transportation (55-00-00)

121
Transportation (55-00-00) Project Summary Chart STATE CAPITAL FUNDS Project Name $ Prior to FY 2001 FY 2001 FY 2002 Request FY 2002 Recommended FY 2003 Request FY 2004 Request 1. Program Development $ 3,000,000 $ 3,350,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 2. System Preservation 65,542,000* 73,885,000 59,839,000 59,839,000 58,803,000 55,238,000 3. System Management 32,695,000* 39,452,000 49,749,000 49,749,000 44,735,000 41,771,000 4. System Expansion 39,454,000* 104,937,000 33,216,000 33,216,000 25,852,000 9,675,000 5. Engineering & Contingencies 7,680,000* 7,828,000 6,136,000 6,136,000 4,872,000 5,343,000 6. Suburban Street & Drainage 18,550,000* 18,550,000 18,550,000 18,550,000 18,550,000 18,550,000 7. Municipal Street Aid 6,000,000* 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 8. Reserve Account 1,660,000 3,852,000 4,650,000 4,650,000 Total $ 174,581,000 $ 257,854,000 $ 181,140,000 $ 181,140,000 $ 161,812,000 $ 139,577,000 *Due to the on-going basis of these appropriations, only the FY 2000 appropriation is reflected.

Upload: others

Post on 20-Nov-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Transportation(55-00-00)

Project Summary Chart

STATE CAPITAL FUNDS

Project Name$ Prior toFY 2001 FY 2001

FY 2002Request

FY 2002Recommended

FY 2003Request

FY 2004Request

1. Program Development $ 3,000,000 $ 3,350,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000

2. System Preservation 65,542,000* 73,885,000 59,839,000 59,839,000 58,803,000 55,238,000

3. System Management 32,695,000* 39,452,000 49,749,000 49,749,000 44,735,000 41,771,000

4. System Expansion 39,454,000* 104,937,000 33,216,000 33,216,000 25,852,000 9,675,000

5. Engineering &Contingencies

7,680,000* 7,828,000 6,136,000 6,136,000 4,872,000 5,343,000

6. Suburban Street &Drainage

18,550,000* 18,550,000 18,550,000 18,550,000 18,550,000 18,550,000

7. Municipal Street Aid 6,000,000* 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000

8. Reserve Account 1,660,000 3,852,000 4,650,000 4,650,000

Total $ 174,581,000 $ 257,854,000 $ 181,140,000 $ 181,140,000 $ 161,812,000 $ 139,577,000

*Due to the on-going basis of these appropriations, only the FY 2000 appropriation is reflected.

TRANSPORTATION55-00-00

1. Program Development (74/00) $3,000,000

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION

Funding is requested to continue to develop efforts to identify and definetransportation needs and develop transportation solutions to meet those needs. Thisincludes area studies, travel demand modeling, feasibility studies, alternate modeand alternate analysis, and location and environmental studies.

For Fiscal Year 2002, funding is requested for corridor improvement studies in andaround the following areas:

- Camden, Harrington and Laurel truck routes;

- Wilmington Studies;

- Southern New Castle County Rural Roads and Completion of US 301

- Sussex County Corridor Routes

- Central Pencader Rural Roads, New Castle County

- SR 41, Lancaster Pike, Yorklyn to Valley Road, Hockessin

- SR 71 and Howell School Road

- Choptank and Carter Roads

2. System Preservation (75/00) $59,839,000

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION

Funding is requested to replace heavy equipment and vehicles; bridgerepair/replacement; pavement resurfacing; rehabilitation of existing DelDOTsupport facilities; and other major maintenance or reconstruction activities tomaintain the existing transportation network in a good state of repair. Among themost significant projects are:

- Continuing to rehabilitate bridges at a rate of 20 per year

- Continuing the enhanced paving and paving rehabilitation programs begunin Fiscal Year 1998 to support reaching the Department’s goal of 85%pavements rated good/excellent by the end of CY 2001.

- Conversion of tar and chip roads to hard surface roads in Kent and Sussexcounties.

- Purchase of replacement transit vehicles

- Acquire replacement equipment in Highway Operations sufficient to bringthe overall economic age to 6.0 years by the end of Fiscal Year 2002

TRANSPORTATION55-00-00

3. System Management (76/00) $49,749,000

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION

Funding is requested for infrastructure investments including adding turn andacceleration and deceleration lanes; making safety improvements to intersectionsand travelways in response to actual accident histories or the identification ofhazards; improved commuter services along existing corridors or transit routessuch as park and ride lots; corridor preservation purchases to preclude erosion ofexisting roadway capacities; installing traffic control devices; pedestrian/bikeways;retrofitting existing travelways to meet revised or minimum standards ofconstruction, functionality, or safety; Transportation Enhancements program(program funded as a condition of federal aid through TEA-21) to address non-traditional transportation improvements; and major technology enhancements suchas vehicle video security, ticket vending machines, voice bus stop announcementsystems; variable message signs, and global positioning signs. For Fiscal year2002, recommended projects include:

- the fourth year of dedicated funding for Intelligent TransportationManagement System (ITMS) components, adaptive and “smart”communications systems along selected corridors statewide; trafficmanagement; radio communication improvements for DelDOT vehicles;

- Continued support for Churchman’s Crossing improvements withconstruction of multi-modal improvements including sidewalks, bikepaths, transit, ITMS components and greenway improvements;

- US 40 corridor improvements including construction of multi-modalimprovements including Church Road and begin design and right of wayacquisitions for improvements for the for the completion of Phase I asdecided by consensus of US 40 Corridor working group;

- Corridor preservation advanced acquisition of rights of way for US 13,US 113, SR 48, SR 1, (South of Dover and US 301;

- Construction of the Wilmington Transit Center from Market Street toWalnut Street, Browntown pedestrian walkways and the last phase of theWilmington Riverwalk at the Peterson Wildlife Preserve;

- Continue support for SR 1 grid improvements

- Construction of intersection improvements at the SR 24 and SR 5 area atLong Neck

TRANSPORTATION55-00-00

4. System Expansion (77/00) $33,216,000

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION

Funding is requested to continue projects that increase capacity to the existingtransportation network according to the growth strategies outlined in the LongRange Plan for Transportation. Projects include rolling stock (and relatedparts/equipment/facilities) to support new or expanded transit services; increasedcapacity within highway corridors, including new travel lanes along an existingcorridor or new roads/bridges along a completely new corridor; new or expandedintermodal terminals, centers or facilities; and new facilities for multimodal centers.For Fiscal Year 2002, recommended projects include:

- Construction of a new bridge on Churchman’s Road over I-95;

- Right of way acquisition for SR 141 improvements over the Brandywine;

- Port of Wilmington infrastructure improvements;

- Begin design improvements on SR 1 at Thompsonville in Kent County;

- Begin design and property acquisition for interchange at SR 1 and SR 16in Sussex County;

- Begin the second year of the Wilmington Transit Connector/Trolley inpreparation of planned construction completion and operation inCY 2004.

5. Engineering and Contingencies (57/00) $ 6,136,000

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION

Funding is requested to serve a number of general purposes: 1) providing the statematch for the federal highway planning and research; 2) contingency for project-related expenses that cannot be absorbed within project accounts and projectcontingencies; 3) contractor claims; and 4) continuation of department-wide effort tomigrate from the current mainframe based information system to a client-serverbased information system.

6. Suburban Streets and Drainage (56/00) $18,550,000

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION

Funding is for the General Assembly to improve the approximately 1,000 miles ofsuburban streets and other miscellaneous improvements.

TRANSPORTATION55-00-00

7. Municipal Street Aid (71/00) $ 6,000,000

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION

Funding is requested to aid municipalities for the cost of roadway maintenance.This includes drainage; reconstruction, rehabilitation and repaving of streets;or other transportation related expenses for which they bear full maintenanceresponsibility. The funding level for each municipality is based on populationand the amount of road miles each municipality maintains.

8. Reserve Account (71/00) $ 4,650,000

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION

Funding is requested for bond issuance costs and necessary reserves.

TRANSPORTATION55-00-00

Title Activity FundTotalCost

State$ Auth.

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTTTF Authorization Needed 3,000FHWA Authorization 3,480FTA Authorization 319

SYSTEM PRESERVATIONBridge Preservation Program Co St/Fed 7,704 2,851BR 1 on Rising Sun Road over Brandywine Creek R/W State 25 25BR 1B on Kennett Pike over Railroad Co St/Fed 790 18BR 9 on N221 over Brandywine Creek Co St/Fed 1,400 138BR 26 on Foulk Road over Naaman's Creek Co St/Fed 367 90BR 66 on Breck's Lane Co St/Fed 0 13BR 89 on Snuff Mill Road Co St/Fed 300 60BR 91 on Snuff Mill Road R/W, Co St/Fed 310 70BR120 on SR 82 over Red Clay Creek Co St/Fed 1,120 18BR137A on K137 over Duck Creek, Clayton R/W State 17 17BR156A on K156 over Fork Branch Co St/Fed 200 40BR174 on Hillside Road Co St/Fed 600 89BR182 on Faulkland Road over Hyde Creek R/W, Co St/Fed 315 75BR210 on K208 over Shades Branch, South of Marydel R/W, Co St/Fed 703 147BR229B on Kirkwood Highway over White Clay Creek Co St/Fed 909 189BR237 on S 46 over Gravelly Branch, Seaford R/W, Co St/Fed 1,062 248BR245 on Harmony Road over Amtrak Co State 720 -BR348A, on Postles Corner Road Co State 300 202BR350 on S 72 over Raccoon Spillway, Laurel R/W, Co St/Fed 890 191BR358W on Pulaski Highway over Belltown Run Co State 550 482BR365 on US 13 over Records Pond, East of Laurel R/W, Co St/Fed 1,108 222BR407A at Silver Lake Co State 300 300BR447 on S 54 over Black Water Ditch, East of Dagsboro Co St/Fed 400 80BR474 on Delaney's Road over Paw Branch R/W, Co St/Fed 232 59BR526 and 527 on S326 at Betts Pond Co State 1,200 572BR586 on SR 265 over Pokemoke River, North of Gumboro Co State 344 344BR636 on Kirkwood Highway and BR253 on Old Capital Trail R/W, Co St/Fed 750 190BR688 on South Market Street over Christina River PE State 200 200BR712B on I-95 at Service Area, Newark Co St/Fed 400 40BR815N on SR 1 NB over Waples Pond R/W, Co St/Fed 1,036 215Environmental Improvements State 1,210 1,210Equipment Replacement PRO State 6,960 6,960Grubb Road Drainage, Naaman's Road to Foulk Road Co St/Fed 2,050 410I-95, Wilmington Viaduct to US202 PE/R/W/C St/Fed 11,250 1,970Materials & Minor Contracts State 1,096 1,096Operations Facility Improvements Co State 691 691Other System Preservation Projects Co St/Fed 1,500 700Pavement Rehabilitation PE/Co St/Fed 16,290 5,178Pavement Resurfacings Co State 24,000 24,000Rail Preservation State 2,039 2,039Slope Stabilization, SR 82 from Old Public Rd to Yorklyn Rd, Co St/Fed 1,480 163SR141, North of US 13 from Delaware Ave. to Jay Drive R/W State 455 455Transit Facilities Improvements State 395 395Transit Vehicle Replacement PRO St/Fed 5,350 2,014US113, MD State Line to North of Dagsboro Co St/Fed 15,614 5,374

TRANSPORTATION55-00-00

Title Activity FundTotalCost

State$ Auth.

TTF Authorization Needed 59,840Reprogramming -FHWA Authorization 50,510FHWA Advanced Construction Payback 7,900FHWA Discretionary 4,400FTA Authorization 2,962FTA Advanced Construction Payback -FTA Discretionary -Other $ -

SYSTEM MANAGEMENTBrackenville Road, SR 48 to Barley Mill Road PE/R/W State 800 800Camden / Wyoming Truck Route Railroad Improvements PE State 72 -Choptank Road, N 15 top N455 PE State 700 440Churchman's Crossing Corridor Improvements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 9,622 4,966Corridor Preservation and Advanced R/W Acquisition R/W State 5,100 5,100Governor's Avenue, Webb's Lane to Water Street PE State 400 400Integrated Transportation Management System PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 5,300 1,060Intermodal/Multimodal Transportation Improvements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 5,278 4,158Intersection Improvements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 625 225Loockerman Street, Queen Street to State Street PE State 42 42Milton Truck Route from SR 5 to SR 30 LOC/PE State 282 282Other System Management Projects to be identified PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 2,600 514Rail Crossing Safety Co St/Fed 725 163S298 and S299 rehabilitation and safety improvements LOC/PE State 50 50Safety Improvements - HSIP Program PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 1,889 189Southern New Castle County roadway improvements PE/R/W/Co State 1,400 -SR 1, Corridor Improvements, Kent County PE State 150 129SR 1, Corridor Improvements, Sussex County PE St/Fed 263 -SR 1, Dewey Beach Improvements from Salisbury Street to R/W State 985 985SR 1, Grid Improvements, Rehoboth Avenue to 5 Points PE State 900 -SR 24 and SR 5, Long Neck, Intersection improvements Co St/Fed 1,466 331SR 26, Assawoman Canal to US113 PE/R/W/Co State 1,450 1,450SR 41, Yorklyn Road to Valley Road PE State 485 360SR896 and SR 4 Intersection improvements PE State 32 32Sussex East/West Corridor route improvements PE/R/W/Co State 3,000 3,000Traffic Calming Program PE/R/W/Co State 400 400Transit Access - Passenger Facilities PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 1,069 829Transit Bus Equipment PE/R/W/Co State 395 395Transportation Enhancements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 4,000 800US 40 Corridor Improvements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 12,565 8,751Walker Road, Kenton Road to Saulsbury Road R/W State 800 800Wilmington Riverfront PE/R/W/Co State 13,105Wilmington Traffic Calming PE/R/W/Co 3,576 193

TTF Authorization Needed 79,526Reprogramming -FHWA AuthorizationFHWA Advanced Construction Payback -FHWA Discretionary -FTA Authorization 59FTA Advanced Construction Payback -FTA Discretionary -Other $ 540

TRANSPORTATION55-00-00

Title Activity FundTotalCost

State$ Auth.

SYSTEM EXPANSION

Churchman's Crossing Transit Facilities - Intermodal Rail Co State 6,454 6,454Churchman's Crossing Corridor / Bridge PE/Co St/Fed 70 70Corridor Capacity Improvements - Sussex County PE State 165 165Port of Wilmington State 15,000 15,000Other System Expansion projects to be identified PE/R/W/Co State 3,124 1,524SR 1 / SR 16 Interchange PE/R/W St/Fed 1,510 742SR 1 / Thompsonville Interchange PE St/Fed 1,000 200SR 1, Grid Improvements, SB 3rd Lane, SR 24 to 5 Points ENV/PE State 1,424 540SR 1, South of Dover to C&D Canal PE/Co St/Fed 2,720 591SR141 / US202, Area Wide Improvements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 24,541 -SR141, Kennett Pike to US202, Tyler McConnell Bridge PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 8,000 4,166Transit Facilities - Statewide PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 365Transit Vehicle Expansion PRO St/Fed 6,238 2,979Wilmington Transit Connector PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 6,010 420

TTF Authorization Needed 77,621 33,216Reprogramming -FHWA Authorization 11,498FHWA Advanced Construction Payback 24,905FHWA DiscretionaryFTA Authorization 203FTA Advanced Construction Payback -FTA Discretionary 6,864Other $ 784

ENGINEERING AND CONTINGENCIES 6,136

SUBURBAN STREETS 18,550

MUNICIPAL STREET AID 6,000

NEW PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION NEEDED

RESERVE ACCOUNT 4,650

TOTAL NEW CAPITAL (TTF) AUTHORIZATION

ALL $ X 1,000

ABBREVIATIONS NOTE:Co (Construction)PRO (Procurement)ENV (Environment)PE (Preliminary Engineering)R/W (Right – of – Way)TR (Traffic)

BRIDGE PRESERVATION PROGRAM

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Bridges that are identified through the bridge management system for replacement or rehabilitation are addressed through thisprogram. Program elements include repair/replacement of structurally deficient bridges; bridge painting; bridge scour; the bridge inspection program; bridge deck preservation;and underwater bridge repairs. The program is sized to permit 120 structurally deficient bridges to be reconstructed/rehabilitated over the six-year period. As individual bridgeprojects are identified, they are listed as separate projects in the CIP and funds deducted from this program.

The sign inspection program will inventory and inspect all state-owned sign structures, high mast lighting, and traffic signal supports. During the initial inventory inspection ofthe structures, an inspection interval will be assigned based on the structure’s condition, not to exceed five (5) years. Based on these intervals, schedules to perform theinspections will be developed. The goal of the program is to inventory all of the structures within five (5) years, maintaining a 95% on-time rate based on these schedules.Funding to address deficiencies identified through the inspection plan is provided within materials and Minor Contracts.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge priority rating system is based on deficiency ratings, which are updated annually to target specific bridges forrepair/rehabilitation/construction.

County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

INDIVIDUAL EST. COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 2,851 5,125 6,381 15,942STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT 80% FHWA 74,581 1,862 6,719 16,000 48,000

100% ST 6,602 2,764 838 1,700 1,50080%FHWA 4,500 4,500

DESIGN FOR NEW BRIDGES 100% ST 5,266 966 1,300 1,500 1,50080% FHWA 4,500 4,500

PAINTING 100% ST 574 57480% FHWA 14,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,000

SIGN STRUCTURE PROGRAM 80% FHWA 4,228 604 604 604 604 1,812

SCOUR 100% ST 249 24980% FHWA 1,800 300 300 300 900

INSPECTION & MGT 80% FHWA 5,875 1,875 2,000 2,000

DECK PRESERVATION 100% ST 4,900 700 700 700 700 2,100

UNDERWATER REPAIR 100% ST 629 29 100 100 100 300

All $ X 1,000

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:

1. Wetland mitigation monitoring requirements typically include 20-year site management/assessment to assure successful creation of wetland resources created as impactcompensation for various capitol projects. Monitoring typically requires monthly hydraulic data collection, fall site sampling for vegetation assessment, annual reports forfive years and then summary reports at the 10, 15,and 20 year marks. The funding estimate also includes a contingency for site remediation that may include: additionalfertilization, seeding, planting, and site re-grading as necessary to assure the establishment of a viable wetland plant and hydrologic characteristics.

2. Specific mitigation projects now underway include:• SR 1 Dover - Smyrna, nine individual sites, 324 acres,

seeding/monitoring• Ogletown mitigation, three sites, 18 acres, final planting, monitoring• First State Boulevard, one site, 2.5 acres, monitoring/fertilization• US113 Georgetown to Milford, one site 100 acres, monitoring

• SR 1 northern segments seven sites 160 acres, monitoring• Scarborough Road, one site six acres, monitoring• Porter Road, one site, 12 acres, monitoring• SR 48, one site, 1.6 acres, monitoring• Naamans Road, five sites, one acre, monitoring

3. A contingency for environmental remediation is also provided to permit unforeseen environmental problems to be addressed as they are identified.

4. Archeological data analyses and report preparation time frames frequently extend beyond completion of the capital project for which the archeological compliance wasmandated. This project element provides for: data analysis, report preparation, publication, and a contingency for follow through with human remains notification andreburials associated with this requirement. Current specific archeological elements include:

• Ogletown Interchange• US113 Georgetown to Milford, data analysis report

• SR 1 southern segments - Scarborough Road• Porter Road

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Permits DelDOT to comply with environmental and cultural laws and regulations as projects are implemented.

County: StatewideProgram Category: System Preservation

INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT EST COST TO FUNDING 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,210 1,210 1,200 7,300

Environmental Improvements 4,800 100% ST 800 800 800 2,400SR141 at Newport 4,000 100% ST 4,000UST Cleanup/Future Replacements 1,100 100% ST 500 100 100 100 300Wetland Mitigation, 1,420 100% ST 800 160 160 150 150Archeology 1,150 100$ ST 250 150 150 150 450

All $ X 1,000

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Systematic equipment replacement program for long life light and heavy equipment used by the department to carry out maintenanceand construction jobs. Graders, front-end loaders, rollers, dump trucks, street sweepers, four wheel drive vehicles, pickup trucks and sewer flushers are typical pieces ofequipment.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: As time passes, the maintenance costs for capital assets tend to rise. And, as these assets near the end of their useful lives, these maintenancecosts can become prohibitive. This reality has given rise to the concept of economic life, or the age beyond which it is more economical to replace an asset than it is tocontinue to try and maintain it. A common management practice in private industry the department applies this simple concept to the management of its equipmentreplacement program. In doing so it has established economic life benchmarks for each and every equipment class in its over 2,100 item major equipment inventory andschedules replacements accordingly. If the department does this on a routine basis, it should be managing an inventory that – taken as a whole – has a composite average agewhich is equal to composite average economical half-life of its entire inventory. At the end of FY 1999, as a result of years of under-investment, the actual average age of theequipment inventory was 9.0 years versus a target half-life target of 4.6 years. To correct this imbalance the department, in FY 2000, began a phased program to bring theactual half-life to target by the end of FY 2003. The interim age targets as the department moves forward are shown below:

Fiscal Year Average AgeGoal

Average AgeActual

1993 N/A 11.5 years1999 N/A 9.5 years2000 8.0 goal 8.0 years2001 7.5 goal2002 6.0 goal2003 4.6 goal

County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT EST COST TO FUNDING 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 6,960 8,117 6,073 18,219

Highway Equipment Replacement Program 37,736 100% ST 656 6,715 6,073 6,073 18,219Equipment for NPDES 245 100% ST 245Equipment for new SR 1 Section 2,044 100% ST 2,044

All $ X 1,000

MATERIALS AND MINOR CONTRACTS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE PRESERVATION

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This request expands the capability of the operating districts to maintain the State’s roadways through the development of unit pricecontracts for small to medium projects. Examples of capital repairs and minor improvements that would be funded by this program include: contracts for adding minor turnlanes at intersections; concrete pavement repairs; repair/replacement of curbs; gutters and sidewalks; traffic control devices (including those necessary for pedestrian, transitand bicycle access); rotomilling; crossover modifications; guardrail installations; and drainage improvements. Annual unit price contracts are issued for various types of workso when specific needs are identified they can be addressed quickly. These are projects and programs which require no acquisition of right of way; minimal design; no locationand/or environmental studies or permits; and are administered by the maintenance districts. As standalone projects are identified, they will be listed as separate projects in theCIP and funds will be deducted from this program.

$100,000 per year is authorized for sign structure, high mast lighting, and traffic signal support replacement identified as necessary by the Sign Structure Inspection Program.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Funding is provided to address minor capital problems throughout the year at the maintenance district level.

County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007FUNDING INDIVIDUAL COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

PROJECT IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJSEGMENTS TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 1,096 708 715 1,750100% ST Materials & Minor Contracts 2,410 160 450 450 450 900100% ST NPDES 1,418 395 150 158 165 550100% ST Traffic Structure Replacement 700 100 100 100 100 300

100% ST Drainage ProgramBowers Beach Improvements - North 255 255Saulsbury Road 220 220Greenspring Road and VanDyke Road 176 176

All $ X 1,000

OPERATIONS FACILITIES

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND COST ESTIMATES

INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 691 0 0 0DelDOT Main Headquarters

Administration Building/ Laboratory 100% ST 9,565 9,565Replace/Upgrade testing equipment 100% ST 30 30

North DirstrictSalt Storage 100% ST 100 100Kiamensi yard improvements 100% ST 621 291 330Kiamensi privacy barrier 100% ST 50 50Talley – Storage facility 100% ST 75 75Tybouts Corner – Salt storage facility 100% ST 50 50Tybouts Corner – Area office building 100% ST 200 200Finish equipment sheds and site planrequirements

100% ST 90 90

Bear, Talley & Kiamensi Bulk Oil system 100% ST 70

ExpresswaysChapman Road – Equipment for trucks 100% ST 269 269I-95 Toll Admin facility – Security fates andbarrier

100% ST 75 75

I-95 Toll Admin. Facility – New water systems 100% ST 135 135

Central DistrictHarrington – Salt/Sand storage structure 100% ST 135 135Middletown & Magnolia security fence 100% ST 51 51Central District – Electrical Upgrades 100% ST 64 64Magnolia – Salt/Storage Structure 100% ST 35 35

South DistrictSeaford Security fencelity – New water System 100% ST 100 100

All $ X 1,000

OTHER SYSTEM PRESERVATION PROJECTS TO BE IDENTIFIED

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Funds have been allocated in this program for those projects yet to be identified that maintain the existing transportation infrastructure.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Funds are available for additional preservation projects which may be identified through the management systems of the Department duringthe course of any particular year.

County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 700 4,364 2,700 3,73580% FHWA 6,850 1,000 1,850 1,000 3,000

100% ST 13,605 3,476 500 3,994 2,500 3,135

All $ X 1,000

PAVEMENT REHABILITATION

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: $12 million is set aside annually. As specific project scopes are developed, funds within this allocation are programmed accordingly.The roadways that are currently scheduled for major pavement rehabilitations are listed below.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To improve deteriorating poor pavement conditions throughout the State.

County: StatewideProgram Category: System Preservation

FMB ID INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR PROJECT FUNDING EST COST TO PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

PROJ # SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJIN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 5,178 4,320 4,320 7,200Other Pavement Rehabs 100% ST 7,200 PE 2,400 2,400 2,400

80% FHWA 59,750 C 3,950 600 9,600 9,600 36,000

20-063-18 SR 1, Nassau Bridge to SR 16 100% ST 250 PE 25080%FHWA 2,500 C 2,500

99-045-01 US113A, South State Street,Dover SR 10 to Webbs Lane 80% FHWA 1,630 C 1,630

99-061-11 Library Ave., Kensington Lane 100% ST 105 PE 105Lane to SR273, Newark 80% FHWA 6,500 C 6,500

99-044-03 New Linden Hill Rd.Polly Drummond Rd toSR 7 80% FHWA 4788 C 4788

99-061-16 SR 9, Kent County Line 100% ST 230 PE 230to N453 100% ST 26 R/W 26

100% ST 2,002 C 2,002

99-044-02 Terminal Ave. I-495 to SR 9 100% ST 252 PE 25280% FHWA 1,800 C 1,800

21-063-01 US113, Milford, SR1 to Sussex 80% FHWA 3,850 C 3,850County Line

All $ X 1,000

PAVEMENT RESURFACING

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Resurfacing of all State maintained roadways except for Suburban Streets. Locations for FY 2002 will be determined after the springinspection. In FY 2001, repaving of detour routes overused during the reconstruction of I-95 phase I is also being completed.

There are many types of resurfacing treatments, which may vary by materials and depth of improvement. Below are listed some of the most typical, including width ofimprovement and estimated cost per mile. In addition to these baseline estimates an additional 10% is normally added for construction engineering and/or the managementexpenses associated with a contract.

FY 2000 the Department began a $2 million per year program for conversion of surface treatment roads to hot-mix.

Treatment Width – Feet Est. Cost Per Mile $Full Width Surface Treatment 20 8,5002” Hot Mix Overlay 20 88,0002” Hot Mix Overlay with 10% Patch 20 137,3003” Hot Mix Overlay with 10’ Shoulders 20 177,1904’ Widening with 3” Hot Mix Overlay 20 168,000Total Reconstruction 1,200,000Microsurfacing – Two Courses 30,000

County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

FMB ID INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR PROJECT FUNDING EST COST TO 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

PROJ # SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJIN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 24,000 24,000 24,000 72,000Resurfacing 100% ST 154,941 22,941 22,000 22,000 22,000 66,000Surface Treatment Hot Mix Conversion 100% ST 14,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,000I-95 Paving from detour routes 100% ST 1,000 1,000

All $ X 1,000

RAIL PRESERVATION

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:

A) The State conducts programmed maintenance to sustain and upgrade the condition of State-owned rail lines. The State currently owns two active freight lines in SussexCounty. Decades of deferred maintenance by the previous owner have left these lines in a condition that threatens their continued viability and safety. Programmedmaintenance is proposed to restore these lines to a safe and economically viable condition consistent with operational viability FRA Track Class III status, which willpermit freight train speeds to increase from 10 to 40mph. This, in turn, promotes operational viability.

B) The Historic Red Clay Valley Program Grant - Matching grant (DTC share is 40%) to Historic Red Clay Valley, Inc. (Wilmington & Western Railway) for trackimprovements of rail freight.

C) Amtrak Station improvements including platform and passenger convenience areas.

D) DelDOT has agreed to pay Amtrak annually for its share of preserving the passenger line between Newark and Wilmington.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project preserves Delaware's competitive position by maintaining its current industrial and agricultural base, thereby retaining employersin the State. In addition, it can reduce truck traffic on Delaware highways, enhance highway safety, and (potentially) reduce investment in highway infrastructure. HRCVProgram Grant - State-matching grant provides funds to preserve the Wilmington & Western rail system as a means of promoting tourism and rail freight service.

County: New Castle/SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

FMB ID INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR PROJECT FUNDING EST COST TO 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

PROJECT # SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJIN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 2,039 949 949 2,847A. State Owned Line 100% ST 1,180 220 160 160 160 480

B. HRCV Maint Grant 100% ST 350 50 50 50 50 150

C. Amtrak Station Improvements 100% ST 3,500 2,410 1,090

D. Northeast Corridor Capitalization 100% ST 5,803 1,369 739 739 739 2,217

All $ X 1,000

TRANSIT FACILITIES PRESERVATION

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:

A. Wilmington Operations Complex – General repairs, including: roof repairs for body shop and administration buildings; parking lot repairs; new fire alarm in body shop;replacement of heat pump; new air compressor; and air dryer for operations building.

B. Equipment and Tools – Replace support equipment needed for fixed route and demand response vehicle maintenance. This includes engine and transmission diagnosticequipment, engine service kits, tier maintenance equipment, spare transmissions, brake lathes, hydraulic dollies, transmission jack, jib crane, portable heaters, andspecialized tools required to maintain vehicle systems.

C. Madison Street Facility Upgrades – Purchase and installation of emergency generator for facility electrical system, energy management system floor scrubber formaintenance of area, and replacement of one HVAC chiller.

County: StatewideProgram Category: System Preservation

FMB ID INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR PROJECT FUNDING EST COST TO 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

PROJECT # SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJIN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 395 98 80 120

Wilmington Operations Complex 100% ST 233 233

Equipment and Tools 100% ST 569 109 162 98 80 120

Madison Street Facilities upgrade 100% ST 139 139

TRANSIT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT AND REFURBISHMENT

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:

A. 30’ Medium Duty Buses – Purchase buses and Inspection Services in FY2003 (5) to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved Service Plan and supportingvehicle replacement schedule.

B. 30’ Heavy Duty Low Floor Buses – Purchase buses and Inspection Services FY 2002 (3) to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved Service Plan andsupporting vehicle replacement schedule.

C. 25’ Cutaway Transit Buses – Purchase buses and Inspection Services in FY 2004 (15), FY 2006 (2) and FY 2007 (2) to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTCapproved Service Plan and supporting vehicle replacement schedule.

D. 40’ Transit Buses – Purchase a combination of low floor (51) and standard floor (19) buses and Inspection Services in FY 1999 (46) and FY 2001 (24) and inspectionservices to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved Service Plan and supporting vehicle replacement schedule.

E. Intercounty Buses – Seven (7) buses in FY 1999 to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved Service Plan and supporting vehicle replacement schedule.

F. Paratransit Buses/Vans – Purchase buses and Inspection Services in FY 2001 (42), FY 2002 (30), FY 2003 (30), FY2004 (31), FY2005 (57), FY2006 (77) and FY2007(42)to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved Service Plan and supporting vehicle replacement schedule

G. Section 5310 – Program funds for organizations to provide transportation for the elderly and disabled.

H. Unicity Buses – Purchase one replacement bus biannually (City of Newark).

I. Support Vehicles –Street supervision and staff vehicles and pickup trucks to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved vehicle replacement schedule.

County: StatewideProgram Category: System Preservation

TRANSIT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT AND REFURBISHMENT (CONTINUED)

INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJSEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 2,014 2,134 2,250 21,140

A. Medium Duty Buses – Fixed Route (5) 100% ST 1,252 1,252

B. 30’ Heavy Duty Buses (3) 80% FTSA 924 924

C. 25’ Cutawasy Buses (15) 100% ST 1,287 1,28725’ Cutaway Buses (4) 100% ST 365 365

D. 40’ Transit Buses 80% FTA 2,750 2,750

40’ Buses – Cost Differential 100% ST 1,040 1,040

40’ Transit Buses (68) 80% FTA/Disc FTA 24,247 24,247

E. Intercounty Buses (1) 100% ST 47 47

F. Paratransit Buses (42) 100% ST 2,584 2,584Paratransit Buses (30) 80% FTA 2,411 2,411Paratransit Buses (30) 80% FTA 2,181 2,181Paratransit Buses (31) 80% FTA 2,321 2,321Paratransit Buses (176) 100% ST 14,334 14,334

G. Sec 16B2 (5310) Elderly and Handicapped 80% FTA 2,338 334 334 334 334 1,002Sec 16B2 (5310) Elderly and Handicapped 100% ST 2,338 334 334 334 334 1,002

H. Unicity Buses 100% ST 270 90 90 90

I. Support Vehicles 80% FTA 1,761 223 40 1,498Support Vehciles 100% ST 516 299 217

All $ X 1,000

CORRIDOR PRESERVATION AND ADVANCED ACQUISITION OF RIGHTS OF WAY

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The corridor preservation program has four main goals: maintain a road’s ability to handle traffic efficiently and safely; minimize thetransportation impacts of increased economic growth; preserve the ability to make future transportation-related improvements, as needed; and prevent the need to build anentirely new road.

In accordance with these goals, there are several techniques and methods used to preserve the capacity of a highway corridor. As part of the subdivision review process, thedepartment attempts to manage access for new development by requiring entrances onto secondary or frontage roads, as opposed to direct access on to a main highway. Whereapplicable, shared entrances are also encouraged. As part of the program, the department can purchase property access rights, development rights, or properties in whole, inorder to make needed transportation improvements or preserve the highway’s capacity. The program may also include individual improvements such as frontage roads,intersection improvements, and overpasses.

Four corridors have currently been approved: US301; SR 48, from Hercules Road to SR 41; US 13 from the Maryland line to SR 10 in Camden; and US113 from the Marylandline to Milford.

In addition to preserving capacity on selected corridors, funds are also authorized for selected early property acquisitions for proposed projects (those under programdevelopment or design) where, under current procedures, it is determined to be in the best interest of the State to purchase (protect) property subject to development and/or aproperty owner hardship is identified. This is done in cases where a project has a high probability of proceeding to construction, but has not yet proceeded to a point in designwhere finite right of way plans have been developed.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To maintain capacity along transportation corridors and to provide funding for protective buying and hardship acquisitions involving projectsunder program development or design.

