transcription labrel

Upload: queenie-leguin

Post on 03-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Transcription LABREL

    1/5

    September 4 2013 Labor Rev

    These are the kinds of elections in theThese are found in

    the labor code, this is found in the jurisprudence. Theres

    one more, petition for de-certification election. Thats

    found in LVN vs Philippine Musicians Guild 1 Scra (i

    dont know the page) 1961. Petition for certificationelection can be filed either by a legitimate labor

    organization or an employer when requested to bargain

    collectively. Remember, when out of the blue, there is a

    union that goes to the employer and says, here are our

    bargaining proposals, let us now sit down and bargain

    because we are the exclusive bargaining agent of the

    bargaining unit. Now, the employer can now have under

    the labor code and the rules that implement the labor code,

    they can say, okay, lets sit down and bargain. And then

    they can jointly submit a statement of voluntary

    recognition under oath thats in the implementing rules,

    the new implementing rules. And then the Department

    BLR will put a stamp of approval by directly certifying the

    union as the exclusive bargaining agent. Theres a problem

    with that and that is the latest case of Sta. Lucia East

    Commercial Corporation vs. Honorable Secretary 596

    SCRA 92 August 14, 2009 case. Heres a union that files

    a petition for the workers including supervisors, rank-and-

    file and naay duha ka lugas na managers na naapil.

    Dismissed by the Med Arbiter without prejudice to refiling

    because you cannot have all these people in the same

    bargaining unit. Dismissed. After they dismissed it, they

    are applying for registration of a new union. Wala na tuy

    labot tung uban. While the petition, their application to be

    registered was pending, here comes management with

    another union entering a collective bargaining agreement

    and presenting it to dept of labor for registration/voluntary

    recognition. The Supreme Court says, there can be no

    voluntary recognition in an organized establishment.

    Organized, wa pa man na union. When there is petition

    pending for registration it seems the understanding of the

    SC is that it is an organized establishment.

    Thats the ruling in this case. So to add here, voluntary

    recognition/direct certification. It is the process other than

    certification election by which a union becomes an

    exclusive bargaining agent. Before, there was no need toapply or management to know and recognize a union

    They enter into a CBA. The CBA is registered. Then the

    CBA now bars any petition for certification election. The

    recognition by management is just antecedent to the

    registration of a CBA. If the CBA is registered, you pay

    the fee, it now bars any certification election. But then in

    the Samahan case, 10 years ago, the SC held that ruling

    there was a certification election. The NFL union was the

    only one running against no union. No union won. After

    no union won, the NFL waited for 1 year because of the

    certification year rule. At the end of 1 year, on the first day

    after the anniversary of the election, NFL filed for another

    petition for certification election because NFL was just los

    by a handful of votes. When they filed this petition after 1

    year, management moved to dismiss. Why? Barred by a

    registered certified collective bargaining agreement. They

    had in the meantime recognized another union and they

    entered into a CBA, and they registered it. Is that valid?

    Supreme Court says, no that is not valid. In that ruling the

    SC said, there is need for a certification election. This

    recognition is impossible according to the SC. Why? Less

    than a year ago, this bargaining unit rejected the notion of

    representation in a certification election. Thats a free

    decision because it is by secret ballot. Why all of a sudden

    they chose an exclusive bargaining representative. That is

    only the machination of the management. Inimbento to

    Company union to. That is what the supreme court said

    Now, here we are, this Sta Lucia case. They filed a

    certification of election, wa gani maka.hold of certification

    election. kay ngano man? the bargaining unit was wrong

    so they re-registered a union. This time without the

  • 8/12/2019 Transcription LABREL

    2/5

    supervisors. While they are applying for registration,

    management recognizes another union, they go to the

    Department of Labor. The Department of Labor directly

    certifies. Supreme Court says, you cannot go through

    voluntary recognition if it is an organized establishment.

