transparency international corruption perceptions · pdf fileperhaps as a consequence of the...

Download Transparency International Corruption Perceptions · PDF filePerhaps as a consequence of the Panama Papers revealing the offshore holdings of many public offi cials, commitments to

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: duongliem

Post on 06-Feb-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2016

  • Corruption and inequality feed off each other, creating a vicious circle between corruption, unequal distribution of power in society, and unequal distribution of wealth. As the Panama Papers showed, it is still far too easy for the rich and powerful to exploit the opaqueness of the global financial system to enrich themselves at the expense of the public good.

    Based on expert opinion from around the world, the Corruption Perceptions Index measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption worldwide. The findings are less than encouraging. Not a single country comes close to top marks, while over 120 countries score below 50 on the scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). This means less than a third of countries are even above the midpoint.

    In too many countries, people are deprived of their most basic needs and go to bed hungry every night because of corruption, while the powerful and corrupt enjoy lavish lifestyles with impunity.

    Contents 2 The global picture

    4 Country contrast

    6 How does your country measure up?

    8 Americas

    9 Asia Pacific

    10 Europe and Central Asia

    11 Middle East and North Africa

    12 Sub-Saharan Africa

    Access the full 2016 Corruption Perceptions Index at www.transparency.org/cpi

    Corruption hurts all countries. In our indexs lower-scoring countries, people frequently face situations of bribery and extortion, rely on basic services that have been undermined by the misappropriation of funds, and confront official indifference when seeking redress from authorities that are on the take. In higher-scoring countries the situation may seem less obvious in the daily lives of citizens, but closed-door deals, illicit finance, and patchy law enforcement exacerbate many forms of corruption at home and abroad. We do not have the luxury of time, says Ugaz. Corruption needs to be fought with urgency, so that the lives of people across the world improve.

    Contents 2 The global picture

    4 Country contrast

    6 How does your country measure up?

    8 Americas

    9 Asia Pacific

    10 Europe and Central Asia

    11 Middle East and North Africa

    12 Sub-Saharan Africa

    Jos Ugaz, Chair, Transparency International

    1Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 |

  • Score 0 25 50 75 100

    highly corrupt very clean

    43 66 38 34 31GlobalAverage score

    EU & Western EuropeAverage score

    Middle East& North AfricaAverage score

    Eastern Europe& Central AsiaAverage score

    Sub-Saharan AfricaAverage score

    Top: Denmark, New Zealand (90)

    Bottom: South Sudan (11), Somalia (10)

    Top: Denmark (90)

    Bottom: Bulgaria (41)

    Top: United Arab Emirates (66)

    Bottom: Syria (13)

    Top: Georgia (57)

    Bottom: Uzbekistan (21)

    Top: Botswana (60)

    Bottom: Somalia (10)

    44 44Asia PacificAverage score

    AmericasAverage score

    Top: New Zealand (90)

    Bottom: North Korea (12)

    Top: Canada (82)

    Bottom: Venezuela (17)

    LESS THAN 50 = SERIOUS CORRUPTION PROBLEM

    69% 58% 100% 6 billion +of countries worldwide score below 50

    of G20 countries score less than 50

    of BRICS countries score less than 50

    people live in countries with a serious corruption problem

    The global picture

    Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 || Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 32

  • Lowest scorers

    South Sudan

    11Top scorers

    New Zealand

    90

    Top scorers

    Denmark

    90

    Lowest scorers

    Somalia

    10

    Whats changed?

    Countries that have improved include

    Countries that have declined include

    AlbaniaAustriaCzech RepublicGreeceIndonesia

    LatviaSenegalSlovakiaUnited Kingdom

    AustraliaBrazilGambiaHungaryJapanMadagascarMalawiMexico

    MozambiqueSpainSri LankaTanzaniaTurkeyUgandaYemen

    Comparison of 2012 and 2016 performance

    Country contrast

    Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 || Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 54

  • How does your country measure up?The perceived levels of public sector corruption in 176 countries/territories around the world.

    176 countries176 scores

    SCORE

    0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100 No data

    Very clean

    Highly corrupt

    1 Denmark 901 New Zealand 903 Finland 894 Sweden 885 Switzerland 866 Norway 857 Singapore 848 Netherlands 839 Canada 8210 Germany 8110 Luxembourg 8110 United Kingdom 8113 Australia 7914 Iceland 7815 Belgium 7715 Hong Kong 7717 Austria 7518 United States 7419 Ireland 7320 Japan 7221 Uruguay 7122 Estonia 7023 France 69

