universal stack test notification, …exploreintel.com/assets/documents/newmexico/reports/2014...
TRANSCRIPT
New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau
1301 Siler Road Building B Santa Fe, NM 87507
Phone (505) 476-4300 Fax (505) 476-4375
Version 1/1/2010
NMED USE ONLY NMED USE ONLY
DTS UNIVERSAL STACK TEST
NOTIFICATION, PROTOCOL AND REPORT FORM
Staff
TEMPO Admin
Submit to: [email protected]
I. DATABASE HEADER INFORMATION (drop down menus in bold) a. AI#
1103 Test Notification/Protocol Periodic Test (EPA Method)
d. Company Name: e. Facility Name:
Intel Corporation Intel Rio Rancho Facility f. Emission Unit Numbers:
RCTOs g. Emission Unit Description (boiler, Waukesha 7042, etc)
Process Scrubbers, RCTO
h. Reports - Tracking Number from notification response: CMT
i. Proposed Test Date: j. Actual test date:
07/16/14 - 08/24/14 07/16/14 – 08/24/14
k. Reason for test (name permit requirement, NSPS, MACT, consent decree, etc. Indicate here is this notification is a revised test date only)
NSR Permit 0325M11R7, Sections A801.B, A802.B, B111.D
II. GENERAL COMPANY AND FACILITY INFORMATION
a.Company Address: k.. Facility Address:
4100 Sara Road 4100 Sara Road b. City: c. State: d. Zip: l. City: m. State: n. Zip:
Rio Rancho NM 87124� Rio Rancho NM 87124 e. Environmental Contact: f. Title: o. Facility Contact: p. Title:
Andrew Moen Environmental Engineer Andrew Moen Environmental Engineer g. Phone Number: h. Pager Number: q. Phone Number: r. Pager Number:
505-794-4911 505-991-7664 505-794-4911 505-991-7664 i. Email Address: s. Email Address:
[email protected] [email protected] j. Title V Permit Number: t. NSR Permit Number:
NA 0325M11R7
u. Detailed driving directions from nearest New Mexico town: From NM Hwy 528 in Rio Rancho, turn into the 19th street entrance and proceed to the main entrance
III. TESTING FIRM a. Company: ERM-West, Inc.
g. Contact: Kurt Parker
b. Address 1: 6455 S. Yosemite St.
h. Title: Partner
c. Address 2: Suite 900
i. Office Phone: 720-200-7156
j. Cell Phone: 303-324-5211
d. City: Greenwood Village
e. State: CO
f. Zip: 80111
k. Email Address: [email protected]
NMED Air Quality Bureau
UNIVERSAL STACK TEST NOTIFICATION, PROTOCOL AND
REPORT FORM Page 2 of 6
IV CONTROL EQUIPMENT STACK PARAMETERS
a. Emission:
Unit Numbers
b. Make and Model
c. Serial
No
d. Permitted Capacity (acfm)
i. Startup
Date
m. Velocity (ft/sec)
n. Temp (oF)
o. Dia (in)
p. Upstream
Disturbance (in)
p. Downstream Disturbance
(in)
96 Harrington ECV 10 10-5 LB S-021401-01 50,000 Jan-02 34.23 66.8 48 175 118
95 Harrington ECV 10 10-5 LB S-021401-02 50,000 Jan-02 35.02 67.4 48 175 118
1 Harrington ECV 10 10-5 LB S-021401-03 50,000 Jan-02 36.24 67.8 48 175 118
89 Harrington ECV 10 5 9-5 LB S-101504-1 50,000 Nov-05 50.49 66.2 48 183 110
161 Harrington ECV 4-5-5 LB S-061102-1 50,000 Nov-02 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF
93 Harrington ECV 10 10-5 LB BPC 680-5 10,000 Jan-02 34.9 68.9 48 154 228
85 Harrington ECV 10.5 9-5 LB S-111495-1 55,000 Jun-95 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF
86 Harrington ECV 10.5 9-5 LB S021494-1 55,000 Jun-95 29.9 62.0 60 262 292
87 Harrington ECV 10.5 9-5 LB S-062795-1 55,000 Jun-95 31.9 60.3 60 262 292
88 Harrington ECV 10.5 9-5 LB S-021494-2 55,000 Jun-95 30.4 62.4 60 262 292
90 Harrington ECV 10.5 9-5 LB S-111495-1 55,000 Jul-09 26.9 62.8 60 262 292
91 Harrington ECV 10.5 9-5 LB S-021494-2 55,000 Jul-09 25.13 62.3 60 262 292
92 Harrington ECV 10.5 9-5 LB S-021494-5 55,000 Jul-09 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF
94 Harrington ECV 10.5 9-5 LB S-021494-5 55,000 Jun-96 24.4 60.0 60 262 292
97 Harrington ECV 10.5 9-5 LB S-11396-1 55,000 Jun-96 23.6 57.5 60 262 292
37 Harrington ECV 55-5 LB S-021494-9 5,000 Apr-96 21.5 72.5 19.5 16 101
151 Harrington ECV 3 4-5 LB S-072403-1 10,000 Dec-03 31.6 72.2 18 35 126
152 Harrington ECV 3 4-5 LB S-101504-5 5,000 Jun-06 24.3 69.0 19.75 15 105
153 Harrington ECV 3 4-5 LB S-101504-6 10,000 Dec-05 24.6 71.5 18 35 103
46 HarringtonECV 10 10-5 LB S-021401-04 50,000 Dec-01 30.7 66.9 48 124 166
53 HarringtonECV 10 10-5 LB S-021401-05 50,000 Dec-01 31.43 64.9 48 124 166
4 HarringtonECV 10 10-5 LB S-101504-2 35,000 May-05 48.89 66.4 48 175 102
45a/45b Harrington ECV 3 4-5 LB S-112901-1/S-
101504-4 10,000 ea. Nov-
02/May-05 47.1 67.6 18 360 66.6
e. Exceptions: NA
g. Emission Unit Description: 197 Semiconductor Manufacturing Fab
h. Installation Date: 1985
k. Date Reached Max. Capacity: NA
l. Control Equipment Description: Process Scrubbers
NMED Air Quality Bureau
UNIVERSAL STACK TEST NOTIFICATION, PROTOCOL AND
REPORT FORM Page 3 of 6
IV EMISSION UNIT STACK PARAMETERS
a. Emission: Unit Numbers
b. Make and Model
c. Serial No
d. Permitted Capacity (acfm)
i. Startup Date
m. Velocity (ft/sec)
n. Temp (oF)
o. Dia (in)
p. Upstream
Disturbance (in)
p. Downstream
Disturbance (in)
162-TO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH 3546-038 1,100 Oct-08 34.6 782.8 17.75 514 114
162-RO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH NA 25,000 Oct-08 26.4 93.4 40 126 99
163-TO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH 3546-039 1,100 Oct-08 27.9 711.3 17.75 514 114
163-RO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH NA 25,000 Oct-08 29.1 86.9 40 126 99
164-TO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH 3546-053 1,100 Jan-10 28.7 688.3 17.75 514 107
164-RO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH NA 25,000 Jan-10 29.1 111.3 41.75 99 126
171-TO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH 3546-053 1,100 July-11 30.4 745.1 17.75 156 144
171-RO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH NA 25,000 July-11 18.3 86.8 39.56 25 98
170-TO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH 3546-053 1,100 July-11 29.4 741.3 17.63 166 146
170-RO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH NA 25,000 July-11 18.7 88.8 39.38 27 104
168-TO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH 3546-053 1,100 July-11 28.3 720.1 17.38 166 145
168-RO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH NA 25,000 July-11 13.4 83.4 39.63 27 103
167-TO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH 3546-053 1,100 July-11 28.1 704.9 17.38 166 145
167-RO Munters 1ZS-3546-TH NA 25,000 July-11 13.8 80.8 39.63 27 103
e. Exceptions: NA
g. Emission Unit Description: 197 Semiconductor Manufacturing Fab
h. Installation Date: 1985
k. Date Reached Max. Capacity: NA
l. Control Equipment Description: RCTOs
V. POLLUTANTS AND PROPOSED TEST METHODS
