transformations - vtechworks.lib.vt.edurecently, sverre fehn™s house in norrkoping utilized...
TRANSCRIPT
Transformations:An Arts Center for Narrows Virginia.
i
A design thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of VirginiaPolytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillmentof the degree of Master of Architecture.
December 1, 1999Blacksburg, Virginia
TransformationsAn Arts Center for Narrows, Virginia.
byPaul Gehringer
_____________________________________________________________________________________
William Galloway - Thesis Chairman
________________________________________________________________________
Michael O�Brien
________________________________________________________________________Mario Cortes
ii
abstractWhat is the role of mecha-nisms and change in architec-ture? How does a buildingrelate to the people in andaround it? How might archi-tecture interact with people,not as an object, but as aparticipant in a dialogue?
iii
Burruss entrance - Virginia Tech
iv
table of contentsintroduction
precedents
origins of the project
the project
the site
plans and sections
relation to the street
element of time
people as dynamic element
functional qualities
spatial qualities
details
order
conclusion
bibliography/Credits
acknowledgments
vita
v
Watercolor section study
vi
�There is an inherent suggestion ofaction in images of architecture,
the moment of active encounter,or a promise of use and pur-
pose.... A building is encountered;it is approached, confronted,related to one�s body, moved
through, utilized as a condition forother things.�
Juhani PallasmaaEyes of the Skin
introductionArchitecture is not static.Buildings are alive withmechanisms that facilitatesuch things as the openingand closing of doors andwindows. Modern buildingshave an array of mechanicalsystems that turn on fans andopen or close vents to regu-late the environment. Beyondthese mechanisms, buildingschange as a result of theeffects of the passing of time.Weathering and use leavetraces on a building�s surfacethat give an observer a senseof the building�s history.So what causes buildings tochange? Mechanisms arejust some of the tools thatfacilitate change; the reasonbuildings change is people.Rooms are not partitionedbecause a function requiresless space, but becausesomeone desires a smallerarea in which to perform anactivity. Buildings do not needfresh air or a specific level oflight- people do and as aresult windows are opened.When viewed from theoutside, these changesanimate a building andhumanize it.
1
precedentsMechanisms in HistoryMechanisms are not new toarchitecture. Gothic cathe-drals required the use ofhinges for their many doors.More than just a functionaldetail, these doors developedsymbolic purposes. On theentrance, a door scaled to thesize of a person would be setinto one of the large doorsscaled to the size of thechurch. The door on thenorthwest transept side,meanwhile would be reservedfor the use of the Bishop.
In medieval Japan, an elabo-rate system of sliding parti-tions was developed. Thesepanels - called shoji if they aretranslucent, fusuma if they areopaque - are paper coveredpanels set into parallel tracksin the floor. These partitionsallowed for the openness andflexibility that are hallmarks ofJapanese residential con-struction.
1. Chartes Cathedral - South Transept
2. Katsura Villa
2
Movement in ElevationIn the 20th century, the use ofmechanisms as an expressiveelement has been explored byarchitects in different ways.Steven Holl�s StoreFront for Artand Architecture magnified thecondition of an urban store-front, which presents a differentfacade depending on whetheror not the building is open tothe public. In a similar manner,Peter Worndl�s �Gucklhupf� is aplywood box which can beunfolded in a number of waysto present different vantagepoints from which to view thelandscape. Both of theseprojects use mechanismsthat enable the elevation to beradically altered.
GucklhupfHans Peter Worndl
StoreFront for Art and Architecture - New YorkSteven Holl & Vito Accondi
3
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
precedents
Movement in PlanOther architects have usedmechanisms as a response tothe functional requirements ofa building. In Gerrit Rietveld�sSchroeder House, numeroushinged and sliding panelsallow the building to bedivided into discrete rooms orcompletely opened up. Morerecently, Sverre Fehn�s Housein Norrkoping utilized slidingdoors as a way of dividing ahouse into either one or ninerooms, depending on thenumber of people living thereat the time.
�The sliding walls regulatethe light and secure the
silence of night. Thehouse is a reference in
relation to each day. Thedoor mechanism is a
challenge to make theplace coexist with one�stemperament. For the
lazy man the houseremains the same and
his walk is a passageengraved forever.�
Sverre Fehn
House in NorrkopingSverre Fehn
14. Schroeder HouseGerrit Rietveld
4
1615
precedents
origins of the projectThis project began with thestudy of a wall. A chipboardmodel was constructedcontaining 12 openings whichcould be open and closed.While the openings differedgreatly from each other, theyoperated under a commonrule: the movement of eachhad to contribute somethingto the wall besides a changeof position. Some created anew element, such as anawning or vestibule, whileothers changed the profile ofthe wall. Most of the ele-ments were �shadow-casters�that changed the wall throughan unexpected transforma-tion.
