Treatment of Contaminated Soil || New Developments in Soil Washing Technology

Download Treatment of Contaminated Soil || New Developments in Soil Washing Technology

Post on 11-Dec-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents

4 download

TRANSCRIPT

29 New Developments in Soil Washing Technology Th. NeeBe Department of Environmental Process Engineering and Recycling, University of Erlangen-Nilrnberg, Paul-Gordan-StraBe 3, 91052 Erlangen, Germany 29.1 Introduction In Germany we can now look back on more than a decade of experience in soil washing based on the state of the art of mineral processing techniques (NeeBe and Grohs 1990a; NeeBe and Grohs 1990b; NeeBe and Grohs 1991a; NeeBe and Grohs 1991b; Wilichowski and Werther 1996). In recent years washing technology has changed remarkably. The cost of soil cleaning 10 years ago is now no longer ac-ceptable. As a result of competition with biotechnology, in situ-technologies and natural attenuation, the tonnages sent for soil washing have been reduced dramati-cally. This is a challenge that can be met only by a new generation of soil washing plants, which is the subject of this paper. 29.2 Process Flow Sheet of a Soil Decontamination Plant Industrial soil washing processes to meet the specific requirements of the con-tamination to be removed can be developed on the basis of laboratory tests (Feil et al. 1994; Feil1997; NeeBe et al. 1997). The process stages of a soil decontamina-tion unit are shown schematically in fig. 29.1. The configuration of individual process stages can vary greatly, depending on the material and the objective of decontamination. The actual washing process is preceded by a dry soil preparation. This includes storage, feed regulation and pre-crushing of the material. Of decisive importance for the washing effect is the subsequent wet liberation, the aim of which is to disperse the agglomerated fme particles. In this process, soil is suspended in water by the application of mechanical energy. If required, liberation may be performed in two stages, when the sand particles are subjected to a second treatment in the previously thickened suspension. The relevant apparatus are encapsulated and equipped with air exhaust systems to allow highly volatile components to be re-moved. The exhaust air is passed through activated carbon filters and cleaned. R. Stegmann et al. (eds.), Treatment of Contaminated Soil Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001462 Physical Treatment .. " .2 :a ~ " II u _.6._ gravel sand silt contaminated soil , ................................................ ~ ...... . destiming ~ .... :.:.!.~.~.:.?J..~~ .... . ! 10-IOOJ!m residue residue additional modules core modules Fig. 29.1. Process flow sheet of a soil decontamination plant residue fresh water water repellend The main principle of soil washing is a selective classification of fmes, which are highly contaminated due to the large specific surface. In stepwise fashion the soil is sized on sieves and hydrocyclones, where cleaned gravel and sand can be separated. The remaining suspension with fines < 63 11m is subjected to a solid/liquid phase separation process resulting in a cohesive contaminated waste product. The process water is returned to the wash water circuit. These processes are basic to the core modules of every soil washing plant. For special cases auxiliary modules can be added. In these, density sorting for the elimination of highly contaminated organic matter is often carried out. Further, alternative processes for the cleaning of fines < 100 11m can be consid-ered: flotation (Wilichowski 1994), leaching processes (Kramer and Koch 1992), high gradient magnetic separation and microbiological processes. New Developments in Soil Washing Technology 463 29.3 First Generation of Soil Washing Plants The first generation plant in Germany was characteristically: Stationary centralised plants with a relatively high throughput of up to 30-70 t h-1. Expensive cleaning of fines and waste water treatment. Negative water balance and consequently indirect discharge of a more or less large amount of cleaned waste water. Operational costs of up to 20Q-400 DM f 