ui 429 environmental ethics cstl-cla.semo.edu/hill/ui429 h. hamner hill, philosophy and religion...
TRANSCRIPT
UI 429Environmental Ethics
cstl-cla.semo.edu/hill/ui429
H. Hamner Hill, Philosophy and Religion
Introduce Myself & the Course
Overview of Environmental Ethics and Ethical Theory
Topics of Discussion
Website: cstl-cla.semo.edu/hill/ui429
Nature and details of the course
Why we need a course in environmental ethics
Overview of Ethical Theory
Nature of the Course
This is a lecture/Discussion course. The emphasis is on discussion. That means that the students will bear most of the responsibility for keeping the class moving. Students MUST be prepared for class.
Cell Phones
Turn it off. We are in class, your call can wait. Do not text message during class.
Cell phones and class do not mix.
Read this column from the New York Times.
Expectations of Students
Students will be expected to:– 1) Attend class regularly.– 2) Participate in class discussions. – 3) Complete five (5) written case study reports. – 4) Prepare an individual, written research project. – 5) Complete a mid-term essay examination.– 6) Prepare and present a book summary on a book
about contemporary issues in environmental ethics.– 7) Complete a comprehensive final examination.– 8) Thou shalt not plagiarize!
Basis for Student GradesCompletion of all assignments is a necessary
condition for receiving a passing grade in the course. Those students entitled to a passing grade will be evaluated as follows.
20% will be based on the case studies.
40% will be based on the research project,
10% will be based on the mid-term examination.
10% will be based on the book summary.
20% will be based on the final examination.
Texts
VanDeVeer and Pierce, The Environmental Ethics & Policy Handbook, 3rd ed, Wadworth, 2012.
Why Do We Need a Course in Environmental Ethics?
Check the headlinesHydraulic fracturingMonsanto and PCB’sCorps of Engineers and the Missouri RiverEPA standards for arsenic in drinking waterGlobal Climate Change
Why Do We Need a Course in Environmental Ethics?
Technological Change Plus the Technological Imperative– If we can do something, then we should do it
Human impact on the environmentChanging Society– Views of the role of people in our environment– Changing values (religious, social)– Increased wealth
Formal Rules (EPA, RCRA, CERCLA)
Humanity’s Top Ten Problemsfor next 50 years
1. Population & Consumption
2. Energy3. Water4. Food5. Waste & Pollution 6. Poverty7. War8. Emerging Diseases9. Education10. Democracy 2004 6.5 Billion People
2013 >7 Billion People2050 ~ 10 Billion People
Overview of Ethical Theory
What is a Theory? Scientific theories:– Tool for describing our experience– Tool for predicting future experience– Tool for organizing our experiences
Good Theories Must:
Fit (generally) our experience
Be subject to test and refutation
Are Ethical Theories Really Theories?
What are the data in ethics?–Considered moral judgments
Can ethical theories be tested?–Test cases and moral senses
Components of an Ethical Theory
Theory of Value (Axiology)– Monistic (there is only one thing of value)– Pluralistic (several things have value)
Components of an Ethical Theory
Theory of Value (Axiology)
Theory of Obligation (Deontology)
Two Major Types of Theories of Obligation
Relativist
Non-relativist (absolutist)
Relativist Theories
There are no universal or objective standards of right and wrong, there are no universal duties. “Right” is a concept that makes sense only in a context; what is right is relative to a context.
Non-Relativist Theories
There are objective, universal standards of conduct that apply to all people in all settings.
Major Non-Relativist Theories of Obligation
Consequentialist
Duty Based
Rights Based
Natural Law
Virtue Ethics
Consequentialist Theories
The rightness or wrongness of an act is determined through reference to the consequences of the act. Right actions maximize value.
Duty Based Theories of Obligation
Human reason allows us to discover universal duties or obligations that ew have to one another.
Rights Based Theories of Obligation
People come equipped with a basic set of rights, respect for which is a defining feature of moral action. Right actions respect basic rights.
Natural Law
The Divine law sets the standard for all human laws. Humans are obligated to act in accordance with the Divine law, and all human laws should embody it.
Virtue Ethics
Act in ways that promote the development of and display virtuous character traits
Major Ethical Principles
Nonmaleficence
Beneficence
Utility
Distributive Justice
Autonomy
Precautionary Principle
Nonmaleficence
Act in ways that do not cause harm or needless suffering to others. This principle is a formalization of the "above all else, do no harm" edict.
Beneficence
Act in ways that promote the welfare of other people. This principle requires affirmative steps be taken to advance the welfare of others.
Utility
Act in ways that maximize good and minimize harm. Right actions maximize some measurable thing of value.
Distributive Justice
Act in way that promote a just* distribution of social goods. This theory needs an independent theory of just distribution to be workable.
Autonomy
Act in ways that allow rational individuals to govern their own lives. Treat persons with respect and dignity and allow them to make decisions for themselves with regard to their own lives.
The Precautionary Principle
Take precautionary measures to anticipate, prevent or minimize climate change and mitigate its adverse effects. Rather than await certainty, regulators should act in anticipation of any potential environmental harm in order to prevent it.
Roles, Responsibilities, Values and Conflicts
Social Roles and Institutions
Established and continuing parts in a social enterprise
Characterized by distinctive activity
Special contexts of evaluation and appropriateness
Contexts of Evaluation and Appropriateness
Prescribed means (constraints on reasons)
Constraints on actions
Prescribed ends
The Ecology of Social Roles
A role is shaped by the demands of complementary roles surrounding it, and roles change in response to changes in other interacting roles
Responsibilities and Values are Defined by Roles
Role Responsibilities
Expectations that are placed on an agent in virtue of that agent’s acting in a certain role capacity
Included and excluded reasons--agents acting in roles are expected to use, or exclude certain types of reasons
People Fill Several Roles Simultaneously
The fundamental values and responsibilities of different roles may come into open conflict
Inconsistent social messages about values
Three conflicting roles
Consumer
Citizen
Neighbor
Values Vary by Role
What is valued in one role may not be valued in, or may be harmful to, another
Inconsistent Social Messages About Values
Success: wealth and avarice
Work: virtue or punishment
Societal Values: liberty, justice, and equality
Land values: stewardship or dominion
Confusion between morality and legality
M.L. King on Morality and Legality
Morality cannot be legislated, but behavior can be regulated. We cannot change the heart, but we may restrain the heartless.
Law is External
Morality is Internal
Law is about what we MUST Do
Morality is about what we STRIVE to Do and Be
Ethics is about doing more than you are required to do, but less than you are allowed to do
Michael Josephson