unclass joint force 2020 as of 231400 aug 14 1 brandon cholek, ctr js j4 ocssd (757) 933-6010 ocs...
TRANSCRIPT
UNCLASS
Joint Force 2020
As of 231400 Aug 14
OCS Joint ConceptOMI Demonstration with USPACOM
26 August 2014 1
Working Draft
Brandon Cholek, CTRJS J4 OCSSD(757) 933-6010
OCS Mission Integrator (OMI) Demonstration
UNCLASS
Agenda
• Background• Joint Concepts
• Baseline Assessment Report (BAR) • Project Framework• OCS JC Solution Evolution
• Transition Implementation • OMI Demonstration
• CONOPS• Ideas for Measurements/metrics• OMI vs OCSIC
• Review Effects, Capabilities, Tasks spreadsheets• OMI• OMI Related
As of 231400 Aug 14 2
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 143
Purpose
Provide OCS Joint Concept background information leading to the development and approval of the
concept and subsequent implementation, including the OMI demonstration
If you are going to propose pursuing a new capability, plan on a fight. Think through who will be opposed and why, and formulate a good defense. Do not underestimate the ability of the bureaucracy to make a good idea so painful that even its originator is relieved to see it die. CBA User’s Guide
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 144
RESEARCH
WRITE
EVALUATE
TRANSITION
Joint concepts describe how the joint force is expected to conduct operational-level joint functions, activities and operations within a military campaign in the future
• Written to solve compelling real world challenges, current or envisioned• Directed by DoD, tasked by CJCS, or requested by the Combatant Commands or Services• Foundational documents that are intended to guide all dimensions of force development• Developed in concert with training, doctrine, and lessons learned to accelerate joint operational maturity
Validated DOTMLPF and Policy recommendations
current or future real-world challenge that is compelling…existing doctrinal approaches deemed nonexistent, incomplete or inadequate
Through formal experimentation, practical experience, analysis, & professional debate
leader-centric and idea-focusedReflects DoD vision
Joint Concepts
UNCLASS
Current and Future OCS Efforts
FY08-10 FY11 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18FY12
OCS ICD
OCS CONOPS/
CBAGaps POM’d &Satisfied
Reformation: 1-7 Year View
Ongoing efforts & OCS Action Plan Institutionalizes OCS
Transformation: 8-20 Year View
Experiment
Develop OCS JC
2020-2030JCIDS
Process
Joint Concept
for Logistics:Appendix H:
OCS
Initiate OCS JC
Proposal DCRs
OCS JC Operationalizes OCS for JF 2020 As of 231400 Aug 14
Transition
5
JF 2020
UNCLASS
Military Need Scope
OPR and JustificationCentral Idea/Approach
Joint Force 2020 needs OCS to be as responsive and reliable as military forces. The OCS challenge will be to enable the JFC to rapidly and seamlessly achieve joint operational effects while firmly affixing accountability of contracted resources.
Contracted support for military operations will be a fully interdependent capability of JF 2020. OCS will enable Total Force partners, including contractors, to rapidly integrate into JF 2020 operations, share resources, and to create capabilities. The interdependencies inherent in JF 2020 will require a cultural shift where joint commanders possess a greater understanding of the effects, responsiveness, management, and accountability associated with contracted support.
OPR: Joint Staff, J4, 571.256.1003Justification:• 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance• 2011 National Military Strategy• JROCM 148-11, 08 Nov 2011• 24 Jan 2011 SecDef OCS Memo• Capstone Concept for Joint Operations JF 2020• Joint Concept for Logistics• Lessons learned from OIF and OEF
Operational Contract Support Joint Concept
6
• Applicable to CCMDs, JTFs and CSA• Across the range of military operations
• All phases of operations• Spans all joint functions • 2020-2030 timeframe• DoD focused, initially
As of 231400 Aug 14
Many iterations……8 months
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14 7
OCS JC BAR, v0.1 – v0.3
• Initially, two person effort for 30 days
• Iterative process, 180 days
• Start the dialogue
• Promote common understanding:
• warfighter problem
• as is processes
• capability requirements
• gaps/shortcomings
• potential solutions
• Basis for experimentation
UNCLASS
Indicators of the Problem
The Services applythe FAR differently…varying contracting thresholds
Dr. GanslerReport, 2007
Commission onWartime
Contracting, 2011
Estimated $31B - $61Blost to waste, fraud, and abuse
DefenseScience BoardReport, 2005
Defense acquisition is:encumbered …top-heavy, risk-averse,too much bureaucracy,highly centralized
Joint ConceptFor Logistics
2010
OCS policy, doctrine and processes are immature and must rapidly evolve and respond to warfighter demands
As of 231400 Aug 14 8
UNCLASS
Shaping OCS JC Transformational Ideas
Grant limited acquisition and contracting authorityto the GCC
Elevate and expand the authority of military officials responsible for contingency contracting on the Joint Staff, the combatant commanders’ staffs, and in the military services
where joint capability needs are not being met with Service centric processes, the Secretary must turn to joint processes and entities for their realization
CCDRs have operational Requirements; must drive DoD resource allocation ;Build capacity in CCDRs to enable a stronger role in resource allocation
Commission on Wartime Contracting Defense Science BoardDefense Science Board
Center for Strategic and International Studies
“institutionalize the changes necessary to influence a cultural shift in how we view, account, and plan for contracted….support in the contingency environment.” Sec Def 9As of 231400 Aug 14
UNCLASS
The Operational Challenge
The Operational Challenge
How will future joint forces with constrained resources protect U.S.
national interests against increasingly capable enemies in an
uncertain, complex, rapidly changing, and increasingly transparent
world?
• To protect U.S. national interests, the Joint Force will need to succeed in:• CT and IW• Deter and Defeat Aggression• Project Power Despite A2/AD• Counter WMD• Operate Effectively in Cyberspace
and Space• Maintain a Safe, Secure, and
Effective Nuclear Deterrent• Defend the Homeland and Provide
Support to Civil Authorities• Provide a Stabilizing Presence• Conduct Stability and COIN• Conduct HA, DR, Other Operations
• Maintain a ready and capable force, even as we reduce our overall capacity
UNCLASS
11
Blueprint for the Joint Force in 2020
• Fiscal Constraints
• Reduced Uniformed Capacity
• Technology Advances
• Rapid Pace
• Agility
• Integrate partners capabilities
• Joint Interoperability/ Interdependence
Future Operating Environment
As of 231400 Aug 14
UNCLASS
CCJO: JF2020 Solution
Central IdeaGlobally integrated operations: A globally postured Joint Force quickly combines capabilities with itself and mission partners across domains, echelons, geographic boundaries, and organizational affiliations. These networks of forces and partners form, evolve, dissolve, and reform in different arrangements in time and space with significantly greater fluidity than today’s Joint Force.
