unit-2 - fmea
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
1/94
FMEA
Failure Mode Effects Analysis
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
2/94
y
Quality and Reliability Quality is a relative term often based on customer
perception or the degree to which a product meetscustomer expectations
Manufacturers have long recognized that products
can meet specifications and still fail to satisfy
customer expectations due to
!Errors in design
!Flaws induced by the manufacturing process
!Environment
!"roduct misuse
!#ot understanding customer wants$needs
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
3/94
Quality% Reliability and Failure
"revention &raditionally 'uality activities have focused
on detecting manufacturing and materialdefects that cause failures early in the life
cycle
&oday% activities focus on failures that
occur beyond the infant mortality stage
Emphasis on Failure Prevention
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
4/94
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
5/94
Failure Mode ( Effects Analysis
)FMEA* FMEA is a systematic method of identifying and
preventing system% product and process problemsbefore they occur
FMEA is focused on preventing problems%enhancing safety% and increasing customersatisfaction
+deally% FMEA,s are conducted in the productdesign or process development stages% althoughconducting an FMEA on existing products or
processes may also yield benefits
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
6/94
FMEA$FME-A .istory &he history of FMEA$FME-A goes bac/ to
the early 0123s and 0143s5! 6575 #avy 8ureau of Aeronautics% followed by
the 8ureau of #aval 9eapons
!#ational Aeronautics and 7paceAdministration )#A7A*
:epartment of :efense developed andrevised the M+;
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
7/94
FMEA$FME-A .istory (continued)
Ford Motor -ompany published instructionmanuals in the 01?3s and the automotive
industry collectively developed standards in
the 0113s5 Engineers in a variety of industries have
adopted and adapted the tool over the years5
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
8/94
"ublished @uidelines 0>B1from the SAE for the automotive
industry.
A+A@ FMEA
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
9/94
Cther @uidelines
Cther industry and company
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
10/94
FMEA is a &ool
FMEA is a tool that allows you to
!"revent 7ystem% "roduct and "rocess problemsbefore they occur
!reduce costs by identifying system% product and
process improvements early in the developmentcycle
!-reate more robust processes
!"rioritize actions that decrease ris/ of failure
!Evaluate the system%design and processes from a
new vantage point
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
11/94
A 7ystematic "rocess
FMEA provides a systematic process to
! +dentify and evaluate
potential failure modes
potential causes of the failure mode
! +dentify and 'uantify the impact of potential failures
! +dentify and prioritize actions to reduce or eliminate
the potential failure
! +mplement action plan based on assigned
responsibilities and completion dates
! :ocument the associated activities
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
12/94
"urpose$8enefit
cost effective tool for maximizing anddocumenting the collective /nowledge%experience% and insights of the engineeringand manufacturing community
format for communication across thedisciplines
provides logical% se'uential steps forspecifying product and process areas ofconcern
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
13/94
8enefits of FMEA
-ontributes to improved designs for products andprocesses5
! .igher reliability
! 8etter 'uality
! +ncreased safety! Enhanced customer satisfaction
-ontributes to cost savings5
! :ecreases development time and re
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
14/94
8enefits
-ost benefits associated with FMEA are usuallyexpected to come from the ability to identify failuremodes earlier in the process% when they are lessexpensive to address5! rule of ten
+f the issue costs G033 when it is discovered inthe field% thenD
+t may cost G03 if discovered during the finaltestD
8ut it may cost G0 if discovered during anincoming inspection5
Even better it may cost G3503 if discoveredduring the design or process engineering phase5
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
15/94
FMEA as .istorical Record
-ommunicate the logic of the
engineers and related design and
process considerations
Are indispensable resources for new
engineers and future design and
process decisions5
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
16/94
7ystem :esign "rocess
-omponents
7ubsystems
Main 7ystems
-omponents
7ubsystems
Main 7ystems
ManpowerMachine
Method
Material
Measurement
Environment
Machines
&ools%
9or/ 7tations%
"roduction ;ines%
Cperator &raining%
"rocesses%
@auges
Focus
Minimize failureeffects on the
7ystem
CbHectives$@oal
Maximize 7ystemQuality% reliability%
-ost and
maintenance
Focus
Minimize failureeffects on the
:esign
CbHectives$@oal
Maximize :esignQuality% reliability%
-ost and
maintenance
Focus
Minimize failure
effects on the
"rocesses
CbHectives$@oal
Maximize
&otal "rocess
Quality% reliability%
-ost and
maintenance
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
17/94
9hy do FMEA,sI
Examine the system for failures5
Ensure the specs are clear and assure the
product wor/s correctly
