u.d.c 624.07 $ ^ ö/¶ µ s g#Ý k s d7È s4 b ö&o$×%Ê'2 >+ ú · 9 ) Ý l … ·...

6
1) 2) 3) 4) 10 1929 5) 1 RC 14 6) 5 2005 2006 2012 S 2012 * 技術研究所 材料・構造グループ ** 管理本部 人事部 *** 国際事業部 プロジェクト統括部 U.D.C 624.07 異なる減衰機構を併用した制震構造の基礎的研究 -振動台実験結果及び地震応答解析による再現解析- 千葉 一樹 豊嶋  学 *  鈴木 敏志 *   三輪 晋也 ** 竹田 史朗 *** 53 東急建設技術研究所報No.39 東急建設技術研究所報No.39

Upload: others

Post on 28-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: U.D.C 624.07 $ ^ ö/¶ µ S G#Ý K S D7È S4 b ö&O$×%Ê'2 >+ ú · 9 ) Ý l … · 2020. 4. 23. · s4 g ' x>* v 7u _ 3q k z7u9× @9× c ^ ... 5 m5 1.14 k5 t1 0.56 k5 t2 0.56 k5

No.39

U.D.C 624.07

1)

2)

3)

4) 10

1929

5)

1

RC 14 6)

5 2005 20062012 S

2012

53

* 技術研究所 材料・構造グループ ** 管理本部 人事部 *** 国際事業部 プロジェクト統括部

U.D.C 624.07

異なる減衰機構を併用した制震構造の基礎的研究-振動台実験結果及び地震応答解析による再現解析-

千葉 一樹* 豊嶋  学 *  鈴木 敏志*  

三輪 晋也** 竹田 史朗***

53

東急建設技術研究所報No.39東急建設技術研究所報No.39

Page 2: U.D.C 624.07 $ ^ ö/¶ µ S G#Ý K S D7È S4 b ö&O$×%Ê'2 >+ ú · 9 ) Ý l … · 2020. 4. 23. · s4 g ' x>* v 7u _ 3q k z7u9× @9× c ^ ... 5 m5 1.14 k5 t1 0.56 k5 t2 0.56 k5

2

7)

1

2

HH-200x200x6x8 t=22

4.2m 6.6t6.0t 5 3

X 1

1 1Type1

1/2 Type2 1/3 Type31

5

Y X

4.2m1580

(mm)

1580

N

N

PPP

+ =

P P P

+ =

P P P

+ =

5 M5 1.14 K5T1 0.56 K5T2 0.56 K5T3 0.564 M4 1.23 K4T1 0.82 K4T2 0.83 K4T3 0.833 M3 1.23 K3T1 1.14 K3T2 1.14 K3T3 1.142 M2 1.23 K2T1 1.65 K2T2 1.66 K2T3 1.66

1.10 0.72(0.52 ) (0.34 )

K1T2 K1T31 M1 1.18 K1T1 2.13

Type1

(kN/mm)(t) (kN/mm) (kN/mm)

Type2 Type3

WFD1.5kN±30mm SD10kN-100

Type1

東急建設技術研究所報No.39

54

Page 3: U.D.C 624.07 $ ^ ö/¶ µ S G#Ý K S D7È S4 b ö&O$×%Ê'2 >+ ú · 9 ) Ý l … · 2020. 4. 23. · s4 g ' x>* v 7u _ 3q k z7u9× @9× c ^ ... 5 m5 1.14 k5 t1 0.56 k5 t2 0.56 k5

4 WFD1.5kN±30mm1.5kN ±30mm

5 SD10kN-1000.2kN/kine 30kine

6kN 2

1 3Type2 Type3 (a)

(b) (c) (d)4

ElCentroNS 1940 Imperial Valley

JMAkobeNS 1995ELNS KBNS

(100gal) X

1/100rad.10kine

7.5kine 5kine 2.5kine

2 (b) (d)

Type3-(d) ELNS2.5kine10kine 6

ELNS2.5kineELNS10kine

Type3 ELNS7.5kine7

(d) (b)

(d)

(a)(d) Type2 Type3

8 Type2Type3 3 4

Type3

WFD: SD sp1

( T1:Type1, T2:Type2, T3:Type3)

Type1

(a) 1.54 1.41 1.29(b) - 1.68 (b)/(a) 1.19 1.68 (b)/(a) 1.30(c) - 1.43 (c)/(a) 1.01 1.32 (c)/(a) 1.02(d) - 1.68 (d)/(a) 1.19 1.68 (d)/(a) 1.30

Type31 (Hz) Type2

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6

(kN

)

(mm)

Type3-(d) ELNS10kine

1story(WFD+SD+sp1)WFD+sp1SD+sp1

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6

(kN

)

(mm)

Type3-(d) ELNS2.5kine

1story(WFD+SD+sp1)WFD+sp1SD+sp1

0

1

2

3

4

5

0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015

(m)

(rad.)

(a) ELNS7.5kine

T1

T2

T3

1/200 1/100 1/75

0

1

2

3

4

5

0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020

(m)

(rad.)

Type3_ELNS7.5kine

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

1/200 1/100 1/75

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

(m)

(gal)

Type3_ELNS7.5kine

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

0

1

2

3

4

5

0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015

(m)

(rad.)

(d) ELNS7.5kine

T2

T3

1/200 1/100 1/750

1

2

3

4

5

0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015

(m)

(rad.)

