type 2 diabetes: how sweet it is! dr. jeremy gilbert division of endocrinology assistant professor...
TRANSCRIPT
Type 2 Diabetes: How sweet it is!
Dr. Jeremy Gilbert
Division of EndocrinologyAssistant ProfessorUniversity of Toronto
Faculty/Presenter Disclosure
• Faculty: Dr. Jeremy Gilbert• Program: 51st Annual Scientific Assembly• Relationships with commercial interests:
– Honoraria:– AstraZeneca– Bristol Meyers Squibb– Eli Lilly– Merck– Novonordisk– Sanofi
Disclosure of Commercial Support
• This program has received financial support n/a from in the form of n/a• This program has received in-kind support from n/a in the form of n/a
• Potential for conflict(s) of interest:– Dr. Jeremy GIlbert has received no payment from any organization supporting
this program AND/OR organization whose product(s) are being discussed in this program.
Mitigating Potential Bias
• All recommendations will be based on the Canadian Diabetes Association Guidelines and relevant medical literature.
OBJECTIVES
• 1. Review highlights from the 2013 Canadian Diabetes Association Guidelines including diagnostic criteria and treatment goals
• 2. Discuss anti-hyperglyemic agent options after Metformin, focussing on newer medication options
• 3. Explore the complications of Diabetes and examine vascular protective strategies in individuals with Diabetes
www.guidelines.diabetes.ca
How common is Diabetes?
Diabetes in Canada: Prevalence by Province and Territory
Public Health Agency of Canada. Diabetes in Canada: Facts and figures from a public health perspective. Ottawa, 2011.
NL6.5%
ON 6.0%
QC 5.1%
PE5.6%
NB5.9%
NS 6.1%
MB 5.9%
SK 5.4%
AB 4.9%
BC 5.4%
NT 5.5%
YT 5.4%
NU 4.4%
† Age-standardized to the 1991 Canadian population.
Age-standardized† prevalence of diagnosed DM among individuals ≥ 1 year, 2008/09
NL, NS and ON had the highest prevalence, while NU, AB and QC had the lowest.
< 5.0
5.0 < 5.5
5.5 < 6.0
6.0 < 6.5
≥ 6.5
Public Health Agency of Canada. Diabetes in Canada: Facts and figures from a public health perspective. Ottawa, 2011.
Prevalence of diagnosed diabetes among individuals aged ≥ 1 year, by age group and sex, 2008/09
Diabetes in Canada: Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes by age and sex
Prevalence increased with age. The sharpest increase occurred after age 40 years. The highest prevalence was in the 75-79 year age group.
Pre
va
len
ce
(%
)
0
10
15
25
30
1-19
5
20
20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 ≥85 CanadaAge group (years)
Females
Males
Total
Overall Prevalence
6.4%
7.2%
6.8%
Patients with DM are more likely to be hospitalized for many conditions
Public Health Agency of Canada (August 2011); using 2008/09 data from the Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System (Public Health Agency of Canada).
Diminishedinsulin
Hyperglycemia
Liver
1. Insulin deficiency
2. Excess glucose output 3. Insulin resistance
Pancreas
Muscle and fat
Excess glucagon
Islet
Diminishedinsulin
α-cell produces excess glucagon
β-cell produces less insulin
The pathophysiology of T2DM includes three main defects
Type 2 Diabetes is a Progressive Disease
• 50% of ß-cell function is already lost at diagnosis • ß-cell function will continue to decline despite treatment• Majority of patients will eventually require insulin therapy
Impairedglucosetolerance
100
75
50
25
Years from Diagnosis
Bet
a C
ell F
un
ctio
n (
%)
-12 -10 -6 -2 0 2 6 10 14
Postprandial hyperglycemia
Type 2 diabetes phase I Type 2
diabetes phase II
Type 2 diabetes phase III
Lebovitz HE. Diabetes Review 1999; 7(3):139-53.UKPDS Group. Diabetes 1995; 44:1249.
Stages of Type 2 diabetes in relationship to ß-cell function
β-ce
ll fu
nctio
n (%
)
Years
100
75
50
25
00 1 2 3 4 5 6
β-cell function declines, while . . .
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes. 1995;44:1249–1258.