+7C re'uirement
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
18/94
9hat tools are available to meet
our obHectiveI 8enchmar/ing
customer warranty reports
design chec/list or guidelines
field complaints internal failure analysis
internal test standards
lessons learned
returned material reports
Expert /nowledge
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
19/94
9hat are possible outcomesI
Actual$potential failure modes
customer and legal design re'uirements
duty cycle re'uirements
product functions
/ey product characteristics
"roduct Jerification and Jalidation
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
20/94
.ow to FmeaD&he "re
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
21/94
.ow to FMEA55 )cont5*
&he purpose of this meeting is to
!:etermine scope
!@ather bac/ground reference material
!-reate update bloc/ diagrams
!+dentify team members
!"repare an agenda% schedule% milestones
!+dentify item functions% failure modes andtheir effects
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
22/94
Assumptions of :FMEA
All systems$components are manufactured
and assembled as specified by design
Failure could% but will not necessarily%
occur
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
23/94
:esign FMEA Format
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
D
e
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
O
c
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
C
l
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
D
e
t
ec
Current
Controls
O
c
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
C
l
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
%unction
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
24/94
@eneral
Every FMEA should have an assumptions document
attached )electronically if possible* or the first line of theFMEA should detail the assumptions and ratings used for the
FMEA5
"roduct$part names and numbers must be detailed in the
FMEA headerAll team members must be listed in the FMEA header
Revision date% as appropriate% must be documented in the
FMEA header
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
D
e
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
O
c
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
C
l
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
D
e
t
ec
Current
Controls
O
c
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
C
l
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
25/94
Function
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
26/94
Function
EKAM";E
.JA- system must defog windows and heat or cool cabin to >3
degrees in all operating conditions )
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
27/94
"otential Failure mode
:efinition the manner in which a system%subsystem% or component could potentially fail tomeet design intent
As/ yourself< .ow could this design fail to meeteach customer re'uirementI
Remember to consider! absolute failure
!partial failure! intermittent failure
! over function
! degraded function
! unintended function
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
28/94
Failure Mode
EKAM";E7
.JA- system does not heat vehicle or defog windows
.JA- system ta/es more than 2 minutes to heat vehicle
.JA- system does not heat cabin to >3 degrees in belowzero temperatures
.JA- system cools cabin to 23 degrees
.JA- system activates rear window defogger
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
D
e
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
O
c
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
C
l
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
D
e
t
ec
Current
Controls
O
c
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
C
l
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
id i l f il d
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
29/94
-onsider "otential failure modes
under Cperating -onditions
! hot and cold
! wet and dry
! dusty and dirty 6sage
! Above average life cycle
! .arsh environment
!below average life cycle
- id i l f il d
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
30/94
-onsider "otential failure modes
under +ncorrect service operations
! -an the wrong part be substituted inadvertentlyI
! -an the part be serviced wrongI E5g5 upside down%
bac/wards% end to end
! -an the part be omittedI
! +s the part difficult to assembleI
:escribe or record in physical or technical terms%
not as symptoms noticeable by the customer5
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
31/94
"otential Effect)s* of Failure
:efinition effects of the failure mode on the function as
perceived by the customer
As/ yourself< 9hat would be the result of this failureI
or +f the failure occurs then what are the conse'uences
:escribe the effects in terms of what the customer might
experience or notice
7tate clearly if the function could impact safety or
noncompliance to regulations +dentify all potential customers5 &he customer may be an
internal customer% a distributor as well as an end user
:escribe in terms of product performance
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
32/94
Effect)s* of Failure
EKAM";E
-annot see out of front window
Air conditioner ma/es cab too cold
:oes not get warm enough&a/es too long to heat up
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
D
e
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
O
c
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
C
l
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
D
