uniform doping of metal oxide nanowires using solid state...
TRANSCRIPT
S1
Supporting Information for
Uniform doping of metal oxide nanowires using solid state diffusion Joaquin Resasco1, Neil P. Dasgupta2,3, Josep Roque Rosell4, Jinghua Guo4, and Peidong Yang2,5*
1Department of Chemical Engineering and 2Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States. Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 5Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Table S1. EXAFS Curve Fitting Parameters Path R(Å) N σ2(Å2) ΔE0(eV) S0 Rf (%) Mn-O 2.03 4 .00386 2.6576 0.8607
1.6
Mn-O 2.15 2 .00428 Mn-Ti 3.30 4 .0104 Mn-Ti 3.79 4 .0127 The coordination number N was taken to be fixed for the crystalline material. S0 and ΔE0 were fit to the same value for all paths as they are properties of the central atom. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Sample Source Δ2p1/2 (eV) Δ3s (eV)
MnO This work Ref S1 Ref S2
6.0 6.0 5.4
6.1 6.0 6.1
Mn2O3 This work Ref S1 Ref S2
10.1 10.0 10.5
5.2 5.1 5.4
MnO2 This work Ref S1 Ref S2
12.0 11.8 11.9
4.7 4.5 4.5
As deposited 10.75 5.3 Annealed 6.2 6.0
Figure Sdiisopropreflects th
Figure S2of numbecycle of Mwas obse
1: XPS survpylacetamidihe thermal s
2: (A) Thicker of cyclesMnOx ALD
erved after 1
vey spectra inate) followstability of th
kness of MnOs. A linear g
films under.0 s.
of MnOx ALwing a 60 she amidinate
Ox ALD filmgrowth rate or increasing p
S2
LD films deec Ar sputt
e precursor.
ms measuredof ~1.0 Å/cpulse time o
eposited usinter. The lack
d by TEM anycle was ob
of the Mn am
ng the Mangk of carbon
nd ellipsomebserved. (B) midinate prec
ganese bis(Nin the spec
etry as a funGrowth rat
cursor. Satur
N,N’-ctrum
nction te per ration
Figure Sconformascan of cwire and
Figure S4unchange
3: (A) TEMal coating. Score-shell nathe Ti in the
4: XPS speced before an
M image of Scale bar is 2anowire aftere core. Scale
ctra of the Tnd after the c
a core-shell20 nm. (B,C)r 200 cycles
e bar is 100 n
Ti 2p region,onversion pr
S3
l TiO2|MnO) STEM mos showing conm.
, showing throcess.
x nanowire de EDS maponfinement
he binding e
after 100 cypping and coof the Mn t
energy and p
ycles, showorrespondingo the shell o
peak structur
wing a
g line of the
re are
Figure Sdiameter dopant. C
Figure S6
5: EDS line(A) and len
Correspondin
6: (A,B) STE
e scans of Mngth (B) of ng elemental
EM mode el
Mn:TiO2 nanothe wire, inl maps are sh
lemental map
S4
owires showndicating thehown in Figu
ps of Ti and
wing the Mne homogeneogure 1f and 1
Zr in conve
n:Ti intensityous incorpog.
erted wire.
y ratio acrosration of the
ss the e Mn
Calculat
Figure S7of ALD f
tion of Expe
7: Measuredfilm thickne
ected Mn Co
d and calculass.
oncentratio
ated atomic c
S5
n
concentratio
on of Mn in cconverted wwires as a fun
nction
Ternary
Figure StemperatuMnTiO3.
Figure S9form axiarates of M
y MnTiO3 Ph
S8: X-Ray ures. The te
9: (A,B) TEMal segments Mn2+ along c
hase Forma
Diffraction ernary phase
M images ofof pure MnT
c-axis. EDS
ation
patterns foe MnTiO3 is
f nanowires TiO3 and TiOconfirms rel
S6
or convertedformed at
converted atO2. Axial seglative stoichi
d wire sam1050°C. * i
t 1050°C. Ngmentation iiometry of M
mples at difindicates dif
anowires phis likely due Mn and Ti in
fferent anneffraction line
hase segregatto high diffu
n segments.
ealing es for
te to fusion
Figure Sbetween respectivwhich caedge disl
10: (A,B) HRMnTiO3 and
vely. (F) Moian form due tlocations are
RTEM imagd TiO2. (C-Eiré image shto the simila
e observed at
ges of nanowE) FFTs of Ti
ows epitaxiaarity of the ot the interfac
S7
wires convertiO2 section, al interface bxygen subla
ce.