Pollutant or Parameter: Proposed Test Methods (Deviations from approved methods require supporting documentation and prior authorization)
Deviation to Test Method Requested
Portable Analyzer Methods for NOx, CO, SO2
NOx EPA Method 7E
CO EPA Method 10
SO2 EPA Method 6
VOCs (Specify) RM25A (RCTO's)
HAPs (Specify) RM26(A) for Cl2; ASTM D6348-12 for HCl and HF
PM (TSP) EPA Method 5
PM10 EPA Method 201
PM2.5 (Specify)
Opacity EPA Method 9
Visual E. EPA Method 22
Stack Flow EPA Methods 1 – 3
Moisture EPA Method 4
Other (Specify) Moisture by ASTM D6348-12
Other (Specify) CO2 by ASTM D6348-12
Other (Specify)
NMED Air Quality Bureau
UNIVERSAL STACK TEST NOTIFICATION, PROTOCOL AND
REPORT FORM Page 4 of 6
List Specific VOC’s and HAP’s: HCl, HF, Cl2
VI. PROPOSED TEST RUN AND TEST LOAD INFORMATION a. Number of Test Runs: b. Run Duration c. Required by (regulation or permit number): d. Specific Condition or Section:
1 (VOC); 1 (HCl, HF) 2 (Cl2) 8 hrs Cl2 2x4hrs 0325M11R7 A801.B; A802.B PLEASE NOTE – Default run duration is 60 minutes, unless otherwise specified by an applicable regulation. e. Expected Load: f. Percent of Permitted Capacity: g. Is this an opacity test? h. If yes, no. of observation pts.:
Normal NA Yes No NA i. If expected load during test is less than 90% of capacity, explain:
NA
NOTE – Failure to test at 90-100% of permitted load will limit unit operation to 110% of tested load until a new initial compliance test is conducted.
PLANT OR UNIT OPERATING PARAMETERS TO BE MONITORED j. List and explain the plant operating parameters that will be monitored and applicable permit conditions or regulatory standards.
Process exhaust scrubbers: recirculation water flow rate (gpm), fan status, bypass status; RCTOs: inlet damper position, thermal oxidizer combustion chamber temperature (F), system bypass damper position
VII. ADDITIONAL DETAILS (where applicable)
SCRUBBER TESTING SCHEDULE
Intel will be operating the system scrubbers under the standard (normal) configuration. In support of continuous operation and redundancy is systems, the following considerations are in place that may affect the specific scrubbers that are tested during the annual program: Only the 2 of 3 NP NH3 scrubbers (40-np2-2s & 40-np2-2s) were tested ; SC-40-np2-1s (#161) was offline; Only 2 of 3 NX NH3 scrubbers (RRFB-SC142-1-00 & RRFB-SC142-1-00);RRFD SC-12-fb1-2s (#92) was offline; Only 5 of 6 Fab NX corrosive scrubbers will be tested; SC-12-fb1-2s (#85) was offline
RATA and INSTRUMENTAL ANALYZER CALIBRATION PROCEDURES
a. Do any of the methods you are proposing utilize instrumental analyzers (i.e.; EPA Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, 18, 25/25A, 320 etc.)? If yes, briefly describe analyzer calibration procedures and/or calibration standard procedures. Enter the highest pollutant concentration expected and the proposed concentrations of calibration gases.
Yes No
ASTM D6348-12 (FT-IR): ASTM D6348-12 uses Calibration Transfer Standards (CTS) for operational verfication. Ethylene will be the CTS for this program at approximately 100 ppm. Exhaust concentations may range from several tenths of a ppm to several ppm. The calibration library has standardized spectra for HCl up to 286 ppm and for HF up to 357 ppm. Instrument operation will follow manufacturers procedures. FT-IR calibration responses are instrument and site independent and will use standard reference spectra generated by the manufacturer (based off of Hitran calibration spectra for HCl and HF). The method detection limits will be calculated following ASTM D6348-12 using the actual sample spectra. RM25A (VOC) for the extended 8 Hour VOC testing pre and post FID calibrations will be supported for each system assessment. During the 8 hour test period, hourly drift checks will not be performed. If the ending instrument drift checks exceed the 3% method limit, a post test calibration will be performed and the results reported using both calibrations.
NMED Air Quality Bureau
UNIVERSAL STACK TEST NOTIFICATION, PROTOCOL AND
REPORT FORM Page 5 of 6
PROPOSED METHOD DEVIATIONS
EPA RM3/RM3A: Molecular weight for the scrubber tests will be assumed to be ambient air as there is no combustion as part of the process or abatement. A molecular weight of 28.8 will be assumed (20.9 % O2, 79.1 % N2, 0% CO2). CO2 values will be monitored by the FT-IR used for the HCl and HF measurements for confirmation of this determination method. For the RCTO exhaust streams, the molecular weight will be determined using CO2 measurements, made by FT-IR verification for a one-hour period. Oxygen will be derived by subtracting the measured CO2 concentration from 20.9% for the thermal oxidizer exhaust streams. The recuperative outlet exhaust streams are anticipated to have ambient concentratins of CO2 present and a molecular weight of 28.8 will be assumed and verified by the FT-IR for CO2 concentration. EPA RM4 (or equivalent). For the scrubbers, moisture will be measured using the FT-IR method ASTM D6348-12 in tandem with the HCl and HF measurements. For the RCTO exhaust streams, moisture concentrations will be verified by FT-IR analysis for a period of no less than one hour during each 8 hour period of FID assessment. RM25A (VOC) for the 8 Hour VOC testing, initial and or final instrument calibrations will be conducted. During the 8 hour test period, hourly drift checks will not be performed. If the ending instrument drift checks exceed the 3% method limit, a post test calibration will be performed and the results reported using both calibrations. RM26A. Chlorine sampling will be conducted using RM26A using a constant rate sampling approach. Test runs will be supported in duplicate with each test run four (4) hours in duration. Sampling will be conducted at a single point located a the nearest practical location to the median velocity as measured by a preliminary Pitot traverse. The sampling rate will be approximately 0.75 cubic feet per minute (cfm) with a total test volume of approximately 150-200 cubic feet, dependent on dH setting.
SAMPLING TRAIN LEAK CHECK PROCEDURES
b. Do any of the methods you are proposing utilize the EPA Method 5 sampling train (i.e.; EPA Methods 1-4, 5, 17, 26/26A, 29, etc.)? If yes, briefly describe sampling train and pitot tube leak check procedures: Yes No
For RM26(A), Pre-test leak checks will be performed to to ensure proper train setup and operation. Post Test leak checks will be performed at the maximum sample train vacuum encounterd during the test run as per EPA RM5 procedures.