e
t
ec
Current
Controls
O
c
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
C
l
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
33/94
Examples of "otential Effects
#oise
loss of fluid
seizure of adHacent
surfaces loss of function
no$low output
loss of system
+ntermittent operations
rough surface
unpleasant odor
poor appearance
potential safety hazard
-ustomer dissatisfied
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
34/94
7everity
:efinition assessment of the seriousness of
the effect)s* of the potential failure mode on
the next component% subsystem% or
customer if it occurs 7everity applies to effects
For failure modes with multiple effects% rate
each effect and select the highest rating asseverity for failure mode
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
35/94
7everity
EKAM";E
-annot see out of front window ! severity 1
Air conditioner ma/es cab too cold ! severity 2
:oes not get warm enough ! severity 2&a/es too long to heat up ! severity L
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
Current
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
36/94
-lassification
-lassification should be used to define potential critical and significantcharacteristics
-ritical characteristics )1 or 03 in severity with = or more in occurrence
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
37/94
"otential -ause)s*$Mechanism)s* of
failure
:efinition an indication of a design
wea/ness% the conse'uence of which is the
failure mode
Every conceivable failure cause ormechanism should be listed
Each cause or mechanism should be listed
as concisely and completely as possible soefforts can be aimed at pertinent causes
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
38/94
-ause)s* of Failure
EKAM";E+ncorrect location of vents
+ncorrect routing of vent hoses )too close to heat
source*+nade'uate coolant capacity for application
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
Current
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
" t ti l - M h i
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
39/94
"otential -ause Mechanism &olerance build up
insufficient material insufficient lubrication capacity
Jibration
Foreign Material
+nterference
+ncorrect Material thic/ness specified
exposed location
temperature expansion
inade'uate diameter
+nade'uate maintenance instruction Cver
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
40/94
Cccurrence
:efinition li/elihood that a specific
cause$mechanism will occur
8e consistent when assigning occurrence
Removing or controlling the
cause$mechanism though a design change is
only way to reduce the occurrence rating
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
41/94
Cccurrence
EKAM";E
+ncorrect location of vents ! occurrence B
+ncorrect routing of vent hoses )too close to
heat source* ! occurrence 4+nade'uate coolant capacity for application !
occurrence =
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
CurrentOc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
42/94
-urrent :esign -ontrols :efinition activities which will assure the design ade'uacy
for the failure cause$mechanism under consideration -onfidence -urrent :esign -ontrols will detect cause and
subse'uent failure mode prior to production% and$or willprevent the cause from occurring
! +f there are more than one control% rate each and select the lowest forthe detection rating
-ontrol must be allocated in the plan to be listed% otherwiseit,s a recommended action
B types of -ontrols
! 05 "revention from occurring or reduction of rate! =5 :etect cause mechanism and lead to corrective actions
! B5 :etect the failure mode% leading to corrective actions
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
43/94
-urrent :esign -ontrols
EKAM";E
Engineering specifications )"* ! preventive control
.istorical data )"* ! preventive control
Functional testing ):* ! detective control
@eneral vehicle durability ):* ! detective control
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
Current
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
44/94
Examples of -ontrols
&ype 0 control! 9arnings which alert
product user to
impending failure
! Fail$safe features
! :esign
procedures$guidelines$
specifications
&ype = and B controls! Road test
! :esign Review
! Environmental test! fleet test
! lab test
! field test
! life cycle test! load test
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
45/94
:etection
:etection values should correspond with A+A@% 7AE+f detection values are based upon internally defined criteria% a reference
must be included in FMEA to rating table with explanation for use:etection is the value assigned to each of the detective controls:etection values of 0 must eliminate the potential for failures due to design
deficiency
EKAM";EEngineering specifications ! no detection value.istorical data ! no detection valueFunctional testing ! detection B@eneral vehicle durability ! detection 2
DetectPrevent
RP
N
DE
T
OC
C
SE
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
TargetComplete
Date
RecommendedActions
R
P
N
D
e
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
O
c
c
ur
Potential
Cause(s!"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
C
l
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
RP
N
DE
T
OC
C
SE
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
RecommendedActions
R
P
N
D
e
t
ec
Current
Controls
O
c
c
ur
Potential
Cause(s!"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