Key Elements• Mission command• Seize, retain, and exploit the initiative• Global agility• Partnering• Flexibility in establishing Joint Forces• Cross-domain synergy• Use of flexible, small-footprint capabilities• Increasingly discriminate to minimize
unintended consequences
23 Select Implications for Joint Force 2020• Command and Control• Intelligence• Fires• Movement and Maneuver• Protection• Sustainment• Partnership Strategies
As of 231400 Aug 1412
UNCLASS
• OCS is a critical enabling capability for JF 2020• Requires resources from Total Force partners, including contractors• Increase Responsiveness and Accountability of contracted support • Guide future DOTMLPF-P OCS capability development• Solution must be multi-dimensional
– No one “Silver Bullet”
• Focus on Unity of Effort … respect Service’s Title 10• Maintain separation of contracting and command authorities • Repurpose/reorganize existing OCS capabilities• Leverage existing, new or emerging tools & systems of record where
they exist
As of 231400 Aug 14
Emerging OCS Themes for JF 2020
13
Contracted Support is a fully interdependent JF 2020 capability
UNCLASS
2013 - OCS JC Project Framework*
Legend
ConceptVersion
MajorBrief
JSAPRedTeam
Data CollectionAnalysis Plan
WritingWorkshop
FinalReport
HotWash
Experiment
AdjudicationComment Review Matrix
Jan/Feb/Mar Apr/May/Jun Jul/Aug/SepConcept
Development
Transition
Analysis
Evaluation
V0.5 V0.7 V0.9Workshop # 3
GO/FOJSAP
LOEReport
JSAP CRM 1
V1.0
CRM 2
OCS FCIB
LOG FCB,
JROC, VCJCS
DraftPlan
Plan
LOE
HotWash
Transition SolutionsFYs 14 - 16
LOEAnalysis
Oct/Nov/Dec
V0.1 V0.3
TableTop
Analysis
As of 231400 Aug 14 14
*2012 -- year for concept development See slides 42 – 52….iterations
UNCLASS
Institutionalize OCS across the DOTMLPF-P force development processes to optimize contracted support for Joint Force 2020
15
Approved OCS Solution Framework
Joint Force 2020
As of 231400 Aug 14
18 Months and 10 iterations for the Solution framework
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14 16
Requirements to institutionalize OCS across the DoD include:• DoD-wide OCS Joint Proponent(s) to lead DOTMLPF-P capability development• Education to promote a cultural shift on how JF 2020 views, plans and accounts for
contracted support• Multi-disciplinary military and civilian personnel with specialized OCS training and
experience• OCS integrated across joint functions and into doctrine• Embed OCS in Joint, Service, live and virtual training• Total Force partners networked with innovative OCS tools, data and processes
Requirements to operationalize OCS in the field include: • Enduring, scalable OCS Mission Integrator (OMI) at Geographic Combatant
Commands to lead OCS coordination • Rapidly deployable, trained and ready contracting organizations or capabilities,
along with improved authorities and processes to conduct theater contingency contracting.
JF 2020 OCS
UNCLASS
Concept
OCS Joint Concept Transition
As of 231400 Aug 14
Idea
JROCM 148-11 Assigned JS J4 to lead OCS JC DevelopmentJROCM 159-13 Approved Concept and assigned JS J4 to lead implementationJROCM 060-14 Approved Transition Plan
WarfighterSolutions &
Force Development
DoctrineOrganization
TrainingMateriel
Leadership & EducationPersonnel
17
TransitionPlan
OCS Joint Concept Implementation
JF 2020OIF/OEF
The Impetus
OCS Action Plan JROCM 112-11 OCS Joint Concept
Hu
ma
n C
ap
ital
JP 4
-10
Str
ateg
ic G
uid
anc
e
OM
I
Join
t P
rop
on
ent
Th
eate
r C
on
trac
tin
g
Cap
abili
ty
ND
AA
Rq
mts
OC
S R
ead
ines
s
18As of 231400 Aug 14
JROCM 159-13JROCM 060-14
OCS JC Solution Pathways
OMI Pilot w/ PACOM
- DAWDF- SOPs- Handbook
Culture ChangeNDAA 2013OCS CDGJ/PMEOCS Learning Framework
- TBC- CAD- KOs contingency focused
- Manage risk; not at risk- Reach back- Training- CCMDs ID Reqs for LSC & JTSCC in PLANS – demand signal
OCSJX 14, 15UJTsDRRSDoctrine Portfolio MngtOCSC (Army)JOPEC
OCS COPOCS KMJCIDS MaterielCDD/CPDCBEBusiness and OpsRequirementsData elements
Manpower StudyDAWDFAdditional Skill ID(s)Multi-disciplinary SpecialtyHuman Cap StrtgyCertifications
Joint Proponents
Principal Staff Assistant
- OCS FCIB- DODD/I- OCS Governance
ServiceCSA
As of 231400 Aug 14 19
OCS Action Plan
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14
So What – The OMI Operationalizes OCS
20
Chairman’s Key Themes:• Achieve our National Objectives in our
Current Conflicts• Develop Joint Force 2020• Renew Our Commitment to the
Profession of Arms• Keep Faith with our Military Family
Joint Force 2020
OMI operationalizes OCS by integratingContracted Support (part of the Total Force) capabilities with military operations
UNCLASS
21
JF 2020 needs the OCS Mission Integrator to optimize contracted support.
