transparency at stanford: open notes and provider reviews

27
Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Upload: others

Post on 29-Apr-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Page 2: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Problem

•  Lack of transparency •  Poor patient access to information •  Provider anxiety about changes in transparency

2

Page 3: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Learning Objectives •  Recognize the key elements of a physician

transparency initiative and how it can improve patient satisfaction

•  Understand current Open Notes efforts at Stanford

•  Awareness of patients desire for information about their providers and one proactive approach

3

Page 4: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Stanford Health Care

824,000 sq. foot hospital

613 licensed beds

56 operating rooms

1,194,308 clinic visits

9,743 employees

2,556 physicians

StanfordHealthCare(SHC)seekstocare,toeducate,andtodiscoverbyhealinghumanitythoughscienceandcompassion,onepa=entata=me.

26,046 inpatient admits

68,643 ER visits

1,140 interns & residents

66 licensed ICU

beds

Page 5: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Open Notes

5

Page 6: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

6

What are Open Notes?

Doctorcompletesclinicnote

Emailno=fiespa=entnoteis

ready

NoteisavailableinMyHealth

Pa=entlogsinandviews

note

Page 7: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Where Are Open Notes?

7

hFp://www.myopennotes.org/who-is-sharing-notes/

Page 8: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

What is happening at Stanford today?

•  Patients have a legal right to their medical records

•  Stanford Cancer Center and Primary Care are sharing notes since 2015

•  Stanford Children’s sharing in multiple specialties since 2016

8

Page 9: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Why complete Open Notes offering across Stanford?

•  Improves patient understanding and adherence1

•  Becoming standard of care and expectation

•  Successful experience at Stanford to date

•  Create a unified patient experience at Stanford, based on our experience to date in Cancer Care and Primary Care

9

1Delbanco,2010

Page 10: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Majority of Notes are Shared

10

64%

78%

85%

15%

84%

43%

94%

33%

88%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Percen

tofN

otesShared

CancerCenter&PrimaryCareNotesSharedOct2015-Oct2016

95%ofnotesaresharedacrossCancerCenter&PrimaryCare

Page 11: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

11

UIimprovement

Minority are Read

Page 12: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Stanford Patient Response

12

1,803responsesforMyHealthusersatpoint-of-service(CancerCenterpa<entsDecember2015–April2016)

Open Note are “useful” to 95% of Stanford Cancer Center patients with MyHealth

5%

18%

26%

51%

How often are Visit Notes by your Care Team in MyHealth useful to you?

Never

Sometimes

Usually

Always “It’spreIysimple.IknowI’mapa<entandmydoctoristhinkinginmedicaltermsaboutme.Seeingmynotesonlinemademetrustmydoctormore.”

-CancerCenterPa<ent

Page 13: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Stanford Physician Experience

•  “We thought there would be many inquiries from patients asking us to explain aspects of the notes, or correct details and inconsistencies, but the actual number of these was very low, and most providers didn’t notice the change.” – Dr. Joel Neal, Oncology

•  I’ve had two trivial episodes where patients wanted the language of our discussion revised but otherwise uneventful. That said, I am happy to write my notes more tactfully and in plain English.” – Sang Chang , MD, Primary Care

13

Page 14: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

MD Ratings

14

Page 15: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

15

ofinternetusersaresearchingforit.

Source:PerformanceInsights,TransparencyStrategies:OnlinePhysicianReviewsforImprovingCareandReducingSuffering,2014PressGaneyAssociates

59%American adults find online ratings to be

an important consideration when choosing a physician.

(Healthgrades.com, Vitals.com, Consumer Reports, Yelp…)

Provider Ratings

Page 16: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Consumerism Driving Online Physician Ratings

Source:SoSwareAdvice,“Pa<entUseofOnlineReviews–2014”

Whenpa+entssearchMostValuableInforma+ontoEvaluatePhysicianPerformance

[CATEGORY

NAME],[VALUE]

Toevaluatecurrentdoctor,20%

[CATEGORY

NAME],[VALUE]

Page 17: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Physicians Have Web Presence Whether they know it or not…

Dr. Coutre Hematologist

Dr. Mell Vascular Surgeon

Dr. Rizk Pulmonologist

Dr. Weinacker Pulmonologist

Dr. Welton Colorectal Surgeon

Nodata

Nodata

Nodata Nodata

Page 18: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Why Post MD Ratings & Comments Online?

Easyaccesstopa=entfeedbackforpa=ents/familiestosa=sfytheincreasingconsumerdemandforhealthcarera=ngs.

Posi+vemarke+ng&increasemarketshareforStanfordHealthCarephysicians(99.6%have>4stars).

