two-phase flow patterns and flow boiling heat...

18
MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 1 [email protected] Two-phase flow patterns and flow boiling heat transfer for R-245fa in a 3.00 mm tube at high reduced temperature Romain CHARNAY Rémi REVELLIN Jocelyn BONJOUR Université de Lyon, INSA-Lyon, CETHIL UMR5008, F-69621 VILLEURBANNE, France

Upload: vuphuc

Post on 26-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 1

[email protected]

Two-phase flow patterns and flow

boiling heat transfer for R-245fa

in a 3.00 mm tube

at high reduced temperature

Romain CHARNAY

Rémi REVELLIN

Jocelyn BONJOUR

Université de Lyon, INSA-Lyon, CETHIL UMR5008, F-69621 VILLEURBANNE, France

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014

• Energy recovery in transport: exhaust gas temperatures : 400 – 900°C

• Refrigerant evaporation temperature > 100°C

• Working fluid : R-245fa

2

Why should we study flow boiling at high

(reduced) temperature ?

For the development of Organic Rankine Cycles

Because it may bring new insights into the physics of flow boiling

(unconventional variation of fluid properties)

flow patterns

heat transfer coefficient

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 3

Experimental setup and test conditions

Parameter Range

din [mm] 3.00

Levap [mm] 185.0

q [kW/m²] 10 – 90 ± 2-5 %

G [kg/m².s] 100 – 1500 ± 2 %

Tsat [°C] 60 – 120 ± 0.2 – 0.8

Psat [bar] 4.4 – 19.2

x [-] 0 – 1

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 4

Determination of flow patterns

Four observed flow patterns

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014

G = 300 kg/m².s, q = 50 kW/m², x = 0.30

Tsat = 60°C

Annular flow – f = 0 Hz

Tsat = 120°C

Intermittent flow– f = 41 Hz

5

Influence of Tsat on the flow pattern

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 6

Tsat

σ dbub

ρvap

bubble length Tsat σ stratification

Influence of Tsat on the flow pattern

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014

Tsat = 100°C, q = 50 kW/m² Tsat = 120°C, q = 50 kW/m²

7 29

The higher the Tsat, the narrower the range of vapor quality corresponding to annular flow whereas the larger the range of vapor quality for intermittent flow

The higher the Tsat, the lower the vapor quality corresponding to dryout flow regime inception

The higher the Tsat, the lower the vapor quality corresponding to mist flow regime inception

Influence of Tsat on the flow pattern

MIST DRY OUT

ANNULAR

INTERMITTENT

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 8 35

Two mechanisms were assumed to govern flow boiling heat transfer:

• The nucleate boiling (NB) formation of bubbles at the wall

• The convective boiling (CB) conduction and convection (liquid film)

evaporation at the liquid-vapor interface

These mechanisms were related to heat transfer coefficient (α):

• When NB is dominant, α = f(q, Tsat) & α ≠ f(G, x)

• When CB is dominant, α = f(G,x) & α ≠ f(q)

• When NB and CB are equally important, α = f(G,q,x)

Results on heat transfer

CB

NB

CB

NB

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 39 9

Results on heat transfer

36

Influence of mass velocity Tsat = 60°C

Low G

High G

NB

NB

CB

CB

G = 300 kg/m².s

G = 500 kg/m².s

G = 1000 kg/m².s

G = 700 kg/m².s

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 39 10

Results on heat transfer

36

Influence of mass velocity Tsat = 120°C

Low G

High G

NB

NB

CB

CB

37

G = 500

G = 300 kg/m².s

G = 1000 kg/m².s

G = 700

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 40

Influence of saturation temperature G = 300 kg/m².s

NB

NB

CB

CB High Tsat

Low Tsat

Tsat = 60°C

Tsat = 120°C

Tsat = 100°C

Tsat = 80°C

11

Results on heat transfer

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 12

The main conclusions on the influence of the saturation temperature on the flow

patterns and the heat transfer are:

• The higher Tsat, the smaller and shorter the bubbles

• The higher Tsat, the greater the tendency to flow stratification

• The higher Tsat, the lower the value of vapor quality for dry-out inception

• The higher Tsat, the greater the flow boiling heat transfer coefficient

• The higher Tsat, the greater the contribution of nucleate boiling to the overall heat

transfer coefficient

• The higher Tsat, the lower the contribution of convective boiling to the overall

heat transfer coefficient

Such information must be taken into account when designing evaporators for Organic

Rankine Cycles and other cycles with evaporation at high reduced temperature.

Conclusions

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 13

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 14

Results on flow patterns

Flow pattern characterization

Image processing method 1

Heat transfer coefficient behavior 2

2 R. Charnay, J. Bonjour and R. Revellin, Experimental investigation of R-245fa flow boiling in minichannels at high saturation temperatures: flow patterns and flow pattern maps, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 46, pp. 1-16 (2014).

1 R. Charnay, R. Revellin, and J. Bonjour, Flow pattern characterization for R-245fa in minichannels: optical measurement technique and experimental results, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 57, pp. 169-181 (2013).

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 15

R245fa Critical temperature = 154 °C = 427 K Critical pressure = 36,5 bar molar mass = 134 g/mol at 60 °C P/Pcrit = 0,12 T/Tcrit = 0,78 at 120°C P/Pcrit = 0,52 T/Tcrit = 0,92

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 16

Results on flow patterns

Flow pattern characterization from heat transfer coefficient behavior

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 39 17

Results on heat transfer

36

Influence of mass velocity low T : physical explanation ?

Tsat = 60°C

Low G

High G

NB

NB

CB

CB

x

δL

ubub

Rth

convection conduction

CB

G

G = 300

G = 500

G = 1000

G = 700

MFIP – Sestri Levante (GE), Italy – 17-19 Sept. 2014 39 18

Results on heat transfer

36

Influence of mass velocity Tsat = 120°C

G

Low G

High G

NB

NB

CB

CB

37

Tsat

lbub fbub

NB

x

fbub

NB

lbub

x

NB > CB

ubub λL

convection conduction

Tsat

CB