    Ngano organized man? kay naa namay union. Nasayop

    lang to sila pag file. My point to your attention the

    definition in the rules to implement the labor code, the

    definition of certification election/consent election, pareho

    na. In fact the definition says with or without, ah. Thats

    found in Book 5 Rule 1 section 1 letter H. Certification

    eletion or consent election. It says, refers to the process of

    determining through secret ballot the sole and exclusive

    representative of the employees in an appropriate

    bargaining unit for purposes of collective bargaining or

    negotiation. The certification election is ordered by the

    Department while the consent election is voluntarily

    agreed upon by the parties with or without the intervention

    of the department. I told you how self defeating this

    definition is. Does not make sense. Why? If consent

    election is the same as certification election there must be

    a certain certification. If there is a certification, it involves

    a third party who will certify it. Then it says, there is not

    even a need for the department to intervene. kinsa man

    mo-certify, na nagkasabot man mong duha. Mahimo ba na

    magminyo, kamo ra duha. ha? wa man. Whoever wrote

    this implementing rule must not be a lawyer. Its like a

    stupid as audited financial statement pero walay auditor.

    ikaw ray nagpahigawas sa imung statement under your

    oath na kani maoy tinuod which is a gratuitous assertion.

    somebody has to say, kana iyang gisulti correct na, tinuod

    na. But that this is the union declared the exclusive

    bargaining agent thats correct because I was there. I

    supervised the election and the election was carried out in

    accordance with the rules. Therefore, proclaimed. dba?

    mao manay trabaho sa COMELEC. makabuhat ba diay ta

    ug election na walay comelec? Kinsa may mu-proclaim sa

    winner? wa nay kinahanglan ug botuhanan, rakrakan

    nalang nimo tanan. :D Thats the whole idea of the

    certification. Now. remember, a certification election

    number 1 condition for its validity is that at least a

    majority of the eligible voters of the bargaining unit must

    participate. Then it is a valid election. kinsa may

    makadaog? the one who gets a majority of the valid votes

    cast. Usa ka.gatos kabuok, naa sa sulod sa bargaining unit

    pila may kinahanglan aron ma.valid ang election? 50+1

    thats majority, is it not? 50%+1 is majority. 50%+1 cast

    their ballot, they participate. What happens if 20 of the

    ballots cast are invalid? kinsa man ilang gi-botohan didto?

    si Duterte. :D ang imung mga gipangbutang ana, sayop

    imung mga boto. di, only 40 ballots will be considered. Is

    that still a valid election? Yes. Because majority (50+1)

    participated. The valid votes are only 40. kinsa may

    makadaog anang electiona? kanang makakuha ug 21

    nianang 40. mao nay daog. Is that a majority of the

    bargaining unit? No! That is the crazy thing about election

    here. Election is only plurality, its not majority. majority

    ba diay makapa.elect nimo? dili. dili majority. Ug ang

    kalaban makumbinsi nimo ayaw mo ug boto, ayaw ninyo

    palabii, pildi nako ayaw nalang mo ug boto. ug dili sila

    muboto, oh di daog ka, bisag 20 ra to kabuok niboto. :D

    Now. if majority of the eligible voters do not participate

    and there is an election, what is the result? Failed election

    Failed. you have to have another election. This time, make

    sure that majority of the eligible voters participate. So, to

    the question: Is a second certification election always a

    run-off election? the answer is no. if the first election was

    failed because not the majority of the eligible voters

    participated then you will have to schedule anothe

    election. Even that you need a third party to certify that

    kinsa may mu.ingon na failed ang election? It must be an

    authority, a third person. That is the BLRthe Med

    Arbiter, you must seek and schedule another date for

    election. That is why this consent election definition is

    impractical. it is as if you are saying management lutuan

  • 8/12/2019 Transcription LABREL

    3/5

    na tanan mahimo nimothats the writing behind the lines

    of this definition. Now, when do you have a run-off

    election?

    1. if you have had a valid election before.

