understanding the draft common core state standards

27
Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards April 2010 Based on the March 10 th 2010 draft CCSS

Upload: hop

Post on 20-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards. April 2010 Based on the March 10 th 2010 draft CCSS. The Common Core State Standards Initiative. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

April 2010Based on the March 10th 2010 draft CCSS

Page 2: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

The Common Core State Standards Initiative

2

Beginning in the spring of 2009, Governors and state commissioners of education from 48 states, 2 territories and the District of Columbia committed to developing a common core of state K-12 English-language arts (ELA)

and mathematics standards.

The Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) is a state-led effort coordinated by the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and

the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). www.corestandards.org

Page 3: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

Why Common Core State Standards?

3

Preparation: The standards will be college- and career-ready. They will help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in education and training after high school.

Competition: The standards will be internationally benchmarked. Common standards will ensure our students are globally competitive.

Equity: Expectations will be consistent for all--and not dependent on a student’s zip code.

Clarity: The standards will be focused, coherent, and clear. Clearer standards will help students (and parents and teachers) understand what is expected of them.

Collaboration: The standards create a foundation to work collaboratively across states and districts, pooling resources and expertise, to create curricular tools, professional development, common assessments and other materials.

Page 4: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

Process and Timeline

4

K-12 Common Standards:

Core writing teams in English Language Arts and Mathematics (See www.corestandards.org for list of team members)

External and state feedback teams provided on-going feedback to writing teams throughout the process

Draft K-12 standards released for public comment on March 10, 2010; 9,600 comments received

Validation Committee of leading experts reviews standards

Final standards released May 2010

Page 5: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

Feedback and Review

5

External and State Feedback teams included:

K-12 teachers

Postsecondary faculty

State curriculum and assessments experts

Researchers

National organizations (including, but not limited, to):

American Council on Education (ACE) American Federation of Teachers (AFT) Campaign for High School Equity

(CHSE) Conference Board of the Mathematical

Sciences (CBMS) Modern Language Association (MLA)

National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE)

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM)

National Education Association (NEA)

Page 6: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

Common Core State Standards Design

6 *Ready for first-year credit-bearing, postsecondary coursework in mathematics and English without the need for remediation.

Building on the strength of current state standards, the CCSS are designed to be:

Focused, coherent, clear and rigorous

Internationally benchmarked

Anchored in college and career readiness*

Evidence and research based

Page 7: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

Common Core State Standards Evidence Base

7

Evidence was used to guide critical decisions in the following areas:

Inclusion of particular content

Timing of when content should be introduced and the progression of that content

Ensuring focus and coherence

Organizing and formatting the standards

Determining emphasis on particular topics in standards

Evidence includes:

Standards from high-performing countries, leading states, and nationally-regarded frameworks

Research on adolescent literacy, text complexity, mathematics instruction, quantitative literacy

Lists of works consulted and research base included in draft standards

Page 8: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

Common Core State Standards Evidence Base

8

For example: Standards from individual high-performing countries and provinces were used to inform content, structure, and language. Writing teams looked for examples of rigor, coherence, and progression.

Mathematics

1.Belgium2.Canada (Alberta)3.China4.Chinese Taipei5.England6.Finland7.Hong Kong8.India9.Ireland10.Japan11.Korea12.Singapore

English language arts

1.Australia• New South Wales• Victoria

2.Canada• Alberta• British Columbia• Ontario

3.England4.Finland5.Hong Kong6.Ireland7.Singapore

Page 9: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

Draft Common Core State Standards for

Mathematics

Page 10: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

10

Grade-Level Standards K-8 grade-by-grade standards organized by domain 9-12 high school standards organized by conceptual categories Include both concepts (what students need to understand) and skills (what

students need to know and be able to do)

Standards for Mathematical Practice Describe mathematical “habits of mind” Standards for mathematical proficiency: reasoning, problem solving,

modeling, decision making, and engagement

Draft Common Core State Standards for Mathematics

Page 11: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

11

The K- 8 standards:

The K-5 standards provide students with a solid foundation in whole numbers, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, fractions and decimals

The K-5 standards prepare students to be able to apply more demanding math concepts and procedures

The 6-8 standards allow for more robust learning in geometry, algebra, and probability and statistics

Modeled after the focus of standards from high-performing nations, the standards for grades 7 and 8 include significant algebra and geometry content

Students who have completed 7th grade and mastered the content and skills will be prepared for algebra, in 8th grade or after

Overview of K-8 Mathematics Standards

Page 12: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

12

Overview of K-8 Mathematics Standards

Each grade includes an overview of cross-cutting themes and critical areas of study

Page 13: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

13

Format of K-8 Mathematics Standards

Domains: overarching ideas that connect topics across the grades

Clusters: illustrate progression of increasing complexity from grade to grade

Standards: define what students should know and be able to do at each grade level

Clusters

Standards

GradeLevel

Domain

Standards for

algebraic thinking

Page 14: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

14

Format of K-8 Mathematics Standards

Domains

Clusters

K-5 Example of Domains and Clusters

Page 15: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

15

Overview of High School Mathematics Standards

The high school mathematics standards:

Call on students to practice applying mathematical ways of thinking to real world issues and challenges

Require students to develop a depth of understanding and ability to apply mathematics to novel situations, as college students and employees regularly are called to do

Emphasize mathematical modeling, the use of mathematics and statistics to analyze empirical situations, understand them better, and improve decisions

Page 16: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

16

Format of High School Mathematics Standards

Content categories: overarching ideas that describe strands of content in high school

Domains: groups of standards that describe coherent aspects of the content category

Standards: define what students should know and be able to do at each grade level

High school standards are organized around five conceptual categories: Number and Quantity, Algebra, Functions, Geometry, and Statistics and Probability

Modeling standards are distributed under the five major headings and are indicated with a () symbol.

