..

    v

    79 83 86

  • Hypothesis 1: Managers do not Perceive Generic Competencies to be Necessary in Carrying Out their Jobs . . . . . . . . . . . , ...... ... ... . , .... ... .. , 89 Emergence of Meaningful Dimensions/Structure from the List of Perceived Managerial Competencies . .. . . . . . . . . , ... '" ...... ... ... ... .... " ... . 91 Hypothesis 2: There is no Significant Variation of Competency Elements across Managerial Levels .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , ... . .. . .. ... .. 95 Hypothesis 3: There is no Significant Variation of Competency Elements across Functional Areas . . . . . , ...... ... ... . , .... ..... , 99 Hypothesis 4: There is no Significant Variation of Competency Elements between Organisations within the Industry... ..... 103 Interpretation and Discussion of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . , . ........ , ... ... 107

    Perceived Importance of Managerial Competencies . . . . " ., . . , . .. , .. , ... 107 Five Dimensions of Managerial Competencies . . . . . . . .. . . . . , . ... ... ... .... 108 Variation across Managerial Levels .. , .. , ... '" .... , .. , . .. , .... ... .. , ... ... . 113 Variation across Functional Areas . . . .. . . . . . . . . . , ...... ......... ... .. , .. , '" 114 Variation across the Participating Companies in the Industry . . . '" .... 116

    v SUMMARY, CONTRIBUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    Introduction . . . . . . .. . . .. .. , .. , ............... ...... '" ... ......... ... .. , .. , ... ... ... 119 Summary of Main Findings ... .. , ......... .... , . .. , ... '" ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. 119 Limitations of the Study .. . '" .... , .... ......... ... .... , . . , .... .. , ... ... ... ... ... 124

    Generalizability of the Findings . .. . . .... . . . . . , ... ... ... ............ ... ..... 124 Sample Size . . . . . . '" ...... . , . .. , ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 125 Methods of Data Collection . .. . . . ... . .. . . . '" ... . , . ..... , ... '" ... ... ... ... 125

    Contributions of the Study . .. . . . . . . . . , ... ... ...... . , .. , ... , ......... '" ... ... ... 126 Recommendations for Further Studies ... . . . . . . . . , ... '" ... ... ... ... ... ........ 128

    BmLIOGRAPBY... ... .. ... . ... ... . . . ............ ............... ......... ... ........... 131

    APPENDICES A A Sample of Questionnaire on Managerial Competencies

    (In English) . . . .... . . . .. . . . . .. . . , '" '" ...... ...... .. , '" '" ... ... . , . . , . ... 144 B A Sample of Letter from UPM to have Access

    to the Organisations A Sample of Internal Letter / Memo for Circulation to Respondents . . . . .. . . . . . . . , ....... ... ...... ... . , . . , . ...... '" '" ... ... . , 153

    C A List of Local Telecommunications Operators... . . . ... ...... ..... 158 D Corporate Information of the Five Telecommunications

    Companies .. . . . . . . . . . , ...... .............. , ... '" ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... 161

    VITA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... 172

    VI

  • Table

    Table 1.1

    Table 1.2

    Table 2.1

    Table 3.1

    Table 3.2

    Table 3.3

    Table 3.4

    Table 3.5

    Table 3.6

    Table 3.7

    Table 3.8

    Table 4.1

    Table 4.2

    Table 4.3

    LIST OF TABLES

    Title Page

    Managerial Competency Elements ... ...... ... ...... . ..... .. , .. . . .. . 15

    Conceptual Framework for Managerial Competencies... . .. ... ... 18

    Personal Effectiveness: The MCI Model ..... , ......... ... . ,. ... ... 50

    Sample Distribution of Respondents by Managerial Levels in the Five Companies ... . , . ... ... .. , ...... ...... . ,. ... ... ..... 64

    Responded Samples by Managerial Levels in the Five Companies . .. ... ..... , ... ........ ... ... ... ........ , ... . ,. ... ... ... . 64

    Reliability Analysis on Competency Elements .... ,. ... ... ... ... ... 72

    Mean, Standard Deviation and Intercorrelation of Problem Solving Variables ...... .. , ... ... ... ... . , .......... ... ... .. , ... 74

    Mean, Standard Deviation and Intercorrelation of Personal Management Variables ... ... '" .. , ... ...... '" ... ... ... ..... 75

    Mean, Standard Deviation and Intercorrelation of Communication and Integrity Variables ...... ... ... . .. .. , ... ... ..... 76

    Mean, Standard Deviation and Intercorrelation of Organisation Knowledge Variables ... '" ... .... , .... .... ,. ... ... .... 76

