unclassified ad number limitation changesnized that, whereas timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope...

26
UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGES TO: FROM: AUTHORITY THIS PAGE IS UNCLASSIFIED AD013061 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Distribution authorized to U.S. Gov't. agencies and their contractors; Administrative/Operational Use; JUN 1953. Other requests shall be referred to Office of Naval Research, One Liberty Center, 875 North Randolph Street, Arlington, Va 22203-1995. ONR per ltr, 29 Nov 1968

Upload: others

Post on 10-Feb-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

UNCLASSIFIED

AD NUMBER

LIMITATION CHANGESTO:

FROM:

AUTHORITY

THIS PAGE IS UNCLASSIFIED

AD013061

Approved for public release; distribution isunlimited.

Distribution authorized to U.S. Gov't. agenciesand their contractors;Administrative/Operational Use; JUN 1953. Otherrequests shall be referred to Office of NavalResearch, One Liberty Center, 875 NorthRandolph Street, Arlington, Va 22203-1995.

ONR per ltr, 29 Nov 1968

Page 2: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

01 1

'■**

I*1 i

*'

4%

'*

EAT Reproduced by

M! . ,)f«ices Technical Information Agency r JMENT SERVICE CENTER

KNOTT BUILBINt, DAYTON, 2, OHIO

\

$ n

i ! I

H

i ■ '4

• • ..^ii

> «. id •«*• M

I ■■**«'

i,. ,it ft

CLASSIFIED

Page 3: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

Page 4: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

i (Siilitmlüa ttnturmitii in Ihr Clüu of ü\"rui t'nrh

DKPARTMhNT Ot ( IV11. LNl.lM.l.RIM

TIMOSHENKO'S SHEAR COEFFICIENT

FOR FLEXURAL VIBRATIONS OF BEAMS

hy

R D MINDLIN and H 1)1 RI.MIiWK /

Office nt Naval Research Prnj<tt NROol SHS I

Contract Nonr-*66((W)

Technical Report No 10

CD !1 -MONR 2M>(09) ( I

June 19 V*

1 I*

JJ

Page 5: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

TP1POTWS 9HEAP KP* \k VIBiUTKliS OF

Introduction

rj r

; I

Ihe range of applicability of the rmp-d linens lot a 1 theory of flex-

ural vibrations of beams was extended to higher frequencies by Tlmoshenko

when he took into account the effect of transverse shear deformation. He

arrived at the free-vibration equations (l)#

m

governing the transverse deflection) y , and the slope» <f> , of the deflec-

tion curve when the shear is neglected. The coefficient n. is defined as

the ratio of the average shear stress on a section to the product of the

shear modulus and the angle of ahear at the neutral axis. This ratio de-

pends upon the distribution of shear stress on the section and, hence, -fc,

depends upon the <<hape of the section, as Tlmosnenko observed. However,

the distribution of shear stress on a section depends also on the mode of

motion of the beam. For example, for low modes of motion of a slender

beam, the shear stress has a maximum at the neutral axis, while, for very

high modes, th« shear stress has a minimum at the same place. Thus, j|,

depends both on the shape cf the section and the frequency of vibration.

Numbers in parenthesis refer to Bibliography at the end of the paper.

Ul

Page 6: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

r jf-H ■r I

» ' '

In the solution of Equations [1], the simplest interpretation of

A ia that it ia a constant. For a beam of given cross-sectional shape«

then, A. oan have the correct value for only one frequency. Tn the past,

several calculations of A have been wade, for various cross-sectional

shapes, on the basis of statical considerations, that is, at aero fre-

quency. These values are satisfactory for the low modes of notion of

slender beans, where, in fact, the influence of transverse shear deforma-

tion is small in comparison with its influence at high frequencies.

As the frequency is increased, a point is reached at which a dras-

tic change occurs in the spectrum. This is the frequency, u) , of the

first thickness-shear mode of a bean of infinite length, i.e., the lowest

frequency at which th> infinite beam can vibrate with no transverse de-

flection, the displacement being entirely parallel to the axis of the

bean.

The reason for the change in character of the frequency spectrum

is that, at the frequencies of the first thiclcness-shear mode and its

overtones, there is strong coupling between the flexural and thiclcness-

shear modes of motion. Examples of this phenomenon have been described

in detail tn previous papers (2, 3) for special esses of crystal plates

for which the equations of motion are the sar*e AS those for a Tinoshenko

beam.