Years0 1 2 3 4 5 6
9
10
8
7
6
5
HbA
1c
. . . hyperglycemiaincreases
Progressive impairment in β-cell functionDiet/conv Rx (n=376)Metformin (n=159)SU/intensive (n=511)
SU = sulfonylurea
Question• How often should should a FPG be done in
most individuals > 40 years of age:A) every yearB) every 2 yearsC) every 3 yearsD) every 4 yearsE) every 5 years
FPG ≥7.0 mmol/LFasting = no caloric intake for at least 8 hours
or
A1C ≥6.5% (in adults)Using a standardized, validated assay, in the absence of factors that affect the
accuracy of the A1C and not for suspected type 1 diabetesor
2hPG in a 75-g OGTT ≥11.1 mmol/Lor
Random PG ≥11.1 mmol/L Random= any time of the day, without regard to the interval since the last meal
2hPG = 2-hour plasma glucose; FPG = fasting plasma glucose; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; PG = plasma glucose
Diagnosis of Diabetes2013
Diagnosis of Prediabetes*Test Result Prediabetes Category
Fasting Plasma Glucose(mmol/L)
6.1 - 6.9
Impaired fasting glucose (IFG)
2-hr Plasma Glucose in a 75-g Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (mmol/L)
7.8 – 11.0 Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)
GlycatedHemoglobin(A1C) (%)
6.0 - 6.4 Prediabetes
* Prediabetes = IFG, IGT or A1C 6.0 - 6.4% high risk of developing T2DM
2013
Screening Checklist
ASSESS all adults clinically every year for risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM)
SCREEN every 3 years if ≥ 40 years or high risk on risk calculator
SCREEN earlier and more frequently if very high risk on risk calculator or additional risk factors present
USE fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and/or A1C as initial screening tests
A1C (%) mmol/L
12% ________________ 16.5
11% __________________14.9
10% _________________ 13.4
8% __________________10.1
7% ___________________ 8.6
6% ___________________
Glycated Hemoglobin (A1C) /Glucose
7.0
9% __________________11.8
Kollman (2008) Diabetes Care. 31:381-385
What is new in making the diagnosis of diabetes?
Individualizing A1C Targets
which must be balanced against the risk of hypoglycemia
Consider 7.1-8.5% if:
2013
Why ≤ 7%?Macro and Microvascular Benefits?
DCCTn=1441 T1DM
Intensive(≥ 3
injections/day or CSII)
vs Conventional (1-2 injections
per day)
Reduction in Retinopathy
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986.
Primary Prevention Secondary Intervention
76% RRR(95% CI 62-85%)
54% RRR(95% CI 39-
66%)
RRR = relative risk reduction CI = confidence interval
Solid line = risk of developing microalbuminuriaDashed line = risk of developing macroalbuminuria
DCCT: Reduction in Albuminuria
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986.
34% RRR (p<0.04)
43% RRR(p=0.001)
56% RRR(p=0.01)
Primary Prevention Secondary Intervention
guidelines.diabetes.ca | 1-800-BANTING (226-8464) | diabetes.caCopyright © 2013 Canadian Diabetes Association
RRR = relative risk reductionCI = confidence interval
Reduction in Neuropathy
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986.
UKPDS: N = 3867 T2DM
06
8
9
0 3 6 9 12 15
A1C
(%
)
Conventional7.9%
Intensive7.0%
7
UKPDS Study Group. Lancet 1998:352:837-53.
After median 8.5 years post-trial follow-upAggregate Endpoint 1997 2007Any diabetes related endpoint RRR: 12% 9%
P: 0.029 0.040
Microvascular disease RRR: 25% 24% P: 0.0099 0.001
Myocardial infarction RRR: 16% 15% P: 0.052 0.014
All-cause mortality RRR: 6% 13% P: 0.44 0.007
Legacy Effect of Earlier Glucose Control
Holman R, et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359.
Lifestyle Modification&
Medications for hyperglycemia How do we choose?