    Mean, Standard Deviation and Intercorrelation of Image and Direction Variables ... ........... , ... ... .. , ... ... ... ... . ,. 77

    Five Participating Telecommunications Companies . .... . ... ... '" 81

    Summary of the Financial Ratios of the Five Companies as at 31 5t December 1997 ... ... ..... , .... , . ... ...... '" ... ... . . . . . . ... . 82

    Demographic Characteristics ...... ..... , .... , . ... ...... ............. , 85

    Vll

  • Table 4.4 Frequency Distribution for Type of Entity, Number of Employees and Ownership... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..... 87

    Table 4.5 Crosstab of the Five Companies and the Level of CompetItIveness ... ... ... '" ... ... ... ... ... '" ... ... ... ... .. , ... ... ... ... 88

    Table 4.6 Competency Rankings in Descending Rank Order ... . ,. ... ... ..... 90

    Table 4.7 Five Factors Structure of Managerial Competencies...... ... ...... 92

    Table 4.8 A Five Competency Groupings derived from the Factor Analysis Results............ ... ... ... ............... ............... ...... 96

    Table 4.9 Competencies across Managerial Levels ... .... , ... , ... . , . .. , ... .... 97

    Table 4.10 Competencies across Functional Areas... ...... ...... ... ... ... ... ... 101

    Table 4.11 Competencies across Five Telecommunications Companies ... .. , ...... ... ... ... .. , ... ... ... ...... ... ........ , .... ,. .. . . .. 104

    Table 4.12 Competency Groupings... .......... .. ...... ...... ............ .......... 110

    Vlll

  • Figure

    Figure 1 .1

    Figure 2.1

    Figure 2.2

    Figure 2.3

    Figure 2.4

    Figure 2.5

    Figure 5.1

    LIST OF FIGURES

    Title Page

    Foreign Equity in local Telecommunications Companies... ... .... 8

    Human Competence in the fonn of an 'Iceberg'... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

    Competence Model... ... ... ... .. . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. . . .. . .. ... ... 35

    Whetten and Cameron's Nine Critical Management Skills... ... ... 37

    Competence at different levels . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

    Generic Managerial Competences... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1

    A Model for Managerial Competencies... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 22

    IX

  • AMA

    CEO

    CMED

    GDP

    HRD

    KLSE

    MCI

    MIM

    MSC

    WTO

    NFMED

    ROC

    ROI

    LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

    American Management Associat ion

    Chief Executive Officer

    Council for Management Education and Development

    Gross Domestic Product

    Human Resource Department

    Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange

    Management Charter Initiative

    Malaysian Institute of Management

    Multimedia Super Corridor

    World Trade Organisation

    National Forum for Management Education and Development

    Registrar of Companies

    Return On Investment

    x

  • ABSTRACT

    Abstract of thesis presented to the Senate ofUniversiti Putra Malaysia in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.

    A STUDY OF PERCEIVED MANAGERIAL COMPETENCIES IN THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE

    By

    AMY YEO CHU MAY

    May 1999

    Chairperson Dr. NuroI'ain Mustapha, Ph.D.

    Faculty Malaysian Graduate School of Management

    This study was conducted with the aim of providing an insight into the

    competency study from the Malaysian point of view, in general, and

    telecommunication industry, in particular. Specifically, it is the objective of this study

    to identify a list of competency elements and to determine whether they are necessary

    or important for manager� to perform their managerial jobs.

    Four hypotheses were formulated to achieve the objectives of the study. The

    four hypotheses were: 1) Managers do not perceive generic competencies to be

    necessary in carrying out their jobs, 2) There is no significant variation of competency

    elements across managerial levels, 3) There is no significant variation of competency

    Xl

  • elements across functional areas, 4) There is no significant variation of competency

    elements across organisations in the industry.

    Data for this study has been collected primarily through structured

    questionnaires. The ninety-one competency elements used in this study were based on

    the questionnaire developed by Hunt and Wallace ( 1997). Analysis of the data was

    performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). Several statistical

    tools such as descriptive analysis, factor analysis, analysis of variance and bonferroni

    post-hoc multiple comparison were used to analyse the data. The major findings are as

    follows:

    Using descriptive analysis, the mean score for the ninety-one competency

    elements were ranked according to descending order. The findings indicated that

    managers perceived all the ninety- one competency elements as necessary for them to

    perform their jobs. Of the nine-one competency elements, more than 80% of the

    elements were perceived as necessary, pointing to the generic nature of the

    managerial competencies. Thus, Hypothesis 1 was supported.

