transit oriented development strategic plan for bhopal ...sutpindia.com/skin/pdf/workshop...
TRANSCRIPT
Transit Oriented Development Strategic Plan for Bhopal
Session 1: TOD in the Indian Context
26th February, 2015
IBI GROUP
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
3
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
3
T = Transit frequency and
usefulness
O = Orienting infrastructure
for making pedestrian
connections between transit
and development
D = Development featuring
a mix of uses and densitiesSource: Dena Belzer, Strategic Economics
DEMYSTIFYING TODDEMYSTIFYING TOD
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
4
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
4
TOD PLANNING SCALES
Successful TODs are a result of coordinated planning policies
implemented consistently at varying geographic scales- regional, city,
corridor, neighbourhood, and site - over a time period of 10-20 years.
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
8
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
8
TOD Supportive Regulations.. Attempts in India- Ahmedabad
• Proposed Local Area Plans for the overlay zones
• Differential FSI- high in CBD area, along Sabarmati riverfront and transit corridor
• Removed height restrictions
• Increased ground coverage from existing 30% to 51%
• Premium FSI for energy efficient buildings
• Mandatory water harvesting, waste water reuse and solar energy for plot areas > 5000 sqm
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
9
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
9
TOD Supportive Regulations.. Attempts in India- Bangalore
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
10
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
10
TOD Supportive Regulations.. Attempts in India- Mumbai
• ‘Shop-Line’ concept built into DCR/ DP
• Inclusionary housing requirement
• Parking Restrictions
• Differential FARs: 2.5-8.0
• Decentralized infrastructure
• In lieu of FAR as a “by-right” controlling mechanism use open space & parking at the parcel level to guide development
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
11
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
11
TOD Supportive Regulations.. Attempts in India- Mumbai
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
12
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
12
TOD Supportive Regulations.. Attempts in India- Naya Raipur
• Reduced parking standards
• Well-designed transit station for a high quality user experience
• Proposed streetscape design
• Active frontage- street facing buildings
• Mixed use development
• TOD supportive Ground Coverage, FAR, Height and Other Controls
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
13
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
13
Lessons Learned
1. Station Area Planning to determine appropriate densification;
2. Special Overlay Zoning Districts as supplemental provisions to existing regulations
3. Differential FARs to adjust for contextual variation according to on-ground conditions;
4. Land Pooling to proactively push market towards TODs around station;
5. Density bonuses (higher FARs) in exchange of public infrastructure investments by private sector; and
6. Mixed-Use Development within a walking distance from transit stations
Transit Oriented Development Strategic Plan for Bhopal
Session 2: National Level TOD Guidance Document
26th February, 2015
IBI GROUP
Project BackgronundProject Overview
• Enhance Capacity in implementing sustainable transportation concepts in the
country for NMT, Bike Sharing & TOD through the development of
– Guidance documents
– Two City Specific Plans each
• Ensure that Guidance Documents address practical on-ground issues:
demonstration projects in two cities for each of the 3 themes
• Empanel consultants who can carry out projects in these three areas
16
Need for TOD Guideline
Western concepts need to be
adjusted to the Indian context
Absence of national level
guidance documents resulting in
various interpretations of the
planning, design and
implementation process
Multiple versions of these
"western" concepts are floating in
the cities and there is a threat of
confusion/ ambiguity being
created by these disconnected
efforts
Scalability/ Learning from
Success Stories
17
Need for Guidelines
Large-scale infrastructure
investments in transit systems
and initiatives such as Delhi-
Mumbai Industrial Corridor need
to realign with TOD principles
of:
integrated land use and
transportation
pedestrian prioritization, and
reduction of automobile usage
Align with Smart Cities
Mission
18
Who will be responsible for preparing
and implementing TOD plans?
a. Development or Planning Authority/
Municipal Corporation: Planning,
Implementation, and Enforcement
b. Transit Agency: Planning and
Implementation
19
What is the ideal scale for planning TODs?
Region or City | Corridor | Station Area | Project Site.
20
Can TOD policies be incorporated into statutory
documents such as the Comprehensive Development
Plan/ Master Plan/ Development Control Regulations?
• Master Plan Update process which happens typically every ten
years;
• As a separate TOD chapter inserted as an amendment to the
existing Master Plan;
• As modifications to specific elements of DCRs such as parking
requirements, building heights, FARs, setbacks, public realm
improvements along priority transit corridors; or
• As urban design guidelines supporting Development Control
Regulations.
21
In the western context, TODs are often used as a
planning tool to increase population densities and
transit ridership. Will increased FARs in TOD areas
be relevant in dense Indian cities?
Will TOD as a concept be effective in built-up urban
areas?
Indian cities may be dense, but safe, secure and efficient
pedestrian connections within developments and to adjacent
development and Public Transport are not always there.
high density areas in Indian cities are characterized by singular uses
instead of mixed land uses including a mismatch between jobs
and housing development density near transit stops and stations.
How will the Guidance Document help cities- HOW?
• Streamline the process of TOD
planning in the country
• Avoid duplication of effort by
individual governments/
municipalities
• Sensitive to contextual variations
and on-ground realities
• Applicability at various scales
• Diverse user groups
• Flexible standard for development of
Greenfield areas & redevelopment
of infill areas
Target Users- WHO?
State &
Local
Planning
Agencies
Private
Stakeholders
Transit
Agencies
• City’s readiness for implementing TOD
• Development along transit corridors
• Improving infrastructure
• Station Area Planning
• Active marketing of TOD opportunities
• Joint development at stations
• Real estate development
• Joint development opportunities
Guidance Document- PROCESS
Step-by-step
process
Principles +
Components
Tools
Process from inception to implementation is
captured in “five key steps”:
Additional detail - logical sequence of
activities in accomplishing tasks in
varying conditions.
Principle focusing on aspects of design and
planning of TOD
TOD Guidance Document - STEP BY STEP
Based on:
• Lessons Learned from Best
Practices
• Current Initiatives in India; and
• Workshop Feedback
• Framework for Guidance
Document based on five themes
STEP-3 PLAN + DESIGN PRINCIPLES
MULTIMODAL
INTEGRATION1 FIRST & LAST MILE
CONNECTIVITY2INTERCONNECTED
STREET NETWORKCOMPLETE STREETS
NMT NETWORK TRAFFIC CALMING
35
46
STEP-3 PLAN + DESIGN PRINCIPLES
MIX LAND USES7 OPTIMIZE DENSITIES8STREET ORIENTED
BUILDINGMANAGE PARKING
INFORMAL
SECTORHOUSING DIVERSITY
99 101211
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
40
Retail building abuts footpath, keeping pedestrians safe & street active.....
Zero Setback edge condition
Shanghai (Source: UTTIPEC, DDA)
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
41
Zero Setback edge condition: CIVIC BUILDING
Shanghai (Source: UTTIPEC, DDA)
Transit Oriented Development Strategic Plan for Bhopal
Session 4: Panel Discussion
26th February, 2015
IBI GROUP
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
50
IBI GROUP Defining the cities of tomorrow
50
CHALLENGES IN INTEGRATED TOD PLANNING
• Overlapping Institutional
Responsibilities
• Conflicting Policies & Values
• Timing of Transit & Land Use
Decisions
• Disconnect between Scales
of Planning
• Obsolete Development
Regulations
• Lack of structure in Real
Estate Markets
• Technical Capacities