C
l
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
46/94
R"# )Ris/ "riority #umber*
Ris/ "riority #umber is a multiplication of the severity%
occurrence and detection ratings;owest detection rating is used to determine R"#
R"# threshold should not be used as the primary trigger fordefinition of recommended actions
EKAM";E
-annot see out of front window ! severity 1% ! incorrect ventlocation ! =% Functional testing ! detection B% R"# < 2L
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
Current
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
47/94
Ris/ "riority #umber)R"#*
7everity x Cccurrence x :etection R"# is used to prioritize concerns$actions
&he greater the value of the R"# the greater theconcern
R"# ranges from 0
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
48/94
R"# -onsiderations Rating scale example
! 7everity 03 indicates that the effect is very
serious and is worse than 7everity 05
! Cccurrence 03 indicates that the li/elihood
of occurrence is very high and is worse thanCccurrence 05
! :etection 03 indicates that the failure is not
li/ely to be detected before it reaches the end
user and is worse than :etection 05
1 5 10
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
49/94
R"# -onsiderations (continued)
R"# ratings are relative to a particularanalysis5
!An R"# in one analysis is comparable to other
R"#s in the same analysis D
!D but an R"# may #C& be comparable to
R"#s in another analysis5
1 5 10
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
50/94
R"# -onsiderations (continued)
8ecause similar R"#s can result in severaldifferent ways )and represent different types
of ris/*% analysts often loo/ at the ratings in
other ways% such as!Cccurrence$7everity Matrix )7everity and
Cccurrence*5
!+ndividual ratings and various ran/ing tables5
1 5 10
d d A i
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
51/94
Recommended Actions
:efinition tas/s recommended for the purpose of
reducing any or all of the ran/ings
Cnly design revision can bring about a reduction in
the severity ran/ing
Examples of Recommended actions! "erform
:esigned experiments
reliability testing
finite element analysis
! Revise design
! Revise test plan
! Revise material specification
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
52/94
Recommended Actions
All critical or significant characteristics must have
recommended actions associated with themRecommended actions should be focused on design% and
directed toward mitigating the cause of failure% or eliminating the
failure mode
+f recommended actions cannot mitigate or eliminate thepotential for failure% recommended actions must force
characteristics to be forwarded to process FMEA for process
mitigation
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
Current
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
Responsibility ( &arget -ompletion
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
53/94
Responsibility ( &arget -ompletion
:ate
All recommended actions must have a person
assigned responsibility for completion of the action
Responsibility should be a name% not a title
"erson listed as responsible for an action must also be
listed as a team member
&here must be a completion date accompanying each
recommended action
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
Current
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
Action Results
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
54/94
Action Results
6nless the failure mode has been eliminated% severity
should not changeCccurrence may or may not be lowered based upon the
results of actions
:etection may or may not be lowered based upon theresults of actions
+f severity% occurrence or detection ratings are notimproved% additional recommended actions must to bedefined
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &Target
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
CurrentDesign
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
Potential
%ailure
"ode
tem
DetectPrevent
R
P
N
D
E
T
O
C
C
S
E
V
ActionTaken
Action ResultsResponse &
Complete
Date
Recommended
Actions
R
P
N
De
t
ec
Current
Controls
Oc
c
ur
PotentialCause(s!
"ec#anism(s
O$ %ailure
Cl
a
ss
S
e
v
Potential
E$$ect(s o$
%ailure
%unction
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
55/94
Exercise :esign FMEA
"erform A :FMEA on a pressure coo/er
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
56/94
Pressure Cooer Safety Features
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
57/94
Pressure Cooer Safety Features
05 7afety valve relieves pressure before itreaches dangerous levels5
=5 &hermostat opens circuit through heating
coil when the temperature rises above =23S-5
B5 "ressure gage is divided into green and
red sections5 T:angerT is indicated when thepointer is in the red section5
Pressure Cooer F!EA
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
58/94
Pressure Cooer F!EA
:efine 7cope
05 Resolution < &he analysis will be
restricted to the four maHor subsystems
)electrical system% safety valve% thermostat%and pressure gage*5
=5 Focus < 7afety
"ressure coo/er bloc/ diagram
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
59/94
"ressure coo/er bloc/ diagram
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
60/94
"rocess FMEA
:efinition!A documented analysis which begins with a
teams thoughts concerning re'uirements thatcould go wrong and ending with definedactions which should be implemented to help
