united nations development programme
DESCRIPTION
United Nations Development Programme. UNDP Procedures for Climate Change Enabling Activities UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila, 26-30 April 2004. Content GEF Operational Procedures - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
UNDP Procedures for Climate Change Enabling Activities
UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties
Manila, 26-30 April 2004
United Nations Development Programme
Content• GEF Operational Procedures• UNDP procedures for climate change enabling
activities• Status of requests of self-assessment• UNDP experience on processing requests
GEF Operational Procedures
• New procedures based on experience from support provided for INC
• Facilitate broader stakeholder consultations and participation in project proposal
• Build on previous work, activities, and knowledge, capturing best practices and develop linkages with other relevant projects
Immediate support of up to $15,000 for the preparatory exercise of NC project proposal
GEF Operational Procedures
• Countries to have submitted INC and substantially completed top-up before SNC can begin
• Self-assessment required; brief report to be included in NC proposal
• NC proposal requires endorsement from GEF OFP and UNFCCC NFP
• SNC and NAPA in parallel is possible
• Countries to submit final draft NC and technical reports to IAs
Self-assessment: Stocktaking and stakeholders consultation
• $15,000 available from GEF• Consists of:
– National stock-taking exercise– Stakeholder consultations
• Output: – project document– workplan with indicators
• Must include as annex to NC proposal• Endorsed by GEF OFP
Climate Change Enabling Activity
• Up to $420,000* (under expedited route)• Endorsed by GEF OFP and UNFCCC NFP• Consists of:
– Project proposal– Workplan with indicators
• Inception workshop to refine workplan, terms of reference of studies, implementation arrangements
• Recommended $ allocations among main components of NC
• Outputs: – National Communication– Technical reports
* Of which $15,000 for self-assessment
UNDP Procedures
• UNDP country office is the main focal point between national government and UNDP-GEF
• GEF Operational Focal Point submits a letter of request for the self-assessment to UNDP accompanied by a brief funding proposal
– Templates available for request letter and self-assessment proposal
UNDP Procedures
• UNDP country office works with the GEF Regional Coordination Unit and HQ to review the proposal
• Country to receive recommendations for changes, if needed. Otherwise the proposal is approved
• If changes are needed, UNDP-GEF provides recommendations. UNDP country office works with the government to submit a revised proposal
UNDP Procedures
• Upon approval of the proposal, authorization (DOA) is issued to UNDP country office to establish a new project and disburse the $15,000
• Total UNDP processing time for the $15,000 request: 15 working days maximum (from first submission by national GEF Operational Focal Point to issuing of the DOA
Key Documents for Project Proposals
• New GEF Operational Procedures
• UNDP templates and guidance for stocktaking exercise/stakeholder consultation and project proposal
• Revised UNFCCC Guidelines adopted at COP-8
• UNFCCC User Manual for the above guidelines
Website: http://www.undp.org/cc/ccea.htm
Status of self-assessment proposals
• Eastern Europe and CIS: 9 submitted, 8 approved– Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Georgia,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Macedonia, Tajikistan
• Latin American and Caribbean: 6 submitted, 5 approved – Bahamas, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Trinidad & Tobago
• Asia Pacific: 3 submitted and approved– Philippines, Samoa, Cook Islands
• Africa: 3 submitted, 1 approved– Benin, Niger, Nigeria
UNDP experience with self-assessment proposals
• Proposals have followed templates provided by UNDP
• Quality of first drafts have been acceptable in most cases, with minor changes needed
• Examples provided have proved to be useful
• Review process and completion of revised proposals have in most cases met stipulated deadlines
• Delays in funding disbursement were due to unexpected delay in CEO endorsement of umbrella project