uk centre for the understanding of sustainable...
TRANSCRIPT
UK Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity (CUSP)
A system dynamics model
Prof Aled Jones* & Roberto Pasqualino*[email protected]; [email protected]
Agenda
• Introduction to CUSP
• SD approaches & CUSP
• Next steps
210/04/2017
In search of Sustainable Prosperity
A prosperous society is concerned not only with income and financial wealth, but also with the health and wellbeing of its citizens, with their access to good quality education, and with their prospects for decent and rewarding work. Prosperity enables basic individual rights and freedoms. But it must also deliver the ability for people to participate meaningfully in commons projects. Ultimately, prosperity must offer society a credible and inclusive vision of social progress.
Prof. Tim Jackson, Director of CUSP
CUSP partners
The research programme of CUSP is coordinated from the University of Surrey under the direction of Professor Tim Jackson.
CUSP’s academic partners include: University of Surrey, Anglia Ruskin University, Keele University, Goldsmiths College London, University of Leeds, Middlesex University, York University (Canada), University of Canterbury (New Zealand).
CUSP research themes:Meaning and Moral Framing of the Good Life
Arts and Culture in developing visions of prosperity
Political and Organisational dimensions of sustainable prosperity
Social and psychological understandings of the good life
Systems Analysis: Narratives of sustainable prosperity
Bottom up Systems Analysis
See also http://www.prosperitas.org.uk
Macroeconomic modelling project - Tim Jackson and Peter Victor
PASSAGE project supported by ESRC
System dynamics model of Financial Assets and Liabilities in a Stock-Flow consistent Framework (FALSTAFF)
Four-sector, demand-driven model of Savings, Inequality and Growth in a MAcroeconomic framework (SIGMA)
Blog: Prosperity and Sustainability in the Green Economy http://www.prosperitas.org.uk/blog.html#.VvKCEMfC6FI
Top down Systems Analysis
Building a global systems dynamic model incorporate finance and short term behaviours
Prof Forrester’s thoughts on the System Dynamics National Model
• Forrester (1980):
• “When fully assembled, the National Model will include 15 production sectors, such as consumer durables, manufacture of capital equipment, agriculture, housing, construction, services, and energy”
• Forrester (2003):
• “The system dynamics economic model has been developed over several decades. Initially it was to have been much larger than the current simplified model, which now has somewhat over 200 levels and 1400 auxiliary equations.”
• “Some people have questioned the need for such a large and complex model. Indeed, many applications in education and in policy design might be better handled with a collection of far simpler models. But I have felt that it is important to have a model in which the major modes of economic behaviours exist simultaneously for examining how the different modes may interact. … After the larger system is understood, it will be desirable to revert to much simpler special purpose models”
Research context
Our financial and economic system is exposed to catastrophic risks
from climate change and resource scarcity that it is unable to address
in its current form.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600 Maize, $/mt, real2010$
Wheat, Average,$/mtv, real 2010$
Rice, average ($/mt)
Average
Cereals, Global price, real 2010$
02468
101214161820 Oil price
Gas Price
Coal Price
Fossil fuels , Global price, 2010$
1. We live in a finite planet (Rockstrom
et al. 2009, Limits to Growth, 1972)
2. Resources getting scarcer as
environmental depletion, population,
urbanization increase (Jones et al.,
2013)
3. Implications for food security
threatened by climate change risk
(IPCC, 2013)
Where do we stand in 2015 according to Limits to Growth?
(Pasqualino et. Al 2015)
1972 20031991
• Lower productivity of the Industrial
sector shows the concern of human
society in coping with global
constraints
• Higher productivity of the Service
sector shows the focus of human
society to follow a different paradigm
of growth
• Higher food production due to
technology improvements and
Lower impact of food production to
Land Erosion due to good practice in
land use
Gap in the literature
(1971, 1972) Forrester, Meadows et al. World dynamics and Limits to Growth
(1976) Forrester’s System dynamics national model (SDNM)
Senge - 1978 comparison of investment function of SDNM with economic theory
Sterman - 1981 application of SDNM framework to Energy transition (conventional to unconventional) and the economy in the US 1980s
(2014-2016) Pasqualino update and application of such a framework to food and energy system modelling
SDNM – Includes:
• production sectors
• labor and professional mobility
• demographic sector and consumption
sectors
• commercial banking to make short-
term loans
• a monetary authority with its controls
over money and credit
• government services
• foreign sector
Global Economy
Energy supply
Manufacturing
Goods and
Services
Food and
Biofuels
Fossil Fuels
Renewable
Energy
Households
Banks
Public Sector
A model to evaluate the systemic risk
generated by food and energy supply trends
and shocks and their interactions with the
material and financial economies, in the short
term and under the constraints of a finite
planet.
