txdot’s asr mitigation strategies - cptech · pdf fileoption 6: use of lithium admixture...

13
TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES Andy Naranjo, P.E. CST-M&P

Upload: vuongtu

Post on 14-Feb-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIESAndy Naranjo, P.E.CST-M&P

Page 2: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

ASR Affected Structures

2

Page 3: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

TxDOT ASR Mitigation Strategy

Consider ALL Aggregates Reactive– Evens the playing field for all aggregate suppliers – No premium for “non-

reactive” aggregate

3

Page 4: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

ASTM C 1260 for Fine Aggregates

Consider ALL Aggregates Reactive– Evens the playing field for all aggregate suppliers – No premium for “non-

reactive aggregate– Requires all concrete mixtures to incorporate a mitigation option– No aggregate reactivity testing – eliminates the discussion of whether

ASTM C 1260 or ASTM C 1293 is the proper test to conduct.

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82

AST

M C

126

0 Ex

pans

ion

Lim

esto

ne &

Dol

omite

Natural Sands

90% of sands tested thus far exceed 0.1% expansion79% of sands tested thus far exceed 0.2% expansion

4

Page 5: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

TxDOT ASR Mitigation Strategy

Consider ALL Aggregates Reactive– Evens the playing field for all aggregate suppliers – No premium for “non-

reactive” aggregate– No aggregate reactivity testing – eliminates the discussion of whether

ASTM C 1260 or ASTM C 1293 is the proper test to conduct.– Requires all concrete mixtures to incorporate a mitigation option

Eight ASR Mitigation Options– If mixture contains 520 lb/cy of cement or less, than Class C fly ash can

be used in lieu of Class F fly ash for non-structural classes of concrete– Options 1-5 & 7 are prescriptive methods– Option 6 & 8 require performance testing

5

Page 6: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

Concrete Mix Design Options

Option 1: Replace at least 20% to 35% of the cement with Class F Fly Ash.

14-Day Mortar Bar Expansion Results for Texas Class F Ash

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

% Replacement

% E

xpan

sion

27.5%

Class F CaO Content = 10% to 14%

6

Page 7: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

Concrete Mix Design Options

Option 2: Replace 35% to 50% of the cement with slag or MFFA. Option 3: Replace 35% to 50% of the cement with a

combination of Class F fly ash, slag, MFFA, metakaolin, or silica fume. No more than 35% may be fly ash and no more than 10% maybe silica fume. Option 4: Use Type IP or IS cement (also allows additional 10%

replacement with Class F fly ash, slag, or silica fume)– Type IP is required to contain at least 20% Class F fly ash– Type IS is required to contain at least 35% slag

Option 5: Replace 35% to 50% of the cement with a combination of Class C fly ash and at least 6% silica fume, UFFA, or metakaolin. No more than 35% may be fly ash and no more than 10% maybe silica fume.

7

Page 8: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

Concrete Mix Design Options

Option 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$– Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal/lb of alkali – dosage not always

effective– New spec requires modified ASTM C 1260 testing to determine lithium

dosage: minimum dosage of 0.55 gal/lb of alkali– Depending on initial results, may require ASTM C 1293 testing to

determine dosage: 2 year testAgg Source Fine Coarse

A 0.27 0.25B 0.37 Use 1293C 0.67D Use 1293E 0.46F 0.79 Use 1293G 0.78 0.66H Use 1293I Use 1293

Litium Dosage (gal/lb alkali)

8

Page 9: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

Concrete Mix Design Options

Option 7: Limits alkali loading to 3.5 lb/cy of concrete for straight cement mixtures.

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.0011

-Mar

-97

24-Ju

l-98

06-D

ec-9

9

19-A

pr-0

1

01-S

ep-0

2

14-Ja

n-04

28-M

ay-0

5

10-O

ct-0

6

22-F

eb-0

8

06-Ju

l-09

18-N

ov-1

0

Alka

li Co

nten

t, %

Na 2O

e

9

Page 10: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

Concrete Mix Design Options

Option 8: Performance Option– Used primarily to determine the dosage of Class C fly ash needed to

mitigate ASR– Require to perform ASTM C 1567 and meet a 14 day expansion of 0.08%– Option 8 has been modified in new 2014 specification

10

Page 11: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

Option 8 Supporting Tests

11

Page 12: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

Scen

ario

ASTM C 1260 Result

Testing Requirements for Mix Design Materials or Prescriptive Mix Design Options1Mix Design Fine Agg.

Mix Design Coarse Agg.

A > 0.10% > 0.10%• Determine the dosage of SCM’s needed to limit the 14-day expansion of each aggregate2 to 0.08% when

tested individually in accordance with ASTM C 1567, or • Use a minimum of 40% Class C fly ash having a maximum CaO3 content of 25%.

B

≤ 0.10% ≤ 0.10% • Use a minimum of 40% Class C fly ash having a maximum CaO3 content of 25%, or• Use any ternary combination which replaces 35 to 50% of cement.

≤ 0.10%ASTM C 12931 yr Expansion

≤ 0.04%

• Use a minimum of 20% of any Class C fly ash, or • Use any ternary combination which replaces 35 to 50% of cement.

C ≤ 0.10% > 0.10%• Determine the dosage of SCM’s needed to limit the 14-day expansion of coarse and intermediate2

aggregate to 0.08% when tested individually in accordance with ASTM C 1567, or • Use a minimum of 40% Class C fly ash having a maximum CaO3 content of 25%.

D

> 0.10% ≤ 0.10% • Use a minimum of 40% Class C fly ash having a maximum CaO3 content of 25%, or• Use any ternary combination which replaces 35 to 50% of cement.

> 0.10%ASTM C 12931 yr Expansion

≤ 0.04%

• Determine the dosage of SCM’s needed to limit the 14-day expansion of fine aggregate to 0.08% when tested in accordance with ASTM C 1567.

1. Do not use Class C fly ash if the ASTM C 1260 value of the fine, intermediate, or coarse aggregate is 0.30% or greater, unless the fly ash is used as part of a ternary system.

2. Intermediate size aggregates shall fall under the requirements of mix design coarse aggregate.3. Average the CaO content from the previous ten values as listed on the mill certificate.

12

Page 13: TXDOT’S ASR MITIGATION STRATEGIES - CPTech · PDF fileOption 6: Use of Lithium Admixture – Never Been Used On TxDOT Project: $$$$ – Previously required a dosage of 0.55 gal

Questions?

13