As of 131600 Mar 14
Contractors on the Battlefield…costly and like herding cats—if not planned, integrated into operations and managed
UNCLASS
OMI Demo Purpose
• Establish warfighting enabling capability at USPACOM now • Fill current gap
• Plan and integrate OCS into operations and training
• Improve acquisition processes through training and continuous improvement in the qualifications and experience of:• Acquisition workforce • Non-acquisition personnel charged with contract integration and
contractor management
• Inform future OCS force development• Transition concept solution to warfighter• Assess and validate JF 2020 DOTMLPF-P capabilities outlined in
the OCS Joint Concept
As of 231400 Aug 14 22
OCS laboratory in an operational environment to make OCS more responsive and accountable for JF 2020
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14 23WIN, WIN for current and future OCS
Stakeholder Benefits– What’s in it for us
• Improves acquisition training for both acquisition work force as well as non-acquisition personnel
• Acquisition personnel in operational positions• Consistent with DOD Total Force management• Common processes increasing efficiency and
effectiveness• Institutionalized OCS processes across OSD, JCS
and Services
• Supports Joint Force 2020 vision• Transition concept solutions to warfighter• OCS laboratory informs OCS force development
processes• OCS integrated into CCMD exercises• Facilitates cultural shift on how the joint force views
contracted support
• Provides joint warfighter enabling capability• Spans current operations, future operations, and
future planning • OCS integrated across B2C2WGs• Complete plans IAW DODI 3020.41 standards• Increase capabilities and freedom of action
DoD Joint Staff
ServicesCombant Commands/JTF• Provides warfighter enabling capability to
components• Improves OCS processes for contracting integration and contractor management• Improves OCS responsiveness and accountability• Rapidly integrates contracted support capabilities• Nexus for contracting and command authorities• Maintains Service responsibility for contracting• OCS integrated across warfighting functions
UNCLASS
Phase 0 (Part A)• Aug – Nov ‘13• Shaping, Planning & Transition Agreement
• Secure DAWDF funding• Draft Approved Transition Agreement
Phase I – Lead OCSJX 15 & OCSIC FOC• Jun ‘14- May ’15• Detailed POAM; Training intensive phase• Develop internal SOPs / establish working relations across PACOM Staff
• Successfully complete OCS JX 15• 30% CONPLANS to DODI 3020.41 Standards
Phase II - OMI FOC, Talisman Sabre, OCSJX 16 • Jun ‘15 – May ‘16• OMI Proficient in essential capabilities and tasks
• Successful integration into USPACOM B2C2WG
• 80% CONPLANS to DODI 3020.41 Standards• Consider JDAL and POM actions
Phase III – OMI validation, PACOM Exercise, OCSJX 17 and enduring capability
• Jun ‘16 – May ‘17• Enduring OMI
–JDAL billets and POM actions complete–Transition from contractor demo to enduring cell –Capable of forward deployment–Expandable from cell to a center –Measureable improvements to contracted support
responsiveness and accountability– 100% CONPLANS to DODI 3020.41 Standards–Results inform other OCS force development efforts
OMI Demo CONOPS
Phase 0 (Part B)• Dec ‘13 – May ‘14• Finalize PWS, requirements, & RFP
• Develop Acquisition Strategy
• Let Contract(s)
24
Success = Approved CONOPS, Signed Transition Agreement, and funds MIPR’d from DPAP, contract(s) let
Success = OCS interdependent capability of USPACOM; OMI enduring capability
Success = OMI participates in OCSJX 16, fully integrated into USPACOM staff structure and exercises
Success = OMI participates in OCSJX 15 and achieves OCSIC FOC
See back up Slides 57 – 60
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14
Transition Agreement
25
• Project Charter for continuity for demo for three years• Documents principle stakeholder roles and responsibilities • Translates JCD&E results into the appropriate DOTMLPF
pathway to implementation• Defines status reporting process and procedures• Details products to be delivered • Stipulates the follow on actions that the sponsor or
stakeholders will take with the products from the project team
• OMI Demo CONOPS as a supporting appendix
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14 26
Stakeholder Responsibilities
JS J4 USPACOM J4
• Concept Implementation Lead• Resource coordinator for DAWDF• Track J4 costs and consolidated total costs • Provide concept, planning, technical, and
training SME support• Incorporate OMI demo in OCS Strat Coms• Incorporate OMI products to advance/
inform OCS DOTMLPF-P force development
• Develop and Maintain POAM• Reconcile planned costs and forecast
future travel and labor costs • OCSJX 15 host CCMD• Establish OCSIC in year 1 and transitions
to OMI in year 2 • Annual Report assessing progress
• Measureable criteria to gauge progress
• Host semi-annual management reviews• Assess OMI and OMI related effects,
capabilities & tasks (spreadsheet)• Special emphasis areas of materiel and
personnel (manpower)• Share OMI SOPs, tools, products, etc…, to
be basis for shelf ready products
Not all inconclusive
UNCLASS
# Phase 1 thru 5 Staffing Model--CCMD
Phase 0 thru 5 OMI Demonstration Staffing Additions
01 06/GS OCS Div Chief PACOM fill from existing military staff
02 05 /GS Plans Branch Chf (ASI3C) Demonstration Staff (KTR)
03 04/GS Dep Plans Br Chf (ASI3C) Demonstration Staff (KTR)¹
04 04/GS Plans Off(51C/1102/KO Qual) JCASO Equivalent Fill
05 E-7 Plans NCO (ASI3C) Demonstration Staff (KTR)¹
06 05/GS Ops Br Chf (ASI3C) PACOM fill from existing military staff
07 04 Ops Off(51C/1102/KO Qual) Demonstration Staff (KTR)¹
08 03 Ops Off (ASI3C) JCASO Equivalent Fill
09 E-8 Ops NCO (ASI3C) Not needed for demonstration
10 LNO (to Ops or LOG) (ASI3C) Demonstration Staff (KTR)¹
11 04 /GS Analyst w/ PMO trng Demonstration Staff (KTR)
12 CW1 or E-6 Network Operator (OCS Sys) Not needed for demonstration
13 E-7 Data Mngr (OCS Sys) Not needed for demonstration
TOTAL KTR ADD for OMI Demonstration Staff 6 KTRS Added
¹Temporarily assign as planners to Service Components or contracting organizations (CSB or A7K) as necessary
Plans
Operations/Training/
Exercises
Knowledge Mngt(Analysis/Automation)
Div Chief
DRAFT
USPACOM OMI KTR DEMONSTRATION STAFFING ESTIMATE
As of 231400 Aug 14 27
Status of GS
Term OMI
Chief TBD
UNCLASS
# Position PersonFTE Est² (years 1 & 3)
FTE Est² (year 2) Trips/
Yr¹
01 06 OCSSD Div Chief
JS J4 OCSSD fill from existing military staff
10% 10% 2
02 Project Mgt Clark Driscoll 20% 30% 2
03 Planning Support Lew Sigmon 20% 30% 2
04 Training Support Courtney Turner 20% 30% 2
05
OMI Integration & Transformation Brandon Cholek 80% 100% 3
Total1.4 KTR FTEs
1.9 KTR FTEs
1.4 KTR FTEs
¹Add 1 additional trip in year #1 ²Increase by 5-15% for year #2
Planning Support
Training/Concept Support
OCSSDDiv Chief
JS J4 OCSSD Support to OMI STAFFING ESTIMATE
JS J4 OCSSD Functions• OMI/OCSJX Integration w/ Action Plan/JF2020• Reach Back expertise/matrix to J46 (see colors)• JOPEC Initial & follow on custom version • OCSJX-15 Planning and Execution Integration• Assist in POA&M/Org/plans• JMR Refinement from OMI inputs• Assess OMI POA&M, metrics of success, report• O/T in approx. 1 exercise per year
Assumptions• Contract go – start June 2014• COL Gillum on board thru Sept ’14 and replaced (COL Lanier)• USPACOM is lead CCMD for OCSJX-15• Potential larger scope JX-15/16 to include joint log • Leverage all ongoing OCSSD tasks & expertise• Separate contracts (or task orders) for OCSSD and USPACOM• Maximum use of TELECONF/DCO-Class/Unclass
As of 231400 Aug 14 28
Current/projected transformationWorkload not supportable, see slide 59
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 1429
OCS Demo Key Outcomes
• OMI Organization• OCSIC Organization(s)—varying echelons• Position Descriptions • Required/desired skills, training, experience• TCP and OPLANS complete• Internal SOPs (within OMI)• External SOPs with customers, GCC staff, components, CSAs, Interorganizational• Annual report of progress, accomplishment and challenges • JLLIS input on OCS OILs• Exercises, operations, TSC• Special Emphasis on Materiel – automation and tool requirements– Knowledge Mngt• How to Conduct Assessment of OCS effectiveness in operational environment• Risk Mitigation measures • Feedback on OCS planning and training• Assessment/refinement of OMI and OMI related Effects, Capabilities and Tasks• Off the shelf product/guide to establish an OMI/OCSIC• Real world examples of cost avoidance and decreased W,F, A• Examples of increases accountability and responsiveness (ops, exercises, plans)
End of Demo – Is USPACOM willing to establish an enduring OMI?