Standards indicated as (STEM) are beyond the college and career readiness level but are necessary for STEM careers.

Page 17: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

17

Model Course Pathways for Mathematics

Model Mathematics Pathways:

Developed by a panel of experts convened by Achieve, including many of the standards writers and reviewers

Organize the content of the standards into coherent and rigorous courses

Illustrate possible approaches—models, not mandates or prescriptions for curriculum or pedagogy

Require completion of the Core in three years, allowing for specialization in the fourth year

Prepare students for a menu of courses in higher-level mathematics

Page 18: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

18

Model Course Pathways for Mathematics

Pathway ATypical in U.S.

Course 2

Course 1

Course 3a

Course 3bOR

Courses in higher level mathematics: Precalculus*, Calculus, Advanced Statistics, Discrete Mathematics, Advanced Quantitative Reasoning, or courses designed for career technical

pathways. *Students interested in Precalculus or Calculus should take 3a in either pathway

Pathway BIntegrated approach typical outside of U.S.

.

Course 2

Course 1

Course 3a

Course 3bOR

Page 19: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

Draft Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and

Literacy in History/Social Studies & Science

Page 20: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

20

Draft Common Core State Standards forEnglish Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies and Science

College and Career Readiness (CCR) Standards 10 overarching standards for each strand that are further defined by grade-

specific standards

Grade-Level Standards in English Language Arts K-8, grade-by-grade 9-10 and 11-12 grade bands for high school Four strands: Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, and Language

Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies and Science Standards are embedded at grades K-5 Content-specific standards are provided for grades 6-8, 9-10, and 11-12

Page 21: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

21

Overview of Reading Strand

Reading

Standards for Reading Foundations (K-3)

Reading Standards for Literature (K-12)

Reading Standards for Informational Text (K-12)

Progressive development of reading comprehension; students gain more from what they read

Emphasize the importance of grade-level texts that are of appropriate difficulty and are increasingly sophisticated

Page 22: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

22

Overview of Text Complexity

Reading

Reading Standards include over 200 exemplar texts (stories and literature, poetry, and informational texts) that illustrate appropriate level of complexity by grade

Text complexity is defined by:

Qua

litat

ive

1. Qualitative measures—levels of meaning, structure, language conventionality and knowledge demands Q

uantitative

2. Quantitative measures—word frequency, sentence length, and text cohesion

Reader and Task

3. Reader and Task—background knowledge of reader, academic task under consideration, teacher professional judgment

Page 23: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

23

Example of Grade-Level Progression in Reading

CCR Standard 3: Analyze in detail where, when, why, and how events, ideas, and characters develop and interact over the course of a text

Reading Standards for Literature Reading Standards for Informational Text

Grade 4: Describe in detail a character, event, or setting, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., from a character’s thoughts, words, deeds, or interactions with others)

Grade 4: Describe the sequence of events in an historical or scientific account, including what happened and why, based on specific information in a text

Grade 8: Analyze how elements of a story or drama interact (e.g. how plot and setting are integral to one another; how the setting affects characters).

Grade 8: Analyze how an author introduces, illustrates, and elaborates two or more significant ideas in a text, including how the relationship between ideas is expressed.

Grades 11-12: Analyze the impact of the author’s choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama (e.g., where a story is set, how the action is ordered, how the characters are introduced and developed.)

Grades 11-12: Analyze in detail an author’s ideas by describing how the ideas are developed and refined by specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions of a text.

Page 24: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

24

Overview of Writing Strand

Writing

Expect students to compose arguments and opinions, informative/explanatory pieces, and narrative texts

Focus on the use of reason and evidence to substantiate an argument or claim

Emphasize ability to conduct research—short projects and sustained inquiry

Require students to incorporate technology as they create, refine, and collaborate on writing

Include student writing samples that illustrate the criteria required to meet the standards (See Appendix C)

Page 25: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

25

Overview of Speaking and Listening and Language Strands

Speaking and Listening

Focus on speaking and listening in a range of settings, both formal and informal—academic, small-group, whole-class discussions

Emphasize effective communication practices

Require interpretation and analysis of message as presented through oral, visual, or multimodal formats

Language

Include conventions for writing and speaking

Highlight the importance of vocabulary acquisition through a mix of conversation, direct instruction, and reading

To be addressed in context of reading, writing, speaking and listening

Media and Technology are integrated throughout the standards.

Page 26: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

26

Overview of Standards for History/Social Studies and Science

Reading Standards for History/Social Studies and Science

Knowledge of domain-specific vocabulary

Analyze, evaluate, and differentiate primary and secondary sources

Synthesize quantitative and technical information, including facts presented in maps, timelines, flowcharts, or diagrams

Writing Standards for History/Social Studies and Science

Write arguments on discipline-specific content and informative/explanatory texts

Use of data, evidence, and reason to support arguments and claims

Use of domain-specific vocabulary

Page 27: Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

Understanding the Draft Common Core State Standards

April 2010Based on the March 10th 2010 draft CCSS