translational diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in...

24
Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied force will accelerate. If it interacts with the medium (solvent) the frictional force (F f ) opposing that acceleration is proportional to the velocity (u). The proportionality coefficient which relates the frictional force (F f ) to the velocity (u) is called the frictional coefficient, f. This is a function of the molecular size and shape, and also contains the viscosity of the solution, η. Note that the η here is not a property of the molecule itself, as is intrinsic viscosity [η], but is just simply the viscosity of the solution, which is usually 0.01 Poise. Hence, by measuring the speed with which a particle (protein) is moving through solution we are getting information about the limiting frictional resistance to

Upload: bonnie-wade

Post on 18-Jan-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Translational Diffusion:measuring the frictional force on the movement of a

macromolecule in solution.

A particle under the influence of a constant applied force will accelerate. If it interacts with the medium (solvent) the frictional force (Ff) opposing that acceleration is proportional to the velocity (u). The proportionality coefficient which relates the frictional force (Ff) to the velocity (u) is called the frictional coefficient, f. This is a function of the molecular size and shape, and also contains the viscosity of the solution, η. Note that the η here is not a property of the molecule itself, as is intrinsic viscosity [η], but is just simply the viscosity of the solution, which is usually 0.01 Poise.

Hence, by measuring the speed with which a particle (protein) is moving through solution we are getting information about the limiting frictional resistance to that movement, which is contained within the frictional coefficient. It is useful here that molecules generally obey the same hydrodynamic rules that apply to macroscopic objects. In the case of macroscopic objects, such as a marble, the dependence of the frictional coefficient on molecular size and shape is known.

Page 2: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Translational diffusion: a sphere has the following frictional coefficient:

ftrans = 6πηRs. The larger the radius of a sphere, the larger the frictional coefficient, and the slower will be the velocity under a given driving force. Rotational diffusion: for a particle rotating in solution, there is also frictional resistance due to the shear force with the solvent. The hydrodynamics of this for a sphere is

frot = 8πηRs3.

Note that for rotational diffusion, the frictional coefficient increases in proportion to the volume of the sphere, whereas for translational diffusion, the dependence is proportional to the radius.

Page 3: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Frictional Force (Ff) applied Force (Fap)

DiffusionFrictional Resistance to Macromolecule Motion

velocity, u

Ff = f • u f frictional coefficient

steady state - terminal velocity is reached u = (Fap / f)

For a sphere:

ftrans = 6RS translational motion

frot = 8RS3 rotational motion

Measure molecular motion f Rs molecular size and shape information

Page 4: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Diffusion is a purely statistical (or entropic) concept. It represents the net flow of matter from a region of high chemical potential (or concentration) to a region of low chemical potential. Diffusion can be considered as

1) the net displacement of a molecule after a large number of small random steps: random walk model. Alternatively, 2) it can also be looked at in terms of the net flow of matter under the influence of a gradient in the chemical potential, which can be formally treated as a hypothetical "force" field.

Both approaches provide useful physical insight into how the diffusion of macromolecules can be utilized to yield molecular information. We will derive the concepts in terms of 1-dimension, and then generalize to 3-dimensions.

Page 5: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Translational diffusion

Measured classically by observing the rate of “spreading” of the material: flux across a boundary

Two equations relate the rate of change of concentration of particles as a function of position and time:

Fick’s first law

Fick’s second law

Phenomenological Equations

Page 6: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

A area of reference plane

n1 n2

J = flux moles (net)area • time

l l

Flux of particles depends on the concentration gradient Fick’s first law

(concentration)

Define the diffusioncoefficient: D (cm2/sec)

Fick’s 1st law:

J = -Ddndx

Page 7: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Fick’s 2nd law:

= Dd2ndx2

dndt

area A

dn (J1 - J2) Adt dx A

=

dxJ1 J2

Change in concentration requires a difference in concentration gradientFick’s second law

volume

change in # particlesper unit time

Constant gradient: same amountleaves as enters the box

Gradient higher on left: more entersthe box than leaves

Page 8: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Translational DiffusionSolve Fick’s Laws - differential equations ( relate concentration, position, time)