Macronutrient Distribution (% Total Energy)
Carbohydrates Protein Fat
% of total energy
45-60% 15-20%(or 1-1.5g / kg BW)
20-35%
Calories per gram
4 4 9
Grams for 2000 calorie/day diet
225-300 75-100 44-78
BW = body weight
Physical Activity Checklist
DO a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate-to vigorous-
intensity aerobic exercise per week
INCLUDE resistance exercise ≥ 2 times a week
SET physical activity goals and INVOLVE a multi-
disciplinary team
ASSESS patient’s health before prescribing an exercise
regimen
2013
Modest weight loss CAN make a difference
• Goal is to prevent weight gain, promote weight loss and prevent weight re-gain
• Weight loss of only 5-10% improves:– Insulin sensitivity – Glycemic control – Blood pressure– Lipid levels
It can be done!460 Pounds 256 Pounds
Pharmacotherapy in T2DM checklist
CHOOSE initial therapy based on degree of
hyperglycemia
START with Metformin +/- others
INDIVIDUALIZE your therapy choice based on
characteristics of the patient and the agent
REACH TARGET within 3-6 months of diagnosis
2013
Start metformin immediately
Consider initial combination with another antihyperglycemic agent
Start lifestyle intervention (nutrition therapy and physical activity) +/- Metformin
A1C <8.5%Symptomatic hyperglycemia with
metabolic decompensationA1C 8.5%
Initiate insulin +/-metformin
If not at glycemic target (2-3 mos)
Start / Increase metformin
If not at glycemic targets
LIFESTYLE
Add an agent best suited to the individual:
Patient CharacteristicsDegree of hyperglycemiaRisk of hypoglycemiaOverweight or obesityComorbidities (renal, cardiac, hepatic)Preferences & access to treatmentOther
See next page…
AT DIAGNOSIS OF TYPE 2 DIABETES
Agent CharacteristicsBG lowering efficacy and durabilityRisk of inducing hypoglycemiaEffect on weightContraindications & side-effectsCost and coverageOther
2013
2013
Foodintake
Stomach
GI tract
Intestine
α-cells
Pancreas
Insulin release
Net effect: Blood glucose
Beta-cells
Glucagon secretion
GLP-1
GLP-1 Actions
Adapted from: Barnett A. Int J Clin Pract 2006;60:1454-70; Drucker DJ, et al. Lancet 2006;368:1696-705; Idris I, et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2007;9:153-65.
DPP-4
Brain: reduced appetite
Stomach: reduced emptying
Toft-Nielsen MB, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3717–3723.
Baseline
Impaired GLP-1 secretion in T2DM
0 60 120 180 240
20
15
10
5
0
Normal subjectsIGTT2DM patients
Time (min)
GLP
-1 (p
mol
/l)
* * * * **
*
*p<0.05
GLP-1 AUC T2DM vs. NGT is decreased by 53%, p<0.001
Currently Available Incretins in Canada
• GLP-1 Analogues– Liraglutide = Victoza– Exenetide = Byetta
• More effective than DPP-IV Inhibitors
• Potential weight loss• Temporary Nausea• Injections• Expensive• Long term safety data
• DPP-IV Inhbitors– Sitaglipitin = Januvia– Saxagliptin = Onglyza– Linagliptin = Trajenta
• Less effective than GLP-1 Analogues
• Weight neutral• Well tolerated• Oral• Often covered by ODB• Long term safety data
Adapted from: Product Monographs as of March 1, 2013; CDA Guidelines 2008; and Yale JF. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16:S7-S10.
Antihyperglycemic agents and Renal Function
Not recommended / contraindicated SafeCaution and/or dose reduction
Repaglinide
Metformin 30 60
Saxagliptin
Linagliptin
Glyburide 30 50
Thiazolidinediones 30
GFR (mL/min): < 15 15-29 30-59 60-89 ≥ 90
CKD Stage: 5 4 3 2 1
Gliclazide/Glimepiride 15 30
Liraglutide 50
Exenatide 30 50
Acarbose 25
Sitagliptin 50
5015 2.5 mg
15
30 50 mg25 mg
What are the options for Insulin?