    From the twenty-three highly rated competencies, factor analysis produced a

    five dimensional competency model. These five dimensions were categorised into 1)

    problem solving, 2) personal management, 3) communication and integrity, 4)

    organisation knowledge, 5) image and direction.

    XlI

  • Statistical tools such as ANOVA and Bonferroni Post Hoc multiple

    companson were used to determine variation of competency elements across

    managerial levels, functions and between organisations. From the analysis, it was

    evidenced that there were variations across managerial levels. Nine (39%) out of

    twenty-three elements were significantly varied between top and lower level

    managers. Thus, the hypothesis 2 was less than partially supported.

    Some significant results were also shown pertaining to the variation of

    competency elements across functional areas. Out of the twenty-three elements, six

    elements (26%) were significantly varied. The hypothesis 3 was less than partially

    supported. In addition, the analysis produced significant results between organisations

    in the industry. A total of fifteen (65%) out of twenty-three competency elements

    were significantly varied. Thus, hypothesis 4 was partially supported.

    The current study is timely and of importance especially to managers in the

    telecommunication industry. They could utilise the competency model for managing

    human resources such as in recruitment and selection, training and development, and

    performance appraisal. The findings could also provide further information on the

    usefulness and value of the generic competency model of Hunt and Wallace and it

    could further widen the applicability of the generic competency model across culture

    and industry.

    xiii

  • ABSTRAK

    Abstrak tesis yang dikemukakan kepada Senat Universiti Putra Malaysia sebagai memenuhi keperluan untuk Ijazah Master Sains

    PENGAJIAN KESEDARAN KECEKAPAN PENGURUSAN DALAM INDUSTRI TELEKOMUNIKASI: DARI PERSPEKTIF MALAYSIA

    Oleh

    AMY YEO CHU MAY

    May 1999

    Pengerusi Dr. Nurol'ain Mustapha, Ph.D.

    Fakulti Pusat Pengajian Siswazah Pengurusan Malaysia

    Kajian ini telah dijalankan bertujuan untuk memberi suatu pemahaman

    kecekapan dari pandangan perspektif konteks Malaysia amnya, dan industri

    telekomunikasi khususnya. Objektif kajian ini ialah untuk meneliti dan memastikan

    satu senarai unsur-unsur kecekapan yang perlu atau penting untuk pengurus-pengurus

    semasa menjalankan tugas mereka.

    Empat hipotesis telah dihuraikan untuk mencapai objektif kajian ini. Ianya

    adalah: 1) para pengurus tidak menyedari sifat kecekapan umum adalah perlu semasa

    menjalankan tugas mereka. 2) tidak ada perbezaan yang menonjol pada unsur-unsur

    kecekapan di antara peringkat pengurusan. 3) tidak ada perbezaan yang menonjol

    pada unsur-unsur kecekapan di antara bahagian-bahagian yang berfungsi. 4) tidak ada

    XlV

  • perbezaan yang menonjol pada unsur-unsur kecekapan di antara organisasi-organisai

    dalam industri itu sendiri.

    Data untuk kajian ini dikumpul terutamanya menerusi penggunaan soalselidik

    yang distruktur khas. Sembilan puluh satu unsur-unsur kecekapan yang digunakan

    dalam kajian ini berdasarkan kepada soalselidik yang dibentuk oleh Hunt dan

    Wallace (1997). Pakaj Perangkaan Sains Sosial (SPSS) telah digunakan untuk

    menganaiisiskan data-data yang diperolehi dari soalselidik. Selain daripada itu,

    kaedah-kaedah perangkaan seperti analisis deskriptif, analisis faktor, ANOV A dan

    sebagainya telah digunakan untuk menganalisiskan data-data tersebut. Hasil kajian

    utama adalah seperti berikut:

    Dari analisis deskriptif, perhitungan purata untuk sembilan puluh satu unsur

    kecekapan telah diatur mengikut susunan urutan menurun. Hasil kajian tersebut

    menunjukkan bahawa para pengurus menyedari sembilan puluh satu unsur kecekapan

    perlu ketika melaksanakan tugas mereka. Dari senarai sembilan puluh satu unsur

    unsur kecekapan, lebih daripada 80% unsur disedari mustahak, menunjukkan sifat

    kecekapan pengurusan bersifat umum. Oleh yang dernikian, hipotesis 1 telah

    disokongi.

    Dari dua puluh tiga unsur-unsur kecekapan yang terpenting, analisis faktor

    telah menghasilkan model kecekapan lima dimensi. Kelima-limanya telah

    xv

  • digolongkan kepada 1) penyelesaian masalah, 2) pengurusan perseorangan, 3)

    komunikasi dan ketulusan, 4) pengetahuan organisasi, 5) imej dan haluan.

