ultra-high-intensity laser-plasma interactions: comparing experimental results with three-...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
221 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three-Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations
Donald Umstadter
Scott Sepke
![Page 2: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Linear opticsX-ray tube
Nonlinear optics (bound electrons)
Chirped-pulse Amplification(1988)
Relativistic nonlinear optics (free electrons)
Laser (1960)
1018
103
11900 2000
Pea
k In
tens
ity (
Wat
ts/c
m2)
20 0/eEr e r
2eeE m c
2peE m c
Mode-locking
Relativistic protons1024
“Moore’s Law” for Peak Laser Intensity
![Page 3: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Intense optical laser light can generate radiation across the entire spectrum
Characteristics Femtosecond Tunable Collimated Synchronized Bench-top Bright Micron source
Type THz Infrared X-rays Electrons Positrons Protons Neutrons
Applications• Non-destructive
testing• Radiography• Lithography• Micro-machining• Ultrafast reactions• Metrology
![Page 4: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Relativistic self-channeling leads to collimation of the laser beam, which leads to collimation of the electrons.
Beam divergence found to be reduced with increasing laser intensity
Plaser =30 TW
E = 180 MeV
= 1010 e-
laser= 30 fs ~ 0.25o
LANEX
laser= 400 fs = 1°
![Page 5: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Laser wakefield plasma waves can accelerate electons to energy 100 MeV in a single millimeter
0t
F ~I
2 / pt l
Emax at t~p
![Page 6: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
“Monoenergetic” electrons with energy exceeding 150 MeV
•J. Faure et al., Nature 431, 541 (2004) •C.G. R. Geddes et al., Nature 431, 538 (2004)•S.P.D Mangles et al., Nature 431, 535 (2004)
PIC code prediction
experimental result
![Page 7: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Particle-in-Cell Laser-Plasma Simulations
An exact field and particle motion solver.
Maxwell’sEquations
Equationof Motion
E,B Fields(, J)
• LSP is a hybrid fluid/particle-in-cell code:¤ Models include plasmas, lasers, ionization, particle beams, QMD equations of state, TE and TM modes…¤ Allows migration between fluid and kinetic solvers.¤ Uses explicit and stable implicit particle and field solvers.
![Page 8: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
LSP Particle-in-Cell Simulations
256 2.2 GHz Opteron (64-bit) processors128 nodes each containing 4 GB of RAM
PrairieFire Beowulf Cluster•Fully relativistic 1,2,3D Cartesian and cylindrical geometry
•Self-consistent laser-plasma interactions
Plasma wave
30fs laser pulseSelf-injected electrons
Plasma “bubble”
Average Velocity Longitudinal Electric Field
![Page 9: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Pea
k P
ower
Rat
e (
PW
-Hz)
1
30-fs pulse duration
3-J energy per pulse
100-TW peak power
10-Hz repetition rate
UNL soon to have a laser with peak power-rate of 1 PW-Hz, highest of any in the US
![Page 10: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Diffraction limited laser focusing requires exact-field solutions
• Electron deflection experiment/simulations show that accurate laser fields are essential.
• We have derived exact solutions for arbitrary, focused Gaussian and super-Gaussian laser profiles.
• These models are complex and must be solved numerically.xEzE
yE
xE zEyE
![Page 11: Ultra-High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interactions: Comparing Experimental Results with Three- Dimensional,Fully-Relativistic, Numerical Simultations Donald](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d615503460f94a425ab/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Concluding Remarks
High-intensity laser-plasma interactions (including laser accelerators) is one of few physical systems in plasma physics (which is a many-many-body problem) that can be numerically modeled with reasonable accuracy.
The computing power required for 3-D modeling was reached only in the last decade.
The availability of greater computing power will enable simulations with larger domains and longer durations, which can more accurately model larger interaction regions and higher plasma densities.
The simultaneous rapid increases in laser and computer power are good example of technological convergence.