ultra-peripheral collisions at star

19
Erice, October 2 001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 1 Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR Pablo Yepes, Rice University for the Collaboration S T A R Workshop on Electromagnetic Probes of Fundamental Physics Erice (Sicily) Oct 16-21, 2001

Upload: jerica

Post on 17-Jan-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

S T A R. Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR. Pablo Yepes, Rice University for the Collaboration. Workshop on Electromagnetic Probes of Fundamental Physics Erice (Sicily) Oct 16-21, 2001. Ultra-Peripheral Collisions (UPC). Au. g , P, or meson. Au. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 1

Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Pablo Yepes, Rice University

for the CollaborationS T A R

Workshop on Electromagnetic Probes of Fundamental

Physics Erice (Sicily) Oct 16-21, 2001

Page 2: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 2

Page 3: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 3

Ultra-Peripheral Collisions (UPC)

• Nuclei “miss” each other (b > 2RA) No hadronic interactions

• Ions are sources of fields Photons: ~ Z2 very high fluxes Pomerons: A 2 (bulk)- A 4/3 (surface)

• Fields couple coherently to ions P < h/RA, ~30 MeV/c for heavy ions

P|| < h/RA ~ 3 GeV/c at RHIC

Au

Au

Coupling ~ nuclear form factor

, P, or meson

(Au Au, 200GeV/nucleon,

University of Frankfurt)

time

Page 4: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 4

•It is thought to factorize as function of impact parameter

•Decay yields neutrons at zero degrees wrt beam direction (ZDC)

In addition to UPC production, nuclei can exchange one or more separate photons and become mutually excited.

Nuclear Excitation

Au

Au

PAu*+n

Au*+n

Process

Au+Au -> Au*+Au* +UPC

Page 5: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 5

• Vector mesons: A , , , J/,… Very large cross sections. Can we address physics

of meson factories? Production cross sections --> (VN) Vector meson spectroscopy (, , ,…) Wave function collapse

• EM particle production: e+e-,,mesons Strong Field QED: Z ~ 0.6 meson spectroscopy

~ charge content of scalar/tensor mesons particles without charge (glueballs) won’t be

seen• Mutual Coulomb excitation (GDR & higher)

Luminosity measurement, impact parameter tag

Some Physics Topics

Production occurs in/near one ion

VM

e+e-, qq,...s

Z ~ 0.6; is N > 1?

Page 6: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 6

Page 7: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 7

A typical STAR events=200 GeV/A

Page 8: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 8

Year 2000 Samples

• Data: 400 K Minimum Bias:

Ntracks<10 (Signal in both ZDC’s)

7 h dedicated run with special trigger

• Monte Carlo: 100 K: 100 K di-electrons

Level 0 Trigger with Central Trigger Barrel:

•Top-Bottom Veto•1-2 hit North and 1-2 South•Output 20-40 Hz

Level 3 Trigger:•Vertex and Multiplicity•Output: 1-2 Hz

Page 9: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 9

Analysis Selection

Minbias • 2 +/- Primary Tracks• rvert< 15 cm, |zvert|<200 cm• Transverse Angle > 2.7 rad• Total pT<0.2 GeV

TriggeredAs Minbias plus anti-cosmic cut:

Opening Angle < 3 rad.Backgrounds:

incoherent photonuclear interactions grazing nuclear collisions beam gas

Page 10: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 10

pT and y Acceptance and Efficiency

From MC sample

|y|<1

Page 11: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 11

Opening Angle in Transverse Plane

Minbias Triggered

Cut Cut

Trigger simulationapplied to MC!

MC normalizedto data

MC normalizedto data

Page 12: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 12

Theta* with Pion Mass Assumption

Minbias Triggered

Theta*: decay angle relative to beam axis in center of mass mother

Trigger simulationapplied to MC!

MC normalizedto data

MC normalizedto data

Page 13: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 13

Triggered Sample• Track dE/dx consistent with • Sample divided:

No signal in ZDC: No nuclear breakup

Signal in ZDC: Nuclear breakup• peak for pT < 2h/ ~ 100 MeV/c

0 PT

M()

Preliminary

Preliminary

Page 14: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 14

‘Minimum Bias’ PT

0 PT

Preliminary

Page 15: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 15

Direct + - production

• Direct + - is independent of energy• The two processes interfere: 1800 phase change at

M(0) changes + - lineshape

• good data for p --> p (HERA + fixed target)• poor data for A

+ - fraction should decrease as A rises

-

+

-

A -- > 0A -- > + - A

+

A -- > + - A

0

Page 16: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 16

0 lineshape

ZEUS p --> (0 + +- )p

Set =0 for STAR

STAR Au --> (0 + +- )Au

Preliminary

Page 17: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 17

A Look at e+e-

• ‘Minimum bias data set 2 track Q=0 vertex

• Find electrons by dE/dx p< 140 MeV/c

• Select identified pairs

• pT peaked at 1/<b>

e

Blue - all particlesred - e+ e- pairs

Preliminary

Pt (GeVc)

P (GeV/c)

dE/d

x (k

eV/c

m)

Eve

nts

Page 18: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 18

Present and Future: 2001 Run

• Around 10 times more minbias events

• Dedicated trigger for UPC running in parallel for the last part of the run

TriggeredMinbias Very Preliminary

Page 19: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

Erice, October 2001 Pablo Yepes, Rice U. 19

Conclusions

• For the first time, we have observed three peripheral collisions processes Au + Au -- > Au + Au + 0

Au + Au -- > Au* + Au* + 0

Au + Au -- > Au* + Au* + e+e-

• We see interference between 0 and direct

• In 2001: more data, more triggers, more luminosity,more energy, more channels, more acceptance.