understanding char and terra preta soil · pdf fileunderstanding char and terra preta . soil...
TRANSCRIPT
UNDERSTANDING CHAR AND TERRA PRETA SOIL CHEMISTRY FROM PYROLYSIS MASS
SPECTROMETRIC ANALYSIS
K. Magrini, S. Czernik, R. Evans
October 6, 2008
OUTLINE
Rapid SOC AnalysisPy-MBMS Instrument and MethodsMultivariate Analysis
ResultsCharacterized and Managed SoilsTerra Preta Soils
Conclusions
MOLECULAR BEAM MASS SPECTROMETRY
• Combustion mode provides
C, N, and S concentrations
• Pyrolysis mode provides
SOC chemistry
• Handles large number of samples (100-300 samples/day)
• Analysis time is short (2-5 minutes)
Transportable MBMS
150-mg Soil Samples
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Time, Min.
Tota
l Ion
Inte
nsity
, Arb
itrar
y U
nits
#1719855-15 cm1.22% C #24
198515-30 cm1.59% C
#2319855-15 cm1.65% C
#2219850-5 cm4.16% C
#21198515-30 cm0.79% C
#2019855-15 cm1.52% C
#1919850-5 cm5.46% C
#18198515-30 cm0.94% C
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Time, Min.
Tota
l Ion
Inte
nsity
, Arb
itrar
y U
nits
#1719855-15 cm1.22% C #24
198515-30 cm1.59% C
#2319855-15 cm1.65% C
#2219850-5 cm4.16% C
#21198515-30 cm0.79% C
#2019855-15 cm1.52% C
#1919850-5 cm5.46% C
#18198515-30 cm0.94% C
py-Reactor
Pyrolysis MS Traces
Heated Quartz Reactore-
Argon Collision Gas
Collisions(P+) (D+)
DetectorQ1 Q2 Q3Soil
Samples
Heated Quartz Reactore-
Argon Collision Gas
Collisions(P+) (D+)
DetectorQ1 Q2 Q3Soil
Samples
CID provides a mass spectrum of a specific fragment ion for unique identificationi.e. Mass 396 is fragmented to identify ergosterol as the parent species
• Correlate with other spectroscopic techniques MIR, NIR, DRIFTS• Correlate with other characterization data• Build comprehensive SOC database for research use
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Time, Min.
Tota
l Ion
Inte
nsity
, Arb
itrar
y U
nits
#1719855-15 cm1.22% C #24
198515-30 cm1.59% C
#2319855-15 cm1.65% C
#2219850-5 cm4.16% C
#21198515-30 cm0.79% C
#2019855-15 cm1.52% C
#1919850-5 cm5.46% C
#18198515-30 cm0.94% C
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Time, Min.
Tota
l Ion
Inte
nsity
, Arb
itrar
y U
nits
#1719855-15 cm1.22% C #24
198515-30 cm1.59% C
#2319855-15 cm1.65% C
#2219850-5 cm4.16% C
#21198515-30 cm0.79% C
#2019855-15 cm1.52% C
#1919850-5 cm5.46% C
#18198515-30 cm0.94% C
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
20 70 120 170 220 270 320 370 420m/z
Ion
Inte
nsity
43,44
2728
5557 94 109
256135
8068
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND PLS MODELING
A projection method that helps to visualize information
• PCA helps to determine which samples are different and which variables are contributing
• to the difference
• Helps to determine groupings
• Helps quantify the amount of useful information
• PLS builds predictive models with quantitative information
Py-MBMS SOC ANALYSIS
• Analytical pyrolysis coupled with molecular beam mass spectrometry (py-MBMS) and multivariate statistics for rapid soil organic carbon (SOC) chemistry analysis of varied, characterized soils to establish breadth of application
RESULTS• Forest soils: distinguish disturbance,depth and location• Agro forest: SOC accumulation with poplar rotation (litter
and root inputs with depth)• Grassland CRP soils: distinguish management impacts• Native prairie soils: quantitating SMBC, SOC, POM C, Cmin,
fractions• Agricultural management for SOC accumulation (switchgrass)• Terra preta chemistry
Soil characterization data
PARAMETER RANGE
Depth (cm) 0-225
SOC (wt %) 0.02-9.8
SMBC (µg/g soil) 3.6-4933
POM C (g/g soil) 0.01-7.73
Cmin C (g/g soil) 0.61-1.16
Calendar Age (YBP) 0-16157 yrs
Native prairie soils: quantitating SMBC, SOC, POM C, C min
SOC PLS 1 modelfor all samples
• Lacustrine soils different
• Complex SOC spectra containing lignin, fatty acidsergosterol, and carbohydrate species
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Measured Y
Pred
icte
d Y
Measured YPredicted Y
Lacustrinesoils
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
25 125 225 325 425
m/z
regr
essi
on C
oeffi
cien
ts
368340
374
420
438
392396
254
270 312296
115117
105
919663
585960
7379 137
150164168 211
130144
7780
170172
125 Fatty acids
Lignin andcarbohydrates
SOC model regression coefficients
ESTIMATING SOC
Magrini et al., 2007.
