two talks for the price of one: cooling by angulon annihilation and asymmetrical fermion superfluids...

19
Two talks for the price of Two talks for the price of one: one: Cooling by angulon Cooling by angulon annihilation annihilation and and Asymmetrical fermion Asymmetrical fermion superfluids superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H. Caldas

Post on 20-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Two talks for the price of Two talks for the price of one:one:

Cooling by angulon Cooling by angulon annihilation annihilation

andand Asymmetrical fermion Asymmetrical fermion

superfluidssuperfluids

P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab)

G. Rupak, M. Savage, H. Caldas

Page 2: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Cooling of neutron stars by "angulon" annihilationCooling of neutron stars by "angulon" annihilationLight element

envelope

Heavy element envelope

GemingaVela

• Neutron stars start their lives hot and cool down by neutrino and photon emission

• After a minute, degenerate

• Cooling curves depend on emissivity, specific heat, thermal conduction, etc …

Determined by low-lying excitations

Unique laboratory to learn about dense matter

Page et al.

Page 3: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Neutron pairing in the Neutron pairing in the 33PP22 channel for channel for

densities higher than densities higher than nuclear saturationnuclear saturation

most attractive channel

2T

i j ijn n �

traceless symmetric matrix

Page 4: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

2T

ij i jn n �

ij real (favored close to Tc)

determined by an orthonormal frame + 2 eigenvalues

2

30

2

3

1 0 0

0 0

0 0

i

i

e

e

eigenvalues are roots of 1

1

0 2

1 2

0 0

0 0

0 0

Page 5: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

(2) (3) (1)S LSU SO U (3) (1)JSO U

Symmetry (breaking) patternSymmetry (breaking) pattern

tensor/spin-orbit

discrete discretetensor/spin-orbit

0nn 0nn

approximate exact

4 exactly massless Goldstone bosons4 exactly massless Goldstone bosons

Page 6: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Ripples in the sea of frames =

angulonsangulons

• Contrary to other excitations, not exponentially suppressed by Boltzman factors, dominate low energy/temperature properties

• Couples to neutrino through neutral currents

0 † iA iC Z n n

• Dimensional analysis:

2 9 3,F VG T c T

Page 7: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Effective theory

For E << 0 :i T

S LU e U R R Δ

phasespin

rotationorbital

rotation

2† 2 † 2 †

0 02

00

0

† †0

8 i i i ik j kj

iiV

fv w

H

L Tr Tr

i Z Tr J

Matching to a simple "microscopic" theory

22

2 2 2

20

31

5v

4

F

F

VV

Mk

v

f

f

w

CH

Page 8: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Rate for angulon+angulon

• No rotation symmetry: big complicated mess

• = v k

enhancement on the number of angulons ~ (T/v)3

suppression due to E ~ v

suppression due to kinematical constraint (no decay with v=0)

suppression on the coupling ~ v39

2 17 9 393

3 316 3 3 0

V 9

0.1510 /

v v

0.154 10 /

v v

F

TG T erg cm s

Tc T erg cm K

Page 9: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Does it matter for cooling ?Does it matter for cooling ?

Above Tc no: (modified) Urca N+N N+N+l+

Below Tc maybe: e+e e+e+

But pair formation around TBut pair formation around Tc c on a shellon a shell

~ 1020 T97

A more detailed study is A more detailed study is probably necessaryprobably necessary

Page 10: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H
Page 11: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Pairing in asymmetrical superfluidsPairing in asymmetrical superfluids

Two fermion species: A and B

up and down quarks, two

different atoms or hyperfine states in a trap,

A Bn ndifferent Fermi surfaces,

pairing ?

Page 12: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Relevance for neutron (quark) stars, atomic traps renewed the interest on the problem: some new,

interesting suggestions for the ground state

Variational arguments can rigorously show what is NOT a

ground state

Page 13: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

To make it concrete:

3 3 3

† † † †3 3 3

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )(2 ) (2 ) (2 )

A Bi i k A A k B B A B B A

d k d k d pH N k k k k g p p k k

2

2ik i

i

k

M

mean-field, low density, /<<1

2 3 3

† †3 3

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )(2 ) (2 )

Bi i k k k k

d k d kH N E E k k E k k

g

3

3( ) ( )

(2 ) B A

d kg k k

2

2 2

A B A Bi k k k kkE

Bogoliubov transformation:

Page 14: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

2 3 3

† †3 3

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )(2 ) (2 )

Bi i k k k k

d k d kH N E E k k E k k

g

slightly different problem: A and B fixed: minimize H-N

Fill states with negative Ek

† † † †

0 0 0

| ( ) | 0 ( ( ) ( )) ( ) | 0k k k

k k B A BE E E

S k u v k k k

BCS filled with B

Page 15: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

A=B

1st order transition

B-A=2

Page 16: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

In the real problem nA and nB are fixed: local maximum

(Sarma state) suggested as the ground state (Liu &Wilczek,

gapless superconductor)

† † †

0 0

| ( ( ) ( )) ( ) | 0k k

k k B A BE E

S u v k k k

Page 17: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Mixed state:

(1 )

(1 )A A

B B

n xn x n

n xn x n

,( , ) min ( , ) (1 ) ( )MIXED A B N A B BCS

x nE n n x E n n x E n

minimize

Which is smaller: EMIXED or ESARMA ?

normal fraction

Page 18: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

Sarma=BCS=Mixed

Sarmamixed

Sarma=normal

EMIXED < ESARMA

Page 19: Two talks for the price of one: Cooling by angulon annihilation and Asymmetrical fermion superfluids P. Bedaque (Berkeley Lab) G. Rupak, M. Savage, H

•In atomic traps, bubbles can be imaged. Long sought evidence for superfluidity in fermionic atomic traps ?

• Different dispersion relations (relativity) don’t change anything

•Three flavors is (may be) different !