prevent and$or detect problems and theircauses5
!A proactive tool to identify concerns with thesources of variation and then define and ta/ecorrective action5
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
61/94
"FMEA as a toolD
&o access ris/ or the li/elihood ofsignificant problem
&rouble shoot problems
@uide improvement aid in determining
where to spend time and money
-apture learning to retain and share
/nowledge and experience
Customer Re'uirements
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
62/94
Customer Re'uirements
Deign Speci$ications
e) Product C#aracteristics
"ac#ine Process Capa*ilit)
Process%lo+
Diagram
Process %"EAProcessControl
Plan
Operator,o*
nstructions
Con$orming Product
Reduced Variation
Customer Satis$action
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
63/94
+nputs for "MEA
"rocess flow diagram
Assembly instructions
:esign FMEA
-urrent engineering drawings and specifications :ata from similar processes
! 7crap
!Rewor/! :owntime
! 9arranty
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
64/94
"rocess Function Re'uirement
8rief description of the manufacturingprocess or operation
&he "FMEA should follow the actual wor/
process or se'uence% same as the processflow diagram
8egin with a verb
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
65/94
&eam Members for a "FMEA
"rocess engineer Manufacturing supervisor
Cperators
Quality 7afety
"roduct engineer
-ustomers 7uppliers
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
66/94
"FMEA Assumptions
&he design is valid
All incoming product is to design
specifications
Failures can but will not necessarily occur
:esign failures are not covered in a
"FMEA% they should have been part of the
design FMEA
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
67/94
"otentional Failure Mode
.ow the process or product may fail tomeet design or 'uality re'uirements
Many process steps or operations will have
multiple failure modes &hin/ about what has gone wrong from past
experience and what could go wrong
il d
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
68/94
-ommon Failure Modes
Assembly! Missing parts
! :amaged
! Crientation
! -ontamination
! Cff location
&or'ue
! ;oose or over tor'ue! Missing fastener
! -ross threaded
Machining! &oo narrow
! &oo deep
! Angle incorrect
! Finish not to
specification
! Flash or not cleaned
i l f il d
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
69/94
"otentional failure modes
7ealant! Missing
! 9rong material
applied
! +nsufficient or
excessive material
! dry
:rilling holes! Missing
! ;ocation
! :eep or shallow
! Cver$under size
! -oncentricity
! angle
" i l ff
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
70/94
"otential effects
&hin/ of what the customer will experience!End customer
!#ext user
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
71/94
"otential Effects
End user!#oise
! ;ea/age
! Cdor
! "oor appearance
! Endangers safety
! ;oss of a primary
function!performance
#ext operation! -annot assemble
! -annot tap or bore
! -annot connect
! -annot fasten
! :amages e'uipment
! :oes not fit
! :oes not match! Endangers operator
7 i R /i
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
72/94
7everity Ran/ing .ow the effects of a potential failure mode may
impact the customer Cnly applies to the effect and is assigned with
regard to any other rating
"otential effects offailure
7everity
-annot assemblebolt)2*
Endangersoperator)03*
Jibration )4*
03
&a/e the highest effectran/ing
-l ifi i
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
73/94
-lassification
6se this column to identify any re'uirementthat may re'uire additional process control
!UV-U < /ey characteristic
!UFU ! fit or function!U7U < safety
!Pour company may have a different symbol
" t ti l -
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
74/94
"otential -auses
-ause indicates all the things that may beresponsible for a failure mode5
-auses should items that can have actioncompleted at the root cause level )controllable in
the process* Every failure mode may have multiple causeswhich creates a new row on the FMEA
Avoid using operator dependent statements i5e5operator error use the specific error such asoperator incorrectly located part or operatorcross threaded part
" t ti l -
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
75/94
"otential -auses
E'uipment! &ool wear
! +nade'uate pressure
! 9orn locator
! 8ro/en tool
! @auging out of
calibration
! +nade'uate fluid levels
Cperator! +mproper tor'ue
! 7elected wrong part
! +ncorrect tooling
! +ncorrect feed or speed
rate
! Mishandling
! Assembled upsidedown
! Assembled bac/wards
C R /i
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
76/94
Cccurrence Ran/ing
.ow fre'uent the cause is li/ely to occur
6se other data available
!"ast assembly processes
!7"-
!9arranty
Each cause should be ran/ed according to
the guideline
- t " - t l
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
77/94
-urrent "rocess -ontrols
All controls should be listed% but ran/ing shouldoccur on detection controls only
;ist the controls chronologically
! :on not include controls that are outside of your plant :ocument both types of process controls
! "reventative< before the part is made
"revent the cause% use error proofing at the source
! :etection< after the part is made :etect the cause )mista/e proof*
:etect the failure mode by inspection
" - t l
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