Work in progress
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 1430
Potential Measures Ideas
Work in progress – ideas for PACOM J46
Contract Integration
OtherContracting Support
Contractor Management
• Speed (responsiveness) of contracting in operations• Visibility, data base of contract related data• Improved contract closeouts• Reduced incidents of W, F, A• Id cost avoidance and savings• Effective relationships with contracting orgs• Improved knowledge/awareness of contracting capabilities limitations• Effective JCSB involvement
• Increased OCS awareness (vertical and horizontal)• OCS Strat Comms – get our message out there• Positive/Negative press for OCS
• Leadership support • Recognition of contractors as part of Total Force• OCS integrated into CCMD and Component Exercises• # trained JOPEC and 3c personnel• DRRS OCS reporting and trends• Enduring OMI/OCSIC vs ad hoc• Increased CDRs options and freedom of action• OILS in JLLIS
• Actions to resolve OCS challenges• Requests and frequency for OCS training • Service Industry Interactions
• Improved visibility/accountability of contractors• Component CORs identified and trained• # incidents attributable to contracted support• Integration of OCS automation tools • Effective Contractor Management Plans promulgated• Assessments of contractor involvement in OPS, exercises
• JRRB process improvements• Speed, efficiency of requirements generation and determinations• Detailed, complete Annex Ws, aOEs, Estimates• Id requirements redundancies and inefficiencies• Measure/assess contracted support operational effectiveness• Assessment collection plan developed and executed • Effective integration into B2C2WG• OCS Knowledge Mngt & COP processes in place
• # and range of membership participants
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 1431
OMI APAN Collaboration Site
• SharePoint Knowledge Mngt collaboration site established in May 14• Unclass, restricted membership• Location / Name: https://wss.apan.org/s/omi• Only 5 members now………
• Repository of OCS Joint Concept development and OMI products• V0.1 Concept• Baseline Assessment Review• Info papers, briefs, etc…• OMI CONOPS and Transition Agreement
• Brandon current Group Owner• Transition to OMI ownership …if want to maintain
J46 Decision to Maintain
UNCLASS
Key Takeaways
32
• Win, win, win for: JS Title 10 Responsibilities, Services & USPACOM
• OMI demo informs current and future OCS force development efforts
• Initial commitment for DAWDF funding demonstration for three (3) yearso Supports acquisition training and expertiseo Three-year demonstration period due to complete cycle time for planning, staffing and coordinationo ROM of less than $8.5 M is an investment in JF 2020
o ROI through savings and/or cost avoidance and reduce waste, fraud and abuse
• Transition Agreement is the charter o Signatory partners ID success criteria and tracko CONOPS is an Appendix
• Linked with OCSJX 15 -17 and CCMD Exercises• Effective use of travel and exercise funds• Spirals into CCMD exercises
• Strategic Messaging Opportunitieso Real world enabling capability nowo OCS fully interdependent capability of JF 2020
• OMI operationalizes OCS for CCMDs now, and for JF 2020 in the future• Contracted support integrated into military operations and exercises• Optimizes Total Force capabilities• Facilitates culture shift how the DOD views, plans and accounts for contracted support
As of 231400 Aug 14
33
OCSIC OMI
Lead OCS planning and integration across staff, steady state, theater campaign plans, operations and exercises
Primarily phase 0, IV, V All phases and participates in current ops, future ops and future plans across the joint functions; reach capability to components
Provide OCS-related advice to CDR and Staff Reactive, limited bandwidth, ad hoc arrangement; planners not part of CCMD
Proactive, established relationships and processes, trust and confidence; integrated into battle rhythm and CDRs decision cycle
OCS related policies & guidance coordinated, documented and executed
Complex, large ops will consume limited cell personnel; reach back to JCASO and DPAP, PS
Focus area/duty for one of the OMI staff
Establish and maintain OCS COP No personnel qualified to conduct data mining and analysis
PM, ORSA and IT skills to collect, analyze and integrate essential data elements from authoritative sources for holistic solutions to complex problems; provide input to KM and ops COP (the real COP)
Establish and run OCS working Groups; participate in B2C2WGs
Limited participation, Separate plans and ops sections to participate and lead B2C2WGs
Coordinate interorganizational OCS matters Needs augmentation Focus area/duty for one of the OMI staff
Coordinate Theater Business Clearance and Contract Administration Delegation
Needs augmentation Plan/coordinate preapproved authorities and processes by focus area/duty for one of the OMI staff
Common OCS Tasks – OMI vs OCSIC
As of 231400 Aug 14
34
OCSIC OMI
Secretariat and participate in OCS related boards Full time position during ops at expense of planning, ops,
Secretariat and participate in OCS related boards; implement automated and virtual forums; conducts independent analysis of requirements for consistency to CDR intent, priorities of effort and support and makes recommendations to board. Examines opportunities and efficiencies for theater-wide/JOA common goods and services
Conduct OCS Analysis of the operational environment and provide input to the J2 JIPOE
Conducted ad hoc Maintains OCS aOE and EstimateCore competency
Conduct OCS training with staff and components Limited bandwidth Has bandwidth to develop relationships with components to conduct common OCS training to pursue common OCS processes
Conduct analysis during planning and ops for establishing or changing theater contracting organization structure
Defers to supporting contracting organizations
Ensures contracted capabilities, constraints, and risks are adequately integrated into plans and ops
Limited B2C2WG participation; needs augmentation
Trained in risk assessments and mitigation measures and part of CDRs assessment WG
Monitor OCS, contracting, and corresponding financial mngt (FM) functions with joint ops
Needs augmentation Has ORSA, PM, and IT skills sets to collect and analyze data and coordinate with FM as required.
