uav - lecture 10 zdobyslaw goraj
TRANSCRIPT
1
UAV - lecture 10 – Zdobyslaw Goraj
Selection of wing section, part 1
Warsaw, 14 May, 2020
2
HERON-TP
3
Malat’s Customers in Afghanistan
4
Selection of wing section • mission-tailored, customized wings –
wing section catalogue as NACA, Wortmanna, Eplera, GAWa
(and derivatives of LS type) are not very useful due to ranges of Re,
CL, Ma;
• interdisciplinary approach must be applied, taking into account many
disciplines as aerodynamics, wing structure (spar location and its
layout), fuel tank arrangement, aeroelasticity, servos locations etc. It is
closely related to so-called MDO (Multi – Disciplinary Optimisation);
• in design and analysis of to-day wing sections the programme MSES
by Mark Drela (MIT) is widely used. This software is based on Euler
equation combined with viscid Boundary Layer equation. In the
internet there is also available the XFOIL software – being an simpler
(linear) version of MSES.
5
Flight
endurance:
Endurance – general formula:
1
0ln1
W
W
D
L
cE
t
;
where:
pr
t
Vcc
;
whilst: c – specific fuel consumption of piston engine;
ct – – specific fuel consumption of turbine engine;
pr – propeller efficiency.
For aircraft with piston engine we have:
2/1
0
2/1
1
2/3
2
WWC
CS
cE
D
Lpr
For aircraft with turbine engine we have:
1
0ln1
W
W
D
L
cE
t
Endurance coefficient
efficiency
s
m
s
m
m
s
mkg
m
kgmunit
2
1:
mm
s
sC
sCunit t
11;
1:
6
HA-flight – region of development interests
high speed
airfoilshigh altitude
flight
historical
trend
low speed airfoilsRe
M
106 107
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
high speed
airfoilshigh altitude
flight
historical
trend
low speed airfoilsRe
M
106 107
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
manned unmanned
7
Wing sections for surveillance aircraft
of high CL and high CD (piston-prop)
)18.0(2
0 tcoefficienOswaldewhere
eA
CCC L
DD
8
Wing sections for
surveillance aircraft
of high CL and high
CD (turbo-prop)
AR – aspect ratio
e – Oswalda coefficient
200 cts CD0 = 0.0200
9
Two elements (slatted) airfoils: SA
Max.lift (F=0o)= 2.4
Stall characteristics: Mild stall
NLF technology: upper surface – 60% laminar
lower surface – 80% laminar
10
Influence of Re on airfoil characteristics (1/2)
11
Influence of Re on airfoil characteristics (2/2)
12
Endurance factor for different airfoils –
Wind Tunnel results
HQ – variable camber airfoil, for modern sailplane
wings featuring a plain trailing edge flap,
developed at DLR
13
Influence of bags on airfoil characteristics
14
Influence of flap deflection of airfoil characteristics
15
HERON with wing section SA-21
16
HERON – wing flaps (1/2)
17
HERON – wing flaps (2/2)
18
FIREBIRD with wing section SA-19
19
Wing section SA-19 – flaps configuration
suited to the mission segment
20
Two-element wing sections suited to high
altitude flights: HASA-LT i HASA-HT (1/2)
LOW TRANSONIC (HASA-LT)
propeller-driven aircraft
HIGH TRANSONIC (HASA-HT)
jet-powered aircraft
M = 0.30 - 0.50
high values of endurance factor
Clmax 2.0 - 2.5
M2Clmax = 0.4 - 0.5
maximum
lift
ceil ing
parameter
M = 0.50 - 0.70
high lift-to-drag ratio
Clmax 1.5
M2Clmax = 0.5 - 0.6
21
Two-element wing sections suited to high
altitude flights: HASA-LT i HASA-HT (2/2) High Altitude Slotted Airfoil
22
Liebeck’s & SA-14 wing sections (1/2)
23
Liebeck’s & SA-14 wing sections (2/2)
24
Aerodynamic
characteristics at
off-design point –
going down with the
Cl one can decrease
the Cd
Przy zmniejszeniu Cl możemy
też zmniejszyć Cd
25
Influence of Mach
number on endurance
coefficient
CL
26
High altitude
transonic airfoils
27
Influence of
Reynolds number
on drag polars for
high altitude
transonic airfoils
28
Influence of
Reynolds number
on aerodynamic
efficiency for high
altitude transonic
airfoils
29
Influence of Mach
number on ceiling
parameter for high
altitude transonic
airfoils
30
Hinge moments for
high altitude
transonic airfoils
31
Two-segment wing section & associated
pressure distribution
32
Influence of surface roughness & bugs
(insects) on aerodynamic characteristics
33
How wing thickness does change along
wing span on example of HERON
34
Wing section configuration best suited to the
mission segment
35
Extra space for fuel FT (Fuel Tank – Extended)
36
Wing section FT/EX – pressure distribution
& lift coefficient (Fuel Tank – Extended)
37
Endurance coefficient dependant on parasite
drag due to external containers
38
Altitude Factor:
M2 CL
pTR
pa
s
,
where: R = cp - cv – perfect gas constant (= 287 J/(kg K)); = 1,4 (raio
of specific heats)
From equilibrium of lift and weight one has:
LL CqS
QorazCSqQ
and hence
2
2222
2
2 2
2
1
2
1
aS
QCMorazaCMaC
a
V
S
QLLL
and
LLL CMpp
CMaCMS
Q 2222
2
1
2
1
2
1
or
LL CMSTRCMSpQ 22 )(2
1
2
1
From the above equation one can see that the higher
altitude (and lower pressure) the higher „altitude factor”
M2 CL
39
How one can improve the altitude factor: M2 CL
Altitude factor can be increased either due to:
1. Altitude increase (p will decrease and T*
decrease also)
2. Wing loading (Q/S) increase
40
Flight at high altitudes (1/2) Smaller S means higher W/S
at the same altitude
The bigger drag of external containers, the higher lift coefficient CL (at loiter)
S
Q
pCM L
122
41
Flight at high altitudes (2/2)
Smaller weight; V=constant;
Flight altitude increases
Smaller weight; smaller speed;
Flight altitude = constant Smaller Re; V=constant;
Flight altitude increases
Smaller Re; smaller speed;
Flight altitude = constant S
Q
pCM L
122