78/94
"rocess -ontrols
"reventative! 7"-
! +nspection verification
! 9or/ instructions
! Maintenance
! Error proof by design
! Method sheets
! 7et up verification! Cperator training
:etection! Functional test
! Jisual inspection
! &ouch for 'uality
! @auging
! Final test
: t ti
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
79/94
:etection
"robability the defect will be detected byprocess controls before next or subse'uentprocess% or before the part or componentleaves the manufacturing or assemblylocation
;i/ely hood the defect will escape themanufacturing location
Each control receives its own detectionran/ing% use the lowest rating for detection
Ri / " i it # b )R"#*
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
80/94
Ris/ "riority #umber )R"#*
R"# provides a method for a prioritizingprocess concerns
.igh R"#,s warrant corrective actions
:espite of R"#% special considerationshould be given when severity is high
especially in regards to safety
R"# f i /
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
81/94
R"# as a measure of ris/
An R"# is li/e a medical diagnostic%predicting the health of the patient
At times a persons temperature% blood
pressure% or an EV@ can indicate potentialconcerns which could have severe impacts
or implications
R d d ti
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
82/94
Recommended actions
Control
n$luence
Can-t control or in$luence at t#is time
Recommended Action
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
83/94
Recommended Action
:efinition tas/s recommended for thepurpose of reducing any or all of theran/ings
Examples of Recommended actions!"erform "rocess instructions )"*
&raining )"*
-an,t assemble at next station ):* Jisual +nspection ):*
&or'ue Audit ):*
P"EA as a n$o 0u*
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
84/94
Process %"EA document
Process
Control
Plan
Operator
,o*
nstructions
Process
%lo+
Diagram
Process
C#anges
Current or
E.pected
'ualit)
per$ormance
Customer
Design
re'uirements
mplementation
and veri$ication
Recommended
Corrective actions
i/e/
Error proo$ing
Continuous mprovement E$$orts
And RPN reduction loop
Communication o$ standard
o$ +ork to operators
FMEA process flow
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
85/94
"rocess FMEA exercise
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
86/94
"rocess FMEA exercise
&as/ "roduce and mail sets of contributionre'uests for 8reast -ancer research
Cutcome "rofessional loo/ing re'uests to
support research for a cure% 23 sets ofinformation% contribution re'uest% and
return envelope
Re'uirements
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
87/94
Re'uirements
#o inHury to operators or users Finished dimension fits into envelope All items present )info sheet% contribution form% and return envelope*
WVEPX All pages in proper order )info sheet% contribution form% return
envelope* WVEPX
#o tattered edges #o dog eared sheets +tems put together in order )info sheet Yfolded to fit in legal envelopeZ%
contribution sheet% return envelope* WVEPX @eneral overall neat and professional appearance
"roper first class postage on envelopes 8reast cancer seal on every envelope sealing the envelope on the bac/ Mailing label% stamp and seal on placed s'uarely on envelope WVEPX Rubber band sets of =2
"rocess steps
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
88/94
Fold information sheet to fit in legalenvelope
-ollate so each group includes all
components 7tuff envelopes
Affix address% postage% and seal
Rubber bands sets of =2 :eliver to post office for mail today by 2
pm
03 steps to conduct a FMEA
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
89/94
03 steps to conduct a FMEA
05 Review the design or process=5 8rainstorm potential failure modes
B5 ;ist potential failure effects
L5 Assign 7everity ratings
25 Assign Cccurrence ratings45 Assign detection rating
>5 -alculate R"#
?5 :evelop an action plan to address high R"#,s
15 &a/e action035 Reevaluate the R"# after the actions are completed
Reasons FMEA,s fail
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
90/94
Reasons FMEA s fail
05 Cne person is assigned to complete the FMEA5=5 #ot customizing the rating scales with company specific
data% so they are meaningful to your company
B5 &he design or process expert is not included in theFMEA or is allowed to dominate the FMEA team
L5 Members of the FMEA team are not trained in the use ofFMEA% and become frustrated with the process
25 FMEA team becomes bogged down with minute detailsof design or process% losing sight of the overall obHective
Reasons FMEA,s fail
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
91/94
Reasons FMEA s fail
45 Rushing through identifying the failure modes tomove onto the next step of the FMEA
>5 ;isting the same potential effect for every failure
i5e5 customer dissatisfied5
?5 7topping the FMEA process when the R"#,s are
calculated and not continuing with the
recommended actions5
15 #ot reevaluating the high R"#,s after thecorrective actions have been completed5
7oftware Recommendations
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
92/94
7oftware Recommendations
#umerous types and specialized formats Many have free trials
!K
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
93/94
-
8/13/2019 Unit-2 - FMEA
94/94
PotpourriPotpourriMethodsMethods RankingsRankingsSODSOD
$200
$300
$400
$500
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$100