As of 231400 Aug 14
Common OCS Tasks – OMI vs OCSIC
35
OCSIC OMI
Monitor OCS, contracting, and corresponding financial mngt (FM) functions with joint ops
Needs augmentation Has ORSA, PM, and IT skills sets to collect and analyze data and coordinate with FM as required.
Able to conduct OCS operational assessments to measure effectiveness of contracted support
Need augmentation and training
Focus area for Ops and analysis sections working as part of the CDRs assessment WG; develops metrics and corresponding collection plan
Monitor trends in contracting, unintended consequences, and complexity of contracts being awarded relative to operations
Dependent on contracting org and limited collection gathering
Ops and analysis sections trained in multi-source collection from ops and contracting units and staffs
Able to deploy an OMI (OCS-like capability) core element forward into operational area to support contingencies and exercises
Dependent on JCASO MST
OMI capable of split based ops and expanding from cell to center for large scale, complex ops
Ensures OCS capabilities and processes are integrated into joint training and exercises
Challenge to get complex, well thought out themes and storylines into initial planning conferences; often comes at expense of planning
Training and exercises integral part of OMI functions and consistent with reinforcing train as we fight
As of 231400 Aug 14
Common OCS Tasks – OMI vs OCSIC
UNCLASS
36
OCS 1.0—OCS Mission Integrator Effect: OCS Mission Integrator is an enduring, scalable capability at Combatant Command and select Service Components responsible for operationalizing OCS throughout the area of responsibility. Coordinates OCS activities with the staff, Service Components, combat support agencies, interagency partners, nongovernmental organizations operating, and service industry representatives.
OMI Capabilities: OCS 1.0-001. Able to lead OCS planning and execution to integrate contracting and contractor management
into joint operations.OCS 1.0-002. Able to develop and manage command policies and procedures to validate and prioritize
requirements determination for contracted support. OCS 1.0-003. Able to serve as the JRRB secretariat, participate in contract related boards and other boards,
bureaus, cells, centers and working groups. OCS 1.0-004. Able to advise command and staff on OCS benefits, risks and mitigating strategies for employment
of contracted support. OCS 1.0-005. Able to conduct OCS operational assessments to measure effectiveness of contracted support in
fulfilling operational objectives. OCS 1.0-006. Able to project OCS information to the common operational picture and to inform the command’s
knowledge management system.OCS 1.0-007. Able to deploy an OMI core element forward into the operational area to support contingency
operations when required.OCS 1.0-008. Able to integrate OCS into CCMD and Service Component training. OCS 1.0-009. Able to collect and enter OCS related observations, insights and lessons learned into JLLIS.OCS 1.0-010. Able to facilitate command engagement with regional service industry providers.
OMI Essential Capabilities
As of 231400 Aug 14
Transition to E, C, T Spreadsheets
UNCLASS
Comments?
Guidance
As of 231400 Aug 14 37
UNCLASS
Back Ups
As of 231400 Aug 14 38
UNCLASS
Joint Concept Development—Draft CJCSM 3010
Once approved for development, a concept proposal follows the development process of OPSDEPS Reviews, Experimentation, Red Teaming, and GO/FO Staffing, culminating in a final review by the JCS Tank and signature by the Chairman.
LOE/Experi-
mentation
v.0.5 JSAP Staffing
JCB Brief / JROC
Approval Nov. 8, 2011
JCD&E GO/FO
Approval
v.0.9 JCB
Approval Brief
JROC Approval
39As of 231400 Aug 14
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 1440
Insights, deductions & opportunities
OCS ICD Satisfied
Problem Statement & Central Idea
OCS: Transformational
Gaps
OCS/FM/RM: Baseline Processes
Existing Authorities & Current Ops
Inform Baseline Assessment Review
Operational Contract Support Joint Concept
Assumptions, constraints
Literature review
Decompose
Baseline Assessment Methodology
UNCLASS
41
Page 59. In any case, introducing a transformational capability will meet with considerable resistance, as they are by their nature at odds with the status quo. For example, the introduction ofmechanized ground forces made horse cavalry irrelevant, but the members of that communitydid not give up their existence without a fight. If you uncover a fundamental weakness that agame-changing capability could solve, you will face reflexive and ferocious opposition fromwhatever horse cavalry is threatened by your proposals, as well as (justifiable) skepticism fromeveryone else. So, if you are going to propose a pursuing such a capability, plan on a fight. Think through whowill be opposed and why, and formulate a good defense. Do not underestimate the ability of thebureaucracy to make a good idea so painful that even its originator is relieved to see it die.
CBA User’s Guide Thoughts
As of 231400 Aug 14
UNCLASS
As of 091600 Jan 1242
Enforcers. Monitor your concept and report to their organizations if it appears the CBA
supports or refutes any of their organizations’ equities
Saboteurs. Directed to slow down your concept so that it doesn’t interfere with initiatives
being promoted by their organizations
Zealots. Waging personal campaigns to cure certain areas they believe to be defective in DoD, and view your concept as a means to those ends
Bloviators. Provide long philosophical speeches that may or may not make any sense, but prevent your meetings from accomplishing anything
Potted Plants. Attending meetings because their organization has no idea what else to do with them
Conspiracy Theorists. Convinced that your assessment is a cover story for a secret plot to destroy their interests
War profiteers. Attend your meetings to as a means to generate work for their organizations
Evaders. Directed to ensure that your concept doesn’t result in additional work for theirorganizations
Professionals. Forthright and competent individuals who want to get you relevant information anduseful advice that will help you succeed.
