transportation iii transportation management

42
Transportation III Transportation Manage ment Lecture 17 ESD.260 Fall 2003 Caplice

Upload: dai-townsend

Post on 03-Jan-2016

55 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Transportation III Transportation Management. Lecture 17 ESD.260 Fall 2003. Caplice. Transportation Management. Questions Differ Based on Timeframe. Approaches Differ Based on Timeframe. Technologies Differ Based on Timeframe. Unified Planning & Execution Process. Transportation Planning. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transportation III  Transportation Management

Transportation III Transportation Management

Lecture 17ESD.260 Fall 2003

Caplice

Page 2: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

2

Transportation Management

Page 3: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

3

Questions Differ Based on Timeframe

Page 4: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

4

Approaches Differ Based on Timeframe

Page 5: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

5

Technologies Differ Based on Timeframe

Page 6: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

6

Unified Planning & Execution Process

Page 7: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

7

ObjectiveEstablish primary transportation modes, contract types, routing options to minimize total expected landed cost

Key PointsPhysical network (suppliers, plants, distribution centers) is likely already fixedPlan is run annually with quarterly tweaksTransportation plan limits what you can do in executionApproximate approaches are acceptable, but we have lots of time so why not optimize . . . .

Transportation Planning

Page 8: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

8

Mode Choice Criteria Feasibility Service StandardsLength of HaulProduct CharacteristicsShipment Characteristics

Trade-offs betweenService vsCostInventory vsTransportation

Additional ChoicesTypes w/in Modes, e.g. Trucking

TruckloadLess-than-TruckloadParcelExpedited versus Standard

Intermodal/ Multi-ModalDual-Mode Strategies

Air & OceanIM & TruckLTL & TLAir & Parcel

Decisions –Mode Choice

Page 9: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

9

Modal Shares 2001

Page 10: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

10

Modal Shares 1975 -1999

Page 11: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

11

Decisions –Contract TypeWhat type of relationship do you need to establish with your carriers?Continuum of relationships from one-off to ownership

Ownership of Assets versus Control of AssetsResponsibility for utilizationOn-going commitment / responsibilitiesShared Risk/Reward –Flexible contracts

Page 12: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

12

Decisions –Routing OptionsStrategic plan establishes the potential options that can be taken in execution

Network Consolidation Archtypes

Page 13: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

13

Transportation Routing Options

Page 14: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

14

Transportation Routing Options

Page 15: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

15

Transportation Routing Options

Page 16: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

16

Transportation Routing Options

Page 17: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

17

Transportation Network Strategies

Page 18: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

18

Transportation Modeling

Page 19: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

19

Transportation Modeling

Page 20: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

20

Transportation Modeling

Page 21: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

21

Three Layers of Networks

Page 22: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

22

Transportation ModelingTransportation Options

Carrollton ISO tanks can move via truck or rail to Charleston or SavannahKingsport ISO tanks can move via truck or rail to either Norfolk or CharlestonEach port has two sailing schedule options to Rotterdam

Transportation ModesEach mode is modeled with:

Variable & fixed costsService and capacity levelsSailing schedules (day of week or fixed day)

Potential Scenarios Run each company separately (Baseline)Run combined operations (leverage volume discount out of Charleston)Introduce new security process at ports –impact of a one day delayRelax delivery windows (measure potential cost reduction)Force a 2 port solution (minimize risk of port closure)Force an all bulk truck solutionExplore option of running a dedicated fleet for line haul or drayageIncrease demand by 20% on certain lanes

Page 23: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

23

Transportation Modeling

Page 24: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

24

Task: ProcurementMultiple Levels of Procurement

StrategicLooking at entire or large portions of networkDetailed analysis –value focusedEncourages use of sophisticated carrier proposalsConsiders trade-offs between service and cost

Tactical Collecting rates for some lanes from a few carriersMinimal analysis –efficiency focusedNo sophisticated proposals from carriers

ExecutionCollecting spot rates for a specific loadPrivate / public exchangesConsidered component of execution system

Page 25: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

25

Task: ExecutionMove products from initial origin to final destination is most cost effective manner while meeting service standardsMost shippers use software systems (Transportation Management Systems)TMS works within strategic plan, procured carriers, and real-time information

PLAN: Create Shipments from OrdersEXECUTE: Select and tender to CarriersMONITOR: Visibility of the status of ShipmentsRECONCILE: Audit invoices and pay for Transportation

Page 26: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

26

How Does a TMS Generate Value?

VisibilityImproved communications efficiency with all trading partnersReduced levels of safety stock inventory.What is the current status of your PO’s/orders/shipments?

AutomationReduces resources, cost, and time to accomplish activitiesAllows user to manage the exceptions Minimizes maverick/rogue behavior and human error

Decision SupportProvides dramatic cost reductions and efficiency gainsMake the ‘business optimal’ decision at every stage of the processAssist logistics professionals in making decisions

Page 27: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

27

Execution ConsiderationsConsiderations

How do orders drop? Batched vs Continuous?How much time is allowed between drop and must-ship? Weeks? Days? Hours? Minutes? What percentage of orders change after release? How do they change? Quantity? Mix? Destinations? Timing?What is the length of haul? How many orders are “in play” at any time?

Key Decision Support DecisionsCarrier Selection

Routing and RatingRouting Guide ComplianceContinuous Moves

Consolidation & RoutingPostponement of shipments in time Vehicle consolidation (LTL to TL, Parcel to LTL)

Page 28: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

28

Page 29: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

29

Carrier Selection

Page 30: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

30

Approaches Must Be Linked

Page 31: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

31

Note on Rating vs RoutingSeparation of Rating Engine and Routing Guide

Older systems do not make this distinctionCarrier selection (routing guide) hardwired into rating engineLimits the flexibility and potential new carrier options

Page 32: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

32

Consolidation & RoutingFind lowest cost routing of orders through consolidation in time, on vehicle, or through facilities. Most TMS software contains consolidation or optimization modules

Page 33: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

33

Multiple Vehicle Scheduling Algorithm

Page 34: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

34

Optimal Routing Solution

Page 35: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

35

Heuristic Approach –SavingsClarke-Wright Algorithm

Page 36: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

36

Heuristic Approach –Cluster & Sweep

Page 37: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

37

Heuristic Approach –Cluster & Sweep

Page 38: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

38

Heuristic Approach –Cluster & Sweep

Page 39: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

39

Heuristic Approach –Cluster & Sweep

Page 40: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

40

Heuristic Approach –Cluster & Sweep

Page 41: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

41

Regardless of ApproachRules of Thumb

Good routes are "rounded", not "star shaped“Good routes don't cross themselves or othersGood sectors are "pie shaped", not "checker board“Good solutions "look like a daisy“

Good Practice TipsAlways use a Preview-Analyze-Review methodologyPeriodically visit the internal logic within the TMSNever discount the salty expert who has been doing this longer than you’ve been aliveIdentify all special conditions (customer A must be delivered to first) and then validate or reject them

Page 42: Transportation III  Transportation Management

MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics - ESD.260

42

Questions