County: StatewideProgram Category: System Management

INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ

SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 5,100 5,100 5,100 3,300

Rail Corridor Preservation 100% ST 700 100 100 100 100 300Highway Corridor Preservation 100% ST 18,871 3,871 5,000 5,000 5,000

Inc. US 13, US113, SR 48, SR 1, and US301 80% FHWA 17,000 2,000 15,000

All $ X 1,000

INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ITMS)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION: Integrated Transportation Management Systems (ITMS) are a multi-modal approach to improving the movement ofpeople and goods. ITMS uses modern technology (often referred to as Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)) and a Transportation Management Center (TMC, or controlroom) to monitor travel and adjust signals, signage, transit, etc. to lessen congestion. Some benefits include:

• Safer Travel – New traffic control systems can reduce the number of vehicle stops, minimize changes in vehicle speeds, and improve traffic flow -- all of which helpreduce the number of accidents.

• Less Traffic Congestion – ITMS reduces traffic jams and travel time by continuously monitoring current conditions and automatically adjusting traffic signals, freewayramp access, lane use, and transit schedules in response to real - time demand. Less traffic congestion results in safer, less stressful driving conditions.

• Better Travel Information – At home, en route, or at work, travelers will have access to real-time, accurate information about transit, train, and flight schedules, roadwayconditions, and other travel information via radio, kiosks, cable TV, internet access, and variable message signs on the bus or highway.

• Improved Inter-modal Coordination - With the help of better travel information, travelers can make better decisions as to mode choice. For example, if a traveler is awarethat his or her regular route to work is congested, he or she may opt for taking transit that particular day. Schedule and fare information provided in real-time makes trainand bus transfers more convenient. Transportation managers benefit as well, as they can maximize the system’s efficiency by coordinating their activities across travelmodes. For example, the TMC can provide buses traveling behind schedule with longer “green time” at signalized intersections to help them get back on schedule.

• Quicker Emergency Response – With monitoring equipment, the TMC may detect, verify, and respond more quickly to incidents on the State’s transportation system.Together with its emergency response partners ( i.e. Department of Public Safety, Volunteer Firemen’s Association, and Department of Natural Resources andEnvironmental Control (DNREC), the TMC can act to ensure that incidents are cleared more quickly, reducing congestion and increasing safety. In the future, travelers inneed of aid can benefit from communication and information technology which, among other things, can automatically send “mayday signals” to dispatch centers sotrained emergency staff may locate an incident more quickly. Cellular call-in programs such as #77 and motorist call boxes are also used to facilitate emergency responses.

• Reduced Costs – ITMS technology allows DelDOT to make more efficient use of its existing resources by automating functions, sharing real time information, andimproving safety. It also helps private companies through improved freight delivery. Consumers save money through more efficient travel.

INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ITMS) (CONTINUED)

The Case for Change – Delaware’s transportation system, like so many others around the nation, is experiencing a number of competing pressures and demands. DelDOTcustomers prefer a transportation system that supports, not impedes, their high standards for quality of life, including employment opportunities, a sense of community, qualityeducation and the protection of its cultural and natural resources. Funding constraints and the need for transportation to become more seamless and integrated, along with therapid development of technology to provide or enhance critical transportation improvements, have made traditional approaches to transportation awkward, difficult, costly and -- in some -- cases obsolete. Proven transportation management strategies using control, monitoring, information and communication technology can provide real solutions tothese challenging problems – saving time, saving lives and saving money.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To ensure better traffic flow throughout the State.

County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/04-6/05 7/05-6/07SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,060 634 700 2,555

Transportation Management CommunicationsStatewide 80% FHWA 3,850 550 550 550 550 3,900

New Castle County/I-95 Corridor 80% FHWA 8,147 415 1,650 950 1,283 3,849Kent County 80% FHWA 4,456 515 1,100 568 568 1,704Sussex County/Resorts Access 80% FHWA 4,450 325 1,100 605 605 1,815

Statewide ITMS Integration FHWA/DISCFHWA/ST

3,145 3,145

SR141 / US202 Area Improvements 80% FHWA 400 400

TMC Center, Smyrna 50% FHWA 6,000 6,000

DelDOT Radio/AVL 80% FHWA 6,575 3,600 500 495 495 1,485

All $ X 1,000

INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ITMS) (CONTINUED)

ITMS PROJECT AREAS NEW CASTLE COUNTY ITMS

ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty Boundaries250 Critical Miles

ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty Boundaries250 Critical Miles

WILMINGTON

NEW PORT

NEW CASTLENEW ARK

DELAWARE CITY

ODESSAMIDDLETOWN

SMYRNA

ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities

WILMINGTON

NEW PORT

NEW CASTLENEW ARK

DELAWARE CITY

ODESSAMIDDLETOWN

SMYRNA

ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities

INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ITMS) (CONTINUED)

KENT COUNTY ITMS SUSSEX COUNTY ITMS

SMYRNA

WOODSIDE MAGNOLIA

FREDERICA

HARRINGTON MILFORD

FARMINGTON

DOVER

ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities

SMYRNA

WOODSIDE MAGNOLIA

FREDERICA

HARRINGTON MILFORD

FARMINGTON

DOVER

ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities

HARRINGTON MILFORD

FARMINGTON

GREENW OOD

BRIDGEVILLE

MILTON

SEAFORD

GEORGETOW N

LEW ES

REHOBOTH

DEW EY BEACH

LAUREL

DELMAR

MILLSBORO

SELBYVILLE

SOUTH BETHANY

FENW ICK ISLAND

BETHANY BEACH

ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities

HARRINGTON MILFORD

FARMINGTON

GREENW OOD

BRIDGEVILLE

MILTON

SEAFORD

GEORGETOW N

LEW ES

REHOBOTH

DEW EY BEACH

LAUREL

DELMAR

MILLSBORO

SELBYVILLE

SOUTH BETHANY

FENW ICK ISLAND

BETHANY BEACH

ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities

INTERMODAL/MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Design and construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, transit access, park and ride facilities, traffic calming, and other non-motorized transportation projects. Projects funded from this program over the six year include -- but are not limited to -- those listed below.Additional projects will be identified over the six year period and recommended for funding by the Department’s Project Development Committee (PDC) and State MPO’s.

Transit Passenger FacilitiesPurchase and installation of bus stop pads, passenger shelters, associated lighting systems, benches, schedule display racks, trash receptacles and bus stop signs.Approximately 25% of the statewide transit system stops will be evaluated and receive upgrades annually. These upgrades can range from installation of new signs to lightedpassenger shelters and related street furniture. All new stops and upgrades will be accessible in accordance with the Americians with Disabilities Act standards. The fundingbelow will allow for installation of approximately 25 shelters, 20 benches, and 200 concrete pads annually. Projected costs for rehabilitation of paving maintenance striping ofpavement at Department-owned Park and Ride Facilities are also included, as well as the acquisition cost of right-of-way space that is required to install passenger amenities inaccordance with policy guidelines.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To enhance multimodal transportation throughout the State and encourage movement of people and goods through other than single occupantvehicles.County: StatewideProgram Category: System Management

INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ

SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 4,158 4,995 988 1,479

Traffic Calming 100% ST 1,100 PE/C 364 336 40080% FHWA 1,600 PE/C 400 1,200

• Beck’s Woods• Mifflin Road 100% ST 36 PE 36

100% ST 64 C 64

• Harvey Road 80% FHWA 850 C 850

Bicycle / Pedestrian Improvements 80% FHWA 2,386 386 2,000

• Dover Sidewalks� US 13 – South White Oak to 80% FHWA 173 PE 173

Townsend 80% FHWA 90 R/W 9080% FHWA 882 C 882

• Philadelphia Pike – Curb ramps 80% FHWA 70 PE/C 70

• SR 2/SR141, Pedestrian crossing 80% FHWA 150 PE 150Prices Corner 80% FHWA 100 R/W 100

80% FHWA 580 C 580

INTERMODAL/MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ

SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

Bicycle / Pedestrian Improvements (Continued)

• SR 72 Bikeway extension 80% FHWA 106 PE 10680% FHWA 35 R/W 3580% FHWA 385 C 385

• Paper Mill Road (SR 72) bike lanes 80% FHWA 250 PE 25080% FHWA 100 R/W 10080% FHWA 1,600 C 1,600

• Iron Hill bikeway 80% FHWA 140 PE 14080% FHWA 121 R/W 12180% FHWA 814 C 814

• Del Tech Georgetown – SR18 80% FHWA 295 C 295

• Plantations Road bike lanes 80% FHWA 55 PE 55100% ST 15 R/W 15

80% FHWA 186 C 186

• SR 1 – Extend from Salisbury Road 80% FHWA 250 PE 250Through Dewey beach 80% FHWA 1,000 C 1,000

• Christina Parkway bikeway extension 80% FHWA 44 PE 44(SR 4) 80% FHWA 163 C 163

• SR141 / US202 Area Improvements� West Side Park Improvements 100% ST 400 PE 400

100% ST 3,294 C 3,294� East Side Park Improvements 100% ST 252 PE 252

100% ST 3,194 C 3,194� East Side Wooded Pathway 100% ST 323 PE/C 323

• Wilmington Bike routes 80% FHWA 600 PE/C 600

Transit Access – Park n Ride Lots 80% FHWA 2,600 PE/R/W/C 500 300 300 300 1,200• SR 48 & Loveville Road 80% FHWA 265 C 350

Transit Passenger Facilities• Bus Stop improvements 100% ST 2,073 1,000 429 429 215• Park n Ride Repairs 100% ST 450 340 30 35 45• Right of Way acquisition 100% ST 210 70 35 105

All $ X 1,000

OTHER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECTS TO BE IDENTIFIED

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Funds have been allocated in this program for those projects identified through the Project Development Committee that will improvethe capacity of the existing transportation service and/or infrastructure without having to resort to expansion.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Funds are available for additional management projects identified through the management systems of the Department. The followingimprovements are scheduled to advance from Program Development to design as they are defined. The following table indicates the current schedule for these handoffs tobegin design work on recommended solutions.

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007• Bassett Street Intersection ------ ------------• Carter Road from Sunnyside Road to SR300 ------------ ------------• Harrington Truck Route ------------• Churchman’s Road/Airport Road intersection improvement ------------ ------• SR 15/Road 407/Road447, Milford, various improvements ------------ ------------• New Castle transportation improvements – as recommended from studies ------------ ------------ ------------• SR 41, (Lancaster Pike), Yorklyn Road to Valley Road (construction) ------------• Foulk Road 160’ North of Naaman’s Road to PA Line including shoulders ------------• Salem Church Road from I-95 to Gender Road ------------• Possum Park Road from Old Possum Park to Possum Hollow, including drainage improvements ------------

County: StatewideProgram Category: System Management

EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 514 3,974 2,343 6,38080% FHWA 48,071 2,600 3,000 9,669 31,902

100% ST 6,093 389 3,374 410

All $ X 1,000

SAFETY, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AND TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:

A. Safety Improvements: Selected safety improvements statewide. These locations are identified through the safety management program.B. Rail Crossing Safety: Selected safety improvements at highway/rail crossings throughout the State as identified by the safety management system program.C. Intersection Improvements: Minor intersection improvements statewide.D. Transportation Enhancements: Enhancements (bicycle and pedestrian, landscaping, historic restoration, etc) to existing transportation facilities. An Advisory

Committee recommends locations for this program to the Department. In FY 2001, this program was be increased from $3.4 million per year to $4.0 million per year.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:A. Federally mandated safety improvement program.B. Federally mandated safety improvement program.C. Intersections throughout the State need to be upgraded as funding permits to alleviate congestion and provide safer turning movements.D. Federally mandated program for non-traditional enhancements to transportation infrastructure and services.

County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ

SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,377 1,284 1,377 4,255

Safety Improvements - HSIP Program 90% FHWA 11,266 860 1,889 962 1,889 5,667

Rail Crossing Safety 90% FHWA 5,000 1,250 625 625 625 1,875100% ST 800 200 100 100 100 300

Intersection Improvements/Safety Improvements 100% ST 1,160 285 125 125 125 500City of New Castle - Intersections 80% FHWA 3,000 500 500 500 1,500McKinnans Church/Mill Creek - Inter.

Transportation Enhancements 80% FHWA/FTA 28,735 4,735 4,000 4,000 4,000 12,000Fox Point Park 100% ST 500 500Rehoboth Visitors Center 100% ST 250 250

All $ X 1,000

TRANSIT – BUS AND SECURITY EQUIPMENT

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:

BUS EQUIPMENT:1) Mobile Video Surveillance Equipment for fixed route public transit and

related monitoring equipment.2) Voice enunciators to provide automated (and ADA required) stop

announcements on fixed route buses.

3) Infrared passenger counters for fixed route buses to aid in route evaluationand assisting in developing federally required operational informationreporting data.

4) Operator/Maintenance Training equipment and aids.

SECURITY EQUIPMENT:1) Madison Street, Newark Station, Claymont and Churchman’s/Fairplay Station

security, including: cameras and initial system acquisition; installation ofwiring; power units; monitors; and support equipment.

2) Dover Administrative Facility cameras and equipment.

County: StatewideProgram Category: System Management

FMB ID INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR PROJECT COMPLETE FUNDING 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/05-6/07 PROJPROJ # SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

395 585Bus Equipment

Voice Enunciators 217 80% FTA 217Passenger Counters 440 100% ST 440Operator/Maint. Training Equip. & Aids

Training Aids 75 80% FTA 75

Security EquipmentMadison St, Newark Station, Claymont,Churchman’s Fairplay Station

100 100% ST 20 80

Dover Administration Facility 80 100% ST 80

Upgrade Video system on Gilleg Buses 235 100% ST 235

Upgrade Video system on 35’ Champion Buses 185 100% ST 185

Upgrade Video system on 7 low floor Gilleg Buses 35 100% ST 35

Upgrade Video system on 63 NABI Buses 365 100% ST 365

All $ X 1,000

OTHER SYSTEM EXPANSION PROJECTS TO BE IDENTIFIED

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Funds have been allocated in this program for those projects identified by the Project Development Committee (PDC) and developedthrough the Planning process, including access from SR 1, from East of Dover to the Garrison Tract, and the dualization of SR 4.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Funds are available for additional expansion projects identified through the various management systems of the Department.

County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/05-6/07

SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 1,524 2,211 2,812 3,023Other Projects to be Identified 80% FHWA 23981 2,000 2,813 10,723 8,446

100% ST 3,779 341 1,124 1,648 667 1,334

All $ X 1,000

TRANSIT FACILITIES EXPANSION, STATEWIDE

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:

Rehoboth Facilities Expansion – Design and construction of a prefabricated maintenance garage at the Rehoboth Park and Ride capable of housing a vehicle lift for chassismaintenance on 30’ buses. (Figure below includes additional $65,000 approved by PDC above the original estimate due to scope change.)

Georgetown Facility – Bus vehicle parking capacity will be augmented to support expected fleet size (and spaces lost due to bus wash construction) by expanding parkingsurface at a location either adjacent or close to the current location.

Dover Operations Facility – Construction of an alternative fuel facility for more fuel efficient buses and cleaner emmisions.

New Castle – Mid County – Land acquisition, design and construction of a satellite facility to house a portion of DTC’s New Castle County fixed route and paratransitoperations, including vehicle storage and maintenance.

SR141 / US202 Transit Hub – Construction of a transit hub in the Astra/Zeneca area.

Wilmington Operations Facility – Expansion of bus parking lots; repaving; addition of sand filters to existing lots; and replacement of structural components of the existingfacility.

Bulk Engine Oil and ATF Tanks – Bulk storage tanks for both engine oil and automatic transmission fluid to provide economies of scale in purchasing and ease of handlingby maintenance personnel.

County: StatewideProgram Category: System Expansion

TRANSIT FACILITIES EXPANSION, STATEWIDE (CONTINUED)FMB

IDINDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/05-6/07 PROJPROJ# SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 365 226 0 4,276Rehoboth 100% ST 238 238

Georgetown Facility 100% STRevenue Vehicle Parkingaugmentation

50 50

Dover Operations Facility

Access Easement 100% ST 240 R/W 240Alternative Fuel 80% FTA 693 C 693

100% ST 1,722 C 1,722

New Castle County – MidDesign 80% Disc FTA 790 PE 790Site Development 80% Disc FTA 1,079 PE 1,079Construction 100% ST 5,727 C 5,727Special Equipment 100% ST 3,198 C 3,198Interior Construction 100% ST 1,500 C 1,500Equipment Furnishings 100% ST 50 PRO 50Alternative Fuel 100% ST 2,415 C 2,415

SR141 / US202 Area Transit Hub 100% ST 340 PE 340100% ST 1,000 C 1,000

Wilmington Operations FacilityLand Acq /Demolition 100% ST 715 R/W 715Sand Filter/Gar/Doors/Repav 100% ST 175 C 175DART II Roof and Alarm Syst. 100% ST 65 C 65Replace Vehicle Maint. Lift 100% ST 226 C 226

Bulk Oil Tanks 100% ST 10 C 10

All $ X 1,000

BR 1 ON RISING SUN ROAD OVER BRANDYWINE CREEK

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitate existing steel truss members andsubstructure. Place a high performance deck overlay; make safety improvements atapproaches; and fill scour holes.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient;and currently ranks 14th on the deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 4Senatorial District: 6

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 25 200 0 0

21-074-01 100% ST 100 PE 100100% ST 25 R/W 25

80% FHWA 1,000 C 1,000

All $ X 1,000

PONDS

LA

BRANDON LA

BARTONCIR

HO

HOPETONRD MT

.VERNONAVE

TOWERRD

MTSALE

BRINKLEYAVE

VISTA DR

VISTADR

LOOKOUT DR

TOWERDR

TOWERDR

17TH RI

RED OAK RD

WILLARD ST

ROCKFORDRD

IVYRD

SIENA

OLD CHURCH

RD

RD

LEY

RD

RD

EDGEHILL

141

PENNSYLVAN

NEWPONDS

LA

BRANDON LA

BARTONCIR

HO

HOPETONRD MT

.VERNONAVE

TOWERRD

MTSALE

BRINKLEYAVE

VISTA DR

VISTADR

LOOKOUT DR

TOWERDR

TOWERDR

17TH RI

RED OAK RD

WILLARD ST

ROCKFORDRD

IVYRD

SIENA

OLD CHURCH

RD

RD

LEY

RD

RD

EDGEHILL

141

PENNSYLVAN

NEW

BR 1B ON KENNETT PIKE (SR 52) OVER RAILROAD EAST OF SR141

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The proposed improvements will replace the existingsuperstructure with prestressed concrete beams and a concrete deck. Minor safetyimprovements to the approach roadway are also included in the plans.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Superstructure is in poor conditionand the encased concrete steel beams are exposed. It is currently ranked63rd on the bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 4Senatorial District: 6

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 18 0 0 0

99-071-08 80% FHWA 790 C 790

All $ X 1,000

LATHAXTEN

LAKENSIN

GTON

W.

PLCLIVDEN

PL

CLIVDENE.

AU

GU

STA

RD

PONDS LA

WESTOVER

VE

R

RD

RD

EDGEHILLPRINCETON RD

GREENW

BRANDON LA

BAR

TON

CIR

ES

SE

XR

W.

ETO

NR

D

HOPETONRD

MT.

VER

NO

NA

VETO

WE

RR

DM

TSA

LEM

LA

BRIN

VISTA DRLOOKOUT DRTOW

ERDR

17T

DR

SA

NTO

ME

RA

TER

AM

O

LA

L A

BE

LLAN

T

CT

FAIRTHORNE LA

ORIENTE

AVE

OV

ER

BR

OO

KRD

ARLEY

DR

RM

OLD CHURCH

RD

PRESI

DEN

TIAL

DR

SENITO

RIAL

DR

CONGRESSIONAL

DR

KENT

RDSTUARTRD

RD

CECIL

BERKLEY

RD

NEW

PIK

E

PENNSYLVANIA

AVERD

141

BR 1B

LATHAXTEN

LAKENSIN

GTON

W.

PLCLIVDEN

PL

CLIVDENE.

AU

GU

STA

RD

PONDS LA

WESTOVER

VE

R

RD

RD

EDGEHILLPRINCETON RD

GREENW

BRANDON LA

BAR

TON

CIR

ES

SE

XR

W.

ETO

NR

D

HOPETONRD

MT.

VER

NO

NA

VETO

WE

RR

DM

TSA

LEM

LA

BRIN

VISTA DRLOOKOUT DRTOW

ERDR

17T

DR

SA

NTO

ME

RA

TER

AM

O

LA

LA

BE

LLAN

T

CT

FAIRTHORNE LA

ORIENTE

AVE

OV

ER

BR

OO

KRD

ARLEY

DR

RM

OLD CHURCH

RD

PRESI

DEN

TIAL

DR

SENITO

RIAL

DR

CONGRESSIONAL

DR

KENT

RDSTUARTRD

RD

CECIL

BERKLEY

RD

NEW

PIK

E

PENNSYLVANIA

AVERD

141

BR 1B

BR 9 ON SMITH’S BRIDGE ROAD (N221) OVER BRANDYWINE CREEK

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace superstructure with a one lane coveredtimber bridge. Traffic control signals are also being considered due to sight distanceconcerns.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient with poor substructure. It currently ranks 122nd on thebridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 10, 12Senatorial District: 6

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 138 0 0 0

99-071-22 80% FHWA 1,400 C 1,400

All $ X 1,000

ROCKBL

ME

ADO

WS

LA

BREEZE HILL

RDNN

ER

D

GU

MEETING RD

SMITH

SBRID

GERD

RIDGE RD

RAMSEY RD

BEAVERVALLEY RD

WOODL

100

92

BR 9

PA LINE

PA LINE

BR 9

PA LINE

PA LINE

ROCKBL

ME

ADO

WS

LA

BREEZE HILL

RDNN

ER

D

GU

MEETING RD

SMITH

SBRID

GERD

RIDGE RD

RAMSEY RD

BEAVERVALLEY RD

WOODL

100

92

BR 9

PA LINE

PA LINE

BR 9

PA LINE

PA LINE

BR 26 ON FOULK ROAD OVER NAAMAN’S CREEK

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include replacing theexisting superstructure and rehabilitating the substructure; safety improvements atthe approaches; and scour measures for the foundation.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 53rd on the bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 10Senatorial District: 5

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 90 0 0 0

20-071-09 100% ST 17 R/W 1780% FHWA 367 C 367

All $ X 1,000

R

EN RD

Y RD

WOODLAND RD

SILVERSIDE RD

MAR

SHRD

RD

GRUBB RD

GRUBB RD

SH

IPLE

YR

DS

HIP

LEY

RD

CO

NC

OR

DP

I

FOULK

RDEB

RIGH

TRD

DARLEY

RD

RD

MA

RS

HR

DM

ARSHRD

G

HARVEYRD

LEY

NAAMA

FOU

LKRD

202

202

261

92261

92

ARDEN

ARDENCROFT

ARDENTOWN

BR 26

BR 66 ON BRECK’S LANE, NORTH OF WILMINGTON

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The superstructure will be replaced with concreteslab. The existing truss will be reconstructed and reinstalled as façade. Concrete curbingwill be placed at approaches and along the length of the bridge.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and is ranked 28th on the bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 4Senatorial District: 6

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 13 0 0 0

99-071-05 100% ST 6 R/W 6100% ST 8 ENV 8

80% FHWA 230 C 230

All $ X 1,000

AU

GU

ST

AR

D

PONDS LA

WESTO

VER

WE

STO

VE

R

RD

RD

EDGEHILLPRINCETON RD

GREENWOODRD

BRANDON LA

BAR

TON

CIR

ES

SE

XR

D

ES

SEX

RD

E.

W.

PRINCETONRD

DICKENSON LA YH

OP

ETO

NR

D

HOPETON

RD

W.C

IR

MT.

VER

NO

NAV

ET

OW

ERR

DM

TSA

LEM

LA

BRIN

KLEY

AVE

VISTA DR

VIST

ADR

LOOKOUT DRTOW

ERDR TO

WER

DR

17TH

ST

ST

CLI

NTO

N

RIV

ERV

IEW

AVE

HAM

ILTO

NST

PKY

VE

RED OAK RDWILLARD ST RO

CKFO

RD

RD

IVY

RD

SIENA RD

HILL RD

WOOD

RD

GRANT AVE

LINCOLNST

SCOTTST

KENTMEREPKY

KENTMEREWAW

ASETST

WILLIAM

SON

ST

RID

DLE

A

FOSTER

PL

RELP

L

OC

KD

RMONTCHAN DR

OLD CHURCH

RD

PRES

IDEN

TIAL

DR

SENITO

RIALD

R

CONGRESSIONAL

DR

KENT

RDSTUART

RD

RD

CECIL

BERKLEY

RD

NEW

NE

TTP

IKE

PENNSYLVANIA

AVERD

141

BR 66BR 66AU

GU

ST

AR

D

PONDS LA

WESTO

VER

WE

STO

VE

R

RD

RD

EDGEHILLPRINCETON RD

GREENWOODRD

BRANDON LA

BAR

TON

CIR

ES

SE

XR

D

ES

SEX

RD

E.

W.

PRINCETONRD

DICKENSON LA YH

OP

ETO

NR

D

HOPETON

RD

W.C

IR

MT.

VER

NO

NAV

ET

OW

ERR

DM

TSA

LEM

LA

BRIN

KLEY

AVE

VISTA DR

VIST

ADR

LOOKOUT DRTOW

ERDR TO

WER

DR

17TH

ST

ST

CLI

NTO

N

RIV

ERV

IEW

AVE

HAM

ILTO

NST

PKY

VE

RED OAK RDWILLARD ST RO

CKFO

RD

RD

IVY

RD

SIENA RD

HILL RD

WOOD

RD

GRANT AVE

LINCOLNST

SCOTTST

KENTMEREPKY

KENTMEREWAW

ASETST

WILLIAM

SON

ST

RID

DLE

A

F OSTER

PL

RELP

L

OC

KD

RMONTCHAN DR

OLD CHURCH

RD

PRES

IDEN

TIAL

DR

SENITO

RIALD

R

CONGRESSIONAL

DR

KENT

RDSTUART

RD

RD

CECIL

BERKLEY

RD

NEW

NE

TTP

IKE

PENNSYLVANIAAVER

D

141

BR 66BR 66

BR 89 ON SNUFF MILL ROAD

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The existing structure will be replaced with aconcrete box culvert, with stone face parapets and wingwalks –the latter to be tapered and flared outside of the clear zone toeliminate the need for a guardrail.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 46th on the bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 12Senatorial District: 6

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 60 0 0 0

99-071-07 100% ST 20 LANSC 2080% FHWA 300 C 300

All $ X 1,000

Shad

owbr

ook

Pond

SON TRACT

RD

SELB

O

HAYWOOD RD

CHANDLE

GREGG AVE

HIG

HR

IDG

ER

D

HAYSTACK LA

STO

NET

CREE

KR

DH

EDG

ERO

WLA

FIELDLA

MEADOWLARK LA

PENTLANDDR

LANARK RD

CE

NT

ERH

IL LR

D

DOL

RD

KENNETT RD

OLD

SNUFF MILL RD

CLO

UD

ES

RD

SNUFF MILL RD

CENTERM

ILLRD

BR 89

PA LINE

PA LINE

Shad

owbr

ook

Pond

SON TRACT

RD

SELB

O

HAYWOOD RD

CHANDLE

GREGG AVE

HIG

HR

IDG

ER

D

HAYSTACK LA

STO

NET

CREE

KR

DH

EDG

ERO

WLA

FIELDLA

MEADOWLARK LA

PENTLANDDR

LANARK RD

CE

NT

ERH

IL LR

D

DOL

RD

KENNETT RD

OLD

SNUFF MILL RD

CLO

UD

ES

RD

SNUFF MILL RD

CENTERM

ILLRD

BR 89

PA LINE

PA LINE

BR 91 ON SNUFF MILL ROAD WEST OF CENTERVILLE

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The existing concrete arch is deteriorated andwill be replaced in kind, with a stone veneer parapet added; safety improvementsincluded at the bridge approaches; as well as scour protection measures for thefoundation.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 97th on our bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 12Senatorial District: 6

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 70 0 0 0

100% ST 60 PE 60100% ST 10 R/W 10

80% FHWA 300 C 300

All $ X 1,000

ME

ADO

WS

SE

LB

OR

NE

DRSYCAMORE LA

HAYWOOD RD

CHANDLER LAGREGG AVEMOUNT AIRY DR

WO

OD

SID

ED

R

HOLLY LACA

RR

IAG

EC

IR

VALLEY WAY

HISSELLLA

HIG

HR

IDG

ERD

HAYSTACK LA

NET

CRE

EKRD

HED

GER

OW

LA

FIELDLA

LARK LA

PENTLANDDRLANARK

RD

CE

NT

ER

HI LL

RD

52

CENTER MEETING

PYL

ESFO

RD

RD

D

TWA

DD

ELL

MIL

LR

D

D

KENNETT RD

OLD

MILL RD

SNUFF MILL RD

CE

NT

ER

MIL

LR

D

BURNT MILL RD

ME

ADO

WS

SE

LB

OR

NE

DRSYCAMORE LA

HAYWOOD RD

CHANDLER LAGREGG AVEMOUNT AIRY DR

WO

OD

SID

ED

R

HOLLY LACA

RR

IAG

EC

IR

VALLEY WAY

HISSELLLA

HIG

HR

IDG

ERD

HAYSTACK LA

NET

CRE

EKRD

HED

GER

OW

LA

FIELDLA

LARK LA

PENTLANDDRLANARK

RD

CE

NT

ER

HI LL

RD

52

CENTER MEETING

PYL

ESFO

RD

RD

D

TWA

DD

ELL

MIL

LR

D

D

KENNETT RD

OLD

MILL RD

SNUFF MILL RD

CE

NT

ER

MIL

LR

D

BURNT MILL RD

BR119, BR120 ON SR 82 OVER RED CLAY CREEK AND SR 82 SLOPESTABILIZATION AT WAY ROAD

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:BR119 - The proposed work includes replacing the bridge deck; patchingand sealing the substructure concrete; replacing the bridge rail andupgrading the existing guardrail.

BR120 – The project will rehabilitate the existing historic concrete archbridge while maintaining the existing geometry. Guardrails will be placedat the bridge ends to improve safety.

Slope Stabilization – The project will construct retaining structures tostabilize slopes along the roadway in the area of both bridges.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:BR119 - The bridge is structurally deficient and ranks 239th on the bridge deficiency list.(This bridge will be funded from special innovative bridge research and construction funds from Federal Highway Administration [FHWA]).

BR120 – The bridge ranks 53rd on the bridge deficiency list.