EPA METHOD 19 IN LIEU OF EPA METHODS 1-4
c. Are you proposing to utilize EPA Method 19 in lieu of EPA Methods 1-4? If yes, explain why you believe this proposal is justified: Yes No
NA
PLEASE NOTE – EPA Method 19 may be utilized in lieu of EPA Methods 1-4, subject to the approval of the Department. If you are proposing to utilize EPA Method 19 in lieu of EPA Methods 1-4, you MUST include a recent fuel gas heating value analysis as well as a recent fuel flow meter calibration certificate, preferably conducted on the day of the test, but no earlier than three months prior to the test date. If the analyses have been conducted prior to the test date, you MUST append the certificates to the protocol. If conducted on the day of the test, you MUST append the certificates to the final test report.
VIII. ATTACHMENTS (as needed to support proposed test; check all that apply)
NOTIFICATION/PROTOCOL ATTACHMENTS
Road Map Indicating Directions from Nearest New Mexico Town to Facility
Schematic of process being tested showing emission points, sampling sites and stack cross-section
Copy of proposed test methods (except for those promulgated test methods found in 40 CFR 51, 60, 61 and 63)
Fuel Heating Value Analysis
Fuel Flow Meter Calibration Certificate
Other:
Other:
NMED Air Quality Bureau
UNIVERSAL STACK TEST NOTIFICATION, PROTOCOL AND
REPORT FORM Page 6 of 6
TEST REPORT ATTACHMENTS
Section 2. Tables of Results
Supporting Documents (Specify)
Retain Report Section 3 - Test Procedures, Data, Calculations, Appendices – 2 years NSR permits, 5 years TV
IX. CERTIFICATION
This document has been prepared under my supervision and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that acceptance of this protocol does not waive the requirements of any permit or regulation. I understand that any procedural errors or omissions are the sole responsibility of the permit holder. Signature: Print Name and Title:
Andrew Moen / Environmental Engineer
Date:
09/22/2014
Responsible Official for Title V? Yes No (R.O signature not required for routine periodic testing)
INTEL CORPORATION
4100 SARA ROAD
RIO RANCHO, NEW MEXICO 87124
TEST REPORT
Air Quality Permit #325‐M11‐R7 ANNUAL NSR TESTING Intel Rio Rancho Facility
ERM Reference 0114780‐2000‐0000
September 22, 2014
Section 2 ‐ Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 UNIVERSAL STACK TEST NOTIFICATION, PROTOCOL AND REPORT FORM
DATABASE HEADER INFORMATION GENERAL COMPANY AND FACILITY INFORMATION TESTING FIRM INFORMATION EMISSION UNIT IDENTIFICATION TARGET POLLUTANTS AND PROPOSED TEST METHODS PROPOSED TEST RUN AND TEST LOAD INFORMATION ADDITIONAL DETAILS (where applicable)
List of Acronyms/Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ ii
SECTION 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... 1
Summary of Test Results ........................................................................................................................... 1
A. Scrubber Measurement Results ...................................................................................................... 3
B. RCTO FID Measurement Results ..................................................................................................... 7
C. Unit Operating Parameters ........................................................................................................... 11
D. Control Equipment Operating Parameters ................................................................................... 11
E. Comparison of Measured and Modeled Parameters .................................................................... 12
F. Relative Detection Limits of Measured Compounds..................................................................... 12
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1; Summary Results – Estimated Site Total Tons per Year .................................................................. 1 Table 2; Scrubber Test Chronology ............................................................................................................... 2 Table 3; RCTO Overall Test Chronology ........................................................................................................ 2 Table 4; Scrubber HCl and HF Results Summary ........................................................................................... 3 Table 5; Scrubber Chlorine (Cl2) Results Summary ....................................................................................... 4 Table 6; Scrubber Flow Rate Results Summary ............................................................................................ 5 Table 7; RCTO Annual Emissions Estimate Summary ................................................................................... 7 Table 8; RCTO Permit ID 162 (RRNP‐VOC138‐1‐120) Emission Results; 07/23/2014 .................................. 7 Table 9; RCTO Permit ID 163 (RRNP‐VOC138‐2‐120) Emissions Results 07/23/2014 .................................. 8 Table 10; RCTO Permit ID 164 (RRNP‐VOC138‐3‐120) Emissions Results 07/23/2014 ................................ 8 Table 11; RCTO Permit ID 167 (F11B‐VOC138‐2‐120) Emissions Results 08/15/2014 ................................. 8 Table 12; RCTO Permit ID 168 (F11B‐VOC138‐1‐120) Emissions Results 08/15/2014 ................................. 9 Table 13; RCTO Permit ID 170 (F11F‐VOC138‐2‐120) Emissions Results 08/18/2014.................................. 9 Table 14; RCTO Permit ID 171 (F11F‐VOC138‐1‐120) Emissions Results 08/18/2014.................................. 9 Table 15; RCTO Flow Rate Summary Results .............................................................................................. 10 Table 16; Scrubber Control Parameters ...................................................................................................... 11 Table 17; RCTO Control Parameters ........................................................................................................... 12 Table 18; Overall HAP and Target Detection Limits for Measurement Program........................................ 12
Section 2 ‐ Page ii
List of Acronyms/Abbreviations
ACFM Unit of Flow; Actual Cubic Feet Per Minute ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
C Unit of Temperature; degrees Celsius CFR Code of Federal Register C3H8 Propane (calibration standard for FID) Cl2 Chloride CO2 Carbon Dioxide Conc. Concentration DAS Data Acquisition System DSCFM Unit of Flow; Dry Standard Cubic Feet Per Minute (corr. To 29.92” Hg & 25°C) F11F Fab 11X Fab Side location designation F11B Fab 11X West Bridge Side location designation
F Unit of Temperature; degrees Fahrenheit FT‐IR Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy GPM Gallon per minute HF Hydrogen Fluoride HCl Hydrochloric Acid Lbs/hr Pounds per hour (unit of emissions per unit time) MW Molecular Weight NA Not Applicable ND Non‐Detected (value below the analytical/instrument limit of detection) NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology NMED New Mexico Environmental Department NSR New Source Review O2 Oxygen TPY Unit of emissions; Tons per Year ppb Unit of concentration; parts per billion ppm Unit of concentration; parts per million PSEL Plant Site Emission Limit RM Reference Method RCTO Recuperative Thermal Oxidizer ‐RO Rotor Outlet, synonymous with Wheel Exhaust of the Munters Systems. Exhaust
measurement point prior to common wheel exhaust manifold and stacks RRNP Fab 11X Bridge Side location designation SCFM Unit of Flow; Std. Cubic Feet Per Minute (corr. To 29.92” Hg & 25°C) SOP Standard Operating Procedure SS Stainless Steel THC Total Hydrocarbon Concentration (synonomus with VOC) ‐TO Thermal Oxidizer Outlet. Exhaust measurement point after combustion in the Oxidizer
Chamber TPY Tons Per Year (unit of emissions per unit time) QA Quality Assurance QC Quality Control VOC Volatile Organic Compound
Section 2 ‐ Page 1
SECTION 2
Summary of Test Results
Emission monitoring was conducted at Intel Corporation’s Rio Rancho, New Mexico facility supporting
specific annual testing requirements defined in the facility’s air permit. This 2014 annual test program
consisted of monitoring the emissions from the seven (7) operating MUNTERS concentrator/thermal
oxidizer systems (referred to as RCTO’s) supporting the site. Continuous total hydrocarbon (THC)
monitoring for volatile organic compounds (VOC’s), using calibrated flame ionization detectors (FID’s),
was supported for monitoring each of the seven operational RCTOs. Additionally, the twenty‐one
operational wet scrubbers supporting all Fab operations were measured for hydrogen chloride (HCl),
hydrogen fluoride (HF), and chlorine (Cl2) emissions as part of the program. Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy (FT‐IR) measurements were supported for HCl and HF at each of the scrubber exhaust
streams. Batch measurements for Cl2 using EPA Reference Method 26A (RM26A) was also conducted on
each of the scrubbers. All scrubber and RCTO tests were conducted for a minimum of eight (8) hours;
with the batch EPA RM26A chlorine measurements conducted in duplicate for 4 hours each concurrent
with the continuous scrubber measurements.