It is desirable, then, that the thickness-shear frequency calculated

from Equations [1] should be the same as that calculated from the equations

to which [1] are an approximation, namely, the three-dimensional equations

of small vibrations of an elastic body. In this connection it must be recog-

nized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection

curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^ and the depth

of the beam may be interpreted a? the maximum axial displacement of a transverse

u -2-

Page 7: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

r section. Thus, ul' is calculated from [1] by setting j/ = 0 and ^

proportional to €#f(<.cit't) , following which a/ is set equal to the cor-

responding frequency calculated from the three-dimensional equations.

Since a/ depends upon \ , the result is a formula for 4. •

It has been shown U) that, for a rectangular section, this pro-

cedure leads to n.« try/2 & 0.822 . Comparison «ith experiments

(2, 3) shows that, when 4. is calculated in this manner, Tlmoshenko's

equations give good results for both low and high frequencler.

In the present paper, A. i<* calculated in the same manner for a

variety of cross-aectional shapes. To do this, it is necessary to solve

the three-dimensional equations of elasticity for the appropriate fre-

quency and equate it with the value of 0> obtained from Equations [1].

In the case of motion parallel to the axis of the bar, the three-dimen-

sional equations ax 1 boundary conditions reduce to equations governing

a familiar hydrodynamical problem for which many solutions are known.

The determination of n. 1» thus reduced to an Interpretation of these

solutions and some additional computations. Results are given for the

following sections: circle, ellipse, orthogonal parabolas and a variety

of ovalolds. The values of It computed for these sections all lie within

about lOJl of that for the rsctangular section.

fit

\

Thlt.knes8-ai*ar Hotlont TiatoabeqltQ Theory

If u is set equal to zero in Equations [1], the second of the

equations gives "b^föt = 0 , so that the first of [1] reduces to

%>m-° [2]

-3-

Page 8: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

r

i

whem c • (<£*/*) y it«»» tha velocity of shear waves in an infinite,

Isotropie, elastic medium, and f ■ (I/A ) , i.e., the radiue of gyra-

tion of the oross-seotion. Hence, the frequency of pure thlckness-shsar

vibration of a Timoahanko bean is

«•= c*'y> [3]

This la the frequency which is to be equated to the one calculated fron

the solution of the three-dimensional equations for each section.

IMflhrift-fr—1 Motion i Three-Dlmenalonal Theory

Let the nvutral axis of the beam he the z -axis of a rectangular

coordinate system and let u . v »nd ** ^e components of displacement in

the & , u and e directions, respectively. For pure thickness-shear

motion,

u s \r * 0

K]

Then the thre: -^ilmcnsional equations of motion (!>) reduce to

where «^= %*»/: and V'» "t*/^*1 * * /^jf * . The condition that the

traction vanish on the cylindrical surface of the b?am reduces to

l//3r7 -- 0 [6]

on the boundary, where n in the normal to the boundary.

The differential equation [5] and the boundary condition [6] are

the same as those governing the small oscillations of a fluid in a basin

-L- J

a-

Page 9: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

of uniform depth (6) and the small vibration« of a pas in a ripid cylin-

drical container (7). Solutions are available for a variety of boundaries.

Rectangle

In the case of a rectaninilar section, the frequency is independent

of the width. If the depth 1 s 2a , the frequency is (6)

CO « TTc/lA [7]

Equa" ing [7] and [)], and noting that rls cff3 » the shear constant, A. ,

is found to be jrX//Z , or, approximately, 0 8tt ■

Circle

For a circular section of railius a , the lowest antisymmetric mode

has a frequency (6)

at = I.B+I C/A rg-.

The radius of pyration of a circle about a diameter is a/t . Hence,

equating [8] and [?], £ r 0 $¥7

The elliptic section was treated Ly Jeffreys (8), who computed

frequencies for two values of the eccentiicity

where a and ^ are the semi-major and semi-minor axes, respectively.

-5- [

J

Page 10: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

1t ■

! Additional values wer« computed and are listed In the columns headed u>a/c

and cuh/c In Table I. The corresponding values of CO were then equated

to that In Equation [l] to obtain the values of A listed in Table I.