1, depending on the level/type of contamination. Advantages of the washing technologies are: Soft technology using natural principles of wet self-cleaning of the soil with a moderate energy requirement. High cleaning efficiency, as can be seen from table 29.1. Low operational costs for the coarse soil fractions. High level of technology based on the state of the art of modern mineral processing. Disadvantages are: No soil remediation, but production of a low-cost building material (gravel and sand). Highly contaminated residue of the fine fractions. High operational costs for cleaning of fine fractions and waste water treatment. Table 29.1. Data on soil washing plants Process Parameters Throughput [t h"1] low moderate high soil recovery [%] cleaning efficiency [%] recirculation water flow [m' f 1] fresh water demand [m' h"1] specific energy consumption [kWh f 1] reagent demand [kg f 1] (flocculants, surfactants) Value < 10 10 -30 30 -70 75 -90 85 -95 3 - 4 0.1- 0.3 7 -35 0.3- 0.8 464 Physical Treatment 29.4 New Generation of Soil Washing Plants The second-generation plants have been developed mainly because of the need to reduce operating costs. This can be accomplished by the following measures: Use of mobile or semimobile plants in modular form with low or moderate throughput of 10-20 t h-1 Treatment of contaminated soil and other mineral waste. Reduction of the core cleaning modules to those needed for gravity processes, classification and density sorting. Application of costly processes for fme fraction cleaning, such as leaching, and flotation only in special cases. High intensity attrition as a special development for soil washing. Use of more sophisticated waste water treatment if possible with a positive water balance (no waste water discharge). A typical flow sheet of a modem soil washing plant, offered by AKW Apparate + Verfahren GmbH & Co. KG in Hirschau/Oberpfalz (Germany), can be seen in fig. 29.2. 29.4.1 Wash Water Circuit For a soil washing plant to function correctly, the logistics of water flow are of prime importance. Some variants of the flow circuit are presented in fig. 29.3. Fig. 29.3a, b demonstrate two traditional variants with negative water balance (waste water discharge). Fig. 3c shows the modem configuration with process water treatment integrated into solid/liquid separation. The feed to waste water treatment is a fine sludge with a solids content of approx. 5Q-100 g r 1 In solid/liquid separation, the objective pursued is to bind contaminations largely to the solid phase. One requirement for a positive water balance without waste water discharge is a suffcient proportion of fines in the soil. However, a fmes fraction > 20 % threatens the profitability of soil processing because the recovery of washed soil will be too low. When the proportion of fme sludge is too low, more sludge can be produced artificially by means of hydroxide precipitation or addi-tion ofbetonite. The addition of Fe (III) or AI {III) leads to the formation of voluminous hy-droxide sludges which, for example, can bind heavy metal ions through adsorp-tion. For de-emulsification of hydrocarbon contaminants, organic emulsion split-ting agents are used. This is achieved with polymers having molar masses of between 50,000 and 500,000, which have a flocculation effect on the solid phase and a coagulating effect on the oil phase. By integration of flocculation and ad-sorption, a highly contaminated sludge mixture of organic and mineral substances is formed, which is dewatered in the solid/liquid separation process stage to obtain a solid product. The sludge mixture is either taken to a special disposal site or subjected to a special process (e.g. thermal, biological). In this process stage, New Developments in Soil Washing Technology 465 process water in which the dissolved and emulsified contaminants are reduced is recirculated. Cleaned Gravel +-Density >2mm Sorting ReLe Residue +-Cleaned Sand +-63 .... 200 Jlffi Contaminated Soil l Dry Soil Preparation l Wet Liberation l Sieving l "'l ~ N \C !