Insulin Type (trade name) Onset Peak Duration
Bolus (prandial) Insulins
Rapid-acting insulin analogues (clear):• Insulin aspart (NovoRapid®)• Insulin glulisine (Apidra™)• Insulin lispro (Humalog®)
10 - 15 min10 - 15 min10 - 15 min
1 - 1.5 h1 - 1.5 h1 - 2 h
3 - 5 h3 - 5 h
3.5 - 4.75 h
Short-acting insulins (clear):• Insulin regular (Humulin®-R)• Insulin regular (Novolin®geToronto)
30 min 2 - 3 h 6.5 h
Basal Insulins
Intermediate-acting insulins (cloudy):• Insulin NPH (Humulin®-N)• Insulin NPH (Novolin®ge NPH)
1 - 3 h 5 - 8 h Up to 18 h
Long-acting basal insulin analogues (clear)• Insulin detemir (Levemir®)• Insulin glargine (Lantus®)
90 min Not applicable
Up to 24 h(glargine 24 h,
detemir 16 - 24 h)
Types of Insulin
Insulin Type (trade name) Time action profile
Premixed Insulins
Premixed regular insulin – NPH (cloudy):• 30% insulin regular/ 70% insulin NPH (Humulin® 30/70)• 30% insulin regular/ 70% insulin NPH (Novolin®ge 30/70) • 40% insulin regular/ 60% insulin NPH (Novolin®ge 40/60)• 50% insulin regular/ 50% insulin NPH (Novolin®ge 50/50)
A single vial or cartridge contains a fixed ratio of insulin
(% of rapid-acting or short-acting insulin to % of intermediate-acting
insulin)
Premixed insulin analogues (cloudy):• 30% Insulin aspart/70% insulin aspart protamine crystals (NovoMix® 30)• 25% insulin lispro / 75% insulin lispro protamine (Humalog® Mix25®)• 50% insulin lispro / 50% insulin lispro protamine (Humalog® Mix50®)
Types of Insulin (continued)
Ser
um
Insu
lin L
evel
Time
Analogue Bolus: Apidra, Humalog, NovoRapid
Human Basal: Humulin-N, Novolin ge NPH
Analogue Basal: Lantus, Levemir
Human Bolus: Humulin-R, Novolin ge Toronto
Time
Ser
um
Insu
lin L
evel
Human Premixed: Humulin 30/70, Novolin ge 30/70
Analogue Premixed: Humalog Mix25, NovoMix 30
What about Hypoglycemia?
3 phases of hypo treatment
1. Acute
2. Intermediate
3. Future
¾ cup OJ 3 gluc tab 3 packs sugar
6 LifeSavers 1 tbsp honey
Acute
Intermediate
15 min recheck
Future
Why did it happen?
How do I prevent it?
Causes of hypo
Too little food
Too much activity
Too much insulin
Steps to Address Hypoglycemia1. Recognize autonomic or neuroglycopenic symptoms
2. Confirm if possible (blood glucose <4.0 mmol/L)
3. Treat with “fast sugar” (simple carbohydrate) (15 g) to relieve symptoms
4. Retest in 15 minutes to ensure the BG >4.0 mmol/L and retreat (see above) if needed
5. Eat usual snack or meal due at that time of day or a snack with 15 g carbohydrate plus protein
Hypoglycemia and Driving
• If BG <5.0 mmol/L prior to driving:– Take 15 g carbohydrate
– Re-check in 15 minutes
– When BG >5 mmol/L for at least 45 minutes safe to drive
• Need to re-check BG every 4 hours of continuous driving and carry simple carbohydrate snacks
Iain S. Begg et al . Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2003;27(2):128-140.
Safe blood glucose (BG) prior to drivingBG ≥ 5.0 mmol/L
Diabetes ComplicationsMacrovascular MicrovascularCerebral vascular disease
2-4 fold increase in CV mortality & stroke
Coronary artery disease8/10 will die from a CV event
Foot problems
RetinopathyLeading cause of blindness inworking-age adults
NephropathyLeading cause of ESRD
Peripheral NeuropathyLeading cause of non-traumatic LEA
Peripheral vascular disease
Erectile Dysfunction
C J Diabetes (2008); 32(suppl1): S1-S201
• ≥40 yrs old or
• Macrovascular disease or• Microvascular disease or• DM >15 yrs duration and age >30 years
or• Warrants therapy based on the 2012
Canadian Cardiovascular Society lipid guidelines
Among women with childbearing potential, statins should only be used in the presence of proper preconception counseling &
reliable contraception. Stop statins prior to conception.
2013Who Should Receive Statins?
Who Should Receive ACEi or ARB Therapy?