It is interesting to notice that the frequency ( / S8& c/« ) of

the first antisymmetric mode of a very narrow ellipse, about Its minor

axis, is greater than that {iSllc/m ) of a rectangle of depth equal to

the major diameter of the ellips*. »affrays observed that this is due to

the concentration of motion near the center of the ellipse. On the other

hand, the corresponding frequency for a vary wide ellipse appears to ap-

proach that of the rectangle. However, the corresponding values of -4-

are not the same because of the difference« in radii of gyration.

The hyirodynamic problem for a symmetric section bounded by a pair

of orthogonal parabolas was studied by Hidaka (9). Such a section has

the property a/h ■ 2 , where 0 and b are the semi-major and semi-minor

axes, respectively. Foi motion antisymmetric with respect to the minor

axis, Hidaka found a secular equation which can be reduced to

I l

where S(t) is the Bessel function of the "irst kind. The lowest root

of Equation [10] is (10)

fa/l = I-05SS [n]

so that

u> = l.m c/a [12]

-6- 1

Page 11: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

[~r~ ++%0Stt*- n ■ i

Equating [12] and [3] and noting that r1« a*/s , the result la A « 0 S96

This completes the calculations for sections for which exact solu-

tions are available. The rrsuits are assembled in Table I and the sec-

tion are illustrated in Fig. 1.

-

Qvalolds

Approximate frequencies, good for narrow sections, may be obtainea

by neglecting the variation of displacement acrofls the width. Hidaka (9)

did this for sections oounded by *he curves

l/tm

[131

f

I

i - - - L

A set of '.hese curves, for the case a*Zb , is shown in Fig, 2.

Hitlaka's results for the lowest mode, antisymmetric about the hor-

i'^ntal axiJ of Kip. ?, are piven in Table II, alone with the correspond-

ing values of 4. . In finding 4. » the radius of gyration (r ), defined by

rL * a _

/y *

[U]

must te computed. Inserting y from Equation [13] into Equation [H], and

making the substitution i * a sin 6 n the inteprals? we find

r

a

J OS 0 J6

COS 0 dO 6 I

[15]

-7- * J

Page 12: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

4 I By aid of the formula (11)

r/t

f a****** „ H /r r(*&) 2 r(l+,)

n > -I

-f*--

and the recursion formula for the Genua, function, Equation [15] reduces to

r*. al/(3 ♦ tm) [16]

The . Jsuits in Table II are the same as in Table I for the rectangle

{ji ■ «e ) for any b/a since the assurapticn of uniform displacement across

the width is exact in pure thickness-shear notion. For the ellipse ( /t */ ),

Table II give« the same value as Table I only for b/* -O (i.e., e-/ ),

since here, too, there is no variation of displacement -».cross the width.

As the section becomes wider, there is some discrepancy, but it is not

great. Even for * -b (the circle), Table I gives 4L - 0.847, while the

approximation yields 0.889. Th'1 approxiration Is not intended, of course,

to apply to b 7 a . Another comparison may be made for the parabola with

o« tb . The value of $. In Table I is 0.896, while the approximation

gives 0.924. Thus it may le expected that the approximate solution of

Equation [5] will give results good to within a few percant for sections

at least twice as deep as they are wide.

,.JL~L.

1 -8- f

i

Page 13: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

?AB1Z I

■ Jeffreys "(8) ** Convergence clow

rt

i

4

1, it

-9-

%

c Motion antiayiuwetric

about minor axis Motion antisynnetric

about major a: is

A/A/C A C*t&/c 4

1.571 ,822 1.571 .822

j EIHruM

! e - IcO 1.886« .889 ••

e = 0.9 1.878 .882 #*

e = 0.8 1.87 • .87 1.78 * .79

e = 0.7 1.858 .863 1.814 .323

e = 0.6 1.856 .861 1.823 .831

e s 0.3 1.845 .851 1.837 • 8U

e = 0 (circle) 1.841 -8^7 1.841 .847

Orthogonal r>raboja3

i 2.L17 .896

Page 14: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

r ir « I

TABLE II

Ji *?': u/a/c r»/** —l

4

0 1 * 2.150 V5 .924

1 1/? •• 1.886 V4 .889

2 V4 1.717 2/7 .862

1 V8 1.655 V13 .&i3

/. V16 1.616 8/25 .836

5 1/32 1.591 16/49 .826

oo 0 •** 1.571 VI .822

parabolas; ** ellipse; *** reetanple.