ted at 1050°MnTiO3 sec
between Mnattice in the t
C, showing ction, and intnTiO3 110antwo structure
the interfaceterface nd TiO2 001es. However
e
1
r,
S8
Transient Diffusion of Mn in TiO2 Nanowires The transient diffusion of Mn in the TiO2 nanowire can be described by Fick’s Second Law:
Where �� is the concentration of Mn and x is the distance from the edge of the nanowire. The solution for diffusion into a finite medium solution can be obtained numerically and is available in for simple geometric shapes in Gurney-Lurie charts. The numerical solution would predict a more rapid conversion than the solution for a semi-infinite medium but otherwise similar diffusion profiles. Therefore as a simple approximation, the nanowire can be considered a semi-infinite medium to yield an analytical solution:
erf2
The surface concentration of Mn (��� can be taken as unity as the nanowire shell is manganese oxide. The initial concentration of Mn in the nanowire (�� ) is zero. From single crystal studies the diffusion coefficients of various transition metals in rutile TiO2 at different partial pressures of oxygen are known.3 The diffusion coefficients of interest here are those orthogonal to the c-axis, which are lower than those parallel to the c-axis. The diffusion coefficients were also measured to be substantially higher at low partial pressures of oxygen. The diffusion coefficient of Mn in TiO2
is quite high: 1.1*10-10 cm2/s at 900°C in air. As the diffusion distance is quite small as the nanowire diameter is ~100 nm, the nanowires readily become fully converted at high temperature.
To observe the transient diffusion behavior the conversion process was investigated at lower temperatures. The expected distribution of Mn for the semi-infinite medium solution at T=600°C is shown in Figure S11, assuming a diffusion coefficient of 2.7*10-12 cm2/s for Mn diffusion orthogonal to the c-axis in an Ar environment. STEM elemental maps for incomplete conversion for different conversion times are shown in Figure S12. We see that at elevated temperatures the conversion is very rapid, and that the expected diffusion profiles are reproduced by the experimental data.
Figure Sin an Ar becomes
Figure S0, 1, 10,
11: Mn distrenvironmenfully conver
12: (A-D) STand 100 min
ributions in tt. The nanowrted in a rela
TEM mode En of conversi
the TiO2 nanwire is assumatively short
EDS elemenion at 600°C
S9
nowire as a fumed to be a s
conversion
ntal maps forC in Ar.
function of tisemi-infinitetime.
r transient co
ime for conve medium. T
onversion of
version at 60The nanowire
f nanowire a
00°C e
after
Mechani From sinsuggestedalong opeTi ions. DcrystalloginterstitiaHoweverthe c-axidriven byThe largechanges ipartial prdefect coFigure S
Figure Sin the 2p oxidation
ism for Diff
ngle crystal sd to be depeen channels Divalent iongraphic direcally. Both mr, in this systs. Thereforey Mn atoms er diffusion cin point deferessure of oxoncentration 13, however
13: (A,B) XPregion and t
n state.
fusion Proce
studies on mendent on theparallel to ths therefore hctions. Trivaechanisms atem, the con it is likely tdissolving scoefficients ect concentraxygen. In airand Mn is n
r, the mechan
PS spectra othe 3s multip
ess
etal ion diffue charge stathe c-axis andhave a large alent and tetrare importantncentration grthat the diffuubstitutionalobserved foations, name, the diffusio
not reduced tnism for diff
of the Mn 2pplet peak spl
S10
usion in rutile of the ion. d are pushedanisotropy iravalent ionst for mixed-vradient exist
usion of Mn lly and diffur conversion
ely oxygen von coefficiento the Mn2+ ofusion is like
and 3s regiolitting. The v
le TiO2, the Divalent im
d into substitin diffusion cs dissolve suvalent impurts in the radifrom the she
using throughn in an Ar envacancies andnts are reducoxidation staely unchange
ons, indicativalues are co
mechanism mpurity ions tutional Ti sicoefficient fubstitutionallrity ions sucial direction,ell into the wh an interstitnvironment ad interstitial
ced due to thate as showned.
ing the satellonsistent wit
of diffusiondiffuse rapidites by inters
for different ly and diffus
ch as Mn. , orthogonal
wire core is tial mechaniare a result o Ti atoms, w
he smaller pon in XPS in
lite peak distth a Mn3+
n is dly stitial
se
to
ism.3 of with oint
tance
S11
References: S1. Gorlin, Y.; Jaramillo, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13612.
S2. Dicastro, V.; Polzonetti, G. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1989, 48, 117.
S3. Sasaki, J.; Peterson, N.; Hoshino, K. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1985, 46, 1267.