(define boundary and initial conditions)diffusion in 1 - dimension All (N) particles are at x = 0 at t = 0

-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

c(x,t) = ( D t)1/2 • e solutionN2

-x2 / 4 D t

Note: <x2> = average value of x2

<x2> = p(x) dx • (x2) where p(x) is the probability of the molecules being at position x

<x2> = 2 D t mean square displacement

+

-

Material spreads

(Gaussian)

Page 9: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Mean square displacement - in 3-dimensions isotropic diffusion Dx = Dy = Dz

<x2> = 2Dt<y2> = 2Dt<z2> = 2Dtl2 = 6Dt

where l2 = <x2> + <y2> + <z2>

D = cm2/sec

NOTE: Mean displacement time

l2

6t

average displacement from the starting point = (6Dt)1/2

Page 10: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Values of Diffusion Coefficients1. Diffusion in a gas phase: D 1 cm2/sec (will depend on length of λ , the mean free

path)

2. Diffusion within a solid matrix: D ≈ 10-8 - 10-10 cm2/sec or much smaller

3. Diffusion of a small molecule in solution, such as sucrose in water at 25° C:

D ≈ 10-5 cm2/sec(takes 3 days to go ~ 4 cm)

4. Diffusion of a macromolecule in solution, such as serum albumin (BSA, 70,000 mol weight) in water at 20° C:

D ≈ 6 · 10-7 cm2/sec

D 10-6 - 10-7 cm2/sec(3 days 1 cm)

5. Very large molecules such as DNA diffuse so slowly that the measurements cannot even be made.

NOT a useful technique

Page 11: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Measuring the translational diffusion constant

The classical method of measuring the translational diffusion constant is to observe the broadening of a boundary that is initially prepared by layering the protein solution on a solution without protein. In practice, this is not done.

The preferred method for a purified protein is to use dynamic or quasi-elastic light scattering to get a value of the diffusion coefficient. The method measures the fluctuations in local concentrations of the protein within solution, and this depends on how fast the protein is randomly diffusing in the solution. There are commercial instruments to perform this measurement. Note that this does not yield a molecular weight but rather a Stokes radius. However, it is more common to use mass transport techniques to measure the Stokes radius of macromolecules.

As we saw with osmotic pressure and with intrinsic viscosity, it is often necessary to make a series of diffusion measurements at different concentrations of protein and then extrapolate to infinite dilution. When this is done a superscript “0” is added: Do. The next slide shows results obtained for serum albumin.

Page 12: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Translational Diffusion

Classical technique boundary spread

(mg/mL)

x (distance)

BSA

* values of D have NOT beencorrected for pure water

at 20oC

Do

0 5 10 15 C (mg/mL)

3.22

3.28

3.24

107 x D Extrapolate to infinite dilution(designated by Do)

start end

Page 13: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Another way to measure the value of theDiffusion Coefficient is by Fluorescence Correlation

Spectroscopy (FCS)

By measuring fluctuations in fluorescence, the residence time of a fluorescent molecule within a very small measuring volume

(1 femtoliter, 10-15 L) is determined. This is related to the Diffusion Coefficient

molecules moving intoand out of the measuringvolume: fast (left) vs slow (right)

http://www.probes.com/handbook/boxes/1571.html

excitation

emitted photons

Page 14: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy: FCS

the time-dependence of the fluorescence is expressedas an autocorrelation function, G(),

the is the average value of the product of thefluorescence intensity at time t versus the intensity at a short time, , later. If the values fluctuate faster than time then the product will be zero.

deviation from the average intensity

Page 15: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

An example of FCS: simulated autocorrelation functions of

a free fluorescence ligand and the same ligand bound to a protein

free ligand (small, fast diffusion)

bound ligand on slow moving protein

1:1 mix of free/bound ligand

G() goes to zeroat long times

Page 16: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

D = kT 6RS

Stokes-EinsteinEquation

Relating D to molecular properties

Rate of mass flux is inversely proportional to the frictional drag on the diffusing particle

D = kTf

k = Boltzman constantf = frictional coefficient

But f = 6RS for a sphere or radius Rs

= viscosity of solutionThis expression appears to be valid for large objects such as marbles, and for macromolecules, and even for small molecules, at least to the extent that D·η is a constant for a molecule of fixed radius as the viscosity is changed.