-10-

Page 15: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

I 1 T—T

! h

(l) S. Timoahenko, "Vibration Problem« in Engineering," D. Van Noatrand

Company, Nev York, 2nd Edition, 1957, p. 338.

It is of some historical interest that both the rotatory iner-

tia correction, usually attributed to Rayleigh ("Theory of Sound,"

Cambridge, England, first edition, 1877V current edition, reference (7),

art. 162),and the transverse shear correction, usually attributed to

Tiaoshenko (FhllMoptai^l M»g-zine, Ser. 6, Vol. 41» 1921, pp. 744-746,

and Vol. 43, 1922, pp. 125-Hl),are given by M. Dresse in his "Cours

ie Mecanique Appllquee," "fcllet-Bachalier, Paris, 1859, p. 126.

(2) R. D. "indlin, "Thickness-Shear and Flexural Vibrations of Crystal

Plates," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 22, 1951» op. 316-323.

(3) R. D. MinriHn, "Forced Thickness-Shear and Flexural Vibrations of

Piezoelectric Crystal Plates," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 23, i<-52, pp. 83-88.

(4) R. D. Mindlin, "Influence of Rotatory Inertia and Shear on Flexural

Motions of Isotropie, Elastic Plates," J. Appl. Mach., Vol. 18, 1951,

pp. U-*8.

(5) S. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier, "Theory of Elasticity," McGraw-

Hill Book Co., New York, 2nd Edition, 1951, p. 452.

■ l 1 i

(6) H. Lamb, "Hydrodynamics," Dover Publications, New York, 6th Edition,

1945, pp. 282-290.

(7) Lorti Rayleigh, "Theory of Sound," Dover Publications, New York, 2nd

Edition, 1945, art. 339.

I_L

I ±.

.11-

; 1 :

Page 16: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

i ,

i

* (8) H. Jeffrey«, "The Free Oeoillaticna of Water in an Elliptic lake,"

Proo. Lordon Math. Soo., Ser. 2, Vol. 23, 1924, pp. 455-476.

(9) K. Hidaka, "The Oscillations of Water in Spindle-Siaped and Elliptic

Basins as wall as the Associated Problems," Mas. Imp. Marine Obeorr.,

Kobe, Japan, Vol. 4» 1931, pp. 99-219.

r *-

(10) "Tables of Besael Functions of Fractional Order," Columbia Unirersity

Press, New York, 1948, Vol. 1, p. 384.

(11) B. 0. Peiree, "A Short Table of Integrals," Ginn and Company, Boston,

3rd reTised edition, 1929, No. 483.

-12-

Page 17: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

V !

am ~ r-n-i i 4-j—*

i

I !

II

Fig. Is Elliptic and parabolic sections for which thiclcnesfl-shear frequency (a/) and Timoshenko's con- stant (•*€) are piven in Table I. DusheH line is para- bolic section. Thickness-shear motion is antisymmetric about axis A-A ■

\ i

LL_

Page 18: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

r 1—(T

-'ip. 2: Ovaloid sections for which approx- imate values of w and 4 are given In Table II,

_i L

[j I

Page 19: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

T — i

i i

DISTRIBUTION LIST

for

Technical and Final Reports Issued Under Office of hnl Rcjsarcb Project NR-064-J88. Contract Nonr-266(09)

DitoAcAüiUUiLi BaXmagJ and LliUac ABWEttn of AM Chief of NaT«! Research Department of the Nary Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Code 4*8

Director, Naval Research Lab, Waahirgton 25» D.C. Attn: Tech. Info. Officer

Technical Library Mechanics Division Code 1814 (J. P. Walsh)

Cosmanding Officer Office of Naval Research Branch Office 150 Causeway Street Boston 10, Massachusetts

Commanding Officer 'Office of Naval Research Branch Office H6 Broadway New York 1», New York

Commanding Officer Office of Naval Research Branch office 844 N. >ush Street Chicago 11, Illinois

(2)

(9) (1) (2) (1)

(1)

(1)

Commanding Officer Office of Naval Research Branch Office 1000 Geary Street San Francisco 24, Calif or., ia (1)

Commanding Officer Office of Navel Reset Branch Office 1010 Green Street Pasadena, California

rch

(1)

Contract Administrutor, SE Area Office of Naval Research c/o George Washington University 707 22nd Street, N.W. Washington 6, D.C. (1)

Jfficcr in Charge Office of Naval I .-search Branch Office, London Navy No. 100 FPO, New Tort, N.Y.

