tru plm kickoff vendor

7/30/2019 TRU PLM Kickoff Vendor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tru-plm-kickoff-vendor 1/16

PLM Hardlines Vendor Kickoff

July, 2008



© 2007 Confidential and proprietary to Infosys Technologies Ltd 2

Agenda

9:30 - 10:30 System Overview Presentation

10:30 – 11:30 Demo




Table of Content

1 Project Objective

2 Project Approach

3 Launch Timeline

4 TRU Product Development Process Overview

5 TRU Process Details




What is Product Lifecycle ManagementTool (PLM)?

Merchandising Development SourcingDesign Production Logistics

Workflow

Visibility

Merch Planning

Assort Plan

Buy Plan

Location Plan

Open To Buy

Concepts

Sketches

Colors

Line Plan

Raw Mat Approvals

Dimensional Specs

Sampling

Technical Specs

Costing

RFQ

PO Mgmt

Consumption

Materials QA

FG QA

Scorecard

Ship & Track

Customs

Finance / LC

ELC / ALC

DC Receipt

Transportation

Product Portfolio Management

PLM Related Sourcing Related Other KEY:




“R” Us PLM Project Objectives

• PLM initiative for Product Development effectiveness through

enhanced processes and technology to: – Fast track Product Development to ensure brand competitiveness to sustain

growth

– Increase creative time while reducing system time required to create and shareproduct information globally

– Track, monitor and administer information related to Private Label ProductDevelopment

– Apply technology to automate Product Development through a seamless,integrated system that enables global collaboration with internal and externalstakeholders

– Track and monitor assets across time and geographies, including:

• contracts• creative assets

• manufacturing assets

– Manage global product specifications creation through real-time collaboration




Project Approach: Global Design – Local Rollout

• Detailed requirements will be gathered for all businesses

• Flexible solution design to support most business requirements

• Rollout product lines, locations, partners and functionality in phasedmanner

• Development work will support only selected product lines and geography• System integration will be implemented in later phases

• Manual data migration to support selected product lines and geography

• Change management and Training for selected product line andgeography

Program Management & Change ManagementTransition and

SupportUser

Acceptance

P r o j e c t

P r e-i ni t i a t i on

RollOut

RollOut

System Build and IntegrationCRPRequirements

and Design

Periods of High User

Interaction

Periods of Low User

Interaction

Aug 6 – Sep 28 Dec 11 – Jan 18 June – Sept




Initial Launch – Product Line, Partners, Timing and Geographies

• Initial Launch:

Workflow Product Line First season in TC System LaunchHardlines; Totally Me Tween Spring 09 Jan 08

• Initial Launch to include US operations only

• Manage international aspect during Initial Launch:

– Requirements gathering to include international inputs – Solution design should provide for easy transition to international

requirements and workflows

– Testing and system training to include US and Hong Kong (for US and Asianusers and vendors)

– Provide:

• Automated alerts and messaging where US workflows integrate with non-USprocesses (example: 5L Packaging Development)

• View only access for international business

• Manual workarounds to input global quantities in the system




Overview of High Level Process




Hardlines – Toys – Single Source PD – Ideation to Release

PD Creates (or

copies for

refresh items)Product in

System

Vendor

DevelopsReference

Sample

Finalize

Product,Price &

Quantity

PD/Sourcing

UpdateProduct details

in System

Text, Image, File

Attachment,

Quantity, HTS

PD

ReleasesProduct

Notify Vendor

PD Initiates Idea

Generation byCreating

Directional Assortment Plan

Buyer respondwith Ideas and

expected

quantities

PD refinesideas

PD generatesreport to

review ideas

Later Phase

PD refines

product details

– changes toexistingproduct

Vendor, Text,

Image, File

Attachment

Notifi

cation

Text, Image, File

Attachment

Product isSelected in

Line - ReviewMeeting and

commentscaptured

HL Toys RFQ/

Costing

Vendor updates Quote

Details inSystem ELC,

UPC, etc.

