transcending the silos: moving beyond borrowers and lenders in resource sharing

2
Transcending the Silos: Moving Beyond Borrowers and Lenders in Resource Sharing David Ketchum Resource Sharing Librarian [email protected] du Example Self Assessment S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Median 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 41% 100% 50% 45% 82% 50% Example Rotating Task Schedule S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Me 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 41% 100% 50% 45% 82% 50% 95% 100% 91% 68% 95% 95% Median level of competence/proficiency for the unit (Before) = 50% Median level of competence/proficiency for the unit (After) = 95% Combined increase in individual levels of competence/proficiency = 131% Individual & Median Levels of Competence/Proficiency Before & Ten Months After Cross- Training “I feel like I have more to offer the patrons and my coworkers in terms of being able to field patron questions, help out when coworkers are out of the office, and help student workers with training and troubleshooting.” “I enjoy the variety of work. It keeps things fresh and interesting to have a wider range of tasks than before.” “I love understanding the whole process or lifecycle of borrowing and lending and learning more about document delivery too. I don’t know how I got by before, knowing only my little piece of the whole picture.” “I really enjoy helping student workers, patrons, and other libraries more effectively – it gives me a sense of satisfaction and success.” Measured outcomes Self-assessed skill level for each task, 10 months after cross- training Quantified individual and median levels of proficiency Looked for unintended outcomes (example: borrowing request delay time) Solicited feedback from staff Process for cross-training Identified currently-assigned tasks Self-assessed skill levels for each task Quantified individual and median levels of proficiency Organized group training sessions Encouraged everyone to attend Covered multiple tasks/processes in each session Provided standard and “problem” examples Updated process/procedure manual Implemented rotating task schedule Ensures ongoing proficiency Change tasks each day; weekly schedule can change less frequently Focus on tasks everyone should understand Maintain some “specialized” tasks Assign tasks based on time commitment to better balance workloads Supplemented task schedule with task priority list Serves as guideline only Remain flexible Individual & Median Levels of Competence/Proficiency Before Cross-Training Example Task Priority List Nov em ber 20 11 Dec em ber 20 11 Jan ua ry 201 2 Feb ru ary 20 12 Mar c h 2012 Apr il 2012 May 2012 Jun e 2012 Jul y 2012 Aug us t 2012 September 2012 Oct ob er 201 2 Nov ember 2012 Dec em ber 20 12 Jan ua ry 201 3 Feb ruary 2013 Mar ch 2013 Apr il 2013 May 2013 Jun e 2013 July 2013 Aug ust 20 13 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Average Processing Delay Time (Minutes)

Upload: davidhketchum

Post on 05-Dec-2014

165 views

Category:

Business


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Poster presented by David Ketchum at the 2014 ILLiad International Conference, Virginia Beach, Virginia, March 18-20, 2014.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transcending the silos: Moving beyond borrowers and lenders in resource sharing

Transcending the Silos: Moving Beyond Borrowers and Lenders in Resource Sharing

David KetchumResource Sharing Librarian

[email protected]

Example Self Assessment

S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Median0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

41%

100%

50%45%

82%

50%

Example Rotating Task Schedule

S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Median0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

41%

100%

50%45%

82%

50%

95%100%

91%

68%

95% 95%

Median level of competence/proficiency for the unit (Before) = 50% Median level of competence/proficiency for the unit (After) = 95% Combined increase in individual levels of competence/proficiency = 131%

Individual & Median Levels of Competence/Proficiency Before & Ten Months After Cross-Training

“I feel like I have more to offer the patrons and my coworkers in terms of being able to field patron questions, help out when coworkers are out of the office, and help student workers with training and troubleshooting.”

“I enjoy the variety of work. It keeps things fresh and interesting to have a wider range of tasks than before.”

“I love understanding the whole process or lifecycle of borrowing and lending and learning more about document delivery too. I don’t know how I got by before, knowing only my little piece of the whole picture.”

“I really enjoy helping student workers, patrons, and other libraries more effectively – it gives me a sense of satisfaction and success.”

Measured outcomes• Self-assessed skill level for each task, 10 months after cross-training • Quantified individual and median levels of proficiency• Looked for unintended outcomes (example: borrowing request delay time)• Solicited feedback from staff

Process for cross-training• Identified currently-assigned tasks• Self-assessed skill levels for each task• Quantified individual and median levels of proficiency • Organized group training sessions

• Encouraged everyone to attend• Covered multiple tasks/processes in each

session• Provided standard and “problem”

examples• Updated process/procedure manual

Implemented rotating task schedule • Ensures ongoing proficiency• Change tasks each day; weekly schedule can

change less frequently• Focus on tasks everyone should understand• Maintain some “specialized” tasks• Assign tasks based on time commitment to

better balance workloadsSupplemented task schedule with task priority list

• Serves as guideline only• Remain flexible

Individual & Median Levels of Competence/Proficiency Before Cross-Training

Example Task Priority List

November

2011

December

2011

January

2012

Febru

ary 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August

2012

Septem

ber 2012

October

2012

November

2012

December

2012

January

2013

Febru

ary 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August

20130

50

100

150

200

250

300

Average Processing Delay Time (Minutes)

Page 2: Transcending the silos: Moving beyond borrowers and lenders in resource sharing

Transcending the Silos: Moving Beyond Borrowers and Lenders in Resource SharingPoster presented by David Ketchum2014 ILLiad International Conference, Virginia Beach, Virginia, March 18-20, 2014 When I arrived at the University of Oregon Libraries in February 2012 as the new Resource Sharing Librarian, there was a clear distinction between “Lenders” and “Borrowers” in ILL. Beginning in October 2012, the ILL team began cross-training across all ILL-related tasks and working from a rotating task schedule. These efforts have helped the ILL unit transcended the legacy model of distinct Lenders and Borrowers, greatly enhanced competence and efficiency across the department, and helped foster a collaborative learning environment.February 2012: Traditional “Borrowers and Lenders” model

4.5 FTE processing 90K transactions per year (50K Lending/40K Borrowing)Each task was assigned to a specific individual; some had designated backupsOctober 2012: Began cross-trainingSome Reasons for cross-trainingTranscend processing silosProvide more complete understanding of the entire ILL processRecognize priorities Fill in for others more easilyProvide better customer serviceOffer more comprehensive support for and oversight of student assistantsDiversify task assignments and learn new skillsCollaborate and team-buildEnhance flexibility Support UO Libraries’ Strategic Directions, i.e. Improve the User Experience, Become a Learning OrganizationBalance workloadEncourage development and succession planningProcess for cross-trainingIdentified currently-assigned tasksSelf-assessed skill levels for each taskQuantified individual and median levels of proficiency Organized group training sessions

Encouraged everyone to attendCovered multiple tasks/processes in each sessionProvided standard and “problem” examplesUpdated process/procedure manualImplemented rotating task schedule

Ensures ongoing proficiencyChange tasks each day; weekly schedule can change less frequentlyFocus on tasks everyone should understandMaintain some “specialized” tasksAssign tasks based on time commitment to better balance workloadsSupplemented task schedule with task priority listServes as guideline onlyRemain flexibleMeasured outcomesSelf-assessed skill level for each task, 10 months after cross-training Quantified individual and median levels of proficiencyLooked for unintended outcomes (example: borrowing request delay time)Solicited feedback from staff