Library of Congress Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Navy Research Section

(5)

(2)

(1)

GENERAL

Department of Defense Other Interested Governy>Bt AcU^Uvr

ARMY

Research and Development board Depaitment of Defense Pentagon Building Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Library (Co-4^ 3D-1075) (1)

Chief of Staff Department of the Army Research and Development Division Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Chief of Res. and Dev. (1;

Armed Forces Special Weapons Project P.O. Box 2610 Washington, D.C. A*"i: Col. G. F Blunda (l)

i i

ji

Page 20: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

r 7

ARMY (cant.)

Office of the Ch'*f of Eagiaeers Assistant Chief for Works Department of the ..rayr Bldg. 7-7, Gravelly Point Washington 25, D.C. Atta: Structure! Branch

(R. L. Bloor) (1)

Office of the Chief of Engineers Asst. Chief for Military Construction Departaent of the Any Hldg. T-7, Gravelly Point Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Structures Branch

(H. F. Carey) (1)

Office of the Chief of Engineers Asst. Chief for Military Operations Departaent of the Army Bldg. T-7, Gravelly Point Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Structures DeTelopasnt Branch

(W. F. Woollard) (1)

Engineering Resoareh & DeTelopasnt Lab. Fort BslToir, Virginia Attn: Structures Branch (1)

The Coaaanding General Sandla Base, P.O. Box 5100 Albuquerque, New Mexico Attn: Col. Canterbury (1)

Operations Research Officer Departaent of the Artsy ft. Lesley J. McNair Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Howard Brackney (1)

Off! :t of Chief of Ordnance Research 4 DeTelopasnt Serrlce Departaent of the Ar»y The Pentagon Washington 25, D.C. Atta: ORDTB (2)

Cor aanding Officer Ballistic Research Laboratory Aberdeen ProTlng Ground Aberdeen, Maryland Altn: Dr. C. U. Laapsoo (1)

ARM! (oont.)

Coaaanding Officer Wetertown Arsenal Watertown, Massachusetts Attn: Laboratory Diviaion (1)

Coaaanding Officer Frankford Kr serial Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Attn: Laboratory DiTlsioo (1)

Coaaanding Officer Squier Signal Laboratory Fort Monaouth, lev Jersey Atta: Components and Materials

Branch (l)

MATT

Chief of Bureau of Ships HaTy Departaent Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Direct^»- of Research (2)

Director David Taylor Modal Basin Washington 7, D.C. Attn: -Structural Mechanics Div. (2)

Director Naval Engr. Experiment Station Annapolis, Maryland (1)

Director Materials Laboratory New York Naval Shipyard Brooklyn 1, New York (l)

Chief of Bureau of Ordnance Navy Departasnt Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Ad-), Technical Library (1)

Superintendent Naval Gun Factory Washington 25, D.C. (1)

Naval Ordnance Laboratory White Oak, Maryland RFD 1, Silver Spring, Maryland Attn: Mechanics Divisi« (2)

Naval Ordnance Test Station layokern, California Attn: Scientific Officer (1)

il

j

Page 21: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

ir

NAV? (cont. )

Naval Ordnance Test Station Underwater Ordnance Division Pasadena, California Attn: Structures Division

Physics DiTision

Chief of Bureau of Aeronautics Navy Department Washington 25, D.C. Attn: TD-^1, Technical Library

(1) (1)

(1)

AIR FORCES (cont.). Office of Air Research Wright-Patterson Air Force Bute Dayton, Ohio Attn: Chief, Applied Mechanics

Group (1)

OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES U.S. Ato-i^ Energy Coaemission DKdion of Research Washington, D.C. (1)

Naval Air Experimental Station Naval Air Materiel Center Naval Base Philadelphia 12, Pennsylvania Attn: H«ad, Aeronautical Materials

Laboratory (1)

Chief of Bureau of Yards * Dock* Navy Department Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Code P-1H (l)

Officer in Charge Naval Civil Engr. Researdc and E»*i.

