tv type and implications · for the design, roosevelt island, new york, 1975 o.m. ungers, roosevelt...

31
The word ‘ type ’ comes from the Greek word typos which means ‘model, matrix, impression, mould, mark, figure in relief, original form’ and from the Latin word typus which means ‘figure, image, form, kind’. Community Catalogue. 2007

Upload: others

Post on 25-Aug-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

The word ‘type’ comes from the Greek word typos which means ‘model, matrix, impression, mould, mark, figure in relief, original form’ and from the Latin word

typuswhich means ‘figure, image, form, kind’.

Community Catalogue. 2007

Page 2: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

TV type and implications

Page 3: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Animal “Types”

Page 4: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

'A Pattern Language' by Christopher Alexander - #106 Positive Outdoor Space

Page 5: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Stan Allen: Diagrams of Field Conditions, 1996

“All grids are fields, but not all fields are grids. One of the potentials of the field is to redefine the relation between figure and ground. If we think of the figure not as a demarcated object read against a stable field, but as an effect emerging from the field itself – as moments of intensity, as peaks or valley within a continuous field – than it might be possible to imagine figure and field as more closely allied. (…)”

Page 6: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

The common understanding of ‘type’ refers to an object or artifact that belongs to a class or group that brings together others with similar attributes.

Page 7: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

The common understanding of ‘type’ refers to an object or artifact that belongs to a class or group that brings together others with similar attributes.

Page 8: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

‘Type’ is the idea or symbolic meaning that is embodied in an element, an object or a thing. Thus ‘type’ is abstract and conceptual rather than concrete and literal.

[Quatremère de Quincy] (http://thecityasaproject.org/2011/08/type/).

Page 9: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Louis Kahn (from "Licht und Raum- light and space", Urs Büttiker) The chronological listing of projects traces Kahn's development process in light control and modulation.

Page 10: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975

Page 11: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975

Page 12: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan – December 1, 1997

Page 13: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New
Page 14: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New
Page 15: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Urban Rooms drawn by Camillo Sitte (Vienna 1889)

Page 16: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

1. Ahmedabad; 2. Barcelona; 3. San Francisco; 4. Venezia; 5. Wien; 6. Walnut Creek

Page 17: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Ungers vs. Rowe, attempted to produce a theoretical argument about two divergent Cornell legacies: one, O.M. Ungers and the other, Colin Rowe as exemplary urban design positions

(http://archinect.com/features/article/58887387/archipelagos-ungers-vs-rowe)

Page 18: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Ungers vs. Rowe, attempted to produce a theoretical argument about two divergent Cornell legacies: one, O.M. Ungers and the other, Colin Rowe as exemplary urban design positions

(http://archinect.com/features/article/58887387/archipelagos-ungers-vs-rowe)

Page 19: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Noli plan, Rome (public buildings as public spaces)

Page 21: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Building Typology make the City

Page 22: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Eixample in Barcelona / Density beloved and bemoaned.

Page 23: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Eixample in Barcelona / Density beloved and bemoaned.

Page 24: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Eixample in Barcelona / Density beloved and bemoaned.

Page 25: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

Eixample in Barcelona / Density beloved and bemoaned .

Page 26: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New
Page 27: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New
Page 28: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

FARUM, DENMARK, Architecture Mixed Use Typology

Page 29: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

FARUM, DENMARK, Architecture Mixed Use Typology

Page 30: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

FARUM, DENMARK, Architecture Mixed Use Typology

Page 31: TV type and implications · for the Design, Roosevelt Island, New York, 1975 O.M. Ungers, Roosevelt Island Competition, Table of the Building Typology Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New

FARUM, DENMARK, Architecture Mixed Use Typology (http://www.we-a.dk/Farum-Denmark)