The program was conducted to satisfy the testing requirements of Air Quality Permit #325‐M11‐R7
Conditions A801.B, A802.B, and B111.D. Condition A801.B requires Intel to conduct annual 8‐hour tests
of the RCTO exhaust stacks for VOCs in terms of pounds per hour as propane. Conditions A802.B
requires Intel to conduct annual 8‐hour tests of all operational wet scrubber exhaust stacks for HCl, HF,
and Cl2 in terms of pounds per hour.
In support of the RCTO and scrubber measurements, exhaust gas flow rates were measured for
converting the measured pollutant concentration data to mass emissions. The methods used in the test
program followed the test plan submitted and approved by NMED. The summary of results is provided
in Section 2, which is being submitted along with the Universal Stack Test Notification Protocol and
Report Form to NMED. Section 3 supports the raw data and certification documentation, as well as
additional documentation developed from this program. This is retained on file at the Intel site.
The facility has a plant site emission limit (PSEL) for VOCs and individual HAPs. In assessment of annual
HAP emissions, the annual emissions were developed from the measured and calculated hourly
emissions applied to a 24 hours/day x 7 days/week x 365 days/year operations. The pollutant emissions
are totaled and compared to the permitted PSEL's. This comparison is for illustrative purposes only, as it
is not the permit defined mechanism for compliance determination. Results are reported in Table 1.
Table 1; Summary Results – Estimated Site Total Tons per Year
Pollutant Scrubbers (tpy) RCTOs (tpy) Permitted PSEL (tpy)
HCl < 0.16 ‐ * HF 1.49 ‐ * Cl2 ≤ 0.07 ‐ *
VOC ‐ 2.34 96.5
Section 2 ‐ Page 2
The overall chronology for the test program for all sources is provided in Table 2 for the scrubbers and
Table 3 for the RCTO's.
Table 2; Scrubber Test Chronology
Scrubber
Permit #
Scrubber Equipment
Number Date Test Period
89 SC‐12‐np2‐4s 07/25/14 08:06 ‐ 17:09
1 SC‐40‐np2‐3s 07/25/14 08:06 ‐ 17:08
95 SC‐12‐np2‐2s 07/26/14 07:28 – 15:49
96 SC‐12‐np2‐1s 07/26/14 07:30 – 15:50
161 SC‐40‐np2‐1s OFFLINE ‐
160 SC‐40‐np2‐2s 07/28/14 08:16 ‐ 16:47
93 SC‐12‐np2‐3s 07/29/14 08:03 ‐ 16:26
85 SC‐12‐fb1‐2s OFFLINE ‐
86 SC‐12‐fb1‐3s 07/31/14 08:22 ‐ 17:03
87 SC‐12‐fb1‐4s 07/31/14 08:22 ‐ 18:04
88 SC‐12‐fb1‐5s 08/02/14 08:22 ‐ 16:47
91 RRFB‐SC142‐2‐00s 08/02/14 08:19 ‐ 16:44
90 RRFB‐SC142‐1‐00s 08/06/14 06:15 ‐ 14:29
92 RRFD‐SC142‐1‐00s OFFLINE ‐
94 SC‐12‐fd1‐3s 08/05/14 06:44 ‐ 14:55
97 SC‐12‐fd1‐6s 08/07/14 06:35 ‐ 15:08
37 RRGC‐SC‐12‐GC1‐1s 08/09/14 07:00 ‐ 15:23
151 RRGC‐SC‐133‐3‐100s 08/09/14 06:59 ‐ 15:24
152 RRGC‐SC‐12‐GC1‐2s 08/11/14 07:31 ‐ 16:34
153 RRGC‐SC‐133‐4‐100s 08/11/14 07:32 ‐ 16:35
46 SC‐12‐lt2‐1s 08/20/14 07:52 ‐ 16:36
53 SC‐12‐lt2‐2s 08/21/14 07:16 ‐ 15:38
4 SC‐12‐lt2‐3s 08/20/14 07:52 ‐ 16:35
Table 3; RCTO Overall Test Chronology
RCTO
Permit # RCTO Equipment Number Date Test Period
171 F11F VOC138‐1‐120 08/18/2014 06:00 ‐ 15:00
170 F11F VOC138‐2‐120 08/18/2014 07:00 ‐ 15:00
168 F11B VOC138‐1‐120 08/15/2014 06:50 ‐ 14:50
167 F11B VOC138‐2‐120 08/15/2014 06:30 ‐ 14:30
163 RRNPVOC‐138‐2‐120 07/23/2014 08:40 ‐ 16:40
164 RRNPVOC‐138‐3‐120 07/23/2014 09:15 ‐ 17:15
162 RRNPVOC‐138‐1‐120 07/23/2014 07:45 ‐ 15:45
Section 2 ‐ Page 3
A. Scrubber Measurement Results
The Scrubber HCl and HF emission results from the 8‐hour FT‐IR measurements are provided in Table 4.
Scrubber Cl2 results from the duplicate 4‐hour measurements are provided in Table 5. Scrubber flow
rate results are provided in Table 6.
Table 4; Scrubber HCl and HF Results Summary
Permit No.
Equipment ID HCl HF
(ppb) (lb/hr) (tpy) (ppb) (lb/hr) (tpy)
89 SC‐12‐np2‐4s ND ND ND 489 4.70E‐02 0.206
1 SC‐40‐np2‐3s ND ND ND 536 3.69E‐02 0.162
95 SC‐12‐np2‐2s ND ND ND 491 3.27E‐02 0.143
96 SC‐12‐np2‐1s ND ND ND 525 3.42E‐02 0.150
161 SC‐40‐np2‐1s ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
160 SC‐40‐np2‐2s ND ND ND ND ND ND
93 SC‐12‐np2‐3s ND ND ND ND ND ND
85 SC‐12‐fb1‐2s ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
86 SC‐12‐fb1‐3s ND ND ND 81 7.17E‐03 0.031
87 SC‐12‐fb1‐4s ND ND ND 367 3.49E‐02 0.153
88 SC‐12‐fb1‐5s ND ND ND 754 6.81E‐02 0.298
91 RRFB‐SC142‐2‐00s ND ND ND ND ND ND
90 RRFB‐SC142‐1‐00s ND ND ND ND ND ND
92 RRFD‐SC142‐1‐00s ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
94* SC‐12‐fd1‐3s <253 <3.41E‐02 <0.149 113 8.35E‐03 0.037
97 SC‐12‐fd1‐6s ND ND ND ND ND ND
37 RRGC‐SC‐12‐GC1‐1s ND ND ND 71 4.72E‐04 0.002
151 RRGC‐SC‐133‐3‐100s ND ND ND ND ND ND
152* RRGC‐SC‐12‐GC1‐2s <241 <3.43E‐03 <0.015 83 6.45E‐04 0.003
153 RRGC‐SC‐133‐4‐100s ND ND ND ND ND ND
46 SC‐12‐lt2‐1s ND ND ND 379 2.20E‐02 0.096
53 SC‐12‐lt2‐2s ND ND ND 384 2.30E‐02 0.101
4 SC‐12‐lt2‐3s ND ND ND 267 2.47E‐02 0.108
45a/45b SC‐40‐lt2‐1s/2s ND ND ND ND ND ND
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Total 0.04 0.16 ‐ 0.34 1.49
(*) In the source specific measurements, there were a combination of detected and ND values within the eight (8) hour FTIR measurement period. Under the approach of sources that result in a mix of detectable and non‐detectable concentrations for
the test period, the stack average concentration for the test was determined by treating the ND readings as ½ MDL. Sources that report an “ND” for the test run average did not have any pollutant detection (HCL or HF) through the entire 8 hour run period.