Laboratory Nav>l Station Port Huenene, Califorria (1)

Superintendent, U.S. Naval Post Graduate School

Annapolis, Maryland (1)

Commander U.S. Naval Proving Grounds Dahlgren, Virginia (1)

AIR FORCES demanding General U.S. Air Forces The fentagon Washington 25, D.C. Attn: Research * Development

Division (I)

ArgoniM National Laboratory P.O. Box. 5207 Chicago 80, Illinois (1)

Director National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. Attn: Dr. W. H. Bamberg (1)

D.S. Coast Guard 1300 E Street, N.W. Washington, n,C. Attn: Chief, Testing & Development

Division (1)

Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin Attn i L. J. Markvardt (1)

National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics

1724 F Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. (l)

National Advisory Committee for Aerouautica

Langley Field, Virginia Attn: Dr. E. Lundqulst (1)

National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics

Cleveland Municipal Airport Cleveland, Ohio Attn: J. H. Collins, Jr. (1)

Commanding General Air Meterlel Command Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Hayton, Ohio Attn: vrjREX-B (E. H. Schwartz) (1)

U.S. taritime Commission Technical Bureau Washington, D.C. Attn: Mr. V. R-'sso (1)

Hi

J_j ;

Page 22: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

r „is

Contractors and Other Investigatory Actively Engaged In Related Raaearch

Professor J. R. Andersen Towne School of Engineering University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (1)

Dr. G. F. Carri ir Gr»duate division of Applied Mt thes» tic« Hrjwn 'niversity Provlience, Rhode Island (i)

rYofessor Lynn Oeedle Fritz Enplneerinp Laboratory Lehiph University r>thlehem, Pennsylvania (l)

Professoi C. o. oieseno Technische Hoopeschool Niewe lean 76 Delft, Holland (1)

Professor M. A. Diot 1819 Broadway New York, New York (1*

Professor h. L. BisplLn»?hoff Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dopt, of Aeronautical Engineering Cambridge V), l-lassachusetts (1)

Mrit. Hilda L. Cooper 150 Ravine „vanue Yonkera, New York

Dr. Antoine E. I. Craya Neyrplc Boite ioetale 5* '"iremohle, Frenc«

(1)

(1)

Professor J. I. Den Hartog M»anachusetts Inatituta of Technology Cambridge )9, Massachusetts (l)

Dr. Herbert Dareslewicz Dept. of Civil fcjiglneeri ig Colwbia university 6l2 *sn\. 125th 3tr«ot New York 27, :«sv York (!)

i.

Dr. Hans H. bleich Dept. of Civil /Engineering Colombia University New York 27, NOW York

Profes or J. A. Bogdanoff Jurlue University Lafayette, Indiir.a

Professor 3. a. boley Dept. of Civil Engineering Columbia University New York 27, New York

Professor t. A, uridjTemnri Dept. of Physics Harvard University Cambridge, MaseuchUSHUS

Professor D. M. ttirmister Dept. of Civil Engineering Columbia University New York 27, New York

(I)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1;

Dr. V. Cadambe Assistant Director of the National

Physical Laboratory of India New Delhi 12, India (l)

iv

Dr. 0. 0. Dohrenwend Renatialaer Polytechnic Inatitu*.« Troy, New York CL)

Professor T. J. Jol/m Dept. of Theoretical and Applied

Mechanic« University of 111i loi» Urban*, Illinois U)

Professor Lloyd Donnell Dept. -jf Mechanics Illinois Institute of Technology Technology Center Chicago 16, Illinois (1)

Professor D. C. Druck» r Brown Uiiiveraity Proviience, Rhode Island (1)

Dr. W, Eckert Watson Scientific fkMputing Laboratory 612 West 116th Strvat New York 27, Now York (1)

Dr. H. Ekateln Ardour Research Foundation Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago 16, Illinois (1)

j!

Page 23: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

1 -

Contract; -,<?r Invest Lmtora Actively Engaged In ftelatad Reaearch (coat.)

i

1

Engineering Library Columbia. University New Y<nk 27, Naw I«k

Professor F., L. Eriksen iiv, 4 •»■■»«... 4 ••<• ■»«■ »M-l.4—*_

Ann Arbor, Michigan

Professor k. C. Erlngen IlK-.oia Institute uf Technology Technology Center Chicago 16, Illinois

Dr. W. L. Esasijer Technische Hocgeachool Nlewe Laan 76 Delft, Holland

Profasaor A. M. Prouder, thai Dept. of Civil Engineering Columbia Uriversity Na». York 27, New fork

Professor 5. Frisd «««hi- i't x> State College Pullman, Washington

Irofessor K. 0. Friedrich» New York University Washington Square S*'w lorV , New York

Professor M. K. Froc'ftt Illinois Institute of Technology T?"J.nology Canter Chicago 16, Illinois

Professor J. M. Oirrelts Dapt. of Civil Engineering Columbia University New York 27, New York

Dean J. A. (ioff University of PenniyJvan1»

Mr. Martin Go.lano Midwest Fasearch Institute £049 Pernsylvania Avenue Kansas Oity 2, Missouri

.A . J. N. Coodier l>?pt. of MsehanJcfl Sr Stanford Unlve-nii.y Stanford, Califomia

5*ri ■

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(?)