5
6
7
8
the projectThe project is a small artscenter containing artists�studios, classroom space, anda gallery, to be located nearthe entrance to Narrows, VA.The site includes an existingbrick building which is to berenovated and is closelybounded by two roads that runalong opposite sides of thebuilding.The intent of this project is tocreate a building which bothengages the people who useit and makes their presenceevident on the exterior. Theresulting landmark wouldpresent an image of the lifethat exists in the town.
axonometric of existing site conditions
9
axonometric of building from southwest
10
View to downtown from northwest
View to downtown from southeast
the site
11
N
2
3
1
Key:1. Wolf Creek2. New River3. Route 4604. Virginia Western Railroad
4
site plan
12
mechanical room
sculpture garden
gallery
4� 8� 16� 32�
13
studio
scale
plans
first floor
studio
classroom
existing building
14
second floor
plan details
Gallery (first floor)
4� 8� 16�
15
Gallery interior
Second floor Studios
Classroom (second floor)
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
sections
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
18
first floor plan-open/closed
closed open
19
second floor plan-open/closed
closed open
20
How do buildings relate to thestreet? The openings in afacade reveal the life occurringinside, either through thepattern of open /closed, or lit /unlit at night. These changespinpoint activity and accentu-ate the presence of otherpeople.The adjustment of thesecontrols over the course of aday cause the elevations tochange. In this way, they alsoserve as a temporary record ofthe passing of time.
The northwest elevation in thisproject contains a variety ofdoors and windows thatexaggerate the differencebetween open and closed.The result is that the openingof a window has an effect onthe whole facade, not just theroom.
relation to the street
New Engineering Building - Virginia Tech
21
Elevation study
�Seen from the outside, it isthe openings in a wall that
strike the strongest rhythmsacross its face, and that
narrate the life within, eitherdirectly, through the activities
they reveal... or by inference,through the pattern or shapeof windows that suggest thenature of spaces behind....�
Donlyn LyndonChambers for a Memory Palace
22
4� 8� 16� 32�
23
Northwest Elevation
24
25
Doors and windows closed
Doors and windows half open
Doors and windows open
26
4� 8� 16� 32�
27
Unlike the varied northwestelevation, the southeast
elevation is marked by unifor-mity. This is the location ofthe corridor which runs thelength of the building. The
nature of these openings - ashutter that slides parallel to
the wall - serves to minimizethe differences in position
rather than emphasize them.
Southeast Elevation
28
On the southeast side of thebuilding, as a contrast to thevariable elevations of the stu-dios, the pace of change slowsdown. Instead of time beingmeasured in hours of a day, itswitches to seasons of a year -or years. Here a place is madefor plants to grow and rain orsnow to lie. Vines grow andwither along the sloped wallwhile rain is channeled into thegaps between the pavers. Inthe winter, snow blankets thesculptures and dormant plants.
passage of time
Horticulture Garden - Virginia Tech
29
Sculpture garden
30
Inside, the corridor uses staticelements to take advantage ofthe movement of people. Asvisitors move through the artscenter, their experience of thebuilding changes. Deepvertical mullions along thestudio windows to the corridoralternately obscure and revealviews into these rooms. Onthe second floor, a gapbetween the corridor and therooms provides glimpses intothe activity on the first floor.Starting in the dark volume ofthe existing brick building,visitors move along a pathwhich is occasionally lit bylight-monitors on the roof.This path is punctuated bybrightly lit sections at eitherend of the new addition.
people as the dynamic element
Mission San Jose - San Antonio
31
Studio walk-by
32
Plan at Southwest entrance
33
1
View inside lobby
Southwest elevation
1
34
Plan at Northeast entrance
2
35
Northeast elevation
View from stairs2
36
The studios are divided bypartitions which can bemanipulated in various waysto open up and connect them.Unlike an accordion partitionwhich only has two positions -open and closed - these wallsslide and rotate to produce avariety of configurations.These walls consist of 2 largepanels, each of which containa door. The panels can pivot90 degrees to define a smallerroom within the larger one, orone panel may be pivoted 180degrees to produce a partitionhalf as long. The panels alsoslide along a track to allow thespace to be completelyopened up. Around the sinksare L-shaped doors whichmay be closed to hide the dirtybrushes and other studiodebris from visitors. Thesedoors may also be left opento help shape the layout of thefloor. Through these doors,the building enters a dialoguewith the inhabitant by sug-gesting possibilities for use.
functional qualities
Studio study model
37
possible partition-wall configurations-aerial views
38
A window may convey infor-mation to passersby, but itsreal importance lies in what itdoes for the inhabitants of aroom. Windows can beadjusted to control theamount of sunlight or fresh air,but they can also be used toalter the character of a space.A room that receives all itslight from a window locatedalong the ceiling is brighterand has a different feel thanone that receives it from asingle window located at eye-level. When there are severalwindows open, the room iswashed in light and appearslarger because trees and hillsbegin to form the boundariesbeyond the immediate walls.If all of these windows wereclosed off except one, thedarkness and occasionalshafts of light would directone�s attention inward to theroom itself and the resultingcharacter would be one ofintimacy, or perhaps loneli-ness.
spatial qualities
Barn interior - Bally, Pennsylvania
39
40
Studio interior
41
Studio light-study
42
Pushout doorThis door extends theboundary of the studiobeyond that of thebuilding itself. Due to theproximity to the roadway,it also acts as a privacyscreen to the traffic. Itoperates in a mannersimilar to a drawer withtelescoping rails.
details
43
door frame interior doors exterior doors
door exterior door interior
Section
44
detailsBalcony doorThis door provides thesecond floor studios withan outdoor area bycreating a balcony justlarge enough for oneperson. The doors areopened by pushing onthe pivoting handrailswhich are attached to asteel grate. This graterides on rollers in achannel cast into theunderside of the concretefloor slab where it candisappear out of sightwhen the balcony is notin use.