Concept Developer Participants
Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) User’s GuideVersion 3, March 2009
UNCLASSOCS Joint Concept ProposalAs-Is Process
As-Is
JFC
Financial & Resource
Management
Contracting Authority
(HCA)MN IA
Comptroller
Svc 8’sOSD/ CAPE
Services
NATOUS GovtOSD/
DPAP
As of 231400 Aug 1443
UNCLASSOCS Joint Concept Proposal:As-Is vs. To-Be
To-Be
JFC
Unified Sourcing
Entity
Unity of Effort via Unity of Command
Contracting Authority
(HCA)
Financial & Resource Management MN IA
As-Is
JFC
Financial & Resource
Management
Contracting Authorities
MN
IA
Comptroller
Svc 8’sCAPE Services
NATOUS Govt
As of 231400 Aug 1444
UNCLASS
Vendor Payment, Money Trail, EFT, Currency Finance
Performance Measure
Funds Accountable
Governance
Theater/ContingencyContracting
Contract
Systems
External
DFARSDoDD 5000
ContractTimelines
Requirements Determination4- 25 Weeks
Contract Development2-15 Weeks
Contract Execution/
AdministrationClose Out Profit
Contractor PWS, SOW, SPOT, UCMJ, GFS,
Resource MNGT
Fund RequirementsDoD FMRDoD 7000
Fiscal Law, PBF, Accounting
Requiring Activity
Mission
Services/ComponentsCOCOMJFCAgenciesTitle X
As Is Business Processes Silos
As of 231400 Aug 14 45
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14 46
Unified Sourcing
Entity
Unified Sourcing EntityWhat USE does:Integrates and Synchronizes all process:
Planning OCS & FM for all PhasesRequirements determinationPrioritizationContracting/acquisitionFunding and Resource MngtConstructionContract ManagementContract CloseoutReconciliation of Resources expended with measured effectsAccountabilityAssess Effects of OCS and FMMeasurements: $ spent
$ spent on specific lines of effort $ spent for contractors
$ spent in geographic area $ spent over time
Money TrailForecast spend plan
What Use Provides JFC:Single OCS and FM POC
Common Priorities and PurposeCommon Operating PictureAlign contracting, resource management with operationsSingle Sourcing EntityAbility to measure effectsUnity of Effort through Unity of CommandAccountability of Resources expendedDecreased WFA
Mission EffectsSuccess
Finance
Contracting
Contractor
Resource MNGT
Requiring Activity
JFC
UNCLASS
ContractTimelines
Requirements Determination4- 25 Weeks
Contract Development2-15 Weeks
Contract Execution/
AdministrationClose Out
Vendor Payment, Money Trail, EFT, Currency Finance
Funds Accountable
Theater/ContingencyContracting
Contract
Systems
External
DFARSDoDD 5000
Contractor ProfitPWS, SOW, SPOT, UCMJ, GFS,
Resource MNGT
Fund RequirementsDoD FMRDoD 7000
Fiscal Law, PBF, Accounting
To Be Effects Based OCS
Governance
Requiring Activity
MissionEffects/Success
Services/ComponentsCOCOMJFCAgenciesTitle 10
JFCUnified Sourcing
Entity
DRAFT
As of 231400 Aug 14 47
UNCLASS
ContractTimelines
Requirements Determination4- 25 Weeks
Contract Development2-15 Weeks
Contract Execution/
AdministrationClose Out
To Be Effects Based OCS Process
As of 231400 Aug 14 48
Resource MNGT
FundRequirementsDoD FMR
DoD 7000Fiscal Law, PBF, Accounting
Vendor Payment, Money Trail, EFT, Currency
Finance Funds Accountable
Performance Measure
Governance
Requiring Activity
Mission EffectsSuccess
Service ComponentsGCCJFCAgencies/OtherTitle 10
Profit
Contractor PWS/SOW, RUF, SPOT, GFS, UCMJ (Limited)
Supplies &Services
Theater/ContingencyContracting Contract
Systems
External
DFARSDoDD 5000
Faster
Unified Sourcing
Entity
UNCLASS
ContractTimelines
Requirements Determination4- 25 Weeks
Contract Development2-15 Weeks
Contract Execution/
AdministrationClose Out
Synchronizing Processes with Mission
As of 231400 Aug 14
Faster
Unified Sourcing
Entity
Resource MNGT
FundRequirementsDoD FMR
DoD 7000Fiscal Law, PBF, Accounting
Vendor Payment, Money Trail, EFT, Currency
Finance Funds Accountable
Performance Measure
Governance
Requiring Activity
Mission EffectsSuccess
Service ComponentsGCCJFCAgencies/OtherTitle 10
Profit
Contractor PWS/SOW, RUF, SPOT, GFS, UCMJ (Limited)
Supplies &Services
Theater/ContingencyContracting Contract
Systems
External
DFARSDoDD 5000
JFC
49
Ungrouped
UNCLASS
General Mission Oversight
C
RequiringActivity
Resource Manager/
G-8
FinanceSpt Tm
ContractingOfficer
Contractor
Solicitation, Source Selection, Award
Invoice Close out
CORMonitoring
Performance / Deliveries
CORAcceptance
Payment
“Delivered Support”Synchronized with
“Mission Task”
PlanningInitial In-theater
Award Fee Board
JFC/ARFOR JARB/ARB
Required steps
Situational dependent steps
Contract Management
Legal
OC
S T
eam
Mem
bers
Funding
Acquisition Ready Requirement Packet
development & approval
Contractor
As Is OCS & Contracting Process
Army GTA 50As of 231400 Aug 14
UNCLASS
OCS JC Solution
OCS Mission Integrator
Theater Contingency Contracting
DoD-wide OCS Executive Agent
DFARS
As of 231400 Aug 14
PersonnelManagement
Optimized OCS …
…for JF 2020
Supporting Elements
Leader Development
Training Network
51
UNCLASS
Ass
uran
ce/
Ris
k M
ngt
Net
wor
k
Enable JFC
Enable JFC
JFC
GCC OCS Mission Integrator
JF 2020
DoD-wide OCS Executive Agent
Theater Contracting and Organization Construct
OCS JC Tiered Framework
As of 231400 Aug 14 52
UNCLASS
ContractTimelines
Requirements Determination4- 25 Weeks
Contract Development2-15 Weeks
Contract Execution/
AdministrationClose Out
To Be Effects Based OCS Process
As of 231400 Aug 14 53
Faster
Unified Sourcing
Entity
Resource MNGT
FundRequirementsDoD FMR
DoD 7000Fiscal Law, PBF, Accounting
Vendor Payment, Money Trail, EFT, Currency
Finance Funds Accountable
Performance Measure
Governance
Requiring Activity
Mission EffectsSuccess
Service ComponentsGCCJFCAgencies/OtherTitle 10
Profit
Contractor PWS/SOW, RUF, SPOT, GFS, UCMJ (Limited)
Supplies &Services
Theater/ContingencyContracting Contract
Systems
External
DFARSDoDD 5000
JFC
UNCLASS
OCS Lead Entity
DoD