(1)

>-./

(1)

(1)

Dr. L. E. Goodiaan Dapt. of Civil Engineering University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois (1)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sept. of Civil ft Sanitary Englne-rin* Cambridge J9, Massachusetts (1 >

Professor R. M. Henees University of »nta Clara Santa Clara, California

Prcfassor G. Herrmann Dapt. of Civil Engineering Columbia University New York 27, New York

iinfroaor M. Hetenyl Northwestern University The Technological Institute IVanstan. Illinois

(1)

(1)

(1)

rjo i 0 u*? w» Hipgi-ns Dept. of Electrical Engineering University of Wisconsin Madison 6, Wisconsin (1)

Dr. K. J. hoff, Head Dspt. of Aeronautical Engineering

& Applied Mechanics Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn >9 Livingston Street Brooklyn 2, New York (i)

irofessor M. 3. Hogan University of Utah .kit Lake City, Utah

Professor D. L. Holl Iowa State College Ames, Iowa

[IT. J. H. Hollon.on funeral Electric h«seaich Labs. '. River Road ichenectady, New York

Dr. w. H. rioppraanm Dept. of Applied Msrv*nica The Johns Ho^klrs University i*.it lmore , , / to xA

(1)

(1)

a)

(i)

SI

Page 24: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

r r

r4

Contractors and Other Investlgatorc Actively Engaged lr Related Research (cont. )

I 4 <

« < *' 1 I *

Institut de Mathematlquea Universite post. fal> 55 Skoplje, Yugoslavia (1)

Professor L. S. Jacobsen Dept. of Mechanical hngineerlng Stanford University Stanford, Califomlü 11)

Professor Sruce G. Johnston Jnlv"rsltj of Michit?an Ann Arbor, Michigan (1)

Prof«39or K. Klotter Stanford University Stanford, California (l)

Professor W, J. Krefeld Jept. of Civil ünflneering Columbia Unii'ersity New York 27, New York (1)

Professor B. J. Lauer. Dept. of Materials u.^inee ring University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota (1)

Jr. E. H. Lee Division of Applied Mathemtics Brown University irovidence, Rhode Island (1)

Professor George Lee Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Trey, New York (1)

Professor J. M. Leasells Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge *9, Massachusetts (1)

Library, Engineering i >nd>.tion 29 West 19th Street New York, I4*w York (1)

Professoi p l Lieber Oept. o<* Kjigi leering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York (1)

Or. H>m Lo Pordue University !afayefUt, Indiana U)

Professor C. T. G. Looney Dept. of Civil Engineering Yale University New Haven, Connecticut (1)

Dr. J. L. Lubkln Midwest Research Institute 4(U° Pennsylvania Avenue Kansas City 2, Missouri (1)

Professor J. F. Ludloff School of Aeronautics New York University New York 53, New York (1)

Professor J. N. Menduff Rensselaer Polytedmic Institute Troy, New York (1)

Professor C. W. MaoGrego" UVversity of Pennirylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (1)

Professor Lawrence E. Malvern Ospt. of Mathematics Carnegie Institute of Technology Pittsburgh l'<, Pennsylvania (1)

Dr. J. H. Merchant Brown University Providence, hhode Island (1)

Professor J. Marln Pennrylvania State College State College, Pennsylvania (1)

Jr. W. P. Mason Bell Telephone Laboratories Murray Hill , New Jersey (1)

Professor R. D. Mlndlin Dept. of Civil Engineering Columbia University 612 West 125th Street Ni.w York 27, New York (15)

;*-. A. Nadai 116 Cherry Valley Koad Pittsburgh 21, Pennsylvania (1)

R .fessor Paul M. Naghdl Dspt. of En Sneering Mechanics University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan Ü)

Page 25: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

r T if

i

; i

, ■

( 1

1

L

-■I ,L, \

Contractors and Other IflTectimto« Actively BBOaUd *° RaLated Research (cent.)