Slope Stabilization: Roadway reconstruction 50' before and after retaining wall limits and within the area of slope instability is necessary to prevent worsening safetycondition.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 12

Senatorial District: 6

EST COSTINDIVIDUALL FMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

PROJECT OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1480 163 0 0 0

Bridge 119 20-074-02 100% ST 5 R/W 580% FHWA 430 C

Bridge 120 98-074-01 80% FHWA 1,120 C

Slope Stabilization 97-007-01 80% FHWA 1,050 C

All $ X 1,000

DAWSON TRACTRD

SPR

ING

HOUS

ELA

SPR

ING

HOUS

ELA

LAR

CH

MO

NT

CT

WO

OD

V

MEADOWLARK LA

82

MT

C

ASH

LAN

DSC

HO

OL

RD

ARPLESS RDBLICRD

NRD

SNUFF MILL RD

SR

D CE

N

DAWSON TRACTRD

SPR

ING

HOUS

ELA

SPR

ING

HOUS

ELA

LAR

CH

MO

NT

CT

WO

OD

V

MEADOWLARK LA

82

MT

C

ASH

LAN

DSC

HO

OL

RD

ARPLESS RDBLICRD

NRD

SNUFF MILL RD

SR

D CE

N

PYL

ES

FOR

KE

NN

ETT

PIK

E

PYLESFORD

RD

OW

LES

NE

ST

RD

OLD

WILM AMSEY

RDB

ARLE

YM

ILLR

D

HILLSIDE MILL RD

RD

MTCUBARD

ASH

LAN

DS

CH

OO

LR

D

D

SHARPLESSRDLIC

RD

KLYN

RD

BRAC

KEN

VILL

ER

D

ETT RDSNUFF MILL

TCH

ELL

RD

82

82 82BR174BR174

BR174 ON MT. CUBA ROAD OVER RED CLAY CREEK TRIBUTARY

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include replacement of the existingrigid frame with a four-sided concrete box culvert, as well as the placement of placing riprap toprotect the foundation. Stabilization of the roadway slope near the site will also be addressed.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficientand ranks 103rd on the bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 12Senatorial District: 6

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 89 0 0 0

20-071-01 100% ST 14 R/W 1480% FHWA 228 C 600

All $ X 1,000

LISTER DR

DANDENO

GDR

IRK DR

WH

ITE

KIR

KD

RDR

ISH CT

RY DROR CT

BA

LM

OR

EL

A

BRAEMORE PL

CROSSGATES DR

CIRO CT

TRE

EL

INE

CT

NEWGATE LACONSTANCE DR ABBEY RD E

WE

STM

ON

TD

R

CHELTENGE

DR

KIMBERLY CTLD

R

TANA

SK

YLA

RK

RD

SKYLA

WAXIN

GC

T

TURNSTO

PLOVER C

KLA

ND DR

OAKL ANDDR

DUNLAP DR

HE

RB

ER

TD

R

CARILLON DR

BRISTOL DR

ADDISON DRE. KENMORE DR

WORDSWORTHDR

WORDSWORTHDR

KEMBLE CT

SHERBROOKE

DR

PAISLEYDR

YEARSLEY PLYEARSLEYDR

CO

RA

LOO

P

CHARLES RD

HA

NN

AM

RD

ROBINO DR

LERD

GLEN DR

WHEAD LA

CEDAR AVEMAPLE AVE

HA

RR

ISO

NA

VE

JAC

KS

ON

AV

E

TO

NA

VEPINE AVE

SPRUCE AVE

ELDERADR

NEWELL

DR

NEWELL

ALISTER DRALISTER

DEANDR

DEAN D

BAXTER DR

CA

NO

RA

DR

EL D

ER

DR

FE

NT

ON

DR

GR

AH

MD

R

TI

WOO

AN

GE

LD

R

MA

RLY

ND

R

WO

OD

SR

D

OA

41

SC

HU

RC

HR

D

D

DUNCANRD

FAUKLAND RD

HERCULES RD

LISTER DR

DANDENO

GDR

IRK DR

WH

ITE

KIR

KD

RDR

ISH CT

RY DROR CT

BA

LM

OR

EL

A

BRAEMORE PL

CROSSGATES DR

CIRO CT

TRE

EL

INE

CT

NEWGATE LACONSTANCE DR ABBEY RD E

WE

STM

ON

TD

R

CHELTENGE

DR

KIMBERLY CTLD

R

TANA

SK

YLA

RK

RD

SKYLA

WAXIN

GC

T

TURNSTO

PLOVER C

KLA

ND DR

OAKL ANDDR

DUNLAP DR

HE

RB

ER

TD

R

CARILLON DR

BRISTOL DR

ADDISON DRE. KENMORE DR

WORDSWORTHDR

WORDSWORTHDR

KEMBLE CT

SHERBROOKE

DR

PAISLEYDR

YEARSLEY PLYEARSLEYDR

CO

RA

LOO

P

CHARLES RD

HA

NN

AM

RD

ROBINO DR

LERD

GLEN DR

WHEAD LA

CEDAR AVEMAPLE AVE

HA

RR

ISO

NA

VE

JAC

KS

ON

AV

E

TO

NA

VEPINE AVE

SPRUCE AVE

ELDERADR

NEWELL

DR

NEWELL

ALISTER DRALISTER

DEANDR

DEAN D

BAXTER DR

CA

NO

RA

DR

ELD

ER

DR

FE

NT

ON

DR

GR

AH

MD

R

TI

WOO

AN

GE

LD

R

MA

RLY

ND

R

WO

OD

SR

D

OA

41

SC

HU

RC

HR

D

D

DUNCANRD

FAUKLAND RD

HERCULES RD

BR182 ON FAULKLAND ROAD OVER HYDE RUN SOUTHWEST OF CEDARS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements willinclude the replacement of the existing concrete deck withlightweight concrete, as well as making existing steel beamscomposite with the concrete deck. The parapet will bereconstructed to resemble the existing parapet.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 92nd on our bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 12, 19Senatorial District: 7,8

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 75 0 0 0

100% ST 60 PE 60100% FHWA 15 R/W 1580% FHWA 300 C 300

All $ X 1,000

DRM

ILBOURN

E

VA

NIE

RD

R ELMA DR

HARRIET CT

SE

IBE

RC

T

NO

NA

NTU

MD

R

NO

NA

NT

UM

DR

WIN

DS

ON

GC

IR

SH

EN

AN

DO

AHD

R

NIGHTINGALE CIR

WIL

KE

RD

EA

ND

R

LEN

AC

T

KERDEAN DR

CA

RLA

CT

WEST

T

THDR

KENNETH

AN

NA

WA

Y

DE

LRO

SE

CT

MARY

ELLA

DR

PHILLIP CT

ST.R

EG

ISD

R

RO

YC

T

CAYNOR CT

RANCH CTLER RD

MOSS CT

GLE

NV

IEW

PL

MEADOW WIND CIR

CR

EEK

BE

ND

CT

OR

C

AS

HA

ELM

AV

E DR

R S. D

MULBERRY RD

FERNCLIFF RD

HILLCROFT RD

NEWBROOK RD

AR

ON

IMIN

KD

RCH

APEL

HILL

DR

ARONIMINK DR

STREG

ISDREBERLY DR

BAL

ANG

ER

RD

EC

KE

RD

R

DECKERDR

ARON

IMINK

DR

STO

NE

YB

RA

ER

D

LAS

TLA

DE

LAP

LAN

EA

VE

DE

LAP

LAN

EA

VE

NORTH PL

ORCHARD RD

RID

GE

AVE

CA

PIT

OL

PL

BIRCH AVE

LAU

RE

LA

VE

OAK AVE ROSE

CIR

CED

AR

AVE

PO

PLA

RA

VE

BO

XW

OO

DA

VE

MA

PLE

AV

E

RO

SEC

IR

CHESTNUT AVE

D

N. DILLWYN RDD

FAIRWAY RD

CORDELE RD

CO

RD

ELE

RD

DU

NB

AR

RD

ELI Z

AB

ET

HC

T

ANDRIES RD

BIS

BE

ER

D

BISBEE CT

WAR

BREWSTER

DA

HUD

MEDILL

LA

G

72

72

APERMILL RD

POSSUM

PARK

RD

KIRKWO

DRM

ILBOURN

E

VA

NIE

RD

R ELMA DR

HARRIET CT

SE

IBE

RC

T

NO

NA

NTU

MD

R

NO

NA

NT

UM

DR

WIN

DS

ON

GC

IR

SH

EN

AN

DO

AHD

R

NIGHTINGALE CIR

WIL

KE

RD

EA

ND

R

LEN

AC

T

KERDEAN DR

CA

RLA

CT

WEST

T

THDR

KENNETH

AN

NA

WA

Y

DE

LRO

SE

CT

MARY

ELLA

DR

PHILLIP CT

ST.R

EG

ISD

R

RO

YC

T

CAYNOR CT

RANCH CTLER RD

MOSS CT

GLE

NV

IEW

PL

MEADOW WIND CIR

CR

EEK

BE

ND

CT

OR

C

AS

HA

ELM

AV

E DR

R S. D

MULBERRY RD

FERNCLIFF RD

HILLCROFT RD

NEWBROOK RD

AR

ON

IMIN

KD

RCH

APEL

HILL

DR

ARONIMINK DR

STREG

ISDREBERLY DR

BAL

ANG

ER

RD

EC

KE

RD

R

DECKERDR

ARON

IMINK

DR

STO

NE

YB

RA

ER

D

LAS

TLA

DE

LAP

LAN

EA

VE

DE

LAP

LAN

EA

VE

NORTH PL

ORCHARD RD

RID

GE

AVE

CA

PIT

OL

PL

BIRCH AVE

LAU

RE

LA

VE

OAK AVE ROSE

CIR

CED

AR

AVE

PO

PLA

RA

VE

BO

XW

OO

DA

VE

MA

PLE

AV

E

RO

SEC

IR

CHESTNUT AVE

D

N. DILLWYN RDD

FAIRWAY RD

CORDELE RD

CO

RD

ELE

RD

DU

NB

AR

RD

ELI Z

AB

ET

HC

T

ANDRIES RD

BIS

BE

ER

D

BISBEE CT

WAR

BREWSTER

DA

HUD

MEDILL

LA

G

72

72

APERMILL RD

POSSUM

PARK

RD

KIRKWO

BR229B ON KIRKWOOD HIGHWAY (SR 2) OVER WHITE CLAY CREEK

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will includethe rehabilitation of the existing steel beams and bearings; the repairof spalled areas of the pier cap and abutments; the scaling ofapproach slab cracks; as well as repair of scour holes around theexisting piers.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficientand ranks 49th on the bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 14Senatorial District: 6,11

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 189 0 0 0

21-074-04 100% ST 75 PE 75100% ST 9 R/W 9

80% FHWA 900 C 900

All $ X 1,000

CHURCHMANSR

OL

CHAPMAN RD AIRPO

RT

RD

OLDCHURCHMANS

RD

AIR

PO

RT

RD

EA

GL

ER

UN

RD

EWAR

KR

D

KIRKWOOD HWY

RED

MILL

RD

OLDHARMONY

RD

OLD

CHURCHMANS

RD

RAPHRD

AS

TO

NR

D

HE

ND

ER

SO

NR

D

K RD

OLD COACH RD

D

OGLETOWN STANTON

RD

95

58

4

58

7

27337

2

BR245BR245

CHURCHMANSR

OL

CHAPMAN RD AIRPO

RT

RD

OLDCHURCHMANS

RD

AIR

PO

RT

RD

EA

GL

ER

UN

RD

EWAR

KR

D

KIRKWOOD HWY

RED

MILL

RD

OLDHARMONY

RD

OLD

CHURCHMANS

RD

RAPHRD

AS

TO

NR

D

HE

ND

ER

SO

NR

D

K RD

OLD COACH RD

D

OGLETOWN STANTON

RD

95

58

4

58

7

27337

2

BR245BR245

BR245 ON HARMONY ROAD OVER AMTRAK

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include the rehabilitation of thebridge with an overlay of the bridge deck; replacement of deck joints; painting of steelbeams; patching and sealing the substructure concrete; and upgrading the guardrailconnections and end treatments.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andranks 322nd on the bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 14,18Senatorial District: 9,11

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 0 0 0

20-074-04 100% ST 720 C 720

All $ X 1,000

CA

RA

VE

LNN RD

PULASKI HWY

WRANGLEHILL

R

OLD PORTER RD

REDLIO

NCHURCH

RD

COUNTRYRD

SU

NS

ET

LAK

ER

D

OC

HS

BR

IDG

ER

D

REYBOLD RD OL

IRO

NH

ILLR

D

89640

71301

BR358WBR358W

CA

RA

VE

LNN RD

PULASKI HWY

WRANGLEHILL

R

OLD PORTER RD

REDLIO

NCHURCH

RD

COUNTRYRD

SU

NS

ET

LAK

ER

D

OC

HS

BR

IDG

ER

D

REYBOLD RD OL

IRO

NH

ILLR

D

89640

71301

BR358WBR358W

BR358 ON PULASKI HIGHWAY (US 40) OVER BELLTOWN RUN, BEAR

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include the replacement of theexisting culvert with a four sided box culvert; as well as the placement of riprap at theinlet and outlet. (Traffic will be maintained during construction by paving the median.)

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient and ranks 165th onthe bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 24Senatorial District: 12

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 482 0 0 0

20-071-06 100% ST 10 R/W 10100% ST 550 C 550

All $ X 1,000

SU

MM

ITB

RID

GE

RD

NOXONTOWN

RD

C D

ETOWN

WICK RD

STANNS

CHURCHRD

NOXONTOWN

RD

SILV

ER

LAK

ER

D

BR

ICK

MI LL

RD

PE

TE

RS

ON

RD

WIG

GI

ILL RD

301

299

15

ODE

MIDDLETOWN

BR407ABR407A

SU

MM

ITB

RID

GE

RD

NOXONTOWN

RD

C D

ETOWN

WICK RD

STANNS

CHURCHRD

NOXONTOWN

RD

SILV

ER

LAK

ER

D

BR

ICK

MI LL

RD

PE

TE

RS

ON

RD

WIG

GI

ILL RD

301

299

15

ODE

MIDDLETOWN

BR407ABR407A

BR407A ON SILVER LAKE ROAD, AT SILVER LAKE

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include replacement of thebridge with a concrete box culvert and sluice gate; construction of a guardrail at both bridgeapproaches; and the placement of riprap at culvert entrance and exit.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient and ranks 84th on thebridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 9Senatorial District: 14

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 300 0 0 0

20-071-04 100% ST 300 C 300

All $ X 1,000

LISA CT

SC

OT

TLA

GREEN SPRING FARM

1

15

CLAYTON DELANEY RD

SPRING RD

CL

AY

TO

NG

RE

EN

SPRIN

GR

D

D

REEN

SPRIN

GR

D

DU

CK

CR

EE

KR

D

JOE GOLDSBOROUGH

RD

LISA CT

SC

OT

TLA

GREEN SPRING FARM

1

15

CLAYTON DELANEY RD

SPRING RD

CL

AY

TO

NG

RE

EN

SPRIN

GR

D

D

REEN

SPRIN

GR

D

DU

CK

CR

EE

KR

D

JOE GOLDSBOROUGH

RD

BR474 ON DELANEY’S ROAD OVER PAW BRANCH, NORTH OF CLAYTON

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will includereplacement of the superstucture with prestressed concrete slabs;construction of a concrete deck; placement of guardrails at bothbridge approaches; and installation of riprap at the bridge abutments.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficientand ranks 96th on the deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 28Senatorial District: 14

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 59 0 0 0

21-071-01 100% ST 16 R/W 1680% FHWA 216 C 216

All $ X 1,000

HARR

ISPL

PICKW

ICK

DR

TRACYCT

NC

ISS

T

NA

CT

OODMILL DR

BA

ILEY

DR

EY DR IVANHOELA

SAXON CIR

DARNAY

LA

TAPLEYLA

SPR

ING

ERS

LAG

RIF

FIN

DR

GRIFFI

NDR

MUG

GLE

TON

RD

NICHOLBYDR

NICHOLBY DR

NICHOLB

YDR

HOLBORNRD

DORKIN

GC

T

DOMBEY DR

TWIST LA

CRATCHETT RD

MCCAWBER DR

SANDY DR

SANDY DR

SHARONDR

SHADYDR

HENDRY AVEWHITEHALL CIR

VERONADR

VERO

NADR

MO

NIC

ABLVD

KLA

IRP

L

WE

ER

CIR

DELAWARE STBEECH

OAKST

ST

CHESTNUT ST

ELMWOODCEDAR

PINE

ST

ST

PR

OS

PE

CT

ST

HI G

HLA

ND

AVE

OV

ER

LOO

K

ORCHARDRD

AV

E

GIL

BER

T

LOR

RA

ING

AR

Y AV

E

AVE

AVE

CENTER CIR

CH

ALET

JACKSON

FRANKLIN

NE

WS

T

DR

AVE

AVE

HUTCHISON RD

ON

CLAIRE

PL

RMONTECIR

FARRANDDR

WE

RI C

DR

AR

TLE

YPL

EE

RIC

DR

TR

UIT

T

BRADLEY

DR

DR

ND

PLACE

OW

EN

DR

ME

LD

R

CT

GRAYLING

LAF

AYE

FENFOWA

SH

ING

TON

ST

PE

SHERMAN AVECUMMINGS CT

DOWNING LA

MAXWELLTOWN RDHENLOPEN AVE

DIAMOND ST

RED

WO

O RO

BIN

STEA

DAVE

DEC

ALB

AVELIS

TON

AVE

TRIN

ITY

AV

EFE

NW

ICK

AV

E

ROSLYN DR

AR

LEN

ED

R TARRY LALINDALE RD

TO

WN

BE

LF

WI

WINDERMERE AVE

TEDR

RE

ES

EC

T

BA

RR

RD

FE

RG

US

ON

DR

BYRD CT

DUFF CIR

AR

MO

UR

DR

PAULSON DR

D

WALKER RD

ST. JAMES

DR

PENNDREW CTGLE

NA

VON

R RE

DMON

2

LIMESTO

NE ST

AN

TO

NR

D

HARR

ISPL

PICKW

ICK

DR

TRACYCT

NC

ISS

T

NA

CT

OODMILL DR

BA

ILEY

DR

EY DR IVANHOELA

SAXON CIR

DARNAY

LA

TAPLEYLA

SPR

ING

ERS

LAG

RIF

FIN

DR

GRIFFI

NDR

MUG

GLE

TON

RD

NICHOLBYDR

NICHOLBY DR

NICHOLB

YDR

HOLBORNRD

DORKIN

GC

T

DOMBEY DR

TWIST LA

CRATCHETT RD

MCCAWBER DR

SANDY DR

SANDY DR

SHARONDR

SHADYDR

HENDRY AVEWHITEHALL CIR

VERONADR

VERO

NADR

MO

NIC

ABLVD

KLA

IRP

L

WE

ER

CIR

DELAWARE STBEECH

OAKST

ST

CHESTNUT ST

ELMWOODCEDAR

PINE

ST

ST

PR

OS

PE

CT

ST

HI G

HLA

ND

AVE

OV

ER

LOO

K

ORCHARDRD

AV

E

GIL

BER

T

LOR

RA

ING

AR

Y AV

E

AVE

AVE

CENTER CIR

CH

ALET

JACKSON

FRANKLIN

NE

WS

T

DR

AVE

AVE

HUTCHISON RD

ON

CLAIRE

PL

RMONTECIR

FARRANDDR

WE

RI C

DR

AR

TLE

YPL

EE

RIC

DR

TR

UIT

T

BRADLEY

DR

DR

ND

PLACE

OW

EN

DR

ME

LD

R

CT

GRAYLING

LAF

AYE

FENFOWA

SH

ING

TON

ST

PE

SHERMAN AVECUMMINGS CT

DOWNING LA

MAXWELLTOWN RDHENLOPEN AVE

DIAMOND ST

RED

WO

O RO

BIN

STEA

DAVE

DEC

ALB

AVELIS

TON

AVE

TRIN

ITY

AV

EFE

NW

ICK

AV

E

ROSLYN DR

AR

LEN

ED

R TARRY LALINDALE RD

TO

WN

BE

LF

WI

WINDERMERE AVE

TEDR

RE

ES

EC

T

BA

RR

RD

FE

RG

US

ON

DR

BYRD CT

DUFF CIR

AR

MO

UR

DR

PAULSON DR

D

WALKER RD

ST. JAMES

DR

PENNDREW CTGLE

NA

VON

R RE

DMON

2

LIMESTO

NE ST

AN

TO

NR

D

BR636 ON KIRKWOOD HIGHWAY (SR 2) AND BR233 ON OLD CAPITAL TRAIL

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:

BR636 - Remove the existing (broken) concrete slab from channeland place rip-rap to fill the void.

BR233 – Remove existing concrete arch and pedestrian bridgesand construct concrete arch bridge with sidewalks on the west side.The width of the new bridge will match the width of the roadwaysection at the approaches.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

BR636 – The existing concrete channel pavement is in poor condition and repair is necessaryto prevent the undermining of the bridge foundation. The bridge ranks 100th on the bridgedeficiency list.

BR233 – The bridge is structurally deficient and ranks 82nd on the bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 19,20Senatorial District: 8

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 190 0 0 0

21-071-02 100% ST 110 PE 110100% ST 50 R/W 50

80% FHWA 700 C 700

All $ X 1,000

LOC

UST

STC

ON

NE

L

BIR

DSTNANCY CT

CO

NNE

LLS

T

ST

CHANDLER

LINDEN ST

LM ST

DOCK ST

CLA

YM

ON

TS

T

YETTE BLVD

LORD ST

CURLETT ST

6TH ST

BELL ALLEY

ROUNDHOUSE LA

AVE

NU

EO

FTH

EA

RTS

WE

ST

ST

TATN

ALL

STO

RAN

GE

ST

MARSHALL ST

WA

RN

ERS

TBRO

WN

TOW

NTRU

CKROUTE

OD 7TH ST

5TH ST

2ND ST

3RD ST

FRONT ST

ROBINSON ST

PO

PLA

R

MA

WE

ST

ST

TATN

ALL

ST

OR

AN

SH

IPLE

YST

MA

RK

ETS

T

FRE

NC

HST

LOM

BAR

DS

TP

INE

ST

KIR

BEN

BU

TTO

NW

OO

DS

T

COMMERCE ST

CA

NA

LS

T

CH

RIS

TINA

AVE

LOBDEL ST

CLA

YM

ON

TS

T

PHE

ALD

WATER ST

JUS

TIS

ON

ST

MA

DISO

NST

T OAK ST

BEECH ST

JAC

KSO

N

FRA

NK

LIN

FRA

NK

LIN H

AR

RIS

ON

VAN

BU

RE

N

COLUMBIAAVE

PO

RTE

RS

T

BU

TTO

NW

OO

DS

T

TOW

NSE

NDS

T

PEARL STD ST

C ST

B ST

A ST

A ST

PEACH STAPPLE ST

BR

AD

FOR

DST

HU

RC

HS

T

EN

ST

JAMES COURT

HOWARD ST

LOM

BA

RD

ST

SPR

UC

ES

T

MA

DI S

ON

ST

SO

UTH

ST

FOU

ND

AR

YST

BEE

CH

ST

BEECH ST

OA

KS

T

STR

OU

DST

CE

DA

RS

T

5THA

VE

6THA

VE

7THA

VE

THA

VE

HORAGE ST

BROWN ST

WRIGHT ST

COLMAN ST

NCAN ST

13

13

95

LOC

UST

STC

ON

NE

L

BIR

DSTNANCY CT

CO

NNE

LLS

T

ST

CHANDLER

LINDEN ST

LM ST

DOCK ST

CLA

YM

ON

TS

T

YETTE BLVD

LORD ST

CURLETT ST

6TH ST

BELL ALLEY

ROUNDHOUSE LA

AVE

NU

EO

FTH

EA

RTS

WE

ST

ST

TATN

ALL

STO

RAN

GE

ST

MARSHALL ST

WA

RN

ERS

TBRO

WN

TOW

NTRU

CKROUTE

OD 7TH ST

5TH ST

2ND ST

3RD ST

FRONT ST

ROBINSON ST

PO

PLA

R

MA

WE

ST

ST

TATN

ALL

ST

OR

AN

SH

IPLE

YST

MA

RK

ETS

T

FRE

NC

HST

LOM

BAR

DS

TP

INE

ST

KIR

BEN

BU

TTO

NW

OO

DS

T

COMMERCE ST

CA

NA

LS

T

CH

RIS

TINA

AVE

LOBDEL ST

CLA

YM

ON

TS

T

PHE

ALD

WATER ST

JUS

TIS

ON

ST

MA

DISO

NST

T OAK ST

BEECH ST

JAC

KSO

N

FRA

NK

LIN

FRA

NK

LIN H

AR

RIS

ON

VAN

BU

RE

N

COLUMBIAAVE

PO

RTE

RS

T

BU

TTO

NW

OO

DS

T

TOW

NSE

NDS

T

PEARL STD ST

C ST

B ST

A ST

A ST

PEACH STAPPLE ST

BR

AD

FOR

DST

HU

RC

HS

T

EN

ST

JAMES COURT

HOWARD ST

LOM

BA

RD

ST

SPR

UC

ES

T

MA

DI S

ON

ST

SO

UTH

ST

FOU

ND

AR

YST

BEE

CH

ST

BEECH ST

OA

KS

T

STR

OU

DST

CE

DA

RS

T

5THA

VE

6THA

VE

7THA

VE

THA

VE

HORAGE ST

BROWN ST

WRIGHT ST

COLMAN ST

NCAN ST

13

13

95

BR688 ON SOUTH MARKET STREET OVER CHRISTINA RIVER

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This is a double leaf drawbridge which spans the Christina River. An in-depth inspection of thestructural, mechanical, and electrical systems is being conducted. Therecommendations of this inspection will be used to designimprovements to address the problems found. Repair/rehabilitationwill be funded upon completion of the inspection/design phase throughthe Bridge Preservation Program.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This bridge is functionally obsoleteand ranks 48th on the bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 3Senatorial District: 2,3

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 200 0 0 0

100% ST 200 PE 200

All $ X 1,000

EARL'S CT

ORKNEY CTBL

VD

PEOPLES DR

DA

NTRR

IS

KA

NE

DR

PATT

GELRISA CT

LOUIS CT

JOSEPH DRFLD

AN

VE

RS

CI R D

AN

VE

RS

CI R

HA

NN

AD

R

HA

NN

AD

R

HA

NN

AD

R

TORONTO CIR

PENCROSS CIR

COHANSEY CIR

W.

E.

AB

LE

DR

BROOKHILL DR

GU

LLD

R

D

DR KENMLER

RD

ND

R

RDR

SCOTTFIELD DR

DRDLDRD

GFIELDR

D

UGFIELDRD

TFIELD

RD

FIE

LDR

D

BROADFIELD

DR

BROADFIELD

DR

CAMPFIELD RD

BEL

FIELD

RD

OAKFIELD DR

OA

KFIE

LDD

R

LINFIE

LDR

D

RIC

HFIE

LDR

D

MA

PLEF

IELD

RD

PINEFIELD

RD

SCO

TTFI

ELD

TURN

DAW

SON

DRDAWSON DR

SH

EA

WA

Y

MC

MILLA

NW

AY

R

EAS T

IMB

ER

DR

N

UPLA

TAHOE CTTANA CT

LUC

ER

GENEVA CT

BURLEIGH CT

DE

ER

RU

ND

R

72

OLD BALTIMORE PIKE

GENDER RD

JOHN F. KENNEDY MEMORIAL HWY

EARL'S CT

ORKNEY CTBL

VD

PEOPLES DR

DA

NTRR

IS

KA

NE

DR

PATT

GELRISA CT

LOUIS CT

JOSEPH DRFLD

AN

VE

RS

CI R D

AN

VE

RS

CI R

HA

NN

AD

R

HA

NN

AD

R

HA

NN

AD

R

TORONTO CIR

PENCROSS CIR

COHANSEY CIR

W.

E.

AB

LE

DR

BROOKHILL DR

GU

LLD

R

D

DR KENMLER

RD

ND

R

RDR

SCOTTFIELD DR

DRDLDRD

GFIELDR

D

UGFIELDRD

TFIELD

RD

FIE

LDR

D

BROADFIELD

DR

BROADFIELD

DR

CAMPFIELD RD

BEL

FIELD

RD

OAKFIELD DR

OA

KFIE

LDD

R

LINFIE

LDR

D

RIC

HFIE

LDR

D

MA

PLEF

IELD

RD

PINEFIELD

RD

SCO

TTFI

ELD

TURN

DAW

SON

DRDAWSON DR

SH

EA

WA

Y

MC

MILLA

NW

AY

R

EAS T

IMB

ER

DR

N

UPLA

TAHOE CTTANA CT

LUC

ER

GENEVA CT

BURLEIGH CT

DE

ER

RU

ND

R

72

OLD BALTIMORE PIKE

GENDER RD

JOHN F. KENNEDY MEMORIAL HWY

BR712B, RAMP J AT I-95, SERVICE CENTER

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project willreinforce the existing rigid concrete frame with glass fiber,reinforced polymer plates and replace the existing hot-mixwith a high performance, latex modified concrete overlay.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 40th on the bridge deficiency list.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF100% ST 100 PE 100 40 40 0 0 0

90% FHWA 400 C 400

All $ X 1,000

JAMAIC

ADR

COUNTRY GATES DR

OLD

PO

ST

CT

MARK

ERD

R

BRIANS CT

RICH

ARDS

DR

WO

OD

CRO

FTST

MILL RD

HILLSIDE RD

FIRELA ERS LA

RDSH

ORLEANS RDORLEAN

MILLERS

LITT

LELA

STWIND LA

DU

RB

NA

SS

AU DR

RIVIERALA

ANDY'S CT

AN

DY

'SLA

PAP

ER

LA

TANEY LA

SMIT

HLA

DONSLA

RA

DK

ALA

THO

MAS

LA

MARKLYN

DR MARHILL

DR

PENNINGTON

DR

PENNINGTON

DR

PEN

NING

TON

DR

MAJESTICDR

MA

JESTIC

CT VALLEY AVE

MAGNOLI

ADR

MO

USLE

YPL

BEACO

NHI

LLLA

LIGHTH

OUSELA

VALLE

YA

VE

LOCUST AVE

CLEA

RVIEW

AVE

OVERLO

OKDROVERLOOK DR

WEST

DUNHILL DR

EMPIRE DR

RE

GA

LD

R

JAMAICA DR

ELMFIELD DRGRAYWOODRD

DONW

OODRD

MAPLEW

OOD

LA

KENW

YNN

RD

PAULWYNN RD

WYNWOOD RD

PATWYNN RD

CRESTFIELD RD

KIMBROUGH DR

CL

EAR

VIE

WA

VE

PIXIEBROADBENT RD

RC

HK

NO

LLR

DSTO

NEC

ROP

RD

TONBRID

GE

NO

RT

HG

ATE

RD

NORTH

GAT

BRIG

HT

SARACT

PE

NN

ING

TON

WAY

WEXFO

RD

CHANNID

ROSS OSS RD

CIN

DE

R

RO

SSC

T

ROSS CIR

RD

CREST

RD

WREXH

SONIA CT

NINAC

WA

LTE

R

SA

WMILLDR

LALOG

PH

EA

SA

NT

CIRDECATUR RD

DECATUR RD

ROSEWOOD DR

DR

IFT

WO

OD

DR

DA

CIA

DR

MORNINGSID

LARKWO O DDR

LANCASHIRE DR

CHARWOOD DRINWOOD RD

INW

OO

DR

D

SHORT DR

KIN

GS

RID

GE

DR

MARLETONDR

NTRD

RDD RD

MATWOOD

RD

LARCHWOODRD

RAMBLERRD

CANEY RDEDE

NRDLONGCOME DR

WES

TMIN

STER

DR

AROSALA

CARLTONLA

LIDOLA

COVENT

FOULK WOODS RD

ALPINE CT

DEEPWO

ODDR DEEPWOOD DR

BLACKWOODRD

LONGWOODDR

DOG

WO

OD

LA

LITTLE LEAF CT

BENTONCT

CREN

SHAW

DR

SUNNY BREA CT

CREN

SHAWLA

FAIR

BLUE

LA

AS

PIN

CT

I LA

LA

SW

EETBR

DOWNE DR

WOOD RDDIFF DR

MAPLESHADE

LA

ELMDA

LELA

BERRYWOOD

CT

GREE

NDAL

ERD

KIN

GM

AND

R

LAN

DO

ND

R

LAN

DO

ND

R

LAND

ON

DR

EATON RD

NEWTON RD

MAM

ETRD

FAIR

LEE

RDKINGMAN DRGARTH RDRAVE RD

RAVE RDBERWYN RD

BERWYN RD

KLETDR

ERSETRD

DREXEL

DRKE

NN

ED

YR

D

RIC

KD

ALE

RD

BO

DINE

DR

JUS

TINE

LA

AUSTIN AUSTIN

RD CIRBURNETT DR

ISH LA

JADE DR

ON

YX

CTITE WAY

CR

YS

TA

LC

T

OP

AL

CT

SA

PH

I RE

CT

RU

BY

DR

GA

RN

ET

P

AMETHYSTDR

BAR

LOW

RD

JESTER LA

BO

DIN

ED

R

OAKMERE RDGRANBY RD

DORVAL RD

FAIR

WO

OD

LA

LYN CT

AN

SON

RD

GREE

NSTONE

RD

LAWERNCE DR

EXTO

ND

R

BRANDYWOODDR

P

92

SILVERSIDE RD

GRUBB RD

GRUBB RD

NAAMANS RD

FOU

LKR

D

MA

RSH

RD

JAMAIC

ADR

COUNTRY GATES DR

OLD

PO

ST

CT

MARK

ERD

R

BRIANS CT

RICH

ARDS

DR

WO

OD

CRO

FTST

MILL RD

HILLSIDE RD

FIRELA ERS LA

RDSH

ORLEANS RDORLEAN

MILLERS

LITT

LELA

STWIND LA

DU

RB

NA

SS

AU DR

RIVIERALA

ANDY'S CT

AN

DY

'SLA

PAP

ER

LA

TANEY LA

SMIT

HLA

DONSLA

RA

DK

ALA

THO

MAS

LA

MARKLYN

DR MARHILL

DR

PENNINGTON

DR

PENNINGTON

DR

PEN

NING

TON

DR

MAJESTICDR

MA

JESTIC

CT VALLEY AVE

MAGNOLI

ADR

MO

USLE

YPL

BEACO

NHI

LLLA

LIGHTH

OUSELA

VALLE

YA

VE

LOCUST AVE

CLEA

RVIEW

AVE

OVERLO

OKDROVERLOOK DR

WEST

DUNHILL DR

EMPIRE DR

RE

GA

LD

R

JAMAICA DR

ELMFIELD DRGRAYWOODRD

DONW

OODRD

MAPLEW

OOD

LA

KENW

YNN

RD

PAULWYNN RD

WYNWOOD RD

PATWYNN RD

CRESTFIELD RD

KIMBROUGH DR

CL

EAR

VIE

WA

VE

PIXIEBROADBENT RD

RC

HK

NO

LLR

DSTO

NEC

ROP

RD

TONBRID

GE

NO

RT

HG

AT E

RD

NORTH

GAT

BRIG

HT

SARACT

PE

NN

ING

TON

WAY

WEXFO

RD

CHANNID

ROSS OSS RD

CIN

DE

R

RO

SSC

T

ROSS CIR

RD

CREST

RD

WREXH

SONIA CT

NINAC

WA

LTE

R

SA

WMILLDR

LALOG

PH

EA

SA

NT

CIRDECATUR RD

DECATUR RD

ROSEWOOD DR

DR

IFT

WO

OD

DR

DA

CIA

DR

MORNINGSID

LARKWO O DDR

LANCASHIRE DR

CHARWOOD DRINWOOD RD

INW

OO

DR

D

SHORT DR

KIN

GS

RID

GE

DR

MARLETONDR

NTRD

RDD RD

MATWOOD

RD

LARCHWOODRD

RAMBLERRD

CANEY RDEDE

NRDLONGCOME DR

WES

TMIN

STER

DR

AROSALA

CARLTONLA

LIDOLA

COVENT

FOULK WOODS RD

ALPINE CT

DEEPWO

ODDR DEEPWOOD DR

BLACKWOODRD

LONGWOODDR

DOG

WO

OD

LA

LITTLE LEAF CT

BENTONCT

CREN

SHAW

DR

SUNNY BREA CT

CREN

SHAWLA

FAIR

BLUE

LA

AS

PIN

CT

I LA

LA

SW

EETBR

DOWNE DR

WOOD RDDIFF DR

MAPLESHADE

LA

ELMDA

LELA

BERRYWOOD

CT

GREE

NDAL

ERD

KIN

GM

AND

R

LAN

DO

ND

R

LAN

DO

ND

R

LAND

ON

DR

EATON RD

NEWTON RD

MAM

ETRD

FAIR

LEE

RDKINGMAN DRGARTH RDRAVE RD

RAVE RDBERWYN RD

BERWYN RD

KLETDR

ERSETRD

DREXEL

DRKE

NN

ED

YR

D

RIC

KD

ALE

RD

BO

DINE

DR

JUS

TINE

LA

AUSTIN AUSTIN

RD CIRBURNETT DR

ISH LA

JADE DR

ON

YX

CTITE WAY

CR

YS

TA

LC

T

OP

AL

CT

SA

PH

I RE

CT

RU

BY

DR

GA

RN

ET

P

AMETHYSTDR

BAR

LOW

RD

JESTER LA

BO

DIN

ED

R

OAKMERE RDGRANBY RD

DORVAL RD

FAIR

WO

OD

LA

LYN CT

AN

SON

RD

GREE

NSTONE

RD

LAWERNCE DR

EXTO

ND

R

BRANDYWOODDR

P

92

SILVERSIDE RD

GRUBB RD

GRUBB RD

NAAMANS RD

FOU

LKR

D

MA

RSH

RD

GRUBB/HARVEY ROAD (N209), NAAMAN’S ROAD TO MARSH ROAD

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project primarily involves pavementrehabilitation and drainage improvements. It will also include minor intersection andpedestrian improvements, including a small section of sidewalk and pedestrian signals.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Several areas along this roadwayare experiencing drainage problems.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 7, 8, 10Senatorial District: 4, 5

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 410 0 0 0

93-061-14 100% ST 100 PE 100100% ST 250 R/W 250

80% FHWA 2,050 C 2,050

All $ X 1,000

I-95, WILMINGTON VIADUCT TO US202

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Reconstruction and rehabilitation of the existing I-95 pavement from US202 to the PA line was completed and open totraffic in October 2000. The second phase of I-95 rehabilitation is the Wilmington Viaduct Project, which will begin in FY 2003 and continue through FY 2004.The third phase to this rehabilitation involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of the pavement between the Wilmington Viaduct and US202.

An additional part of the project is the I-95 landscaping. Phase I has been planted. Phase II is in design. This work includes adding trees, shrubs, low maintenancegrasses, and enhancing the “Gateway to Delaware” at the Pennsylvania State Line.