IA / MN
NGO / PVO
Unity of Effort
Coordinate and Collaborate
Awareness and Visibility
Deconflict
FM/RM
OCS/Contracting
C2/OPS/Intel
OCSLeadEntity
Integrateand
Synchronize
As of 231400 Aug 1454
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 1455
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14 56
JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB -SEP
Component Socialization Analysis Eval Criteria JP vs JPs resolution JP Roles, Respon- sibilities, Authorities FCIB Brf, 26 Aug Workshop 4, 17
Sep
Develop Draft Implement Plan
Workshop 6, 9 Dec
Assessment v.7 (JSAP)
Assessment v0.9 (JSAP)
FCIB Brf, Feb Assessment v1.0 Develop Implementation Workshop 7, 11 Feb OCS Action
Plan
OCS Governance PSA Roles, Respon- sibilities, Authorities Component Willing- ness Assessment Recommendations DODD/I options Workshop 5, 23 Oct FCIB Brf, Nov ___ Assessment v.5
Form Workgroup Assessment Objectives POAM Workshop 1, 2 Jun V0.1 Outline Workshop 2, 8 Jul Component OCS Capability Research V0.3 Workshop 3, 31 Jul
OCS Joint Proponent Assessment Milestones
Roles, Respon-sibilities & Authorities.
Courses of Action,
ComponentSocialization
Form Assessment Team, Develop
POAM, and Research,
Component Capability,
Competency
Analysis, CoA Selection,
ComponentWillingness,Governance,
JSAP
OCS FCIB Final
Implement
Draft Implementation
Plan,
Recommendations,
JSAP
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 1457
UNCLASS
Purpose: • Addresses current OCS capability gaps to
plan and integrate OCS into operations, training and to increase leadership awareness
• Improve acquisition processes through training and continuous improvement in the qualifications and experience of acquisition workforce and non-acquisition personnel
• Informs OCS DOTMLPF-P capability force development to make OCS more responsive and accountable for JF 2020
ROM:
• Year 1, FYs 14-15 - $2,854,218 • Year 2, FYs 15-16 - $2,863,412• Year 3, FYs 16-17 - $2,775,490 • Total - $8,493,120
Partners:
• JS J4 OCSSD – Concept Sponsor
• USPACOM (J46) – OMI Transition Agent
• DASD (DPAP) – Resource Sponsor
Scope:
• Address how CCMDS (USPACOM), joint task forces (JTFs), Service components, and
subordinate commands can better integrate future OCS capabilities to achieve desired
operational effects in the 2020-2030 timeframe. • Required OCS capabilities span the range of
military operations from the strategic to the operational and tactical levels, and through all
phases of operations (0-V). • OCS spans Joint Functions
As of 231400 Aug 14
OCS Mission Integrator (OMI) Demonstration
58
OCS laboratory in an operational environment to make OCS more responsive and accountable for JF 2020
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14
OMI Demo Phase 0
• Part A- Shaping and Planning (August – November 2013)• Finalize CONOPS & roles-responsibilities for
USPACOM, J4 and DPAP, • Secure DAWDF Funding (DASD-DPAP)• Draft and coordinate Transition Agreement
• Part B- Acquisition (December 2013 – May 2014)• Develop Overall acquisition strategy• Finalize PWS and RFP
59
Success = Approved CONOPS, Signed Transition Agreement, and funds MIPR’d from DPAP
Success = Award two contracts: 1 each for PACOM (6 FTEs) and J4 (1.4 FTEs) GS 14/15 Term OMI Chief TBD
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14
OMI Demo Phase I
Complete OCSJX 15 and Full Operational Capability of OCSIC• PoP: June 2014 – May 2015• Complete OCSJX 15 and achieve FOC for OCS IC• Considerable Training & Travel Requirements: cASM &
JOPEC for USPACOM KTRs • Develop detailed action plan and internal SOPs • Familiarity with PACOM AOR & establish relationships
across staff and components• Successfully complete OCSJX 15 and achieve FOC for OMI• 30% CONPLANS to DODI 3020.41 Standards
60
Success = OMI participates in OCSJX 15 and achieves OCSIC Full Operational Capability
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14
OMI Demo Phase II
OMI Full Operational Capability (FOC) and OCSJX-16
• PoP: June 2015 – May 2016
• Transition from OCSIC to OMI
• OMI able to demonstrate proficiency in essential capabilities and tasks
• Successfully integrated into USPACOM B2C2WG structure
• OMI’s involvement in OCSJX-16 milestone decision after OCSJX-15
• 80% CONPLANS to DODI 3020.41 Standards
• Start JDAL billets and POM actions to sustain/resource OMI
61
Success = OMI FOC, participates in OCSJX 16 and has become fully integrated into USPACOM staff structure
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14
OMI Demo Phase III
OMI validation and transition to enduring capability• PoP: June 2016 – May 2017
• OMI is FOC • JDAL billets and POM actions complete• Transition from contractor demo to enduring cell • Capable of forward deployment• Develop contingency plan to expand from cell to a center • Measureable improvements to contracted support
responsiveness and accountability• 100% CONPLANS to DODI 3020.41 Standards• OMI & OCS fully integrated into PACOM exercises• Results inform other OCS force development efforts
62
Success = OCS fully operationalized across USPACOM
UNCLASS
OMI Demo ICW OCSJX-15 Will:
• Improve the acquisition and non-acquisition workforce training and experience
• Aid in USPACOM’s effort to operationalize OCS
• Transition idea of the OCS OMI to an enabling capability
• Address OCS capability gaps to plan and integrate OCS into operations
• Exercise key aspects of an OCS Mission Integrator as part of the OCSJX-15 in a USPACOM scenario
OCS OMI Demo and OCSJX-15
63As of 231400 Aug 14
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14 64
PROGRAM MANAGER Education: M.S., M.A., or MBA degree. Basic Experience: Typically has more than 10 years of experience in managing large, complex multi-disciplinary projects in a task order environment.