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Measured Y
Pred
icte
d Y
MeasuredPredicted
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
25 125 225 325 425
X Variables
Reg
ress
ion
Coe
ffici
ents
394
282
96
111
81
60
107
256137138
121
84
6853
9173
213227
185
199
157
Palmitic acid: 74, 87, 101, 115, 129, 143, 157, 171, 185, 199, 213, 227, 256SMBC biomarker
SMBC PLS 1 model for all samples
SMBC model regression coefficients
Magrini et al., 2007.
ESTIMATING SMBC
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50
Measured Y
Pred
icte
d Y
MeasuredPredicted
PLS1 model regressing SMBC vs. mass 256
Single mass has potential to be used as an SMBC biomarker
Magrini et al., 2007.
ESTIMATING SMBC FROM MASS 256
SUMMARY OF PLS MODELS CONSRUCTEDWITH SAMPLE CHARACTERIZATION DATA
Variable # of Samples Correlation # Principal Components
Slope RMSEP
% Carbon 90 0.96 6 0.92 0.37POM C 27 0.96 3 0.92 0.61C min 28 0.92 1 0.83 0.53SMBC 48 0.96 6 0.97 173
14C Calendar Age 20 0.91 2 0.83 2210
K. A. Magrini, R. F. Follett, J. Kimble, M. F. Davis, and E. Pruessner.2007. Soil Science.
Depth 0-225 cm
SOC 0.02-9.8 wt%
SMBC 3.6-4900 µg/g
POM C 0.01-7.7 µg/g
C min 0.6-1.2 g/g
Calendar Age 0-16000 yrs
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
-20 -10 0 10 20
2
22
2
22
2
23
33
3
3
3
331
1
1
1
1 1
11
1
44
4
4
4
4
4
4 4PC1
PC2 Scores
Native
NoTill
18-yrCRP
ContinuousTill
Increasing total soil carbon <1.5 wt%3.0 wt%
0-5 cm
IncreasingSOM
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
-20 -10 0 10 20
2
22
2
22
2
23
33
3
3
3
331
1
1
1
1 1
11
1
44
4
4
4
4
4
4 4PC1
PC2 Scores
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
-20 -10 0 10 20
2
22
2
22
2
23
33
3
3
3
331
1
1
1
1 1
11
1
44
4
4
4
4
4
4 4PC1
PC2 Scores
Native
NoTill
18-yrCRP
ContinuousTill
Increasing total soil carbon <1.5 wt%3.0 wt% Increasing total soil carbon <1.5 wt%3.0 wt%
0-5 cm
IncreasingSOM
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
2
2
2
2
2
2
22
3
3
3
3
3
31
1
1
1
11
4
44
4
4
PC1
PC2 Scores
Native
CRP
CT
NT
5-10 cm
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
2
2
2
2
2
2
22
3
3
3
3
3
31
1
1
1
11
4
44
4
4
PC1
PC2 Scores
Native
CRP
CT
NT
5-10 cm
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
2
2
2
2
2
22
2
3
3
3
3
31
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
PC1
PC2 Scores10-30 cm
CRP
Native
CT
NT
Samples from Idaho farm in CRP 18 years.
PCA shows land mayneed to be in CRP longer to recoverto native standard
SOC levels.
Can we determine sequestration
potentials of soil types and
management impacts?