As part of the I-95 traffic mitigation plans, additional interstate access will be provided on I-495 in Wilmington by constructing two of four missing ramp movements at theexisting US 13 interchange. The first ramp will terminate at Rogers Road from I-495 southbound and is currently under construction. The second will merge with the existingramp southbound US 13 to reach I-495 northbound.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Pavement is exhibiting signs of deterioration and must be replaced.County: New CastleProgram Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8Senatorial District: 1, 3, 4, 5, 13

EST COSTINDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,970 3,470 3,470 0

Wilmington Viaduct to US202 80% AC FHWA 3,000 PE 700 2,30090% DISC FHWA 34,700 C 17,350 17,350

Public information campaign 90% FHWA 500 INF 500100% ST 289 INF 289

Landscaping 100% ST 65 PE 6590% FHWA 200 C 200

Traffic Management Imps (TMI) 80% FHWA 1,100 PE 1,10090% FHWA 6,250 C 6,250

ITMS 80% FHWA 4,000 C 2,000 2,000

I-495 / US 13 SB Off Ramp to NB US 13 100% ST 30 PE/ENV 30100% ST 1,100 C 1,100

Churchman’s Rail Service 100% ST 1,389 1,389

All $ X 1,000

2

9

13

13

202

13

3202

48

52

495

RT PIKE

D

PENNSYLVANIA

AVE

DU

PO

NT

RD

D

THO

USEERE

WILMINGTON

2

9

13

13

202

13

3202

48

52

495

RT PIKE

D

PENNSYLVANIA

AVE

DU

PO

NT

RD

D

THO

USEERE

WILMINGTON

13

95

9A

202

13

495

PIG

EO

N

ORTPIK

E

WOOD RD

RE13

95

9A

202

13

495

PIG

EO

N

ORTPIK

E

WOOD RD

RE

I-95, WILMINGTON VIADUCT TO US202 (CONTINUED)

WILMINGTON VIADUCT TO US202 I-495 TO US 13 AND US 13 TO I-495

MEDAT

L

CTANDS

CT

TAN

DIS

HMANCHESTER

CO

NG

RE

SS

ST

TEXA

SLA

2ND ST

STE

WA

RT

ST

MERCHANT ST

MARKET ST

WHITE OAK DR

RE

DO

AK

DR

GR

EAT

OAK

DR

PIN OAK DR

OAK

LEA

FD

RACORN DR

BO

XW

OO

DLALY CT

WO

SUGAR PINE DRWHITE PINE DR

WH

ITE

BAR

KD

R

LOBL

OLL

YLA

RE

YP

INE

DR

PIN

EV

AL

LEY

DR

PIN

EV

AL

LEY

DR

PONDEROSA DR

FOXHAILDR CEDAR

CT

BRISTLE CONE DR

BLUE RIDGE DR

LEXIN

GTONDR

9PORT PENN RD PORT PENN RD

POLE BRIDGE RD

AU

GU

STIN

E

T

BAYVIEW RD

SR9,

Slop

eSt

abili

zatio

n

MEDAT

L

CTANDS

CT

TAN

DIS

HMANCHESTER

CO

NG

RE

SS

ST

TEXA

SLA

2ND ST

STE

WA

RT

ST

MERCHANT ST

MARKET ST

WHITE OAK DR

RE

DO

AK

DR

GR

EAT

OAK

DR

PIN OAK DR

OAK

LEA

FD

RACORN DR

BO

XW

OO

DLALY CT

WO

SUGAR PINE DRWHITE PINE DR

WH

ITE

BAR

KD

R

LOBL

OLL

YLA

RE

YP

INE

DR

PIN

EV

AL

LEY

DR

PIN

EV

AL

LEY

DR

PONDEROSA DR

FOXHAILDR CEDAR

CT

BRISTLE CONE DR

BLUE RIDGE DR

LEXIN

GTONDR

9PORT PENN RD PORT PENN RD

POLE BRIDGE RD

AU

GU

STIN

E

T

BAYVIEW RD

SR9,

Slop

eSt

abili

zatio

n

SR141 BASIN RD, SR273 (FRENCHTOWN ROAD) TO BURNSIDEBOULEVARD

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This concrete roadway is deteriorating due to thepresence of an alkali silica reaction (ASR) found in the concrete itself. The project will beundertaken in three parts, as outlined below.

BR680 will include the replacement of the superstructure and rehabilitationof the substructure. Additional clearance will be gained by using highperformance steel girders and fiber reinforced plastic deck panels with ahigh performance concrete overlay.

Pavement rehabilitation from SR273 to Burnside Boulevard will includereconstruction of pavement with shoulders and sidewalks. and will becompleted in two separate phases, SR273 to Jay Drive and from Jay Driveto Burnside Boulevard.

Safety improvements in the areas of SR141 North of US 13 to US 13, including WashingtonAvenue, will include the extension of Washington Avenue to SR141; and closures toPennsylvania & Delaware Avenue at SR141 and Washington Avenue at US 13.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To alleviate the ASR problem.County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 15,17,19Senatorial District: 9,12,13

EST COSTFMB ID INDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 455 3,253 3,100 0

99-071-10 BR680, US 13 and SR 141 100% ST 150 R/W 15080% FHWA 3,375 C 3,375

Pavement Reconstruction• SR273 to Jay Drive 80% FHWA 575 PE 575

80% FHWA 11,500 C 12,247

• Jay Drive to Burnside Blvd 80% FHWA 15,500 C 15,500

99-007-01 SR141, North of US 13 Delaware 100% ST 455 R/W 455Avenue to Jay Drive 90% FHWA 927 C 927

All $ X 1,000

BRACKENVILLE ROAD, SR 48 TO BARLEY MILL ROAD, SAFETY

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project will include minor widening to provide10’ travel lanes and 2’ grass shoulders. A closed drainage system and guardrail will beinstalled as part of the pavement rehabilitation.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Narrow travel lanes and safetyconcerns have been brought to the attention of the Department by areacitizens.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 12, 20Senatorial District: 6, 7

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 800 0 363 0

20-044-01 100% ST 595 LOC 295 300100% ST 272 PE 272100% ST 500 R/W 500

80% FHWA 1,816 C 1,818

All $ X 1,000

2

58

Armstrong

FrogtownCrossing

BoydsCorner

McDonough

Mt. Pleasant

Jamisons Corner

1

22

424441

429

430438

22A

428425

426

15 420

423

37

424

428

427

427

429

39

431

435

435

436

435

429

39437

437

432

43215

39

433

16

415

413

413

22

2

OLD SCHOOL HOUSE RD

PORT PE

MIT

BRID

GE

RD

BOYDS CORNER RD

DU

P

SU

MM

ITB

RID

GE

RD

RNER RD

ON

CO

RN

ER

RD

RA

TLE

DG

POLE BRIDGE RD

BAYVIEW RD

OLD CORBIT RD

CED

ARLA

NE

RD

SHALL

CRO

SSLA

KERD

MARL PIT RD

MARL PIT RD

SILVE

SILV

ERR

VANCE NECK RD

BR

ICK

MILL

RD

PE

TER

S

EMER

SO

NR

D

RD

CHURCHTOWN RD

CHURCH RD

CHOPTANK

RD

CHURCHTOWN RD

BUNKER HILL RD

BOHEMIA MILL RD 301

9299

13

71

896

1

15

15

286

ODESSA

Bridge 377

CHOPTANK ROAD (SR 15 TO N455)

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The project will widen the current 18’ travelway to 24’with additional 2’ – 5’ bicycle/pedestrian shoulders; patching and wedging 3” hot-mix overlay;realigning the approach (BR377); and realigning the intersection of N435 and N437 to createclear sight lines/distance. As part of this project it will be necessary torelocate utilities and purchase right of way for new cross-section andrealignments. The BR377 (one-lane) bridge replacement will be a separateproject.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To provide additional modes oftransportation in the US301 corridor.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 440 0 1,200 1,400

100% ST 180 ENV 180100% ST 700 PE 700100% ST 1,200 R/W 1,200

80% FHWA 7,000 C 7,000

All $ X 1,000

CHURCHMAN’S CROSSING CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:

Multi – modal Improvements

• Areawide Sidewalks / Bus Stops - Options to provide safe travelways for pedestrians and bicyclists. Improvements to bus shelters and bus pads toprovide refuge areas for transit patrons.

• Red Mill Road sidewalk – Provide for safe pedestrian movement along this busy roadway.

• Enhanced Transit Services – Purchase vehicles to provide additional bus service, including shuttles throughout the area along with a ride share matching service;guaranteed ride home program; vanpool services, flexible work program transportation management coordination; provide timetables at bus stops; and work with localemployees to promote compressed work week, staggered work hour, and preferential parking programs.

• Bus Purchase – Bus purchase for circulator routes through the corridor.

• ITMS – Enhance computerized traffic systems and other technological improvements to improve traffic flow and incident management throughout the area.

Intersection Improvements: The intersections listed below will be programmed for design and construction as conditions warrant, per the triggers recommended in theChurchman’s Crossing Study. The funding shown is timed to be available when these intersections meet the triggers. Information from on-going traffic conditions monitoringwill cause adjustments to be made.

• SR 2/SR 7 – Additional left turn lane storage capacity for Kirkwood Highway and traffic turning onto SR 7.• SR 4/SR 7 (I) – Additional left turn storage capacity for SR 4 traffic turning onto SR 7.• SR 7/SR273- Additional left turn storage capacity for SR273 traffic turning onto SR 7.• SR 273/Harmony Road – Intersection improvements to address the merging of traffic on westbound SR273 between Harmony Road and I-95.• SR 2/Harmony Road – Additional left turn storage capacity for Kirkwood Highway (SR 2) traffic turning onto SR 7.• SR 4/Harmony Road – Additional capacity on SR 4 to improve the intersection’s level of service.• SR 4/SR 7 Phase (II) – Additional capacity at intersection to support existing recorded development (JP Morgan).

95

202

1

273

4058

37

2

141

4

58

7

273

273

273

37

62

13

2

CHURCHMANS RD

TPKY

BUNKERHILL

BASIN

RD

OLD

AIRPO

RTRD

MA

NRD BOXW

GENDER

RD

GENDER RD

CHAPMAN RD

E PIKE

AP

CHRISTIANA RD

AIR

POR

TRD

OLDCHURCHMANS RD

AIR

PO

RT

RD

EA

GLE

RU

NR

D

OLD

NEWA

RKRD

KIRKWOOD HWY

RED

MILL

RD

OLDHARMONY

RD

OGLETOWN STANTON

RD

OLD

CHURCHMANS

RD

KIAMENSI RD

TELEGRAPHRD

LIME

STON

ER

D

ST

AN

TO

NR

D

WO

LLAS

TO

NR

D

HEN

DER

SO

NR

D

PIKE CREEK RD

OLD COACH RD

UP

PE

RPIK

EC

RE

EKR

D

UMPARK

RD

D

OX DEN RD MIL

LTO

W

NEW

LIN

H

A

E

FJJD

I

C

K

GB

95

202

1

273

4058

37

2

141

4

58

7

273

273

273

37

62

13

2

CHURCHMANS RD

TPKY

BUNKERHILL

BASIN

RD

OLD

AIRPO

RTRD

MA

NRD BOXW

GENDER

RD

GENDER RD

CHAPMAN RD

E PIKE

AP

CHRISTIANA RD

AIR

POR

TRD

OLDCHURCHMANS RD

AIR

PO

RT

RD

EA

GLE

RU

NR

D

OLD

NEWA

RKRD

KIRKWOOD HWY

RED

MILL

RD

OLDHARMONY

RD

OGLETOWN STANTON

RD

OLD

CHURCHMANS

RD

KIAMENSI RD

TELEGRAPHRD

LIME

STON

ER

D

ST

AN

TO

NR

D

WO

LLAS

TO

NR

D

HEN

DER

SO

NR

D

PIKE CREEK RD

OLD COACH RD

UP

PE

RPIK

EC

RE

EKR

D

UMPARK

RD

D

OX DEN RD MIL

LTO

W

NEW

LIN

H

A

E

FJJD

I

C

K

GB

CHURCHMAN’S CROSSING CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)

• SR 4/Churchman’s Road – Intersection improvements to support the Churchman’s Crossing Rail Station.• SR273/Chapman Road – Intersection modification to support existing recorded development

Roadway Improvements:• Harmony Road traffic calming – Improvement(s) will be required as a result of temporary traffic rerouting through the area.• Ramp for Churchman’s Road to I-95 – Northbound access to I-95 from Churchman’s Road. This ramp will provide relief for traffic that accesses I-95 via a one lane

loop ramp.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: These projects are the beginning of the implementation phase for the Churchman’s Crossing Study.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System Management

Representative District: 18, 19, 21Senatorial District: 9, 11

CHURCHMAN’S CROSSING CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)INDIVIDUAL PROJECT EST COSTSEGMENTS FUNDING TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 4,966 3,392 1,940 2,080

Churchmans Crossing Imp’s 80% FHWA 8,982 582 500 1,500 6,400100% ST 5,777 3,000 1,377 600 800

Program Management 100% ST 775 MGT 325 250 200

Multi – Modal Improvements

• Areawide Sidewalks/Bus Stops 100% ST 386 PE 36 350100% ST 180 R/W 80 100

80% FHWA 7,166 C 1,166 3,000 3,000

• Red Mill Road Sidewalk 80% FHWA 458 C 458

• Enhance Transit Service 100% ST 450 PRO 450

• Bus Purchase 100% ST 300 PRO 300ITMS 100% ST 300 PE 150 150

80% FHWA 2,000 C 1,000 1,000Intersections• SR 2/SR 7 100% ST 107 PE 107

80% FHWA 780 C 780• SR 4/SR 7 (Phase I) 100% ST 292 PE 292

100% ST 325 R.W 32580% FHWA 960 C 960

• SR273/Harmony Road 100% ST 140 PE 14080% FHWA 700 C 700

• SR 2/Harmony Road 100% ST 300 PE 30080% FHWA 1,500 C 1,500

• SR 4/Harmony Road 100% ST 500 PE 50080% FHWA 2,500 C 2,500

• SR 4/SR 7 (Phase II) 100% ST 300 PE 30080% FHWA 1,500 C 1,500

• SR 4/Churchman’s Road 100% ST 400 PE 40080% FHWA C*

• SR273/Chapman Road 100% ST 400 PE 40080% FHWA 2,000 C 2,000

Roadway Improvements• Harmony Road Traffic Calming 80% FHWA 444 C 444

• Ramp Churchman’s Road to I-95 100% ST 500 PE 390 11080% FHWA 2,500 C 2,500

Other Areawide Improvements• Churchman’s Road / SR 7 100% ST 650 R/W 650

ODESSA

MIDDLETOWN

OLD SCHOOL HOUSE RD

PORTP ENN RDPORT PEN N RD

SUM

MIT

BRIDG

ER

D

BOYDS CORNER RD

SUM

MIT

BRIDG

ER

D

LEV

ELS

RD

DU

PO

NT

PAR

KW

AY

NOXONTOWN

RD

SU

MM

ITB

RID

GE

RD

LOREW

OOD

GRO

VERD

HYETTS CORN ER R D

JAM

ISO

NC

OR

NE

RR

D

RA

T LE

DGE

RD

THORNTOWN RD

POLE BRIDGE RD

AU

GU

STI

NER

D

ST

BAYVIEW RD

OLD CORBIT RD

SILV

ER

RU

NRD

CED

ARLA

NE

RD SH

ALLC

RO

SSLA

KERD

MARL PIT RD

MARL PI T RD

BETHEL CHURCH RD

BOHEMIA MILL RD

MI DDLETOWN

WARWICK RD

MIDD

LENE

CK

RD

STANNSCHURCH

RD

TAYLO

RS

BR

IDGE

RD

STAVES LANDING RD

HA

MM

OND

RD

MP RD

FIELDSBORO RD

OLD

STA

TERD

NOXONTOWN

R D

THOMAS LA ND INGRD

SIL VER

LA

KE

RD

SILVE

RR

UN

RD

VANCE N ECK RD

BRI C

KM

I LLR

D

PE

TER

SON

RD

EM

ERS

ON

RD

RD

WIG

GIN

SM

ILLRD

BUNKER HI LL RD

CHURCH TOWN RD

BETHEL CHURCH RD

C HESAPEAKE CITY RD

LR

D

CHOPT

ANK

RD

CHURCHTOWN RD

DUTC

HN

ECK

RD

896

301

9

9

301

301

299

299

299

13

15

71

896

1

15

15

286

SR

1SR

1S

R1

SR 1

SR 1

SR 1

SR 1

ODESSA

MIDDLETOWN

OLD SCHOOL HOUSE RD

PORTP ENN RDPORT PEN N RD

SUM

MIT

BRIDG

ER

D

BOYDS CORNER RD

SUM

MIT

BRIDG

ER

D

LEV

ELS

RD

DU

PO

NT

PAR

KW

AY

NOXONTOWN

RD

SU

MM

ITB

RID

GE

RD

LOREW

OOD

GRO

VERD

HYETTS CORN ER R D

JAM

ISO

NC

OR

NE

RR

D

RA

T LE

DGE

RD

THORNTOWN RD

PO LE BRIDG E RD

AU

GU

STI

NER

D

ST

BAYVIEW RD

OLD CORBIT RD

SILV

ER

RU

NRD

CED

ARLA

NE

RD SH

ALLC

RO

SSLA

KERD

MARL PIT RD

MA RL PI T R D

BETHEL CHURCH RD

BOHEMIA MILL RD

MI DDLETOWN

WARWICK RD

MIDD

LENE

CK

RD

STANNSCHURCH

RD

TAYLO

RS

BR

IDGE

RD

STAVES LANDING RD

HA

MM

OND

RD

MP RD

FIELDSBORO RD

OLD

STA

TERD

NOXONTOWN

R D

THOMAS LA ND INGRD

SIL VER

LA

KE

RD

SILVE

RR

UN

RD

VANCE N ECK RD

BRI C

KM

I LLR

D

PE

TER

SON

RD

EM

ERS

ON

RD

RD

WIG

GIN

SM

ILLRD

BUNKER HI LL RD

CHURCH TOWN RD

BETHEL CHURCH RD

C HESAPEAKE CITY RD

LR

D

CHOPT

ANK

RD

CHURCHTOWN RD

DUTC

HN

ECK

RD

896

301

9

9

301

301

299

299

299

13

15

71

896

1

15

15

286

SR

1SR

1S

R1

SR 1

SR 1

SR 1

SR 1

SOUTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY IMPROVEMENTSPROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The US 301 Major Investment Studyencompasses the area from the Maryland line to US 13, and from I-95 to the area justsouth of Middletown. The study is complete and has been adopted by WILMAPCO.Options have been narrowed to multi-modal packages of improvements/expansions(transit, pedestrian, bike, minor and major roadways). The final selected package ofimprovements will be phased in over the next 20+ years and, depending on the alternativechosen, may include major road capacity increases. These couldrange from dualization of existing US301 and SR896 (south ofC&D canal) to a new four lane limited access highway between theMaryland line and SR 1-95, in addition to minor and majorroadway expansion projects north of the C&D canal. Anenvironmental impact statement will be prepared over the nextthree years, with subsequent review, coordination, and agreementswith federal/state agencies, leading to location, design, andpossible funding through the System Expansion Program. Fundingis available within this project allocation for improvements to thesecondary road system in Southern New Castle County, the first ofwhich is Choptank Road as noted on a page in the System Management section.Additional secondary road improvements will be identified through a joint studyconducted by New Castle County and the Department and funded under this project.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To develop projects identified through the US301 MajorInvestment Study; the local roads plan being developed jointly by DelDOTand New Castle County; and economic development efforts to bring jobssouth of the C&D canal.

County: New CastleMunicipality: MiddletownProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 9Senatorial District: 14

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 900 3,160 5,388

100% ST 80 PR 80100% ST 1,400 R/W 1,400100% ST 2,400 C 2,400

80% FHWA 49,740 C 7,000 15,000 26,940

SR 41 (LANCASTER PIKE) YORKLYN ROAD TO VALLEY ROAD

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: An extensive community involvement process, refinedthe plan developed by WILMAPCO to address current traffic and pedestrian safety issues alongthe corridor extending from north of Valley Road to near School House Road. The planincludes installation of auxiliary turn lanes, channelization, restriping,crosswalks, possible street lighting and other aesthetic enhancements, andcould require additional right-of-way. (See the Program DevelopmentSection of this document for additional planning schedule.)

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: In 1997, the Highway SafetyImprovement Program identified the need for roadway and intersectionimprovements to correct recurringaccident conditions in the corridor.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 20Senatorial District: 6

FMB ID EST COST CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR FUNDING TO COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJPROJ # IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 360 1,000 1,260 020-007-02 100% ST 125 LOC/ENV 125

100% ST 735 PE 250 485100% ST 1,000 R/W 1,000

80% FHWA 6,300 C 6,300

All $ X 1,000

896

896

4

22BR

CHESTNUT HILL RD

GENDER

RD

GEND

KENNEDY MEMORIAL HWY

OLD

NEWARK

RD

CH

AP

EL

ST

EX

T

WYOMING RD

NUT HILL RD

E

896

896

4

22BR

CHESTNUT HILL RD

GENDER

RD

GEND

KENNEDY MEMORIAL HWY

OLD

NEWARK

RD

CH

AP

EL

ST

EX

T

WYOMING RD

NUT HILL RD

E

SR896 AND SR 4 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, NEWARK

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Planned improvements include the channelization oftraffic and restriping for additional/longer left turning lanes at this major intersection.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project was identified through theDepartment’s Project Development Committee for inclusion in the CIP.

County: New CastleMunicipality: NewarkProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 11Senatorial District: 4, 6

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 32 34 0 0

100% ST 32 PE 3280% FHWA 170 C 170

All $ X 1,000

40

DU

PO

NT

PKY

OLD PORTER RD

REDLIO

NCHURCH

RD RED LION RD

BE

AR

CO

RB

ITT

RD

CARLO RDWE

LLI NG

T ON

DR

BUS . CT

T

COUNTRY WOODS DR

TIMBER

KNOLL

DR

HERONGREENCT

LA

LINDEN

SPRING

CT

HEATHERLOFT

GR

OVE M

AN

SIO

NW

AY

N

DRM

ITE

TIAK

LAKETA

HOE

CIR

LAKE

AR

DR

REM

O

.

SABRINACIR.

NA

PLE

WA

Y

BO

NO

RVA

CT.

I DR.LI CT.

COUNCILCIR

.

HUNTERDR.

E.

FIELDSTONERD

SK

YA

S HE N

CT

MO

OR

S

CT

WILDFIELD

CT

RUSHES DR

MO

ATCT

RDHE

CRO

YDE

NR

DD

ARW

INR

DAN

DRE

ARD

CY

NTHIA

RD

CASSAN RD

DAVID PL JAMES

CT

EDWARCT

CLAIRMONT DR

SMITHLA

GARWOOD DR

GLO

RIA

CT

TOLHAM DR

MOORES DR

REGAL BLVD

CA

STLE

RUN

CO

T TA

GE

CT

FIE

LDS

T ON

EC

T

KIN

GS

CR

OF

TD

R

KIN GS CROFT DR

KINGSTON DR

N.

S.

RE

GA

LC

T

RA

WL I

NG

SD

R

GAY

NO

RC

T

VE L

LA ND

R

MEADOW KNOLL CTJANSSEN CT

ABB

EY

CTDORIS

CT

PIGEON

RUNDR

PIGEON RUN DR

GODR

ERON

CT

HOBKIRKAY

BOR

NC

T

HAMPTON

CT

TEAL CIRBRO

OKM

ONT

DR

KEMPER

DRDRRAVEN

TURN

EGRETC

T

LOVER

CIR

SCOTLANDDR

LIVERP

KYLE ST

JOYCELYN

INGRAM

HYDE PARK

GARNET ST

FREDERICK ST

EDINBURGH

DAN ST

CADAGAN

BURBANK

ALBERT ST

GLAS

GOWD

R

N. PATRICE

DR

QUINCE

DR

REGEN

TDR

SOPHIADR

TRUDY

DR

N. OXFO

RDDR

BRADLEY

DR

ERIVERS

DR

GU

40

DU

PO

NT

PKY

OLD PORTER RD

REDLIO

NCHURCH

RD RED LION RD

BE

AR

CO

RB

ITT

RD

CARLO RDWE

LLI NG

T ON

DR

BUS . CT

T

COUNTRY WOODS DR

TIMBER

KNOLL

DR

HERONGREENCT

LA

LINDEN

SPRING

CT

HEATHERLOFT

GR

OVE M

AN

SIO

NW

AY

N

D RM

ITE

TIAK

LAKETA

HOE

CIR

LAKE

AR

DR

REM

O

.

SABRINACIR.

NA

PLE

WA

Y

BO

NO

RVA

CT.

I DR.LI CT.

COUNCILCIR

.

HUNTERDR.

E.

FIELDSTONERD

SK

YA

S HE N

CT

MO

OR

S

CT

WILDFIELD

CT

RUSHES DR

MO

ATCT

RDHE

CRO

YDE

NR

DD

A RW

INR

DAN

DRE

ARD

CY

NTHIA

RD

CASSAN RD

DAVID PL JAMES

CT

EDWARCT

CLAIRMONT DR

SMITHLA

GARWOOD DR

GLO

RIA

CT

TOLHAM DR

MOORES DR

REGAL BLVD

CA

STLE

RUN

CO

T TA

GE

CT

FIE

LDS

T ON

EC

T

KIN

GS

CR

OF

TD

R

KIN GS CROFT DR

KINGSTON DR

N.

S.

RE

GA

LC

T

RA

WL I

NG

SD

R

GAY

NO

RC

T

VE L

LA ND

R

MEADOW KNOLL CTJANSSEN CT

ABB

EY

CTDORIS

CT

PIGEON

RUNDR

PIGEON RUN DR

GODR

ERON

CT

HOBKIRKAY

BOR

NC

T

HAMPTON

CT

TEAL CIRBRO

OKM

ONT

DR

KEMPER

DRDRRAVEN

TURN

EGRETC

T

LOVER

CIR

SCOTLANDDR

LIVERP

KYLE ST

JOYCELYN

INGRAM

HYDE PARK

GARNET ST

FREDERICK ST

EDINBURGH

DAN ST

CADAGAN

BURB ANK

ALBERT ST

GLAS

GOWD

R

N. PATRICE

DR

QUINCE

DR

REGEN

TDR

SOPHIADR

TRUDY

DR

N. OXFO

RDDR

BRADLEY

DR

ERIVERS

DR

GU

40

7

DU

P

OLD PORTER RD

RED

LION

CHU

RCHR

D RED LIO

COUN

BE

AR

CO

RB

ITT

RD

SU

NS

ET

LAK

ER

D

REYBOLD RDOLD HAMBURG

WR

BA

C

D

40

7

DU

PO

NT

OLD PORTER RD

RED

LION

CHU

RCHR

D RED LION R

COUN

BE

AR

CO

RB

ITT

RD

SU

NS

ET

LAK

ER

D

REYBOLD RDOLD HAMBURG RD

WR

BA

C

D

US 40, MARYLAND LINE TO US 13, CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SCOPE: This project seeks to implement the recommendations of the Route 40 Steering Committee, a public group that has recommendedtransportation improvements for the next twenty years to address planned growth and enhance the quality of life in the Route 40 Corridor. The Committee’srecommendations are found in The Route 40 Corridor 20-Year Transportation Plan dated June 19, 2000.

The projects listed below represent the first phase of improvements recommended by the Plan. These projects will be closely tied to an ongoing travelmonitoring program through the Route 40 Corridor Monitoring Committee (CMC), which has been charged to implement the recommendations of the Plan.Triggered projects will not be constructed until changing conditions dictate in order to avoid creating excess capacity and inducing additional development andtraffic in the corridor. Conceptual Engineering and Environmental Documentation of large projects proposed for later phases are also beginning in FY2001 tofacilitate implementation in the later years of the program and preserve needed right of way.

Intersection ImprovementsA. US 40/Walther Road (Short Term) – Addition of a southbound right turn lane to address existing capacity problems.B. US 40/Governors Square/Glendale Connector – Improvements at the intersection to provide southbound double left

turn lanes, and one right turn lane, plus northbound double left turn lanes, one through lane, and right turn lane.This improvement is tied to Eden Square Connector needs.

C. US 40/SR 72 – Addition of northbound and southbound through lanes, and eastbound and westbound left turn lanesto provide double lefts.

D. SR 72/Del Laws – Realignment of the intersection to align with the proposed entrance to the Rickey CommerceCenter.

Roadway ImprovementsE. Church Road, US 40 to Queensbury Village I - Improvements will include two travel lanes, bike lanes,

sidewalks, and railroad crossing devices. Improvements to the intersection of Church Road and US 40 willprovide additional turn lanes and pedestrian signals, as well as additional lighting. This project includesprivate developer contributions.

40

DU

PON

TPK

Y

OLD PORTER RD

REDLIO

NCHURCH

RD RED LION RD

CO

BE

AR

CO

RB

ITT

RD

SU

NS

ET

LAK

ER

D

LD HAMBURG RD

G

F

40

DU

PON

TPK

Y

OLD PORTER RD

REDLIO

NCHURCH

RD RED LION RD

CO

BE

AR

CO

RB

ITT

RD

SU

NS

ET

LAK

ER

D

LD HAMBURG RD

G

FUS 40, MARYLAND LINE TO US 13, CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)

New RoadwaysF. Eden Square Connector – Construct road from SR 7, south of Eden Square Shopping Center to relieve

congestion at US 40/SR 7 intersection and improve accessibility.G. Rue Madora Drive – Connection to two existing sections of Rue Madora Drive behind the Fox Run Shopping

Center to improve local mobility.

Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements- US40, SR72 to Appleby Road – Sidewalks, crosswalks, minor intersectionimprovements and signal modifications to address existing transportation problems at various locations throughoutthe US 40 Corridor. Specific locations and plans include:H. Songsmith Drive Sidewalks, McMullen Circle to Smalleys Dam Road.I. US40 Sidepaths, Church Rd to SR1 – 10’ foot wide combined pedestrian/bicycle paths along both sides of Route 40.J. US40 Sidepaths, Salem Church Rd to Church Road.K. Wilton Blvd and Appleby Road Sidewalks.L. US40 Sidepaths, SR72 to Salem Church Road.M. Old Baltimore Pike Sidepath, SR72 to SR273 – 10’ foot wide combined pedestrian/bicycle path along one side of Old Baltimore Pike.N. SR72 Sidewalks, US40 to SR71 – Addition of sidewalks along both sides of SR72. Tied to a long term needs planning study of SR72.O. Walther Road Sidewalks, Old Baltimore Pike to US40.

Transit Service Enhancements –P. Waterford Pedestrian Access – ADA accessible access to the bus stop on US40 from Waterford I to include a ramp system over the berm, lighting, and other security

features.Q. Additional Pedestrian Connection to Bus Stops – Sidewalk connections to bus stops throughout the corridor.R. Bus Purchase – Purchase vehicles to provide additional transit services throughout the corridor.S. Additional Bus Stop Improvements – Additional bus shelters at selected locations throughout the corridor.T. Park and Ride Preservation/Expansion – Preservation of existing lots in the corridor (People’s Plaza and SR7/SR273) and consideration of new ones (near both the

SR72/US40 area and US40/SR7 areas.)U. Route Deviation Service – Funding of a pilot project for route deviation transit services as an extension of neighborhood transit services program.

Other ImprovementsV. US40 Signing and Streetscape Master Plan – Enhanced signage and streetscaping in the corridor. Construction of signage is scheduled for FY2002. Implementation of

streetscaping scheduled for FY2005-2007W. Access Management on Developing Properties – Coordination through NCC’s land development process to reduce the number of new access points on Route 40.X. US40 Streetscaping – Implementation of Streetscape Master Plan.

US 40, MARYLAND LINE TO US 13, CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:County: New CastleProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 15, 17, 24, 26, 27Senatorial District: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

EST COSTINDIVIDUAL PROJECT TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007SEGMENTS FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 8,751 6,681 11,150 4,190US 40 Planning & Prelim Eng. 80% FHWA 4,185 PE 2,270 1,915

100% ST 6,303 PE 3,502 1,516 1,285

US 40 Right of Way 100% ST 17,793 R/W 2,157 4,006 4,475 6,065 1,090

IntersectionsA. US 40 / Walther Rd (Short Term) 100% ST 46 PE 46

80% FHWA 304 C 304

B. US 40/Gov Sq.Glendale Conn. 100% ST 77 PE 7780% FHWA 516 C 516

C. US 40/ SR 72 80% FHWA 862 C 862

D. SR 72 / DeLaws Road 80% FHWA 552 C 552

Roadway ImprovementsE. Church Road, US 40 to Queensbury 80% FHWA 4,463 C 4,463

New RoadwaysF. Eden Square Connector 80% FHWA 203 PE 203

Other/FHWA 1,350 C 1,350

G. Rue Madora 100% ST 50 PE 5080% FHWA 334 C 334

Bicycle/Pedestrian ImprovementsH. Songsmith Drive Sidewalks 80% FHWA 156 PE 156

80% FHWA 1,040 C 1,040

I. Sidepaths, Church Rd to SR1 80% FHWA 2,623 C 2,623

J. Sidepaths, Salem Church to Church Rd. 80% FHWA 895 C 895

US 40, MARYLAND LINE TO US 13, CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)

EST COSTINDIVIDUAL PROJECT TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007SEGMENTS FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

K. Wilton Blvd./Appleby Rd. Sidewalks 80% FHWA 1,733 C 1,733

L. Sidepaths, SR 72 to Salem Church Rd. 80% FHWA 1,887 C 1,887

M. Sidepaths, Old Balt Pike, SR 72 to SR273 80% FHWA 392 PE 39280% FHWA 2,613 C 2,613

N. SR 72 Sidewalks, US 40 to SR 71 80% FHWA 3,157 C 3,157

O. Walther Rd Sidewalks, OBP to US 40 80% FHWA 1,635 C 1,635

Transit Improvements

P. Waterford Pedestrian Access 100% ST 20 PE 2080% FHWA 135 C 135

Q. Additional Pedestrian Connections to Stops 100% ST 34 PE 3480% FHWA 225 C 225

R. Bus Purchase 100% ST 300 PRO 300

S. Additional Bus Stop Improvements 100% ST 68 PE 6880% FHWA 450 C 450

T. Park – n – Ride Preservation/Expansion 100% ST 900 C 900

U. Route Deviation Service 100% ST 1,550 TR 1,550

Other ImprovementsV. US 40 Signing and Streetscape Master Plan 100% ST 90 PE 90

100% ST 290 C 290

W. Access Management on Developing Properties 100% ST 50 PE 5080% FHWA 680 C 680

X. US 40 Streetscape 80% FHWA 2,200 C 2,200

All $ X 1,000

WILMINGTON TRAFFIC CALMING AND PEDESTRIAN/TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS

A. Fourth Street, Walnut Street to I-95– Fourth St. is an important vehicular and transit route. The goal is to improve pedestrian safety of the four-laneroadway and create a transit-friendly environment by constructing bus shelters, improving striping and crosswalks locations, and re-constructing sidewalks.Improve signalization will also be done as part of the project.