Section 2 ‐ Page 4
Table 5; Scrubber Chlorine (Cl2) Results Summary
Permit Equipment Concentration Emissions Emissions
Number ID ppb ppb avg lb/hr lb/hr avg tpy tpy avg
89 11XB‐SC‐12‐np2‐4s < 5.7 < 6.3 < 6.0 < 1.95E‐03 < 2.12E‐03 < 2.03E‐03 < 8.55E‐03 < 9.27E‐03 < 8.91E‐03
1 11XB‐SC‐40‐np2‐3s < 5.2 < 5.4 < 5.3 < 1.30E‐03 < 1.29E‐03 < 1.29E‐03 < 5.67E‐03 < 5.66E‐03 < 5.67E‐03
95 11XB‐SC‐12‐np2‐2s < 5.6 < 5.4 < 5.5 < 1.32E‐03 < 1.27E‐03 < 1.30E‐03 < 5.78E‐03 < 5.57E‐03 < 5.68E‐03
96 11XB‐SC‐12‐np2‐1s < 5.3 < 5.5 < 5.4 < 1.24E‐03 < 1.26E‐03 < 1.25E‐03 < 5.42E‐03 < 5.51E‐03 < 5.46E‐03
160 11XB‐SC‐40‐np2‐2s < 2.1 < 2.1 < 2.1 < 1.01E‐04 < 1.01E‐04 < 1.01E‐04 < 4.43E‐04 < 4.42E‐04 < 4.43E‐04
93 11XB‐SC‐12‐np2‐3s < 2.1 < 2.1 < 2.1 < 8.28E‐05 < 8.81E‐05 < 8.55E‐05 < 3.63E‐04 < 3.86E‐04 < 3.74E‐04
86 11NX‐SC‐12‐fb1‐3s < 5.4 < 5.4 < 5.4 < 1.70E‐03 < 1.71E‐03 < 1.70E‐03 < 7.45E‐03 < 7.49E‐03 < 7.47E‐03
87 11NX‐SC‐12‐fb1‐4s < 5.3 < 5.5 < 5.4 < 1.82E‐03 < 1.85E‐03 < 1.83E‐03 < 7.97E‐03 < 8.09E‐03 < 8.03E‐03
88 11NX‐SC‐12‐fb1‐5s < 5.3 < 5.3 < 5.3 < 1.66E‐03 < 1.75E‐03 < 1.71E‐03 < 7.29E‐03 < 7.67E‐03 < 7.48E‐03
90 11NX RRFB‐SC142‐1‐00s < 1.1 < 1.1 < 1.1 < 2.99E‐04 < 3.03E‐04 < 3.01E‐04 < 1.31E‐03 < 1.33E‐03 < 1.32E‐03
91 11NX‐RRFB‐SC142‐2‐00s < 1.1 < 1.0 < 1.1 < 2.82E‐04 < 2.72E‐04 < 2.77E‐04 < 1.23E‐03 < 1.19E‐03 < 1.21E‐03
94 sc‐12‐fd1‐3s 3.1 3.3 3.2 7.90E‐04 8.89E‐04 8.39E‐04 3.46E‐03 3.89E‐03 3.68E‐03
97 sc‐12‐fd1‐6s < 5.3 < 5.2 < 5.2 < 1.32E‐03 < 1.30E‐03 < 1.31E‐03 < 5.78E‐03 < 5.70E‐03 < 5.74E‐03
37 RRGC‐sc‐12‐gc1‐1s < 2.2 < 2.2 < 2.2 < 5.07E‐05 < 5.26E‐05 < 5.17E‐05 < 2.22E‐04 < 2.30E‐04 < 2.26E‐04
151 RRGC‐sc‐133‐3‐100s < 1.1 1.4 ≤ 1.2 < 3.15E‐05 4.23E‐05 ≤ 3.69E‐05 < 1.38E‐04 1.85E‐04 ≤ 1.62E‐04
152 RRGC‐SC‐12‐GC1‐2 < 5.4 < 5.4 < 5.4 < 1.56E‐04 < 1.44E‐04 < 1.50E‐04 < 6.85E‐04 < 6.30E‐04 < 6.58E‐04
153 RRGC‐SC‐133‐4‐100 < 2.1 < 2.2 < 2.2 < 4.89E‐05 < 5.10E‐05 < 4.99E‐05 < 2.14E‐04 < 2.23E‐04 < 2.19E‐04
46 11XF‐SC‐12‐lt2‐1s 5.1 2.4 3.8 1.03E‐03 5.05E‐04 7.70E‐04 4.53E‐03 2.21E‐03 3.37E‐03
53 11XF‐SC‐12‐lt2‐2s 1.5 1.2 1.4 3.12E‐04 2.68E‐04 2.90E‐04 1.37E‐03 1.17E‐03 1.27E‐03
4 SC‐12‐lt2‐3s 3.5 3.2 3.4 1.16E‐03 1.07E‐03 1.11E‐03 5.09E‐03 4.67E‐03 4.88E‐03
45a 11XF‐SC‐40‐lt2‐1s_2s < 1.0 < 1.1 < 1.1 < 4.46E‐05 < 4.97E‐05 < 4.71E‐05 < 1.95E‐04 < 2.18E‐04 < 2.06E‐04 = =
Total ≤ 1.65E‐02 ≤ 7.25E‐02
Section 2 ‐ Page 5
Table 6; Scrubber Flow Rate Results Summary
Run Stack Press. Moisture Stack Gas Velocity Flow Rate Flow RatePermit No. Equipment ID No. (in. Hg) (%) Temp (oF) (fps) (acfm) (dscfm)
89 SC‐12‐np2‐4s 1 24.78 2.24 64.1 50.70 38,228.2 31,182.2
2 24.75 2.29 68.4 50.27 37,906.1 30,618.9
Avg. 24.76 2.26 66.2 50.49 38,067.1 30,900.5
1 SC‐40‐np2‐3s
1 24.78 2.21 64.5 36.65 27,634.1 22,533.3
2 24.76 2.26 71.0 35.84 27,021.1 21,729.1
Avg. 24.77 2.24 67.8 36.24 27,327.6 22,131.2
95 SC‐12‐np2‐2s
1 24.75 2.29 65.0 35.16 26,512.3 21,551.1
2 24.75 2.28 69.8 34.89 26,303.7 21,191.6
Avg. 24.75 2.28 67.4 35.02 26,408.0 21,371.4
96 SC‐12‐np2‐1s
1 24.75 2.28 64.9 34.19 25,779.7 20,958.8
2 24.75 2.28 68.6 34.26 25,832.8 20,862.3
Avg. 24.75 2.28 66.8 34.23 25,806.3 20,910.6
160 SC‐40‐np2‐2s
1 24.98 2.43 68.3 41.06 5,374.9 4,377.1
2 24.96 2.46 73.2 41.96 5,492.5 4,426.8
Avg. 24.97 2.44 70.7 41.51 5,433.7 4,401.9
93 SC‐12‐np2‐3s
1 24.91 2.56 66.0 34.12 4,466.5 3,637.4