ProvideStanfordHealthCarewithvisibility&controlofweb-basedra+ngsofourphysicians,ratherthandefaul=ngtosta=s=callyinvalidthirdpar=es(Healthgrades.com,Vitals.com,etc.).

IncreasedtraffictophysicianprofilepagesandotherSHCsites(MakeanAppointment).

ImprovedScores:Physicianscoresgofrom~17%intop10%à~40%intop10%.

Page 19: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

SHC’s Web Presence - Google Fall2014 December2016

Page 20: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

SHC’s Web Presence - Stanford MD Profile

Page 21: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Steps Along the Way

21

Process&Technology:Collectandunderstand

pa+entra+ngs&comments

•  Definetheprocessandrulesforpublishingra=ngs&comments.

•  Captureandanalyze

•  ~24,000MDcommentsreviewedto-date.

Educa+on&Communica+on:

Conductroadshowstophysiciangroups

•  Communicateprocessandrulesforpublishing.

•  Offerphysiciancoachingandotherassistance.

Transparency:GoLivewithnewPhysicianProfiles

Governance:Implementappealsprocess

•  Launchedstarra=ngandcommentsonphysicianprofilewebpages.

•  Establishgovernancegroup.

•  Developguidingprinciplesandcriteria.

Page 22: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Addressing MD Concerns

“Wewillbecri+cizedifwedon’torderun-warrantedtests.”

Concerns Mi+ga+onStrategies

•  Exclusioncriteriadeveloped

•  MD’swillhavetheopportunitytoreviewcommentsbeforebeingpostedpubliclyandanappealprocessisavailabletodisputecommentsgoingpublic

•  ServiceExcellenceoffersfurtherdataanalysisfortargetedimprovement

•  1:1MDcoachingavailable

“Reputa+onswillbeharmed/shamed.”

“Thiswillhurtphysicianmorale.”

Page 23: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Comments Review & Physician Appeals MD’sreviewcomments

monthly&submitanyappeals

•  ServiceExcellenceteamensurescommentwillnotbepostedonlineinpartnershipwithDigitalSolu=onsteam

Appealrequestsreviewedatweeklywith

ServiceMedicalDirectors

• Asupermajorityvoteisrequiredtoapproveordenyappealsrequests.• Theeventualdecisioniscommunicatedtothephysicianwhorequestedtheappeal.

MD’scanrequestasecondary

appealiftheydisagreewith

decision

• MD’scanprovideanyaddi=onalcommentaryinwri=ng

• Supermajorityvoteisrequiredtoapproveordenyasecondaryappeal

Page 24: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Guiding Principles & Difficult Appeals Inordertoincreasephysicianrecep=vity,weintroducedguidingprinciplestociteforapprovingappealsdecisions.

•  Askyourselfhowwouldyoufeelinthesitua<on?

•  Werethereextenua<ngcircumstances?(havesitua<onalawareness)

•  Wasthecommenttakentoheartanddidtheproviderputthoughtintoit?

•  Didtheylookintoit,addressit,and/ormakechanges?

•  Canwetaketheprovider’swordatfacevalue?(nohesaid,shesaid)

•  Dotheyrememberthepa<entorrecallthespecificvisit?

BeEmpathe=c RecognizePassion HaveTrust

Someexamplesofdifficultappealsrequests:•  “Ididn'thaveconfidencehewasdoingthingscorrectly.”•  “Doesapoorjobofexplainingall(repeatall)op<ons.”•  “Lackofknowledgeofmycondi<onandunwillingtolearnmoretohelpme.”•  “ThedrugsheprescribedhadsideeffectsthatIexperienced,wishshehadtoldme.”

Page 25: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Results by the Numbers

25

Pre-2011 By2015

Likelihoodtorecommend(LTR)Inpa+entß à

ß à

ß à

ß à

EmployeeEngagement

Loca+onsforManagementRounds

LTRCancerCenter

89thPercen=le

75%

216

90thPercen=le

63rdPercen=le

61%

62

22ndPercen=le

Page 26: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

MD Star Ratings Comments

Whatpa+entsaresaying:

85%of“careprovider”commentsareposi+ve.

“DoctorPerezismybestguardianangel.Hehelpsmetosurvivemyseriousillness.Hesowonderful.”

“Ihavetotravel41/2hoursonewayforofficevisits,yetIs<lldoitbecauseITRUSTYOUWITHMYLIFE.”

“Doctorwitha"heart."Amazing,compassionate,smartandkind.Deeplytouchedbyher.”

Page 27: Transparency at Stanford: Open Notes and Provider Reviews

Thank You!

Questions & Answers