B. Delaware Ave. Monroe Street to Walnut Street - The goals of this project include better vehicle circulation and enhanced pedestrian amenities. This willbe done through the re-alignment of lanes; restiping so that lane assignments are clear; establishing two-way traffic on 10th St. below Shipley; and re-constructing sidewalks with lighting and street trees.

C. King and Orange, MLK to 13th Street – These streets are the major corridors in Wilmington's central business district. It is the project's goal to greatlyimprove the transit rider’s experience, thereby increasing usage. This will be done by installing state-of-the art bus shelters; making sidewalk and crosswalkimprovements; and providing better lighting and streetscaping.

D. / E. Market Street, Phase II (MLK Blvd. to 9th Street and 11th Street to 16th Street) and Market Street (9th Street to 11th Street) - These projects will re-introducevehicles to this area and allow for parking along Wilmington's main spine in the central business district to aid in the economic re-development of the area. Pedestrian andstreetscaping enhancements are also part of the project. The project will also be consistent with the plan to build a steel wheel trolley along the length of Market St.

F. Walnut Street, MLK to 16th Street – Walnut St. is a major inbound route to the central business district. This project will improve its function by enhancing the roadwaygeometry (re-striping and re-assignment of lanes) as well as provide for safe pedestrian and transit uses. It's design will be consistent with the adjacent Wilmington CenterIII project.

G. Signalization - This project includes the upgrading of the existing traffic control system along major arterials with demand-activated, computer-controlled signals forimproved circulation, as well as upgrading signals citywide with new stanchions and signals to bring them to state-of-the-art levels for improved performance and safety.Signals will provide priority cycling for buses and a pre-empt for emergency vehicles. The existing sidewalks will be modified to meet ADA requirements at signalizedintersections.

H. US202 Broom Street to I-95 - Includes channelization and creation of a “boulevard” on US202 south of I-95 heading into Wilmington.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The projects will improve the intermodal environment between city neighborhoods and employment centers; create safer vehicular/pedestrianenvironment; and improve the visual appearance of the streets.

202

LOC

US

TS

T

SHEARMAN ST

BIR

DSTNANCY CT

ST

CHANDLER

LM ST

LAFAYETTE BLVD

LORD ST

CURLETT ST

6TH ST

BELL ALLEY

ROUNDHOUSE LA

FTH

EA

RT

S

TST TA

TNA

LLST

ALM

ERR

OW

VAN RACE ST HU

T

BU

EN

AV

I S JES

ST

RO

DN

EYST

14TH ST

14TH ST

13TH ST

13TH ST

MCCAULEY ST

8TH ST

8TH ST

7TH ST

7TH ST

10TH ST

10TH ST

9TH ST

9TH ST

12TH ST

6TH ST

6TH ST

5TH ST

5TH ST

2ND ST

ST

3RD ST

3RD ST

ROBINSONAR

MO

NR

OE

ST

MA

DIS

ON

ST

MA

DIS

ON

ST

JEFF

ER

SO

NS

T

WE

ST

ST

WE

ST

ST

CH

AMBE

RLI

N

TATN

ALL

ST

TATN

ALL

ST

OR

AN

GE

ST

OR

AN

GE

STC

HIP

PEY

ST

SH

IPLE

YS

T

SH

IPL

EY

ST

BAS

SET

TS

T

MA

RK

ET

ST

MA

RK

ET

ST

FRE

NC

HST

FRE

NC

HST

LOM

BAR

DS

T

GU

YE

RA

VE

PIN

ES

T

KIR

KWO

OD

ST

BEN

NE

TTST

BU

TTO

NW

OO

DS

T

DECATUR ST

T

PHE

ALD

LOC

UST

CHU

RCH

PIN

EJESS

UP

SPRU

13TH

17

22ND

STST

MAB

EL16TH

ST

PO

PLA

R

ST

JUS

TIS

ON

ST

MA

DIS

ON

ST

ST

CH

ERR

YS

T

JAC

KSO

N

AD

AM

S

KIRKAVE

ST

NB

UR

EN

ST

ST

PLEASANT ST

PO

RTE

RS

T

ST

SO

UTH

S

FO

U

BE

EC

A.

A.

A.

B

C

C

CC

B

D

E

F

F

202

LOC

US

TS

T

SHEARMAN ST

BIR

DSTNANCY CT

ST

CHANDLER

LM ST

LAFAYETTE BLVD

LORD ST

CURLETT ST

6TH ST

BELL ALLEY

ROUNDHOUSE LA

FTH

EA

RT

S

TST TA

TNA

LLST

ALM

ERR

OW

VAN RACE ST HU

T

BU

EN

AV

I S JES

ST

RO

DN

EYST

14TH ST

14TH ST

13TH ST

13TH ST

MCCAULEY ST

8TH ST

8TH ST

7TH ST

7TH ST

10TH ST

10TH ST

9TH ST

9TH ST

12TH ST

6TH ST

6TH ST

5TH ST

5TH ST

2ND ST

ST

3RD ST

3RD ST

ROBINSONAR

MO

NR

OE

ST

MA

DIS

ON

ST

MA

DIS

ON

ST

JEFF

ER

SO

NS

T

WE

ST

ST

WE

ST

ST

CH

AMBE

RLI

N

TATN

ALL

ST

TATN

ALL

ST

OR

AN

GE

ST

OR

AN

GE

STC

HIP

PEY

ST

SH

IPLE

YS

T

SH

IPL

EY

ST

BAS

SET

TS

T

MA

RK

ET

ST

MA

RK

ET

ST

FRE

NC

HST

FRE

NC

HST

LOM

BAR

DS

T

GU

YE

RA

VE

PIN

ES

T

KIR

KWO

OD

ST

BEN

NE

TTST

BU

TTO

NW

OO

DS

T

DECATUR ST

T

PHE

ALD

LOC

UST

CHU

RCH

PIN

EJESS

UP

SPRU

13TH

17

22ND

STST

MAB

EL16TH

ST

PO

PLA

R

ST

JUS

TIS

ON

ST

MA

DIS

ON

ST

ST

CH

ERR

YS

T

JAC

KSO

N

AD

AM

S

KIRKAVE

ST

NB

UR

EN

ST

ST

PLEASANT ST

PO

RTE

RS

T

ST

SO

UTH

S

FO

U

BE

EC

A.

A.

A.

B

C

C

CC

B

D

E

F

F

202

FERNWOOD

ST

MONROE

STST

PL

ST

STST

ST

JEFFERSON

FRANKLIN

HARRISON

VANBUREN

ST

ST

COLE

RID

GEBYR

ON

OVER

LY

LONDON

RU

RD

RD

LA

ED ERSE

TRD

RD

ALAPOCASDR

NORTH

PARK

STA

DIU

M

DR

STADIUM

DR

PARK

24TH23RD

22ND

19TH

21ST

20 TH

MC

CAABE

AVEMONROE

MADISON

25TH

26TH26TH

27TH

2 8TH

29TH

STSTST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

STO

NE

TOWER

LA

CA

RL

RD

CANTERA

STONE HILL

RD

GRANITE RD

SCHOOL

RD

BROOM PL

FRANKLINPL

VANBUREN

BAR

RETT

BAR

RETT

ST

30TH

31ST

32ND34TH

33RD

35TH

36TH

37TH

38TH

3SSST

ST

ST

STST

ST

ST TO

DDSLA

EA

CRESTON PLZEBLEY PL

MADISON

HH

202

FERNWOOD

ST

MONROE

STST

PL

ST

STST

ST

JEFFERSON

FRANKLIN

HARRISON

VANBUREN

ST

ST

COLE

RID

GEBYR

ON

OVER

LY

LONDON

RU

RD

RD

LA

ED ERSE

TRD

RD

ALAPOCASDR

NORTH

PARK

STA

DIU

M

DR

STADIUM

DR

PARK

24TH23RD

22ND

1 9TH

21ST

20 TH

MC

CAABE

AVEMONROE

MADISON

25TH

26TH26TH

27TH

2 8TH

29TH

STSTST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

STO

NE

TOWER

LA

CA

RL

RD

CANTERA

STONE HILL

RD

GRANITE RD

SCHOOL

RD

BROOM PL

FRANKLINPL

VANBUREN

BAR

RETT

BAR

RETT

ST

30TH

3 1ST

32ND34TH

33RD

35TH

36TH

37TH

38TH

3SSST

ST

ST

STST

ST

ST TO

DDSLA

EA

CRESTON PLZEBLEY PL

MADISON

HH

WILMINGTON TRAFFIC CALMING AND PEDESTRIAN/TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)

County: New CastleMunicipality: WilmingtonProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Senatorial District: 2, 3

WILMINGTON TRAFFIC CALMING AND PEDESTRIAN/TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)

EST COSTINDIVIDUAL PROJECT TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007SEGMENTS FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 193 1,063 0 875

A. 4th Street , Downtown 100% ST 50 PD 50Wilmington 700 PE 700

FHWA 2,800 C 2,800

B. Delaware Ave., Monroe St. to Walnut St. 100% ST 30 PD 30Wilmington 170 PE 170

FHWA 2,400 C 2,400

C. King & Orange Sts – MLK to 13th St 80% FHWA 95 PD 9580% FHWA 600 PE 60080% FHWA 3,000 C 3,000

D. Market Street – (Phase II) MLK to to 9th St. 100% ST 50 PD 5011th St. to 16th St. Wilmington 420 PE 420

FHWA 1,680 C 1,680

E. Market Street – 9th to 11th St. Wilmington 360 PE 360FHWA 1,800 C 1,800

F. Walnut Street, MLK to 16th St. 100% ST 54 PD 54Wilmington 340 PE 340

FHWA 1,700 C 1,700

G. Signalization 100% FHWA 1,207 PE 1,114 93100% FHWA 12,203 C 7,559 2,394 2,250

H. US202, Broom Street to I-95 100% ST 363 PE 363100% ST 111 R/W 111

80% FHWA 3,821 C 3,821

All $ X 1,000

BIR

DSTNANCY CT

BELL ALLEY

ROUNDHOUSE LA

AVE

NU

EO

FTH

EA

RT

S

WE

ST

ST

TATN

ALL

STO

RA

NG

ES

T

MARSHALL ST

WA

RN

ERS

BROW

NTOWN

TRU

CK

ROUTE

2ND ST

3RD ST

ROBINSON S

PO

PLA

R

MA F

WATER ST

JUS

TI

MA

DI

OAK ST

BEECH STFRA

NK

FRA

NK

COLUMBIAAVE

BU

TTO

N

A STHOWARD ST LO

MBA

RD

ST

SPR

UC

EST

MA

DIS

ON

ST

SO

UTH

ST

FOU

ND

ARY

ST

BEE

CH

ST

BEECH ST

OAK

STSTR

OU

DS

T

CE

DA

RS

T

5THAV

E

6THAV

E

E ST

BROWN ST

WRIGHT ST

COLMAN ST

ABC

ED

F

H

I

I

G

BIR

DSTNANCY CT

BELL ALLEY

ROUNDHOUSE LA

AVE

NU

EO

FTH

EA

RT

S

WE

ST

ST

TATN

ALL

STO

RA

NG

ES

T

MARSHALL ST

WA

RN

ERS

BROW

NTOWN

TRU

CK

ROUTE

2ND ST

3RD ST

ROBINSON S

PO

PLA

R

MA F

WATER ST

JUS

TI

MA

DI

OAK ST

BEECH STFRA

NK

FRA

NK

COLUMBIAAVE

BU

TTO

N

A STHOWARD ST LO

MBA

RD

ST

SPR

UC

EST

MA

DIS

ON

ST

SO

UTH

ST

FOU

ND

ARY

ST

BEE

CH

ST

BEECH ST

OAK

STSTR

OU

DS

T

CE

DA

RS

T

5THAV

E

6THAV

E

E ST

BROWN ST

WRIGHT ST

COLMAN ST

ABC

ED

F

H

I

I

G

WILMINGTON RIVERFRONT / TRANSIT CENTER

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:

A. Wilmington Transit Center, Market Street toWalnut Street– The goal of this project is toprovide better circulation for cars and buses aswell as provide for safer pedestrian connections.This will be done through removal of the WalnutSt. "sweep", making Market St. two-way south ofMLK, Jr. Blvd; improved crosswalks; betterlighting and better directional signage. This areais important as it is the hub of transportationactivity in the city.

B. Wilmington Transit Center – Bus StagingArea Facility – This staging facility encouragesmulti-modal transportation in the area due to itsproximity to the train station and other pedestrianlinks.

C. Water Street, Shipley Street to West Street -Water street improvements are needed to linknewly completed S. Madison and West St. to therecently completed Tubman-Garrett Park andTransit Center areas. Water Street also fronts adevelopment area, which requires transportationinfrastructure improvements. The design willprovide new pavement, improved drainage, pedestrian enhancements, streetscaping and controlled parking -- all elements which presently do not exist.

D. West Street Connector Extension - The West Street Connector Extension is a continuation of the South Madison West Street Connector. It runs from South MadisonStreet to Beech Street and provides for a secondary spine in the difficult-to-access Riverfront area. This infrastructure improvement supports the redevelopment of thenorthern bank of the Christina River. It will result in better vehicular access -- especially for special events -- which draws many visitors to the Riverfront.

E. West Street Connector Extension – Streetscape, South Madison to Stadium Drive This project completes the Connector Extension project by providing the necessarysidewalks, lighting, and trees for a pedestrian-friendly environment. It encourages pedestrian movement and complements the other transportation projects in the area.

WILMINGTON RIVERFRONT / TRANSIT CENTER (CONTINUED)

F. Browntown Pedestrian Walkway from Community Center to Stadium Area - This project provides a critical pedestrian link from the nearby community to theRiverfront Arts Center, Frawley Stadium, and other Riverfront attractions. It will construct pathways that are safe for pedestrians and encourage more pedestrian, ratherthan vehicular, movement in the area. The community is presently separated from the Riverfront by railroad tracks and the I-95 Viaduct.

G. Riverwalk VII– from Arts Boulevard to the end of Shipyard Shops - This continuation of the Riverwalk extends along the Christina River's northern bank adjacent tothe redevelopment's retail area known as the Shipyard Shops. The Riverwalk serves as the primary access to the shops from the river side. It further supports pedestrianaccess on the recently completed Riverwalk from the Transit Center and Tubman-Garrett Park to the retail area.

H. Riverwalk VIII– South of Shipyard Shops through Peterson Wildlife Preserve – The final portion of the Riverwalk will connect the Shipyard Shops to the EducationCenter at the Governor Peterson Wildlife Preserve. This provides pedestrian-friendly access to a wildlife refuge area and will be consistent with the designs of previousRiverwalk phases.

I. Market Street and Walnut Street Bridge Sidewalks – The walkway on these bridges and their approaches must be improved for safe pedestrian use. Due to pendingoffice developments on the south bank of the Christina Rivers (just south of the bridges), it is important for these links to be made. Just north of the bridges are the TransitCenter, Tubman-Garrett Park, the new Justice Center, and the central business district.

J. Interstate Access - With the continuing development of Wilmington's Riverfront, access for local and regional travelers becomes increasingly important for thisdevelopment to succeed. This on-going study allows the examination of option to new or improved connections from the area to I-95 and I-495.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The success of Wilmington’s redevelopment of this area depends on intermodal transportation improvements. The Riverwalk provides acritical pedestrian link from the Wilmington Transit Center and Riverfront Park to riverfront attractions like Frawley Stadium, the Arts Center, Shipyard Shops, restaurants, andentertainment.

County: New CastleMunicipality: WilmingtonProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 3Senatorial District: 3, 13

WILMINGTON RIVERFRONT / TRANSIT CENTER (CONTINUED)

EST COSTFMB ID INDIVIDUAL PROJECT TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR SEGMENTS FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 12,905 6,350 600 0

Program Development 100% ST 300 PLAN 100 100 100

20-121-02 A. Wilmington Trans Center 100% ST 450 PE 450Market St. to Walnut St 100% WILM. 300 PE 300

100% ST 850 ENV/R/W 850100% ST 4,900 C 4,900

B. Wilmington Trans Center 100% ST 200 PE 200Bus Staging Area 100% ST 2,150 C 2,150

C. Water St, - Shipley to West Sts. 100% ST 300 PE 300100% WILM 200 R/W 200

100% ST 1,200 C 1,200

99-121-02 D. West St. Connector Extension 100% ST 400 ENV 400100% ST 790 R/W 790100% ST 2,800 C 535 2,365

E. West St. Connector Extension 100% ST 650 PE 650Streetscape – S. Madison Dr to 100% ST 1,000 ENV 500 500Stadium Drive 100% ST 250 R/W 250

100% ST 4,400 C 4,400

F. Browntown PedWalkway 100% ST 75 PE 75Community Center to Stadium 100% ST 50 ENV 50

100% ST 50 R/W 15 35100% ST 475 C 475

G. Riverwalk VII from Arts Blvd. 100% ST 750 C 750To end of Shipyard Shops

H. Riverwalk VIII – from Shipyard 100% ST 600 PE 600Shops through Peterson Preserve 100% ST 3,280 C 3,280

I. Market and Walnut Sts. Bridges 100% ST 150 PE 150100% ST 600 C 600

J. Interstate Access 100% ST 100 100

All $ X 1,000

CHURCHMAN’S CROSSING TRANSIT FACILITIES

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: On June 29, 2000, the inauguration of rail servicewithin Churchman’s Crossing began. The establishment of the Fairplay Station atChurchman’s Crossing is an addition to existing SEPTA R2 commuter service betweenNewark, Wilmington, and Claymont to Central Philadelphia. The rail station isas an important improvement towards providing transportation alternatives tothe Churchman’s area community. The station also has integrated bus andshuttles providing connections adjacent to the new platform.

The next phase of the project will be the development of a transit center facility.This facility is projected to include both small-scale retail and servicebusinesses on the ground floor and offices on the upper floors. A transportationsales outlet center will also be located there and provide transit serviceinformation and amenities, creating an attractive transit center to focus onserving and attracting rail patrons. A parking garage is also planned as a sharedfacility with the private development (office complex) to minimize land impacts andmaximize open space.

The Fairplay Station improvements are being finalized and will include slope treatment behindthe platform and additional improvement to the pavilions. Future improvements to the stationwill include the addition of a speaker system on the platform, as well as further track improvements.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:

Fairplay Station provides a viable alternative for riders who would normally travel to this area by car on I-95, helping mitigate congestion along the I-95 corridor.The new station will provides another transportation choice for the Churchman’s area. Coordinated bus service ensures timely delivery of employees to area businesses, whichcan also reduce roadway congestion. The Churchman’s Study and discussions with area business leaders have identified these transportation improvements as importantelements in trying to handle future travel demands in the face of rising traffic projections. The inclusion of a transit center into the design will provide the support servicesnecessary to make this an even better transportation attraction and assist in producing increases in rail and bus ridership in the area.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 3, 14, 16, 18, 24, 25Senatorial District: 3, 9, 10, 11, 13

CHURCHMAN’S CROSSING TRANSIT FACILITIES (CONTINUED)

FMB ID INDIVIDUAL EST COST CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR PROJECT FUNDING TO COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ

PROJ # SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TTF0 6,454 0 0 0

Rail Station 100% ST 3,854 C 3,854

Public Announcement System 100% ST 30 C 30

Concrete Tie Improvement 100% ST 2,600 C 2,600From Newark to Wilm.

Track A, Landscape Imp’s 100% ST 30 R/W 30

Fairplay Station Slope Treat 100% ST 80 C 80

All $ X 1,000

13

9A

495

L

CLA

YMO

NT

ST TIN

AAV

E

MILLERS LANORTH STCENTER ST

SOUTH ST

ALBANY AVEHARRISBURG AVEDOVER AVE

WIL

MIN

GT

ON

AVE

BU

TTO

NW

OO

DS

TO

WN

SEN

DS

T

PEARL STD ST

C ST

B ST A ST

BR

AD

FOR

DS

T

CH

UR

CH

ST

GR

EE

NS

T

CL

AY

MO

NT

ST

NEWYORK AVE

GARASCHES LA

13

9A

495

L

CLA

YMO

NT

ST TIN

AAV

E

MILLERS LANORTH STCENTER ST

SOUTH ST

ALBANY AVEHARRISBURG AVEDOVER AVE

WIL

MIN

GT

ON

AVE

BU

TTO

NW

OO

DS

TO

WN

SEN

DS

T

PEARL STD ST

C ST

B ST A ST

BR

AD

FOR

DS

T

CH

UR

CH

ST

GR

EE

NS

T

CL

AY

MO

NT

ST

NEWYORK AVE

GARASCHES LA

PORT OF WILMINGTON

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The Port of Wilmington has beeninvolved in the import/export automobile trade for over twenty years. Inrecent years there have been two developing trends in this trade that willsignificantly impact Wilmington’s future in this business. First, there hasbeen a consolidation of a number of car companies worldwide. The recentChrysler/Daimler merger, the potential purchase of Volvo by Volkswagen,the General Motors interest in Asian car makes and others suggest aconsolidation of logistics routings will develop in the near future, likelyleading to fewer port calls for ocean carriers. The AutoPort facility hasbeen able to maintain its position in the export trade while others haveupgraded their port processing and vehicle facilities to accommodate manufacturer demandsfor quality.

In FY 2001 $10 million was authorized for the first phase of the AutoBerth construction.The second phase (of three) will be funded in FY 2002 for $15,000. It is anticipated thatanother $2.5 million will be needed to complete in FY 2003.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To maintain the Autoport as a viable commercial entity in the import/export automobile trade.

County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 2,3Senatorial District: 2

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 15,000 0 0 0

100% ST 15,000 15,000

OTHER 2,500 2,500

All $ X 1,000

82

100

141

LEY

LL RD

MO

NT

CH

AN

I NR

D

NEWBRIDGE

RD

ROCKLANDRD

BLA

CK

G

KE

NN

ETT

PIK

E

EA

ST

LA

THAXTE

N

LAENSIN

GTON

N

PONDSLA

CARILLON

CT

MEDFORD RD

WELWIN RD

DE

XTER

RD

COUNTRY CLUBD

CR

KERFOOTFARMRD

ROTHBURYRDCOUNTRY CLUB DR

FALK

IRK

EDG

DR

BU

CK

RID

GE

DR

BAR

LEY MIL

L

DR

LA

DR

LAKEVIEW

INGFIELD

VALL

EYG

RE

ENDR

CA

RR

IAG

ERD

VA

LMY

LA

HA

LSE

YD

R

LAS

TR

AD

A TE

RA

MO

GALE

LAL

A

LA

LA

BE

LLA

NT

CT

FAIRTHORNELAORIENTE

AVE

RD

BARLEY

WA

RW

I

HE

AT

HE

RD

R

ARDLEIGH

DR

BROOKVALLEYRD

BR

OO

KM

EA

DO

WR

D

SUNNYSIDERDWH

EEL

OC

KL

A

GR

EE

NR

OC

KDRMONTCHAN DR

OLD CHURCH

RD

PRE

SIDE

NTI

AL DRSEN

ITOR

IAL

DR

CONGRESSIONAL

DR

KENT

82

100

141

LEY

LL RD

MO

NT

CH

AN

I NR

D

NEWBRIDGE

RD

ROCKLANDRD

BLA

CK

G

KE

NN

ETT

PIK

E

EA

ST

LA

THAXTE

N

LAENSIN

GTON

N

PONDSLA

CARILLON

CT

MEDFORD RD

WELWIN RD

DE

XTER

RD

COUNTRY CLUBD

CR

KERFOOTFARMRD

ROTHBURYRDCOUNTRY CLUB DR

FALK

IRK

EDG

DR

BU

CK

RID

GE

DR

BAR

LEY MIL

L

DR

LA

DR

LAKEVIEW

INGFIELD

VALL

EYG

RE

ENDR

CA

RR

IAG

ERD

VA

LMY

LA

HA

LSE

YD

R

LAS

TR

AD

A TE

RA

MO

GALE

LAL

A

LA

LA

BE

LLA

NT

CT

FAIRTHORNELAORIENTE

AVE

RD

BARLEY

WA

RW

I

HE

AT

HE

RD

R

ARDLEIGH

DR

BROOKVALLEYRD

BR

OO

KM

EA

DO

WR

D

SUNNYSIDERDWH

EEL

OC

KL

A

GR

EE

NR

OC

KDRMONTCHAN DR

OLD CHURCH

RD

PRE

SIDE

NTI

AL DRSEN

ITOR

IAL

DR

CONGRESSIONAL

DR

KENT

SR141, KENNETT PIKE TO US202

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This segment of SR141 includes the Tyler McConnellBridge, a two-lane structure crossing the Brandywine River near theDuPont Experimental Station and the Hagley Museum. This segment ofSR141 is a critical link in supporting the major business centers alongSR141 from I95 to US202, including DuPont and Astra-Zeneca. Onlybeing two lanes, the Tyler McConnell Bridge has limited capacity tosupport current traffic volumes and will continue to act as a pinch point inthis segment of the corridor. As part of our public outreach effort, aWorking Group has been created to assist the Department in thedevelopment of a multi-modal solution to this problem, while minimizingthe impacts of any proposed solution to the many environmental andhistoric resources of this area. Future public workshops will be scheduled to present informationon various alternatives. These will include items such as operational improvements associatedwith the DuPont Station entrances and the Rte100 intersection; transit and ITMS for the SR141corridor; capacity improvements associated with the Tyler McConnell Bridge; and other corridorimprovements under construction.A complete assessment of the impacts of these various alternatives and packages of improvementswill be made in order to develop a final recommendation on the preferred transportation solution to the Governor and Legislative – as called for in the FY 2001 Bond Bill.

County: New CastleProgram Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 6,4,11Senatorial District: 1,4, 6

FMB I.D. EST COST CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR FUNDING TO COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ

PROJ # IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TTF0 4,166 12,339 0 0

80% FHWA 100 PLAN 100100% ST 500 PLAN 500100% ST 7,000 PE 7,000100% ST 8,000 R/W 8,000

80% AC FHWA 58,493 C 61,694

All $ X 1,000

SR141 / US202 AREA IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Rockland Road to US202 – The approved Blue Ball Properties Master Plan has outlined recommendations fortransportation and park and recreation improvements in this area associated with expansion of the Astra Zeneca complex. The recommendations, theimprovements will be designed in phases:

• 1 – The SR141 / US202 work program will include stormwater management (SWM) throughout the area.

• 2 - West Side Roads – Includes new West Side Park Road, relocation of Rockland Road, West Side Park greenways, and stormwater management.

• 3 - East Side Roads – Includes new East Side Park Road, relocation of Weldin Road, relocation of Carruthers Lane, and East Side Park greenways.

• 4 - Utility Relocations – Development of a utility corridor to relocate utilities from US202 to West Side Park Road

• 5 - US202 – Improvements to US202, between I-95 Ramp and north of Powder Mill Road, includes new underpasses on US202 at Foulk Road and East Side Park Road;and improvements at the US202/Powder Mill Road intersection.

• 6 - SR141 Spur – Construction of a new road to connect SR141 and US202 at Foulk Road.

• The Parks and Recreation element of the improvements will include:� Restoration of the Blue Ball Dairy Barn located to the southwest of of the intersection of US202 and Rockland Road� Construction of a portion of the Northern Delaware greenway through the Blue Ball properties which will link the City of Wilmington at the Brandywine River.

County: New CastleProgram Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 4, 6Senatorial District: 1, 4

202

ROCKW

O

RD

FOU

LKR

WELDIN RD

DR

CO

LER

IDG

E

BYR

ON

CO

VER

LY

LONDON

MA

TSON

MATSON RUN

PKW

YE

AP

KWY

RU

N

RD

RD

RD

LA

TALLEY CT

FIELDING

WYCLIF

LOWELL

WHITTIER

TENN

YS

ON

EM

ER

SO

N

MIL

TON

DR

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

CH

ANN

ING

RD

LITTLEROCK

BIG ROCKDR

PEBBLEDR

EDGEWOOD

RD OXF

OR

D

PLSO

ME

RSE

T

NO

RR

ISR

DR

D

DARTMOOR D

NORWOO

MALD

CRANBROOK

TALLEY HILL LA

DANSFIELD DR

SYLVAN US DR

DIN

CI IR

EL

DIN

CI IR

DR

BEECHWOLD AVE

YD

R

UN

RD

AL

DC

IRCAPANO CT

GR

AY

RO

CK

DE

LW

OO

DR

DP

ENN

LA

AR

RO

NC

I R

OLI V

EC

I R

BE

LV

IOR

CI R

CA

RO

TH

ER

SLA

ALAPOCAS

DR

ON

E

TOWER

LA

GRANITE RD

SCHO

OL

RD

BROOMPL

FRANKLINPL

VANBUREN

40T

IRVING

DR

HAWTHORNE

Contract 3

202

ROCKW

O

RD

FOU

LKR

WELDIN RD

DR

CO

LER

IDG

E

BYR

ON

CO

VER

LY

LONDON

MA

TSON

MATSON RUN

PKW

YE

AP

KWY

RU

N

RD

RD

RD

LA

TALLEY CT

FIELDING

WYCLIF

LOWELL

WHITTIER

TENN

YS

ON

EM

ER

SO

N

MIL

TON

DR

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

CH

ANN

ING

RD

LITTLEROCK

BIG ROCKDR

PEBBLEDR

EDGEWOOD

RD OXF

OR

D

PLSO

ME

RSE

T

NO

RR

ISR

DR

D

DARTMOOR D

NORWOO

MALD

CRANBROOK

TALLEY HILL LA

DANSFIELD DR

SYLVAN US DR

DIN

CI IR

EL

DIN

CI IR

DR

BEECHWOLD AVE

YD

R

UN

RD

AL

DC

IRCAPANO CT

GR

AY

RO

CK

DE

LW

OO

DR

DP

ENN

LA

AR

RO

NC

I R

OLI V

EC

I R

BE

LV

IOR

CI R

CA

RO

TH

ER

SLA

ALAPOCAS

DR

ON

E

TOWER

LA

GRANITE RD

SCHO

OL

RD

BROOMPL

FRANKLINPL

VANBUREN

40T

IRVING

DR

HAWTHORNE

Contract 3

202

D

FOU

LKR

D

WELDIN RD

COLE

RID

GE

BYRON

COV

ERLY

LOND

MATSON

MATSON

RD

RD

RD

LA

TALLEY C

F

EDGEWOOD

RD OXF

ORD

PLSO

MER

SET

NORR

ISR

DRD

T

SYLVANUS

BEECHWOLD AV

BEDFORD BLBAR

DY

DR

KE

YR

UN

RD

SADDLE

GER

ALD

CIRCAPANO CT

GR

AY

RO

CK

DE

LWO

OD

RD

PEN

NLA

AR

RO

NC

I R

OLI V

EC

IR

BE

LVIO

RC

IR

CA

RO

THE

RS

LA

ALAPOCASDR

GRANITE R

SCHOO

LRD

202

D

FOU

LKR

D

WELDIN RD

COLE

RID

GE

BYRON

COV

ERLY

LOND

MATSON

MATSON

RD

RD

RD

LA

TALLEY C

F

EDGEWOOD

RD OXF

ORD

PLSO

MER

SET

NORR

ISR

DRD

T

SYLVANUS

BEECHWOLD AV

BEDFORD BLBAR

DY

DR

KE

YR

UN

RD

SADDLE

GER

ALD

CIRCAPANO CT

GR

AY

RO

CK

DE

LWO

OD

RD

PEN

NLA

AR

RO

NC

I R

OLI V

EC

IR

BE

LVIO

RC

IR

CA

RO

THE

RS

LA

ALAPOCASDR

GRANITE R

SCHOO

LRD

202

RO

CKWO

ODRD

RD

DC

FOU

LKR

D

WELDIN RD

DR

CARILLON

CT

RDDEVONSHIRE RDOLD POINT RD D W

OAKWOOD

D

GUMWO

PELHAM R

WELLINGT

TR

D

OKL

AH

OM

AA

VE

DA

KO

TA

AV

E

NE

VA

DA

DR

HOLLANDDR

COLORADO AVE

GLENWOODAVEMEDFORD RD

WELWIN RD

DE

XT

ERR

D

COUNTRYCLUB

YORK RD

HURST RDHAVERFORD

RD

BE

DF

OR

DRD

JACK

SON

BLVD

ACRERD

LONGPIERCE

CO

LER

IDG

E

BYRON

CO

VER

LY

LONDON

MATSO

N

MATSON

RUN

PK

WY

PKW

YR

UN

RD

RD

RD

LA

TALL

EY CT

FIELDING

WYCLIF

LOWELL

WHITTIER

TEN

NY

SON

ME

RS

ON

TON

MILT

ON

DR

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

NNIN

GR

D

L ITTLEROCK

BIGROCKDR

PEBBLEDR

D

EDGEWOOD

RD OXF

OR

D PL

SO

MER

SE

T

NO

RR

ISR

DR

D

DARTMOOR DR

NORWOOD DR

MALDEN DR

CRANBROOK

TALLEY HILL LA

DANSFIELD DR

SYLVANUS DR

WE

LD

I NC

II R

WE

LD

INC

IIR

BEZEL RD

HU

MM

OC

K

CTD

R

BEECHWOLD AVE

BEDFORD BLVD

GU

NN

ING

DR

SIMON RD

SIMON RD

FO

RE

ST

DA

L ED

R

WOODLEY CIR

TA

LLE

YR

D

LO

MB

AR

DY

DR

TU

RK

EY

RU

NR

D

SADDLE LA

GE

RA

LD

CIR

CAPANO CT

GR

AY

RO

CK

DE

LW

OO

DR

DP

EN

NLA

AR

RO

NC

IR

OLIV

EC

I R

BE

LV

IOR

CIR

CA

RO

TH

ER

SLA

ALAPOCAS

DRHILL RD

ER

LA

GRANITERD

SCHO

OL

RD

MPL

L REN

IRVING

HAWTHORNE

Contract 5

202

RO

CKWO

ODRD

RD

DC

FOU

LKR

D

WELDIN RD

DR

CARILLON

CT

RDDEVONSHIRE RDOLD POINT RD D W

OAKWOOD

D

GUMWO

PELHAM R

WELLINGT

TR

D

OKL

AH

OM

AA

VE

DA

KO

TA

AV

E

NE

VA

DA

DR

HOLLANDDR

COLORADO AVE

GLENWOODAVEMEDFORD RD

WELWIN RD

DE

XT

ERR

D

COUNTRYCLUB

YORK RD

HURST RDHAVERFORD

RD

BE

DF

OR

DRD

JACK

SON

BLVD

ACRERD

LONGPIERCE

CO

LER

IDG

E

BYRON

CO

VER

LY

LONDON

MATSO

N

MATSON

RUN

PK

WY

PKW

YR

UN

RD

RD

RD

LA

TALL

EY CT

FIELDING

WYCLIF

LOWELL

WHITTIER

TEN

NY

SON

ME

RS

ON

TON

MILT

ON

DR

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

NNIN

GR

D

L ITTLEROCK

BIGROCKDR

PEBBLEDR

D

EDGEWOOD

RD OXF

OR

D PL

SO

MER

SE

T

NO

RR

ISR

DR

D

DARTMOOR DR

NORWOOD DR

MALDEN DR

CRANBROOK

TALLEY HILL LA

DANSFIELD DR

SYLVANUS DRW

EL

DI N

CII R

WE

LD

INC

II R

BEZEL RD

HU

MM

OC

K

CTD

R

BEECHWOLD AVE

BEDFORD BLVD

GU

NN

ING

DR

SIMON RD

SIMON RD

FO

RE

ST

DA

L ED

R

WOODLEY CIR

TA

LLE

YR

D

LO

MB

AR

DY

DR

TU

RK

EY

RU

NR

D

SADDLE LA

GE

RA

LD

CIR

CAPANO CT

GR

AY

RO

CK

DE

LW

OO

DR

DP

EN

NLA

AR

RO

NC

IR

OLIV

EC

I R

BE

LV

IOR

CIR

CA

RO

TH

ER

SLA

ALAPOCAS

DRHILL RD

ER

LA

GRANITERD

SCHO

OL

RD

MPL

L REN

IRVING

HAWTHORNE

Contract 5 202

GE

RD

RDB

FOU

LKR

D

W

CARILLON

CT

RD

DEVONSHIRE RDOLD POINT RD

MONTICELLO RDHE E

RD

WAVERLY

WELLINGTON

OAKWOOD

D

MEDFORD RD

WELWIN RD

DE

XTE

RR

D

WAYCROSS RD

COUNTRY

CLUB

DR

YORK RD

HURST RDHAVERFORD

RD

BE

DF

OR

DR

D

JAC

KSON

BLV

D

AC

RD

L

PIERCE

CA

RO

TH

ER

SLA

Contract 6

202

GE

RD

RDB

FOU

LKR

D

W

CARILLON

CT

RD

DEVONSHIRE RDOLD POINT RD

MONTICELLO RDHE E

RD

WAVERLY

WELLINGTON

OAKWOOD

D

MEDFORD RD

WELWIN RD

DE

XTE

RR

D

WAYCROSS RD

COUNTRY

CLUB

DR

YORK RD

HURST RDHAVERFORD

RD

BE

DF

OR

DR

D

JAC

KSON

BLV

D

AC

RD

L

PIERCE

CA

RO

TH

ER

SLA

Contract 6

SR141 / US202 AREA IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)

2 - West Side Roads 3 – East Side Roads

5 – SR141 / US202 and US202 6 – Spur Road

SR141 / US202 AREA IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)

INDIVIDUAL EST COST CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING TO COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJSEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TTF

0 0 0 0 0

Blue Ball Properties Master Plan• Work Program

Stormwater Management (SWM) 100% ST 500 PE 500

• Improvements 2-5 100% ST 8,423 PE 8,423

• 2 – West Side Roads 100% ST 13,029 C 13,029100% ST 5,000 SWM 5,000

• 3 – East Side Roads 100% ST 2,000 R/W 2,000100% ST 13,067 C 13,782

• 4 – Utility Relocations 100% ST 50 R/W 50100% ST 3,500 C 3,500

• 5 – US202/SR141 & US202 100% ST 500 R/W 52780% AC FHWA 33,629 C 36,427

• 6 – Spur Road 100% ST 962 PE 96280% FHWA 9,620 C 10,702

Parks and Recreation Element

• Work Program

Historic Preservation – Blue 100% ST 4,552 HIST 4,552Ball Barn Building

Greenway 100% ST 828 PE/C 828

All $ X 1,000

WILMINGTON TRANSIT CONNECTOR (TROLLEY)

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The Wilmington Trolleyroute is approximately two miles in length from the ChristinaRiverfront to 11th and 12th Streets. Wilmington’s trolley system willconnect the City’s three main activity centers: (1) the office area inthe northern part of the central business district alongDelaware/Washington Avenues; (2) the major commercial spine(Market Street) and Amtrak train station area; and (3) the Christinawaterfront area, which is being developed as an arts/entertainmentcenter. The (10) steel wheel replica trolleys will be powered by anoverhead electrical system and is expected to serve approximately760,000 paid trips annually.