    24 Bahamas 66

    24 Chile 66

    24 United Arab Emirates 66

    27 Bhutan 65

    28 Israel 64

    29 Poland 62

    29 Portugal 62

    31 Barbados 61

    31 Qatar 61

    31 Slovenia 61

    31 Taiwan 61

    35 Botswana 60

    35 Saint Lucia 60

    35 Saint Vincent and The Grenadines

    60

    38 Cape Verde 59

    38 Dominica 59

    38 Lithuania 59

    41 Brunei 58

    41 Costa Rica 58

    41 Spain 58

    44 Georgia 57

    44 Latvia 57

    46 Grenada 5647 Cyprus 5547 Czech Republic 5547 Malta 5550 Mauritius 5450 Rwanda 5452 Korea (South) 5353 Namibia 5254 Slovakia 5155 Croatia 4955 Malaysia 4957 Hungary 4857 Jordan 4857 Romania 4860 Cuba 4760 Italy 4762 Sao Tome and Principe 4662 Saudi Arabia 4664 Montenegro 4564 Oman 4564 Senegal 4564 South Africa 4564 Suriname 45

    69 Greece 44

    70 Bahrain 43

    70 Ghana 43

    72 Burkina Faso 42

    72 Serbia 42

    72 Solomon Islands 42

    75 Bulgaria 41

    75 Kuwait 41

    75 Tunisia 41

    75 Turkey 41

    79 Belarus 40

    79 Brazil 40

    79 China 40

    79 India 40

    83 Albania 39

    83 Bosnia andHerzegovina

    39

    83 Jamaica 39

    83 Lesotho 39

    87 Mongolia 38

    87 Panama 38

    87 Zambia 38

    90 Colombia 37

    90 Indonesia 3790 Liberia 3790 Morocco 3790 The FYR of Macedonia 3795 Argentina 3695 Benin 3695 El Salvador 3695 Kosovo 3695 Maldives 3695 Sri Lanka 36101 Gabon 35101 Niger 35101 Peru 35101 Philippines 35101 Thailand 35101 Timor-Leste 35101 Trinidad and Tobago 35108 Algeria 34108 Cte dIvoire 34108 Egypt 34108 Ethiopia 34108 Guyana 34113 Armenia 33113 Bolivia 33

    113 Vietnam 33116 Mali 32116 Pakistan 32116 Tanzania 32116 Togo 32120 Dominican Republic 31120 Ecuador 31120 Malawi 31123 Azerbaijan 30123 Djibouti 30123 Honduras 30123 Laos 30123 Mexico 30123 Moldova 30123 Paraguay 30123 Sierra Leone 30131 Iran 29131 Kazakhstan 29131 Nepal 29131 Russia 29131 Ukraine 29136 Guatemala 28136 Kyrgyzstan 28136 Lebanon 28

    136 Myanmar 28136 Nigeria 28136 Papua New Guinea 28142 Guinea 27142 Mauritania 27142 Mozambique 27145 Bangladesh 26145 Cameroon 26145 Gambia 26145 Kenya 26145 Madagascar 26145 Nicaragua 26151 Tajikistan 25151 Uganda 25153 Comoros 24154 Turkmenistan 22154 Zimbabwe 22156 Cambodia 21156 Democratic

    Republic of Congo21

    156 Uzbekistan 21159 Burundi 20159 Central African Republic 20159 Chad 20

    159 Haiti 20159 Republic of Congo 20164 Angola 18164 Eritrea 18166 Iraq 17166 Venezuela 17168 Guinea-Bissau 16169 Afghanistan 15170 Libya 14170 Sudan 14170 Yemen 14173 Syria 13174 Korea (North) 12175 South Sudan 11176 Somalia 10

    RANK COUNTRY/TERRITORY SCORE

    Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 || Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 76

  • Asia Pacifi cAmericas

    In briefIt is not always bad to have headlines about corruption. From the Panama Papers in April to the record US$3.5 billion Odebrecht settlement in Brazil in December, 2016 was a good year in the fi ght against corruption in the Americas.

    The Panama Papers revealed that a Panamanian law fi rm helped set up thousands of secret shell companies, many of them used by corrupt politicians, criminals and tax abusers around the world. The Odebrecht settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice shed light on a company spending millions of dollars on bribing politicians and political parties across Latin America, as well as in two African countries in order to win business contracts.

    The wealthy and powerful were also increasingly placed under the spotlight. The Chilean Presidents daughter-in-law was charged in a corruption case, and former Argentinian President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner is now under investigation on corruption charges, among several other examples.

    2016 was also notable in that large corruption investigations continued to jump across national borders. On cases from Odebrecht to Petrobras and FIFA, we see increasing communication and cooperation among regulators and law enforcement throughout the region and also with their counterparts in Europe and the United States.

    One thing is clear though: even if 2016 marks the start of a shift towards more active enforcement by authorities in response to these public demands, there is still a long way to go.

    The average score on the 2016 Corruption Perceptions Index was 44 out of 100 for the Americas. Anything below 50 indicates governments are failing to tackle corruption.

    In many parts of the region, impunity continues to be a major problem. Even in countries where cases of large-scale corruption are being tackled, the risk remains that this is the result of the efforts of a small group of brave individuals rather than a long-term plan.

    Venezuela, with a score of 17, is the lowest scorer in the region. Last year saw hundreds of thousands of citizens protesting against the government. In Mexico, while the gover