2 24.86 2.62 70.3 35.67 4,669.6 3,761.7
Avg. 24.88 2.59 68.1 34.90 4,568.0 3,699.5
86 SC‐12‐fb1‐3s
1 24.50 2.20 60.3 29.66 34,937.8 28,395.7
2 24.44 2.19 63.7 30.14 35,509.1 28,606.3
Avg. 24.47 2.20 62.0 29.90 35,223.4 28,501.0
87 SC‐12‐fb1‐4s
1 24.50 2.15 60.2 32.31 38,065.0 30,951.0
2 24.49 2.17 60.4 31.51 37,119.6 30,153.7
Avg. 24.49 2.16 60.3 31.91 37,592.3 30,552.4
88 SC‐12‐fb1‐5s
1 24.51 2.21 61.3 29.51 34,762.4 28,211.1
2 24.51 2.19 63.6 31.34 36,918.9 29,822.7
Avg. 24.51 2.20 62.4 30.42 35,840.6 29,016.9
1 24.29 2.38 62.5 26.77 31,542.9 25,258.9
90 RRFB‐SC142‐1‐00s 2 24.32 2.45 63.0 27.04 31,851.6 25,492.1
Avg. 24.30 2.41 62.8 26.91 31,697.2 25,375.5
Section 2 ‐ Page 6
Table 6; Scrubber Flow Rate Results Summary (Continued)
Run Stack Press. Moisture Stack Gas Velocity Flow Rate Flow RatePermit No. Equipment ID No. (in. Hg) (%) Temp (oF) (fps) (acfm) (dscfm)
91 RRFB‐SC142‐2‐00s
1 24.38 2.39 62.5 25.40 29,920.4 24,051.3
2 24.38 2.36 62.0 24.86 29,285.0 23,566.2
Avg. 24.38 2.37 62.3 25.13 29,602.7 23,808.8
94 SC‐12‐fd1‐3s
1 25.21 2.15 59.1 23.27 27,418.0 22,993.4
2 24.52 2.18 61.0 25.50 30,046.0 24,412.4
Avg. 24.87 2.16 60.0 24.39 28,732.0 23,702.9
97 SC‐12‐fd1‐6s
1 24.39 2.13 57.0 23.37 27,535.8 22,434.9
2 24.44 2.16 58.0 23.79 28,031.9 22,832.6
Avg. 24.41 2.15 57.5 23.58 27,783.8 22,633.8
37 RRGC‐SC‐12‐GC1‐1s
1 24.74 3.29 69.0 21.27 2,646.6 2,112.5
2 24.80 3.25 76.1 21.75 2,706.2 2,137.1
Avg. 24.77 3.27 72.5 21.51 2,676.4 2,124.8
151 RRGC‐SC‐133‐3‐100s
1 24.74 2.56 69.0 31.03 3,290.6 2,645.7
2 24.80 2.67 75.4 32.22 3,416.4 2,717.7
Avg. 24.77 2.62 72.2 31.63 3,353.5 2,681.7
152 RRGC‐SC‐12‐GC1‐2s
1 24.91 2.86 66.0 25.11 3,205.8 2,602.8
2 24.92 2.86 72.0 23.53 3,003.6 2,412.0
Avg. 24.92 2.86 69.0 24.32 3,104.7 2,507.4
153 RRGC‐SC‐133‐4‐100s
1 24.92 2.58 66.0 23.97 2,541.2 2,069.5
2 24.93 2.78 77.0 25.18 2,670.1 2,126.7
Avg. 24.92 2.68 71.5 24.57 2,605.6 2,098.1
46 sc‐12‐lt2‐1s
1 24.65 2.65 63.8 30.40 22,921.8 18,534.6
2 24.65 2.65 70.0 31.02 23,386.0 18,686.8
Avg. 24.65 2.65 66.9 30.71 23,153.9 18,610.7
53 sc‐12‐lt2‐2s 1 24.70 2.18 62.8 30.93 23,319.9 19,019.5
2 24.72 2.22 67.1 31.93 24,078.2 19,486.9
Avg. 24.71 2.20 64.9 31.43 23,699.1 19,253.2
4 sc‐12‐lt2‐3s
1 24.65 2.24 63.3 48.66 36,688.5 29,820.5
2 24.65 2.20 69.5 49.12 37,034.5 29,756.9
Avg. 24.65 2.22 66.4 48.89 36,861.5 29,788.7
45a/45b sc‐40‐lt2‐1s/sc‐40‐lt2‐
2s
1 24.72 2.08 71.0 45.43 4,817.4 3,874.9
2 24.77 2.25 64.1 48.83 5,177.0 4,219.7
Avg. 24.74 2.17 67.6 47.13 4,997.2 4,047.3
Section 2 ‐ Page 7
B. RCTO FID Measurement Results
The RCTO emissions summary in terms of tons per year is provided in Table 7. Individual RCTO emission
rate results are provided in Table 8 through Table 14. RCTO flow rates results are provided in Table 15.
All RCTO abatement systems have separate concentrator rotor (RO) and thermal oxidizer (TO) exhausts.
Concurrent measurements of TO and RO exhaust stacks were conducted to quantify emissions for each
Unit. The VOC (FID measured) overall averages reported in the individual RCTO emission rate tables,
used the documented one minute measured concentration values derived from the entire monitoring
period and not the one hour block average values for each RCTO test run reported in the Table. Hourly
values are reported to demonstrate variability over the 8 hour test run for each system.