A total of 23 potential station locations have been identified for study. Many of theselocations offer major transfer opportunities to other modes of travel, as well as theopportunity to provide neighborhood connections to the city’s major activity centers.

The proposed alignment will operate on reserved right-of-way along the ChristinaWaterfront; on streets through the existing commercial spine (Market Street); and willcirculate on 11th and 12th Streets in the city’s office center area to complete itscommercial loop. This alignment was selected through a comprehensive publicinvolvement process led by the City of Wilmington.

Total capital funding requirements (in 1999$’s) are $37.5 million with $4.2 million from the City, $3.7 million from private sources, $3.7 million from State transportationfunds, and the remainder from Federal Transit Administration (FTA) discretionary funding earmarked for new projects. The first $1 million in federal money was appropriatedwithin the FY 2000 federal budget.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The Wilmington Trolley will:• Support key state and city policy and planning goals.• Enhance the existing transportation system.• Strongly support recent and future economic development.• Encourage additional investment in this urban area.

The projected net annual operating cost is $1.5 million. 10% will come from the private sector; 10% from the City of Wilmington; and 80% from State transportation funds.The remaining $0.5 million in operating costs are expected to be funded from the farebox.

WILMINGTON TRANSIT CONNECTOR (TROLLEY) (CONTINUED)

County: New CastleProgram Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 2,3Senatorial District: 2,3

FMB ID EST COST CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR FUNDING TO COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ

PROJ # IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TTF0 420 2,382 1,428 0

DISC FTA 31,126 PE/C 2,000 5,000 14,129 9,997WILMINGTON 4,230 PE/C 250 170 2,382 1,428PRIVATE 4,230 C 420 2,382 1,428STATE 4,230 C 420 2,382 1,428

All $ X 1,000

BR137A ON K137 OVER DUCK CREEK, CLAYTON

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace existing timber bridge and provide scourprotection for foundation.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficientand ranks 15th on the bridge deficiency list.

County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 15,15Senatorial District: 28

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 17 56

100% ST 60 PE 64100% ST 17 R/W 17

80% FHWA 281 C 281

All $ X 1,000

15

W. D

UC

KC

RE

EK

RD

SCHOOL LA

W. COMMERCE ST

S. CARTERRD

WH

EAT

LEYS

PO

ND

RD

ST

HUDSONGAN

DER

DR SC

C.H.

PO

STATEALLEY

HIGHLAN

DAVE

WASHING

TONAVE

PEACHALLEY

WES

T

STAPP

LEAL

CLAYTONAVE

CHERR

YAL

WILSON

AVE

COLEM

ANST

LEEDSBLVD

RE

ED

ST

SMYRNA AVE

PEAR ALLEY

KIRKWOOD ST

PLUM ALLEY

HASLETT ST

RO

DN

EYS

T

RO

DN

EY

ST

BA

SS

ETT

ST

DU

MP

RD

COLMAR MANOR

SPRUANCE CITY

CEDARBR MO

OR

ES

LA

GLENWAY

AVE

MA

NOR

DR

ROXANNAVE

LAKEST

FRAZIER

ST

KENT

WAY

LAKE DR LAKE

CO

M

HAMIL

TON

WAY

MERR

ILL

WAY LA

KHAMIL

TON

RODN

EYST

ANTHO

NYLA FR

AZI

ERST

FIS

CULB

REATH

CLAYTON

AVE

MT

VERNON

MT

VERNO

COM

MER

CE

ST

STM

ULB

ERRYST

CUM

MINS

ST

HIGH

ST

HIGH

ST

NEWST

SCHOO

L

LAM

ARKETST

AWAR

E

LNUT

UNION

STST

LEXIN

GTON

AVE

MU

STARD

TDRROBERTS DR

G

NORTH

PETER

SON

BENSO

NST

DW

IGHT T

HOWARD

ST

CLEMENT

ST

UPHAMST

TURNERS ROW

KATESW

AY

CINDYLA

JOHNS

RD

LAKE DR W.

LAKEDR

W. M

AR

ILY

NR

D

OW

EN

SB

RO

OK

ED

R

KENT

WAY

15

W. D

UC

KC

RE

EK

RD

SCHOOL LA

W. COMMERCE ST

S. CARTERRD

WH

EAT

LEYS

PO

ND

RD

ST

HUDSONGAN

DER

DR SC

C.H.

PO

STATEALLEY

HIGHLAN

DAVE

WASHING

TONAVE

PEACHALLEY

WES

T

STAPP

LEAL

CLAYTONAVE

CHERR

YAL

WILSON

AVE

COLEM

ANST

LEEDSBLVD

RE

ED

ST

SMYRNA AVE

PEAR ALLEY

KIRKWOOD ST

PLUM ALLEY

HASLETT ST

RO

DN

EYS

T

RO

DN

EY

ST

BA

SS

ETT

ST

DU

MP

RD

COLMAR MANOR

SPRUANCE CITY

CEDARBR MO

OR

ES

LA

GLENWAY

AVE

MA

NOR

DR

ROXANNAVE

LAKEST

FRAZIER

ST

KENT

WAY

LAKE DR LAKE

CO

M

HAMIL

TON

WAY

MERR

ILL

WAY LA

KHAMIL

TON

RODN

EYST

ANTHO

NYLA FR

AZI

ERST

FIS

CULB

REATH

CLAYTON

AVEM

TVERNO

N

MT

VERNO

COM

MER

CE

ST

ST

MU

LBERRY

ST

CUM

MINS

ST

HIGH

ST

HIGH

ST

NEWST

SCHOO

L

LA

MARKET

ST

AWAR

E

LNUT

UNION

ST

ST

LEXIN

GTON

AVE

MU

STARD

TDRROBERTS DR

G

NORTH

PETER

SON

BENSO

NST

DW

IGHT T

HOWARD

ST

CLEMENT

ST

UPHAMST

TURNERS ROW

KATESW

AY

CINDYLA

JOHNS

RD

LAKE DR W.

LAKEDR

W. M

AR

ILY

NR

D

OW

EN

SB

RO

OK

ED

R

KENT

WAY

BR156A ON SAULSBURY ROAD (K156) OVER FORK BRANCH

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will focus on rehabilitation of theexisting deck by post-tensioning the glue laminate deck or using a similar technique to reducecracking and excessive deflection.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andranks 78th on the bridge deficiency list.

County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 29Senatorial District: 15,17

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 40 0 0 0

20-075-01 80% FHWA 200 C 200

All $ X 1,000

15

15

MCK

EERD

KEN

TON

RD

W. DENNEYS RD

YR

D

KENTON

RD

CENTRAL CHURCH RD

RDWINDING RIDGE

CA

RLISLE

DR

.

WATERFALL

DR.GRINDING W

HEEL

DR

.

GRISTMILL

PL.

GRISTM

ILL

MILLCREEK

CIR. DR

.

MIL

LCR

EEK

NIBLICKCT.MICHAELCT. DR

.

KENSIN

ARDSLEY DR.

ASH

BY

LA.

AR

DS

LEY

CIR

.

CR

OS

LE

YC

T.

COVERLY

TERR.

CO

VER

LYCT

.

COPELYCT.

R

DUPONTCH

BEECH HAVEN DR

ECH DR

TAMMIE DR

CAR

LISL

EDR

TAMMIEDR

BAY CIR. S.

EN ROC

15

15

MCK

EERD

KEN

TON

RD

W. DENNEYS RD

YR

D

KENTON

RD

CENTRAL CHURCH RD

RDWINDING RIDGE

CA

RLISLE

DR

.

WATERFALL

DR.GRINDING W

HEEL

DR

.

GRISTMILL

PL.

GRISTM

ILL

MILLCREEK

CIR. DR

.

MIL

LCR

EEK

NIBLICKCT.MICHAELCT. DR

.

KENSIN

ARDSLEY DR.

ASH

BY

LA.

AR

DS

LEY

CIR

.

CR

OS

LE

YC

T.

COVERLY

TERR.

CO

VER

LYCT

.

COPELYCT.

R

DUPONTCH

BEECH HAVEN DR

ECH DR

TAMMIE DR

CAR

LISL

EDR

TAMMIEDR

BAY CIR. S.

EN ROC

BR210A ON K208 OVER SHADES BRANCH, SOUTH OF MARYDEL

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace bridge with prestressed concrete structure onpile supported abutments. Raise roadway profile to eliminate flooding. Retain roadway fillwith sheet pile wall. Place guardrail at approaches and riprap atabutments.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficientand is functionally obsolete. The bridge is ranked 61st on the bridge

deficiency list.

County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 30Senatorial District: 15

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 147 0 0 0

100% ST 104 PE 104100% ST 8 R/W 8

80% FHWA 698 C 695

All $ X 1,000

MA

HA

NC

OR

NE

RR

D

SANDY BEND RD

SHA

DY

BR

IDG

ER

D

MUD MILL RD

STILL RD

PO

NY

TR

AC

KR

D

MA

HA

NC

OR

NE

RR

D

SANDY BEND RD

SHA

DY

BR

IDG

ER

D

MUD MILL RD

STILL RD

PO

NY

TR

AC

KR

D

BR348A ON POSTLES CORNER ROAD, NORTHEAST OF DOVER AIRFORCE BASE

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorated timber bridge with corrugatedmetal box. This bridge is located at one of the entrances to Dover AirForce Base and is the only outlet for a local trash removal business.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andcurrently ranks 22nd on the bridge deficiency list.

County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 32Senatorial District: 16, 17

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 202 0 0 0

98-075-02 100% ST 300 C 300

All $ X 1,000

9

BA

YSI

DE

DR

POSTLES CORNER RD

HOR

SEPONDRD

LAJESST

ST19th

ST

20th

13th ST

BE

h ST

10th

ST8t

hSTPAR

ISST

ST

ST

MAYS LA

JANESR

D

JANES

CIR

OUT OFCITY

9

BA

YSI

DE

DR

POSTLES CORNER RD

HOR

SEPONDRD

LAJESST

ST19th

ST

20th

13th ST

BE

h ST

10th

ST8t

hSTPAR

ISST

ST

ST

MAYS LA

JANESR

D

JANES

CIR

OUT OFCITY

CAMDEN / WYOMING TRUCK ROUTE INCLUDING WEST RAILROAD AVENUE

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:

A Truck Route Study has been completed and improvementrecommendations have been forwarded for design. Specificimprovements include signing, striping, and turning radii changes.These improvements will be combined with others listed below.

Camden Wyoming Avenue: Install automatic gates at each of thefour railroad crossings; install advance warning signs; and completesidewalks.

Southern Boulevard: Install at-grade automatic gates at the SouthernBoulevard rail crossing. This will also include completion of sidewalks on the northwestcorner and elimination of the stop sign for westbound traffic, thus making SouthernBoulevard a through movement.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To reduce the potential for rail/motor vehicle collisionsand improve safety at the rail crossings.

County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 34Senatorial District: 16

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 50 134 0

100% ST 72 PE 72100% ST 50 R/W 50

80% FHWA 672 C 672

All $ X 1,000

CAMDEN-WYOMING AVE

LL RD

VE

RD

CAMBRIDGE

RDCARTERCHAPELDR

LA

MEETINGHOUSE

LA

WE

ST

ST

CENTER ST

WE

EK

SD

R

TH

OR

NLE

YD

R

ST

WILLIAM ST

C.H.

PO

WILLOW

AVE

JAN

EK

AD

R

CE

DA

RLA

SOUTH ST

WE

SLE

YS

T

PR

AT

TIS

ST

STEVENS STAPPLE STPEACH STPLUM ST

APPLETREE LA

ME

AD

OW

AV

E

PIN

E ST

EAS

T

R.R

.A

VE

JEN

KIN

SD

RM

ECH

ANIC

ST

FRANKLINST

GRANTST

BROADST

THIRDST

LAKEDR

PRICE

CH

URC

HD

RM

ILL

ST

SEWAGE PLANT ST

MEDALLION CIR

C.0. HA

RR

ISO

NA

VE

NORTHSOUTH

DRCAMDEN-WYOMING AVE

LL RD

VE

RD

CAMBRIDGE

RDCARTERCHAPELDR

LA

MEETINGHOUSE

LA

WE

ST

ST

CENTER ST

WE

EK

SD

R

TH

OR

NLE

YD

R

ST

WILLIAM ST

C.H.

PO

WILLOW

AVE

JAN

EK

AD

R

CE

DA

RLA

SOUTH ST

WE

SLE

YS

T

PR

AT

TIS

ST

STEVENS STAPPLE STPEACH STPLUM ST

APPLETREE LA

ME

AD

OW

AV

E

PIN

E ST

EAS

T

R.R

.A

VE

JEN

KIN

SD

RM

ECH

ANIC

ST

FRANKLINST

GRANTST

BROADST

THIRDST

LAKEDR

PRICE

CH

URC

HD

RM

ILL

ST

SEWAGE PLANT ST

MEDALLION CIR

C.0. HA

RR

ISO

NA

VE

NORTHSOUTH

DR

GOVERNOR’S AVENUE, WEBB’S LANE TO WATER STREET, SAFETY

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project has been assigned to Dover/Kent MPO,who will work with the City of Dover and local residents to define and implement thisproject. Possible improvements include construction of curbs andgutters, sidewalks, closed drainage system, shoulder reconstruction,bridge replacement, and restriping, as well as some minor wideningimprovements (including intersection improvements at Water Street).The improvements may also include striping and signalization atGovernor’s Avenue and Water Street.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The recommendations of this study willfocus on improving safety, drainage, and signalization to promote multi-modal usage of this section of Governor’s Avenue.

County: KentMunicipality: DoverProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 32Senatorial District: 16, 17

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 400 0 926 0

100% ST 400 PE 40080% FHWA 4,632 C 4,632

All $ X 1,000

13A

113A

13

S. QU

EE

NST

WEBBS LA

W. WATER ST

BA

YR

D

NEW

BURTO

NR

D

HIGHVIEW AVE

AVE

NORTH STT

STEWART

CT

GOODEN

AVE

LAUREL

DR

ST

AT

ES

T

CA

PIT

ALAV

E

GA A

MA

ND

R TU

RN

ER

AL D

ER

RD

KESSERLING

MOCKINGBIRD

MIMOSA

MAYBERRY

PO

ST

BL

AVEAVE

AVE

LA

SHADOW

BA

KE

R

BLU

EB

EA

CH

FID

DL

ER

SG

RE

EN

WIN

TER

BER

RY

DO

GW

OO

D

DOGWOODAVE

CT

DR

TU

RN

CT

RD

CA

PIT

OL

PL

GOVERNORBLVD

PRESIDENT DR

CO

NG

RE

SS

PL

SEN

ATOR

AV

E

STA

TEC

IRW

AS

HIN

GTO

NPL

DO

VER

CIR

EV

ER

GR

EE

N

EVERG

REENCIR

DR

ROOSEVELT AVE

SACKARACKIN AVE

PINE ST

LOTIS

ST

PA

RK

AV

E

ORCHARD

AVE

HOPE ST

DOVER ST

NE

WS

T

SHERWO

OD CT

WAPLES AVE

KO

NSC

HAK

AVE

WO

ODFORD

DR

SH

AN

KR

DJ A

NE

KA

L A

WE

ST

VIE

WT

ER

R

TE

RR

TE

RR

SU

NS

ET

MO

NR

OE

WO

OD

SE

DG

E

RDWOODBURNCIR

WYOMING AVEBR

AD

FO

RD

ST

JEFFERSON

TERR

CH

ARLE

S DR

HOLLY DROAK DR YE

AR

SL

EY DR

CRESCENT DR

LYNNHAVENDR

RO

BER

TAA

V

CR

AWFO

RD

AVE

T

ST

ILL

AVE

NE

WC

AS

TLESUSSEX

COLLINSAXE

DR

RIV

ER

RD

STA

VE

BANK

KER

BIN

ST

ELM TERR

SC

DUPONT

STST

SH

OT

GU

N

ALL

EY

SOUTH ST

QU

EEN

ST

TE

R

A NC

E

INIM

A

T

ST

T

RODRIC

TERRACE

McB

RY

DR

McBRY CT

HUNTLEY CIR

RD

13A

113A

13

S. QU

EE

NST

WEBBS LA

W. WATER ST

BA

YR

D

NEW

BURTO

NR

D

HIGHVIEW AVE

AVE

NORTH STT

STEWART

CT

GOODEN

AVE

LAUREL

DR

ST

AT

ES

T

CA

PIT

ALAV

E

GA A

MA

ND

R TU

RN

ER

AL D

ER

RD

KESSERLING

MOCKINGBIRD

MIMOSA

MAYBERRYP

OS

TB

L

AVEAVE

AVE

LA

SHADOW

BA

KE

R

BLU

EB

EA

CH

FID

DL

ER

SG

RE

EN

WIN

TER

BER

RY

DO

GW

OO

D

DOGWOODAVE

CT

DR

TU

RN

CT

RD

CA

PIT

OL

PL

GOVERNORBLVD

PRESIDENT DR

CO

NG

RE

SS

PL

SEN

ATOR

AV

E

STA

TEC

IRW

AS

HIN

GTO

NPL

DO

VER

CIR

EV

ER

GR

EE

N

EVERG

REENCIR

DR

ROOSEVELT AVE

SACKARACKIN AVE

PINE ST

LOTIS

ST

PA

RK

AV

E

ORCHARD

AVE

HOPE ST

DOVER ST

NE

WS

T

SHERWO

OD CT

WAPLES AVE

KO

NSC

HAK

AVE

WO

ODFORD

DR

SH

AN

KR

DJ A

NE

KA

L A

WE

ST

VIE

WT

ER

R

TE

RR

TE

RR

SU

NS

ET

MO

NR

OE

WO

OD

SE

DG

E

RDWOODBURNCIR

WYOMING AVEBR

AD

FO

RD

ST

JEFFERSON

TERR

CH

ARLE

S DR

HOLLY DROAK DR YE

AR

SL

EY DR

CRESCENT DR

LYNNHAVENDR

RO

BER

TAA

V

CR

AWFO

RD

AVE

T

ST

ILL

AVE

NE

WC

AS

TLESUSSEX

COLLINSAXE

DR

RIV

ER

RD

STA

VE

BANK

KER

BIN

ST

ELM TERR

SC

DUPONT

STST

SH

OT

GU

N

ALL

EY

SOUTH ST

QU

EEN

ST

TE

R

A NC

E

INIM

A

T

ST

T

RODRIC

TERRACE

McB

RY

DR

McBRY CT

HUNTLEY CIR

RD

HARRINGTON TRUCK ROUTE (CON TINUED)

LOOCKERMAN STREET, QUEEN STREET TO STATE STREET, SAFETY

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include installation of a“signal ahead” sign; improved turning movements at Loockerman/Queen Streets;pedestrian signals; adding left turn arrows to pavement markings;installing handicapped curb cuts at Queen Street; and adding a signalon a mast arm.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To improve safety for multi-modalmovements throughout the area, which has a high accident rate.

County: KentMunicipality: DoverProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 32Senatorial District: 16, 17

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 42 40 0

100% ST 42 PE 4280% FHWA 200 C 200

All $ X 1,000

DIVISION ST

E. LOOCKERMAN ST

DR

BYRAE

KE

AVE

LIBERTYST

DUKE OF YORK

ST

S.EASTAV

THE PLAZA

NORTH

ST

BANK

LAAVE

WILLIAM

PENN

C.H.

POWEST

ST

SLAUGHTER

ST

ST

MINORREED

ST

TON

ST

GREENHILL

RD

PARK

DR

ST

AVE

COURT

CAPITOL

QUEEN

ST

DIVISION ST

E. LOOCKERMAN ST

DR

BYRAE

KE

AV

LIBERTYST

DUKE OF YORK

ST

S.EASTAV

THE PLAZA

NORTH

ST

BANK

LAAVE

WILLIAM

PENN

C.H.

POWEST

ST

SLAUGHTER

ST

ST

MINORREED

ST

TON

ST

GREENHILL

RD

PARK

DR

ST

AVE

COURT

CAPITOL

QUEEN

ST

SR 1 AND US 13 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS, KENT COUNTY

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The projects identified in Kent County to preserve the capacity of this transportation corridor. Some of these locations are include:

A. SR 1/US113A Little Heaven - Realign US113A north of Little Heaven to tie into a parallel roadway.

B. US 13 / Peach Basket Road (Felton) Intersection – Intersection improvements to improve traffic flow.

C. Thompsonville Overpass – Construct a new overpass.

D. Construction of auxiliary turning lanes throughout the SR 1 Corridor in Kent County

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To preserve the capacity in the SR 1 and US 13 Corridor.

County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 33Senatorial District: 16, 18

EST COSTTO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

INDIVIDUAL FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJECT IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJSEGMENTS TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 129 28 0 0

• SR 1/US113A 80% FHWA 60 PE 60C*

• US 13 / Peach Basket Road 100% ST 15 PE 1580% FHWA 138 C 13880% FHWA 35 PE 35

• Thompsonville Overpass 80% FHWA 500 PE 500

• Auxiliary Lane Upgrades 80% FHWA 75 PE 75

All $ X 1,000

SR 1 AND US 13 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS, KENT COUNTY (CONTINUED)

A. SR 1/US113A B. US 13 / Peach Basket Road (Felton)

C. Thompsonville Overpass

13

BA

SK

ET

RDN

RD

MAIN ST

TU

RK

EY

PO

INT

RDT

OM

AH

AW

KLN

EVENS RD

PLYMOUTH RD

PEACHBASKET RD

WA

LNU

TS

T

ANDREWS LAKE RD

DSTATE RD

INDIA

NPOIN

TRD

HA

SE

RD

CA

NTER

BU

RY

RD

S.D

UP

ON

TH

WY

PICKW

ICK

BLVD

COPPERFIELD LA

DICKENS LA

KIMBE

RLY

WAY

JENNIFERLA

SUMMON

ERS

TALE

LA

YOEMANSTALE

LA

GREENCT

KERRYCIR

WE

ST

SEWELLST

ST

W. SEWELL

WOODS EDGE LA

BR

AN

CH

ST

LO

VE

RS

LA

COURTNEY LA

COURTNEY LA

DEEP WOODS CT

ER

INAVE

RY

ANC

T

KBERRY RD

OO

DD

R

SUMACDR

DR

DAILEY

R.

MA

IN

TE

MP

L

ST

GU

ILD

E

ST

CH

APPALACHIAN DRVINEYARD LA

WIN

FR

ED

DR

OR

CH

ARD

AV

E

BERRY TO

PR

ATTS

BR

AN

KENT AVECAROLINE AVE

NE

WC

AS

TLE

AVE

MEMORIAL AVE

NF

OR

D ST

EAS

TS

T

NIL

EST

JEFFERSON STLUFFS ALLEY

GA

YST

E. R

. R.

AV

E

CORDRAYBUTTERWORTHST

HIGH ST

STST

W.

R.R

.A

VE

NORTH

GA

RE

YD

R

EL K

DR

ELK DR

GELDEN RD

GE

LD

EN

RD

13

BA

SK

ET

RDN

RD

MAIN ST

TU

RK

EY

PO

INT

RDT

OM

AH

AW

KLN

EVENS RD

PLYMOUTH RD

PEACHBASKET RD

WA

LNU

TS

T

ANDREWS LAKE RD

DSTATE RD

INDIA

NPOIN

TRD

HA

SE

RD

CA

NTER

BU

RY

RD

S.D

UP

ON

TH

WY

PICKW

ICK

BLVD

COPPERFIELD LA

DICKENS LA

KIMBE

RLY

WAY

JENNIFERLA

SUMMON

ERS

TALE

LA

YOEMANSTALE

LA

GREENCT

KERRYCIR

WE

ST

SEWELLST

ST

W. SEWELL

WOODS EDGE LA

BR

AN

CH

ST

LO

VE

RS

LA

COURTNEY LA

COURTNEY LA

DEEP WOODS CT

ER

INAVE

RY

ANC

T

KBERRY RD

OO

DD

R

SUMACDR

DR

DAILEY

R.

MA

IN

TE

MP

L

ST

GU

ILD

E

ST

CH

APPALACHIAN DRVINEYARD LA

WIN

FR

ED

DR

OR

CH

ARD

AV

E

BERRY TO

PR

ATTS

BR

AN

KENT AVECAROLINE AVE

NE

WC

AS

TLE

AVE

MEMORIAL AVE

NF

OR

D ST

EAS

TS

T

NIL

EST

JEFFERSON STLUFFS ALLEY

GA

YST

E. R

. R.

AV

E

CORDRAYBUTTERWORTHST

HIGH ST

STST

W.

R.R

.A

VE

NORTH

GA

RE

YD

R

EL K

DR

ELK DR

GELDEN RD

GE

LD

EN

RD

1

113

HILL

RD

BO

WM

AN

RD

OW

LN

TUBMILL POND

RD

TU

BM

ILL

PO

ND

RD

OLD CEMETARY RD

CIC

AD

AL

N

PARISKIRBY

RD

ITCHETT

RD

LOG CABIN RD

JEN

KIN

SR

D

BIG

STO

NE

BE

AC

HR

D

BIG

STO

NE

BE

AC

HERING RD

GREENH

OU

SER

TORBERT RD

THO

MPS

ON

VILL

ER

D

KELLER

AVE

1

113

HILL

RD

BO

WM

AN

RD

OW

LN

TUBMILL POND

RD

TU

BM

ILL

PO

ND

RD

OLD CEMETARY RD

CIC

AD

AL

N

PARISKIRBY

RD

ITCHETT

RD

LOG CABIN RD

JEN

KIN

SR

D

BIG

STO

NE

BE

AC

HR

D

BIG

STO

NE

BE

AC

HERING RD

GREENH

OU

SER

TORBERT RD

THO

MPS

ON

VILL

ER

D

KELLER

AVE

WALKER ROAD, KENTON ROAD TO SAULSBURY ROAD, SAFETY

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The proposed improvements consist of pavementrehabilitation; construction of shoulders and sidewalks on both sides of Walker Road; minorintersection improvements to accommodate bicycles; and minordrainage improvements. Some utility relocations will be necessary, aswell as limited acquisition of right of way and easements. The entireroadway will be overlaid with new pavement and re-striped.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Heavy residential development in thearea has led to an increase in traffic volumes and congestion along a0.8 mile long corridor.

County: KentMunicipality: DoverProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 31Senatorial District: 17

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004-2006

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/99-6/00 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/06PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 800 489 0

100% ST 271 PE 271100% ST 800 R/W 800

80% FHWA 2,446 C 2,446

All $ X 1,000

8

SAU

LSB

UR

YR

D

WALKER RD

FORREST AVE

KENTON RD

BU

RNIN

GTRE

ER

D.

HAZELTINE RD.

SHINNECOCK

ROAD

CA

RN

OU

STI

ER

D.

MA

PLE

DA

LEA

VE

.

ASHCT.

DR

IVE

AR

BOR

DR.

HA

RM

ON

YL

A.

NORTH

CA

RO

LINE

PL

.T

EA

LC

T.

CO

UR

TS

IDE

DR

.

BIC

EN

TE

NN

IAL

BLV

D.

DECLARAT ION

DR.

PA

TR

IOT

DR

.

FRE

ED

OM

PL.

FREEDOM

DR

.

LIBERTY DR.

COLONYDR.

ME

ETIN

GH

OU

SE

LA

.COBBLESTONELA.

CO

NTI

NENTA

LDR

.

OLD

FLINT

CIR.

DWIGHT

CT.WOODROW

CT.

ANDREWDR.

WASHINGTON

GEO.DR.

RU

TH

ER

FO

RD

CT

.

GREEN

BLADEDR.

LAMPLIGHTER

LA.

CO

LD

SP

RIN

GP

L.

ST

ON

EB

RO

OK

PL.

FIELDSTONE

PL.

PEW

TE

R

CT

.

MADISON CT.

PA

UL

RE

VE

RE

CT

.

CLARA ST E

PL

CARVER

IND

EP

EN

DA

NC

E

BL V

D

JEFFERSON CT

ADAMS CT

TO

N

T

GREENWAYLA

DR

HAMPTON

FOXHALL

DR

STONEY

DR

TALLOWICK

BRIARWOODLA

CT

CA

RN

OU

ST

IE

WINGED

FOOT CT

SC

IOT

OC

T

ECT

TURNBERRY

DR

CIR

KEN

TC

IR

GE

DR

HITCHINGPOST

DR

CO

BB

LE

RS

LA

HERITAGEDR

NA

VE AV

E

8

SAU

LSB

UR

YR

D

WALKER RD

FORREST AVE

KENTON RD

BU

RNIN

GTRE

ER

D.

HAZELTINE RD.

SHINNECOCK

ROAD

CA

RN

OU

STI

ER

D.

MA

PLE

DA

LEA

VE

.

ASHCT.

DR

IVE

AR

BOR

DR.

HA

RM

ON

YL

A.

NORTH

CA

RO

LINE

PL

.T

EA

LC

T.

CO

UR

TS

IDE

DR

.

BIC

EN

TE

NN

IAL

BLV

D.

DECLARAT ION

DR.

PA

TR

IOT

DR

.

FRE

ED

OM

PL.

FREEDOM

DR

.

LIBERTY DR.

COLONYDR.

ME

ETIN

GH

OU

SE

LA

.COBBLESTONELA.

CO

NTI

NENTA

LDR

.

OLD

FLINT

CIR.

DWIGHT

CT.WOODROW

CT.

ANDREWDR.

WASHINGTON

GEO.DR.

RU

TH

ER

FO

RD

CT

.

GREEN

BLADEDR.

LAMPLIGHTER

LA.

CO

LD

SP

RIN

GP

L.

ST

ON

EB

RO

OK

PL.

FIELDSTONE

PL.

PEW

TE

R

CT

.

MADISON CT.

PA

UL

RE

VE

RE

CT

.

CLARA ST E

PL

CARVER

IND

EP

EN

DA

NC

E

BL V

D

JEFFERSON CT

ADAMS CT

TO

N

T

GREENWAYLA

DR

HAMPTON

FOXHALL

DR

STONEY

DR

TALLOWICK

BRIARWOODLA

CT

CA

RN

OU

ST

IE

WINGED

FOOT CT

SC

IOT

OC

T

ECT

TURNBERRY

DR

CIR

KEN

TC

IR

GE

DR

HITCHINGPOST

DR

CO

BB

LE

RS

LA

HERITAGEDR

NA

VE AV

E

US113 / THOMPSONVILLE INTERCHANGE

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Construct a grade-separated interchange at thesignalized intersection of SR1 and Thompsonville Road (K19), along with a connectorto Church Hill Road (K404) and removal of median crossovers.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To enhance safety, improvetraffic flow in accordance with the SR1 Corridor CapacityPreservation Program and provide an alternate route to accesswest Milford.