Page 17: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Stokes Radius obtained from Diffusion

kT Assumes a spherical shape 6RS Stokes Radius

kT 6D

1 You need additional information to judge whether the particle is really spherical

-A highly asymmetric particle behaves like a larger sphere - higher frictional coefficient (f)

2 Deviations from the assumption of an anhydrous sphere (Rmin) are due to either

a) hydrationb) asymmetry

3 Stokes radius from different techniques need not be identical

D =

RS =

1. Measure D

2. Calculate Rs

Page 18: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

kT kT f 6RS

f = 6Rs

Define: fmin = 6Rmin

so: Rs f Rmin fmin

Hydrodynamic theory defines the shape dependence of f, frictional coefficient

D = =

=

b a

(a / b)

f / fmin

this allows one to estimate effects due to molecular asymmetry

Rmin

vol = [V2 • ]

= R3min

43

MN

Experimental:

Theoretical:

1. Measure D and get Rs

2. Compare Rs to Rmin

Interpreting the meaning of the Stokes Radius

Page 19: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Shape factor for translational diffusion

frictional coefficient of ellipsoids

for a prolate ellipsoid

frictional coefficient

shape factor viscosity shape

factor

much larger effectof shape on viscosity thanon diffusion

(Cantor + Schimmel)

oblateprolate

f/f m

in

Page 20: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Interpreting Diffusion Experiments:does a reasonable amount of hydration explain the measured value of D?

Protein M Do20,W x10-7 cm2/s RS(Å) (diffusion)

RNAse 13,683 11.9 18 (Rmin=17Å)Collagen 345,000 0.695 310 (Rmin=59Å)

protein Maximum solvation Maximum asymmetry

RNAse H2O = 0.35 a/b = 3.4Collagen H2O = 218 a/b = 300

RS (Vp + H2O) 1/3

Rmin Vp

solve for H2O

=

Volume per gram of anhydrous protein

Page 21: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

What is the Diffusion Coefficient of a Protein in the bacterial cytoplasm?

Are proteins freely mobile?

Some proteins will be tethered

Some proteins will interact transiently with othersand appear to move slowly

Free diffusion will be slower due to “crowding” effectexcluded volume effect at high concentration of protein

Page 22: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Measuring the Diffusion of Proteins in the Cytoplasm of E. coli

Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP)

1. Express a protein that is fluorescent: green fluorescent protein, GFP.2. Use a laser to “photo-bleach” the fluorescent protein in part of a single

bacterial cell. This permanently destroys the fluorescence from proteins in the target area.

3. Measure the intensity of fluorescence as the protein diffuses into the region which was photo-bleached.

Ready..Aim...

Fire! Diffusion of protein into the spot

t0t1 t2

E. coli cell

Page 23: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Single cell, expressing GFP

Bleach cell center with a laser, t0

t = 0.37 sec after flash

t = 1.8 sec after flash

J. Bacteriology (1999) 181, 197-203

Diffusion of the Green Fluorescent Protein inside E. coli

4 µmone can observe themolecules diffusing

back into the bleachedarea

Page 24: Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied

Diffusion of the Green Fluorescent Protein inside E. coli

Results: D = 7.7 µm2/sec (7.7 x 10-8 cm2/sec)

this is 11-fold less than the diffusioncoefficient in water = 87 µm2/sec

Slow translational diffusion is due to the crowding resulting from the very high protein concentration in the bacterial cytoplasm (200 -300 mg/ml)

J. Bacteriology (1999) 181, 197-203