transformations in scholarly communication · 1. recommended open access to scholarly papers of...
TRANSCRIPT
Transformations in Scholarly Communication
Phill Jones, PhD
Head of Publisher Outreach
Digital Science
@phillbjones
“The publisher’s new job is to support researchers at
every stage of the research cycle” Annette Thomas
Utopia-Thomas Moore1516
Data as research output
Citable and engaged with
Web of contextual references
Narrative as supplement to data
Barend Mons talking about the ‘European Open Science
Cloud’ at APE in January 2016
http://river-valley.zeeba.tv/media/conferences/ape-2016/0101-Barend-Mons/
Dr Rachel HardingUniversity of Toronto
Can Blogging make research more transparent?
http://www.vox.com/2016/3/3/11148452/science-blog
Research is Changing
Science is Increasingly International
Source: ‘The Fourth Age of Research’ by Jonathan Adams, Nature 497, 557-
Source: Nature News, 19th December 2013
http://www.nature.com/news/scientists-losing-data-at-a-rapid-rate-1.14416
“But taxpayers who are paying for that
research will want to see something
back. Directly – through open access
to results and data. And indirectly –
through making science work better
for all of us.
That’s why we will require open
access to all publications stemming
from EU-funded research. That’s why
we will progressively open access to
the research data, too. And why we’re
asking national funding bodies to do
the same.”
Neelie Kroes.
Vice President for the European
Commission
“The Obama Administration is committed to the proposition that citizens deserve easy
access to the results of scientific research their tax dollars have paid for. That’s why,
in a policy memorandum released today, OSTP Director John Holdren has directed
Federal agencies with more than $100M in R&D expenditures to develop plans to
make the published results of federally funded research freely available to the public
within one year of publication and requiring researchers to better account for and
manage the digital data resulting from federally funded scientific research.”
February 22nd 2013
“Investigators are expected to share with other researchers, at no more than
incremental cost and within a reasonable time, the primary data, samples,
physical collections and other supporting materials created or gathered in
the course of work under NSF grants”
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/aag_6.jsp#VID4
“NEH is committed to timely and rapid data distribution”
http://www.neh.gov/files/grants/data_management_plans_2012.pdf
Publicly funded research data are a public good, produced in the
public interest, which should be made openly available with as few
restrictions as possible in a timely and responsible manner.
http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/DataPolicy/
Valen, Dan; Blanchat, Kelly (2015): Overview of OSTP Responses. figshare.https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1367165.v7
January 2015 - according to Sherpa Juliet, 34
funders required data archiving, 16 encourage it
UK funder data archiving policies
US Governmental funders mandating data
depositsEverybody needs a place
to put their data (and the
means to organize it)
1. Recommended open access to scholarly papers of
publicly funded research
2. Recommended open access to all digital outputs of
publicly funded research
3. Mandated open access to scholarly papers of publicly
funded research
4. Mandated open access to all digital outputs of publicly
funded research
5. Enforced, mandated open access to scholarly papers of
publicly funded research
6. Enforced, mandated open access to all digital outputs of
publicly funded research
The Open Academic Tidal Wave
Two approaches to data repositories
Structured
• Data is curated and standards are enforced
• Data is gathered with the aim of creating a
super-data set
• Easily machine readable
• Examples: Genbank, HEASARC
Unstructured
• All data types can be stored
• Varying degrees of curation
• Institutional, publisher, non-profit and private
offerings
• Not necessarily machine readable
• Examples: Figshare, Dryad, zenodo, Pure
Research Assessment is Changing
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rereports/Y
ear/2015/metrictide/Title,104463,en.html
http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/
Open Science ≠ Open Access
A body of work begins with an idea and
ends when the impact of that idea has
been maximized.
Institutional/funding needs
Research management software, reporting
Personal Impact
Altmetrics, Author profiles
Documentation of findings
Publications, Open data
Doing the Research
Digital Notebooks, Lab Management Software
Getting an Idea
Reference Managers, Social Reading
Traditional Point of Contact
Original Idea
Perform Research
Write Article
Submit
Reviews and Revisions
Point of Publication
Maximize Impact
Share Information
Upstream Engagement• Collaborative Authorship• Community Services• Predictive data
Downstream Engagement• COUNTER / usage stats• Altmetrics• Data publishing
Symplectic
From the bench compliance
Data Type
Fundref
GRID
ORCID
Integrated into workflow
Intuitive