Table 7; RCTO Annual Emissions Estimate Summary
Permit No. Equipment ID VOC (tpy)
162 RRNP VOC138‐1‐120 0.59
163 RRNP VOC138‐2‐120 0.35
164 RRNP VOC138‐3‐120 0.42
167 F11B VOC138‐2‐120 0.16
168 F11B VOC138‐1‐120 0.64
170 F11B VOC138‐2‐120 0.07
171 F11B VOC138‐1‐120 0.11
Total 2.34
Table 8; RCTO Permit ID 162 (RRNP‐VOC138‐1‐120) Emission Results; 07/23/2014
Test Total RCTO Running TO VOC RO VOC TO Emissions RO Emissions Emissions Hour Start Time Ending Time (ppm as C3H8) (ppm as C3H8) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)
1 07:45 08:45 0.12 1.81 0.001 0.13 0.13
2 08:45 09:45 0.10 1.94 0.001 0.14 0.14
3 09:45 10:45 0.21 1.91 0.002 0.13 0.14
4 10:45 11:45 0.21 1.82 0.002 0.13 0.13
5 11:45 12:45 0.27 2.14 0.002 0.15 0.15
6 12:45 13:45 0.25 1.98 0.002 0.14 0.14
7 13:45 14:45 0.23 1.69 0.002 0.12 0.12
8 14:45 15:45 0.20 1.80 0.002 0.13 0.13
Average 0.20 1.89 0.002 0.13 0.14
Section 2 ‐ Page 8
Table 9; RCTO Permit ID 163 (RRNP‐VOC138‐2‐120) Emissions Results 07/23/2014
Test Total RCTO Running TO VOC RO VOC TO Emissions RO Emissions Emissions Hour Start Time Ending Time (ppm as C3H8) (ppm as C3H8) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)
1 08:40 09:40 0.26 0.97 0.002 0.08 0.08
2 09:40 10:40 0.25 0.96 0.002 0.08 0.08
3 10:40 11:40 0.25 0.93 0.002 0.08 0.08
4 11:40 12:40 0.28 1.08 0.002 0.09 0.09
5 12:40 13:40 0.30 1.01 0.002 0.08 0.09
6 13:40 14:40 0.23 0.85 0.002 0.07 0.07
7 14:40 15:40 0.24 0.84 0.002 0.07 0.07
8 15:40 16:40 0.27 0.80 0.002 0.07 0.07
Average 0.26 0.93 0.002 0.08 0.08
Table 10; RCTO Permit ID 164 (RRNP‐VOC138‐3‐120) Emissions Results 07/23/2014
Test Total RCTO Running TO VOC RO VOC TO Emissions RO Emissions Emissions Hour Start Time Ending Time (ppm as C3H8) (ppm as C3H8) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)
1 09:15 10:15 0.00 1.26 0.000 0.10 0.10
2 10:15 11:15 0.00 1.33 0.000 0.10 0.10
3 11:15 12:15 0.00 1.25 0.000 0.10 0.10
4 12:15 13:15 0.00 1.47 0.000 0.11 0.11
5 13:15 14:15 0.00 1.05 0.000 0.08 0.08
6 14:15 15:15 0.00 1.20 0.000 0.09 0.09
7 15:15 16:15 0.00 1.28 0.000 0.10 0.10
8 16:15 17:15 0.00 1.02 0.000 0.08 0.08
Average 0.00 1.23 0.000 0.10 0.10
Table 11; RCTO Permit ID 167 (F11B‐VOC138‐2‐120) Emissions Results 08/15/2014
Test Total RCTO Running TO VOC RO VOC TO Emissions RO Emissions Emissions Hour Start Time Ending Time (ppm as C3H8) (ppm as C3H8) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)
1 06:30 07:30 0.63 0.34 0.004 0.01 0.02
2 07:30 08:30 0.57 0.25 0.004 0.01 0.01
3 08:30 09:30 0.46 2.29 0.003 0.09 0.09
4 9:30 10:30 0.49 0.31 0.003 0.01 0.02
5 10:30 11:30 0.53 0.85 0.004 0.03 0.04
6 11:30 12:30 0.38 0.91 0.003 0.03 0.04
7 12:30 13:30 0.33 0.85 0.002 0.03 0.03
8 13:30 14:31 0.28 1.01 0.002 0.04 0.04
Average 0.46 0.85 0.003 0.03 0.04
Section 2 ‐ Page 9
Table 12; RCTO Permit ID 168(F11B‐VOC138‐1‐120) Emissions Results 08/15/2014
Test Total RCTO Running TO VOC RO VOC TO Emissions RO Emissions Emissions Hour Start Time Ending Time (ppm as C3H8) (ppm as C3H8) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)
1 06:51 07:51 0.04 0.68 0.000 0.03 0.03
2 07:51 08:51 0.03 0.68 0.000 0.03 0.03
3 08:51 09:51 0.03 2.82 0.000 0.10 0.10
4 09:51 10:51 0.01 0.66 0.000 0.02 0.02
5 10:51 11:51 0.00 0.64 0.000 0.02 0.02
6 11:51 12:51 0.00 0.60 0.000 0.02 0.02
7 12:51 13:51 0.00 0.54 0.000 0.02 0.02
8 13:51 14:51 0.00 0.54 0.000 0.02 0.02
Average 0.00 0.90 0.113 0.03 0.15
Table 13; RCTO Permit ID 170 (F11F‐VOC138‐2‐120) Emissions Results 08/18/2014
Test Total RCTO Running TO VOC RO VOC TO Emissions RO Emissions Emissions Hour Start Time Ending Time (ppm as C3H8) (ppm as C3H8) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)
1 07:04 08:04 0.05 0.54 0.000 0.03 0.03
2 08:04 09:04 0.03 0.49 0.000 0.03 0.03
3 09:04 10:04 0.00 0.40 0.000 0.02 0.02
4 10:04 11:04 0.00 0.34 0.000 0.02 0.02
5 11:04 12:04 0.00 0.27 0.000 0.01 0.01
6 12:04 13:04 0.00 0.21 0.000 0.01 0.01
7 13:04 14:04 0.00 0.13 0.000 0.01 0.01
8 14:04 15:05 0.00 0.08 0.000 0.00 0.00
Average 0.00 0.31 0.000 0.02 0.02
Table 14; RCTO Permit ID 171 (F11F‐VOC138‐1‐120) Emissions Results 08/18/2014
Test Total RCTO Running TO VOC RO VOC TO Emissions RO Emissions Emissions Hour Start Time Ending Time (ppm as C3H8) (ppm as C3H8) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr) (lbs/hr)
1 06:40 07:40 0.05 0.63 0.000 0.03 0.03
2 07:40 08:40 0.05 0.59 0.000 0.03 0.03
3 08:40 09:40 0.05 0.55 0.000 0.03 0.03
4 09:40 10:40 0.06 0.50 0.000 0.03 0.03
5 10:40 11:40 0.05 0.47 0.000 0.02 0.02
6 11:40 12:40 0.05 0.47 0.000 0.02 0.02
7 12:40 13:40 0.04 0.39 0.000 0.02 0.02
8 13:40 14:41 0.05 0.39 0.000 0.02 0.02
Average 0.05 0.50 0.000 0.03 0.03
Section 2 ‐ Page 10
Table 15; RCTO Flow Rate Summary Results
Permit Equipment ID Stack Press. Moisture Stack Gas Velocity Flow Rate Flow Rate No. (in. Hg) (%) Temp (oF) (fps) (acfm) (dscfm)
162
RRNP‐VOC138‐1‐120‐TO 24.82 5.56% 782.8 34.63 3,570 1,188
RRNP‐VOC138‐1‐120‐RO 24.27 1.26% 93.4 26.40 13,311 10,170
Total ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 16,881 11,358
163
RRNP‐VOC138‐2‐120‐TO 24.83 4.98% 711.3 27.85 2,871 1,021
RRNP‐VOC138‐2‐120‐RO 24.27 1.24% 86.9 29.13 15,541 12,018
Total ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 18,412 13,309
164
RRNP‐VOC138‐3‐120‐TO 24.83 4.87% 688.3 28.67 2,955 1,073
RRNP‐VOC138‐3‐120‐RO 24.27 1.23% 111.3 29.13 14,920 11,047
Total ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 17,875 12,120
167
F11B VOC138‐2‐120‐TO 24.77 6.27% 704.9 28.07 2,853 1,004
F11B VOC138‐2‐120‐RO 24.29 1.24% 80.8 13.79 6,999 5,478
Total ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9,852 6,482
168
F11B VOC138‐1‐120‐TO 24.77 5.98% 720.1 28.26 2,873 1,001
F11B VOC138‐1‐120‐RO 24.29 1.27% 83.4 13.36 6,777 6,278
Total ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9,650 7,279
170
F11F VOC138‐2‐120‐TO 24.65 5.78% 741.3 29.44 3,035 1,036
F11F VOC138‐2‐120‐RO 24.20 1.17% 88.8 18.71 9,583 7,371
Total ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 12,618 8,407
171
F11F VOC138‐1‐120‐TO 24.66 5.74% 745.1 30.43 3,138 1,068
F11F VOC138‐1‐120‐RO 24.20 1.23% 86.8 18.34 9,392 7,243
Total ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 12,530 8,311
Section 2 ‐ Page 11
/. Unit Operating Parameters
Specific operating parameters are company business confidential information (CBI) and are being
submitted under separate cover.