Two closed system economy models
1210/04/2017
Global Economy
Energy supply
Manufacturing
Goods and
Services
Food and
Biofuels
Fossil Fuels
Renewable
Energy
Households
Banks
Public Sector
Large size model
• 240 stocks, 2500 auxiliaries, 600
parameters
• Out of equilibrium based on natural
resources depletion, labour
productivity change, population
growth
Medium size model
• 60 stocks, 650 auxiliaries, 200
parameters
• Simplified version to study
inequality, and test consumption
change patterns, productivity
growth
Closed system Generic economy
Banks
Public Sector
Households
Firms
Sensitivity analysis of shock scenarios
1310/04/2017
06 Sen 00106 Run 00306 Rin 00306 Run 00150.0% 75.0% 95.0% 100.0%
n price of output
7.0e-6
5.3e-6
3.5e-6
1.8e-6
01990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Time (Year)
06 Sen 00106 Run 00306 Rin 00306 Run 00150.0% 75.0% 95.0% 100.0%
f price of output
600
450
300
150
01990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Time (Year)
A double top-down approach
1410/04/2017
Global Economy
Energy supply
Manufacturing
Goods and
Services
Food and
Biofuels
Fossil Fuels
Renewable
Energy
Households
Banks
Public Sector
Global Economy
Energy supply
Manufacturing
Goods and
Services
Food and
Biofuels
Fossil Fuels
Renewable
Energy
Households
Banks
Public Sector
Global Economy
Energy supply
Manufacturing
Goods and
Services
Food and
Biofuels
Fossil Fuels
Renewable
Energy
Households
Banks
Public Sector
Global Economy
Energy supply
Manufacturing
Goods and
Services
Food and
Biofuels
Fossil Fuels
Renewable
Energy
Households
Banks
Public Sector
Global Economy
Energy supply
Manufacturing
Goods and
Services
Food and
Biofuels
Fossil Fuels
Renewable
Energy
Households
Banks
Public Sector
Global Economy
Energy supply
Manufacturing
Goods and
Services
Food and
Biofuels
Fossil Fuels
Renewable
Energy
Households
Banks
Public Sector
Global Economy
Energy supply
Manufacturing
Goods and
Services
Food and
Biofuels
Fossil Fuels
Renewable
Energy
Households
Banks
Public Sector
Global Economy
Energy supply
Manufacturing
Goods and
Services
Food and
Biofuels
Fossil Fuels
Renewable
Energy
Households
Banks
Public Sector
Towards a Hybrid SD-ABM model:• Current model as framework for a
generic macro-region splitting the world according to Currency/trade unions/…
• Modelling of foreign markets• Look at trade of labour, food, energy,
debt as connections among sectors • Focus on analysis and relative
parameterization among different regions
Updated version of the Limits to Growth with a team of 25 scientists• Based on LtG, proposal of a new simple
model of the global economy (As Simple As Possible)
• Focus on Narratives and Prosperity • APPG on LtG• Focus on the CUSP of the Global
Economy, Climate change, Consumption patterns, Restructuring of the economy, Risk in Finance, New set of Indicators, Planetary Boundaries…
1900 1950 2000 2050 21000
1
1
1 1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
34 4
4
4
5
5
5 5
Year
5: Nonrenewable resources
3: Industrial output
4: Pollution level
2: Foodoutput
1: Population
?
15
• A “positive” critique on LtG and current global economic
framework will be available at:
• Pasqualino R. and Jones A. – “Resources, Financial
Risk, and Dynamics of Growth”, Routledge publisher
- TBP in 2017
• Regionalization of the global model and move towards a
hybrid System Dynamics-Agent Based model.
• Update on “simple” Limits To Growth model and focus on
communication and narratives based on key scenarios
• Focus the model on inequality, prosperity, happiness
Summary
16
Global Sustainability Institute, Anglia Ruskin Univertisy, Cambridge, UK