• ≥55 years of age or • Macrovascular disease or • Microvascular disease
At doses that have shown vascular protection (ramipril 10 mg daily, perindopril 8 mg daily, telmisartan 80 mg daily)
Among women with childbearing potential, ACEi or ARB should only be used in the presence of proper preconception
counseling & reliable contraception. Stop ACEi or ARB either prior to conception or immediately upon detection of pregnancy
2013
Summary of Pharmacotherapy for Hypertension in Patients with Diabetes
Threshold equal or over 130/80 mmHg and Target below 130/80 mmHg
With Nephropathy, CVD or CV risk factors
ACE Inhibitor or ARB
Diabetes
Withoutthe above
1. ACE Inhibitor or ARB or
2. Thiazide diureticor DHP-CCB
Monitor serum potassium and creatinine carefully in patients with CKD prescribed an ACEI or ARB
Combinations of an ACEI with an ARB are specifically not recommended in the absence of proteinuria
More than 3 drugs may be needed to reach target values
If Creatinine over 150 µmol/L or creatinine clearance below 30 ml/min ( 0.5 ml/sec), a loop diuretic should be substituted for a thiazide diuretic if control of volume is desired
Combination of 2 first line drugs may be considered
as initial therapy if the blood pressure is >20
mmHg systolic or >10 mmHg diastolic above
target
> 2-drug combinations
Vascular Protection Checklist A • A1C – optimal glycemic control (usually ≤7%)
B • BP – optimal blood pressure control (<130/80)
C • Cholesterol – LDL ≤2.0 mmol/L if decided to treat
D • Drugs to protect the heartA – ACEi or ARB │ S – Statin │ A – ASA if indicated
E • Exercise – regular physical activity, healthy diet,
achieve and maintain healthy body weight
S • Smoking cessation
2013
SCREEN regularly with random urine albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) and serum creatinine for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
DIAGNOSE with repeat confirmed ACR ≥2.0 mg/mmol and/or eGFR <60 mL/min
DELAY onset and/or progression with glycemic and blood pressure control and ACE-inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB)
PREVENT complications with “sick day management” counselling and referral when appropriate
2013
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Checklist
CKD in Diabetes
ACR ≥2.0 mg/mmol
and / or
eGFR <60 mL/min
2013
Stages of Diabetic Nephropathy
Note: change in definition of microalbuminuria ACR ≥2.0 mg/mmol2013
Beware of Transient Albuminuria
Reducing Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy
• Optimal glycemic control
• Optimal blood pressure control
• ACE-inhibitor (ACEi) or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB)
guidelines.diabetes.ca | 1-800-BANTING (226-8464) | diabetes.caCopyright © 2013 Canadian Diabetes Association
Counsel all Patients About
Sick Day Medication
List
2013
Retinopathy is rare in prepubertal children
Screen annually in T1DM, 5 years after onset in
individuals ≥15 years of age
Retinopathy Screening Reduces Risk of Blindness (T1DM)
Retinopathy may be present in 21-39% of patients with T2DM at diagnosis
Screen every 1-2 years in T2DM beginning at diagnosis
Screening Reduces Risk of Blindness (T2DM)
Retinopathy ChecklistSCREEN regularly
DELAY onset and progression with glycemic and blood pressure control ± fibrate
TREAT established disease with laser photocoagulation, intra-ocular injection of medications or vitreoretinal surgery
2013
FIELD: Retinopathy Requiring Laser
FIELD Study Investigators. Lancet 2005 ; 366 (9500): 1849-61
Cum
ulat
ive
risk
(%)
Years from randomization
HR = 0.7095% CI = 0.58–0.85p = 0.0003
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Placebo
6
Fenofibrate
• Longer duration of diabetes• Elevated A1C• Hypertension• Dyslipidemia• Low hemoglobin level• Pregnancy (with T1DM)• Proteinuria• Severe retinopathy itself
Risk Factors for Progression
Neuropathy
In people with type 2 diabetes, screening for peripheral neuropathy should begin at diagnosis of diabetes and occur annually thereafter. In people with type 1 diabetes, annual screening should commence after 5 years’ postpubertal duration of diabetes [Grade D, Consensus].