County: KentMunicipality: DoverProgram Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 33Senatorial District: 16,18

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 200 3,375 1,820 0

80% FHWA 1,000 PE 1,000100% ST 3,200 R/W 3,375

80% AC FHWA 8,400 C 9,099

All $ X 1,000

1

113

HILL

RD

BO

WM

AN

RD

OW

LN

TUBMILL POND

RD

TU

BM

ILL

PO

ND

RD

OLD CEMETARY RD

CIC

AD

AL

N

PARISKIRBY

RD

ITCHETT

RD

LOG CABIN RD

JEN

KIN

SR

D

BIG

STO

NE

BE

AC

HR

D

BIG

STO

NE

BE

AC

HERING RD

GREENH

OU

SER

TORBERT RD

THO

MPS

ON

VILL

ER

D

KELLER

AVE

1

113

HILL

RD

BO

WM

AN

RD

OW

LN

TUBMILL POND

RD

TU

BM

ILL

PO

ND

RD

OLD CEMETARY RD

CIC

AD

AL

N

PARISKIRBY

RD

ITCHETT

RD

LOG CABIN RD

JEN

KIN

SR

D

BIG

STO

NE

BE

AC

HR

D

BIG

STO

NE

BE

AC

HERING RD

GREENH

OU

SER

TORBERT RD

THO

MPS

ON

VILL

ER

D

KELLER

AVE

BR237 ON S 46 OVER GRAVELLY BRANCH, SEAFORD

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will includereplacement of bridge with a corrugated metal arch with riprap at theentrance and exit.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andranked 104th on the bridge deficiency list.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 35,39Senatorial District: 19

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,062 248 0 0 0

21-076-01 100% ST 150 PE 150100% ST 44 R/W

80% FHWA 1,018 C

All $ X 1,000

DOVERD

KIN

GR

D

CO

NC

OR

H

ESK

RID

GE

RD

RD RD

PINEVIE

ST

ST

BEE

CH

LA

BURTON ST

MAINST

EX

PITTRD

WILKIN

SONDR

CHESTNUTLA

HA

RB

OR

SN

UG

DR

SURREY

DR

KENM

ORE

FAYMAURYAVE

ELM ST

CHARLES PINE

DOVERD

KIN

GR

D

CO

NC

OR

H

ESK

RID

GE

RD

RD RD

PINEVIE

ST

ST

BEE

CH

LA

BURTON ST

MAINST

EX

PITTRD

WILKIN

SONDR

CHESTNUTLA

HA

RB

OR

SN

UG

DR

SURREY

DR

KENM

ORE

FAYMAURYAVE

ELM ST

CHARLES PINE

BR350 ON S 72 OVER RACCOON POND, SPILLWAY, LAUREL

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace timber bridge and spillway with concretestructure on pile supported abutments with a steel sheet pile spillway andsluice gate. Place guardrail at approaches. Place riprap at spillway andunder the bridge.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andfunctionally obsolete. It is ranked 65th on the deficiency list.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 40Senatorial District: 21

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 890 191 0 0 0

100% ST 126 PE 126100% ST 16 R/W

80% FHWA 874 C

All $ X 1,000

24

GOOSE NEST RD

WH

ALE

YS

RD

TR

AP

LITTLE HILL RD

SA

MU

EL

HI

R POND RD

HU

DS

ON

RD

OODY RD

LEH

ILLR

D

HUDSON DR

X

24

GOOSE NEST RD

WH

ALE

YS

RD

TR

AP

LITTLE HILL RD

SA

MU

EL

HI

R POND RD

HU

DS

ON

RD

OODY RD

LEH

ILLR

D

HUDSON DR

X

BR365N AND 365S ON NORTH AND SOUTH US 13, RECORDS POND, EASTOF LAUREL

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitate existingstructures including pile jackets, concrete deck overlay, jointreplacement, and upgrade existing bridge rail and guardrail. Onelane of traffic on each bridge will be maintained duringreconstruction.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridges are functionallyobsolete and are ranked 89th and 91st, respectively, on thedeficiency list.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 222 0 0 0

100% ST 166 PE 16680% FHWA 1,108 C 1,108

All $ X 1,000

24

CHIPMANS POND RD

CH

IPM

AN

SCHASE

DR

CREEKRD

MARYLAND

C

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

HEARN AVEHORSEY AVEALLEN

AVE

AVE

AVEA

VE

BO

YC

E

LAUREL

ELL

ISP

RE

TT

YMA

N

PU

RN

ELL

DR

WH

ITE

LAKE

DRW

AT

ER

VIE

WAVEAV

E

GO

VE

RNO

RS

LAN

SIN

G

KIN

G

ST

STCOOPER

FRONT

WILLO

W

ST

PIN

ES

T

LEWIS

DR

LACHIPMANS

BROAD

LAKESIDEDR

SH

OR

TA

VE

WILS

ON

SU

SSE

XA

VE

BRO

OK

LYN

AVE

DELAW

ARE

AVEWASHINGTON

GEORGETOWN

RO

DANIELS

AL

AVE

ST

SIXTH

TON

IGHTH

DE

SH

I ELD T

FOURTH STFIFTH ST

SYC

AMO

RELA

WALNUT

WILSONST

CU

L VER

DR

ST

CHIPMAN

SP

RU

CE

STVE

24

CHIPMANS POND RD

CH

IPM

AN

S

CHASE

DR

CREEKRD

MARYLAND

C

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

HEARN AVEHORSEY AVEALLEN

AVE

AVE

AVEA

VE

BO

YC

E

LAUREL

ELL

ISP

RE

TT

YMA

N

PU

RN

ELL

DR

WH

ITE

LAKE

DRW

AT

ER

VIE

WAVEAV

E

GO

VE

RNO

RS

LAN

SIN

G

KIN

G

ST

STCOOPER

FRONT

WILLO

W

ST

PIN

ES

T

LEWIS

DR

LACHIPMANS

BROAD

LAKESIDEDR

SH

OR

TA

VE

WILS

ON

SU

SSE

XA

VE

BRO

OK

LYN

AVE

DELAW

ARE

AVEWASHINGTON

GEORGETOWN

RO

DANIELS

AL

AVE

ST

SIXTH

TON

IGHTH

DE

SH

I ELD T

FOURTH STFIFTH ST

SYC

AMO

RELA

WALNUT

WILSONST

CU

L VER

DR

ST

CHIPMAN

SP

RU

CE

STVE

BR447 ON SR 54 OVER BLACK WATER DITCH, EAST OF DAGSBORO

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace existing rigidframe.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 45th on the bridge deficiency list.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 38Senatorial District: 20

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 80

21-073-01 100% ST 60 PE 60100% ST 10 R/W 10

80% FHWA 400 C 400

All $ X 1,000

26

BALLASWO

OD

AC

RE

SR

D

GR

AY

RD

REEK RD

WEST

RD OMAR RD BLA

CK

W

BR

EA

SU

RE

RD

HIC

KO

RY

MA

NO

RR

D

VINES CREEK RDP

OW

WH

ISP

ER

ING

CEDAR CT

ST

EV

EN

DR

LA

HID

DE

N

ACRE DR

TR

AN

QU

IL ITY

LAN

E

HIDE A WAYCT

SHAWNEEIND

CREE

TOMAHAW

APACHE PASS

CHIPPIAWA

DR

SQUAW LA

SHAWNEE DRHAWATHA BLVD

MO

HI C

AN

DR

HA

WA

T HA

BLV

DPONYDR

TIMB

ER

ED

GE

DR

SYLVAN VUE DR

LEONA

WINGATE CT

NO

RM

ALE

EC

T

ELA

G

26

BALLASWO

OD

AC

RE

SR

D

GR

AY

RD

REEK RD

WEST

RD OMAR RD BLA

CK

W

BR

EA

SU

RE

RD

HIC

KO

RY

MA

NO

RR

D

VINES CREEK RDP

OW

WH

ISP

ER

ING

CEDAR CT

ST

EV

EN

DR

LA

HID

DE

N

ACRE DR

TR

AN

QU

IL ITY

LAN

E

HIDE A WAYCT

SHAWNEEIND

CREE

TOMAHAW

APACHE PASS

CHIPPIAWA

DR

SQUAW LA

SHAWNEE DRHAWATHA BLVD

MO

HI C

AN

DR

HA

WA

T HA

BLV

DPONYDR

TIMB

ER

ED

GE

DR

SYLVAN VUE DR

LEONA

WINGATE CT

NO

RM

ALE

EC

T

ELA

G

BR526 AND 527 ON BETTS POND, MILLSBORO

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace BR527 with concrete frame structureand sheet pile spillway. Replace BR526 with concrete box. Place timber guardrail atbridge approaches. Stabilize slopes.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Bridges have low structural capacityand narrow width. BR526 is ranked 67th and BR527 is ranked 11th onthe bridge deficiency list. Both bridges are functionally obsolete.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 41Senatorial District: 20

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 572 0 0 0

99-073-01 100% ST 1,200 C 1,200

All $ X 1,000

IR

ARD

BE

TTS

PO

ND

RD

JERSEY RD

HO

LLY

THOMPSONVILLE RDBARK POND RD

OL RD HOUST

OA

KA

VE

LAK

ES

IDE

LA

KE

RLY

NDR

PINE LODGEADDITION

CARLISLE

CUBALO ST

RIVER DRAT

KIN

SS

TJONES ALLEYMOORE AL

STATE ST

MCHSU

SS

EX

LLE

Y

ELL

ISST

PO

ND

ALL

EY

OD

WIN

STPINE STMONR

IR

ARD

BE

TTS

PO

ND

RD

JERSEY RD

HO

LLY

THOMPSONVILLE RDBARK POND RD

OL RD HOUST

OA

KA

VE

LAK

ES

IDE

LA

KE

RLY

N

DR

PINE LODGEADDITION

CARLISLE

CUBALO ST

RIVER DRAT

KIN

SS

TJONES ALLEYMOORE AL

STATE ST

MCHSU

SS

EX

LLE

Y

ELL

ISST

PO

ND

ALL

EY

OD

WIN

STPINE STMONR

BR586 ON MILLSBORO HIGHWAY (S 26) OVER POCOMOKE RIVER,NORTH OF GUMBORO

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements focus on replacement of the existingrigid frame with a precast rigid frame, with riprap placed to protect thefoundation.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andranks 124th on the bridge deficiency list.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 41Senatorial District: 21

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 344 0 0 0

20-073-05 100% ST 5 R/W 5100% ST 344 C 344

All $ X 1,000

30

LYN

CH

RD

LOWES CROSSING RD

FOX

HOUN

DLAN

E

PE

AR

TR

EE

RD

BRADFORD RD

JO

CA

YU

GA

DR

30

LYN

CH

RD

LOWES CROSSING RD

FOX

HOUN

DLAN

E

PE

AR

TR

EE

RD

BRADFORD RD

JO

CA

YU

GA

DR

BR815N ON SR 1 NB OVER WAPLES POND

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace concrete slab bridge with prestressedconcrete adjacent box beam bridge; make safety improvements at approaches; and placerip-rap to prevent scour at the foundation.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 81st on the deficiency list.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 36Senatorial District: 18

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 215 0 0 0

21-071-03 100% ST 150 PE 150100% ST 10 R/W 10

80% FHWA 1,026 C 1,026

All $ X 1,000

1

CEDARC

REEK

CRES RDLITTLE

NECKRD

TRUITT RD

CLIFTON RD

DEEP BRANCH RD

Y

ITH

CT

PINE DRMOUNTAIN LAUREL DRSYLVAN DRRED CEDAR DR

WHITE CEDAR DR

OA

KLA

1

CEDARC

REEK

CRES RDLITTLE

NECKRD

TRUITT RD

CLIFTON RD

DEEP BRANCH RD

Y

ITH

CT

PINE DRMOUNTAIN LAUREL DRSYLVAN DRRED CEDAR DR

WHITE CEDAR DR

OA

KLA

US113, MD STATE LINE NORTH OF DAGSBORO

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project was split into three separate phases. The first, US 113, North of Millsboro to S321 is --currently under construction. The second, from North of Dagsboro to North of Millsboro was recently awarded. The remaining section fromUS113, North of Dagsboro to North of Millsboro – will include resurface the existing pavement; make intersection and drainage improvements atSR 24; and incorporate various minor safety improvements.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Roadway over the entire distance needs to be replaced due to deteriorating pavement.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 38, 41Senatorial District: 20, 21

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 5,374 0 0 0

97-109-02 80% FHWA 15,615 C 15,614

All $ X 1,000

US113, MD STATE LINE NORTH OF DAGSBORO (CONTINUED)

17

113

JAYPATCH RD

POLLY BRANCH RD

BISHOPVILLE R

LYNCH RD

HU

DS

ON

RD

HU

DS

ON

RD

BIXLER RD

LIGHTHO

GUM RD

RAB

RD

PE

PP

ER

CYPRESS RD

PHILLIPS RD

BAKER RD

HOOSIER ST EXT

MCCABE RD

CLIFF RD

PARKE

ROXANA RDSC

HO

OL

ST

SMITH AVEFIELDAVE

CLENDANIEL AVECEMETARY RD

WE

ST

RR

AV

EE

AS

TR

RA

VE

LON

GA

VE HOLLO

WAY ST

DUNES ST EXT

E. TANGLEWOOD DR

W. TANGLEWOOD DR

GUMBORORDHOSIE

RSTREET

DUKESSTREET

CHURCHSTREET

E.RR

AV

E

BAKER

PAR

KE

RDA

VIS

ALLE

YA

VE

ELLISALLEY

MCCABEST

RUTH ST

HELLEN ST

GEORGA ST

BEN

NE

TT

ST

RO

DG

ER

SW

ILLIAM

SS

TSECONDFIR

ST

WA

LNU

TST

HA

LL

CHU

RCH

LAHA

ND

YLA

DE

RR

ICK

SON

LA

FENWICK ROAD

C.H.

17

113

JAYPATCH RD

POLLY BRANCH RD

BISHOPVILLE R

LYNCH RD

HU

DS

ON

RD

HU

DS

ON

RD

BIXLER RD

LIGHTHO

GUM RD

RAB

RD

PE

PP

ER

CYPRESS RD

PHILLIPS RD

BAKER RD

HOOSIER ST EXT

MCCABE RD

CLIFF RD

PARKE

ROXANA RDSC

HO

OL

ST

SMITH AVEFIELDAVE

CLENDANIEL AVECEMETARY RD

WE

ST

RR

AV

EE

AS

TR

RA

VE

LON

GA

VE HOLLO

WAY ST

DUNES ST EXT

E. TANGLEWOOD DR

W. TANGLEWOOD DR

GUMBORORDHOSIE

RSTREET

DUKESSTREET

CHURCHSTREET

E.RR

AV

E

BAKER

PAR

KE

RDA

VIS

ALLE

YA

VE

ELLISALLEY

MCCABEST

RUTH ST

HELLEN ST

GEORGA ST

BEN

NE

TT

ST

RO

DG

ER

SW

ILLIAM

SS

TSECONDFIR

ST

WA

LNU

TST

HA

LL

CHU

RCH

LAHA

ND

YLA

DE

RR

ICK

SON

LA

FENWICK ROAD

C.H.

26

20

113

26

STUM

TOW

NS

EN

DS

RD

OMAR RD

HONOLULURD

MU

RR

AY

RD

DU

KES

RD

VINES CREEK RD

CLAYTON ST

NINE FOOT RD

GU DRE

AV

E

PYLE CENT

ARMORY RD

CL

AY

TO

NA

VE

MA

INS

TTREE RD

GUM TREE RD

SWAM

PRD

IELD RD

QU

AIL

RU

NR

D

BLUEBERRY LANE

BA

KE

RS

RD

BERRY RD

MO

OR

ES

T

POMME LAPECHE ST

WILL

IAMS

ST

HICKORY ST

DAISEY AVEMAINST

RE

ED

STTH

ATCH

ERST

WALNUTMILL STDOVER

ANKFORD

AVE

ST

DUMP

DE

LAW

AR

E ST

KNOXST

GR

EE

N

R.R

.ST

CAREYST

GU

MS

TAPPLE

STST

RR

ST

CEEBEE

SHOCKLEY

FLO

OD

ST

GUMS

AVE

SW

AM

PROAD

R.R

. AV

ELINGO

RDCAN

AL

STHAZZARDST

HE

LMST

CE

GE

OR

GE

SA

VE

OMAR ST

WARRINGTOST

CHURCHPINEST

ST

WS

TLES

ST

SU

SSEXST

26

20

113

26

STUM

TOW

NS

EN

DS

RD

OMAR RD

HONOLULURD

MU

RR

AY

RD

DU

KES

RD

VINES CREEK RD

CLAYTON ST

NINE FOOT RD

GU DRE

AV

E

PYLE CENT

ARMORY RD

CL

AY

TO

NA

VE

MA

INS

T

TREE RD

GUM TREE RD

SWAM

PRD

IELD RD

QU

AIL

RU

NR

D

BLUEBERRY LANE

BA

KE

RS

RD

BERRY RD

MO

OR

ES

T

POMME LAPECHE ST

WILL

IAMS

ST

HICKORY ST

DAISEY AVEMAINST

RE

ED

STTH

ATCH

ERST

WALNUTMILL STDOVER

ANKFORD

AVE

ST

DUMP

DE

LAW

AR

E ST

KNOXST

GR

EE

N

R.R

.ST

CAREYST

GU

MS

TAPPLE

STST

RR

ST

CEEBEE

SHOCKLEY

FLO

OD

ST

GUMS

AVE

SW

AM

PROAD

R.R

. AV

ELINGO

RDCAN

AL

STHAZZARDST

HE

LMST

CE

GE

OR

GE

SA

VE

OMAR ST

WARRINGTOST

CHURCHPINEST

ST

WS

TLES

ST

SU

SSEXST

MILTON TRUCK BYPASS, FROM SR 5 TO SR 30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To implement a truck bypass route around Milton, the following improvements are sought:

1. Intersection improvements at SR 5/S319 – This intersection is difficult for trucks to navigate. In addition, the road at this intersection “dips”. (Supported by the 1995Milton Truck Study).

2. S319 – This roadbed is inadequate for truck traffic and needs to be reconstructed with 8-foot shoulders to handle truck and vehicular traffic. (Supported by the 1995Milton Truck Study).

3. BR806 – This bridge is structurally sound, but functionally obsolete. This bridge will be widened without having to be replaced. (Supported by the 1995 Milton TruckStudy).

4. Intersection improvements at SR 30/S319 - This stop sign intersection is difficult for trucks to maneuver through. Left and right turning lanes are needed. (Supportedby the 1995 Milton Truck Study).

5. Replacement of BR918 – This bridge is narrow and has a very low elevation. A curve just north of the bridge has raised safety concerns, as it is used by Haz-Mat trucksthat cross over this millpond. (Supported by the 1995 Milton Truck Study).

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: For over 20 years the Town of Milton has been complaining about the truck traffic using SR 5 detracting from local quality of life. Theconstant rumbling of trucks using SR 5 causes deterioration to houses adjacent to SR 5, some of which are historically significant. In addition, truck traffic conflicts withpedestrian safety and maintenance of town utilities located under the SR 5 roadbed.

Area truckers, despite the Town’s opposition, continue to use SR 5 through the heart of town to access SR 1 Northbound. Truckers complained that the existing roads andlinkages outside town were inadequate to meet their needs for safe and efficient truck travel. In the fall of 1998, DelDOT’s Bureau of Traffic posted Alternative Truck Routesigns that directed trucks to the designated route around town. However, because the voluntary route does not meet truck traffic standards, use of this route cannot be enforced.Therefore, until the bypass improvements are completed, the truck traffic problem in town will continue.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

MILTON TRUCK BYPASS, FROM SR 5 TO SR 30 (CONTINUED)

BR806 on S319 AND BR918 on SR 30 S319, Reconstruction, S319 & SR 5, S319 & SR 30

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 282 10 390 0

100% ST 37 LOC/ENV 37100% ST 245 PE 245100% ST 10 R/W 10

80% FHWA 1,950 C 1,950

All $ X 1,000

S298 AND 299, REHABILITATION AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project consists of three phases of safety androadway improvements including:

• S298, from SR 24 to S 22: Place a 3’ pavement overlay 22’ wide; install closed drainage;curb the intersection at S 22; and create a turn lane to S 22 westbound and signalizeintersection. Ditching will also be addressed as needed.

• S298 at SR 24: Realignment as well as with lighting and safetyimprovements.

• S298 from S 22 to S299: 3’ pavement overlay for 22’ wide travel lanesand 4’ shoulders; curbs and gutters; sidewalks; and a closed drainagesystem. Other lighting and safety improvements will also be made.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Improve safety throughout the area.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 37, 38Senatorial District: 20

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 50 150 100 280

100% ST 50 LOC/ENV 50100% ST 150 PE 150100% ST 100 R/W 100

80% FHWA 1,400 C 1,400

All $ X 1,000

OAKOR

BANKSRD

GREENRD

SCHOO

LLA

EGION

RDIN

ITY

RD

AU

TU

MN

RD

BAYFARM

LONG NECK RD

DR

AN

GOWATER

RD

RY RD

ST

EV

EN

SO

N

PHILLIP OLLY LAKE RDHILL RD

FRIENDSHIP RD

CA

NN

ON

RD

MOUNT JOYRD

CAMP RD

ST

R

DR

AN

ER

D R

23

23

5

24

308

299

299

299A

298

298298

22

22

22

22C

298

24

24

298A

298

22

303303

303A

307

306A

297

307

308

302

297

304

306

301

279

G I S -T

D e la wa r e D O T

N

OAKOR

BANKSRD

GREENRD

SCHOO

LLA

EGION

RDIN

ITY

RD

AU

TU

MN

RD

BAYFARM

LONG NECK RD

DR

AN

GOWATER

RD

RY RD

ST

EV

EN

SO

N

PHILLIP OLLY LAKE RDHILL RD

FRIENDSHIP RD

CA

NN

ON

RD

MOUNT JOYRD

CAMP RD

ST

R

DR

AN

ER

D R

23

23

5

24

308

299

299

299A

298

298298

22

22

22

22C

298

24

24

298A

298

22

303303

303A

307

306A

297

307

308

302

297

304

306

301

279

G I S -T

D e la wa r e D O T

N

SR 1, DEWEY BEACH TO LEWES AND REHOBOTH CANAL,IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Construction of sidewalkson both sides of SR 1; median modifications; pavement anddrainage improvements; and intersection improvements, includingthe installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of DoddAvenue and SR 1. The project limits are from Salisbury Road to theLewes and Rehoboth Canal. Pavement rehabilitation along thelength of the roadway will also be undertaken.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To improve pedestrian safety andmake needed roadway improvements.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 37Senatorial District: 20

EST COSTINDIVIIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 985 1,040 0 0

Dewey Beach to Lewes and 100% ST 275 PE 275Rehoboth Canal 100% ST 985 R/W 985

80% FHWA 3,950 C 3,950

SR 1, Dewey Beach (Forgotten Mile), 80% FHWA 1,250 C 1,250Pavement Rehabilitation

All $ X 1,000

HEB

RO

NR

D

CO

UNT

RYCL

UB

RD

STAT

ER

D

BA

YV

IST

AR

D

BA

YR

D

1

1A1B

1AREHOBOTH

DEWEY BEACH

KENS INGTON

YARMOUTH

DARTMOUTH

PLYMOUTH

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

BLACKPOOL

BRADFORDBRIGHTON

BAMB URY

WA

Y

WAY

CO

NW

ALL

OX

FORD

EAST

SIDE

DR

LOO

P

LANDS

END

LO NDONCIRCIR

SHE

FF I

ELD

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

SHEFF

IELD

WAY

SO

ME

RSE

TST

AFF

ORD

SUF

FOL

KSU

RR

EY

BUCKINGHAMDR

E. LAKE

DR

AVE

AV E

AVE

AVE

AVE

AVE

DELAWAREWILMINGTONREHOBO TH

BA LTIMORE

OLIVE

VIRGINIA

COLU

MBI

A

T

GERAR ST

PARKAVE

COOKMANST

KENT ST KENTST

SUSSEX STSUSSEX

ST

AVE EXTREHOBOTHLA

KEAVE

CITYHALLD

R

MARYLAND3RD

ST

GERAR ST

EASTONST

FELTONST

HENL

GROVEST

CA

NA

LS

T6T

HS

TC

OUNTR

YCLU

BDR

HICKMAN

STOCKLEY

CO

UN

TRY

CL

UB

DR

SC

AR

BO

RO

UG

HA

V E

BA

YA

RD

AV

E

1ST

ST

PINE

TID S

T

BA

YH

AR

BOR

DR

NAUTILUS

CT

BAY

HAR

BO

RD

R

CANAL DR

BRIGANTINECT

SPIN

NAKER

CT

BU

RTO

NC

T

OCEAN VIEWAVE

PARK VIEWAVE

KY VIEW

AVE

AWARE

EAAIR

CENTER

ATLANTIC

AVE

AVE

AVE

ACE LAT

T

R

15

50

READ ST

MCKINLEY ST

BU

EN

DO

V

HAY

CHESAPEAKE ST

CAROLINA

JERSE YCULLE N

CHICAGO

WEST

ST LOUIS ST

HOUSTON

CLAYTON

SWEDES

SAULSBURY

NEW ORLEANS

BE LLEVUE

DAGSWORTHY

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ANDREWST

ELIZAB

ETH

DODD

CARLA

BAYVIEW

DUTCH

SWEDES

1ST2N

D

AVE

AVE

AVE

AV E

ST

RD

VENE

TIA

ND

R

SAULSBURYST

TERRACE

RD

ROBINSON DR

ANNIE

BW

ILLIA

MF

SMITHAVE

JAM

ESA

PINE LA

JOS

EPHIN

E

FBE

NSO

N

GEORGE

STST

STST

STST

MARTIN

GUTHRIE

QUILLENDAISEYBAY

PINEM

APL

E

CANAL RD

WASHIN

GTONST

LINC

OLN

STOCKLEY ST EXT

NEWCASTLE ST

EXT

SCHOOL LALE

EST

OLDBAY

RD

SCARBOROUGHST EXT

1ST STBASIN RD3RD ST

4TH ST5TH ST

6TH ST7TH ST

8TH ST9TH ST

10TH ST11TH ST

BALD

EA

GLE

RD

KEN

SIN

GTO

NR

DC

OR

NW

AL L

RD

LEEDS WAY

BAY

VIE

WR

D

CR

AZ

YL

A

KING

SBR

IDG

ER

D

BUCKINGHAM

DR

CO

RN

WALL

RD

CR

OYD

ON

RD

CAR

DIFF

RD

CANTE

RBE

RRY

LA

BRANCHWOOD DR

WEST SIDEDR

WHITE

OAK D

HARMON LA

EAG

LED

R

MARTIN ST

PHIL

LIP

SS

T

PHILLIPS ST

WASHINGTON

ST

MALLOY ST

CENTRAL AVE

HARMON ST

BURTON AVE

DUFFY

STN

ORW

OO

DST

DE DR

PENN STPROS PECT STQUEE N STLAKE

DR

ST LAWRENCE STRODNEYST

ST

ST

ST

STST

ST

ST

ST

ST

NORFOLKSTOCKLEY

NEW CASTLEHICKMAN

LA UREL

LAUREL

MUNSON STPHILADELPHIA

PHILADELPHIABROOKLYN AVEAV E

G I S -T

D e la wa r e D O T

N

HEB

RO

NR

D

CO

UNT

RYCL

UB

RD

STAT

ER

D

BA

YV

IST

AR

D

BA

YR

D

1

1A1B

1AREHOBOTH

DEWEY BEACH

KENS INGTON

YARMOUTH

DARTMOUTH

PLYMOUTH

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

BLACKPOOL

BRADFORDBRIGHTON

BAMB URY

WA

Y

WAY

CO

NW

ALL

OX

FORD

EAST

SIDE

DR

LOO

P

LANDS

END

LO NDONCIRCIR

SHE

FF I

ELD

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

SHEFF

IELD

WAY

SO

ME

RSE

TST

AFF

ORD

SUF

F OL

KSU

RR

EY

BUCKINGHAMDR

E. LAKE

DR

AVE

AV E

AVE

AVE

AVE

AVE

DELAWAREWILMINGTONREHOBO TH

BA LTIMORE

OLIVE

VIRGINIA

COLU

MBI

A

T

GERAR ST

PARKAVE

COOKMANST

KENT ST KENTST

SUSSEX STSUSSEX

ST

AVE EXTREHOBOTH

LAKE

AVE

CITYHALLD

R

MARYLAND3RD

ST

GERAR ST

EASTONST

FELTONST

HENL

GROVEST

CA

NA

LS

T6T

HS

TC

OUNTR

YCLU

BDR

HICKMAN

STOCKLEY

CO

UN

TRY

CL

UB

DR

SC

AR

BO

RO

UG

HA

V E

BA

YA

RD

AV

E

1ST

ST

PINE

TID S

T

BA

YH

AR

BOR

DR

NAUTILUS

CT

BAY

HAR

BO

RD

R

CANAL DR

BRIGANTINECT

SPIN

NAKER

CT

BU

RTO

NC

T

OCEAN VIEWAVE

PARK VIEWAVE

KY VIEW

AVE

AWARE

EAAIR

CENTER

ATLANTIC

AVE

AVE

AVE

ACE LAT

T

R

15

50

READ ST

MCKINLEY ST

BU

EN

DO

V

HAY

CHESAPEAKE ST

CAROLINA

JERSE YCULLE N

CHICAGO

WEST

ST LOUIS ST

HOUSTON

CLAYTON

SWEDES

SAULSBURY

NEW ORLEANS

BE LLEVUE

DAGSWORTHY

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ANDREWST

ELIZAB

ETH

DODD

CARLA

BAYVIEW

DUTCH

SWEDES

1ST2N

D

AVE

AVE

AVE

AV E

ST

RD

VENE

TIA

ND

R

SAULSBURYST

TERRACE

RD

ROBINSON DR

ANNIE

BW

ILLIA

MF

SMITHAVE

JAM

ESA

PINE LA

JOS

EPHIN

E

FBE

NSO

N

GEORGE

STST

STST

STST

MARTIN

GUTHRIE

QUILLENDAISEYBAY

PINEM

APL

E

CANAL RD

WASHIN

GTONST

LINC

OLN

STOCKLEY ST EXT

NEWCASTLE ST

EXT

SCHOOL LALE

EST

OLDBAY

RD

SCARBOROUGHST EXT

1ST STBASIN RD3RD ST

4TH ST5TH ST

6TH ST7TH ST

8TH ST9TH ST

10TH ST11TH ST

BALD

EA

GLE

RD

KEN

SIN

GTO

NR

DC

OR

NW

AL L

RD

LEEDS WAY

BAY

VIE

WR

D

CR

AZ

YL

A

KING

SB R

IDG

ER

D

BUCKINGHAM

DR

CO

RN

WALL

RD

CR

OYD

ON

RD

CAR

DIFF

RD

CANTE

RBE

RRY

LA

BRANCHWOOD DR

WEST SIDEDR

WHITE

OAK D

HARMON LA

EAG

LED

R

MARTIN ST

PHIL

LIP

SS

T

PHILLIPS ST

WASHINGTON

ST

MALLOY ST

CENTRAL AVE

HARMON ST

BURTON AVE

DUFFY

STN

ORW

OO

DST

DE DR

PENN STPROS PECT STQUEE N STLAKE

DR

ST LAWRENCE STRODNEYST

ST

ST

ST

STST

ST

ST

ST

ST

NORFOLKSTOCKLEY

NEW CASTLEHICKMAN

LA UREL

LAUREL

MUNSON STPHILADELPHIA

PHILADELPHIABROOKLYN AVEAV E

G I S -T

D e la wa r e D O T

N

SR 1, GRID IMPROVEMENTS, REHOBOTH AVENUE TO FIVE POINTS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The proposed projects listed below are the result ofPhase I of the SR 1 Grid Study. Further development of proposed solutions and alternates aswell as public involvement will be needed before these projects canmove forward to design.

1. Nassau Ped/Bike Connection: This project provides a newrelocated section for a portion of the AmericanDiscovery/Millennium Trail, making use of the existing gradeseparation between SR 1 and the DelDOT-owned railroad tracks atNassau. It would provide a ped/bike crossing of SR 1 away from theFive Points intersection. Future expansion to the east and westwould need to be done by others as part of other projects.

2. Rehoboth Entrance Improvements: This project improves operations and safety at the SR1/1A split by providing a new access route connection to Rehoboth Avenue. It would use theexisting SR 1 grade separation north of the Lewes and Rehoboth Canal and follow analignment along the presently undeveloped Canal Landing area. This project requires acquisition of right-of-way from Canal Landing and the Corps of Engineers. Itincludes elements that were requested by the community, such as satisfying the request of the West Rehoboth community concerning Hebron Road, and providing anoption that would allow for the relocation of buses from State Road south of the Canal. It also would provide access to the Canal area by motorists, bicyclists, andpedestrians and connect with DNREC’s Lewes to Rehoboth multi-use trail north of Hebron Road.

SR 1/Rehoboth Avenue Intersection Improvement: This project would increase the capacity at the intersection of SR 1 and Rehoboth Avenue; expedite the flow oftraffic leaving the beach; and allow more flexibility in controlling traffic signal operations. It includes the addition of a third northbound lane on SR1 approachingRehoboth Avenue and a second westbound lane on Rehoboth Avenue approaching SR 1.

3. Nassau Park-and-Ride Lot: This project is a 600 to 700 vehicle park-and-ride facility that would be located north of Five Points to intercept traffic from the northdestined for Rehoboth Beach and Lewes/Cape Henlopen. The park-and-ride lot would have shared use potential and be coordinated with the SR265 grade separation beingplanned as part of the SR 1 Corridor Preservation Program north of Nassau. As part of the operation of the park-and-ride lot, it is anticipated there would be shuttle busservices into the resort areas and that the lot could be the site for bus transfers.

4. Ped/Bike Connection: Old Landing Road to Rehoboth: This project provides a Bike Route 1 connection from Old Landing Road/Airport Road vicinity south to theentrance to Rehoboth on the west side of SR1. It involves the construction of a high-grade bike/ped facility that connects local communities and satisfies citizen interests.Some sections involve shoulder improvements based on typical sections developed for this project (e.g. Old Landing Road, Airport Road, Phillips Street, and MartinStreet). Other sections would be on new right-of-way. The alignment of the ped/bike facility would also connect to the existing Rehoboth park-and-ride lot and DelDOT’sproposed SR1 ped/bike intersection improvements at Church Street and Bald Eagle Road.

NRD

MUNCY BRANCH RD

WOLF NECK RD

HO

LLAN

DG

LAD

ERD

HEB

RO

NR

D

UN

TRY

CLU

BR

D

OLD

LA

ND

ING

R

STA

TER

D

BA

YV

IST

AR

D

BA

YR

GIL

L

CLAY RD

HARDRDD

KIN

GS

HIG

HW

AY

BELLTOW

NRD

WARRINGTON RD

POSTAL LA

CEDARGRO

VERD

WAR

DR

D

MULBERRYKNOLL RD

RO

BIN

SVI

LLE

RD

EBBSLANDIN

GRD

TS RD JOH

NJ.