-- :::::1 ~ ..., ~: < ~. ~ ~ s "' .: l Jg. "'0 ~ feedcleaned fraction contam. filter cakeresidue a) effluent treatment in bypassfeedcleaned fraction contaminated filter cakeflash water b) wash water and flash water circuits feed fresh water cleaned fraction contaminatedfilter cakec) closed water circuit water change :::::::::> .,. 0) 0) 1J ::r ' 63 l!m fraction. This corresponds to a cleaning efficiency of 84 %. In comparison, cleaning efficiency with conven-tional attrition treatment reached just 840 mg (kg dry solids)"1 The fine fraction < 63 l!m formed during high-performance attrition accounted for 9.5 mass.-%. For high-performance attrition, part of the cleaned coarse material > 1 mm was recir-culated to the material feed and added to the attrition process (mass ratio of fine to coarse material1:1). In this way a constant solids concentration of 1200 g r 1 (cor-responding to a solids content of 45 vol.-% for quartz) could be maintained in the attrition process. Table 29.2. Process conditions and cleaning results for high-performance attrition of a 63 )!m-2 mm sand contaminated with mineral oil (Tiefel et al. 1999) Process Parameters Specific energy input [kWh f 1] Attrition time [ s] Primary feedback ratio [-] in the closed circuit system Quantity of fine particles< 63 )!m after high-performance attrition[%] MHC concentration> 63 )!ill before high-performance attrition [mg kg-1] MHC concentration> 63 )!ill- after conventional attrition [mg kg-1] MHC concentration> 63 )!ill after high-performance attrition [mg kg-1] Decontamination efficiency[%] Value 20.0 280 1.0 9.5 1845 840 300 84 470 Physical Treatment 29.6 Summary A new generation of soil washing plants has been developed mainly because of the need to reduce operating costs. This can be accomplished by the following measures: Reduction of the core cleaning modules to those needed for gravity processes, classification and density sorting, and attrition. Application of costly processes for fme fraction cleaning, such as leaching, and flotation only in special cases. High intensity attrition uses solid concentrations > 40 vol.-% and higher me-chanical energy input for producing a higher percentage of attrited fmes < 1 0 f.!m up to 1Q-15 %. The stabilisation of a high-solids concentration by controlled recirculation of endogenous coarse material ensured the cleaning of fractions that could otherwise not be cleaned sufficiently, using conventional attrition techniques. References Feil A, Wetzel H, NeeBe T (1994) Charakterisierung der Sanierbarkeit kontaminierter BOden. Aufbereitungs-Technik 3: 56--60 Feil A (1997) Untersuchungen zur Aufbereitbarkeit kontaminierter BMen. PhD-Thesis, Univer-sitlit Erlangen-Ntlmberg, Gennany Kramer U, Koch P (1992) Zur Anwendung von Laugungstechnologien bei der Dekontamination von Boden. Neue Bergbautechn 22 1: 13-17 Mitteilung der AKW Apparate + Verfahren GmbH und Co KG, Hirschau (2000) Hochleistung-sattrition unter Produktionsbedingungen. Aufbereitungs-Technik 41 4: 195 NeeBe T, Grohs H (1990a) NaBmechanische Aufbereitung kontaminierter BOden. Aufbereitungs-Technik 31: 563-569 NeeBe T, Grohs H (1990b) Die Aufbereitungstechnik des Bodenwesens. Aufbereitungs-Technik 31:656--662 NeeBe T, Grohs H (1991a) Waschen und Klassieren kontaminierter BOden. Aufbereitungs-Technik 32:72-77 NeeBe T, Grohs H (1991b) Fest/fltlssig-Trennung filr die Entsorgung in Bodenwaschanlagen. Aufbereitungs-Technik 32: 294-302 NeeBe T, Feil AU, Schricker B (1997) Washability curves for contaminated soil. Proc XX. Int Mineral Processing Congr, Aachen, Gennany, 21-26 Sept Schricker B ( 1999) Intensivierung der Attrition bei der physikalisch-chemischen Sanierung kontaminierter mineralischer Abfiille. PhD-Thesis, Universitlit Erlangen-Ntlmberg, Gennany Tiefel H, Schricker B, NeeBe T (1999) Hochleistungsattrition zur mechanischen Reinigung von mineralischen Roh- und Reststoffen. Technische. Aufbereitungs-Technik 40 4: 160-164 Wilichowski M, Werther J (1996) Mathematische Modellierung von NaBaufschluB, Siebung und Hydrozyklontrennung bei der physikalischen Reinigung mineral61-kontaminierter BOden. Aufbereitungs-Technik 37: 87-96 Wilichowski M (1994) Aufbereitung mineral6lkontaminierter BOden durch Bodenwiische und Flotation. PhD-Thesis, TechnischeUniversitlit Hamburg-Harburg, Gennany

Recommended

View more >