    Kaedah-kaedah perangkaan seperti ANOV A dan sebagainya telah digunakan

    untuk menentukan perbezaan unsur-unsur kecekapan melintasi peringkat pengurusan,

    fungsi dan di anatara organisasi. Dari analisis tersebut, terbukti adanya perbezaan

    melintasi peringkat pengurusan. Sembilan (39%) dari dua puluh tiga unsur-unsur amat

    berbeza antara peringkat pengurusan atasan dan peringkat pengurusan bawahan.

    Maka, hipotesis 2 adalah kurang dari disokongi secara tidak menyeluruh.

    Terdapat juga hasil-hasil kajian menonjol terhadap perbezaan unsur-unsur

    kecekapan dari aspek bahagian-bahagian yang berfungsi. Di antara dua puluh tiga

    unsur ini, enam (26%) daripadanya telah menunjukkan perbezaan menonjol. Oleh

    yang demikian, hipotesis 3 disokongi secara tidak menyeluruh. Tambahan juga,

    analisis ini mengemukakan hasil menonjol antara organisasi-organisasi dalam industri

    ini. Sebanyak lima belas (65%) dari dua puluh tiga unsur-unsur kecekapan menpunyai

    perbezaan yang menonjol. Maka, hipotesis 4 telah disokongi dengan separuhnya.

    Kajian semasa ini amatlah tepat pada masa ini, dan penting terutama sekali

    kepada para pengurus dalam industri telekomunikasi. Para pengurus boleh

    menggunakan model tersebut untuk menguruskan sumber manUSIa seperti

    pengambilan dan pemilihan, latihan dan pembangunan serta penilaian prestasi. Hasil

    kajian tersebut juga boleh menyumbangkan maklumat-maklumat lanjut berkenaan

    XVI

  • dengan faedah dan nilai model kecekapan umum yang dibentuk oleh Hunt dan

    Wallace dan penggunaan model kecekapan boleh juga diperluaskan melintasi

    kebudayaan dan organisasi.

    XVIl

  • CHAPTER ONE

    INTRODUCTION

    This chapter presents the background of the study, problem statement,

    objectives of the study, conceptual framework and hypotheses of the study. The

    chapter also cover importance and assumptions of the study.

    Background

    Organisations in nearly every sector of the economy in Malaysia were facing

    increases in the rate of environmental change, and corporate managers were making

    major structural changes so that their organisations were able to adapt to the new

    conditions. Increased global competition, technological innovation, and more

    sophisticated customers with a wider range of needs, are just some of the forces

    which have made the telecommunications industry, in particular, more turbulent and

    adaptable to changing conditions.

  • 2

    Most organisations probably have tried at least one of the new wave of

    human resources strategies that have made a splash in the marketplace in recent

    years. Re-engineering, downsizing, total quality management, teams and a wealth of

    other processes were being tried as organisations seek a competitive edge in an ever

    changing business climate. One of these innovative strategies was the use of

    organisational and individual competencies to focus on organisation in its critical

    success factors and to develop individual behaviour that support "core

    competencies" (Tucker, 1994).

    Recently, managers were now encouraged to list the competencies that

    organisations needed to operate successfully. These competencies are then used in

    selection, promotion, appraisal, counselling and vocational guidance. In fact,

    whether it was a very small business or a multi-billion ringgit organisations,

    managers were aware of the importance of the competency-based for the said

    objectives.

    Environmental ''triggers'' precipitating strategic change have included the

    impact of new technology, new competitive arrangements such as the growth of

    mergers, acquisitions, strategic alliances, take-overs, and joint ventures, and change

    to the context in which organisations new operate.

    In order to respond to increased customer sophistication and greater

    international competition, many organisations attempted to redefine their mission

  • 3

    and strategy, to diversify into new areas and to develop new products and services

    more rapidly. There has also been more emphasis on product and service quality and

    on "customer care", with organisations often introducing cultural change

    programmes to emphasize more commercial and less bureaucratic values and

    pressure on staff roles, with structural changes introduced to make the organisation

    more decentralised, flexible and responsive. All these have been perceived as

    requiring new managerial skills and competences.

    Problem Statement

    The Scenario of the World Telecommunications Industry

    On February 15, 1997, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) signed an

    agreement that liberalised world wide telecommunications services significantly.

    The agreement signed by 69 countries appeared to pave the way for the global use of

    mobile telecommunications equipment.

    This move has reflected the concerted effort by the parties involved to open

    up their markets gradually. The vanous signatories, which accounted for

    approximately 90 per cent of the world's telecommunications services, have

    addressed a wide range of issues, including future policy directions, legislative

    structure, market liberalisation and management of cross-boarder systems.