WIL

LIA

MS

HW

Y

RG RD

1

1A

1A

1B

9

23

24

REHOBOTH

HENLOPEN ACRES

1

1A1B

9

24

23

1A

NRD

MUNCY BRANCH RD

WOLF NECK RD

HO

LLAN

DG

LAD

ERD

HEB

RO

NR

D

UN

TRY

CLU

BR

D

OLD

LA

ND

ING

R

STA

TER

D

BA

YV

IST

AR

D

BA

YR

GIL

L

CLAY RD

HARDRDD

KIN

GS

HIG

HW

AY

BELLTOW

NRD

WARRINGTON RD

POSTAL LA

CEDARGRO

VERD

WAR

DR

D

MULBERRYKNOLL RD

RO

BIN

SVI

LLE

RD

EBBSLANDIN

GRD

TS RD JOH

NJ.

WIL

LIA

MS

HW

Y

RG RD

1

1A

1A

1B

9

23

24

REHOBOTH

HENLOPEN ACRES

1

1A1B

9

24

23

1A

SR 1, GRID IMPROVEMENTS, REHOBOTH AVENUE TO FIVE POINTS (CONTINUED)

5. Lewes to Rehoboth Bike Path: Construction of a bikeway linking the cities of Lewes and Rehoboth Beach independent of existing roads. This will be a 12’ wideapproximately 4.8 mile concrete bike path, generally following the abandoned rail corridor of the old Lewes and Rehoboth Rail Line.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 37Senatorial District: 20

EST COSTINDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 420 2,610 5,350

1. Nassau Bike/Ped. Connection 100% ST 60 LOC/ENV 30 30100% ST 90 PE 90100% ST 100 R/W 100

80% FHWA 1,000 C 1,000

2. Rehoboth Entrance Imp’s 100% ST 120 LOC/ENV 40 80SR 1 / Rehoboth Ave Int imp 100% ST 500 PE 200 300

100% ST 2,400 R/W 1,000 1,40080% FHWA 5,600 C 5,600

3. Nassau Park and Ride Lot 100% ST 30 LOC/ENV 30100% ST 110 PE 110100% ST 2,400 R/W 2,400

80% FHWA 3,000 C 3,000

4. Bike/Ped Connection 100% ST 20 LOC/ENV 20Old Landing Road to Rehoboth P&R 100% ST 100 PE 100

100% ST 950 R/W 95080% FHWA 1,400 C 1,400

5. Lewes to Rehoboth Bike Path 100% ST 500 C 500

SR 24 AND SR 5, LONG NECK ROAD, NORTHEAST OF MILLSBORO, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, SAFETY

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Widen each approach toprovide separate left, through, and right turning lanes. This projectwill include bike lanes for SR 24.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Improved safety for the travellingpublic. This project has been a high priority at Sussex County CIPhearings.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 37, 38Senatorial District: 20

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 331 0 0 0

91-003-01 100% ST 137 PE 137100% ST 168 R/W 168

80% FHWA 1,466 C 1,466

All $ X 1,000

O

BANKSRD

GREENRD

SCHOO

LLA

NRDRD

AU

TU

MN

RD

BAY

LONG NECK RD

AN

GATERRD

ERY RD

ST

EV

EN

SPHIL RDS HILL RD

FRIENDSHIP RD

CA

NN

ON

RD

MOUNTJOY

R

DCAMP RD

DR

AN

E

23

23

5

24

299

299

298

298298

22

22

22

22C

298

24

24

298A

298

303303

303A

307

306A

297

307

308

302

297

304

306

301

G I S -T

D e la wa r e D O T

N

O

BANKSRD

GREENRD

SCHOO

LLA

NRDRD

AU

TU

MN

RD

BAY

LONG NECK RD

AN

GATERRD

ERY RD

ST

EV

EN

SPHIL RDS HILL RD

FRIENDSHIP RD

CA

NN

ON

RD

MOUNTJOY

R

DCAMP RD

DR

AN

E

23

23

5

24

299

299

298

298298

22

22

22

22C

298

24

24

298A

298

303303

303A

307

306A

297

307

308

302

297

304

306

301

G I S -T

D e la wa r e D O T

N

SR 26, ASSAWOMAN BAY TO US113

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: In conjunction with the SR 26 Advisory Committee, DelDOT developed specific recommendations to address theidentified project needs. The recommendations were presented at a Public Workshop in August 1999. The recommended improvements, which aredesigned to improve the operational efficiency of SR 26 and the surrounding local road network, are listed below:

1. Intersections• SR 26/SR 54/S365 (Clarksville) – Realign intersection.• SR 26 and intersections with Railway Road, Grants Road, Woodland Road and Windmill Road – Install bypass lanes/left-turn lanes.• SR 26/Old Mill Road – Improve signal timings.• SR 26/Central Avenue – Install SB right-turn lane, install EB right turn cutout.• SR 26/West Avenue – Install traffic signal, realign intersection, add left-turn lanes on SR 26.

2. Alternate Route - Improve cross section to 11-ft. travel lanes and 5-ft. shoulders on Roads 353, 352, 84, and 368 to provide for an alternate to SR 26 and animproved bicycle route.

3. Sidewalks – Install new sidewalks and repair the existing sidewalks from Old Mill Road to Assawoman Canal.

4. Improve access – Improve commercial access points (delineation, channelization) between Clarksville and the Assawoman Canal.

5. Shoulders – Improve/add shoulders along SR 26 to a minimum width of 5 feet to provide adequate bicycle facilities, between Clarksville and the Assawoman Canal.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: In the summer and fall of 1998, the Department collected traffic count data on SR 26 from the Assawoman Canal to US113. Based on thetraffic information and an inventory of existing conditions in the study area, a Project Needs Report was completed in February 1999. The Needs Report identified fourcomponents that contribute to the need for improvements to SR 26.

SR 26, ASSAWOMAN BAY TO US113 (CONTINUED)

1. Congestion• Primarily concentrated in Dagsboro and Ocean View.• High summer average daily traffic and weekend traffic, in excess of 20,000 vehicles per day on summer weekends.• Failing level of service at the following SR 26 intersections:

• West Avenue• Central Avenue• Route 17• Route 20• Main Street South (Dagsboro)

• Low average speeds.2. Safety

• Higher than average accident rate between Clarksville and Old Mill Road.• High number of accidents at six intersections along SR 26.

3. Access – Many businesses along SR 26 have no (or poorly delineated) access points, particularly in Millville and Ocean View, which contributes to potentiallyhazardous situations and additional backups.

4. Roadway Conditions – Lack of adequate shoulder areas, particularly for bicyclists in Millville and Ocean View.

The findings of the Needs Report were presented in February 1999 to the SR 26 Advisory Committee, a group that includes local government leaders, business owners,developers, and local residents. The Advisory Committee concurred with the conclusions included in the Needs Report.

Alternate Route

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 38Senatorial District 20

SR 26, ASSAWOMAN BAY TO US113 (CONTINUED)

Dagsboro Intersection SR 26, Atlantic Avenue

EST COSTINDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,450 2,012 1,550 0

Alt. Route, Omar Rd.(S353), 100% ST 1,250 PE 1,250Windmill Rd.(S368) 100% ST 100 R/W 100

80% FHWA 7,560 C 7,560

SR 26, Atlantic Avenue 100% ST 1,250 PE 1,250100% ST 500 R/W 500

80% FHWA 7,750 C 7,750

Dagsboro Intersection 100% ST 100 C 100

All $ X 1,000

SUSSEX COUNTY EAST/WEST IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The Department of Transportation has conducted anextensive review of Sussex county roadways and presented the findings in a final report to SussexCounty. We will be working with the County, along with other interested parties, to implementthe recommendations on a phased basis. Possible improvements include the following:

A. SR 24, Planning Study in FY 2002.B. SR 54 Planning Study in FY 2002.C. SR 23 Planning Study in FY 2003.D. Study of 14 intersections in FY 2003, FY 2004, FY 2005.E. Guardrail improvements throughout the County in FY 2002.F. Geometric realignment improvements on SR 20 in FY 2004.G. Culvert extensions on SR 54 in FY 2003.H. Paved shoulder installation on SR 26 from US113 to Shaft Ox Corner.

Funding is reserved for the above improvements. As these studies are completed and projectelements handed off for preliminary design and activities, these funds will be allocated to effect

the improvements identified for construction.County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District:Senatorial District:

EST COST

FMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07

PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF

0 3,000 5,000 1,000 1,000100% ST 2,000 PE 2,000100% ST 3,000 ENV 3,000100% ST 5,000 R/W 5,000

80% FHWA 10,000 C 5,000 5,000

All $ X 1,000

US 13 / US113 CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include:• Delmar median improvements – modify median with cross over adjustments and turn lanes.• US 13 / US 13A/ S 46 Seaford – modify intersection.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To reduce traffic congestion and preserve capacity of the corridor.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 35,39,40Senatorial District: 19, 21

EST COSTFMB ID INDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 0 0 0

Delmar Median Imp’s 100% ST 11 1180% FHWA 127 127

US 13/US113/S 46100% ST 10 10

80% FHWA 115 115

All $ X 1,000

US 13 / US113 CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DELMAR IMPROVEMENTS SEAFORD IMPROVEMENTS

SU

SS

EX

HIG

HW

AY

EY

CH

UR

CH

RD

LD RACE TRACK RDDELMAR

RD

IRON HILL RD

ST

. GE

OR

GE

SR

D

DE

LMA

RR

D

WALLER RD.

FRANCIS

ST.YORKST.

ROSELINCOLN AVE.DELAWARE AVE.JEWELL ST.

ST.GROVE

FIR

ST

ST

.

SE

CO

ND

ST

. FO

UR

TH

ST

.

FI F

THS

T.

SIX

TH

ST

.

SE

VE

NT

HS

T.

EIG

HT

HST

.

BIS

TA

TE

BLV

D.

HA

NTW

ERKE

R

ELLIS PKY.

TE

NT

HST

.

BEAUCHAMP

JONES TERR.

DR

.

WE

ST

ER

LEE

WOODSIDE

PINESIDEJEWELL ST.

GROVE

BYNUM LA.

BIS

TA

TE

BLV

D.

N.

PE

NN

SY

LVA

NI A

AV

E

SU

SS

EX

HIG

HW

AY

EY

CH

UR

CH

RD

LD RACE TRACK RDDELMAR

RD

IRON HILL RD

ST

. GE

OR

GE

SR

D

DE

LMA

RR

D

WALLER RD.

FRANCIS

ST.YORKST.

ROSELINCOLN AVE.DELAWARE AVE.JEWELL ST.

ST.GROVE

FIR

ST

ST

.

SE

CO

ND

ST

. FO

UR

TH

ST

.

FI F

THS

T.

SIX

TH

ST

.

SE

VE

NT

HS

T.

EIG

HT

HST

.

BIS

TA

TE

BLV

D.

HA

NTW

ERKE

R

ELLIS PKY.

TE

NT

HST

.

BEAUCHAMP

JONES TERR.

DR

.

WE

ST

ER

LEE

WOODSIDE

PINESIDEJEWELL ST.

GROVE

BYNUM LA.

BIS

TA

TE

BLV

D.

N.

PE

NN

SY

LVA

NI A

AV

E

ESKRIDGE RD

ES

KR

IDG

ER

DS

AN

FIL

IP

HERRING RUN RD

HEARNS POND RD

HE

AR

NS

MIL

LR

D

SWAIN RD

ELKS

RD

OLDFURNACE

RD

SU

SS

EX

HI G

HW

AY

SSSTATIO

NR

D

SP

EC

KR

D

DR

MARATHON

CT

BRADFORD S

BRYAN STDOGWOOD AVEYO

UN

G

GARDEN LA

SUSSEXAVE

DOLBY

BR

INS

FIE

LD

TH

OM

AS

ON

SH

OR

ED

R PKY

AV

E

DR

NO

RT

HS

T

MAPLE

DR

BEE

CH

LA

BURTON ST

MAINS

YLALA

H

ORT

BINDR

AT

LAN

TA

DRTLANTA CIR

ANTA CIRNTAIR

MA

DI

JEF

FEE

LLO

C C

MIDDLEFORD A

PITT

E

534

534

535

532531

533

46

531

46

543

544

546

546

544

13

544B

544A

46

ESKRIDGE RD

ES

KR

IDG

ER

DS

AN

FIL

IP

HERRING RUN RD

HEARNS POND RD

HE

AR

NS

MIL

LR

D

SWAIN RD

ELKS

RD

OLDFURNACE

RD

SU

SS

EX

HI G

HW

AY

SSSTATIO

NR

D

SP

EC

KR

D

DR

MARATHON

CT

BRADFORD S

BRYAN STDOGWOOD AVEYO

UN

G

GARDEN LA

SUSSEXAVE

DOLBY

BR

INS

FIE

LD

TH

OM

AS

ON

SH

OR

ED

R PKY

AV

E

DR

NO

RT

HS

T

MAPLE

DR

BEE

CH

LA

BURTON ST

MAINS

YLALA

H

ORT

BINDR

AT

LAN

TA

DRTLANTA CIR

ANTA CIRNTAIR

MA

DI

JEF

FEE

LLO

C C

MIDDLEFORD A

PITT

E

534

534

535

532531

533

46

531

46

543

544

546

546

544

13

544B

544A

46

CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, SUSSEX COUNTY

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements will focus on the southbound side of US 13 and include:

• Bridgeville Service Road – Construction of a parallel service road from S 40 to Cannon Street

• Laurel Service Road - Construction of a parallel service road from US 9 to S568 in Laurel

• Seaford Service Road - Construction of a parallel service road at S534 to serve an area currently zoned for development.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To reduce traffic congestion and preserve capacity in the US 13 corridor.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 39,40,Senatorial District: 19, 21,

EST COSTFMB ID INDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 165 2,341 87 588

Bridgeville 100% ST 350 PE 36980% FHWA 1,150 C 1,279

Laurel 100% ST 35 PE 35100% ST 270 R/W 285

80% FHWA 403 C 437

Seaford 100% ST 130 PE 130100% ST 1,600 R/W 1,688

80% FHWA 1,495 C 1,663

All $ X 1,000

CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, SUSSEX COUNTY (CONTINUED)

BRIDGEVILLE LAUREL

SEAFORD

20

OLD

MEADOW

RD

DO

ESK

RID

HERRING RUN RD

THARP RD

HE

AR

N

STEIN HWY

CONCORD RD

SU

SS

EX

HIG

HW

A

SC

H

ATION

RD

PINEVIEW

STST

EVERGREEN

AVE

WALNUT

DR

BRYAN STDOGWOOD AVEYO

UN

G

RDEN LA

N SHOORESCT DR

SC

BEE

CH

LA

BURTON ST

MAINST

UST ST

TWOOD

AK STDR

WO

OD

LAW

N

AV

E

TR

EA

DST

RO

DN

EY

STARMST

ARBUTUS AVE

NY

LON

BLV

DN

YLO

NB

L

EX

TH

USTO

NS

TW

ES

TIV

YDR

RO

SETR

EE

LA

WILLE

Y ST

GRAY

HOLLY

AT

LAN

TAD

R

CIR

IR

R

K DR

MA

DISO

N

AGE

MA

GN

OLIA DR

ARBUTUS AVE

EAS

T

IVYDR

LAN

TAN

AC

YP

RE

SS

HU

RLE

YA

VE

TULIP

ST

ST

SH

IPLEYS

TS

TS

T ST ST

WA

LNU

TLAH

ALL

HA

LLC

YP

RE

SS

PO

RTE

RB

RA

DFO

RD

WILLIA

MC

HES

TE

POPLARST

SPRUCEST

HOLLY

RA

YM

ON

DLA

KING

VIRGINIA AVE

DELAWARE PL

NANTICOKE AVE

WASHINGTON

STATEST

ST

ST

ST

ST STSTSTSTST

MAPLE

WALNUT

CHESTNUT

OAK

CE

DA

RA

VE

HIGH

PEA

RL

CO

NW

ELLN

AR

C

THIRDSPRUCE

FOURTHFIFTH

SIXTH

PINE

ST

AR

CH

MA

RK

ETS

CH

OO

LLA

STATE

LINDEN

WA

SH

ING

TO

N

WATER

ST

FRO

NT

ST

FRO

NT

ST

EX

T

HURLEY

FRO

NT

ST

COLLINSAVE

NO

RT

HS

T

CH

ANDL

ER

NU

TTER

LA

PERKINSBARBARA ST

CLARENCEWOOLFORD

THOMPSONLINCOLN

POPLARKING

RO

SSST

NYLON AVE

DUTTON AVE

LITTLELEA

GUE

DR

PINE

CONE

DR

VICTORIAA

VE

RIVERSIDE DR

JAM

OR

EDR

SUSSEX

BEAVE

R DA

MDRRONMORE DR

RIV

ER

VIS

TAR

IVE

RSI D

E

FOURTH

DOGW

O

DRNANTICOKEDR

CIR

CEDAR LANEHEMLOCKR

D

HIC

KO

RY

PIN

EH

OLL

YO

AK

CO

UN

TR

YS

PU

RC

E

RD R

D RD

RD

RD

RD

R

PITTRD

WILKINSON

DRCHESTNUT

LA

RIV

ER

S

END

DR

HA

RB

OR

SN

UG

DR

SURREY

DRKENM

OREFAYMAURY

AVEELM ST

CHARLESPINE

3

535

21

20

13

93

539

5433

534

534

639

535

535

530

486A20A

46

13

20

OLD

MEADOW

RD

DO

ESK

RID

HERRING RUN RD

THARP RD

HE

AR

N

STEIN HWY

CONCORD RD

SU

SS

EX

HIG

HW

A

SC

H

ATION

RD

PINEVIEW

STST

EVERGREEN

AVE

WALNUT

DR

BRYAN STDOGWOOD AVEYO

UN

G

RDEN LA

N SHOORESCT DR

SC

BEE

CH

LA

BURTON ST

MAINST

UST ST

TWOOD

AK STDR

WO

OD

LAW

N

AV

E

TR

EA

DST

RO

DN

EY

STARMST

ARBUTUS AVE

NY

LON

BLV

DN

YLO

NB

L

EX

TH

USTO

NS

TW

ES

TIV

YDR

RO

SETR

EE

LA

WILLE

Y ST

GRAY

HOLLY

AT

LAN

TAD

R

CIR

IR

R

K DR

MA

DISO

N

AGE

MA

GN

OLIA DR

ARBUTUS AVE

EAS

T

IVYDR

LAN

TAN

AC

YP

RE

SS

HU

RLE

YA

VE

TULIP

ST

ST

SH

IPLEYS

TS

TS

T ST ST

WA

LNU

TLAH

ALL

HA

LLC

YP

RE

SS

PO

RTE

RB

RA

DFO

RD

WILLIA

MC

HES

TE

POPLARST

SPRUCEST

HOLLY

RA

YM

ON

DLA

KING

VIRGINIA AVE

DELAWARE PL

NANTICOKE AVE

WASHINGTON

STATEST

ST

ST

ST

ST STSTSTSTST

MAPLE

WALNUT

CHESTNUT

OAK

CE

DA

RA

VE

HIGH

PEA

RL

CO

NW

ELLN

AR

C

THIRDSPRUCE

FOURTHFIFTH

SIXTH

PINE

ST

AR

CH

MA

RK

ETS

CH

OO

LLA

STATE

LINDEN

WA

SH

ING

TO

N

WATER

ST

FRO

NT

ST

FRO

NT

ST

EX

T

HURLEY

FRO

NT

ST

COLLINSAVE

NO

RT

HS

T

CH

ANDL

ER

NU

TTER

LA

PERKINSBARBARA ST

CLARENCEWOOLFORD

THOMPSONLINCOLN

POPLARKING

RO

SSST

NYLON AVE

DUTTON AVE

LITTLELEA

GUE

DR

PINE

CONE

DR

VICTORIAA

VE

RIVERSIDE DR

JAM

OR

EDR

SUSSEX

BEAVE

R DA

MDRRONMORE DR

RIV

ER

VI S

TAR

IVE

RSI D

E

FOURTH

DOGW

O

DRNANTICOKEDR

CIR

CEDAR LANEHEMLOCKR

D

HIC

KO

RY

PI N

EH

OLL

YO

AK

CO

UN

TR

YS

PU

RC

E

RD R

D RD

RD

RD

RD

R

PITTRD

WILKINSON

DR

CHESTNUT

LA

RIV

ER

S

END

DR

HA

RB

OR

SN

UG

DR

SURREY

DRKENM

OREFAYMAURY

AVEELM ST

CHARLESPINE

3

535

21

20

13

93

539

5433

534

534

639

535

535

530

486A20A

46

13

24

CHIPMANS POND RD

RD

ODLAND FERRY RD

D

SYCAMORE

TRUSCHOOL BUS LANE

OAK LANE DR

RD

SAILORRD

CH

IPM

AN

S

CHASE

DR

R

CREEKRDMARYLAND

C

RANDALLST

GLADYSST

VANBUREN

ST

JACKSONDR

H

WO

LF

ES

T

ST ST

ST

ST

STST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

HEARN AVEHORSEY AVEALLENAVEAVE

AVEAV

EB

OY

CELAUREL ELL

IS

PR

ET

TYM

AN

PU

RN

ELL

DR

WH

ITE

LAKE

DR

WA

TE

RV

IEWAV

E

AVE

GO

VE

RNO

RS

LAN

SIN

G

KIN

GS

T

STCOOPER

FRONT

WILLO

W

ST

PIN

ES

T

LEWISDR

LACHIPMANS

BROADLAKESIDEDR

SH

OR

TA

VE

WILS

ON

SU

SSE

XA

VE

BRO

OK

LYNAVE

DELAW

AREAVE

WASHINGTONGEORGETOWN

ROAD

DANIELS

MARVIL DRLOCUSTJUNIPER

PIN

E

E. P

OP

LAR

ST

CE

NT

RA

LA

VE

OA

KMARKET

ST

TOWNSEND

ELM

MA

PLES

TB

ELL

EA

VE

SIXTH

SIXTH

GR

EENS

GIB

SO

NC

RO

CKE

TTW

EB

B

LITTLECREEK

SEVENTHCENTEREIGHTH

NINTHTENTH

W.

PO

PLA

R

CLAYTON

EIGHTHDE

SH

IEL

DSCANNON

ST

EVERGREEN DR

FO

RE

ST

LA

FOURTH STFIFTH ST

HOW

ARD

ST

SUNSET

PIN

ETR

EE

HOLLY

BIG MILLS BRIDGE

SY

CAM

OR

ELA

KURTZ

DR

PA

RK

LAAVE

AVE

AVE

AVE

ST

WALNUT

WILSONST C

ULV

ER

DR

ST

CHIPMANS

PR

UC

EST

MECHANIC

ST

ST

DE

WE

Y

ST

AVE

2ND

MEADOW

BRANCHDRIVE

MEAD

OW

BRA

LAU

PARKDR

IV FO

461

465

462

49924A

69

7013

492 24

24

78A

70

466

479

24

CHIPMANS POND RD

RD

ODLAND FERRY RD

D

SYCAMORE

TRUSCHOOL BUS LANE

OAK LANE DR

RD

SAILORRD

CH

IPM

AN

S

CHASE

DR

R

CREEKRDMARYLAND

C

RANDALLST

GLADYSST

VANBUREN

ST

JACKSONDR

H

WO

LF

ES

T

ST ST

ST

ST

STST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

ST

HEARN AVEHORSEY AVEALLENAVEAVE

AVEAV

EB

OY

CELAUREL ELL

IS

PR

ET

TYM

AN

PU

RN

ELL

DR

WH

ITE

LAKE

DR

WA

TE

RV

IEWAV

E

AVE

GO

VE

RNO

RS

LAN

SIN

G

KIN

GS

T

STCOOPER

FRONT

WILLO

W

ST

PIN

ES

T

LEWISDR

LACHIPMANS

BROADLAKESIDEDR

SH

OR

TA

VE

WILS

ON

SU

SSE

XA

VE

BRO

OK

LYNAVE

DELAW

AREAVE

WASHINGTONGEORGETOWN

ROAD

DANIELS

MARVIL DRLOCUSTJUNIPER

PIN

E

E. P

OP

LAR

ST

CE

NT

RA

LA

VE

OA

K

MARKET

ST

TOWNSEND

ELM

MA

PLES

TB

ELL

EA

VE

SIXTH

SIXTH

GR

EENS

GIB

SO

NC

RO

CKE

TTW

EB

B

LITTLECREEK

SEVENTHCENTEREIGHTH

NINTHTENTH

W.

PO

PLA

R

CLAYTON

EIGHTHDE

SH

IEL

DSCANNON

ST

EVERGREEN DR

FO

RE

ST

LA

FOURTH STFIFTH ST

HOW

ARD

ST

SUNSET

PIN

ETR

EE

HOLLY

BIG MILLS BRIDGE

SY

CAM

OR

ELA

KURTZ

DR

PA

RK

LAAVE

AVE

AVE

AVE

ST

WALNUT

WILSONST C

ULV

ER

DR

ST

CHIPMAN

SP

RU

CEST

MECHANIC

ST

ST

DE

WE

Y

ST

AVE

2ND

MEADOW

BRANCHDRIVE

MEAD

OW

BRA

LAU

PARKDR

IV FO461

465

462

49924A

69

7013

492 24

24

78A

70

466

479

404

404A

404AS

STCHURCH

MA

INS

T

SUNNYSIDE RDSEASHORE HIGHWAY

FEDERALSBURGRD

NES

RD

FAW

N

REDDEN

NEWTON RD

D

SPRUCE

ST ST

ST STSTST

STST

STST

STST

ST

ST

BIRCH

R.R

.AV

E

CANNON

GUMALL

EY

1ST

ST

JOHN

MARKETMILL ST

UNION

DELAWARE AVE

PINE

WALNUT

MAPLE

CEDAR

CHESTNUT ALLEYEDGEWOOD

SUSSEX

SUSSEX ELLIOTT

ELLIOTTAVE

AVE

JACOB

EARLEE AVE

CANNON

DRELM

WASHINGTON AVE

EMORY

CA

NN

ON

ST

LAW

SST

WILLIA

MS

T

PAR

KA

LLEY

ME

CH

AN

ICS

TC

HE

RR

YA

LLE

Y

FRUITLAND AVE

642

17

17

561

564

404

582

563

600

565

5583

40

404

404A

404AS

STCHURCH

MA

INS

T

SUNNYSIDE RDSEASHORE HIGHWAY

FEDERALSBURGRD

NES

RD

FAW

N

REDDEN

NEWTON RD

D

SPRUCE

ST ST

ST STSTST

STST

STST

STST

ST

ST

BIRCH

R.R

.AV

E

CANNON

GUMALL

EY

1ST

ST

JOHN

MARKETMILL ST

UNION

DELAWARE AVE

PINE

WALNUT

MAPLE

CEDAR

CHESTNUT ALLEYEDGEWOOD

SUSSEX

SUSSEX ELLIOTT

ELLIOTTAVE

AVE

JACOB

EARLEE AVE

CANNON

DRELM

WASHINGTON AVE

EMORY

CA

NN

ON

ST

LAW

SST

WILLIA

MS

T

PAR

KA

LLEY

ME

CH

AN

ICS

TC

HE

RR

YA

LLE

Y

FRUITLAND AVE

642

17

17

561

564

404

582

563

600

565

5583

40

SR 1, CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, SUSSEX COUNTY

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:

SR 1 & SR 16PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Construct a grade-separated interchange at thesignalized intersection of SR1 and SR16, along with the removal of median crossovers.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To enhance safety and improve traffic flow inaccordance with the SR1 Corridor Capacity Preservation Program.

SR 1 & SR 30PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Extend SR 30 to SR 1 Business

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To reduce traffic congestion and preserve capacity in theSR 1 corridor, eliminate the need for signalization.

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 36Senatorial District: 18

EST COSTFMB ID INDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 742 800 1,733 0

96-122-01 SR 30 Extension to SR 1, 100% ST 100 R/W 100Business 80% FHWA 3,031 C 3,031

99-122-01 SR 16/SR 1 & SR 16 80% FHWA 960 PE 960Interchange 100% ST 250 ENV 250

100% ST 1,100 R/W 550 55080% FHWA 8,000 C 8,666

All $ X 1,000

SR 1, CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, SUSSEX COUNTY (CONTINUED)

A. SR 30 @ BUS SR 1 B. SR 1/SR 16

30

1

RD

VERDAM

RD

KIRBY

RD

D

ARGO'S CORNER RD

RD

GOLDENRODCIR

HIDDEN MEADOWS TERRACE

JOSHUA

DR

LINDSA

YLAM

ATTHEW

CIR

SHELBYWAY

E. SAR

ATOG

ARD

W. S

ARATOG

AR

D

W. Y

ORKT

OW

NRD

E. YO

RKTO

WN

RD

WATSON

D

VALLEY

FORGE

DR

BRANDYWINE RD

LEXIN

GTO

NDR

INGTON

DR

ERD

N. BRANDYWINE

RD

CONCORDDR

PRINCETONRD

SARATOGARD

206

206

7

207A

212

7

14

209

30

1

RD

VERDAM

RD

KIRBY

RD

D

ARGO'S CORNER RD

RD

GOLDENRODCIR

HIDDEN MEADOWS TERRACE

JOSHUA

DR

LINDSA

YLAM

ATTHEW

CIR

SHELBYWAY

E. SAR

ATOG

ARD

W. S

ARATOG

AR

D

W. Y

ORKT

OW

NRD

E. YO

RKTO

WN

RD

WATSON

D

VALLEY

FORGE

DR

BRANDYWINE RD

LEXIN

GTO

NDR

INGTON

DR

ERD

N. BRANDYWINE

RD

CONCORDDR

PRINCETONRD

SARATOGARD

206

206

7

207A

212

7

14

209

PAYNT

BROADKILL RD

A

LAN

KR

D

JEFFER

SO

NR

D

OLDSRD

ZION CHURCH RDRD

EVA DR

233

234C 234A235

16

234

233

16

236

PAYNT

BROADKILL RD

A

LAN

KR

D

JEFFER

SO

NR

D

OLDSRD

ZION CHURCH RDRD

EVA DR

233

234C 234A235

16

234

233

16

236

SR 1, FROM SR 24 TO NORTH OF US 9 (FIVE POINTS)

PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project involves widening theshoulder on southbound SR1 from north of Five Points to north of Route 24.This section of southbound SR 1 has constrained capacity and a widenedshoulder could facilitate its multi-modal usage in accordance with AASHTO’srecently updated guidelines. This project also adds a sidewalk and “greenarea” that is consistent with the Charles B. Mills Boulevard concept. It willrequire right-of-way acquisition and utility relocation.

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To eliminate traffic backups into the City ofRehoboth

County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 37Senatorial District: 20

EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007

OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ

TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,424 540 1,424 1,246 2,002

100% ST 270 LOC/ENV 80100% ST 700 PE 369100% ST 2,150 R/W 1,055 1,246

80% FHWA 9,000 C 10,012

All $ X 1,000

9

24

D

MUNCY BRANCH RD

WOLF N

CLAY RD

KIN

GS

HIG

HW

AY

ELLTOW

NR

D

POSTAL LA

OVERDR

OBI

NSV

ILLE

RD

RD

DR

DO

VE

KNOLL DO

VE

KNOLL

CIR

DOVE

DR

TURTLE

PIN

EWO

HOLLY

RTADO

CTT

DARTMOU

TH

DR.

MC

NICOL

CEDAR

COLGATEDR

VASSAR DR

BY

RN

MA

WR

DR

PR

INS

TO

NC

T MA

RTIN

LAP

AYN

TERLA

TRUITTAVE

CARRIAGELA

WAGON

WHEEL

GUNPOWDER

POWDER

HORN

CANDLELIGHT

SPINNINGW

HEEL

LANTERNLA

LANTERNLA

COLONIAL LA

BRIA

ND

RCO

LON

IAL

LAO

LDC

OA

CH

DR

SAB

RINA

DR

TIFF

ANY

DR

BRIA

ND

R

ELKCAMP

ELK CAMP

HIGHALPINE

FIRSTSECONDST

THIRDFOURTH

FIFTHSIXTH

BEECHDR

ELM

LA

SPRUCE

EDGEWOOD

MAPLE

OAK

PIN

E

LOC

UST

LA

LINDE

NLA

MULBERRY LA

DOGWOODDR

CE

DA

RD

R

DR

DR

DR

LA

LA

HOW

ARDD

R

NORTH

RD

E ISACCSDR

WISSACS

DR

MELS

ON

RD

TULIP DR

WIL

LOW

DR

JUNIPER

DR

BIRCH

DRPOPLARLA

LA

MA

GN

OLIA

DE

LP

AV

DELPA

NORTH

DR

NO

RTHR

AM

SOU

THR

285

270

270A

283

283

277

285B

18

275

275

276

14

1212

268

268A9

24

D

MUNCY BRANCH RD

WOLF N

CLAY RD

KIN

GS

HIG

HW

AY

ELLTOW

NR

D

POSTAL LA

OVERDR

OBI

NSV

ILLE

RD

RD

DR

DO

VE

KNOLL DO

VE

KNOLL

CIR

DOVE

DR

TURTLE

PIN

EWO

HOLLY

RTADO

CTT

DARTMOU

TH

DR.

MC

NICOL

CEDAR

COLGATEDR

VASSAR DR

BY

RN

MA

WR

DR

PR

INS

TO

NC

T MA

RTIN

LAP

AYN

TERLA

TRUITTAVE

CARRIAGELA

WAGON

WHEEL

GUNPOWDER

POWDER

HORN

CANDLELIGHT

SPINNINGW

HEEL

LANTERNLA

LANTERNLA

COLON IAL LA

BRIA

ND

RCO

LON

IAL

LAO

LDC

OA

CH

DR

SAB

RINA

DR

TIFF

ANY

DR

BRIA

ND

R

ELKCAMP

ELK CAMP

HIGHALPINE

FIRSTSECONDST

THIRDFOURTH

FIFTHSIXTH

BEECHDR

ELM

LA

SPRUCE

EDGEWOOD

MAPLE

OAK

PIN

E

LOC

UST

LA

LINDE

NLA

MULBERRY LA

DOGWOODDR

CE

DA

RD

R

DR

DR

DR

LA

LA

HOW

ARDD

R

NORTH

RD

E ISACCSDR

WISSACS

DR

MELS

ON

RD

TULIP DR

WIL

LOW

DR

JUNIPER

DR

BIRCH

DRPOPLARLA

LA

MA

GN

OLIA

DE

LP

AV

DELPA

NORTH

DR

NO

RTHR

AM

SOU

THR

285

270

270A

283

283

277

285B

18

275

275

276

14

1212

268

268A