    2. In that valid election, there were at least 3

    choices. 3 choices. And then none of the choices received

    a majority of the valid votes cast.

    3. And then the votes of the unions is at least 50%

    in all. Then you have a run-off election.

    Those are provisions. Question: Can you have a

    certification election if theres only one union running?

    Yes. you can. What are the choices? Union A and No

    Union. Why? kinsa mani si No Union? kinsa mani na

    kandidato? Its the supreme courtwho said in Quijano vs

    CIR reiterated in Victoriano vs. Victoriano Workers

    Assoc., that the right to self-organization is not only the

    right to form, join, and assist a union of ones choice but

    also not to join any union. Even if you have only one

    union, it is incumbent upon you to hold a certification

    election. Why? because a certification election is the best,

    the optimum method in arriving at the choice of the

    bargaining unit. Bargaining unit in a certification election

    proceeding, there is a determination of two factual

    proceedings:

    1. What is the will of the bargaining unit. do they

    want representation or no representation? I tell you, for the

    first time, that is brought out in the latest case that i told

    you. This BPI. brought out there. The first issue to be

    determined in the certification election proceeding is

    whether or not this is the bargaining unit and what is its

    choice. If it wants representation, then, that will go to the

    next question.

    2. Who is the representative. That is determined in

    the election proper.

    Now, run-off election, 3 choices. so in the very least you

    have two unions running and No Union, in the very least

    why is there a requirement that 50% of the votes must be

    votes for the unions but none of them receives majority of

    the valid votes cast? because, if No Union receives already

    the majority of the valid votes cast, wa na, humana, daog

    na. If it is less than the majority of the valid votes cast

    then, at least 50% ni-a sa duha. Thats the only

    mathematical choice that you have. None of them receives

    majority of the valid votes cast. So what is the contest in a

    run-off election? The two choices with the highest number

    of votes is the one that is running for the run-off election.

    Can it be union A or no union? it can never be. It can only

    be either No Union wins or two unions go through a run-

    off election.

    Alright. what is a referendum? remember, this has got to

    do with the an allegiance to the federation. For it to be a

    valid disaffiliation, overwhelming majority of the those in

    the bargaining unit must withdraw their allegiance from

    their assisting representative and then choose another

    union federation. But no other terminology based on 9481

    a local or a chapter is a workplace union that has no

    independent registration. How was it registered? the

    federation that has registration issues a chapter certificate

    and then the local chapter now becomes a union with

    sufficient personality to file a petition for certification

    election. An affiliate is a workplace union that has an

    independent registration. Theyve accomplished an

    independent registration. Subsequently, they affiliate with

    a federation. Ngano mu-affiliate pa man siyag federation?

    because they feel inadequate. federation has so many

    resources. In effect, the affiliate has a double __

    personality because it can disaffiliate from the mothe

    federation without having to affiliate to another federation

    Why? because it can stand on its own. it has its own

    independent registration. and the SC has already said, tha

    a local chapter that disaffiliates from the federation and

  • 8/12/2019 Transcription LABREL

    4/5

  • 8/12/2019 Transcription LABREL

    5/5

    is intervention on the part of the Dept. of Labor. but I tell

    you that the cases so far that have been decided by the SC

    they have all been shutting down voluntary recognition

    under those circumstances. First circumstance: you cannot

    file for voluntary recognition within the 1 year certification

    year rule. 1 year from and after the results of certification

    election is the least there can be no petition for

    certification election neither can there be voluntary

    recognition if the one that wins in a certification election is

    No Union.

    Second rule (circumstance): this Sta. Lucia case. If there

    is a petition that is filed, it is dismissed and then there is a

    pending registration/re-registration of a union, part of the

    one who filed was dismissed. You cannot go through a

    voluntary recognition according to the SC. because that is

    already an organized establishment. So at least those two

    instances you know there cannot be a voluntary

    recognition.

    Alright? We are ready for the next exam. :P