40-50% of People with DM will have Detectable Neuropathy within 10 years
• Sensorimotor poly- or mono-neuropathy• Increased risk for:
– Foot ulceration and amputation– Neuropathic pain– Significant morbidity– Usage of health care resources
• Elevated blood glucose• Elevated triglycerides• High BMI• Smoking• Hypertension
Risk Factors
Refer to neurology if non-diabetic neuropathy is suspected
Screening
Neuropathy
• Screen– 5 years after dx for Type 1 diabetes– At dx for Type 2 diabetes
• Method– Vibration sense on big toe– Monofilament testing
• Treatment– Optimize glycemic control– Antidepressant, anticonvulsants, opioids, topical agents
can be considered
Foot care• By individual AND health care professional• Screening at least annually and more often if high
risk• Evaluate for structural abnormalities, neuropathy,
PVD, ulcerations, infection• If high risk, provide foot care education,
professionally fitted footwear, early referral to professional trained in foot care
• Advise to stop smoking• If foot ulcer is present, need multidisciplinary team
Question• What percentage of people with diabetes and
established coronary artery disease have NO chest pain/symptoms of angina?1) 10-30%2) 20-50%3) 40-70%4) 50-80%
Screening for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Checklist
SCREEN with baseline resting ECG in select patients
STRESS TESTING for patients with symptoms or other associated diseases
REFER patients with inducible ischaemia to a cardiac specialist
2013
Age >40 years
Duration of DM >15 years +
Age >30 years
End organ damage– Microvascular– Macrovascular
Cardiac risk factors
Baseline resting
ECG
Repeat every 2 years
Who Should be Screened with ECG?
Exercise ECG stress testing
If cannot exercise or resting ECG abnormality present:– Pharmacologic stress
echo– Pharmacologic stress
nuclear imaging
Typical or atypical cardiac symptoms
Associated diseases:– PAD– Carotid bruits– TIA– Stroke
Resting ECG abnormalities (e.g. Q waves)
Who Should have Stress Testing and/or Functional Imaging to Screen for CAD?
Special populations …
Diabetes in the Elderly Checklist ASSESS for level of functional dependency (frailty)
INDIVIDUALIZE glycemic targets based on the above (A1C ≤ 8.5% for frail elderly) but if otherwise healthy, use the same targets as younger people
AVOID hypoglycemia in cognitive impairment
SELECT antihyperglycemic therapy carefully caution with sulfonylureas or thiazolidinediones Basal analogues instead of NPH or human 30/70 insulin Premixed insulins instead of mixing insulins separately
GIVE regular diets instead of “diabetic diets” or nutritional formulas in nursing homes
2013
Add an agent best suited to the individual (agents listed in alphabetical order):
Class RelativeA1C
Lowering
Hypo-glycemia
Weight Other therapeutic considerations Cost
-glucosidase inhibitor (acarbose)
Rare Neutral to
Improved postprandial control, GI side-effects
$$
Incretin agents: DPP-4 Inhibitors GLP-1 receptor agonists
to
RareRare
neutral GI side-effects
$$$$$$$
Insulin Yes No dose ceiling, flexible regimens $-$$$$
Insulin secretagogue: Meglitinide Sulfonylurea
Yes*Yes
*Less hypoglycemia in context of missed meals but usually requires TID to QID dosingGliclazide and glimepiride associated with less hypoglycemia than glyburide
$$$
Thiazolidinediones Rare CHF, edema, fractures, rare bladder cancer (pioglitazone), cardiovascular controversy (rosiglitazone), 6-12 weeks required for maximal effect
$$
Weight loss agent (orlistat)
None GI side effects $$$
• CAUTION in the elderly• Initial doses = HALF of usual dose• Avoid glyburide• Use gliclazide, gliclazide MR, glimepiride,
nateglinide or repaglinide instead
• CAUTION in the elderly • Increased risk of fractures• Increased risk of heart failure
• May use detemir or glargine instead of NPH or human 30/70 for less hypos
• Premixed insulins and prefilled insulin pens instead of mixing insulin to reduce dosing errors
Need a PRECONCEPTION checklist for women with pre-existing diabetes
1. Attain a preconception A1C of ≤ 7.0% (if safe)
2. Assess for and manage any complications
3. Switch to insulin if on oral agents
4. Folic Acid 5 mg/d: 3 mo pre-conception to 12 weeks post-conception
5. Discontinue potential embryopathic meds: Ace-inhibitors/ARB (prior to or upon detection of
pregnancy) Statin therapy
2013
OBJECTIVES/SUMMARY
• 1. Review highlights from the 2013 Canadian Diabetes Association Guidelines including diagnostic criteria and treatment goals
• 2. Discuss anti-hyperglyemic agent options after Metformin, focussing on newer medication options
• 3. Explore the complications of Diabetes and examine vascular protective strategies in individuals with Diabetes
THANK YOU!