PD finalizesproduct details

and spec for quotation

Vendor provide

feedbackand ideas

IR

PD checks

Licensor

Concept Approval if

needed

PD checksLicensor Product

Approval if needed

If required

Sourcingenters

“Vendor”




Alert if Lab does not update results within

10 B days after sample receipt date

(6)

Raw Mat isReceived

(5)

Vendor Receives

PO

Alert if vendor

does not Send

sample within

14 days after

Product Release

(3)

Hardlines – Toys – PD – Release to Ship

Hardlines –

Toys – Safety

Compliance

(QA)

(3)

PD completes

JSF/ISF in

System

Hardlines –

Toys –

Packaging

(US)

1

(2)

Vendor

Creates

Lab Eval

Sample

Lab in

Hong

Kong/

USA

performsevaluation

Test

request

form

Lab upload

eval results

PDF in System

Legal

Review

form

Conduct

Legal

Review/

Trademark

Search

Die line

(4)

Vendor

Updates that

Photo Sample

was sent in the

system

Vendor

Creates

and sends

Productn

Samples

Lab in

Hong

Kong/USA

performs

COC/LOE

test

Pass Yes

Notification

Vendor

TakesCorrective

Action

No

Notification

PD &

Packaging

Review

1

(1)Vendor

Starts

Tooling

TimeTime Sensitive Events

Calendar

Events(5)(2)(1) (4)

(8)

Vendor

acknowledges

receipt of COC

in the system

One check

per region

(9)

DHL/Vendor*

enters that

goods were

shipped

* DHL for

Imports

Vendor for

Domestic

(4)

(7)

VendorsReceives

PkgingOne check

per region (9)

Production

(6) (7) (8) (9)

Sample

Complete

Lab

acknowledges

sample receipt

Yes

No

- Alert

Alert if Lab does not acknowledge within

4 B days after sample sent date

IRPD inputs

number of

samples(dot.com,

Licensor, etc.)




Process Detail

-RFQ-Sample Submission-COC

-Packaging




RFQ Steps

Sourcing

GeneratesRequest for

Quote (RFQ)

System

attaches

details to RFQ

Vendor

updates

requested

information

· Product details

· Details on options requested

· Delivery Date

· Case Pack

· Quantity

· Remarks

· Etc.

Vendor sends

Quote

Sourcing

reviews quotein RFQ

Collective view

Sourcing

accepts quote

in system

System sends

acceptance/

rejection email

and updates

fields

Accepted

Yes

No

Action

No

Sourcing

sendsconfirmation

and PO

Vendor

reviews

information in

System

Alert if vendor does not

respond to RFQ in 14 days

· FOB (One for each region)

· Delivery Date (One for each region)

· MOQ

· Remarks

· Etc.




Sample Submission

OK

Safety

Provides

Comments

BM Requests

Corrections

and Provides

Comments

Alert to Vendor

and BM

No

Yes

Alert if QA does not

update results within2 B days after Lab Eval

Yes

BM reviews

Lab Evaluation

Europe to

review Legal

Panel Code

Alert if Lab does not update results within10 B days after sample receipt date

(2)

Vendor

Creates

Lab Eval

Sample

Lab in

Hong

Kong/

USA

performs

evaluation

Test

request

form

Lab upload

eval results

PDF in System

SampleComplete

Lab

acknowledges

sample receipt

Yes

No

- Alert

Alert if Lab does not acknowledge within4 B days after sample sent date

1

Safety

Reviews

Results




Production Samples and COC/LOE

Vendor

Creates

and sends

Productn

Sample

Lab in

Hong

Kong/USA

performs

COC/LOEtest

Pass Yes

Notification

Vendor

Takes

Corrective

Action

No

Notification

(8)

Vendor

acknowledges

receipt of COC

in the system

One check

per region (9)



© 2007 Confidential and proprietary to Infosys Technologies Ltd

16

What is the next step?

• Provide Logon to system, get the technical aspect settle

• Vendor will be invited to join training sessions from July toNovember

• July 31st go live with System on Fall 09 items (based on brand

schedule from July to November • Cost of license $1400

tru plm kickoff vendor

Documents