(d) KBNS10kine

T2

T3

1/200 1/100 1/75

東急建設技術研究所報No.39

55

Page 4: U.D.C 624.07 $ ^ ö/¶ µ S G#Ý K S D7È S4 b ö&O$×%Ê'2 >+ ú · 9 ) Ý l … · 2020. 4. 23. · s4 g ' x>* v 7u _ 3q k z7u9× @9× c ^ ... 5 m5 1.14 k5 t1 0.56 k5 t2 0.56 k5

5 59

1

Rayleigh(100gal)

1 2 3

(CASE1)(CASE2)

(b)

WFDK1

WFDPy

10 4

1.5kN2

(1)CWFD

(2) 115

11

vCF WFDWFD (1)

)127.1(17.1 006.005.0 tWFD evF (2)

FWFD : (kN) CWFD :(kN/kine) v : (kine) :t : ( )

-5-4-3-2-1012345

-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

(kN

)

(mm)

WFD-E

(Type3-(b)_ELNS7.5kine)

-5-4-3-2-1012345

-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

(kN

)

(mm)

WFD-W

(Type3-(b)_ELNS7.5kine)

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(kN

)

(kine)

WFD-E

(t=20 )

F=2.3684 v0.1344

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(kN

)

(kine)

WFD-W

(t=20 )

F=1.2131 v0.1395

200

200

200

200

200

200

600

600

600

600

600

4200

1580(mm)

M5

M4

M3

M2

M1

K5

K4

K3

K2

K1

SD

WFD-E WFD-W SD

WFD-E WFD-W

v

F

C

v

F

F=Cv

F

v

F

C1

C2

h1T1 0.0091 h1T2 0.0077 h1T3 0.0087h2T1 0.0035 h2T2 0.0043 h2T3 0.0034

Type1 Type2 Type3

WFDK1e 660.3 WFDPye 2.694 e 0WFDK1w 258.8 WFDPyw 1.371 w 0

CASE1(kN/mm) (kN)

WFDCe 2.368 e 0.134WFDCw 1.213 w 0.139

(kN/kine)CASE2

東急建設技術研究所報No.39

56

Page 5: U.D.C 624.07 $ ^ ö/¶ µ S G#Ý K S D7È S4 b ö&O$×%Ê'2 >+ ú · 9 ) Ý l … · 2020. 4. 23. · s4 g ' x>* v 7u _ 3q k z7u9× @9× c ^ ... 5 m5 1.14 k5 t1 0.56 k5 t2 0.56 k5

0.2(kN/kine)

12

0.2(kN/kine)

(CASE1) SDF|SDF| 0.2kN

|SDF|>0.2kN 2(CASE2)

6

9CASE1 CASE2

Type3-(d) ELNS7.5kine

13 Exp. CASE1CASE2 Ana.C1 Ana.C2

CASE2

CASE214

RC S SRC

SDC1 SDPy SDC2

(kN/kine (kN) (kN/kine

CASE1 0.200 - - -

CASE2 0.649 0.146 0.228 0.142

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

(kN

)

(kine)

SD

(Type3-(c)_ELNS2.5kine)

K1=0.649

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

(kN

)

(kine)

SD

(Type3-(c)_ELNS7.5kine)

K1=0.649

K2=0.142

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

(kN

)

(mm)

Type3-(d)_ELNS7.5kine

Exp. Ana.C1 Ana.C2-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

(kN

)

(mm)

Type3-(d)_ELNS7.5kine

Exp. Ana.C1 Ana.C2

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 0.0025 0.005 0.0075 0.01

(m)

(rad.)

Type3_ELNS7.5kine

Exp.Ana.C1Ana.C2

1/500 1/200 1/150

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 100 200 300

(m)

(gal)

Type3_ELNS7.5kine

Exp.Ana.C1Ana.C2

東急建設技術研究所報No.39

57

Page 6: U.D.C 624.07 $ ^ ö/¶ µ S G#Ý K S D7È S4 b ö&O$×%Ê'2 >+ ú · 9 ) Ý l … · 2020. 4. 23. · s4 g ' x>* v 7u _ 3q k z7u9× @9× c ^ ... 5 m5 1.14 k5 t1 0.56 k5 t2 0.56 k5

1 B-2

pp.629-630 1996.9

2

B-2 pp.573-574 2010.9

3 1 2

C-1 pp.969-972 2000.9

4 8 10 1 3

B-2 pp.545-550 2008.9

5 pp.4-5 1988.5

6 2 RC

B-2 pp.699-700 2002.8

7 3 1 2

B-2 pp.877-880 2013.8

FUNDAMENTAL STUDY OF PASSIVE CONTROLLED STRUCTURE WITH DEFFERENT DAMPING MECHANISM

K.Chiba, M.Toyoshima, S.Suzuki S.Miwa and S.Takeda

By the passive controlled system which absorbs a part of earthquake energy input into a building, seismic loads which structures bear are reduced and the possibility of a structure design to be able to reduce earthquake resistant elements is expected. This paper presents the results of shaking table test for a frame model of steel with the passive controlled system and the results of reproduction analysis of the experiments by earthquake response analysis, for the purpose of validating the interaction effect of the passive controlled system that used a different damping device together and confirming the passive controlled effect that placed damping devices in the lower floor intensively. This study adopts the friction wall which has displacement dependence and the oil damper which has velocity dependence, as different passive controlled systems. The availability of the passive controlled system to be suggested in this paper is confirmed from the results of shaking table tests and reproduction analysis of experiments.

東急建設技術研究所報No.39

58