Professor N. M. Newmark Dapt. of Civil Engineering University of Illinois Urban«, 111 in MB

Professor Jess« Ormomlroyd University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan

Dr. W. Oagood Illinois Institute of Technology Technology Center Chicago 16, Illinois

(1)

(1)

Dr. George B. Pegraa Conaittee on Government Aided Research 313 Low Memorial Library Columbia University New York 27, New York

Or. R. P. Peteraen Director, Applied Physics Division Sandia Laboratory Albuquerque, New Mexico

Mr. R. E. Peterson Westlnghouse Research Laboratories East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Dr. A. Pnilllps School of Engineering Stanford University Stanford, California

Professor Gerald Pickett Dept. of Mechanics University of Wisconsin Madison 6, Wisconsin

Dr. H. Poritzky General Electric Research Labs. i'jhenectady, New York

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

Dr. W. Prager Graduate Division of Applied Mathematics Brown University Providence, Rhode Island (1)

RAND Corporation 1500 4th Street Santa Monica, California attnt Dr. D. L. Judd (1)

vli

Dr. S. Kaynor Armour F*search Foundation Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago 16, Illinois (i)

Professor E. Retssner Dept. of Ma the*« tics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge 39, Massachusetts (1)

Professor H. Reissner Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn 99 Livingston Street Brooklyn 2, New York (1)

Dr. Kenneth Rchinson National Bureau of Siandarda Washington, D.C. (1)

Professor M. A. Sadcwsky Illinois Institute of Technolog} Technology Center Chicago 16, Illinois (1)

Professor M. G. Salvador! Dept,, of Cl\'il engineering Colusjbia University New York 27, New York (1)

Dr. F. S. Shaw Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn 99 Livingston Street Brooklyn 2, New York (1)

Dr. Daniel T. Sigley Applied Physics Laboratory The Johns Hopkins University 0621 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland (1)

Dr. C. B. Sarith Department of Mathematics Walker Hall University of Florida Gainesville, Florida (1)

Professor C. R. Soderbezg Massachusetts Institut», of Technology Cambridge )9, Massachusetts 7*1)

Professor R. V. Southwell Imperial College of Science and

Technology South Kensington London S.W. /, England (1)

-a. i_

Page 26: UNCLASSIFIED AD NUMBER LIMITATION CHANGESnized that, whereas Timoshenko interpreted ^ as the slope of the deflection curve when the shear deformation in neglected, the product of ^

r i

-

- *«j.aBaF*'

I—T

her

Professor E. dternberg Illinois Institute of Technology Technology Center Chicago 16, Illinois

Professor J. J. Stoker New York Unlvers' ty Washington Square i >w lork, New York

Mr. K. A. Sykes Bell Telephone Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey

Professor P. S. Symonds Brown Jni*rereity Providence, Rhode Island

TO] Bill

(1)

(1)

(1)

Professor J. L. Syr^e Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies School of Theoretical Physics 64-65 Merrlon Square Dublin, Ireland

(1)

Professor F. K. Telchaann Dept. of Aeronautical Engineering New York University university Heights, Bronx New York, New York

Professor S. P. Tinoahenko School of engineering Stanford University Stanford, California

(1)

(11

(1) {*• r" A. Truesdell

Hloo«ington, Indiana

Professor Karl S. Van Dyke Department of Hiysics Scott Laboratory Wssleyea University Middletown, Connecticut

Dr. I. Vlgness Naval Research Lahor«t; Anacostia Station Washington, D.C.

Dr. Leonarde Villen» Gran Via J. Antonio 6 Madrid, Spain

(1)

— J

(1)

(1)

(1)

w. vlii

iQegtirch (fiaa^ Professor E. Volterra Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York (1)

Mr. A. M. Wahl Uestlnghouse Research Laboratories East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (1)

Professor C. T. Wang Dept. of Aeronautical haglneerirg New York University University Heights, Bronx New York, N-w York (1)

Dr. R. L. w>pel RFD 2 reeksklll, New York

(1)

(1)

Professor E. E. w»ibel University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado

Dr. Alexander »toinstein Institute of Applied Mathematics University of Maryland College Park, Maryland (1)

Professor Dana Young Dept. of Mechanical Engineering University of Minnesota Minneapolis L£, Minnesota (1)

i