5. Control Equipment Operating Parameters
The recap of the abatement device control parameters identified in the Test Protocol is summarized for
the scrubber systems in Table 16. To demonstrate continuous scrubber operation, the permittee is
required to monitor the recirculation water flow rate (gallons per minute) and the fan status. The
average scrubber control parameters for recirculation water flow, fan status, and bypass status defined
during each test period are detailed below.
Table 16; Scrubber Control Parameters
Permit Equipment Start End Recirculation Flow rate (gpm) Bypass Fan
No. ID Time Time Avg Max Min Status Status
96 SC‐12‐np2‐1s 7/26/14 7:00 7/26/14 16:00 709.9 724.6 698.4 Off On
95 SC‐12‐np2‐2s 7/26/14 7:00 7/26/14 16:00 603.8 616.9 584.5 Off On
1 SC‐40‐np2‐3s 7/25/14 8:00 7/25/14 18:00 565.0 634.9 460.5 Off On
89 SC‐12‐np2‐4s 7/25/14 8:00 7/25/14 18:00 646.5 683.0 562.8 Off On
161* SC‐40‐np2‐1s 7/28/14 8:00 7/29/14 17:00 96.8 97.4 95.2 Off On
160 SC‐40‐np2‐2s 7/28/14 8:00 7/28/14 17:00 68.9 72.5 65.5 Off On
93 SC‐12‐np2‐3s 7/29/14 8:00 7/29/14 17:00 112.7 124.4 98.7 Off On
85 SC‐12‐fb1‐2s 7/31/14 8:00 7/31/14 19:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Off Off
86 SC‐12‐fb1‐3s 7/31/14 8:00 7/31/14 18:00 495.6 506.8 480.8 Off On
87 SC‐12‐fb1‐4s 7/31/14 8:00 7/31/14 19:00 521.1 546.0 491.1 Off On
88 SC‐12‐fb1‐5s 8/02/14 8:00 8/02/14 17:00 606.3 675.0 382.1 Off On
94 SC‐12‐fd1‐3s 8/05/14 6:00 8/05/14 15:00 595.3 603.1 588.8 Off On
97 SC‐12‐fd1‐6s 8/07/14 6:00 8/07/14 16:00 580.2 596.4 561.7 Off On
90 RRFB‐SC142‐1‐00s 8/02/14 8:00 8/06/14 15:00 481.5 497.1 468.3 Off On
91 RRFB‐SC142‐2‐00s 8/02/14 8:00 8/02/14 17:00 454.5 481.9 435.5 Off On
92 RRFD‐SC142‐1‐00s 8/02/14 8:00 8/06/14 15:00 0.2 0.2 0.2 Off Off
37 RRGC‐SC‐12‐GC1‐1s 8/09/14 7:00 8/09/14 16:00 160.8 171.4 149.2 Off On
152 RRGC‐SC‐12‐GC1‐2s 8/11/14 7:00 8/11/14 17:00 80.7 81.7 80.0 Off On
151 RRGC‐SC‐133‐3‐100s 8/09/14 6:00 8/09/14 16:00 85.0 93.6 71.3 Off On
153 RRGC‐SC‐133‐4‐100s 8/11/14 7:00 8/11/14 17:00 83.6 88.6 75.7 Off On
46 SC‐12‐lt2‐1s 8/20/14 7:00 8/20/14 17:00 698.9 772.3 618.3 Off On
4 SC‐12‐lt2‐3s 8/20/14 7:00 8/20/14 17:00 508.5 589.2 587.8 Off On
53 SC‐12‐lt2‐2s 8/21/14 7:00 8/21/14 16:00 588.4 543.1 472.0 Off On
45a SC‐40‐lt2‐1s 8/22/14 7:00 8/22/14 16:00 95.4 99.8 86.5 Off On
45b SC‐40‐lt2‐2s 8/22/14 7:00 8/22/14 16:00 77.2 82.4 66.2 Off On
*Scrubber 161 was in a redundant readiness state, Fan at 20% RPM setpoint to keep motor turning but not move air against the closed dampers. Recirc flow was kept active to support water quality and readiness for redundancy.
Section 2 ‐ Page 12
The RCTO control parameters TO chamber temperature, inlet damper positions, and system bypass
damper position are provided in Table 17. The TO chamber temperature is used to confirm compliance
with Permit 0325‐M11‐R5 Condition A801.A, that defines that the …”permittee shall ensure that the
combustion chamber remains at 1385°F plus or minus 50°F on a 24 hour block average when the unit is
in operation”…, further the inlet damper position, bypass damper position, and temperature are
required to be documented to demonstrate that a unit is in operation. All data recorded demonstrated
the systems met these permit conditions.
Table 17; RCTO Control Parameters
Bypass Permit Equipment Start Stop TO Chamber Temperature Fan Damper No. No. Time Time Avg(°F) Max(°F) Min(°F) Status Position
162 RRNP‐VOC138‐1‐120 7/23/14 7:00 7/23/14 16:00 1384.0 1385.6 1382.3 Normal Off
163 RRNP‐VOC138‐2‐120 7/23/14 8:00 7/23/14 17:00 1385.0 1386.9 1383.6 Normal Off
164 RRNP‐VOC138‐3‐120 7/23/14 9:00 7/23/14 18:00 1385.1 1386.3 1383.4 Normal Off
167 F11B VOC138‐2‐120 8/15/14 6:00 8/15/14 15:00 1375.0 1376.2 1373.9 Normal Off
168 F11B VOC138‐1‐120 8/15/14 6:00 8/15/14 15:00 1375.2 1376.9 1373.8 Normal Off
170 F11F VOC138‐2‐120 8/18/14 6:00 8/18/14 15:00 1375.1 1375.7 1374.3 Normal Off
171 F11F VOC138‐1‐120 8/18/14 6:00 8/18/14 15:00 1374.8 1375.5 1375.5 Normal Off
E. Comparison of Measured and Modeled Parameters
The comparison of modeled versus measured parameters is not applicable to this test program
F. Relative Detection Limits of Measured Compounds
Detection limits for the scrubber FT‐IR measurement system used in support of the quantification and
reporting of the compounds of interest is provided in Table 18. The FT‐IR process supports spectral
residual analyses that resolves (quantifies) the identified compounds.
Table 18; HAP and Target Detection Limits for Measurement Program
COMPOUND MDL (*). Units
HCl 417 ppb
HF 145 ppb
(*) In the source specific measurements, if the measurements result in a combination of detected and ND values within the eight (8) hour FTIR measurement period, the stack average concentration for the test is reported by treating the ND readings as ½ MDL. Sources that report an “ND” for the test run average did not have any pollutant detection (HCL or HF) through the entire 8 hour run period for that source.
Section 2 ‐ Page 13
ERM has over 100 offices across the following countries worldwide Argentina Malaysia Australia Mexico Belgium The Netherlands Brazil Peru Canada Poland Chile Portugal China Puerto Rico Colombia Russia Ecuador Singapore France South Africa Germany Spain Hong Kong Sweden Hungary Taiwan India Thailand Indonesia UK Ireland United Arab Emirates Italy US Japan Vietnam Kazakhstan Venezuela Korea Environmental Resources Management
6455 S. Yosemite St. Suite 900 Greenwood Village, Co 80111 (303) 741‐5050 (303) 773‐2624 (FAX) http://www.erm.com