ÙÌ Ç ÙÌ ³è ëÑ ØáæÈ - lgchem chemwide · 2015-06-09 · pipeÍ profile, film casting,...

9
[email protected] 01 Introduction LG POLYMER JOURNAL | 2015 SPRING. 2 (a) LLDPE, string extrusion 1 (b) LLDPE, string extrusion 2 (c) EVA/LLDPE compound, cable sheath extrusion 3 (d) mLLDPE, string extrusion 4 (e) metallocene based polyolefin elastomer resin, string extrusion 5 (f) partially foamed polymer melt, string extrusion 6 (g) regranulated LDPE, film blowing 7 (h) unfilled HDPE, string extrusion 8

Upload: vophuc

Post on 10-Jun-2019

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

. . . .? [email protected]

01 Introduction

.

,

.

() ,

.

, (Die Drool

Phenomenon) . ,

(Drool) .

116 .

Pipe profile, film casting, fiber spinning,

film/melt blowing, wire/cable sheathing

.

,

LG PO

LYMER

JOU

RN

AL | 2015 SPRIN

G.

2

1 | Examples of die drool Phenomenon16

(a) LLDPE, string extrusion1

(b) LLDPE, string extrusion2

(c) EVA/LLDPE compound, cable sheath extrusion3

(d) mLLDPE, string extrusion4

(e) metallocene based polyolefin elastomer resin, string extrusion5

(f) partially foamed polymer melt, string extrusion6

(g) regranulated LDPE, film blowing7

(h) unfilled HDPE, string extrusion8

.

, 1946

.

,

, ,

.

,

16.

,

.

02 Die Drool Formation Mechanism

,

,

.

9,

10,

.

1981 Klein 12

. Klein

,

,

,

.

,

,

13,14. Chaloupkova Zatloukal

LG PO

LYMER

JOU

RN

AL | 2015 SPRIN

G.

3

. . . .?

.

Suction.

Suction

4,15( 2).

.5

18,19 HDPE

. , HDPE

-

- slip-stick

(

)

, HDPE

,

. ,

20.(3)

,

.

,

.

. ,

, /

,

.

(solid metal die wall, liquid

polymer melt, and air)

.

driving force.

, /

,

. ,

2.

,

LG PO

LYMER

JOU

RN

AL | 2015 SPRIN

G.

4

2 | The predicted pressure field at the die exitfor the extrusion of mLLDPE.15

0.

,

(

0 -negative pressure)

.

.

,

driving force

suction.

,

. -

16.

,

driving force

.

wall slip.

wall slip

. 10-12,14

Wall slip

, -

.

, .

,

,

.

.

slip

.

no-slip condition

. 15,16

.

.

, wall slip

16.

- Flow-Induced Molecular Weight

Fractionation Theory

- Stress-Induced Cohesive Chains

Disentanglement Theory

LG PO

LYMER

JOU

RN

AL | 2015 SPRIN

G.

5

3 | Separation of slip layer and polymer bulk dueto cohesive failure inside flowing polymermelt inside circular die with no adhesive slip

. . . .?

03 Die Drool Causes and EliminationMethod

, 1

/

. 1

,

.

04 Effect of Die Design on Die DroolPhenomenon

60,

.

.

, ,

16. ,

/

.

.

.

.

.

[ Low Surface Energy Die Materials ]

2,17,21-23. ,

polytetrafluoroethylene

(PTFE)21PTFE22

. PTFE

.

.

0.8

,

23.

LG PO

LYMER

JOU

RN

AL | 2015 SPRIN

G.

6

,

. , , , PTFE,

10,

2.

[ Die Design Changes ]

, Foster

4 anti-drool

24.

frusto-conical

.

.

15 5(c)

champering .

45 champering ,

6

. 6 (Die drool

amount, DDA).

AD

, ADie

. tD ,

tDie.

( - -

) .

5(b) Flared

25-27.

flared

flared .

HDPE

flared champering

19.

,

(champering and flared shape)

LG PO

LYMER

JOU

RN

AL | 2015 SPRIN

G.

7

4 | Original (left) and modified (right) die exitsurface according24

5 | Detail description of the removable capillary15

drool

conductor

plasticcovering

harmlessdrips

Cooling medium channel

DDA = AD

ADie

tD

tDie

. . . .?

.

flared champering

(same

conclusion was found in reference27 for

mLLDPE material), HDPE

15 flared

capillary 2/15

.(7) , ,

56%,

97%15.

LG PO

LYMER

JOU

RN

AL | 2015 SPRIN

G.

8

6 | Dependence of the die drool amountproduced by mLLDPE extrusion on the dieexit angle (processing conditions: 400 g.hr-1, 85C, Die No. 1 - straight die, Die No. 5 -15chamfered die, Die No. 4 - 45chamfereddie)15

7 | Dimensionless build-up ratio as the functionof dimensionless flared length (processingconditions : 750 g.hr-1, 160C). LC1 is flaredlength and L is capillary length. Error barsrepresent three independent measurements19

0

1

2

3

4

5

10 20 30 40 50

Die

Droo

l Am

ount

DDA

(-)

Die No.1

Die No.5 Die No.40

1x10-4

3x10-4

2x10-4

4x10-4

6x10-4

5x10-4

7x10-4

1/15 2/15 3/15 4/15 5/15 6/15 7/15 8/15

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uild

up ra

tio, B

R (-)

Dimensionless flared length, LC1/L (-)Die exit angle ()

LG PO

LYMER

JOU

RN

AL | 2015 SPRIN

G.

9

05 Conclusion

,

.

,

.