45
slab with channels
floor and handrails
doors
Section
46
orderWhen dealing with elementsthat vary in position, it isimportant to construct aframework that orders them.The importance of this struc-ture lies in the way it relatesthe various pieces to eachother and to the whole, whileproviding a static backdropagainst which the elementscan react. In a system wheremany possibilities exist, it setsthe limits to what can occur.
The order in this projectcomes partially from limitingthe number of variables andtheir location. The elementsthat vary include a partitionwall, two types of windows,and two balcony doors. Theseare inserted into a grid-edframe which was partly derivedfrom using standardized doorand window sizes andheights. The static elements,such as column spacing, wereordered according to cluespicked up from the existing
building on the site.
Barn interior - Virginia Tech
47
48
the parts1. doors and windows2. frame3. structure4. existing building
4
2
49
1
2
3
4
1
50
conclusionAlthough many things change,there are still some constants.In architecture, I believe one ofthose constants is the impor-tance of the individual andtheir connection to the worldaround them. Monuments,which are built to commemo-rate events and ideas, are stillerected for the benefit of theviewer as much as they are forthose they honor. It is thisscale of the individual thatshould not be overlooked. It isnot enough that buildingshave a pleasing form or thatthey offer protection from theelements - these are minimalrequirements. Architecturehas the capacity to stir theimagination and as architects,we must use the tools at ourdisposal to accomplish this.Some of the tools are ab-stract, such as order or time,while others are as tangible asthe constructive materials orthe choice of a hinge.
51
52
bibliography
View from first floor balcony
Benedikt, Michael. For an Architecture ofReality. New York: Lumen Books, 1987
Engel, Heino. Measure and Construction of theJapanese House. Rutland, VT: Charles E.Tuttle Company, 1985
Fjeld, Per Olaf. Sverre Fehn: The Thought ofConstruction. New York: Rizzoli Interna-tional, 1983
Holl, Steven. Intertwining. New York: PrincetonArchitectural Press, 1996.
Hertzberger, Herman. �The Public Realm� A +U April 1991: 12-44
Isozaki, Arata. Katsura Villa, Space and Form.Trans. John D. Lamb. New York: RizzoliInternational, 1987
Lyndon, Donlyn, and Moore, Charles W.Chambers for a Memory Palace. Cam-bridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.
McCarter, Robert, ed. Pamphlet ArchitectureNo. 12, Building Machines. New York:Princeton Architectural Press, 1987
Mulder, Bertus, and Jan de Rook, Gerrit.Rietveld Schroder Huis 1925-1975. Utrecht:A.W. Bruna & Zoon, 1975
Norberg-Schulz, Christian. Sverre Fehn: OperaCompleta. Milan: Electa, 1997
Pallasmaa, Juhani. The Eyes of the Skin:Architecture and the Senses. London:Academy Editions., 1996.
Worndl, Hans Peter. �GucklHupf� A + U May1998: 46-59.
53
notes/creditsImages
Unless otherwise noted, photos and work are by the author.
p. 2 1 Chartes Cathedral http://info.pitt.edu/~medart/image/france/france-a-to-c/chartres/m0284cha.jpg 2 Katsura Villa YasuhiroIshimoto Katsura Villa, Space and Form p.100
p. 3 3,4 StoreFront for Art and Architecture Steven Holl Intertwiningp.110 5-13 GucklHupf Hans Peter Worndl a + u May 1998 p.49,52-55
p. 4 14 Schroder House Bertus Mulder Rietveld Schroder Huis1925-1975 p.42 15,16 House in Norrkoping Christian Norberg-Schultz Sverre Fehn: Opera Completa p.108, 109
Quotes
p. 1 Pallasmaa, Juhani. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and theSenses. p.44
p. 4 Fjeld, Per Olaf. Sverre Fehn: The Thought of Construction.p.67
p. 22 Lyndon, Donlyn. Chambers for a Memory Palace. p. 103-4
Northwest elevationstudies
54
acknowledgments
55
I would like to thank my class-mates here at Tech for theirfriendship and help during themaking of this thesis. I wouldespecially like to thank Abby, Bill,Catherine, Jeff, Julie, Sarah,Shane, Toygar, Phil and Brad.
Thank you to my family for all oftheir support.
Thank you to the staff of theArchitecture Library for makingme feel like a part of their family.
Finally, thank you to my commit-tee for all of their insight andassistance.
and to Rob - wherever you are....
56
vita
Paul J. Gehringer
Education:Master of ArchitectureVirginia Polytechnic Institute andState University1999
Bachelor of Arts in ArchitectureLehigh University1991
Experience:DraftsmanThe Architectural StudioAllentown, PA1991-1996
57
58