SENIOR LOGISTICS STRATEGIST Education: M.S., M.A., or MBA degree. General Experience: Typically has 13 or more years of experience in providing strategic planning across various functional areas for the Federal Government. Prefer SAMS, JAWS, SAASS, or SAW graduate.
JUNIOR LOGISTICS STRATEGIST Education: B.A., B.S. or M.S., M.A., MBA degree General Experience: Typically has 8 or more years of experience in logistics and supply chain management. If candidate has B.A. or B.S. degree, 12 years direct experience in the logistics field is desired with 6 years’ experience planning for major plans or orders.
SENIOR ACQUISITION SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT Education: B.A. or B.S. degree. General Experience: 12 or more years of experience in the field of acquisition.
JUNIOR ACQUISITION SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT Education: B.A. or B.S. degree. General Experience: 8 or more years of experience in the field of acquisition.
SENIOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST Education: A bachelor's or postgraduate degree General Experience: 6 years of experience performing the foregoing functions. At least 3 years of the foregoing total experience shall have been as a team leader or supervisor.
OMI KTR Positions
UNCLASS
As of 231400 Aug 14 65
PROJECT MANAGER Education: M.S., M.A., or MBA degree. A Project Manager requires a Master’s degree in a technical or management discipline with 12 years’ experience (OR a Bachelor’s degree in a technical or management discipline with 14 years’ experience OR 18 years’ experience with no degree) to include managing or supervising multiple small to medium sized complex projects.
PLANNING SUPPORT SENIOR SPECIALIST Education: M.S., M.A., or MBA degree. A Senior Specialist requires a Master’s degree from an accredited college or university and a minimum of 10 years related experience in contingency contracting or in joint planning OR a bachelor's degree and a minimum of 15 years related Operational Contract Support (OCS) experience in contingency contracting or joint planning and execution as well as Logistic Services experience.
TRAINING SUPPORT SENIOR SPECIALISTEducation: B.A., B.S. or M.S., M.A., MBA degree A Senior Specialist requires a Master’s degree from an accredited college or university and a minimum of 10 years related experience in contingency contracting or in joint planning OR a bachelor's degree and a minimum of 15 years related Operational Contract Support (OCS) experience in contingency contracting or joint planning and execution as well as Logistic Services experience.
OMI INTEGRATION AND TRANSFORMATION SENIOR SPECIALISTEducation: M.S., M.A., or MBA degree . A Senior Specialist requires a Master’s degree from an accredited college or university and a minimum of 10 years related experience in contingency contracting or in joint planning OR a bachelor's degree and a minimum of 15 years related Operational Contract Support (OCS) experience in contingency contracting or joint planning and execution as well as Logistic Services experience. Knowledge and experience in joint concept development and transition implementation planning and execution is desirable.
OMI JS J4 Positions
UNCLASS
Revised OCS Joint Concept POAM FY 12Key Events
• Oct 2011 Staff TOR to establish COI; Draft BAR (v.1); Establish Writing Team;
• Nov Writing Workshop 1; Distro BAR (v.1), JROCM 148-11 OCS Planners Conf
• Dec Prospectus Refinement, Central Idea Development, BAR (v.2)
• Jan 2012 Interview & Roundtable Plan, Staff BAR v.2, Start Central Idea Development
• Feb Adjudicate CRM BAR v.2, DJ4 AZ Check, Workshop 2 (Outline v0.1), JS J7 JCW ` Coordination, Prep BAR v.3
• Mar SME Coord, OCS LDRS Conf; Solutions development, Distro BAR v.3
Key Events• APR SME interviews, Concept Outline v0.2, BAR &
Central Idea Conf
• May SME Interviews, Draft experimentation design and analytical framework
• Jun Exp. Design & Analytical framework; Scenario(s) Development, Data collection and analysis plan, Traceability Matrix, IPC Event 1, Workshop 3
• Jul MPC Event 1, Workshop 4, Draft v0.2
• Aug FPC Event 1, Socialize Concept
• Sep Event 1, Red Team Prep, Event 1 Analysis, Concept revision (v0.3)
OCT NOV
Initial Concept Development – v0.1 v0.3
DEC JAN FEB MAR APR JUNMAY JUL
Event 1 IPC
AUG
BAR & Central
Idea Conf
TOR
SEP
Event 1 MPC
BAR v.2
ConceptOutline
WS 3
SME Interview Plan
WS 4
66
* Experiment and analytical framework lines of effort estimate; currently not yet resourced
As of 231400 Aug 14
Prospectus v0.2
BAR v.3
Conduct Interviews
Central & Support Ideas
Experiment Design & Analytical Framework
Event 1 FPC
Event 1
OCS Conf
OCS Conf
Socialize Concept
WS 2
Coord. Interviews
Roundtable
WS 1
Prospectus Refine
JROCM148-11
BAR v.1
Completed Working
Event 1 Analysis
Concept Revision
UNCLASS
Revised OCS Joint Concept POAM FY 13Key Events
• Oct 2012 RED Team, Revise v.3, Revise Exp & Analytical Framework, Experiment Scenario(s) Development, Transition Implementation Plan (TIP),
• Nov Event 2 Conf, LOG FCB Brief, Informal v.4 staffing
• Dec Event 2 FPC, CBA Study Plan
•Jan 2013 Event 2, Analysis, Experiment Quick Look
•Feb Experiment Report, Prep v0.5 for JSAP
•Mar JSAP v0.5 and CRM adjudications
• Apr JSAP v0.7 and CRM adjudications
• May Final CRM Conference
• Jun JCB Brief, OPS DEP Brief v0.9
• Jul Tank Brief
• Aug CJCS Decision
• Sep Archive, Transition
NOV
V0.5
DEC JAN FEB MAR APR JUNMAY JUL AUG SEP
As of 231400 Aug 14
V0.4
Log FCB IPR
JCB ApprovalJSAP
Staffing (v.0.5)
Sr LdrForum
JSAP Staffing (v.0.7)
Final CRM Conf
TankBrief
Event 2 PC
Event 2 FPC
Event 2
CBA Study Plan
Exp. Report
OPS DEPBrief
CJCS Decision
Archive
Transition
V0.7 v 1.0V0.9
67
OCT
Red Team 1
Revise Experiment
Design & Analytical
Framework
v0.3
Completed Working * Experiment and analytical framework lines of effort estimate; currently not yet resourced
Transition Plan