CRP and CT soils likely influencedby specific crop roots at 5-10 cm
• NT and CT: corn (shorter roots)• CRP: switchgrass (longer roots)
AT 10-30 cm, CT and CRP soilshave (CT-short roots) and switchgrass (CRP-long roots) crops. Possibly seeing SOC inputs from each root type
CRP Impacts on SOC Kimble 2003
Model for SOC ESTIMATION IN CRP SOILS
-3.00E-04
-2.00E-04
-1.00E-04
0.00E+00
1.00E-04
2.00E-04
3.00E-04
4.00E-04
5.00E-04
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
X-Variables
Reg
ress
ion
Coe
ffici
ents 60
68
78
96
110
114115
128132
142144
156
104106
53
396382
368340278280284
256161163 175 189 225
151137121123125
11111397
99
838569
71
5557
168
Fatty Acid Fragments (-CH 2-) 14 amu units55-69-83-97-111-125
57-71-85-99-113
Fatty AcidsLinoleicLinolenicStearic
308326 354
73 126
82
Carbohydrates60, 73, 82, 114
94
92
Monoaromatics78, 92, 106
Phenolics94, 110
Plant-derived
Microbial Contributions?
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
X-expl: 56%,9%
HA
NH
WSWS HA
NHWS
HA
NH WSWS
HA
NH
WSWSHA
NH
WS
HA
NH
WS
WS
NHWS
HA
NH
WS
WS PC1
PC2Scores
Cropped
AKRON, CO SOIL FRACTIONS
Native
WS: whole soilHA: humic acidNH: non hydrolyzable
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
25 75 125 175 225 275 325 375 425 475
m/z
Ion
Inte
nsity
Akron, CO Whole Soil Complex spectrum Lignin and carbohydrates present
44 amuCO2
9194959698
555760
818284
110
124138
150164
184
210
264
110, 124, 138, 150 amu "Lignin"
Aromatics
Mass spectra of Akron, COwhole soil and non hydrolysablefraction
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
25 75 125 175 225 275 325 375 425 475
m/z
Ion
Inte
nsity
284
9798 Aromatics91-95
44
57
83
138
194196
110
256
124150 Fatty
acids
Masses at 71, 83, 91, 111, 122, 252, 262, 284: may indicate fatty acids likely derived from microbialbiomass during decomposition
Non-hydrolyzable soil fractionLess complex spectrumEnriched in aromatics
m/z 94
OH
CH3
OH
OMe
NH O
M/z 67
M/z 164
Py-MBMS SHOWS:
• Fractions have different chemistry
• Humic acid similar spectrum to whole soil; enriched mass 91
• Lignin fragments and microbial products present in whole soil, humic acid, and humin fractions
• Non acid hydrolyzable fraction contains fatty acids. Less complex spectra than the whole soil and other
fractions – similar to terra preta
Principal Component 1Scores Terra Preta
C. Steiner – TP samples
Principal Component 1 Loadings – Terra Preta
Principal Component 2Scores Terra Preta
Principal Component 2 Loadings – Terra Preta
Palmitic Acid
Microbial BiomassMarkers (n-acetyl glucosamine)
Terra Preta and Forest Soils
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
20 70 120 170 220 270 320 370 420
m/z
Ion
Inte
nsity
Forest Soil
TerraPreta
44 amu
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
25 75 125 175 225 275 325 375 425 475
m/z
Ion
Inte
nsity
284
9798 Aromatics91-95
44
57
83
138
194196
110
256
124150 Fatty
acids
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
110
91, 94-6
137
Terra preta
Non hydrolyzablefraction AK, CO
NH and TPspectra aresimilar to each other and to highlycharredbiomass
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
20 70 120 170 220 270 320 370 420
m/z
Ion
Inte
nsity
43,44
2728
5557 94 109
256135
8068
TERRA PRETA MASS SPECTRUM
Proteins
Fatty Acids
CONCLUSIONS• Py-MBS rapidly characterizes SOC species
• Data can be used to estimate SOC and SMB contents
• Terra Preta soils have less SOM complexity and aresimilar to non hydrolyzablesoil fractions
• Working on characterizing“black carbon”
PS + NPK
PS + 5% Char
Potting Soil (PS)
Figure 1: Corn plant roots 35 days post germination in potting soil (PS), PS and NPK addition, PS and 5% peanut char.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
NREL LDRD Program
USDA NRCS and ARS
USDA FOREST SERVICE
BOISE-CASCADE
CHRIS STEINER