1 | Summary of factors inducing formation of die drool16

Method Factors inducing die drool

Die design abrupt corners at die lips

dead corners inside extrusion die (thermal degradation)

high surface energy die wall materials

high surface roughness

short die land length

Polymer material low molecular weight fractions

multimodal polymers (low molecular weight tail)

high elasticity of polymer

linear architecture of macromolecules

high content of fillers

high concentration/incompatible additives or pigments

high concentration of volatiles

dissimilar material properties in blends

high content of stearates, ester lubricants, extending oils or waxes

chemical reactions between polymer and metal barrel/screw/die (PVC or PVDC materials)

Processing high processing temperature (thermaldegradation)

draw down

intensive cooling of die exit

Other factors die swell

shark skin

wall slip

vortices (thermal degradation)

slip-stick

pressure fluctuations in screw

excessive screw/barrel wear

. . . .?LG

POLYM

ERJO

UR

NAL | 2015 SPR

ING

.

10

. . .

1. Chai, C. K.; Adams, G.; Frame, J. Polyethylene DieDeposit - Measurement, Formation Mechanism andRoutes to Reduction, Annual Technical Conference -ANTEC, Conference Proceedings, 2001, Vol. 1; pp401-405.

2. Kulikov, O.; Hornung, K. A simple way to suppresssurface defects in the processing of polyethylene, J.Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2004, 124, 103-114.

3. Hwang, S. J.; Nam, G. J. The Effect of Ingredients andProcessing Conditions on the Extrusion Processabilityof Halogen-free Flame Retardant Thermoplastics,Annual Technical Conference - ANTEC, ConferenceProceedings, 2005; Vol. 1, pp 192-196.

4. Chaloupkova, K.; Zatloukal, M. Theoretical andexperimental analysis of the die drool phenomenonfor metallocene LLDPE, Polym. Eng. Sci. 2007, 47,871-881.

5. Hogan, T. A.; Walia, P.; Dems, B. C. Investigation ofthe relationships between die build up and die swell,Polym. Eng. Sci. 2009, 49, 333-343.

6. Cunningham, T.; Perdikoulias, J. Stop die buildup,Plastics Technology 2009, 55, 33-34.

7. Brachet, P.; Hinrichsen, E. L.; Larsen, .; Bjrndal, L.K.; Brendyen, F.; Lia, T. The problem of die drool inthe extrusion of recycled polyethylene, Prog. RubberPlast. Recycl. Technol. 2009, 25, 199-211.

8. Musil, J.; Zatloukal, M. Investigation of Internal DieDrool Phenomenon for Different HDPEs, AIPConference Proceedings, 2009; Vol. 1152, pp 69-74.

9. Henning, G. E. Method of Making Plastic Articles, USPatent 2,960,482 (1960).

10. Budenbender, H. W. Extruder Core Tubes, US Patent3,151,357 (1964).

11. Loser, T. N.; Jones, T. Solid Lubricant for ReducingDie-plating and Die-drag during the Extrusion ofViscous Rubber and Elastomeric PlasticCompositions, US Patent 3,600,309, 1971.

12. Klein, I. Die drool: What causes it, how to avoid it,Plastics World 1981, 39, 112-113.

13. Gander, J. D.; Giacomin, A. J. Review of Die LipBuild-up in Plastics Extrusion, Annual TechnicalConference - ANTEC, Conference Proceedings 1996,1, 1113-1117.

14. Gander, J. D.; Giacomin, A. J. Review of die lipbuildup in plastics extrusion, Polym. Eng.Sci. 1997,37, 1113-1126.

15. Chaloupkova, K.; Zatloukal, M. Effect of die designon die drool phenomenon for metallocene basedLLDPE: Theoretical and experimental investigation, J.App. Polym. Sci. 2009, 111, 1728-1737.

16. Musil, J.; Zatloukal, M. Historical Review of Die DroolPhenomenon in Plastics Extrusion, Polymer Reviews,54:139-184, 2014

17. Berry, K. L.; Downing, J. R. Extrusion Apparatus, USPatent 2,403,476, 1946.

18. Musil, J.; Zatloukal, M. Experimental investigation offlow induced molecular weight fractionationphenomenon for two linear HDPE polymer meltshaving same Mn and Mw but different Mz and Mz+1average molecular weights, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012,81, 146-156.

19. Musil, J.; Zatloukal, M. Effect of die exit geometry oninternal die drool phenomenon during linear HDPEmelt extrusion, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 2013, 56, 667-673.

20. Schmalzer, A. M.; Giacomin, A. J. Die drool and diedrool theory, AIP Conference Proceedings 2013,1526, 35-46.

21. Honda, Y.; Komatsu, H.; Mihara, Y. Multi-layerExtrusion Die, US Patent 4,484,883, 1984.

22. Musil, J.;Zatloukal, M. Effect of processing conditionsand die design on die drool phenomenon for HDPEpolymer melt, Annual Technical Conference -ANTEC, Conference Proceedings 2011, 2, 1181-1185.

23. Kurtz, S. J.; Szaniszlo, S. R. Reduction in Die Drool inFilled Resins and Product Improvement, US Patent5,008,056, 1991.

24. Foster, A. G. Extruding Dies, US Patent 2,863,169,1958.

25. Ohhata, T.; Tasaki, H.; Yamaguchi, T.; Shiina, M.;Fukuda,M.; Ikeshita,H. Die Plate for Plastics Extruder,US Patent 5,417,907, 1995.

26. Rakestraw, J. A.; Waggoner, M. G. Polymer ExtrusionDie and Use Thereof, US Patent 5,458,836, 1995.

27. Ding, F.; Zhao, L.; Giacomin, A. J.; Gander, J. D.Flaring dies to suppress die drool, Polym. Eng. Sci.2000, 40, 2113-2123.