  • 4

    The agreement also provided that signatory countries were to open up their

    telecom market to more foreign firms and to grant more licences and allow increased

    competition. However, the extent to which countries have committed to open their

    markets varies as the terms of the agreements were not unilateral.

    In terms of the specific area of market liberalisation in the wake of these

    negotiations, the United States of America was moving towards an open market in

    all areas of telecommunications while Canada has dropped its requirement for equal

    usage in mobile satellite systems and has pledged to remove existing providers'

    exclusive operating rights by 2002.

    Within the European Union, Spain and Portugal were scheduled to introduce

    market liberalisation by the end of 1998 with Ireland and Greece following in 2000

    and 2003, respectively elsewhere within the continent, Norway and Ireland were of

    course for full liberalisation, and Switzerland had agreed to end monopoly rights

    within its telecommunications to competition by 2003. Romania was aiming for

    cellular liberalisation by 2002 and Bulgaria was set for full competition by 2003,

    Within Africa, Ghana the Ivory Coast and Tunisia have agreed to open up mobile

    telecommunications service within their boarders.

    A similar situation prevailed in Southeast Asia and the Pacific region where

    Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Mauritius, New Zealand, and Philippines and

  • PERPUSTAKAAN SULTAN ABDUL SAtM,u UNIVERSm PUTRA MALAYSIA

    5

    Singapore have signed up for varying degrees of international provider access until

    2000.

    Malaysia, was no exception. Since 1991, the Government of Malaysia has

    liberalised the telecommunication sector. Over the past few years the Malaysian

    government had licensed multiple supplier of basic and value-added services in the

    industry. These service providers were introducing more state-of-art services

    including videoconferencing. telecommerce and teleservice, thus producing

    opportunities for joint-ventures for the development of new products and services in

    the industry. In July 1996 the Malaysian government decided to allow her seven

    existing communication companies to operate without merging or buying each other

    out. These seven companies were:

    • Telekom Malaysia Berhad (STMB) - (originally a government body with

    total monopoly, now corporatise but still partly owned by the

    government) offered fixed-line network and mobile services.

    • Celcom (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd - offered mobile service, was licensed to

    operate a fixed-line service and was about to invest in low-orbit

    satellites.

    • Binariang Berhad - offered mobile seTVlces, own Malaysia's first

    satellite (MEASAT) was licensed to operate a fixed-line network.

  • 6

    • Time Telecommunications Sdn Bhd - owned a fibre-optic network along

    the length of the peninsula, offered full facilities for fixed and mobile

    telephones, payphones and operates an international gateway.

    • DiGi Telecommunications Sdn Bhd (Formerly known as Mutiara

    Telecoms) - offered mobile services, has an international gateway and

    was licensed to operate a domestic fixed-line network.

    • Mobikom - offered mobile service.

    • Syarikat Telefon Wireless - provided wireless local loop and was

    licensed to operate a fixed-line network.

    The Scenario of the Malaysian Telecommunication Industry

    In developing Malaysia from an agriculture society into industrial society,

    and now towards an information-rich society, the development of the information

    superhighway, in general, and the Multimedia Super Corridor (MSC) in particular,

    through the telecommunication infrastructure, was given priority by the government.

    The merging of telecommunications, broadcasting and computer technologies was

    expected to improve the quality of telecommunications services as well as bring

    changes in lifestyle and the way business is conducted. International strategic

    alliances among telecommunications, cable and video, broadcasting and computer

    operators were also expected to enhance the benefits of synergy derived from the

    merging of these technologies. With interactive multimedia along the information

  • 7

    superhighway, physical commuting would be reduced with teleconferencing,

    telemedicine, distance learning, video on demand, home banking and home

    shopping, networking, facilities through development in telecommunications

    infrastructure, would lead to improved quality life for the Malaysian public.

    Private operators were expected to invest a total ofRM25.4b during Seventh

    Malaysia Plan (7MP -1995-2000) whilst development allocation for

    Telecommunications and Post amounted to RM25.5 million. The telecommunication

    sub-sector was expected to be one of the highest growth sectors of the economy with

    advancement of the telecommunication technology.

    The industry was expected to see many changes over the next few years. The

    prime reason for this was the proposed MSC project, which would feature high

    speed telecommunications capabilities. Although the actual impact of MSC project

    was yet unknown, it cannot help but cause growth in the sector and strong

    competition among the telecommunication providers. However, due to the current

    economic crisis. some operators were struggling to survive. To lend them some

    assistance, the government recently raised the ceiling on foreign equity shareholding

    in local telecom firms to 61 % in the hope that there would be some foreign capital

    injection.